1
|
Arai H, Yang Y, Baca Y, Millstein J, Denda T, Ou FS, Innocenti F, Takeda H, Kubota Y, Doi A, Horie Y, Umemoto K, Izawa N, Wang J, Battaglin F, Jayachandran P, Algaze S, Soni S, Zhang W, Goldberg RM, Hall MJ, Scott AJ, Hwang JJ, Lou E, Weinberg BA, Marshall J, Goel S, Xiu J, Michael Korn W, Venook AP, Sunakawa Y, Lenz HJ. Predictive value of CDC37 gene expression for targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2024; 201:113914. [PMID: 38359495 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CDC37 is a key determinant of client kinase recruitment to the HSP90 chaperoning system. We hypothesized that kinase-specific dependency on CDC37 alters the efficacy of targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Two independent mCRC cohorts were analyzed to compare the survival outcomes between CDC37-high and CDC37-low patients (stratified by the median cutoff values): the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial (226 and 207 patients receiving first-line bevacizumab- and cetuximab-containing chemotherapies, respectively) and Japanese retrospective (50 refractory patients receiving regorafenib) cohorts. A dataset of specimens submitted to a commercial CLIA-certified laboratory was utilized to characterize molecular profiles of CDC37-high (top quartile, N = 5055) and CDC37-low (bottom quartile, N = 5055) CRCs. RESULTS In the bevacizumab-treated group, CDC37-high patients showed significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) (median 13.3 vs 9.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.79, p < 0.01) than CDC37-low patients. In the cetuximab-treated group, CDC37-high and CDC37-low patients had similar outcomes. In the regorafenib-treated group, CDC37-high patients showed significantly better overall survival (median 11.3 vs 6.0 months, HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.54, p < 0.01) and PFS (median 3.5 vs 1.9 months, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.94, p = 0.03). Comprehensive molecular profiling revealed that CDC37-high CRCs were associated with higher VEGFA, FLT1, and KDR expressions and activated hypoxia signature. CONCLUSIONS CDC37-high mCRC patients derived more benefit from anti-VEGF therapies, including bevacizumab and regorafenib, but not from cetuximab. Molecular profiles suggested that such tumors were dependent on angiogenesis-relating pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Arai
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yan Yang
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yasmine Baca
- Clinical & Translational Research, Medical Affairs, Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Joshua Millstein
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tadamichi Denda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Federico Innocenti
- UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Takeda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yohei Kubota
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Ayako Doi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Horie
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Kumiko Umemoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Naoki Izawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Jingyuan Wang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesca Battaglin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Priya Jayachandran
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sandra Algaze
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shivani Soni
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Wu Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Michael J Hall
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aaron James Scott
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jimmy J Hwang
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, GI Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Emil Lou
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Benjamin A Weinberg
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - John Marshall
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sanjay Goel
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Joanne Xiu
- Clinical & Translational Research, Medical Affairs, Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - W Michael Korn
- Clinical & Translational Research, Medical Affairs, Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yu Sunakawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Battaglin F, Ou FS, Qu X, Hochster HS, Niedzwiecki D, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Ashouri K, Zemla TJ, Blanke CD, Venook AP, Kabbarah O, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F. HER2 Gene Expression Levels Are Predictive and Prognostic in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301507. [PMID: 38457761 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The phase III Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial found no difference in overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy in combination with either bevacizumab or cetuximab. We investigated the potential prognostic and predictive value of HER2 amplification and gene expression using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and NanoString data. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary tumor DNA from 559 patients was profiled for HER2 amplification by NGS (FoundationOne CDx). Tumor tissue from 925 patients was tested for NanoString gene expression using an 800-gene panel. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were the time-to-event end points. RESULTS High HER2 expression (dichotomized at median) was associated with longer PFS (11.6 v 10 months, P = .012) and OS (32 v 25.3 months, P = .033), independent of treatment. An OS benefit for cetuximab versus bevacizumab was observed in the high HER2 expression group (P = .02), whereas a worse PFS for cetuximab was seen in the low-expression group (P = .019). When modeled as a continuous variable, increased HER2 expression was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93]; adjusted P = .0007) and PFS (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74 to 0.91]; adjusted P = .0002), reaching a plateau effect after the median. In patients with HER2 expression lower than median, treatment with cetuximab was associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.71]; adjusted P = .0027) and OS (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.59]; adjusted P = .03) compared with that with bevacizumab. A significant interaction between HER2 expression and the treatment arm was observed for OS (Pintx = .017), PFS (Pintx = .048), and objective response rate (Pintx = .001). CONCLUSION HER2 gene expression was prognostic and predictive in CALGB/SWOG 80405. HER2 tumor expression may inform treatment selection for patients with low HER2 favoring bevacizumab- versus cetuximab-based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Battaglin
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Karam Ashouri
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Tyler J Zemla
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Alan P Venook
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Innocenti F, Mu W, Qu X, Ou FS, Kabbarah O, Blanke CD, Venook AP, Lenz HJ, Rashid NU. DNA Mutational Profiling in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Treated With Standard of Care Reveals Differences in Outcome and Racial Distribution of Mutations. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:399-409. [PMID: 37992266 PMCID: PMC10824387 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405 was a randomized phase III trial that in first-line patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab or cetuximab with chemotherapy. We aimed to discover novel mutated genes associated with prognosis and differential response to therapy with the biologics. METHODS Primary tumor DNA from 548 patients was sequenced using FoundationOne. The effect of mutated genes and mutations on overall survival (OS) was tested adjusting for microsatellite instability status, BRAF V600E, all RAS mutations, arm, sex, and age. RESULTS The median number (lower-upper quartile) of mutated genes was 5 (3-7), 5 (3-6) in microsatellite stable and 12.5 (4.5-32) in microsatellite instability-high tumors. Mutated KRAS and APC were more frequent in Black (53% and 85%) than White (27% and 65%, respectively) patients while BRAF V600E was less frequent in Black (5%) than White (14%) patients. The median OS in patients with BRAF non-V600E (2.2% of patients) was 31.9 months (95% CI, 15.1 to not applicable [NA]) similar to that of BRAF wild-type (WT) patients (31.2 months [95% CI, 29.0 to 33.9]). Mutated LRP1B (10.7% of patients) was associated with improved OS compared with WT LRP1B (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.80]). RNF43 (5.6% of patients) interacted with treatment arms as, in the cetuximab arm, patients with mutated RNF43 had a median OS of 11.5 (95% CI, 10.8 to NA) months compared with 30.1 (95% CI, 24.9 to 35.3) months in patients with WT RNF43, whereas in the bevacizumab arm, patients with mutated RNF43 had a median OS of 25.0 (95% CI, 14.2 to NA) months compared with 31.3 (95% CI, 29.0 to 34.3) months in patients with WT RNF43. CONCLUSION These results can provide new tools to predict patient outcome and improve therapeutic decisions and trial participation in patient minorities. The molecular alterations identified in this study may direct biomarker-driven studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Innocenti
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Wancen Mu
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Xueping Qu
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Naim U. Rashid
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Battaglin F, Baca Y, Millstein J, Yang Y, Xiu J, Arai H, Wang J, Ou FS, Innocenti F, Mumenthaler SM, Jayachandran P, Kawanishi N, Lenz A, Soni S, Algaze S, Zhang W, Khoukaz T, Roussos Torres E, Seeber A, Abraham JP, Lou E, Philip PA, Weinberg BA, Shields AF, Goldberg RM, Marshall JL, Venook AP, Korn WM, Lenz HJ. CCR5 and CCL5 gene expression in colorectal cancer: comprehensive profiling and clinical value. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e007939. [PMID: 38212126 PMCID: PMC10806545 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The C-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5)/C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) axis plays a major role in colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to characterize the molecular features associated with CCR5/CCL5 expression in CRC and to determine whether CCR5/CCL5 levels could impact treatment outcomes. METHODS 7604 CRCs tested with NextGen Sequencing on DNA and RNA were analyzed. Molecular features were evaluated according to CCR5 and CCL5 tumor gene expression quartiles. The impact on treatment outcomes was assessed in two cohorts, including 6341 real-world patients and 429 patients from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial. RESULTS CCR5/CCL5 expression was higher in right-sided versus left-sided tumors, and positively associated with consensus molecular subtypes 1 and 4. Higher CCR5/CCL5 expression was associated with higher tumor mutational burden, deficiency in mismatch repair and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels. Additionally, high CCR5/CCL5 were associated with higher immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of MMR proficient tumors. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed upregulation of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy pathway, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) signaling, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) signaling in cytotoxic T lymphocytes, whereas several inflammation-related pathways were downregulated. Low CCR5/CCL5 expression was associated with increased benefit from cetuximab-FOLFOX treatment in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial, where significant treatment interaction was observed with biologic agents and chemotherapy backbone. CONCLUSIONS Our data show a strong association between CCR5/CCL5 gene expression and distinct molecular features, gene expression profiles, TME cell infiltration, and treatment benefit in CRC. Targeting the CCR5/CCL5 axis may have clinical applications in selected CRC subgroups and may play a key role in developing and deploying strategies to modulate the immune TME for CRC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Battaglin
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Joshua Millstein
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yan Yang
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joanne Xiu
- Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Arai
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jingyuan Wang
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Federico Innocenti
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shannon M Mumenthaler
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Lawrence J Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Priya Jayachandran
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Natsuko Kawanishi
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Annika Lenz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shivani Soni
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sandra Algaze
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Wu Zhang
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Taline Khoukaz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Evanthia Roussos Torres
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andreas Seeber
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
| | | | - Emil Lou
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Philip A Philip
- Department of Oncology and Pharmacology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Benjamin A Weinberg
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Anthony F Shields
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - John L Marshall
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ou FS, Ahn DH, Dixon JG, Grothey A, Lou Y, Kasi PM, Hubbard JM, Van Cutsem E, Saltz LB, Schmoll HJ, Goldberg RM, Venook AP, Hoff P, Douillard JY, Hecht JR, Hurwitz H, Punt CJA, Koopman M, Bokemeyer C, Fuchs CS, Diaz-Rubio E, Tebbutt NC, Cremolini C, Kabbinavar FF, Bekaii-Saab T, Chibaudel B, Yoshino T, Zalcberg J, Adams RA, de Gramont A, Shi Q. Evaluation of Intratumoral Response Heterogeneity in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Its Impact on Patient Overall Survival: Findings from 10,551 Patients in the ARCAD Database. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4117. [PMID: 37627145 PMCID: PMC10452983 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a heterogeneous disease that can evoke discordant responses to therapy among different lesions in individual patients. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria do not take into consideration response heterogeneity. We explored and developed lesion-based measurement response criteria to evaluate their prognostic effect on overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients enrolled in 17 first-line clinical trials, who had mCRC with ≥ 2 lesions at baseline, and a restaging scan by 12 weeks were included. For each patient, lesions were categorized as a progressing lesion (PL: > 20% increase in the longest diameter (LD)), responding lesion (RL: > 30% decrease in LD), or stable lesion (SL: neither PL nor RL) based on the 12-week scan. Lesion-based response criteria were defined for each patient as follows: PL only, SL only, RL only, and varied responses (mixture of RL, SL, and PL). Lesion-based response criteria and OS were correlated using stratified multivariable Cox models. The concordance between OS and classifications was measured using the C statistic. RESULTS Among 10,551 patients with mCRC from 17 first-line studies, varied responses were noted in 51.6% of patients, among whom, 3.3% had RL/PL at 12 weeks. Among patients with RL/SL, 52% had stable disease (SD) by RECIST 1.1, and they had a longer OS (median OS (mOS) = 19.9 months) than those with SL only (mOS = 16.8 months, HR (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.76, 0.85), p < 0.001), although a shorter OS than those with RL only (mOS = 25.8 months, HR (95% CI) = 1.42 (1.32, 1.53), p < 0.001). Among patients with SL/PL, 74% had SD by RECIST 1.1, and they had a longer OS (mOS = 9.0 months) than those with PL only (mOS = 8.0 months, HR (95% CI) = 0.75 (0.57, 0.98), p = 0.040), yet a shorter OS than those with SL only (mOS = 16.8 months, HR (95% CI) = 1.98 (1.80, 2.18), p < 0.001). These associations were consistent across treatment regimen subgroups. The lesion-based response criteria showed slightly higher concordance than RECIST 1.1, although it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Varied responses at first restaging are common among patients receiving first-line therapy for mCRC. Our lesion-based measurement criteria allowed for better mortality discrimination, which could potentially be informative for treatment decision-making and influence patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Shu Ou
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Daniel H Ahn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Jesse G Dixon
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Axel Grothey
- West Cancer Center, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN 38104, USA
| | - Yiyue Lou
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Pashtoon M Kasi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | | | - Eric Van Cutsem
- Department of Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leonard B Saltz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Hans-Joachim Schmoll
- Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic for Internal Medicine IV, Martin-Luther-University Halle/Saale, 06120 Halle, Germany
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, The University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Paulo Hoff
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-010, Brazil
| | - Jean-Yves Douillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Nantes Medical School, 44035 Nantes, France
| | | | - Herbert Hurwitz
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Julius Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Eduardo Diaz-Rubio
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Niall C Tebbutt
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Benoist Chibaudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Institute, 92300 Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| | - John Zalcberg
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Richard A Adams
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK
- Velindre Cancer Center, Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK
| | - Aimery de Gramont
- Department of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Institute, 92300 Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Qian Shi
