Patient HLA Germline Variation and Transplant Survivorship

HLA Haplotypes and Relapse After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

PURPOSE

Recurrence of blood malignancy is the major cause of hematopoietic cell transplant failure. HLA class II molecules play a fundamental role in antitumor responses but the role of class II haplotypes is not known.

METHODS

HLA-DR, -DQ, -DM, and -DO allele variation was determined in 1,629 related haploidentical transplants to study the clinical significance of individual molecules and haplotypes.

RESULTS

Outcome correlated with patient and donor variation for HLA-DRβ residue 86 (Gly/Val), HLA-DQ (G1/G2) heterodimers, and donor HLA-DM (DM11,11/nonDM11,11) molecules, and depended on patient-donor mismatching. Risks of relapse were lower for DRβ-86 GlyGly patients when the donor was GlyVal (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.68]; P < .001); GlyVal patients benefited from HLA-DRB1-matched donors, whereas no donor was superior to another for ValVal patients. G1G2 patients with G1G2-mismatched donors had lower relapse. Transplantation from donors with DMα residue 184 ArgHis was associated with higher risk of relapse (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.09 to 2.36]; P = .02) relative to ArgArg. Relapse and mortality risks differed across HLA-DR-DQ-DM haplotypes.

CONCLUSION

HLA class II haplotypes may be functional constituents of the transplantation barrier, and their consideration in patients and donors may improve the success of transplantation.

Younger Matched Unrelated Donors Confer Decreased Relapse Risk Compared to Older Sibling Donors in Older Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) offers cure for older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), disease relapse remains a major issue. Whether matched sibling donors (MSDs) are still the preferred donor choice compared to younger matched unrelated donors (MUDs) in the contemporary era of improved transplantation practices remains unknown. This retrospective cohort registry study queried the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database in patients with B cell ALL (B-ALL) age ≥ 50 years undergoing alloHCT from older MSDs (age ≥ 50 years) or younger MUDs (age ≤ 35 years) between 2011 and 2018. The study included common allograft types, conditioning regimens, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategies. The primary outcome was relapse risk, and secondary outcomes included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), GVHD, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS). Among 925 eligible patients in the study cohort, 386 underwent alloHCT with an older MSD (median donor age, 58 years) and 539 underwent alloHCT from a younger MUD (median donor age, 25 year). In multivariable analysis, younger MUDs conferred a significantly decreased risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], .68; P = .002) compared with older MSDs. The adjusted cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was significantly lower with younger MUDs than with older MSDs (26% versus 37%; P = .001). Younger MUDs were associated with a greater risk of chronic GVHD compared to older MSDs (HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10 to 1.61; P = .003). Compared to older MSDs, younger MUDs conferred an increased NRM (HR, 1.38; P = .02) and higher adjusted cumulative incidence of NRM at 5 years (31% versus 22%; P = .006). There were no differences in post-alloHCT OS or LFS rates between younger MUDs and older MSDs (OS: HR, 1.09; [P = .37]; LFS: HR, .95 [P = .57]). The use of younger MUDs could be considered as a possible way to prevent relapse after alloHCT in older adults with ALL. Combining the use of younger MUDs with improved strategies to reduce GVHD merits further exploration to improve outcomes.

