1
|
Carr RA, Hsu M, Harrington CA, Tan KS, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Ilson DH, Isbell JM, Janjigian YY, Maron SB, Park BJ, Rusch VW, Sihag S, Wu AJ, Jones DR, Ku GY, Molena D. Induction FOLFOX and PET-Directed Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e538-e544. [PMID: 34387205 PMCID: PMC8840992 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed nCRT, induction CP followed by PET-directed nCRT, and nCRT with CP alone in patients with EAC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA nCRT with CP is a standard treatment for locally advanced EAC. The results of cancer and leukemia group B 80803 support the use of induction chemotherapy followed by PET-directed chemo-radiation therapy. METHODS We retrospectively identified all patients with EAC who underwent the treatments above followed by esophagectomy. We assessed incidences of pathologic complete response (pCR), near-pCR (ypN0 with ≥90% response), and surgical complications between treatment groups using Fisher exact test and logistic regression; disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated using the log-rank test and extended Cox regression. RESULTS In total, 451 patients were included: 309 (69%) received induction chemotherapy before nCRT (FOLFOX, n = 70; CP, n = 239); 142 (31%) received nCRT with CP. Rates of pCR (33% vs. 16%, P = 0.004), near-pCR (57% vs. 33%, P < 0.001), and 2-year DFS (68% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) were higher in the induction FOLFOX group than in the induction CP group. Similarly, the rate of near-pCR (57% vs. 42%, P = 0.04) and 2-year DFS (68% vs. 44%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the FOLFOX group than in the no-induction group. CONCLUSIONS Induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed nCRT may result in better histopathologic response rates and DFS than either induction CP plus PET-directed nCRT or nCRT with CP alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A. Carr
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Caitlin A. Harrington
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David H. Ilson
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yelena Y. Janjigian
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Steven B. Maron
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pointer DT, McDonald JA, Naffouje SA, Mehta R, Fleming JB, Fontaine JP, Lauwers GY, Frakes JM, Hoffe SE, Pimiento JM. The effect of histologic grade on neoadjuvant treatment outcomes in esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:465-478. [PMID: 35578777 PMCID: PMC9339510 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The gold standard for locoregional esophageal cancer (LEC) treatment includes preoperative chemoradiation and surgical resection, with possible perioperative or adjuvant systemic therapy. With few data associating histologic grade and prognosis in LEC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection, we seek to evaluate this association. METHODS Our institutional esophagectomy database between 1999 and 2019 was queried, selecting esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), followed by esophagectomy. Propensity-score matching of low- and high-histologic grade groups was performed to assess survival metrics using initial clinical grade (cG) and final pathologic grade (pG). We performed a multivariable logistic regression to study predictors of pathologic complete response as a secondary objective. RESULTS A total of 518 patients met the inclusion criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the matched dataset showed no difference in initial or 5-year recurrence-free survival or overall survival (OS) between cG1 and cG2 versus cG3 based on original grade. When matched according to pG, cG1-2 had improved median survival parameters compared to cG3, with 5-year OS for cG1-2 of 45% versus 27% (p = 0.001). Higher pG, pathologic N stage, and poor response to NAT are predictors of poor survival. CONCLUSION Patients with post-NAT pG1-2 demonstrated improved survival. Integrating histologic grade into postneoadjuvant staging may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T. Pointer
- Department of General Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Jordan A. McDonald
- University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Samer A. Naffouje
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rutika Mehta
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jason B. Fleming
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jacques P. Fontaine
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gregory Y. Lauwers
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL USA
| | - Jessica M. Frakes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sarah E. Hoffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jose M. Pimiento
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sihag S, Nussenzweig SC, Walch HS, Hsu M, Tan KS, De La Torre S, Janjigian YY, Maron SB, Ku GY, Tang LH, Shah PM, Wu A, Jones DR, Solit DB, Schultz N, Ganesh K, Berger MF, Molena D. The Role of the TP53 Pathway in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:2669-2678. [PMID: 35377946 PMCID: PMC9197876 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-4016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma, response to neoadjuvant therapy strongly predicts survival, but robust molecular predictors of response have been lacking. We therefore sought to discover meaningful predictors of response in these patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We retrospectively identified all patients with adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus or gastroesophageal junction who (i) were treated with multimodality therapy with curative intent at our institution from 2014 through 2020 and (ii) underwent prospective sequencing by Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. Clinicopathologic and genomic data were analyzed to identify potential genomic features, somatic alterations, and oncogenic pathways associated with treatment response. RESULTS In total, 237 patients were included. MDM2 amplification was independently associated with poor response to neoadjuvant therapy [OR, 0.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.55); P = 0.032], when accounting for significant clinicopathologic variables, including clinical stage, tumor grade, and chemotherapy regimen. Moreover, TP53 pathway alterations, grouped according to inferred severity of TP53 dysfunction, were significantly associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.004, q = 0.07). Patients with MDM2 amplifications or truncating biallelic TP53 mutations had similar outcomes in terms of poor responses to neoadjuvant therapy and, consequently, shorter progression-free survival, compared with patients with TP53 pathway wild-type tumors. Thus, worsening TP53 dysfunction was directly correlated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS MDM2 amplification and TP53 status are associated with response to therapy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Given the dearth of actionable targets in esophageal adenocarcinoma, MDM2 inhibition, in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, may represent an important therapeutic strategy to overcome treatment resistance and improve outcomes in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065,Co-Corresponding Authors: Daniela Molena, M.D. 1275 York Avenue, Office C878, New York, NY 10065, 212-639-3970, , Smita Sihag, M.D., M.P.H. 1275 York Avenue, Office C881, New York, NY 10065, 212-639-3309,
| | - Samuel C. Nussenzweig
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Henry S. Walch
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Sergio De La Torre
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Yelena Y. Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Steven B. Maron
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Laura H. Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Pari M. Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Abraham Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - David B. Solit
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Karuna Ganesh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065,Co-Corresponding Authors: Daniela Molena, M.D. 1275 York Avenue, Office C878, New York, NY 10065, 212-639-3970, , Smita Sihag, M.D., M.P.H. 1275 York Avenue, Office C881, New York, NY 10065, 212-639-3309,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dayyani F, Smith BR, Nguyen NT, Daly S, Hinojosa MW, Seyedin SN, Kuo J, Samarasena JB, Lee JG, Taylor TH, Cho MT, Senthil M. A phase Ib feasibility trial of response adapted neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer (RANT-GC). Future Oncol 2022; 18:2615-2622. [PMID: 35603628 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend neoadjuvant (NAC) and/or adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancers (LAGCs). However, the choice and duration of NAC regimen is standardized, rather than personalized to biologic response, despite the availability of several different classes of agents for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). The current trial will use a tumor-informed ctDNA assay (Signatera™) and monitor response to NAC. Based on ctDNA kinetics, the treatment regimen is modified. This is a prospective single center, single arm, open label study in clinical stage IB-III GC. ctDNA is measured at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks. Imaging is performed at the same intervals. The primary endpoint is the feasibility of this approach, defined as percentage of patients completing gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farshid Dayyani