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ou FS, Walden DJ, Larson JJ, Kang S, Griswold CR, Ueberroth BE, Patel B, Draper A, Raman P, Alese OB, Sonbol MB, Bekaii-Saab TS, Wu CS, Ahn DH. Changes in Prescribing Patterns in Stage III Colon Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:841-850.e4. [PMID: 37549913 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with resected stage III colon cancer, 6 months of adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care. The IDEA collaboration aimed to evaluate whether 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy was noninferior to 6 months. Despite failing to meet its primary endpoint, the subgroup analyses demonstrated noninferiority based on regimen and treatment duration when a risk-stratified approach was used. PATIENTS AND METHODS To evaluate the impact of the results of the IDEA collaboration, we evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy prescribing practice patterns, including planned adjuvant treatment regimen and duration from January 1, 2016, to January 31, 2021. The time period was selected to evaluate chemotherapy prescribing patterns prior to the abstract presentation of the IDEA collaboration in June 2017 and after full manuscript publication in March 2018. RESULTS A total of 399 patients with stage III colon cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the analysis. A significant increasing trend for use of 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy was observed after presentation of the IDEA abstract (P<.001). A significant change in CAPOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) prescribing was also observed, increasing from 14% of patients prior to presentation of the IDEA abstract to 48% after presentation (P<.001). Comparing 3 months of CAPOX with 6 months of FOLFOX (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin), 3 months of CAPOX use also steadily increased over time (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.20-1.37; P<.001). Among subgroups of interest, no differences in adoption of CAPOX were observed. The adoption of 3 months of CAPOX was similar in patients with low-risk cancer (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.37) and those with high-risk cancer (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.16-1.47). CONCLUSIONS Despite the IDEA collaboration failing to demonstrate noninferiority of 3 months' duration of adjuvant therapy compared with 6 months, the findings have influenced practice prescribing patterns, favoring CAPOX and a shorter duration of planned adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Shu Ou
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Joseph J Larson
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sandra Kang
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Bhamini Patel
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Amber Draper
- Emory University Hospital Midtown, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Puneet Raman
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Olatunji B Alese
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Christina S Wu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Daniel H Ahn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tran NH, Larson JJ, Ou FS, Mahipal A, McCue SA, Graham RP, Fernandez-Zapico ME, Revzin A, Fonkoua LAK, Flickinger LM, Cleary SP, Bekaii-Saab TS, Borad MJ, McWilliams RR, Jatoi A, Ma WW. CLO23-030: MC200402-Single-Arm Phase 2 Study of the FGFR Inhibitor Futibatinib (Futi) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Pem) in Patients With FGF19 Expressing Advanced or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma (aHCC). J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
8
|
Ciombor KK, Zemla TJ, Hubbard JM, Jia J, Gbolahan OB, Sousa A, Wilson L, Waechter B, Ou FS, Nixon AB, Bekaii-Saab TS. A phase II single-arm study of the FGFR inhibitor pemigatinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring FGF/FGFR alterations. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
139 Background: The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway plays a key role in cellular proliferation, migration, survival and angiogenesis. Aberrant signaling through FGFR in colorectal cancer and other malignancies results from gene amplification or mutation, chromosomal translocation or ligand-dependent activation of the receptors. Pemigatinib is an oral inhibitor of FGFR1-3 with proven efficacy in FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinoma and myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms, among others. We hypothesized that pemigatinib would improve response rates compared to historical controls in patients with refractory FGF/FGFR-altered mCRC. Methods: ACCRU-GI-1701 was a multicenter, single-arm, Simon’s two-stage phase II clinical trial (NCT04096417) of the FGFR inhibitor pemigatinib in patients (pts) with FGF/FGFR-altered mCRC. Eligible pts had received prior fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and anti-VEGF/anti-EGFR/anti-PD-1 if eligible. Pts received pemigatinib 13.5 mg once daily on d1-21 of each cycle, with option to escalate to 18 mg in c2 if well tolerated. The primary endpoint was (unconfirmed) objective response (OR). A sample size of 21 evaluable pts would provide 82% power to detect a true OR rate of 20% or greater compared to a historical control of 5 % with a one-sided type I error rate of 0.1. A prespecified interim analysis for futility was planned after 12 evaluable patients. Results: A total of 14 patients were enrolled in the first stage of the study, and all were evaluable for the primary endpoint. No OR were observed (out of 12) crossing the futility boundary and resulting in permanent closure of the study. Among all enrolled patients, median age was 60.5 years, 71.4% were male, 92.9% Caucasian, 42.9% with no prior exposure to TAS-102 or regorafenib, and 64.3% with left-sided primary tumors. Treated patients all had tumors with FGFR1-4 mutations and/or FGF/FGFR amplifications by tissue- and/or blood-based molecular testing; no FGFR translocations were present. OR rate for this study was 0% (95% CI, 0-23.2%), with one patient achieving stable disease as best response. Median progression-free survival was 9.1 weeks (95% CI, 7.9-not evaluable [NE]), and median overall survival was 7.9 months (95% CI, 3.4-NE). Grade 3+ adverse events (AE) were seen in 42.9% of treated patients (including 1 grade 5 AE). Most commonly occurring AEs of any grade were anemia, hyperphosphatemia, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increase, and fatigue. Conclusions: Pemigatinib demonstrated evidence of safety but not clinical activity in this population of patients with FGF/FGFR-altered mCRC. It is unknown whether pemigatinib would be active in mCRC patients with FGFR translocations/fusions as these were not represented in our trial. Translational studies are planned to investigate mechanisms of resistance to this therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04096417 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tyler J. Zemla
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Raghav K, Ou FS, Venook AP, Innocenti F, Sun R, Lenz HJ, Kopetz S. Acquired Genomic Alterations on First-Line Chemotherapy With Cetuximab in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis of the CALGB/SWOG-80405 Trial (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:472-478. [PMID: 36067452 PMCID: PMC9870237 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Acquired genomic alterations (Acq-GAs), specifically RAS, BRAF, and EGFR-ectodomain mutations and ERBB2 and MET amplifications, are recognized as major mechanisms of resistance to later-line anti-EGFR-antibody therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, data regarding emergence of these Acq-GAs under the selective pressure of first-line anti-EGFR-chemotherapy are lacking. We performed next-generation sequencing (Guardant360) on circulating tumor DNA obtained from paired plasma samples (pretreatment and postprogression) from the CALGB/SWOG-80405 trial, which randomly assigned patients with mCRC between first-line chemotherapy with cetuximab (anti-EGFR-chemotherapy) or bevacizumab (anti-VEGF-chemotherapy). The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of Acq-GAs on anti-EGFR-chemotherapy and compare this to the prevalence with anti-VEGF-chemotherapy on trial and pooled estimates (N = 292) seen with later-line anti-EGFR-antibody therapy as reported in the literature. Among the 61 patients on anti-EGFR-chemotherapy, only four (6.6%) developed ≥ 1 Acq-GAs of interest compared with 10.1% (7) on anti-VEGF-chemotherapy (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.20 to 2.11) and 62.0% on anti-EGFR-antibody therapy in later lines (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.23). Acq-GAs, classically associated with anti-EGFR-antibody resistance in later lines (RAS, BRAF, and EGFR-ectodomain mutations; ERBB2 and MET amplifications), were rare with up-front use of anti-EGFR-chemotherapy indicating divergent resistance mechanisms. These findings have critical translational relevance to timing and value of circulating tumor DNA-guided anti-EGFR rechallenge in patients with mCRC, especially those treated with anti-EGFR therapy upfront.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanwal Raghav
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Alan P. Venook
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Ryan Sun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Scott Kopetz
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Van Blarigan EL, Ma C, Ou FS, Bainter TM, Venook AP, Ng K, Niedzwiecki D, Giovannucci E, Lenz HJ, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O’Reilly EM, Ciombor KK, Meyerhardt JA. Dietary fat in relation to all-cause mortality and cancer progression and death among people with metastatic colorectal cancer: Data from CALGB 80405 (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:123-136. [PMID: 35904874 PMCID: PMC9691576 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Data on diet and survival among people with metastatic colorectal cancer are limited. We examined dietary fat in relation to all-cause mortality and cancer progression or death among 1149 people in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 80405 trial who completed a food frequency questionnaire at initiation of treatment for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. We examined saturated, monounsaturated, total and specific types (n-3, long-chain n-3 and n-6) of polyunsaturated fat, animal and vegetable fats. We hypothesized higher vegetable fat intake would be associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and cancer progression. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Over median follow-up of 6.1 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.3, 7.2 y), we observed 974 deaths and 1077 events of progression or death. Participants had a median age of 59 y; 41% were female and 86% identified as White. Moderate or higher vegetable fat was associated with lower risk of mortality and cancer progression or death (HRs comparing second, third and fourth to first quartile for all-cause mortality: 0.74 [0.62, 0.90]; 0.75 [0.61, 0.91]; 0.79 [0.63, 1.00]; P trend: .12; for cancer progression or death: 0.74 [0.62, 0.89]; 0.78 [0.64, 0.95]; 0.71 [0.57, 0.88]; P trend: .01). No other fat type was associated with all-cause mortality and cancer progression or death. Moderate or higher vegetable fat intake may be associated with lower risk of cancer progression or death among people with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tiffany M. Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Blase N. Polite
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair’s Office, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Johnson RM, Qu X, Lin CF, Huw LY, Venkatanarayan A, Sokol E, Ou FS, Ihuegbu N, Zill OA, Kabbarah O, Wang L, Bourgon R, de Sousa E Melo F, Bolen C, Daemen A, Venook AP, Innocenti F, Lenz HJ, Bais C. ARID1A mutations confer intrinsic and acquired resistance to cetuximab treatment in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun 2022; 13:5478. [PMID: 36117191 PMCID: PMC9482920 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33172-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Most colorectal (CRC) tumors are dependent on EGFR/KRAS/BRAF/MAPK signaling activation. ARID1A is an epigenetic regulator mutated in approximately 5% of non-hypermutated CRC tumors. Here we show that anti-EGFR but not anti-VEGF treatment enriches for emerging ARID1A mutations in CRC patients. In addition, we find that patients with ARID1A mutations, at baseline, are associated with worse outcome when treated with cetuximab- but not bevacizumab-containing therapies; thus, this suggests that ARID1A mutations may provide both an acquired and intrinsic mechanism of resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. We find that, ARID1A and EGFR-pathway genetic alterations are mutually exclusive across lung and colorectal cancers, further supporting a functional connection between these pathways. Our results not only suggest that ARID1A could be potentially used as a predictive biomarker for cetuximab treatment decisions but also provide a rationale for exploring therapeutic MAPK inhibition in an unexpected but genetically defined segment of CRC patients. ARID1A is an epigenetic regulator mutated in approximately 5% of non-hypermutated colorectal cancer tumors, however, its relationship with treatment response remains to be explored. Here, the authors suggest that ARID1A mutations may confer intrinsic and acquired resistance to cetuximab treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radia M Johnson
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Xueping Qu
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Chu-Fang Lin
- Real World Data Science Analytics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ling-Yuh Huw
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Ethan Sokol
- Cancer Genomics Research, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Oliver A Zill
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Omar Kabbarah
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Wang
- Real World Data Science Analytics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Richard Bourgon
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Chris Bolen
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anneleen Daemen
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Carlos Bais
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Le-Rademacher JG, Therneau TM, Ou FS. The Utility of Multistate Models: A Flexible Framework for Time-to-Event Data. CURR EPIDEMIOL REP 2022; 9:183-189. [PMID: 36003089 PMCID: PMC9392702 DOI: 10.1007/s40471-022-00291-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Survival analyses are common and essential in medical research. Most readers are familiar with Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox models; however, very few are familiar with multistate models. Although multistate models were introduced in 1965, they only recently receive more attention in the medical research community. The current review introduces common terminologies and quantities that can be estimated from multistate models. Examples from published literature are used to illustrate the utility of multistate models. Recent Findings A figure of states and transitions is a useful depiction of a multistate model. Clinically meaningful quantities that can be estimated from a multistate model include the probability in a state at a given time, the average time in a state, and the expected number of visits to a state; all of which describe the absolute risks of an event. Relative risk can also be estimated using multistate hazard models. Summary Multistate models provide a more general and flexible framework that extends beyond the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox models. Multistate models allow simultaneous analyses of multiple disease pathways to provide insights into the natural history of complex diseases. We strongly encourage the use of multistate models when analyzing time-to-event data. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40471-022-00291-y.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee S, Ma C, Zhang S, Ou FS, Bainter TM, Niedzwiecki D, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Whittom R, Hantel A, Benson A, Atienza D, Kindler H, Gross CP, Irwin ML, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS. Marital Status, Living Arrangement, and Cancer Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer: Findings from CALGB 89803 (Alliance). Oncologist 2022; 27:e494-e505. [PMID: 35641198 PMCID: PMC9177101 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited and conflicting findings have been reported regarding the association between social support and colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes. We sought to assess the influences of marital status and living arrangement on survival outcomes among patients with stage III colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of 1082 patients with stage III colon cancer prospectively followed in the CALGB 89803 randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial. Marital status and living arrangement were both self-reported at the time of enrollment as, respectively, married, divorced, separated, widowed, or never-married, and living alone, with a spouse or partner, with other family, in a nursing home, or other. RESULTS Over a median follow-up of 7.6 years, divorced/separated/widowed patients experienced worse outcomes relative to those married regarding disease free-survival (DFS) (hazards ratio (HR), 1.44 (95% CI, 1.14-1.81); P =.002), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.05-1.73); P = .02), and overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.08-1.82); P =.01); outcomes were not significantly different for never-married patients. Compared to patients living with a spouse/partner, those living with other family experienced a DFS of 1.47 (95% CI, 1.02-2.11; P = .04), RFS of 1.34 (95% CI, 0.91-1.98; P = .14), and OS of 1.50 (95% CI, 1.00-2.25; P =.05); patients living alone did not experience significantly different outcomes. CONCLUSION Among patients with stage III colon cancer who received uniform treatment and follow-up within a nationwide randomized clinical trial, being divorced/separated/widowed and living with other family were significantly associated with greater colon cancer mortality. Interventions enhancing social support services may be clinically relevant for this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003835.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chao Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tiffany M Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Alexander Hantel
- Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - Al Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Hedy Kindler
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cary P Gross
