Upregulation of HLA-II related to LAG-3+CD4+ T cell infiltration is associated with patient outcome in human glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant diffuse glioma of the brain. Although immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as programmed cell death protein (PD)-1/PD ligand-1 inhibitors, has revolutionized the treatment of several cancers, the clinical benefit in GBM patients has been limited. Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) binding to human leukocyte antigen-II (HLA-II) plays an essential role in triggering CD4+ T cell exhaustion and could interfere with the efficiency of anti-PD-1 treatment; however, the value of LAG-3-HLA-II interactions in ICI immunotherapy for GBM patients has not yet been analyzed. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the expression and regulation of HLA-II in human GBM samples and the correlation with LAG-3+CD4+ T cell infiltration. Human leukocyte antigen-II was highly expressed in GBM and correlated with increased LAG-3+CD4+ T cell infiltration in the stroma. Additionally, HLA-IIHighLAG-3High was associated with worse patient survival. Increased interleukin-10 (IL-10) expression was observed in GBM, which was correlated with high levels of HLA-II and LAG-3+ T cell infiltration in stroma. HLA-IIHighIL-10High GBM associated with LAG-3+ T cells infiltration synergistically showed shorter overall survival in patients. Combined anti-LAG-3 and anti-IL-10 treatment inhibited tumor growth in a mouse brain GL261 tumor model. In vitro, CD68+ macrophages upregulated HLA-II expression in GBM cells through tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Blocking TNF-α-dependent inflammation inhibited tumor growth in a mouse GBM model. In summary, T cell-tumor cell interactions, such as LAG-3-HLA-II, could confer an immunosuppressive environment in human GBM, leading to poor prognosis in patients. Therefore, targeting the LAG-3-HLA-II interaction could be beneficial in ICI immunotherapy to improve the clinical outcome of GBM patients.

Promising immunotherapy targets: TIM3, LAG3, and TIGIT joined the party

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown great promise as immunotherapy for restoring T cell function and reactivating anti-tumor immunity. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first immune checkpoint inhibitor, ipilimumab, in 2011 for advanced melanoma patients, leading to significant improvements in survival rates. Subsequently, other immune checkpoint-targeting antibodies were tested. Currently, seven ICIs, namely ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA4]), pembrolizumab, nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1]), atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, and cemiplimab (anti-PD-L1), have been approved for various cancer types. However, the efficacy of antibodies targeting CTLA4 or PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) remains suboptimal. Consequently, ongoing studies are evaluating the next generation of ICIs, such as lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG3), T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing 3 (TIM3), and T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT). Our review provides a summary of clinical trials evaluating these novel immune checkpoints in cancer treatment.

Paclitaxel plus Eftilagimod Alpha, a Soluble LAG-3 Protein, in Metastatic, HR+ Breast Cancer: Results from AIPAC, a Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase IIb Trial

PURPOSE

Eftilagimod alpha (efti), a soluble lymphocyte activation gene (LAG-3) protein and MHC class II agonist, enhances innate and adaptive immunity. Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel (AIPAC) evaluated safety and efficacy of efti plus paclitaxel in patients with predominantly endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (ET-resistant HR+ HER2- MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with HR+ HER2- MBC were randomized 1:1 to weekly intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and subcutaneous efti (30 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks for six 4-week cycles, then monthly subcutaneous efti (30 mg) or placebo maintenance. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and quality of life. Exploratory endpoints included cellular biomarkers.

RESULTS

114 patients received efti and 112 patients received placebo. Median age was 60 years (91.6% visceral disease, 84.1% ET-resistant, 44.2% with previous CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment). Median PFS at 7.3 months was similar for efti and placebo. Median OS was not significantly improved for efti (20.4 vs. 17.5 months; HR, 0.88; P = 0.197) but became significant for predefined exploratory subgroups. EORTC QLQC30-B23 global health status was sustained for efti but deteriorated for placebo. Efti increased absolute lymphocyte, monocyte and secondary target cell (CD4, CD8) counts, plasma IFNγ and CXCL10 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary endpoint, PFS, was not met, AIPAC confirmed expected pharmacodynamic effects and demonstrated excellent safety profile for efti. OS was not significantly improved globally (2.9-month difference), but was significantly improved in exploratory biomarker subgroups, warranting further studies to clarify efti's role in patients with ET-resistant HER2- MBC.

Emerging treatment strategies for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer that is often associated with an aggressive phenotype and a poor prognosis. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for most patients with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC), but duration of response is often short and median overall survival is only 12–18 months. Therefore, it is critical to identify novel treatment strategies to improve outcomes for these patients. In this review article, we discuss recent advances in treatment strategies for patients with mTNBC including the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, and antibody–drug conjugates. For each topic, we summarize important preclinical and clinical data, discuss implications for clinical practice, and highlight future research directions.

Emerging immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of breast cancer

Immunotherapy has resulted in unprecedented gains in long-term outcomes for many cancer types and has revolutionized the treatment landscape of solid tumor oncology. Checkpoint inhibition in combination with chemotherapy has proven to be effective for the treatment of a subset of advanced triple-negative breast cancer in the first-line setting. This initial success is likely just the tip of the iceberg as there is much that remains unknown about how to best harness the immune system as a therapeutic strategy in all breast cancer subtypes. Therefore, numerous ongoing studies are currently underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy in breast cancer. In this review, we will discuss emerging immunotherapeutic strategies for breast cancer treatment including the following: (1) Intratumoral therapies, (2) Anti-tumor vaccines, (3) B-specific T-cell engagers, and (4) Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and (5) Emerging systemic immunotherapy strategies. For each topic, we will review the existing preclinical and clinical literature, discuss ongoing clinical trials, and highlight future directions in the field.