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Brian R Smith
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Ninh T Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Shaun Daly
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Marcelo W Hinojosa
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Steven N Seyedin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Jeffrey Kuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Jason B Samarasena
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - John G Lee
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Thomas H Taylor
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617, USA
| | - May T Cho
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Maheswari Senthil
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Advances in the curative management of oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:706-717. [PMID: 34675397 PMCID: PMC8528946 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01485-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of oesophageal cancer, in particular adenocarcinoma, has markedly increased over the last four decades with adenocarcinoma becoming the dominant subtype in the West, and mortality rates are high. Nevertheless, overall survival of patients with oesophageal cancer has doubled in the past 20 years, with earlier diagnosis and improved treatments benefiting those patients who can be treated with curative intent. Advances in endotherapy, surgical approaches, and multimodal and other combination therapies have been reported. New vistas have emerged in targeted therapies and immunotherapy, informed by new knowledge in genomics and molecular biology, which present opportunities for personalised cancer therapy and novel clinical trials. This review focuses exclusively on the curative intent treatment pathway, and highlights emerging advances.
Collapse
|
6
|
Charalampakis N, Tsakatikas S, Schizas D, Kykalos S, Tolia M, Fioretzaki R, Papageorgiou G, Katsaros I, Abdelhakeem AAF, Sewastjanow-Silva M, Rogers JE, Ajani JA. Trimodality treatment in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers: Current approach and future perspectives. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:181-202. [PMID: 35116110 PMCID: PMC8790425 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i1.181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers represent an aggressive group of malignancies with poor prognosis even when diagnosed in relatively early stage, with an increasing incidence both in Asia and in Western countries. These cancers are characterized by heterogeneity as a result of different pathogenetic mechanisms as shown in recent molecular analyses. Accordingly, the understanding of phenotypic and genotypic correlations/classifications has been improved. Current therapeutic strategies have also advanced and moved beyond surgical extirpation alone, with the incorporation of other treatment modalities, such as radiation and chemotherapy (including biologics). Chemoradiotherapy has been used as postoperative treatment after suboptimal gastrectomy to ensure local disease control but also improvement in survival. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy has been employed to increase the chance of a successful R0 resection and pathologic complete response rate, which is associated with improved long-term outcomes. Several studies have defined various chemotherapy regimens to accompany radiation (before and after surgery). Recently, addition of immunotherapy after trimodality of gastroesophageal cancer has produced an advantage in disease-free interval. Targeted agents used in the metastatic setting are being investigated in the early setting with mixed results. The aim of this review is to summarize the existing data on trimodality approaches for gastric and GEJ cancers, highlight the remaining questions and present the current research effort addressing them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Charalampakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus 18537, Greece
| | - Sergios Tsakatikas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus 18537, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Schizas
- TheFirst Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Stylianos Kykalos
- TheSecond Propedeutic Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Maria Tolia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Crete, Heraklion 71110, Greece
| | - Rodanthi Fioretzaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus 18537, Greece
| | - Georgios Papageorgiou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus 18537, Greece
| | - Ioannis Katsaros
- Department of General Surgery, Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus 18537, Greece
| | - Ahmed Adel Fouad Abdelhakeem
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Matheus Sewastjanow-Silva
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Jane E Rogers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ho F, Torphy RJ, Friedman C, Leong S, Kim S, Wani S, Schefter T, Scott CD, Mitchell JD, Weyant MJ, Meguid RA, Gleisner AL, Goodman KA, McCarter MD. Induction Chemotherapy Plus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:7208-7218. [PMID: 33884489 PMCID: PMC8528883 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09999-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (nCRT) is an accepted treatment regimen for patients with potentially curable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether induction chemotherapy (IC) before nCRT is associated with improved pathologic complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) when compared with patients who received nCRT alone for esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients who received nCRT and curative-intent esophagectomy for esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma from 2006 to 2015 were included. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy start dates were used to define cohorts who received IC before nCRT (IC + nCRT) versus those who only received concurrent nCRT before surgery. Propensity weighting was conducted to balance patient, disease, and facility covariates between groups. RESULTS 12,460 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 11,880 (95%) received nCRT and 580 (5%) received IC + nCRT. Following propensity weighting, OS was significantly improved among patients who received IC + nCRT versus nCRT (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.92; p < 0.001) with median OS for the IC + nCRT cohort of 3.38 years versus 2.45 years for nCRT. For patients diagnosed from 2013 to 2015, IC + nCRT was also associated with higher odds of pCR compared with nCRT (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.14-2.21; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION IC + nCRT was associated with a significant OS benefit as well as higher pCR rate in the more modern patient cohort. These results merit consideration of a sufficiently powered prospective multiinstitutional trial to further evaluate these observed differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ho
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert J Torphy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Chloe Friedman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stephen Leong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sunnie Kim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Tracey Schefter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Christopher D Scott
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - John D Mitchell
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Michael J Weyant
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert A Meguid
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ana L Gleisner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin D McCarter
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Gastrointestinal malignancies encompass a variety of primary tumor sites, each with different staging criteria and treatment approaches. In this review we discuss technical aspects of 18F-FDG-PET/CT scanning to optimize information from both the PET and computed tomography components. Specific applications for 18F-FDG-PET/CT are summarized for initial staging and follow-up of the major disease sites, including esophagus, stomach, hepatobiliary system, pancreas, colon, rectum, and anus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon A Howard