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arai H, Yang Y, Millstein J, Denda T, Ou FS, Innocenti F, Takeda H, Doi A, Horie Y, Umemoto K, Izawa N, Wang J, Battaglin F, Kawanishi N, Jayachandran P, Soni S, Wu Z, Venook AP, Sunakawa Y, Lenz HJ. Predictive value of CDC37 gene expression for targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.3586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3586 Background: HSP90 mediated chaperoning is a well-conserved biological mechanism for stabilization and activation of kinases. More than 60% of human kinases including VEGFR, CRAF, CSF1R, and FGFR are target of HSP90 (client kinases), whereas EGFR is non-client. CDC37 is a specific co-chaperone determining selectivity of client kinases recognized by HSP90. We hypothesized that gene expression levels of CDC37 have predictive values for anti-angiogenic therapies in mCRC. Methods: The subjects of this study were mCRC patients treated with regorafenib (REGO, Japanese retrospective cohort) and those treated with bevacizumab (BEV) or cetuximab (CET) in combination with first-line chemotherapy (CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial cohort). CDC37 expression levels were measured using RNA isolated from FFPE samples by nCounter gene expression profiling (Nanostring) and HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) in the Japanese and CALGB/SWOG 80405 cohorts, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between patients with high CDC37 expression ( CDC37-H) and those with low expression ( CDC37-L), grouped by median cutoff value in each cohort. Results: In total, 484 patients were included (50 treated with REGO, 227 treated with BEV, and 207 treated with CET). In REGO-treated patients, CDC37-H showed significantly better OS (median 11.3 vs 6.0 months, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.54, p <0.01) and PFS (median 3.5 vs 1.9 months, adjusted HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.94, p = 0.03) compared to CDC37-L. Similarly, in BEV-treated patients, CDC37-H showed significantly better PFS (median 13.5 vs 9.6 months, adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.79, p <0.01) and numerically better OS (median 34.1 vs 29.4 months, adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-1.11, p = 0.20) compared to CDC37-L. However, in CET-treated patients, CDC37-H and CDC37-L patients showed similar OS (median 33.7 vs 26.1 months, adjusted HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.38, p = 0.98) and PFS (median 11.3 vs 11.0 months, adjusted HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81-1.45, p = 0.60). Significant interaction was observed between CDC37 expression and treatment in terms of PFS in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 cohort ( p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our results suggest patients with CDC37-dependent ( CDC37-H) tumors may derive more benefit from REGO and BEV both of which target HSP90 client kinases or signaling pathways, but not from CET which target HSP90 non-client kinase. Further validation studies are warranted to develop a novel personalized approach for targeted therapies based on CDC37 expression in mCRC patients. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180888; Pfizer, Genentech; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00265850.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Arai
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Yan Yang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joshua Millstein
- Department of Preventive Medicine, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Tadamichi Denda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Hiroyuki Takeda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Ayako Doi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Horie
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Kumiko Umemoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Naoki Izawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Jingyuan Wang
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Francesca Battaglin
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Natsuko Kawanishi
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Shivani Soni
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Zhang Wu
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Yu Sunakawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ma WW, Ou FS, Li JJ, Tran NH, Babiker HM, Revzin A, Dong H, Nelson GD, Ness A, Schuster CE, Jia J, Bekaii-Saab TS. ACCRU-GI-2008: A phase II randomized study of atezolizumab (Atezo) plus a multi-kinase inhibitor (MKI) versus MKI alone in patients with unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who previously received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Bev). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps4170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS4170 Background: IMbrave150 is the first study demonstrating the benefit of anti-PDL1 in the frontline treatment of aHCC, and established Atezo/Bev as a new 1st line standard for aHCC. There is currently limited evidence to guide subsequent therapy for aHCC patients progressing on Atezo/Bev. ACCRU-GI-2008 is designed to determine the benefit of continuing Atezo into 2nd line and the safety of Atezo plus a MKI in patients with aHCC who previously received Atezo/Bev. The study is being conducted across 12 centers in the United States (ClincalTrials.gov#: NCT05168163). Methods: This study utilizes a 2:1 randomized phase II design where eligible patients will receive either Atezo/MKI (experimental arm) or MKI alone (control). Patients will be stratified according to the MKI choice (cabozantinib or lenvatinib, per physician’s decision), etiology of HCC (viral vs. non-viral) and alpha-fetoprotein level ( < 400 vs. > = 400 ng/mL). The major eligibility criteria are histological/cytological diagnosis or clinical diagnosis of HCC per the AASLD or WASL 2018 guidelines, has advanced disease not amendable to curative treatment, previously received and progressed on Atezo/Bev, has received only 1 previous line of systemic therapy (2nd line only), ECOG PS 0-1, Child Pugh Class A, adequate organ reserves and RECIST v1.1 measurable disease; previous MKI for advanced disease is excluded. The primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). A total sample size of 122, with 89 PFS events, we will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median PFS from 4 to 7 months, assuming a one-sided significance level of 0.05. With approximately 84 deaths, we will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 10 to 18 months, assuming a one-sided significance level of 0.05. The overall one-sided significance level, for the study, is 0.1. An OS interim analysis will be conducted at 89 PFS events. Secondary endpoints include objective response, duration of response, and adverse events. Archival tumor and serial blood samples will be collected to evaluate for potential prediction biomarkers and mechanisms of sensitivity/resistance. Baseline and on-treatment tumor biopsy specimens will also be collected from the initial 10 patients of each arm. The study is approved by the ethics committee and enrollment to the study will be underway by Q2/3 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05168163.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Wee Ma
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jenny Jing Li
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang W, Millstein J, Yang Y, Ou FS, Innocenti F, Arai H, Soni S, Mumenthaler SM, Algaze S, Jayachandran P, Bertagnolli MM, Deming DA, Niedzwiecki D, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, Venook AP, Kabbarah O, Battaglin F, Lenz HJ. Predictive value of MAOB gene expression for targeted therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) enrolled in CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.3580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3580 Background: Monoamine oxidases (MAOs), including MAOA and MAOB, are mitochondrial enzymes responsible for catalyzing monoamine oxidation. Increased expression of MAOs were found in several cancer types and high MAOB was associated with worse disease stage and poorer survival in CRC. Positive and negative correlations of MAOB expression with mesenchymal type and epithelial type gene expressions, respectively, have been reported. Hence, we investigated whether MAOB expression is predictive for targeted therapies in mCRC. Methods: 430 mCRC pts treated with either bevacizumab (BEV, n = 224) or cetuximab (CET, n = 206) in combination with first-line chemotherapy within the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were included in the analysis. MAOB RNA was isolated from FFPE tumor samples and sequenced on the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between groups of pts categorized by tertiles of MAOB expression into high (H), medium (M) and low (L). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed from multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, sex, location, number of metastases, KRAS, MSI status, and treatment with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI. Sensitivity analyses were conducted after stratifying by sex. Logrank P-values describe differences without adjustment for patient characteristics. Results: In CET-treated pts, MAOB-L showed significantly longer OS (median 39.2 vs 30.9 vs 15.9 months, logrank P = 4.7E-05, L vs H (as reference) adjusted HR 0.42, 95% CI [0.27, 0.65]) and PFS (median 13.2 vs 11.8 vs 7.6 months, logrank P = 0.006, L vs H adjusted HR 0.59 [0.40, 0.88]) compared to MAOB-M and MAOB-H, respectively. Similar results were observed when evaluating MAOB expression as a continuous variable. In BEV-treated pts, no significant differences were observed when comparing MAOB expression tertiles; however, pts with lower MAOB expression had significantly better OS, but not PFS, when evaluating MAOB as a continuous variable (Cox LRT P = 0.015, covariate adjusted). In CET-treated pts, the effect of MAOB expression was observed in male but not female pts (OS: median 40.3 vs 30.9 vs 16.1 months by MAOB-L, M, H, respectively, logrank P = 6.8E-05, L vs H adjusted HR 0.33 [0.19, 0.59]; PFS: median 13.8 vs 12.6 vs 7.9 months, logrank P = 0.001, L vs H adjusted HR 0.46 [0.28, 0.79]). A significant interaction was observed between MAOB expression and treatment for OS ( P = 0.010) in males and females combined, but only in males ( P = 0.018) when stratified by sex. Conclusions: Our results suggest that pts with MAOB-L tumors may have greater benefit from CET-based treatment and that targeting MAOB may be a promising strategy to improve patient outcomes. Further validation studies are warranted to develop a novel personalized approach based on MAOB expression in mCRC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00265850.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joshua Millstein
- Department of Preventive Medicine, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Yan Yang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Hiroyuki Arai
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Shivani Soni
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Shannon M. Mumenthaler
- Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sandra Algaze
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Priya Jayachandran
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Dustin A. Deming
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, and ECOG-ACRIN, Madison, WI
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformations, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Robert J. Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | - Charles David Blanke
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, andSWOG Group Chair’s Office, Portland, OR
| | | | | | - Francesca Battaglin
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kohn CG, Ou FS, Ma C, Larson NB, Zemla TJ, Yuan C, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis BW, Nixon AB, Lenz HJ, Blanke CD, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Venook AP, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K. Gene expression of vitamin D (VitD) pathway markers and survival in patients (Pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.3553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3553 Background: Higher levels of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D)] are associated with better outcomes in mCRC, but underlying biologic mechanisms are unknown. Key components of the VitD metabolic pathway include CYP27B1 (encodes 1-α-hydroxylase, converts 25(OH)D to active calcitriol), VitD receptor (VDR), and CYP24A1 (encodes 24-hydroxylase, degrades calcitriol and 25(OH)D into excreted metabolites). Since these factors may affect 25(OH)D levels and potentially mediate VitD activity in mCRC, we examined the relationship between tumoral gene expression (GEx) of CYP27B1, VDR, and CYP24A and pt outcome in a study nested in a randomized phase III trial of first-line chemotherapy plus biologics in mCRC pts, CALGB/SWOG 80405. Methods: We determined GEx of CYP27B1, VDR, and CYP24A1 by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) of archival tumor samples using the Illumina TruSeq platform. Primary endpoints were overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for prognostic and molecular characteristics. Results: 562 pts with RNA-Seq data were included. Pts with higher CYP27B1 expression (>median) were less likely to have BRAF wild type (WT) (79% vs 90%) compared to pts with lower expression (p=0.0007). Pts with higher VDR expression (>quartile 1 [Q1]) were younger (median age 59 vs 62 years; p=0.03), more likely to have left-sided (63% vs 46%; p=0.0005) and BRAF WT tumors (89% vs 70%; p<0.0001), and less likely to have RAS WT tumors (70% vs 80%; p=0.02) compared to pts with lower VDR. Pts with higher CYP24A1 expression (>median) were more likely to have left-sided tumors compared to pts with lower expression (63% vs 54%; p=0.03). On multivariable analysis, pts with higher CYP27B1 expression had significantly improved OS (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.93; p=0.002) and PFS (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; p=0.04). Higher VDR expression (up to Q1) was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.91; p=0.007) but not OS (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.09; p=0.20). Above Q1, this improvement attenuated. Higher CYP24A1 GEx was not associated with improved OS (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88-1.08; p=0.66) or PFS (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89-1.08; p=0.68). We found no significant interactions between GEx of CYP27B1, VDR, or CYP24A with baseline plasma 25(OH)D levels (p for interaction ≥0.10 for all). Conclusions: Our findings suggest an association between GEx of VitD pathway markers, particularly CYP27B1 and VDR, and survival in pts with mCRC, lending biologic plausibility to a role of VitD in CRC pathogenesis. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms of action. Clinical trial information: NCT00265850 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Chao Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | - Nicholas B Larson
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tyler J. Zemla
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformations, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Bruce W. Hollis
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Charles David Blanke
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, andSWOG Group Chair’s Office, Portland, OR
| | | | - Robert J. Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kulke MH, Ou FS, Niedzwiecki D, Huebner L, Kunz P, Kennecke HF, Wolin EM, Chan JA, O’Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Venook A. Everolimus with or without bevacizumab in advanced pNET: CALGB 80701 (Alliance). Endocr Relat Cancer 2022; 29:335-344. [PMID: 35324465 PMCID: PMC9257687 DOI: 10.1530/erc-21-0239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Treatment with the MTOR inhibitor everolimus improves progression-free survival (PFS) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), but it is not known if the addition of a VEGF pathway inhibitor to an MTOR inhibitor enhances antitumor activity. We performed a randomized phase II study evaluating everolimus with or without bevacizumab in patients with advanced pNETs. One hundred and fifty patients were randomized to receive everolimus 10 mg daily with or without bevacizumab 10 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks. Patients also received standard dose of octreotide in both arms. The primary endpoint was PFS, based on local investigator review. Treatment with the combination of everolimus and bevacizumab resulted in improved progression-free survival compared to everolimus (16.7 months compared to 14.0 months; one-sided stratified log-rank P = 0.1028; hazard ratio (HR) 0.80 (95% CI 0.56-1.13)), meeting the predefined primary endpoint. Confirmed tumor responses were observed in 31% (95% CI 20%, 41%) of patients receiving combination therapy, as compared to only 12% (95% CI 5%, 19%) of patients receiving treatment with everolimus (P = 0.0053). Median overall survival duration was similar in the everolimus and combination arm (42.5 and 42.1 months, respectively). Treatment-related toxicities were more common in the combination arm. In summary, treatment with everolimus and bevacizumab led to superior PFS and higher response rates compared to everolimus in patients with advanced pNETs. Although the higher rate of treatment-related adverse events may limit the use of this combination, our results support the continued evaluation of VEGF pathway inhibitors in pNETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew H. Kulke
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Boston University and Boston Medical Center, 820 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02118
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, 200 First Street SW Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Center, 200 Duke Medicine Circle Durham, NC 22710
| | - Lucas Huebner
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, 200 First Street SW Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Pamela Kunz
- Yale Cancer Center, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510
| | | | - Edward M. Wolin
- Tisch Cancer Institute. 1470 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029
| | - Jennifer A Chan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Eileen M. O’Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065
| | | | - Alan Venook
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Box 1705 UCSF San Francisco, CA, 94143
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McCleary NJ, Zhang S, Ma C, Ou FS, Bainter TM, Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, O'Neil BH, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Ng K, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O'Reilly EM, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Age and comorbidity association with survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer: CALGB 80405 analysis. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:469-479. [PMID: 35105521 PMCID: PMC9058225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the interaction of comorbidities and age on survival outcomes in colorectal cancer (mCRC), nor how comorbidities impact treatment tolerance. METHODS We utilized a cohort of 1345 mCRC patients enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405, a multicenter phase III trial of fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab, cetuximab or both. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 toxicities assessed using NCI CTCAE v.3.0. Participants completed a questionnaire, including a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index. Adjusted Cox and logistic regression models tested associations of comorbidities and age on the endpoints. RESULTS In CALGB/SWOG 80405, 1095 (81%) subjects were < 70 years and >70 250 (19%). Presence of ≥1 comorbidity was not significantly associated with either OS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96-1.25) or PFS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-1.16). Compared to subjects <70 with no comorbidities, OS was non-significantly inferior for ≥70 with no comorbidities (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.98-1.49) and significantly inferior for ≥70 with at least one comorbidity (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.22-1.86). There were no significant associations or interactions between age or comorbidity with PFS. Comorbidities were not associated with treatment-related toxicities. Age ≥ 70 was associated with greater risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicities (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.50-3.09, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among participants in a clinical trial of combination chemotherapy for mCRC, presence of older age with comorbidities was associated with worse OS but not PFS. The association of age with toxicity suggests additional factors of care should be measured in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Sui Zhang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Tiffany M Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | | | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Federico Innocenti
