MUKnine OPTIMUM protocol: a screening study to identify high-risk patients with multiple myeloma suitable for novel treatment approaches combined with a phase II study evaluating optimised combination of biological therapy in newly diagnosed high-risk multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukaemia

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell tumour with over 5800 new cases each year in the UK. The introduction of biological therapies has improved outcomes for the majority of patients with MM, but in approximately 20% of patients the tumour is characterised by genetic changes which confer a significantly poorer prognosis, generally termed high-risk (HR) MM. It is important to diagnose these genetic changes early and identify more effective first-line treatment options for these patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Myeloma UK nine OPTIMUM trial (MUKnine) evaluates novel treatment strategies for patients with HRMM. Patients with suspected or newly diagnosed MM, fit for intensive therapy, are offered participation in a tumour genetic screening protocol (MUKnine a), with primary endpoint proportion of patients with molecular screening performed within 8 weeks. Patients identified as molecularly HR are invited into the phase II, single-arm, multicentre trial (MUKnine b) investigating an intensive treatment schedule comprising bortezomib, lenalidomide, daratumumab, low-dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, with single high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by combination consolidation and maintenance therapy. MUKnine b primary endpoints are minimal residual disease (MRD) at day 100 post-ASCT and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include response, safety and quality of life. The trial uses a Bayesian decision rule to determine if this treatment strategy is sufficiently active for further study. Patients identified as not having HR disease receive standard treatment and are followed up in a cohort study. Exploratory studies include longitudinal whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for imaging MRD testing.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval London South East Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 17/LO/0022, 17/LO/0023). Results of studies will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN16847817, May 2017; Pre-results.

Why Immunotherapy Fails in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease despite great advances in its therapeutic landscape. Increasing evidence supports the belief that immune dysfunction plays an important role in the disease pathogenesis, progression, and drug resistance. Recent efforts have focused on harnessing the immune system to exert anti-myeloma effects with encouraging outcomes. First-in-class anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, daratumumab, now forms part of standard treatment regimens in relapsed and refractory settings and is shifting to front-line treatments. However, a non-negligible number of patients will progress and be triple refractory from the first line of treatment. Antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) are being developed in a heavily pretreated setting with outstanding results. Belantamab mafodotin-blmf has already received approval and other anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) therapies (CARs and bispecific antibodies are expected to be integrated in therapeutic options against myeloma soon. Nonetheless, immunotherapy faces different challenges in terms of efficacy and safety, and manufacturing and economic drawbacks associated with such a line of therapy pose additional obstacles to broadening its use. In this review, we described the most important clinical data on immunotherapeutic agents, delineated the limitations that lie in immunotherapy, and provided potential insights to overcome such issues.

Treatment of elderly patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: oral drugs adherence and the COVID-19 outbreak

Once the treatment of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma in the elderly is greatly influenced by the adherence of patients and family members, clinicians should be aware of patients’ behavior and lifestyle, as it may influence the individual treatment plan for each patient. Furthermore, treatment with oral chemotherapy is of special value during the COVID-19 outbreak. Multidisciplinary healthcare involvement is crucial in the management of polypharmacy, adverse events and dose adjustment due to comorbidities and natural loss of renal function with age. Oral drugs simplify intake, reduce hospital visits, and improve autonomy and quality of life. However, although oral drugs have advantages, they also transfer control and responsibility from the healthcare professional to the patient, who must be able to understand and follow the directions given. Therefore, patient education and communication with healthcare professionals are critical for adherence.

Therapeutic Opportunities with Pharmacological Inhibition of CD38 with Isatuximab

CD38 is a transmembrane glycoprotein with ectoenzymatic activity involved in regulation of migration, signal transduction, and receptor-mediated adhesion. CD38 is highly expressed on various malignant cells, including multiple myeloma (MM), and at relatively low levels in other tissues, making it a suitable target for therapeutic antibodies. Several anti-CD38 therapies have been, or are being, developed for the treatment of MM, including daratumumab and isatuximab (SAR650984), respectively. Studies have shown that anti-CD38 therapies are effective in the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM and are well tolerated, with infusion reactions being the most common side effects. They can be used as monotherapy or in combination with immunomodulatory agents, such as pomalidomide, or proteasome inhibitors to potentiate their activity. Here we examine isatuximab and several anti-CD38 agents in development that were generated using new antibody engineering techniques and that may lead to more effective CD38 targeting. We also summarize trials assessing these antibodies in MM, other malignancies, and solid organ transplantation. Finally, we propose that further research on the mechanisms of resistance to anti-CD38 therapy and the development of biomarkers and new backbone regimens with CD38 antibodies will be important steps in building more personalized treatment for patients with MM.