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotheranostics, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3949, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Terence Z Wong
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotheranostics, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3949, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yoon HH, Ou FS, Soori GS, Shi Q, Wigle DA, Sticca RP, Miller RC, Leenstra JL, Peller PJ, Ginos B, Heying E, Wu TT, Drevyanko TF, Ko S, Mattar BI, Nikcevich DA, Behrens RJ, Khalil MF, Kim GP, Alberts SR. Induction versus no induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a multicentre randomised phase II trial (NCCTG N0849 [Alliance]). Eur J Cancer 2021; 150:214-223. [PMID: 33934058 PMCID: PMC8154661 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM report primary results from the first multicentre randomised trial evaluating induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy in patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Notably, recent data from a single-institution randomised trial reported that induction chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours. METHODS In this phase 2 trial (28 centres in the U.S. NCI-sponsored North Central Cancer Treatment Group [Alliance]), trimodality-eligible patients (T3-4N0, TanyN+) were randomised to receive induction (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine; Arm A) or no induction chemotherapy (Arm B) followed by oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/radiation and subsequent surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response (pathCR). Secondary/exploratory endpoints were OS and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Of 55 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, the pathCR rate was 28.6% (8/28) in A versus 40.7% (11/27) in B (P = .34). Given interim results indicating futility, accrual was terminated, but patients were followed. After a median follow-up of 60.4 months, a longer median OS in Arm A versus B was unexpectedly observed (3-year rates 57.1% versus 41.7%, respectively) driven by longer DFS after margin-free surgery. In posthoc analysis, induction (versus no induction) chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer OS and DFS among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours, but not among patients with poorly/undifferentiated tumours (Pinteraction = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS Adding induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy did not improve the primary endpoint, pathCR. However, induction chemotherapy was associated with longer median OS, particularly among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours. These findings may inform further development of curative-intent trials in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Brenda Ginos
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Erica Heying
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maged F Khalil
- Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, PA, USA.
| | - George P Kim
- 21(st) Century Oncology of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kastelowitz N, Marsh MD, McCarter M, Meguid RA, Bhardwaj NW, Mitchell JD, Weyant MJ, Scott C, Schefter T, Stumpf P, Leong S, Messersmith W, Lieu C, Leal AD, Davis SL, Purcell WT, Kane M, Wani S, Shah R, Hammad H, Edmundowicz S, Goodman KA. Impact of Radiation Dose on Postoperative Complications in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers. Front Oncol 2021; 11:614640. [PMID: 33777751 PMCID: PMC7987936 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.614640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The impact of radiation prescription dose on postoperative complications during standard of care trimodality therapy for operable stage II-III esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers has not been established. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers treated between 2004 and 2016 with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection at a single institution. Post-operative complications within 30 days were reviewed and scored using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Results were compared between patients treated with <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy, as well as to published CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation group data (41.4 Gy). Results: Twenty-nine patients were treated with <50 Gy (range 39.6-46.8 Gy) and 53 patients were treated with ≥ 50 Gy (range 50.0-52.5 Gy) delivered using IMRT/VMAT (41%), 3D-CRT (46%), or tomotherapy IMRT (12%). Complication rates and CCI scores between our <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy groups were not significantly different. Assuming a normal distribution of the CROSS data, there was no significant difference in CCI scores between the CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation, <50 Gy, or ≥ 50 Gy groups. Rates of pulmonary complications were greater in the CROSS group (50%) than our <50 Gy (38%) or ≥ 50 Gy (30%) groups. Conclusions: In selected esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients, radiation doses ≥ 50 Gy do not appear to increase 30 day post-operative complication rates. These findings suggest that the use of definitive doses of radiotherapy (50-50.4 Gy) in the neoadjuvant setting may not increase post-operative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Kastelowitz
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Megan D. Marsh
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Martin McCarter
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Robert A. Meguid
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | | | - John D. Mitchell
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Michael J. Weyant
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christopher Scott
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Tracey Schefter
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Priscilla Stumpf
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Stephen Leong
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Wells Messersmith
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christopher Lieu
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Alexis D. Leal
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - S. Lindsey Davis
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | | | - Madeleine Kane
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Sachin Wani
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Raj Shah
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Hazem Hammad
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | | | - Karyn A. Goodman
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Du VX, Groth SS. Commentary: Adjuvant chemotherapy after trimodal therapy for esophageal carcinoma: A bitter pill to swallow. JTCVS OPEN 2021; 5:150-151. [PMID: 36003186 PMCID: PMC9390313 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2020.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
12
|
Cummings D, Wong J, Palm R, Hoffe S, Almhanna K, Vignesh S. Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Staging and Multimodal Therapy of Esophageal and Gastric Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:582. [PMID: 33540736 PMCID: PMC7867245 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric and esophageal tumors are diverse neoplasms that involve mucosal and submucosal tissue layers and include squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, spindle cell neoplasms, neuroendocrine tumors, marginal B cell lymphomas, along with less common tumors. The worldwide burden of esophageal and gastric malignancies is significant, with esophageal and gastric cancer representing the ninth and fifth most common cancers, respectively. The approach to diagnosis and staging of these lesions is multimodal and includes a combination of gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and cross-sectional imaging. Likewise, therapy is multidisciplinary and combines therapeutic endoscopy, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapeutic tools. Future directions for diagnosis of esophageal and gastric malignancies are evolving rapidly and will involve advances in endoscopic and endosonographic techniques including tethered capsules, optical coherence tomography, along with targeted cytologic and serological analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donelle Cummings
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York Medical College, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation-Metropolitan Hospital Center, 1901 First Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Joyce Wong
- Division of Surgery, Mid Atlantic Kaiser Permanente, 700 2nd St. NE, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20002, USA;
| | - Russell Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (R.P.); (S.H.)
| | - Sarah Hoffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (R.P.); (S.H.)