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Blase N Polite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Howard S Hochster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, CCOP, Goldsboro, NC, United States of America
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV, United States of America
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smillow Cancer Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Innocenti F, Yazdani A, Rashid N, Qu X, Ou FS, Van Buren S, Bertagnolli M, Kabbarah O, Blanke CD, Venook AP, Lenz HJ, Vincent BG. Tumor Immunogenomic Features Determine Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Standard-of-Care Combinations of Bevacizumab and Cetuximab. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1690-1700. [PMID: 35176136 PMCID: PMC9093780 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE CALGB/SWOG 80405 was a randomized phase III trial in first-line patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab, cetuximab, or both, plus chemotherapy. We tested the effect of tumor immune features on overall survival (OS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Primary tumors (N = 554) were profiled by RNA sequencing. Immune signatures of macrophages, lymphocytes, TGFβ, IFNγ, wound healing, and cytotoxicity were measured. CIBERSORTx scores of naive and memory B cells, plasma cells, CD8+ T cells, resting and activated memory CD4+ T cells, M0 and M2 macrophages, and activated mast cells were measured. RESULTS Increased M2 macrophage score [HR, 6.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0-12.15] and TGFβ signature expression (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.77) were associated with shorter OS. Increased scores of plasma cells (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.87) and activated memory CD4+ T cells (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16-0.65) were associated with longer OS. Using optimal cutoffs from these four features, patients were categorized as having either 4, 3, 2, or 0-1 beneficial features associated with longer OS, and the median (95% CI) OS decreased from 42.5 (35.8-47.8) to 31.0 (28.8-34.4), 25.2 (20.6-27.9), and 17.7 (13.5-20.4) months respectively (P = 3.48e-11). CONCLUSIONS New immune features can be further evaluated to improve patient response. They provide the rationale for more effective immunotherapy strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Akram Yazdani
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Naim Rashid
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Scott Van Buren
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Symonds L, Yu M, Zhang Y, Ou FS, Zemla TJ, Carter K, Bertagnolli M, Innocenti F, Bosch LJ, Meijer GA, Carvalho B, Grady WM, Cohen SA. Evaluation of methylated DCR1 as a biomarker for response to adjuvant irinotecan-based therapy in stage III colon cancer: cancer and leukaemia Group B 89803 (Alliance). Epigenetics 2022; 17:1715-1725. [PMID: 35412430 PMCID: PMC9621073 DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2022.2058225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Aberrantly methylated genes contribute to the landscape of epigenetic alterations in colorectal adenocarcinoma. The global CpG Island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and individually methylated genes are potential prognostic/predictive biomarkers. Research suggests an association between methylated DCR1 (mDCR1) and lack of benefit with irinotecan (IFL) treatment. We assessed the association between DCR1 methylation status and survival in patients receiving adjuvant fluorouracil/ leucovorin (5-FU/LV) or IFL. We analysed data from patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma randomly assigned to adjuvant 5-FU/LV or IFL in CALGB 89803 (Alliance). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Using tumour sample DNA, we evaluated the association between survival, DCR1 methylation status, and molecular subgroups (BRAF, KRAS, mismatch repair status, CIMP status) using Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazard model. mDCR1 was observed in 221/400 (55%) colon cancers. Histopathologic features were similar between mDCR1 and unmethylated DCR1 (unDCR1) colon cancers. There was no difference in OS (p = 0.83) or DFS (p = 0.85) based on DCR1 methylation status. There was no association between methylation status and response to IFL . In patients with unDCR1 and KRAS-wildtype tumours, those who received IFL had a nearly two-fold worse DFS compared to patients who received 5-FU/LV (HR = 1.85, 95% CI (0.97-3.53, p = 0.06). This relationship was not notable among other subgroups. In stage III colon cancer patients, mDCR1 status did not associate with response to irinotecan. Larger studies may suggest an association between the iridocene response and molecular subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Symonds
- Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ming Yu
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - YuHong Zhang
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tyler J Zemla
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kelly Carter
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Monica Bertagnolli
- Office of the Alliance Group Chair, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Linda Jw Bosch
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William M Grady
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Stacey A Cohen
- Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lipsyc-Sharf M, Zhang S, Ou FS, Ma C, McCleary NJ, Niedzwiecki D, Chang IW, Lenz HJ, Blanke CD, Piawah S, Van Loon K, Bainter TM, Venook AP, Mayer RJ, Fuchs CS, Innocenti F, Nixon AB, Goldberg R, O’Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K. Survival in Young-Onset Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Findings From Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:427-435. [PMID: 34636852 PMCID: PMC8902338 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer (yoCRC) is increasing. It is unknown if there are survival differences between young and older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS We studied the association of age with survival in 2326 mCRC patients enrolled in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and SWOG 80405 trial, a multicenter, randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy plus biologics. The primary and secondary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively, which were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared among younger vs older patients with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on Cox proportional hazards modeling, adjusting for known prognostic variables. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Of 2326 eligible subjects, 514 (22.1%) were younger than age 50 years at study entry (yoCRC cohort). The median age of yoCRC patients was 44.3 vs 62.5 years in patients aged 50 years and older. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between yoCRC vs older-onset patients (median = 27.07 vs 26.12 months; adjusted HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.10; P = .78). The median PFS was also similar in yoCRC vs older patients (10.87 vs 10.55 months) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% CI = 0.92 to 1.13; P = .67). Patients younger than age 35 years had the shortest OS with median OS of 21.95 vs 26.12 months in older-onset patients with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% CI = 0.81 to 1.44; Ptrend = .93). CONCLUSION In this large study of mCRC patients, there were no statistically significant differences in survival between patients with yoCRC and CRC patients aged 50 years and older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla Lipsyc-Sharf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chao Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - I-Wen Chang
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair’s Office/Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sorbarikor Piawah
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany M Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Eileen M O’Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cheng E, Ou FS, Ma C, Spiegelman D, Zhang S, Zhou X, Bainter TM, Saltz LB, Niedzwiecki D, Mayer RJ, Whittom R, Hantel A, Benson A, Atienza D, Messino M, Kindler H, Giovannucci EL, Van Blarigan EL, Brown JC, Ng K, Gross CP, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS. Diet- and Lifestyle-Based Prediction Models to Estimate Cancer Recurrence and Death in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer (CALGB 89803/Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:740-751. [PMID: 34995084 PMCID: PMC8887946 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Current tools in predicting survival outcomes for patients with colon cancer predominantly rely on clinical and pathologic characteristics, but increasing evidence suggests that diet and lifestyle habits are associated with patient outcomes and should be considered to enhance model accuracy. METHODS Using an adjuvant chemotherapy trial for stage III colon cancer (CALGB 89803), we developed prediction models of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival by additionally incorporating self-reported nine diet and lifestyle factors. Both models were assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and externally validated using another trial for stage III colon cancer (CALGB/SWOG 80702), and visual nomograms of prediction models were constructed accordingly. We also proposed three hypothetical scenarios for patients with (1) good-risk, (2) average-risk, and (3) poor-risk clinical and pathologic features, and estimated their predictive survival by considering clinical and pathologic features with or without adding self-reported diet and lifestyle factors. RESULTS Among 1,024 patients (median age 60.0 years, 43.8% female), we observed 394 DFS events and 311 deaths after median follow-up of 7.3 years. Adding self-reported diet and lifestyle factors to clinical and pathologic characteristics meaningfully improved performance of prediction models (c-index from 0.64 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.67] to 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.72] for DFS, and from 0.67 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.70] to 0.71 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.75] for overall survival). External validation also indicated good performance of discrimination and calibration. Adding most self-reported favorable diet and lifestyle exposures to multivariate modeling improved 5-year DFS of all patients and by 6.3% for good-risk, 21.4% for average-risk, and 42.6% for poor-risk clinical and pathologic features. CONCLUSION Diet and lifestyle factors further inform current recurrence and survival prediction models for patients with stage III colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- En Cheng
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Chao Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Donna Spiegelman
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
- Center on Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
- Center on Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Tiffany M. Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Robert J. Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Renaud Whittom
- Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Al Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | - Edward L. Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, and Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Erin L. Van Blarigan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Justin C. Brown
- Cancer Metabolism Program, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Cary P. Gross
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Charles S. Fuchs
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, CT
- Hematology and Oncology Product Development, Genentech & Roche, South San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lipsyc-Sharf M, Ou FS, Yurgelun MB, Rubinson DA, Schrag D, Dakhil SR, Stella PJ, Weckstein DJ, Wender DB, Faggen M, Zemla TJ, Heying EN, Schuetz SR, Noble S, Meyerhardt JA, Bekaii-Saab T, Fuchs CS, Ng K. Cetuximab and Irinotecan With or Without Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: BOND-3, an ACCRU Network Randomized Clinical Trial. Oncologist 2022; 27:292-298. [PMID: 35380713 PMCID: PMC8982431 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Combination irinotecan and cetuximab is approved for irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It is unknown if adding bevacizumab improves outcomes. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial, patients with irinotecan-refractory RAS-wildtype mCRC and no prior anti-EGFR therapy were randomized to cetuximab 500 mg/m2, bevacizumab 5 mg/kg, and irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (or previously tolerated dose) (CBI) versus cetuximab, irinotecan, and placebo (CI) every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Results The study closed early after the accrual of 36 out of a planned 120 patients due to changes in funding. Nineteen patients were randomized to CBI and 17 to CI. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. Median PFS was 9.7 versus 5.5 months for CBI and CI, respectively (1-sided log-rank P = .38; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-1.66). Median OS was 19.7 versus 10.2 months for CBI and CI (1-sided log-rank P = .02; adjusted HR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15-1.09). ORR was 36.8% for CBI versus 11.8% for CI (P = .13). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 47% of patients receiving CBI versus 35% for CI (P = .46). Conclusion In this prematurely discontinued trial, there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of PFS between CBI and CI. There was a statistically significant improvement in OS in favor of CBI compared with CI. Further investigation of CBI for the treatment of irinotecan-refractory mCRC is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02292758
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla Lipsyc-Sharf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Meredith Faggen
- Dana-Farber at South Shore Hospital, South Weymouth, MA, USA
| | - Tyler J Zemla
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Erica N Heying
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lee MS, Zemla TJ, Ciombor KK, McRee AJ, Akce M, Dakhil SR, Jaszewski BL, Ou FS, Bekaii-Saab TS, Kopetz S. A randomized phase II trial of MEK and CDK4/6 inhibitors vesus tipiracil/trifluridine (TAS-102) in metastatic KRAS/NRAS mutant (mut) colorectal cancer (CRC). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
116 Background: Constitutively activating KRAS or NRAS muts occur in ̃50% of CRC, increasing RAF-MEK-ERK signaling and causing overexpression of cyclin D1, which binds to cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) to drive cell cycle progression. Combination MEK and CDK4/6 inhibitors caused tumor regression in patient-derived xenografts of KRAS mut CRC. We hypothesized that binimetinib and palbociclib (B+P) would improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared to TAS-102 in refractory KRAS/NRAS mut mCRC. Methods: ACCRU-GI-1618 was a multicenter, randomized phase II clinical trial (NCT03981614). Key inclusion criteria were KRAS/NRAS mut mCRC, with prior fluoropyrimidine/ oxaliplatin/ irinotecan/ anti-VEGF therapy. There was a 6-patient safety run-in with binimetinib 30 mg po BID D1-28 and palbociclib 100 mg po daily D1-21. After, patients were randomized 1:1 to B+P vs TAS-102 (stratified by KRAS mut type and prior regorafenib use), with optional crossover at progression. The primary endpoint was PFS; 73 PFS events (from a sample size of 112) provided 90% power to detect improvement of PFS (hazard ratio = 0.5, i.e. median PFS of 2 vs. 4 months) with 1-sided α = 0.05. A prespecified interim analysis for futility was planned after 37 PFS events were observed, with completion of accrual if 1-sided stratified log-rank p-value < 0.551. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are estimated by stratified Cox proportional hazards models. Results: After the safety run-in, 93 patients at 6 sites were randomized; 82 (41 B+P, 41 TAS-102) comprise the primary analysis population (eligible, consented, and started treatment). In this population, median age was 52 years, 50% female, 68% left-sided, 79% with KRAS codon 12/13 mut, 12% with prior regorafenib. Enrollment was halted at interim analysis as the futility boundary was crossed (1-sided p = 0.67). At final analysis, 68 subjects had a PFS event (34 in each arm). Median PFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI 2.0-3.0) with B+P vs 2.1 mo (2.0-2.4) with TAS-102; HR 0.86 (0.52-1.44). 4-mo PFS rate was 22.2% (11.9-41.6) with B+P vs 10.6% (3.8-30.0) with TAS-102. With 37 OS events (14 in B+P arm), median OS was 7.7 mo (5.1-NE) with B+P vs 6.6 mo (4.8-8.9) with TAS-102; HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.39-1.51). TAS-102 had greater grade 3-4 hematologic AEs (46% vs 22%), and B+P had more grade 3-4 non-hematologic AEs (47% vs 32%). Grade 3-4 AEs more common with B+P were fatigue (8% vs 0%), oral mucositis (6% vs 0%), and nausea (4% vs 2%). Though 63% of patients on B+P had acneiform rash, only 2% was grade 3-4. Grade 1-2 diarrhea occurred in 35% of B+P and 24% of TAS-102 patients. No new safety signal was observed. Conclusions: B+P did not significantly improve median PFS or OS compared to TAS-102 in KRAS/NRAS mut mCRC. Subgroup analyses and translational studies are ongoing to determine which subgroups may be more likely to attain 4-mo PFS or identify mechanisms of resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT03981614.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Sangmin Lee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Shaker R. Dakhil
- NSABP/NRG Oncology, and Wichita NCORP via Christi Reg. Med. Ctr, Wichita, KS
| | | | | | | | - Scott Kopetz
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Walden D, Ou FS, Larson JJ, Wu C, Kang S, Liu AJ, Griswold CR, Ueberroth BE, Patel B, Draper A, Rone K, Raman P, Bekaii-Saab TS, Ahn DH. Changes in prescribing patterns in stage III colon cancer (CC) since the IDEA collaboration. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