Clinical and Pharmacologic Features of Monoclonal Antibodies and Checkpoint Blockade Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Background:

Survival of multiple myeloma patients has considerably improved in the last decades thanks to the introduction of many new drugs, including immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors and, more recently, monoclonal antibodies.

Methods:

We analyzed the most recent literature focusing on the clinical and pharmacologic aspects of monoclonal antibody-based therapies in multiple myeloma, including monoclonal antibodies directed against plasma cell antigens, as well as checkpoint blockade therapy directed against immune inhibitory molecules, used as single agents or in combination therapy.

Results:

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies including daratumumab, isatuximab and MOR202 have shown outstanding results in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma patients. The addition of daratumumab to bortezomib-dexamethasone or lenalidomidedexamethasone substantially improved patients’ outcome in this patient population. The anti- SLAMF7 molecule elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone showed to be superior to lenalidomide-dexamethasone alone, without adding meaningful toxicity. Checkpoint blockade therapy in combination with immunomodulatory agents produced objective responses in more than 50% of treated patients. However, this combination was also associated with an increase in toxicity and a thorough safety evaluation is currently ongoing.

Conclusion:

Monoclonal antibodies are reshaping the standard of care for multiple myeloma and ongoing trials will help physicians to optimize their use in order to further improve patients’ outcome.

Present and Future of Immunotherapy in the Management of Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy with an increasing incidence and prevalence. The wide array of effective antimyeloma agents have transformed MM into a chronic condition for some patients, requiring long-term management planning. Immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors have played a pivotal role in defining the most effective regimens for both transplantation-eligible and transplantation-ineligible subgroups. Nevertheless, recent approvals of immunotherapies in MM such as daratumumab have added another important component to combination treatments for both relapsed or refractory and newly diagnosed disease. Evolving novel therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells are poised to raise the bar even further, holding a promise of effective treatment option for patients who would otherwise have limited treatment alternatives. As we continue to therapeutically exploit the essential roles of cell-mediated immune surveillance, antigen presentation, and modulation of inhibitory surface signaling, we are rapidly establishing the cornerstone role of immunotherapies in the management of all phases of MM. In this review, we will cover the spectrum of available immunotherapies approved for clinical use in MM, as well as briefly describe those in early- and late-phase development, with the focus of raising the awareness of the expanding immuno-oncology armamentarium in MM.

A U.S. Cost Analysis of Triplet Regimens for Patients with Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the FDA has approved several 3-agent (i.e., triplet) combinations for previously treated multiple myeloma (MM), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) now recommends triplet regimens over doublets. Little is known about the real-world cost of triplet combinations because of the limited time that they have been on the market since FDA approval. Furthermore, traditional cost analyses developed to support market entrance rely on utilization assumptions that are difficult to validate when numerous comparators simultaneously enter the market.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a 1-year cost analysis of novel triplets used for the treatment of patients with previously treated MM controlling for differences in utilization.

METHODS

FDA-approved, NCCN-recommended (preferred and category 1 for previously treated MM) treatments included in the analysis were daratumumab plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (DARA/LEN/DEX), daratumumab plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (DARA/BOR/DEX), elotuzumab plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (ELO/LEN/DEX), carfilzomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (CAR/LEN/DEX), and ixazomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (IXA/LEN/DEX). To control for market uptake, the model was designed to estimate the cost of treating an average patient over a 1-year time horizon. Drug administration and dosing, required comedications, postprogression therapy, monitoring requirements, and adverse event (AE) rates were based on FDA prescribing information or clinical trials. AEs ≥ grade 3 that occurred in ≥ 5% of patients were included. RED BOOK wholesale acquisition costs were used for drug acquisition costs. Costs of drug administration, AE management, and patient monitoring were based on the 2018 Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services payment rates or from published literature (inflated to 2018 U.S. dollars). The treatment duration for each regimen was estimated from modeled progression-free survival data; the 12-month progression-free survival rate was assumed to be equivalent to the probability that an average patient remained on therapy for at least 1 year after treatment initiation, which was used to estimate time-depended treatment-related costs. The probability of progression within 1 year of treatment initiation was used to inform the average postprogression therapy costs for each regimen.