| | - Khaldoun Almhanna
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St, George 312, Providence, RI 02903, USA;
| | - Shivakumar Vignesh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, MSC 1196, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Multimodality approaches to control esophageal cancer: development of chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Esophagus 2021; 18:25-32. [PMID: 32964312 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-020-00782-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer has a poor prognosis despite the fact that surgical techniques have been advanced and optimized, and systemic multimodality approaches have progressed recently. Adding chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy to the basic surgical approach have been shown to have therapeutic benefit for esophageal cancer. This review describes the latest development of chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, which have contributed to the reduction in esophageal cancer growth and improved the survival of patients. Chemoradiation is a treatment option for resectable esophageal cancer to preserve the esophagus for patients who cannot tolerate surgery. Moreover, a combination of chemoradiotherapy and salvage surgery could extend the survival of patients. The effects of a triplet chemotherapy regimen are currently being verified in some Phase III studies for unresectable advanced/recurrent esophageal cancer. In addition, with the great promise of immune checkpoint inhibitors, strategies that incorporate the use of immunotherapy may shift from the metastatic setting to the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting as a result of clinical trials. More precise comprehension of the molecular biology of esophageal cancer is expected to further control disease progression using multimodality treatments in the future.
Collapse
|
14
|
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Using Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (PF) Versus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CROSS Regimen) for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC): A Propensity Score-matched Study. Ann Surg 2020; 272:779-785. [PMID: 32833766 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study compared the efficacy of PF-based and CROSS-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for ESCC. BACKGROUND PF-based regimen has been a standard regimen for ESCC, but it has been replaced by the CROSS regimen in the past few years, despite no prospective head-to-head comparative study has been performed. METHODS This is a single center retrospective study. Records of all ESCC patients who have received neoadjuvant PF with 40 Gy radiotherapy in 20 daily fractions (PFRT Group) or CROSS with 41.4 Gy radiotherapy in 23 daily fractions (CROSS Group) during the period 2002 to 2019 were retrieved. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to minimize baseline differences. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival and clinicopathological response. Subgroup analysis ("CROSS Eligibility") was performed based on tumor length, cT-stage, cM-stage, age, and performance status. RESULTS One hundred (out of 109) patients (CROSS group) and propensity score matched 100 (out of 210) patients (PFRT group) were included. Esophagectomy rates in CROSS and PFRT group were 69% and 76%, respectively (P = 0.268). R0 resection rates were 85.5% and 81.6% (P = 0.525) and the pathological complete remission rates were 24.6% and 35.5% (P = 0.154). By intention-to-treat, the median survival was 16.7 and 32.7 months (P = 0.083). For "CROSS Eligible subgroup," the median survival of the CROSS and PFRT group was 21.6 versus 44.9 months (P = 0.093). CONCLUSIONS There is no statistically difference in survival or clinicopathological outcome between both groups, but the trend favors PFRT. Prospective head-to-head comparison and novel strategies to improve the outcomes in resectable ESCC are warranted.
Collapse
|
15
|
Cong E, Oar AJ, Lee MT, Chicco A, Lin M, Yap J, Lin P, Ho Shon I. Novel 5-point 18-FDG-PET/CT visual scoring system for assessing treatment response in patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 65:23-37. [PMID: 33063470 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic utility and reproducibility of a qualitative 5-point 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET primary visual score (PVS) in patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancer. METHODS This was a retrospective review of patients with histologically proven oesophageal or GOJ cancer who received curative intent therapy. Clinical, pathological and imaging data were extracted from electronic medical records. Patients were required to have pre-treatment and post-treatment FDG-PET scans, that were evaluated with a 5-point primary visual score (prePVS, postPVS). The changes in PVS (ΔPVS) were correlated with progression-free survival and overall survival. Interobserver variability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa intraclass correlation and agreement. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients were retrospectively identified. Two (3%), 36 (54%) and 29 (43%) of the patients had stage I, II and III disease respectively. Twenty-five (37%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-seven (55%) patients proceeded onto surgical resection. postPVS was associated with both PFS (P = 0.013) and OS (P = 0.0002). ΔPVS predicted for PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.0003). When thresholds of response were considered, agreement was 80.6% (K = 0.78) and 74.6% (K = 0.69) for postPVS and ΔPVS respectively. CONCLUSION Qualitative assessment of oesophageal and GOJ cancers utilising FDG-PET is reproducible and may be able to prognosticate outcomes in patients undergoing treatment. Prospective validation is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Cong
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J Oar
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Icon Cancer Therapy Centre, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mark T Lee
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Chicco
- Department of Medical Physics, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Lin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - June Yap
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Lin
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ivan Ho Shon
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Roy AC, Shapiro J, Burge M, Karapetis CS, Pavlakis N, Segelov E, Chau I, Lordick F, Chen LT, Barbour A, Tebbutt N, Price T. Management of early-stage gastro-esophageal cancers: expert perspectives from the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) with invited international faculty. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:305-324. [PMID: 32202178 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1746185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: A multimodal approach in operable early-stage oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer has evolved in the last decade, leading to improvement in overall outcomes.Areas covered: A review of the published literature and conference abstracts was undertaken on the topic of optimal adjunctive chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in early-stage OG cancers. This review article focuses on the current evidence pertaining to neoadjuvant and perioperative strategies in curable OG cancers including the evolving landscape of immunotherapy and targeted drugs in this setting.Expert commentary: Adjunctive therapies in the form of preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) or chemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy over surgery alone improve outcomes in patients with operable OG cancer. Although there are variations in practice around the world, a multi-disciplinary approach to patient care is of paramount importance. Immunotherapy and on treatment functional imaging are two examples of emerging strategies to improve the outcome for early-stage patients. A better understanding of the molecular biology of this disease may help overcome the problem of tumor heterogeneity and enable more rationally designed and targeted therapeutic interventions in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amitesh C Roy
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia
| | | | - Matt Burge
- Department of Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane Hospital, University Of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Christos S Karapetis
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia
| | - Nick Pavlakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eva Segelov
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash University and Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ian Chau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, London, UK
| | - Florian Lordick
- Leipzig University Medical Centre, University Cancer Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Li-Tong Chen
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Andrew Barbour