92 Background: Since the publication of the MOSAIC trial, stage III CC has been treated with a six-month (mo) regimen of FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Recently, the IDEA collaboration challenged this practice by demonstrating that the 3-year rate of disease-free survival (DFS) was non-inferior to 6mo of treatment (Rx) when given for low risk CC (83.1 vs. 83.3%) and resulted in significantly lower rates of grade 2 and higher neuropathy. In high risk (T4, N2) patients (pts) the DFS of 3mo of CAPOX was equivocal to 6mo (64.1 vs. 64.0%), while 3mo of FOLFOX was inferior to 6mo (61.5 vs. 64.7%). We hypothesized that trends in prescribing would favor shorter courses of Rx with a preference towards CAPOX given its efficacy across both high and low risk CC. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of stage III CC pts from 4 institutions. We evaluated prescribing patterns of 3mo or 6mo of Rx and CAPOX vs. FOLFOX over a period of 5 years from Jan 2016 to Jan 2021, a time period that traverses before and after the release of IDEA. Logistic and multinomial logistic regression models, with a linear time trend, were used to estimate the percentage of pts receiving CAPOX vs. FOLFOX and the combination of Rx and duration, respectively, while adjusting for baseline characteristics. The prescribing patterns in important subgroups were examined by incorporating the interaction term in the models. Results: A total of 366 pts met inclusion criteria. From 2016-2021, there was a significant increase per quarter in patients treated with CAPOX when compared to FOLFOX (OR 1.16 95% CI 1.11 – 1.21, p <.001). Prior to IDEA, 78.3% of pts received 6mo FOLFOX and 7.4% received 3mo CAPOX. Two years after IDEA, only 17.3% of pts were on 6mo FOLFOX compared to 67.5% of pts on 3mo CAPOX (Table). At present, high risk pts are more likely to receive 6mo FOLFOX (47.8%) than 3mo of FOLFOX (3.9%), 3mo CAPOX (25.8%), or 6mo CAPOX (22.4%). Low risk pts are more likely to receive 3mo of CAPOX (67.9%) than other Rx. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that since IDEA, physician practice has significantly changed in favor of CAPOX and shorter courses of Rx. The use of CAPOX has significantly increased overall, presumably due to its efficacy across all risk groups and relatively reduced toxicity.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sandra Kang
- Emory University School of Medicine Hematology/Oncology, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Cassia R Griswold
- Huntsman Cancer Institute - University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Amber Draper
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kelley Rone
- Mayo Clinic Arizona Division Hematology Oncology, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ahn DH, Ou FS, Sonbol BB, Wender D, Klute K, Jin Z, Jones JC, Ulrich A, Waechter B, Young H, Weinberg BA, Lenz HJ, Strickler JH, Bekaii-Saab TS. REVERCEII (ACCRU-GI-1809): A randomized phase II study of regorafenib followed by anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy versus the reverse sequencing for metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.tps213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS213 Background: Regorafenib (R) is an oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks several protein kinases involved in angiogenesis and oncogenesis; it has a survival benefit in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The current standard (std) treatment in patients (pts) with RAS wildtype (WT) mCRC is sequential treatment with an anti-EGFR antibody (AEA) followed by R. However, R, which is orally administered once daily, may be more convenient and thus preferable for pts than AEA. REVERCE, a Japanese trial, demonstrated a significant 5.8 month (mo.) survival benefit with regorafenib administered prior to AEA compared to the std sequence. Based off these findings, the proposed phase II trial is to confirm the observed survival benefit from regorafenib sequencing prior to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy in REVERCE in a US patient population. Methods: REVERCEII is an Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) network-led randomized phase II study of R (dose escalation from 80mg to 160mg based on tolerance) prior to AEA (R+AEA) compared to standard sequencing (AEA+R) in pts with refractory RAS WT mCRC. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive R (Arm A) vs. AEA (with or without irinotecan per investigator choice) (Arm B). At the time of disease progression or intolerance, patients will receive sequential treatment until disease progression. Eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed mCRC, ECOG ≤ 2, acceptable organ function, and patients must have had prior fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and no prior AEA nor R. The primary objective is to compare the overall survival (OS), the primary endpoint, between evaluable patients (eligible, consented, started protocol treatment) who were randomized to R+AEA (arm A) and AEA+R (arm B). With 83 OS events, we have 87% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 9 months to 14.5 mo., assuming 1-sided significance level of 0.15, and exponential distribution. The total sample size is 124 patients. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, objective response, and adverse events. The total study duration is expected to be 3 years. Clinical trial information: NCT04117945. Clinical trial information: 04117945.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bassam Bassam Sonbol
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Kelsey Klute
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Zhaohui Jin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin Adam Weinberg
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Raghav KPS, Ou FS, Venook AP, Innocenti F, Sun R, Lenz HJ, Kopetz S. Circulating tumor DNA dynamics on front-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: A biomarker analysis for acquired genomic alterations in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance) randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
193 Background: Enhanced understanding of the evolving clonal architecture under treatment stress is crucial to optimizing care and developing effective therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Emergence of genomic alterations (GAs) [mutations (muts) and amplifications (amps)] in RAS, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, and MET have been recognized as key resistance mechanisms to anti-EGFR therapy in later lines in mCRC. Data regarding occurrence of these GAs under selective pressure in the first line setting is lacking. Methods: CALGB/SWOG 80405 was a randomized trial of bevacizumab (bev) vs cetuximab (cet) in first line mCRC. Patients (pts) with paired plasma samples (pre-treatment and post-progression) available for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing were included in this substudy. Sequencing of ctDNA was performed by Guardant360 assay in a CLIA-certified environment to detect GAs in 73 genes. RAS/BRAF status [mut vs. wild type (wt)] was based on clonal muts [pre-defined cutoff of relative MAF (rMAF) ≥ 25%] in ctDNA. Only samples with ≥1 GA were analyzed to minimize false negatives. The primary objective was to determine and compare prevalence of acquired GAs between study arms: bev (anti-VEGF) and cet (anti-EGFR). Descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test were used. Results: Baseline characteristics of ctDNA cohort were similar to the 80405 population. Among 133 randomized RAS/BRAF wt pts, 11 (15.3%) and 5 (8.2%) developed acquired GAs (OR 2.0, P = 0.29), in bev and cet arm, respectively. Key comparative data for pts with regard to acquired pathogenic GAs are shown in the table. Conclusions: In this randomized mCRC cohort, the ctDNA profile of acquired GAs with front line anti-EGFR chemotherapy appears to be strikingly distinct from that seen with later lines of therapy. Acquisition of GAs, classically associated with EGFR resistance in later line, was not only rare with upfront cet-chemotherapy but also comparable to bev-containing (anti-VEGF) regimen. The mechanisms of acquired resistance appear to differ when anti-EGFR therapy is administered in combination with highly active first line chemotherapy. Our findings have critical translational relevance to the timing and value of ctDNA-guided anti-EGFR rechallenge in mCRC pts, especially in those treated with anti-EGFR therapy upfront.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Ryan Sun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Scott Kopetz
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mettu NB, Ou FS, Zemla TJ, Halfdanarson TR, Lenz HJ, Breakstone RA, Boland PM, Crysler OV, Wu C, Nixon AB, Bolch E, Niedzwiecki D, Elsing A, Hurwitz HI, Fakih MG, Bekaii-Saab T. Assessment of Capecitabine and Bevacizumab With or Without Atezolizumab for the Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2149040. [PMID: 35179586 PMCID: PMC8857687 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.49040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Cotargeting vascular endothelial growth factor and programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 may produce anticancer activity in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The clinical benefit of atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab remains unclear for the treatment of mCRC. OBJECTIVES To assess whether the addition of atezolizumab to capecitabine and bevacizumab therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with refractory mCRC and to perform exploratory analyses among patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) disease and liver metastasis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This double-blind phase 2 randomized clinical trial enrolled 133 patients between September 25, 2017, and June 28, 2018 (median duration of follow-up for PFS, 20.9 months), with data cutoff on May 4, 2020. The study was conducted at multiple centers through the Academic and Community Cancer Research United network. Adult patients with mCRC who experienced disease progression while receiving fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bevacizumab, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy (if the patient had a RAS wild-type tumor) were included. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive capecitabine (850 or 1000 mg/m2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) on day 1 plus either atezolizumab (1200 mg; investigational group) or placebo (placebo group) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was PFS; 110 events were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 with 80% power (1-sided α = .10). Secondary end points were objective response rate, overall survival (OS), and toxic effects. RESULTS Of 133 randomized patients, 128 individuals (median age, 58.0 years [IQR, 51.0-65.0 years]; 77 men [60.2%]) were assessed for efficacy (82 in the investigational group and 46 in the placebo group). Overall, 15 patients (11.7%) self-identified as African American or Black, 8 (6.3%) as Asian, 1 (0.8%) as Pacific Islander, 101 (78.9%) as White, 1 (0.8%) as multiple races (Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and White), and 2 (1.6%) as unknown race or unsure of race. Microsatellite-stable disease was present in 110 patients (69 in the investigational group and 41 in the placebo group). Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.4 months) in the investigational group and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.2-6.2 months) in the placebo group (1-sided log-rank P = .07, a statistically significant result; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52-1.09). Among patients with MSS and proficient mismatch repair, the HR for PFS was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44-0.99). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events in the investigational vs placebo groups were hypertension (6 patients [7.0%] vs 2 patients [4.3%]), diarrhea (6 patients [7.0%] vs 2 patients [4.3%]), and hand-foot syndrome (6 patients [7.0%] vs 2 patients [4.3%]). One treatment-related death occurred in the investigational group. In the investigational group, the response rate was higher among patients without liver metastasis (3 of 13 individuals [23.1%]) vs with liver metastasis (4 of 69 individuals [5.8%]). The benefit of atezolizumab for PFS and OS was greater among patients without vs with liver metastasis (primary analysis of PFS: HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.27-1.47] vs 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51-1.17]; OS: HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11-1.02] vs 1.14 [95% CI, 0.72-1.81]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of atezolizumab to capecitabine and bevacizumab therapy provided limited (ie, not clinically meaningful) clinical benefit. Patients with MSS and proficient mismatch repair tumors and those without liver metastasis benefited more from dual inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor and programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 pathways. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02873195.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niharika B. Mettu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tyler J. Zemla
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Rimini A. Breakstone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Patrick M. Boland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Oxana V. Crysler
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Christina Wu
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Andrew B. Nixon
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Emily Bolch
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Clinical Research, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alicia Elsing
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Herbert I. Hurwitz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California
| | - Marwan G. Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ma WW, Zemla TJ, Walden D, McWilliams RR, Shaib WL, Ahn DH, El-Rayes BF, Halfdanarson TR, Hobday TJ, Bruggeman S, Jaszewski BL, Ou FS, Wu C, Bekaii-Saab TS. A phase I study of pharmacokinetic (PK)-driven sequential dosing of rucaparib (RUB) with irinotecan liposome (nal-IRI) and fluorouracil (5FU) in metastatic gastrointestinal (mGI) and pancreas (PANC) cancers. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
563 Background: RUB is an oral PARP1,2,3 inhibitor that demonstrated efficacy in patients (pts) with ovarian and prostate cancers harboring deleterious BRCA mutations. RUB exerts synergistic anti-tumor effect with IRI preclinically though the combination has overlapping toxicities. We previously published on the population PK of nal-IRI (Adiwijaya, Ma et al, Clin Pharm Ther 2017). We conducted a phase I study to evaluate a novel sequential dosing of RUB with nal-IRI/5FU in mGI cancer pts. Methods: Eligible pts had incurable mGI cancer previously received > 1 line of therapy (rx), ECOG PS 0-1, had RECIST measurable disease, adequate organ reserves and not received IRI for metastatic disease. Previous PARPi rx was excluded. The endpoints included dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile. The dose escalation utilized the 3+3 design. RUB was given oral bid on Day 4 to 13 and 18 to 27 with nal-IRI i.v. and 5FU i.v. 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hr on Day 1 and 15, every 28 day. Planned dose levels were RUB 400 mg/nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 (DL1), 400 mg/70 mg/m2 (DL2) and 600 mg/70 mg/m2 (DL3). Adverse events (AEs) were scored per CTCAE v4.03. Molecular profile was evaluated by CLIA-certified NGS testing. Results: Eighteen pts including 11 colorectal (CRC), 6 PANC, 1 gastroesophageal (GE) were enrolled and 12 were evaluable for DLTs. DL2 was not tolerable (DLT: G3 diarrhea, nausea and vomiting) and DL2A was added (RUB 600 mg/nal-IRI 50 mg/m2). DL2A enrolled 6 pts with no DLT and was determined as the MTD. Of DLT-evaluable pts, G3 and worse treatment-related AEs from all cycles were diarrhea (33%), fatigue (25%), leukopenia (25%), neutropenia (25%), anemia (8%) and nausea (8%). Four of 12 response evaluable pts had partial response: 2 CRC (1 had ATM mut), 1 PANC ( ATM mut), 1 GE ( BRCA2 mut) whilst 3 responders previously had platinum (PLA). Five pts had stable disease beyond 16 weeks (range 18.9 to 100.7 weeks), and all had prior PLA. Conclusions: The study successfully determined the MTD of RUB in combination with nal-IRI and 5FU. Encouraging efficacy was observed in PLA-treated mGI cancers including responses in those harboring ATM and BRCA alterations. The study is proceeding to evaluate the efficacy of the combination in metastatic pancreas cancer pts with and without BRCA1/2 or PALB2 alterations. Clinical trial information: NCT03337087.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Wee Ma
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Walid Labib Shaib
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Bassel F. El-Rayes
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Van Blarigan EL, Ou FS, Bainter TM, Fuchs CS, Niedzwiecki D, Zhang S, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Hantel A, Benson AB, Atienza D, Messino M, Kindler HL, Venook AP, Ogino S, Sanoff HK, Giovannucci EL, Ng K, Meyerhardt JA. Associations Between Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat With Risk of Recurrence and Mortality in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e220145. [PMID: 35191970 PMCID: PMC8864503 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance The American Cancer Society and American Institute for Cancer Research recommend that cancer survivors limit intake of red and processed meats. This recommendation is based on consistent associations between red and processed meat intake and cancer risk, particularly risk of colorectal cancer, but fewer data are available on red and processed meat intake after cancer diagnosis. Objectives To examine whether intake of unprocessed red meat or processed meat is associated with risk of cancer recurrence or mortality in patients with colon cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study used data from participants with stage III colon cancer enrolled in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 89803/Alliance) trial between 1999 and 2001. The clinical database for this analysis was frozen on November 9, 2009; the current data analyses were finalized in December 2021. Exposures Quartiles of unprocessed red meat and processed meat intake assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire during and 6 months after chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for risk of cancer recurrence or death and all-cause mortality. Results This study was conducted among 1011 patients with stage III colon cancer. The median (IQR) age at enrollment was 60 (51-69) years, 442 patients (44%) were women, and 899 patients (89%) were White. Over a median (IQR) follow-up period of 6.6 (1.9-7.5) years, we observed 305 deaths and 81 recurrences without death during follow-up (386 events combined). Intake of unprocessed red meat or processed meat after colon cancer diagnosis was not associated with risk of recurrence or mortality. The multivariable HRs comparing the highest vs lowest quartiles for cancer recurrence or death were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.58-1.23) for unprocessed red meat and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.75-1.47) for processed meat. For all-cause mortality, the corresponding HRs were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.47-1.07) for unprocessed red meat and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.72-1.51) for processed meat. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, postdiagnosis intake of unprocessed red meat or processed meat was not associated with risk of recurrence or death among patients with stage III colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L. Van Blarigan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
- Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tiffany M. Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Charles S. Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sui Zhang
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Al B. Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Michael Messino
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Mission Hospitals, Inc, Asheville, North Carolina
| | - Hedy L. Kindler
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alan P. Venook
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Program in Molecular Pathology Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge
| | - Hanna K. Sanoff
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill
| | - Edward L. Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Snyder RA, He J, Le-Rademacher J, Ou FS, Dodge AB, Zemla TJ, Paskett ED, Chang GJ, Innocenti F, Blanke C, Lenz HJ, Polite BN, Venook AP. Racial differences in survival and response to therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A secondary analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance A151931). Cancer 2021; 127:3801-3808. [PMID: 34374082 PMCID: PMC8478698 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between self-identified race and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy among patients enrolled in the randomized Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial. METHODS Patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were identified by race. On the basis of covariates (treatment arm, KRAS status, sex, age, and body mass index), each Black patient was exact matched with a White patient. The association between race and OS and PFS was examined using a marginal Cox proportional hazard model for matched pairs. The interaction between KRAS status and race was tested in the model. The association between race and response to therapy and adverse events were examined using a marginal logistic regression model. RESULTS In total, 392 patients were matched and included in the final data set. No difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.16), PFS (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78-1.20), or response to therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.52) was observed between Black and White patients. Patients with KRAS mutant status (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.67), a performance statusscore of 1 (reference, a performance status of 0; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.88), or ≥3 metastatic sites (reference, 1 metastatic site; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.22-2.28) experienced worse OS. Black patients experienced lower rates and risk of grade ≥3 fatigue (6.6% vs 13.3%; OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91) but were equally likely to be treated with a dose reduction (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.72-1.65). CONCLUSIONS No difference in OS, PFS, or response to therapy was observed between Black patients and White patients in an equal treatment setting of the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized controlled trial. LAY SUMMARY Despite improvements in screening and treatment, studies have demonstrated worse outcomes in Black patients with colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in cancer-specific outcomes among Black and White patients receiving equivalent treatment on the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized clinical trial. In this study, there was no difference in overall survival, progression-free survival, or response to therapy between Black and White patients treated on a clinical trial. These findings suggest that access to care and differences in treatment may be responsible for racial disparities in colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A. Snyder
- Department of Surgery and Public Health, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University. Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Jun He
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic. Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic. Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Andrew B. Dodge
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic. Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tyler J. Zemla
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic. Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - George J. Chang
- Departments of Surgical Oncology and Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Houston, Texas
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Charles Blanke
- Southwest Oncology Group Chair’s Office and Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University. Portland, Oregon
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Department of Preventative Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles. Los Angeles, California
| | - Blase N. Polite
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center. Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alan P. Venook
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco. San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Goodman KA, Ou FS, Hall NC, Bekaii-Saab T, Fruth B, Twohy E, Meyers MO, Boffa DJ, Mitchell K, Frankel WL, Niedzwiecki D, Noonan A, Janjigian YY, Thurmes PJ, Venook AP, Meyerhardt JA, O'Reilly EM, Ilson DH. Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response-Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2803-2815. [PMID: 34077237 PMCID: PMC8407649 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the use of early assessment of chemotherapy responsiveness by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to tailor therapy in patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS After baseline PET, patients were randomly assigned to an induction chemotherapy regimen: modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX) or carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP). Repeat PET was performed after induction; change in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) from baseline was assessed. PET nonresponders (< 35% decrease in SUV) crossed over to the alternative chemotherapy during chemoradiation (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). PET responders (≥ 35% decrease in SUV) continued on the same chemotherapy during chemoradiation. Patients underwent surgery at 6 weeks postchemoradiation. Primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in nonresponders after switching chemotherapy. RESULTS Two hundred forty-one eligible patients received Protocol treatment, of whom 225 had an evaluable repeat PET. The pCR rates for PET nonresponders after induction FOLFOX who crossed over to CP (n = 39) or after induction CP who changed to FOLFOX (n = 50) was 18.0% (95% CI, 7.5 to 33.5) and 20% (95% CI, 10 to 33.7), respectively. The pCR rate in responders who received induction FOLFOX was 40.3% (95% CI, 28.9 to 52.5) and 14.1% (95% CI, 6.6 to 25.0) in responders to CP. With a median follow-up of 5.2 years, median overall survival was 48.8 months (95% CI, 33.2 months to not estimable) for PET responders and 27.4 months (95% CI, 19.4 months to not estimable) for nonresponders. For induction FOLFOX patients who were PET responders, median survival was not reached. CONCLUSION Early response assessment using PET imaging as a biomarker to individualize therapy for patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma was effective, improving pCR rates in PET nonresponders. PET responders to induction FOLFOX who continued on FOLFOX during chemoradiation achieved a promising 5-year overall survival of 53%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Nathan C. Hall
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Briant Fruth
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Erin Twohy
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Noonan
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Paul J. Thurmes
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Alan P. Venook
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ou FS, Tang J, An MW, Mandrekar SJ. Modeling tumor measurement data to predict overall survival (OS) in cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2021; 23:100827. [PMID: 34430754 PMCID: PMC8365311 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Longitudinal tumor measurements (TM) are commonly recorded in cancer clinical trials of solid tumors. To define patient response to treatment, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) categorizes the otherwise continuous measurements, which results in substantial information loss. We investigated two modeling approaches to incorporate all available cycle-by-cycle (continuous) TM to predict overall survival (OS) and compare the predictive accuracy of these two approaches to RECIST. Material and methods Joint modeling (JM) for longitudinal TM and OS and two-stage modeling with potential time-varying coefficients were utilized to predict OS using data from three trials with cycle-by-cycle TM. The JM approach incorporates TM data collected throughout the course of the clinical trial. The two-stage modeling approach incorporates information from early assessments (before 12 weeks) to predict subsequent OS outcome. The predictive accuracy was quantified by c-indices. Results Data from 577, 337, and 126 patients were included for the analysis (from two stage IV colorectal cancer trials (N9741, N9841) and an advanced non-small cell lung cancer trial (N0026), respectively). Both the JM and two-stage modeling reached a similar conclusion, i.e. the baseline covariates (age, gender, and race) were mostly not predictive of OS (p-value > 0.05). Quantities derived from TM were strong predictors of OS in the two colorectal cancer trials (p < 0.001 for both association in JM and two-stage modeling parameters); but less so in the lung cancer trial (p = 0.053 for association in JM and p = 0.024 and 0.160 for two-stage modeling parameters). The c-indices from the two-stage modeling were higher than those from a model using RECIST (range: 0.611–0.633 versus 0.586–0.590). The dynamic c-indices from the JM were in the range of 0.627–0.683 indicating good predictive accuracy. Conclusion Both modeling approaches provide highly interpretable and clinical meaningful results; the improved predictive performance compared with RECIST indicates the possibility of deriving better trial endpoints from these approaches. Two-stage modeling incorporating time-varying coefficients achieves better predictive accuracy than RECIST-alone. Two–stage modeling offers the possibility of alternative endpoint definition. Serial tumor measurements can be incorporated in OS prediction using joint modeling. Joint modeling can potentially guide individualized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Shu Ou
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jun Tang
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Ming-Wen An
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Francini E, Ou FS, Rhoades J, Wolfe EG, O’Connor EP, Ha G, Gydush G, Kelleher KM, Bhatt RS, Balk SP, Sweeney CJ, Adalsteinsson VA, Taplin ME, Choudhury AD. Circulating Cell-Free DNA as Biomarker of Taxane Resistance in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4055. [PMID: 34439209 PMCID: PMC8391478 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
There are no biomarkers predictive of resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel validated for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We assessed the association between ABCB1 amplification and primary resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel for patients with mCRPC, using circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Patients with ≥1 plasma sample drawn within 12 months before starting docetaxel (cohort A) or cabazitaxel (cohort B) for mCRPC were identified from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute IRB approved database. Sparse whole genome sequencing was performed on the selected cfDNA samples and tumor fractions were estimated using the computational tool ichorCNA. We evaluated the association between ABCB1 amplification or other copy number alterations and primary resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel. Of the selected 176 patients, 45 samples in cohort A and 21 samples in cohort B had sufficient tumor content. No significant association was found between ABCB1 amplification and primary resistance to docetaxel (p = 0.58; odds ratio (OR) = 1.49) or cabazitaxel (p = 0.97; OR = 1.06). No significant association was found between exploratory biomarkers and primary resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel. In this study, ABCB1 amplification did not predict primary resistance to docetaxel or cabazitaxel for mCRPC. Future studies including ABCB1 amplification in a suite of putative biomarkers and a larger cohort may aid in drawing definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Francini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (E.P.O.); (G.H.); (K.M.K.); (C.J.S.); (M.-E.T.); (A.D.C.)
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (F.-S.O.); (E.G.W.)
| | - Justin Rhoades
- Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; (J.R.); (G.G.); (V.A.A.)
| | - Eric G. Wolfe
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (F.-S.O.); (E.G.W.)
| | - Edward P. O’Connor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (E.P.O.); (G.H.); (K.M.K.); (C.J.S.); (M.-E.T.); (A.D.C.)
| | - Gavin Ha
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (E.P.O.); (G.H.); (K.M.K.); (C.J.S.); (M.-E.T.); (A.D.C.)
- Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; (J.R.); (G.G.); (V.A.A.)
| | - Gregory Gydush
- Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; (J.R.); (G.G.); (V.A.A.)
| | - Kaitlin M. Kelleher
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (E.P.O.); (G.H.); (K.M.K.); (C.J.S.); (M.-E.T.); (A.D.C.)
| | - Rupal S. Bhatt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (R.S.B.); (S.P.B.)
| | - Steven P. Balk
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (R.S.B.); (S.P.B.)
| | - Christopher J. Sweeney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (E.P.O.); (G.H.); (K.M.K.); (C.J.S.); (M.-E.T.); (A.D.C.)
| | - Viktor A. Adalsteinsson
- Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; (J.R.); (G.G.); (V.A.A.)
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (E.P.O.); (G.H.); (K.M.K.); (C.J.S.); (M.-E.T.); (A.D.C.)
| | - Atish D. Choudhury
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (E.P.O.); (G.H.); (K.M.K.); (C.J.S.); (M.-E.T.); (A.D.C.)
- Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; (J.R.); (G.G.); (V.A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gile JJ, Ou FS, Mahipal A, Larson JJ, Mody K, Jin Z, Hubbard J, Halfdanarson T, Alberts SR, Jatoi A, McWilliams RR, Ma WW, Ilyas S, Smoot R, Roberts L, Gores G, Borad M, Bekaii-Saab TS, Tran NH. FGFR Inhibitor Toxicity and Efficacy in Cholangiocarcinoma: Multicenter Single-Institution Cohort Experience. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:PO.21.00064. [PMID: 34778691 PMCID: PMC8575436 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are a group of heterogeneous tumors arising from the biliary epithelia. Significant sequencing efforts have provided further insights into the molecular mechanisms of this disease including fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations, which occurs in approximately 15%-20% of intrahepatic CCAs. Herein, we describe the FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi)-associated treatment toxicity and cancer-specific outcomes from a multicenter single-institution cohort. METHODS This is a retrospective study of patients with CCA and known FGFR alterations treated with FGFRi. We describe the toxicity and efficacy in patients treated at Mayo Clinic between January 2010 and December 2020. RESULTS Our group identified 61 patients with advanced or metastatic CCA, 19 males (31%) and 42 females (69%), harboring FGFR alterations who received FGFRi. The most common grade 1 or higher adverse events for all patients included fatigue (92%), AST elevations (78%), anemia (80%), decreased platelet count (63%), and hyperphosphatemia (74%). Median progression-free survival on FGFRi was 5.8 months for all patients (95% CI, 4.9 to 9.0). Females had significantly longer progression-free survival at 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 11.8) on FGFRi compared with males at 4.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 to not estimable; P = .038). CONCLUSION FGFRi are well tolerated with clinical efficacy. With the recent approval of FGFRi by the US Food and Drug Administration and ongoing clinical trials for new FGFRi, understanding outcomes and toxicity associated with these medications is important for precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joseph J. Larson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kabir Mody
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, FL USA
| | - Zhaohui Jin
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joleen Hubbard
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Steven R. Alberts
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Aminah Jatoi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Wen Wee Ma
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sumera Ilyas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Rory Smoot
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Lewis Roberts
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gregory Gores
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mitesh Borad
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | | | - Nguyen H. Tran
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yoon HH, Ou FS, Soori GS, Shi Q, Wigle DA, Sticca RP, Miller RC, Leenstra JL, Peller PJ, Ginos B, Heying E, Wu TT, Drevyanko TF, Ko S, Mattar BI, Nikcevich DA, Behrens RJ, Khalil MF, Kim GP, Alberts SR. Induction versus no induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a multicentre randomised phase II trial (NCCTG N0849 [Alliance]). Eur J Cancer 2021; 150:214-223. [PMID: 33934058 PMCID: PMC8154661 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM report primary results from the first multicentre randomised trial evaluating induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy in patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Notably, recent data from a single-institution randomised trial reported that induction chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours. METHODS In this phase 2 trial (28 centres in the U.S. NCI-sponsored North Central Cancer Treatment Group [Alliance]), trimodality-eligible patients (T3-4N0, TanyN+) were randomised to receive induction (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine; Arm A) or no induction chemotherapy (Arm B) followed by oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/radiation and subsequent surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response (pathCR). Secondary/exploratory endpoints were OS and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Of 55 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, the pathCR rate was 28.6% (8/28) in A versus 40.7% (11/27) in B (P = .34). Given interim results indicating futility, accrual was terminated, but patients were followed. After a median follow-up of 60.4 months, a longer median OS in Arm A versus B was unexpectedly observed (3-year rates 57.1% versus 41.7%, respectively) driven by longer DFS after margin-free surgery. In posthoc analysis, induction (versus no induction) chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer OS and DFS among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours, but not among patients with poorly/undifferentiated tumours (Pinteraction = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS Adding induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy did not improve the primary endpoint, pathCR. However, induction chemotherapy was associated with longer median OS, particularly among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours. These findings may inform further development of curative-intent trials in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Brenda Ginos
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Erica Heying
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maged F Khalil
- Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, PA, USA.