RESULTS

The estimated cost per patient for each triplet regimen was $13,890 (DARA/BOR/DEX), $22,231 (IXA/LEN/DEX), $24,322 (ELO/LEN/DEX), $26,410 (DARA/LEN/DEX), and $27,432 (CAR/LEN/DEX). Drug acquisition costs and treatment duration were the largest drivers of cost. Scenario analyses with plausible alternative input parameters found the maximum per month cost of therapy to be $30,657 (CAR/LEN/DEX) and the minimum per month cost of therapy to be $13,784 (DARA/BOR/DEX).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis controlled for differential utilization rates for 5 FDA-approved, NCCN-recommended triplet therapies for the treatment of previously treated MM. Of the examined regimens, treatment with DARA/BOR/DEX was estimated to have the lowest average monthly cost per patient, while CAR/LEN/DEX was the most expensive. As is common with modeling, some assumptions were necessary, and results may not be generalizable.

DISCLOSURES

This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, which employs Maiese and funded Cornerstone Research Group, a health economic consulting group, to complete the cost analysis, interpret data, and develop the manuscript. Janssen was involved in the design of the analysis, interpretation of results, and manuscript development and approval. Grima is a founding partner of Cornerstone Research Group, which employs Hollmann, Goyert, and Moldaver. Hollmann, Goyert, and Moldaver were responsible for creation of the economic model. This work was peer-reviewed and presented as an abstract at the Lymphoma and Myeloma 2017 International Congress; October 26-28, 2017; New York, NY.

CD38 Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: Mechanisms of Action and Modes of Resistance

MM cells express high levels of CD38, while CD38 is expressed at relatively low levels on normal lymphoid and myeloid cells, and in some non-hematopoietic tissues. This expression profile, together with the role of CD38 in adhesion and as ectoenzyme, resulted in the development of CD38 antibodies for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). At this moment several CD38 antibodies are at different phases of clinical testing, with daratumumab already approved for various indications both as monotherapy and in combination with standards of care in MM. CD38 antibodies have Fc-dependent immune effector mechanisms, such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP). Inhibition of ectoenzymatic function and direct apoptosis induction may also contribute to the efficacy of the antibodies to kill MM cells. The CD38 antibodies also improve host-anti-tumor immunity by the elimination of regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Mechanisms of primary and/or acquired resistance include tumor-related factors, such as reduced cell surface expression levels of the target antigen and high levels of complement inhibitors (CD55 and CD59). Differences in frequency or activity of effector cells may also contribute to differences in outcome. Furthermore, the microenvironment protects MM cells to CD38 antibody-induced ADCC by upregulation of anti-apoptotic molecules, such as survivin. Improved understanding of modes of action and mechanisms of resistance has resulted in rationally designed CD38-based combination therapies, which will contribute to further improvement in outcome of MM patients.

Anti-CD38 and anti-SLAMF7: the future of myeloma immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

the high expression of a number of surface antigens on malignant plasma cells, the bone marrow micro-environment and immune effector T cells, makes these appealing targets for immune therapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Areas covered: Two mAbs, anti-CD38 daratumumab (Dara) and anti-SLAMF7 elotuzumab (Elo), have achieved recent regulatory approval for relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM) and are currently being explored as possible treatment options in novel combinations and different settings. This review discusses the current landscape and possible development of anti-CD38 and anti-SLAMF7 mAbs. Expert commentary: Three phase III trials demonstrated a significant advantage in terms of response and PFS when Dara or Elo are combined with lenalidomide-dexamethsone (Rd) or bortezomib-dexamethsone (Vd), in comparison to doublet regimens, for patients with RRMM. Treatment algorithms including Dara- or Elo-based triplets may be defined on the basis of disease and patients' characteristics, as well as of their prior exposure to different classes of novel agents. Evaluation of these agents in new combination regimens, including second and third generation PIs and IMiDs, are under investigation. Moreover, use of mAbs in phases of the disease where the immune system is less compromised, such as newly diagnosed MM or even high-risk smoldering myeloma, appears logical.