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Niall Tebbutt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Tim Price
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Barbour A, Walpole E, Mai G, Barnes E, Watson D, Ackland S, Martin J, Burge M, Finch R, Karapetis C, Shannon J, Nott L, Varma S, Marx G, Falk G, Gebski V, Oostendorp M, Wilson K, Thomas J, Lampe G, Zalcberg J, Simes J, Smithers B, Barbour A, Simes J, Walpole E, Mai T, Watson D, Karapetis C, Gebski V, Barnes L, Oostendorp M, Wilson K. Preoperative cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel with or without radiotherapy after poor early response to cisplatin and fluorouracil for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma (AGITG DOCTOR): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:236-245. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
18
|
Worrell SG, Linden PA. ASO Author Reflections: More May Not Be Better. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:509-510. [PMID: 31673943 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08021-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie G Worrell
- Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Philip A Linden
- Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Greally M, Ilson DH. Neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: Who, when, and what? Cancer 2019; 124:4276-4278. [PMID: 30500084 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Greally
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David H Ilson
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Maron SB, Chase LM, Lomnicki S, Kochanny S, Moore KL, Joshi SS, Landron S, Johnson J, Kiedrowski LA, Nagy RJ, Lanman RB, Kim ST, Lee J, Catenacci DVT. Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing Analysis of Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:7098-7112. [PMID: 31427281 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) has a poor prognosis and few therapeutic options. Utilizing a 73-gene plasma-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA-NGS) test, we sought to evaluate the role of ctDNA-NGS in guiding clinical decision-making in GEA. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We evaluated a large cohort (n = 2,140 tests; 1,630 patients) of ctDNA-NGS results (including 369 clinically annotated patients). Patients were assessed for genomic alteration (GA) distribution and correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS Treatment history, tumor site, and disease burden dictated tumor-DNA shedding and consequent ctDNA-NGS maximum somatic variant allele frequency. Patients with locally advanced disease having detectable ctDNA postoperatively experienced inferior median disease-free survival (P = 0.03). The genomic landscape was similar but not identical to tissue-NGS, reflecting temporospatial molecular heterogeneity, with some targetable GAs identified at higher frequency via ctDNA-NGS compared with previous primary tumor-NGS cohorts. Patients with known microsatellite instability-high (MSI-High) tumors were robustly detected with ctDNA-NGS. Predictive biomarker assessment was optimized by incorporating tissue-NGS and ctDNA-NGS assessment in a complementary manner. HER2 inhibition demonstrated a profound survival benefit in HER2-amplified patients by ctDNA-NGS and/or tissue-NGS (median overall survival, 26.3 vs. 7.4 months; P = 0.002), as did EGFR inhibition in EGFR-amplified patients (median overall survival, 21.1 vs. 14.4 months; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS ctDNA-NGS characterized GEA molecular heterogeneity and rendered important prognostic and predictive information, complementary to tissue-NGS.See related commentary by Frankell and Smyth, p. 6893.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven B Maron
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Leah M Chase
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Sara Kochanny
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kelly L Moore
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Smita S Joshi
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stacie Landron
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Julie Johnson
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lesli A Kiedrowski
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Rebecca J Nagy
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Richard B Lanman
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Greally M, Agarwal R, Ilson DH. Optimal management of gastroesophageal junction cancer. Cancer 2019; 125:1990-2001. [PMID: 30973648 PMCID: PMC10172875 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Although recent decades have witnessed incremental improvements in the treatment of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) carcinoma, outcomes remain modest. For locally advanced esophageal cancer, the addition of chemotherapy and/or radiation to surgery is considered the standard of care. Chemotherapy remains the primary treatment for metastatic disease and improves survival over best supportive care. However, the prognosis for patients with GEJ cancers, which are treated along the same paradigms as esophageal and gastric carcinomas, remain poor because of the emergence of chemoresistance and limited targeted therapeutic approaches, which include agents that target the HER2 and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways. Evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the chemorefractory setting have confirmed the activity of immunotherapy in esophagogastric cancer. Ongoing immunotherapeutic strategies are being evaluated in both the locally advanced and metastatic settings. This review focuses on the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic GEJ carcinomas, which encompass all tumors that have an epicenter within 5 cm proximal or distal to the anatomical Z-line (Siewert classification). Because the vast majority of GEJ tumors are adenocarcinoma, the management of adenocarcinoma is the focus of this review. Evolving approaches and areas of clinical equipoise are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Greally
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rajiv Agarwal
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David H Ilson
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Lu SL, Hsu FM, Tsai CL, Lee JM, Huang PM, Hsu CH, Lin CC, Chang YL, Hsieh MS, Cheng JCH. Improved prognosis with induction chemotherapy in pathological complete responders after trimodality treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Hypothesis generating for adjuvant treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1498-1504. [PMID: 30910457 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the locations of recurrences and survival outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without preceding induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by esophagectomy. METHODS Among 276 patients with locally advanced ESCC undergoing trimodality treatment during 2004-2014, 94 (34.1%) with pCR were eligible. The cohort included 26 patients undergoing IC before CCRT (IC group), and 68 patients who did not receive IC (non-IC group). RESULTS At a median follow-up of 51.4 months (95% confidence interval; 42.9-62.1), 19 patients experienced recurrences. There was a trend toward fewer distant failures in the IC group (0% vs.14.7%, p = 0.057), while locoregional recurrence was similar (7.7% vs. 7.4%). IC was associated with significantly improved survivals with the 5-year RFS and OS rates for the IC group of 85.1% and 90.5%, respectively, compared to of 46.2% and 48.1% for the non-IC group (p = 0.008 for RFS, and p = 0.015 for OS). By multivariable analyses, IC remained the only significant factor associated with survivals (HR:0.18 for RFS, p = 0.020 and HR:0.18 for OS, p = 0.025). The effect of IC in the whole cohort, irrespective of pathological response, was also assessed. Patients with non-pCR in the IC group had a trend toward worse survivals compared to the non-IC group CONCLUSIONS: In ESCC patients with pCR after trimodality treatment, IC was associated with favorable survivals. The benefits of IC might be a hypothesis generation for adjuvant treatment for patients with pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shao-Lun Lu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Feng-Ming Hsu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Chiao-Ling Tsai
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Jang-Ming Lee
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Ming Huang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hung Hsu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chi Lin
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Yih-Leong Chang
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Min-Shu Hsieh