| | - George P Kim
- 21(st) Century Oncology of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Innocenti F, Yazdani A, Qu X, Ou FS, Van Buren S, Kabbarah O, Blanke CD, Venook AP, Lenz HJ, Vincent BG. Immune signatures to affect overall survival (OS) and response to bevacizumab (Bev) or cetuximab (Cet) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3515 Background: CALGB/SWOG 80405 was a randomized phase III trial in first-line mCRC patients treated with Bev, Cet, or both, plus chemotherapy. No difference in OS was found between Bev and Cet. We tested the effect of immune signatures on OS in all the three arms of the study and analyzed differences in OS between the Cet and Bev arms. Methods: 578 primary tumors were profiled by RNAseq. Immune signatures of TGF-β, cytotoxic T cells, wound healing, macrophages, lymphocytes, and INF-γ, as well as relative frequencies of CD8+ T-cells, memory resting CD4+ T cells, memory activated CD4+ T cells, macrophages M1 and M2, and activated mast cells were measured. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were applied using elastic-net penalization with covariates (age, race, gender, all RAS and BRAF V600E mutations). For relevant signatures, optimal cut-offs for OS were calculated. Results: In all the three arms of the study, high expression of macrophages M2 (HR 6.81, 95% CI 3.56-30.16) and TGF-β (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.03-2.10) conferred reduced OS compared to low expression; high expression of plasma cells (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.83) and memory-activated CD4+ T cells (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.10-0.65) conferred increased OS compared to low expression. Using optimal cut-offs from these 4 signatures, pts have been categorized as to whether they had either 4, 3, 2, 1, or 0 beneficial signatures associated with increased OS. In all arms of the study (N = 469, after accounting for covariates), the median (95% CI) OS decreased from 42.5 (35.8-47.8; N = 79), to 31.0 (28.8-34.4; N = 177), 25.2 (20.6-27.9; N = 144), and 17.0 (13.5-20.4; N = 69) months when the number of beneficial signatures decreased from 4, to 3, 2, and 0-1 (combined due to a low number of pts), respectively (p = 3.48e-11). In the Bev arm (N = 205), high expression of macrophages M2 conferred reduced OS compared to low expression (HR 6.6, 95% CI 2.7-67.1). In the Cet arm (N = 165), high expression of macrophages M2 conferred reduced OS compared to low expression (HR 4.3, 95% CI 2.1-79.8); high expression of plasma cells (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.06-0.55) and memory activated CD4+ T cells (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.03-0.98) conferred increased OS compared to low expression of either signatures. The plasma cell signature interacted with Bev and Cet on the OS of pts (interaction p = 0.009). Conclusions: Tumor immune signatures in mCRC pts are determinants of survival. In pts treated with Bev- and Cet-combination therapies that are standard of care, immune signatures affect response to therapy. These results, provide new markers for treatment selection and for the development of novel active combinations including immune checkpoint inhibitors. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Akram Yazdani
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Scott Van Buren
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
DiNardo K, Ma C, Ou FS, Yuan C, Guercio BJ, Morales-Oyarvide V, Van Blarigan E, Niedzwiecki D, Chang IW, Lenz HJ, Blanke CD, Venook AP, Mayer RJ, Fuchs CS, Innocenti F, Nixon AB, Goldberg RM, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K. Influence of dietary insulin scores on survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Findings from CALGB (Alliance) 80405. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3568 Background: Diets inducing an elevated insulin response have been associated with increased recurrence and mortality in patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, but it remains unknown if postprandial hyperinsulinemia also affects progression and mortality in mCRC patients. The goal of this study was to assess the influence of dietary insulin load (DIL) and dietary insulin index (DII) on survival of mCRC patients. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of 1,177 patients with previously untreated mCRC enrolled in a phase III trial of systemic chemotherapy plus biologics who reported dietary intake within one month after chemotherapy initiation. DIL was calculated as a function of food insulin index and the energy content of individual foods reported on a food frequency questionnaire. DII was calculated by dividing DIL by total energy intake. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The primary statistical test was a test for trend, which was performed using the median value for each quintile of dietary insulin score as a continuous variable. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to adjust for potential confounders including assigned treatment arm, known prognostic factors, comorbidities, body mass index, and physical activity. Results: Higher DIL was significantly associated with worse OS (ptrend = 0.04); patients in the highest quintile survived 34.1 months, compared to 27.7 months in the lowest quintile (Cox hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99 - 1.51). Higher DII was non-significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.94 - 1.48, ptrend = 0.09). There was no significant association between dietary insulin scores and PFS. The influence of dietary insulin scores on survival did not differ significantly by various molecular markers involved in the insulin signaling pathway, including C-peptide, adiponectin, IGF-1, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-7. Higher dietary insulin scores were significantly associated with greater risk of any TRAE. Those with a DIL greater than the median had a 75.4% rate of any TRAE, compared to 70.8% in those with a DIL less than or equal to the median (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.38, p=0.02); the most significant associations were with neutropenia (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.61, p=0.01) and diarrhea (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.00 - 2.06, p=0.05). Conclusions: Higher DIL was significantly associated with worse OS, and both higher DIL and DII were significantly associated with increased TRAEs, in patients with previously untreated mCRC. These findings may inform future dietary recommendations for patients with mCRC. Further investigation into the molecular mechanisms underlying these associations is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT00265850.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | | | - Chen Yuan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, NC
| | - I-Wen Chang
- Southeastern Medical Oncology, Goldsboro, NC
| | | | | | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Van Blarigan E, Ma C, Ou FS, Venook AP, Ng K, Niedzwiecki D, Giovannucci EL, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, Shaw JE, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, O'Reilly EM, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Dietary fat in relation to overall and progression-free survival among patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC): Data from CALGB 80405 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3588 Background: Growing data suggest dietary factors are associated with survival among pts with non-metastatic CRC. However, data on diet and survival among pts with advanced or metastatic disease are very limited. Methods: We prospectively examined dietary fat intake assessed at initiation of treatment for advanced or metastatic CRC in relation to OS and PFS. This analysis was conducted among 1,149 pts in the CALGB 80405 randomized controlled trial who completed a validated food frequency questionnaire. We examined intakes of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated (total n-3, long-chain n-3, and total n-6) fats as well as animal and vegetable fats. Based on data from non-metastatic CRC and other cancers, we hypothesized that higher intakes of long-chain n-3 fatty acids and vegetable fats would be associated with longer OS and PFS and higher intakes of saturated fat and animal fat would be associated with shorter OS and PFS. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Over a median follow-up of 6.1 years [y; interquartile range (IQR): 5.3, 7.2 y], we observed 974 deaths and 103 events of progression without death during follow-up. Participants in this analysis had a median age of 59 y (IQR: 51 to 67 y); 41% were female and 86% identified as white. We observed no statistically significant associations between any type of dietary fat and OS. However, vegetable fat was non-linearly associated with longer PFS (HR comparing 4th to 1st quartile: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.96; p-trend: 0.10). We also observed a linear association between continuous saturated fat and PFS (HR per 5% kcal/d: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.42; p-value: 0.02), perhaps driven by pts with high saturated fat intake. Conclusions: We observed no statistically significant associations between types of dietary fat and OS among pts with advanced or metastatic CRC. However, a healthy diet that includes vegetable fat and is modest in saturated fat may be associated with longer PFS. Future studies to replicate these findings and examine diet in relation to cancer survival in racially/ethnically diverse populations are needed. Support: K07CA197077, U10CA180821, U10CA180882, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT00265850.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | | | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, NC
| | - Edward L. Giovannucci
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lee S, Zhang S, Ma C, Ou FS, Wolfe EG, Ogino S, Niedzwiecki D, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Mowat RB, Whittom R, Hantel A, Benson A, Atienza D, Messino M, Kindler H, Venook A, Gross CP, Irwin ML, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS. Race, Income, and Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer: CALGB 89803 (Alliance). JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab034. [PMID: 34104867 PMCID: PMC8178799 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Disparities in colon cancer outcomes have been reported across race and socioeconomic status, which may reflect, in part, access to care. We sought to assess the influences of race and median household income (MHI) on outcomes among colon cancer patients with similar access to care. Methods We conducted a prospective, observational study of 1206 stage III colon cancer patients enrolled in the CALGB 89803 randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial. Race was self-reported by 1116 White and 90 Black patients at study enrollment; MHI was determined by matching 973 patients’ home zip codes with publicly available US Census 2000 data. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for baseline sociodemographic, clinical, dietary, and lifestyle factors. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Over a median follow-up of 7.7 years, the adjusted hazard ratios for Blacks (compared with Whites) were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 1.35, P = .75) for disease-free survival, 0.91 (95% CI = 0.62 to 1.35, P = .65) for recurrence-free survival, and 1.07 (95% CI = 0.73 to 1.57, P = .73) for overall survival. Relative to patients in the highest MHI quartile, the adjusted hazard ratios for patients in the lowest quartile were 0.90 (95% CI = 0.67 to 1.19, Ptrend = .18) for disease-free survival, 0.89 (95% CI = 0.66 to 1.22, Ptrend = .14) for recurrence-free survival, and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.63 to 1.19, Ptrend = .23) for overall survival. Conclusions In this study of patients with similar health-care access, no statistically significant differences in outcomes were found by race or MHI. The substantial gaps in outcomes previously observed by race and MHI may not be rooted in differences in tumor biology but rather in access to quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chao Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eric G Wolfe
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rex B Mowat
- Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program, Toledo, OH, USA
| | | | - Alexander Hantel
- Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - Al Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Michael Messino
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Mission Hospitals, Asheville, NC, USA
| | - Hedy Kindler
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alan Venook
- University of California at San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cary P Gross
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Iveson TJ, Sobrero AF, Yoshino T, Souglakos I, Ou FS, Meyers JP, Shi Q, Grothey A, Saunders MP, Labianca R, Yamanaka T, Boukovinas I, Hollander NH, Galli F, Yamazaki K, Georgoulias V, Kerr R, Oki E, Lonardi S, Harkin A, Rosati G, Paul J. Duration of Adjuvant Doublet Chemotherapy (3 or 6 months) in Patients With High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:631-641. [PMID: 33439695 PMCID: PMC8078416 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As oxaliplatin results in cumulative neurotoxicity, reducing treatment duration without loss of efficacy would benefit patients and healthcare providers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Four of the six studies in the International Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) collaboration included patients with high-risk stage II colon and rectal cancers. Patients were treated (clinician and/or patient choice) with either fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and randomly assigned to receive 3- or 6-month treatment. The primary end point is disease-free survival (DFS), and noninferiority of 3-month treatment was defined as a hazard ratio (HR) of < 1.2- v 6-month arm. To detect this with 80% power at a one-sided type one error rate of 0.10, a total of 542 DFS events were required. RESULTS 3,273 eligible patients were randomly assigned to either 3- or 6-month treatment with 62% receiving CAPOX and 38% FOLFOX. There were 553 DFS events. Five-year DFS was 80.7% and 83.9% for 3-month and 6-month treatment, respectively (HR, 1.17; 80% CI, 1.05 to 1.31; P [for noninferiority] .39). This crossed the noninferiority limit of 1.2. As in the IDEA stage III analysis, the duration effect appeared dependent on the chemotherapy regimen although a test of interaction was negative. HR for CAPOX was 1.02 (80% CI, 0.88 to 1.17), and HR for FOLFOX was 1.41 (80% CI, 1.18 to 1.68). CONCLUSION Although noninferiority has not been demonstrated in the overall population, the convenience, reduced toxicity, and cost of 3-month adjuvant CAPOX suggest it as a potential option for high-risk stage II colon cancer if oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is suitable. The relative contribution of the factors used to define high-risk stage II disease needs better understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ioannis Souglakos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Iraklio, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Axel Grothey
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Germantown, TN
| | | | - Roberto Labianca
- Cancer Center, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Takeharu Yamanaka
- Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | | | - Fabio Galli
- IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Rachel Kerr
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Eiji Oki
- Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrea Harkin
- University of Glasgow, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | | | - James Paul
- University of Glasgow, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jatoi A, Ou FS, Ahn DH, Zemla TJ, Le-Rademacher JG, Boland P, Ciombor KK, Jacobs NL, Pasche B, Cleary JM, McCune JS, Pedersen KS, Barzi A, Chiorean EG, Heying EN, Lenz HJ, Sloan JA, Grothey A, Lacouture ME, Bekaii-Saab T. Preemptive Versus Reactive Topical Clobetasol for Regorafenib-Induced Hand-Foot Reactions: A Preplanned Analysis of the ReDOS Trial. Oncologist 2021; 26:610-618. [PMID: 33604969 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is the most common regorafenib-induced adverse event and is in need of effective prevention and palliation. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Regorafenib Dose Optimization Study (ReDOS), a four-arm, previously published trial with a 1:1:1:1 randomization scheme, was analyzed in a manner in keeping with the original protocol to assess whether clobetasol 0.05% cream (a corticosteroid) applied to the palms and soles twice per day for 8 weeks was more effective when prescribed preemptively (before the development of HFSR) versus reactively (after the development of HFSR). Patients were assessed during the first two cycles of regorafenib. RESULTS Sixty-one patients received preemptive clobetasol, and 55 received reactive clobetasol. Groups were balanced on demographics. Over the first two cycles, no evidence of HFSR occurred in 30% with preemptive clobetasol versus 13% with reactive clobetasol (p = .03). During the first cycle, 54% and 45% of patients had no HFSR with preemptive and reactive clobetasol, respectively (p = .35). During the second cycle, 33% and 15% had no HFSR with preemptive and reactive clobetasol, respectively (p = .02). During the second cycle, rates of grade 1, 2, and 3 HFSR were 30%, 8%, and 3%, respectively, with preemptive clobetasol and 43%, 18%, and 7%, respectively, with reactive clobetasol (p = .12). Patient-reported outcomes showed HFSR compromised nearly all activities of daily living with worse quality of life in patients who received reactive versus preemptive clobetasol. No clobetasol-induced adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION Preemptive clobetasol might lessen regorafenib-induced hand-foot reactions compared with reactive therapy. Further confirmatory studies are needed in a larger patient cohort. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Regorafenib causes hand-foot skin reactions. Preemptive clobetasol, a high-potency topical corticosteroid, appears to lessen the severity of this adverse event. Although further study is needed, the favorable adverse event profile of this intervention might prompt clinicians to discuss this option with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nisha L Jacobs
- Minnesota Hematology Oncology, Coon Rapids, Minnesota, USA
| | - Boris Pasche
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - James M Cleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Strickler JH, Ou FS, Bekaii-Saab TS, Parseghian CM, Cercek A, Ng K, Sanchez FA, Bruggeman S, Larson JJ, Finley GG, Hubbard JM, Wu C, Lenz HJ, Kopetz S, Corcoran RB. PULSE: A randomized phase II open label study of panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy after progression on anti-EGFR therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.tps143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS143 Background: Patients with KRAS and NRAS ( RAS) wild-type mCRC benefit from the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (Abs) panitumumab and cetuximab, but nearly all patients experience resistance. Blood-based profiling of cell free DNA (cfDNA) can identify genomic alterations that drive acquired EGFR Ab resistance. After discontinuation of anti-EGFR Abs, acquired genomic alterations decay over time to undetectable levels. Some studies have suggested clinical benefit from EGFR Ab rechallenge, but there is limited evidence that EGFR Ab rechallenge improves survival compared to standard of care (SOC) therapies. We hypothesize that cfDNA profiling will identify patients appropriate for panitumumab rechallenge, and that these molecularly selected patients will have improved survival compared to current SOC therapies. Methods: This is a randomized phase II, open label study designed to compare the overall survival (OS) of panitumumab rechallenge versus SOC (investigator choice TAS-102 or regorafenib). Secondary objectives include comparisons of progression free survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and quality of life as measured by the linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) questionnaire. Eligible patients have radiographically measurable KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF codon 600 wild-type mCRC based on tumor tissue testing, and must have experienced progression or intolerance to treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, an anti-VEGF Ab, and an anti-PD-1 Ab if the tumor has mismatch repair deficiency or is MSI-H. Progression after at least 4 months treatment with an anti-EGFR Ab is required. All patients must be enrolled in the COLOMATE cfDNA screening protocol (NCT03765736) and meet molecular eligibility based on Guardant360 cfDNA profiling (absence of amplification of ERBB2, KRAS, NRAS, and MET; absence of mutations of BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, NRAS, and MET [mutant allele frequency > 0.5%]). Greater than 90 days must have elapsed between the most recent treatment with an anti-EGFR Ab and cfDNA profiling. Dosing for all study drugs is according to clinical SOC. 120 patients will be randomized 1:1 to panitumumab rechallenge or SOC. With 83 OS events, this study will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 6.5 to 10 months (HR=0.65; 1-sided α= 0.15). This study began enrollment in 6/2020. Recruitment is ongoing at 16 sites in the Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) network (ACCRU-GI-1623). Clinical trial information: NCT03992456.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Cercek
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott Kopetz
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Francini E, Ou FS, Lazzi S, Petrioli R, Multari AG, Pesola G, Messuti L, Colombo E, Livellara V, Bazzurri S, Cherri S, Miano ST, Wolfe EG, Alberts SR, Hubbard JM, Yoon HH, Francini G. The prognostic value of CD3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for stage II colon cancer according to use of adjuvant chemotherapy: A large single-institution cohort study. Transl Oncol 2020; 14:100973. [PMID: 33338878 PMCID: PMC7750416 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Low CD3+ TILs rate was associated with shorter OS in those with stage II colon cancer who did not receive adjuvant therapy. CD3+ TILs rate was not prognostic for patients with stage II colon cancer who had adjuvant therapy. Low CD3+ TILs rate may be an additional risk factor for stage II colon cancer patients who did not have adjuvant therapy yet.