Impact of Donor Age on Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) provides cure for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, disease relapse remains a major concern. Based on recent data suggesting that younger donor age confers the greatest benefit for alloHCT with matched unrelated donors (MUDs), we attempted to answer a practical question: which donor type provides the best outcomes when an older patient with AML has a matched sibling donor (MSD, also older) versus the best MUD? This retrospective cohort registry study accessed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) in patients with AML age ≥ 50 years undergoing alloHCT from older MSDs (age ≥ 50 years) or younger MUDs (age ≤ 35 years) between 2011 and 2018. The study included common allograft types, conditioning regimens, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The primary outcome was relapse risk. Secondary outcomes included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), GVHD, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival. Among 4684 eligible patients, 1736 underwent alloHCT with an older MSD (median donor age, 60 years), and 2948 underwent alloHCT from a younger MUD (median donor age, 25 years). In multivariable analysis, compared to older MSDs, the use of younger MUDs conferred a decreased relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR], .86; P = .005) and a significantly lower adjusted 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (35% versus 41%; P = .003), but was associated with an increased risk for chronic GVHD (HR, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 1.29; P = .0002) and greater NRM only in the earlier period of 2011 to 2015 (HR, 1.24; P = .016). The corresponding NRM rates were significantly lower in the more recent period of 2016 to 2018 (HR, .78; P = .017). The adjusted 5-year DFS probability was 44% (95% CI, 42% to 46%) with an alloHCT from younger MUDs compared to 41% (95% CI, 38% to 43%) with older MSDs (P = .04). In summary, for older patients with AML undergoing alloHCT, the use of younger MUDs is associated with decreased relapse risk and improved DFS compared with the use of older MSDs.

Role of NKG2D ligands and receptor in haploidentical related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation

The recurrence of malignancy after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the primary cause of transplantation failure. The NKG2D axis is a powerful pathway for antitumor responses, but its role in the control of malignancy after HCT is not well-defined. We tested the hypothesis that gene variation of the NKG2D receptor and its ligands MICA and MICB affect relapse and survival in 1629 patients who received a haploidentical HCT for the treatment of a malignant blood disorder. Patients and donors were characterized for MICA residue 129, the exon 5 short tandem repeat (STR), and MICB residues 52, 57, 98, and 189. Donors were additionally defined for the presence of NKG2D residue 72. Mortality was higher in patients with MICB-52Asn relative to those with 52Asp (hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.71; P = .002) and lower in those with MICA-STR mismatch than in those with STR match (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; P = .00002). Relapse was lower with NKG2D-72Thr donors than with 72Ala donors (relapse HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.91; P = .02). The protective effects of patient MICB-52Asp with donor MICA-STR mismatch and NKG2D-72Thr were enhanced when all 3 features were present. The NKG2D ligand/receptor pathway is a transplantation determinant. The immunobiology of relapse is defined by the concerted effects of MICA, MICB, and NKG2D germ line variation. Consideration of NKG2D ligand/receptor pairings may improve survival for future patients.

HLA Amino Acid Mismatch-Based Risk Stratification of Kidney Allograft Failure Using a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm

OBJECTIVE

While associations between HLA antigen-level mismatches (Ag-MM) and kidney allograft failure are well established, HLA amino acid-level mismatches (AA-MM) have been less explored. Ag-MM fails to consider the substantial variability in the number of MMs at polymorphic amino acid (AA) sites within any given Ag-MM category, which may conceal variable impact on allorecognition. In this study we aim to develop a novel Feature Inclusion Bin Evolver for Risk Stratification (FIBERS) and apply it to automatically discover bins of HLA amino acid mismatches that stratify donor-recipient pairs into low versus high graft survival risk groups.

METHODS

Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we applied FIBERS on a multiethnic population of 166,574 kidney transplants between 2000-2017. FIBERS was applied (1) across all HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 locus AA-MMs with comparison to 0-ABDR Ag-MM risk stratification, (2) on AA-MMs within each HLA locus individually, and (3) using cross validation to evaluate FIBERS generalizability. The predictive power of graft failure risk stratification was evaluated while adjusting for donor/recipient characteristics and HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 Ag-MMs as covariates.

RESULTS

FIBERS's best-performing bin (on AA-MMs across all loci) added significant predictive power (hazard ratio = 1.10, Bonferroni adj. p < 0.001) in stratifying graft failure risk (where low-risk is defined as zero AA-MMs and high-risk is one or more AA-MMs) even after adjusting for Ag-MMs and donor/recipient covariates. The best bin also categorized more than twice as many patients to the low-risk category, compared to traditional 0-ABDR Ag mismatching (∼24.4% vs ∼9.1%). When HLA loci were binned individually, the bin for DRB1 exhibited the strongest risk stratification; relative to zero AA-MM, one or more MMs in the bin yielded HR = 1.11, p < 0.005 in a fully adjusted Cox model. AA-MMs at HLA-DRB1 peptide contact sites contributed most to incremental risk of graft failure. Additionally, FIBERS points to possible risk associated with HLA-DQB1 AA-MMs at positions that determine specificity of peptide anchor residues and HLA-DQ heterodimer stability.