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Greally M, Chou JF, Molena D, Rusch VW, Bains MS, Park BJ, Wu AJ, Goodman KA, Kelsen DP, Janjigian YY, Ilson DH, Ku GY. Positron-Emission Tomography Scan-Directed Chemoradiation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: No Benefit for a Change in Chemotherapy in Positron-Emission Tomography Nonresponders. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14:540-546. [PMID: 30391577 PMCID: PMC6640852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preoperative or definitive chemoradiation is an accepted treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The MUNICON study showed that positron-emission tomography (PET) response following induction chemotherapy was predictive of outcomes in patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. We evaluated the predictive value of PET following induction chemotherapy in ESCC patients and assessed the impact of changing chemotherapy during radiation in PET nonresponders. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients with locally advanced ESCC who received induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation; all patients had a PET before and after induction chemotherapy. Survival was calculated from date of repeat PET using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared between groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS Of 111 patients, 70 (63%) were PET responders (defined as a 35% or more decrease in maximum standard uptake value) to induction chemotherapy. PET responders received the same chemotherapy during radiation. Of 41 PET nonresponders, 16 continued with the same chemotherapy and 25 were changed to alternative chemotherapy with radiation. Median progression-free survival (70.1 months versus 7.1 months, p < 0.01) and overall survival (84.8 months versus 17.2 months, p < 0.01) were improved for PET responders versus nonresponders. Median progression-free survival and overall survival for PET nonresponders who changed chemotherapy versus those who did not were 6.4 months versus 8.3 months (p = 0.556) and 14.1 versus 17.2 months (p = 0.81), respectively. CONCLUSIONS PET after induction chemotherapy highly predicts for outcomes in ESCC patients who receive chemoradiation. However, our results suggest that PET nonresponders do not benefit from changing chemotherapy during radiation. Future trials should use PET nonresponse after induction chemotherapy to identify poor prognosis patients for novel therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Greally
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Joanne F Chou
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David P Kelsen
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yelena Y Janjigian
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David H Ilson
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Geoffrey Y Ku
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sada YH, Smaglo BG, Tan JC, Tran Cao HS, Musher BL, Massarweh NN. Prognostic Value of Nodal Response After Preoperative Treatment of Gastric Adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17:161-168. [PMID: 30787129 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: Pathologically positive lymph nodes (ypN+) after preoperative chemotherapy are associated with poor survival in patients with gastric cancer. Little is known about the association between response to preoperative therapy and the benefit of postoperative therapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database included patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) gastric cancer treated with preoperative therapy followed by surgery (2006-2014). Preoperative treatment modality was categorized as the inclusion of radiation therapy (RT) or chemotherapy alone. Pretreatment clinical and pathologic stages were used to determine pathologic treatment response rates. The association between overall risk of death and preoperative treatment, disease response, and adjuvant therapy use was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression. Results: Preoperative RT was used in 53.6% of 1,976 patients with cN+ gastric cancer, (74.3% cardia and 10.1% noncardia). The nodal response rate was 38.9% and was higher with RT than with chemotherapy alone (cardia, 46.0% vs 29.1%; P<.001; noncardia, 43.8% vs 31.9%; P=.06). Preoperative RT was associated with an approximate 2-fold increase in the odds of pathologic response compared with chemotherapy. Overall, use of adjuvant therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of death. A primary tumor response with residual nodal disease was not associated with survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.66-1.60). However, a nodal response with residual primary disease was significantly associated with survival (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.65). Conclusions: More than one-third of node-positive gastric cancers showed pathologic nodal response with preoperative treatment. RT is associated with a higher response than chemotherapy. Patients with ypN+ disease have worse survival, regardless of whether they receive postoperative therapy. Future gastric cancer trials should evaluate the role of preoperative RT and individualize postoperative therapy use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne H Sada
- aCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.,bDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Brandon G Smaglo
- bDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Joy C Tan
- cBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- dDepartment of Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Nader N Massarweh
- aCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.,dDepartment of Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Press RH, Shu HKG, Shim H, Mountz JM, Kurland BF, Wahl RL, Jones EF, Hylton NM, Gerstner ER, Nordstrom RJ, Henderson L, Kurdziel KA, Vikram B, Jacobs MA, Holdhoff M, Taylor E, Jaffray DA, Schwartz LH, Mankoff DA, Kinahan PE, Linden HM, Lambin P, Dilling TJ, Rubin DL, Hadjiiski L, Buatti JM. The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1219-1235. [PMID: 29966725 PMCID: PMC6348006 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Modern radiation therapy is delivered with great precision, in part by relying on high-resolution multidimensional anatomic imaging to define targets in space and time. The development of quantitative imaging (QI) modalities capable of monitoring biologic parameters could provide deeper insight into tumor biology and facilitate more personalized clinical decision-making. The Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) was established by the National Cancer Institute to advance and validate these QI modalities in the context of oncology clinical trials. In particular, the QIN has significant interest in the application of QI to widen the therapeutic window of radiation therapy. QI modalities have great promise in radiation oncology and will help address significant clinical needs, including finer prognostication, more specific target delineation, reduction of normal tissue toxicity, identification of radioresistant disease, and clearer interpretation of treatment response. Patient-specific QI is being incorporated into radiation treatment design in ways such as dose escalation and adaptive replanning, with the intent of improving outcomes while lessening treatment morbidities. This review discusses the current vision of the QIN, current areas of investigation, and how the QIN hopes to enhance the integration of QI into the practice of radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H. Press
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hui-Kuo G. Shu
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hyunsuk Shim
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - James M. Mountz
- Dept. of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | - Ella F. Jones
- Dept. of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nola M. Hylton
- Dept. of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Elizabeth R. Gerstner
- Dept. of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lori Henderson
- Cancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Radiation Research Program/Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Michael A. Jacobs
- Dept. of Radiology and Radiological Science, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD
| | - Matthias Holdhoff
- Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD
| | - Edward Taylor
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - David A. Jaffray
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - David A. Mankoff
- Dept. of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Philippe Lambin
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas J. Dilling
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - John M. Buatti
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hong JC, Cui Y, Patel BN, Rushing CN, Faught AM, Eng JS, Higgins K, Yin FF, Das S, Czito BG, Willett CG, Palta M. Association of Interim FDG-PET Imaging During Chemoradiation for Squamous Anal Canal Carcinoma With Recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1046-1051. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
28
|