Background High tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) density was previously shown to be associated with favorable prognosis for patients with colon cancer (CC). However, the impact of TILs on overall survival (OS) of stage II CC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) or not (no-ADJ) is unknown. We assessed the prognostic value of CD3+ TILs in stage II CC patients according to whether they had ADJ or not. Methods Patients treated with curative surgery for stage II CC (2002–2013) were selected from the Santa Maria alle Scotte Hospital registry. TILs at the invasive front, center of tumor, and stroma were determined by immunohistochemistry and manually quantified as the rate of TILs/total tissue areas. High TILs (H-TILs) was defined as >20%. Patients were categorized as high or low TILs (L-TILs) and ADJ or no-ADJ. Results Of the 678 patients included, 137 (20%) received ADJ and 541 (80%) did not. The distribution of the 4 groups were: 16% (L-TIL/ADJ), 64% (L-TIL/no-ADJ), 5% (H-TIL/ADJ), 15% (H-TIL/no-ADJ). Compared to H-TILs/no-ADJ, ADJ patients showed a significantly increased OS (P<.01) regardless of the TILs rate whereas L-TILs/no-ADJ had significantly decreased OS and higher risk of death (HR=1.41; 95% CI, 1.06–1.88; P<.0001). On multivariable analysis, the unfavorable prognostic value of L-TILs (vs. H-TILs) for no-ADJ patients was confirmed (HR=1.36; 95% CI 1.02, 1.82; P=.0373). Conclusion Low CD3+ TILs rate was associated with shorter OS in those with stage II colon cancer who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Low CD3+ TILs could be considered an additional risk factor for still ADJ-untreated stage II CC patients, which could facilitate clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Francini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy.
| | | | - Stefano Lazzi
- Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sara Cherri
- Santa Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Guido Francini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dasari A, Morris VK, Allegra CJ, Atreya C, Benson AB, Boland P, Chung K, Copur MS, Corcoran RB, Deming DA, Dwyer A, Diehn M, Eng C, George TJ, Gollub MJ, Goodwin RA, Hamilton SR, Hechtman JF, Hochster H, Hong TS, Innocenti F, Iqbal A, Jacobs SA, Kennecke HF, Lee JJ, Lieu CH, Lenz HJ, Lindwasser OW, Montagut C, Odisio B, Ou FS, Porter L, Raghav K, Schrag D, Scott AJ, Shi Q, Strickler JH, Venook A, Yaeger R, Yothers G, You YN, Zell JA, Kopetz S. ctDNA applications and integration in colorectal cancer: an NCI Colon and Rectal-Anal Task Forces whitepaper. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020; 17:757-770. [PMID: 32632268 PMCID: PMC7790747 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0392-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
An increasing number of studies are describing potential uses of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the care of patients with colorectal cancer. Owing to this rapidly developing area of research, the Colon and Rectal-Anal Task Forces of the United States National Cancer Institute convened a panel of multidisciplinary experts to summarize current data on the utility of ctDNA in the management of colorectal cancer and to provide guidance in promoting the efficient development and integration of this technology into clinical care. The panel focused on four key areas in which ctDNA has the potential to change clinical practice, including the detection of minimal residual disease, the management of patients with rectal cancer, monitoring responses to therapy, and tracking clonal dynamics in response to targeted therapies and other systemic treatments. The panel also provides general guidelines with relevance for ctDNA-related research efforts, irrespective of indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind Dasari
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Van K Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Chloe Atreya
- University of California at San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Al B Benson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Patrick Boland
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ki Chung
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mehmet S Copur
- CHI Health St Francis Cancer Treatment Center, Grand Island, NE, USA
| | - Ryan B Corcoran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dustin A Deming
- Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Andrea Dwyer
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas J George
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Stanley R Hamilton
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaclyn F Hechtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Howard Hochster
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MD, USA
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Center for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Atif Iqbal
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Division of Surgery, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samuel A Jacobs
- National Adjuvant Surgical and Bowel Project Foundation/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hagen F Kennecke
- Department of Oncology, Virginia Mason Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - James J Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Christopher H Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - O Wolf Lindwasser
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Clara Montagut
- Hospital del Mar-Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bruno Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laura Porter
- Patient Advocate, NCI Colon Task Force, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Division of Population Sciences, Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aaron J Scott
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Banner University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Qian Shi
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John H Strickler
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alan Venook
- University of California at San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Greg Yothers
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason A Zell
- Department of Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mackintosh C, Yuan C, Ou FS, Zhang S, Niedzwiecki D, Chang IW, O'Neil BH, Mullen BC, Lenz HJ, Blanke CD, Venook AP, Mayer RJ, Fuchs CS, Innocenti F, Nixon AB, Goldberg RM, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K. Association of Coffee Intake With Survival in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:1713-1721. [PMID: 32940631 PMCID: PMC7499248 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Importance Several compounds found in coffee possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and insulin-sensitizing effects, which may contribute to anticancer activity. Epidemiological studies have identified associations between increased coffee consumption and decreased recurrence and mortality of colorectal cancer. The association between coffee consumption and survival in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer is unknown. Objective To evaluate the association of coffee consumption with disease progression and death in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective observational cohort study included 1171 patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405, a completed phase 3 clinical trial comparing the addition of cetuximab and/or bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy. Patients reported dietary intake using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire at the time of enrollment. Data were collected from October 27, 2005, to January 18, 2018, and analyzed from May 1 to August 31, 2018. Exposures Consumption of total, decaffeinated, and caffeinated coffee measured in cups per day. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Among the 1171 patients included in the analysis (694 men [59%]; median age, 59 [interquartile range, 51-67] years). The median follow-up time among living patients was 5.4 years (10th percentile, 1.3 years; IQR, 3.2-6.3 years). A total of 1092 patients (93%) had died or had disease progression. Increased consumption of coffee was associated with decreased risk of cancer progression (hazard ratio [HR] for 1-cup/d increment, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-1.00; P = .04 for trend) and death (HR for 1-cup/d increment, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98; P = .004 for trend). Participants who consumed 2 to 3 cups of coffee per day had a multivariable HR for OS of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67-1.00) and for PFS of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68-0.99), compared with those who did not drink coffee. Participants who consumed at least 4 cups of coffee per day had a multivariable HR for OS of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.46-0.87) and for PFS of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.59-1.05). Significant associations were noted for both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee. Conclusions and Relevance Coffee consumption may be associated with reduced risk of disease progression and death in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Further research is warranted to elucidate underlying biological mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - I-Wen Chang
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Brian C Mullen
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office/Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Andrew B Nixon
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Van Blarigan EL, Zhang S, Ou FS, Venlo A, Ng K, Atreya C, Van Loon K, Niedzwiecki D, Giovannucci E, Wolfe EG, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, O'Neil BH, Shaw JE, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O'Reilly EM, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Association of Diet Quality With Survival Among People With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Cancer and Leukemia B and Southwest Oncology Group 80405 Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2023500. [PMID: 33125497 PMCID: PMC7599454 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Diet has been associated with survival in patients with stage I to III colorectal cancer, but data on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are limited. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between diet quality and overall survival among individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a prospective cohort study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance) and Southwest Oncology Group 80405 trial between October 27, 2005, and February 29, 2012, and followed up through January 2018. EXPOSURES Participants completed a validated food frequency questionnaire within 4 weeks after initiation of first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Diets were categorized according to the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED) score, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score, and Western and prudent dietary patterns derived using principal component analysis. Participants were categorized into sex-specific quintiles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for overall survival. RESULTS In this cohort study of 1284 individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer, the median age was 59 (interquartile range [IQR]: 51-68) years, median body mass index was 27.2 (IQR, 24.1-31.4), 521 (41%) were female, and 1102 (86%) were White. There were 1100 deaths during a median follow-up of 73 months (IQR, 64-87 months). We observed an inverse association between the AMED score and risk of death (HR quintile 5 vs quintile 1, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.04; P = .04 for trend), but the point estimates were not statistically significant. None of the other diet scores or patterns were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this prospective analysis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, diet quality assessed at initiation of first-line treatment for metastatic disease was not associated with overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Van Blarigan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Sui Zhang
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Alan Venlo
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chloe Atreya
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Nutrition and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric G Wolfe
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy; Department of Medicine-Hematology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | | | - Blase N Polite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Howard S Hochster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | | | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Innocenti F, Sibley AB, Patil SA, Etheridge AS, Jiang C, Ou FS, Howell SD, Plummer SJ, Casey G, Bertagnolli MM, McLeod HL, Auman JT, Blanke CD, Furukawa Y, Venook AP, Kubo M, Lenz HJ, Parker JS, Ratain MJ, Owzar K. Genomic Analysis of Germline Variation Associated with Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy Plus Biologics in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:267-275. [PMID: 32958699 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (5-FU; FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU (FOLFOX), combined with bevacizumab or cetuximab, are approved, first-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed at identifying germline variants associated with survival in patients with mCRC treated with these regimens in Cancer and Leukemia Group B/SWOG 80405. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with mCRC receiving either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI were randomized to either cetuximab or bevacizumab. DNA from peripheral blood was genotyped for approximately 700,000 SNPs. The association between SNPs and overall survival (OS) was tested in 613 patients of genetically estimated European ancestry using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS The four most significant SNPs associated with OS were three haplotypic SNPs between microsomal glutathione S-transferase 1 (MGST1) and LIM domain only 3 (LMO3, representative HR, 1.56; P = 1.30 × 10-6), and rs11644916 in AXIN1 (HR, 1.39, P = 4.26 × 10-6). AXIN1 is a well-established tumor suppressor gene in colorectal cancer, and rs11644916 (G>A) conferred shorter OS. Median OS for patients with the AA, AG, or GG genotypes was 18.4, 25.6, or 36.4 months, respectively. In 90 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), rs11649255 in AXIN1 [in almost complete linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs11644916], was associated with shorter OS (HR, 2.24, P = 0.0096). Using rs11648673 in AXIN1 (in very high LD with rs11644916 and with functional evidence), luciferase activity in three colorectal cancer cell lines was reduced. CONCLUSIONS This is the first large genome-wide association study ever conducted in patients with mCRC treated with first-line standard treatment in a randomized phase III trial. A common SNP in AXIN1 conferred worse OS and the effect was replicated in TCGA. Further studies in colorectal cancer experimental models are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Innocenti
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | | | - Sushant A Patil
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Amy S Etheridge
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Chen Jiang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Stefanie D Howell
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Sarah J Plummer
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Graham Casey
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Monica M Bertagnolli
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Howard L McLeod
- Taneja College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - James T Auman
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Charles D Blanke
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Yoichi Furukawa
- Division of Clinical Genome Research, Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Michiaki Kubo
- Laboratory for Genotyping Development, Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, RIKEN, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joel S Parker
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Mark J Ratain
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kouros Owzar
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Guercio BJ, Zhang S, Ou FS, Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, Pollak MN, Nixon AB, Mullen BC, O'Neil BH, Shaw JE, Polite BN, Benson AB, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Brown JC, O'Reilly EM, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. IGF-Binding Proteins, Adiponectin, and Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 5:pkaa074. [PMID: 33426464 PMCID: PMC7785047 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Energy balance-related biomarkers are associated with risk and prognosis of various malignancies. Their relationship to survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) requires further study. Methods Baseline plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3, IGFBP-7, C-peptide, and adiponectin were measured at time of trial registration in a prospective cohort of patients with mCRC participating in a National Cancer Institute–sponsored trial of first-line systemic therapy. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to adjust for confounders and examine associations of each biomarker with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). P values are 2-sided. Results Median follow-up for 1086 patients was 6.2 years. Compared with patients in the lowest IGFBP-3 quintile, patients in the highest IGFBP-3 quintile experienced an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for OS of 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42 to 0.78; Pnonlinearity < .001) and for PFS of 0.61 (95% CI = 0.45 to 0.82; Ptrend = .003). Compared with patients in the lowest IGFBP-7 quintile, patients in the highest IGFBP-7 quintile experienced an adjusted hazard ratio for OS of 1.60 (95% CI = 1.30 to 1.97; Ptrend < .001) and for PFS of 1.38 (95% CI = 1.13 to 1.69; Ptrend < .001). Plasma C-peptide and IGF-1 were not associated with patient outcomes. Adiponectin was not associated with OS; there was a nonlinear U-shaped association between adiponectin and PFS (Pnonlinearity = .03). Conclusions Among patients with mCRC, high plasma IGFBP-3 and low IGFBP-7 were associated with longer OS and PFS. Extreme levels of adiponectin were associated with shorter PFS. These findings suggest potential avenues for prognostic and therapeutic innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan J Guercio
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Michael N Pollak
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Andrew B Nixon
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brian C Mullen
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - James E Shaw
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Blase N Polite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Al Bowen Benson
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium, National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Justin C Brown
- Department of Population and Public Health, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Network and Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|