CD38-targeting antibodies in multiple myeloma: mechanisms of action and clinical experience

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma (MM) is generally an incurable hematological malignancy with heterogeneous overall survival rates ranging from a few months to more than 10 years. Survival is especially poor for patients who developed disease that is refractory to immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors. Areas covered: This review will discuss the importance of CD38-targeting antibodies for the treatment of MM patients to improve their outcome. Expert commentary: Intense immuno-oncological laboratory research has resulted in the development of functionally active monoclonal antibodies against cell surface markers present on MM cells. In this respect, CD38-targeting antibodies such as daratumumab, MOR202, and isatuximab, have high single agent activity in heavily pretreated MM patients by virtue of their pleiotropic mechanisms of action including Fc-dependent effector mechanisms and immunomodulatory activities. Importantly, CD38-targeting antibodies are well tolerated, with infusion reactions as most frequent adverse event. Altogether, this makes them attractive combination partners with other anti-MM agents. Daratumumab is already approved as monotherapy and in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone as well as bortezomib-dexamethasone in pretreated MM patients. Furthermore, results from studies evaluating CD38-targeting antibodies in newly diagnosed MM patients are also promising, indicating that CD38-targeting antibodies will be broadly used in MM, resulting in further improvements in survival.

Triplet vs. doublet drug regimens for managing multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a complex and heterogeneous plasma cell disorder. Sub-clones present before therapy and clonal evolution during therapy make this disease more resistant and finally refractory. These findings make us aware of the difficulty to target MM with few agents. Multi-drugs therapies allow us to target more pathways and more sub-clones both at diagnosis and in advanced disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors focus on the effectiveness and tolerability of three drug regimens (triplet) in comparison with two drug regimens (doublet) and discuss their implications in the present and future of MM therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

It has been demonstrated that triplet regimens are better than doublet in terms of response rate and PFS in newly diagnosed, relapsed-refractory MM and in most patient subgroups. Whether this translates into OS improvement needs further demonstration. However, achievement of MRD negativity in most newly diagnosed and, firstly, in a consistent proportion of relapsed-refractory MM patients is very encouraging in this respect. However, not all patients are able to tolerate all triplet combinations; therefore, the choice should be based on patient characteristics, besides disease features. Finally, cost of triplets may be an important limitation in some countries.

CD38 antibodies in multiple myeloma: back to the future

CD38 is highly and uniformly expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells, and at relatively low levels on normal lymphoid and myeloid cells, and in some tissues of nonhematopoietic origin. CD38 is a transmembrane glycoprotein with ectoenzymatic activity, and also functions as a receptor and adhesion molecule. Altogether, this has triggered the development of several CD38 antibodies including daratumumab (fully human), isatuximab (chimeric), and MOR202 (fully human). CD38 antibodies have pleiotropic mechanisms of action including Fc-dependent immune-effector mechanisms, direct apoptotic activity, and immunomodulatory effects by the elimination of CD38⁺ immune-suppressor cells. CD38-targeting antibodies are generally well tolerated and induce partial response or better in ∼30% of heavily pretreated MM patients as monotherapy. Based on their distinct mechanisms of action, favorable toxicity profile, and single-agent activity, CD38 antibodies are attractive partners in combination regimens. Indeed, deep responses and prolonged progression-free survival can be achieved in relapsed/refractory MM patients when CD38 antibodies are combined with immunomodulatory agents or proteasome inhibitors. Infusion-related reactions, which typically occur during the first infusion, are the most frequent adverse events. Attention should also be paid to the interference of CD38 antibodies with certain laboratory assays, which may complicate response evaluation and blood compatibility testing. Several studies are currently examining the role of CD38-based therapies in newly diagnosed and high-risk smoldering MM. Furthermore, CD38 antibodies are currently also under investigation in other hematologic malignancies, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, and acute myeloid leukemia, as well as in solid tumors.