Tandberg DJ, Cui Y, Rushing CN, Hong JC, Ackerson BG, Marin D, Zhang X, Czito BG, Willett CW, Palta M. Intratreatment Response Assessment With 18F-FDG PET: Correlation of Semiquantitative PET Features With Pathologic Response of Esophageal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1002-1007. [PMID: 30055238 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 06/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This prospective study seeks to extract semiquantitative positron emission tomography (PET) features from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET scans performed before and during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer and to compare their accuracy in predicting histopathologic response. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2012 to 2016, 26 patients with esophageal cancer underwent pretreatment and intratreatment PET scans during chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Median patient age was 63 years (interquartile range, 58-68 years); 26 patients had esophageal adenocarcinoma, and 3 had esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The intratreatment PET scan was performed at a median of 32.4 Gy (interquartile range, 30.6-32.4 Gy). PET features of the primary site including maximum standardized uptake value (SUV), SUV mean, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis were extracted from the pretreatment and intratreatment PET scans. Patients were histopathologic responders if there was complete or near-complete tumor response by modified Ryan scheme. Mean values of PET features were compared between histopathologic responders and nonresponders. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare the accuracy of PET features in predicting histopathologic response. RESULTS Eleven patients (42%) were histopathologic responders. PET features most discriminatory of histopathologic response on AUC analysis were volumetric PET features from the intratreatment PET including metabolic tumor volume based on manual contour (AUC, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.93) and total lesion glycolysis based on semiautomatic 40% SUV threshold (AUC, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.94). CONCLUSIONS Volumetric PET features from the intratreatment PET were the most accurate predictors of histopathologic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Tandberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christel N Rushing
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Julian C Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bradley G Ackerson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniele Marin
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Xuenfeng Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher W Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Adenis A, Lordick F. Questions About a Clinical Trial Evaluating the Addition of Cetuximab to Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy With Paclitaxel and Cisplatin for Patients With Esophageal Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4:887-888. [DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Adenis
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ilson DH. Is there a future for EGFR targeted agents in esophageal cancer? Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1343-1344. [PMID: 29668836 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D H Ilson
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Solomon BL, Garrido-Laguna I. Upper gastrointestinal malignancies in 2017: current perspectives and future approaches. Future Oncol 2018; 14:947-962. [PMID: 29542354 PMCID: PMC5925434 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4) has resulted in unprecedented long-term remissions of unresectable cancers. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors was recently demonstrated in gastrointestinal malignancies with mismatch repair deficiencies (dMMR). Pembrolizumab became the first tissue-agnostic US FDA-approved drug based on the presence of the predictive biomarker dMMR. In addition, the FDA in 2017 approved pembrolizumab for PD-L1-positive advanced gastric cancer in third-line and second-line hepatocellular therapy. Novel treatment strategies such as using anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) bispecific T cells have led to remarkable responses in microsatellite instability-low colorectal cancer. Other major breakthroughs in treating upper gastrointestinal malignancies in 2017 are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L Solomon
- Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Oncology), University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA
| | - Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
- Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Oncology), University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA
- Center for Investigational Therapeutics at Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET-CT as a prognostic marker in advanced biliary tract cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2018; 39:252-259. [DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
33
|
Davidson M, Chau I. Multimodality treatment of operable gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: evaluating neoadjuvant, adjuvant and perioperative approaches. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:327-338. [PMID: 29431018 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1438271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment patterns for locally advanced operable gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma vary, with the optimal approach an area of debate within oncology. Strategies for treatment include a variety of neo-adjuvant, adjuvant and peri-operative regimens involving differing chemotherapy and radiotherapy combinations. Areas covered: This review will critically appraise the evidence base underpinning the main treatment approaches in operable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma, highlighting variations in treatment by factors such as geographical area and primary tumor site. Expert commentary: The expert commentary will focus on the optimal evidence-based approaches for clinicians at the present time and explore how increased understanding of the molecular and genetic determinants of the disease may lead to refinements in treatment through the development of both biomarker-driven approaches and the application of novel targeted and immune-modulating agents to early treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Davidson
- a Department of Medical Oncology , The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Sutton , UK
| | - Ian Chau
- a Department of Medical Oncology , The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Sutton , UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Harada K, Wang X, Shimodaira Y, Sagebiel T, Bhutani MS, Lee JH, Weston B, Elimova E, Lin Q, Amlashi FG, Mizrak Kaya D, Lopez A, Blum Murphy MA, Roth JA, Swisher SG, Skinner HD, Hofstetter WL, Rogers JE, Thomas I, Maru DM, Komaki R, Walsh G, Ajani JA. Early Metabolic Change after Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Histologic Response and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Target Oncol 2018; 13:99-106. [PMID: 29218623 PMCID: PMC5826863 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-017-0540-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early metabolic response after preoperative induction chemotherapy (IC) appears to predict histologic response and prognosis in esophageal cancer (EC), but the usefulness of this approach needs further development. OBJECTIVE We evaluated metabolic response after one cycle of IC using positron emission tomography (PET) to correlate PET response and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed PET data from a randomized phase 2 trial (NCT00525915) of chemoradiation and surgery with or without IC for the treatment of EC. PET was performed at baseline, after one cycle of IC, and 5-7 weeks after chemoradiation. The relationship between PET response (≥35% reduction in standardized uptake value [SUV]) after IC and treatment response was analyzed. RESULTS In 63 patients who received IC, the mean initial SUVmax prior to treatment was 11.9 ± 8.04 and mean SUVmax after one cycle of IC was 6.47 ± 4.45. The mean SUV reduction after IC was 39.3%. Eleven of 37 PET responders achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR), but only two of 22 PET non-responders did (univariate logistic regression; odds ratio: 4.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.83-21.77; p = 0.08). PET responders to IC had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than PET nonresponders (log-rank p = 0.009). PET response after chemoradiation was not correlated with OS (log-rank p = 0.15). CONCLUSION Early PET response after IC is prognostic, but subsequent PET changes (for example, after chemoradiation) are not prognostic. Early PET response might have the potential of predicting pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuto Harada
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yusuke Shimodaira
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Tara Sagebiel
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian Weston
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elena Elimova