CONCLUSION

FIBERS's performance suggests potential for discovery of HLA immunogenetics-based risk stratification of kidney graft failure that outperforms traditional assessment.

Race and Survival in Unrelated Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation depends on race/ethnicity and histocompatibility (HLA) between the patient and transplant donor. HLA sequence variation is a genetic construct of continental populations, but its role in accounting for racial disparities of transplant outcome is unknown. To determine disparities in transplant survivorship among patients of diverse race while accounting for patient and donor HLA variation. A total of 26,945 self-described Japanese, U.S. Asian, White, Hispanic, and Black patients received an unrelated donor transplant for the treatment of a life-threatening blood disorder. The risk of mortality with and without adjustment for known HLA risk factors (number and location of donor mismatches; patient HLA-B leader genotype and HLA-DRβ peptide-binding motif) was studied using multivariable models. Survival after HLA-matched transplantation for patients with optimal leader and peptide-binding features was estimated for each race, as was the improvement in survival over calendar-year time by considering year of transplantation as a continuous linear variable. The number, location, and nature of donor HLA mismatches and the frequency of patient HLA-B and HLA-DRB1 sequence motifs differed by race. Japanese patients had superior survival compared to other races without consideration of HLA. After HLA adjustment, three mortality risk strata were identified: Japanese and U.S. Asian (low-risk); White and Hispanic (intermediate-risk), and Black patients (high-risk). Survival for patients with optimal donor and HLA characteristics was superior for Japanese, intermediate for U.S. Asian, White, and Hispanic, and lowest for Black patients. Five-year increments of transplant year were associated with greater decreases in mortality hazards for Black and Hispanic patients than for Japanese, U.S. Asian and White patients. Transplant survivorship disparities are influenced by HLA as a genetic construct of race. A more complete understanding of the factors that influence transplant outcomes provides opportunities to narrow disparities for future patients.

Next-generation sequencing and clinical histocompatibility testing

Histocompatibility testing is essential for donor identification and risk assessment in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Additionally, it is useful for identifying donor specific alleles for monitoring donor specific antibodies in post-transplant patients. Next-generation sequence (NGS) based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing has improved many aspects of histocompatibility testing in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant. HLA disease association testing and research has also benefited from the advent of NGS technologies. In this review we discuss the current impact and future applications of NGS typing on clinical histocompatibility testing for transplant and non-transplant purposes.

BSHI guideline: HLA matching and donor selection for haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation

A review of the British Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (BSHI) Guideline 'HLA matching and donor selection for haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation' published in 2016 was undertaken by a BSHI appointed writing committee. Literature searches were performed and the data extracted were presented as recommendations according to the GRADE nomenclature.

The MHC in the era of next-generation sequencing: Implications for bridging structure with function

The MHC continues to have the most disease-associations compared to other regions of the human genome, even in the genome-wide association study (GWAS) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) era. Analysis of non-coding variation and their impact on the level of expression of HLA allotypes has shed new light on the potential mechanisms underlying HLA disease associations and alloreactivity in transplantation. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has the capability of delineating the phase of variants in the HLA antigen-recognition site (ARS) with non-coding regulatory polymorphisms. These relationships are critical for understanding the qualitative and quantitative implications of HLA gene diversity. This article summarizes current understanding of non-coding region variation of HLA loci, the consequences of regulatory variation on HLA expression, the role for evolution in shaping lineage-specific expression, and the impact of HLA expression on disease susceptibility and transplantation outcomes. A role for phased sequencing methods for the MHC, and perspectives for future directions in basic and applied immunogenetic studies of the MHC are presented.