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Quan Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Fatemeh G Amlashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Dilsa Mizrak Kaya
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Anthony Lopez
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Mariela A Blum Murphy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jack A Roth
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heath D Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jane E Rogers
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Irene Thomas
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Dipen M Maru
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ritsuko Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Garrett Walsh
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gerbaudo VH, Killoran JH, Kim CK, Hornick JL, Nowak JA, Enzinger PC, Mamon HJ. Pilot study of serial FLT and FDG-PET/CT imaging to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of esophageal adenocarcinoma: correlation with histopathologic response. Ann Nucl Med 2018; 32:165-174. [PMID: 29332233 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-018-1229-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this prospective pilot study was to investigate the potential of serial FLT-PET/CT compared to FDG-PET/CT to provide an early indication of esophageal cancer response to concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. METHODS Five patients with biopsy-proven esophageal adenocarcinomas underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (Tx) prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy. The presence of residual tumor was classified histologically using the Mandard et al. criteria, categorizing patients as pathologic responders and non-responders. Participants underwent PET/CT imaging 1 h after intravenous administration of FDG and of FLT on two separate days within 48 h of each other. Each patient underwent a total of 3 scan "pairs": (1) pre-treatment, (2) during treatment, and (3) post-treatment. Image-based response to therapy was measured in terms of changes in SUVmax (ΔSUV) between pre- and post-therapeutic FLT- and FDG-PET scans. The PET imaging findings were correlated with the pathology results after surgery. RESULTS All tumors were FDG and FLT avid at baseline. Lesion FLT uptake was lower than with FDG. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation resulted in a reduction of tumor uptake of both radiotracers in pathological responders (n = 3) and non-responders (n = 2). While the difference in the reduction in mean tumor FLT uptake during Tx between responders (ΔSUV = - 55%) and non-responders (ΔSUV = - 29%) was significant (P = 0.007), for FDG it was not, [responders had a mean ΔSUV = - 39 vs. - 31% for non-responders (P = 0.74)]. The difference in the reduction in tumor FLT uptake at the end of treatment between responders (ΔSUV = - 62%) and non-responders (ΔSUV = - 57%) was not significant (P = 0.54), while for FDG there was a trend toward significance [ΔSUV of responders = - 74 vs. - 52% in non-responders (P = 0.06)]. CONCLUSION The results of this prospective pilot study suggest that early changes in tumor FLT uptake may be better than FDG in predicting response of esophageal adenocarcinomas to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. These preliminary results support the need to corroborate the value of FLT-PET/CT in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor H Gerbaudo
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Joseph H Killoran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Chun K Kim
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason L Hornick
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jonathan A Nowak
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Peter C Enzinger
- Center for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Harvey J Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
- Center for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Blum Murphy M, Xiao L, Patel VR, Maru DM, Correa AM, G Amlashi F, Liao Z, Komaki R, Lin SH, Skinner HD, Vaporciyan A, Walsh GL, Swisher SG, Sepesi B, Lee JH, Bhutani MS, Weston B, Hofstetter WL, Ajani JA. Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survival-The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer 2017; 123:4106-4113. [PMID: 28885712 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reports are limited regarding clinical and pretreatment features that might predict a pathological complete response (pathCR) after treatment in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). This might allow patient selection for different strategies. This study examines the association of a pathCR with pretreatment variables, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and patterns of recurrence in a large cohort from a single institution. METHODS The baseline clinical features of 911 consecutive patients with EC who were treated with trimodality therapy from January 2000 to November 2013 were analyzed. A pathCR was defined as a surgical specimen with no residual carcinoma (primary or nodes). Logistic regressions were used to identify independent baseline features associated with a pathCR. We applied log-rank testing and Cox models to determine the association between a pathCR and the time-to-event outcomes (OS and RFS). RESULTS Of 911 patients, 218 (23.9%) achieved a pathCR. The pathCR rate was 23.1% for adenocarcinoma and 32.2% for squamous cell carcinoma. A lower pathCR rate was observed for 1) older patients (>60 years), 2) patients with poorly differentiated tumors, 3) patients with signet ring cells (SRCs), and 4) patients with a higher T stage. Patients with a pathCR had longer OS and RFS than those without a pathCR (P = .0021 and P = .0011, respectively). Recurrences occurred more in non-pathCR patients. Distant metastases were the most common type of recurrence. PathCR patients developed brain metastases at a marginally higher rate than non-pathCR patients (P = .051). CONCLUSIONS In this large cohort study, a pathCR is confirmed to be associated with better OS and RFS. The presence of a poorly differentiated tumor or SRCs reduces the likelihood of a pathCR. Future research should focus on molecular classifiers. Cancer 2017;123:4106-4113. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariela Blum Murphy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lianchum Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Viren R Patel
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dipen M Maru
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Arlene M Correa
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fatemeh G Amlashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ritsuko Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heath D Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ara Vaporciyan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Garrett L Walsh
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Boris Sepesi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian Weston
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Oesophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide and is therefore a major global health challenge. The two major subtypes of oesophageal cancer are oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), which are epidemiologically and biologically distinct. OSCC accounts for 90% of all cases of oesophageal cancer globally and is highly prevalent in the East, East Africa and South America. OAC is more common in developed countries than in developing countries. Preneoplastic lesions are identifiable for both OSCC and OAC; these are frequently amenable to endoscopic ablative therapies. Most patients with oesophageal cancer require extensive treatment, including chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and/or surgical resection. Patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal cancer are treated with palliative chemotherapy; those who are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive may also benefit from trastuzumab treatment. Immuno-oncology therapies have also shown promising early results in OSCC and OAC. In this Primer, we review state-of-the-art knowledge on the biology and treatment of oesophageal cancer, including screening, endoscopic ablative therapies and emerging molecular targets, and we discuss best practices in chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, surgery and the maintenance of patient quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C. Smyth
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton. United Kingdom
| | - Jesper Lagergren
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, United Kingdom
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, University Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Manish A. Shah
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York. United States
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Surgical care science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Sutton. United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|