LAG3 and Its Ligands Show Increased Expression in High-Risk Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare ocular malignancy which originates in the uveal tract, and often gives rise to metastases. Potential targets for immune checkpoint inhibition are lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3) and its ligands. We set out to analyse the distribution of these molecules in UM. The expression of mRNA was determined using an Illumina array in 64 primary UM from Leiden. The T lymphocyte fraction was determined by digital droplet PCR. In a second cohort of 15 cases from Leiden, mRNA expression was studied by Fluidigm qPCR, while a third cohort consisted of 80 UM from TCGA. In the first Leiden cohort, LAG3 expression was associated with the presence of epithelioid cells (p = 0.002), monosomy of chromosome 3 (p = 0.004), and loss of BAP1 staining (p = 0.001). In this Leiden cohort as well as in the TCGA cohort, LAG3 expression correlated positively with the expression of its ligands: LSECtin, Galectin-3, and the HLA class II molecules HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DP (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, ligands Galectin-3 and HLA class II were increased in monosomy 3 tumours and the expression of LAG3 correlated with the presence of an inflammatory phenotype (T cell fraction, macrophages, HLA-A and HLA-B expression: all p < 0.001). High expression levels of LAG3 (p = 0.01), Galectin-3 (p = 0.001), HLA-DRA1 (p = 0.002), HLA-DQA1 (p = 0.04), HLA-DQB2 (p = 0.03), and HLA-DPA1 (p = 0.007) were associated with bad survival. We conclude that expression of the LAG ligands Galectin-3 and HLA class II strongly correlates with LAG3 expression and all are increased in UM with Monosomy 3/BAP1 loss. The distribution suggests a potential benefit of monoclonal antibodies against LAG3 or Galectin-3 as adjuvant treatment in patients with high-risk UM.

Next-Generation Immunotherapy Approaches in Melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For patients with metastatic melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibition has drastically changed outcomes. Here, we review the current and next generations of immune-based anti-cancer therapeutics for patients with metastatic melanoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

The need for new anti-cancer therapeutics in patients with metastatic melanoma who have progression of disease despite immune checkpoint blockade is evident. Several novel agents are expected to have FDA approval within the next few years, as they have yielded impressive responses. Despite these optimistic agents, the field of immuno-oncology continues to expand and produce agents with novel mechanisms of action. The next generation of immunotherapy is based upon years of thoroughly researched immuno-oncology. Many of these agents are currently being evaluated in early phase clinical trials, and much of the preliminary data looks promising.

Reinvigorating exhausted CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment and current strategies in cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer in recent years and achieved overall success and long-term clinical benefit in patients with a wide variety of cancer types. However, there is still a large proportion of patients exhibiting limited or no responses to immunotherapeutic strategy, some of which were even observed with hyperprogressive disease. One major obstacle restricting the efficacy is that tumor-reactive CD8⁺ T cells, which are central for tumor control, undergo exhaustion, and lose their ability to eliminate cancer cells after infiltrating into the strongly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Thus, as a potential therapeutic rationale in the development of cancer immunotherapy, targeting or reinvigorating exhausted CD8⁺ T cells has been attracting much interest. Hitherto, both intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms that govern CD8⁺ T-cell exhaustion have been explored. Specifically, the transcriptional and epigenetic landscapes have been depicted utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing or mass cytometry (CyTOF). In addition, cellular metabolism dictating the tumor-infiltrating CD8⁺ T-cell fate is currently under investigation. A series of clinical trials are being carried out to further establish the current strategies targeting CD8⁺ T-cell exhaustion. Taken together, despite the proven benefit of immunotherapy in cancer patients, additional efforts are still needed to fully circumvent limitations of exhausted T cells in the treatment. In this review, we will focus on the current cellular and molecular understanding of metabolic changes, epigenetic remodeling, and transcriptional regulation in CD8⁺ T-cell exhaustion and describe hypothetical treatment approaches based on immunotherapy aiming at reinvigorating exhausted CD8⁺ T cells.

Beyond PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibition: What the Future Holds for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy has altered the management of human malignancies, improving outcomes in an expanding list of diseases. Breast cancer - presumably due to its perceived low immunogenicity - is a late addition to this list. Furthermore, most of the focus has been on the triple negative subtype because of its higher tumor mutational load and lymphocyte-enriched stroma, although emerging data show promise on the other breast cancer subtypes as well. To this point the clinical use of immunotherapy is limited to the inhibition of two immune checkpoints, Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated Protein 4 (CTLA-4). Consistent with the complexity of the regulation of the tumor - host interactions and their lack of reliance on a single regulatory pathway, combinatory approaches have shown improved efficacy albeit at the cost of increased toxicity. Beyond those two checkpoints though, a large number of co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory molecules play major roles on tumor evasion from immunosurveillance. These molecules likely represent future targets of immunotherapy provided that the promise shown in early data is translated into improved patient survival in randomized trials. The biological role, prognostic and predictive implications regarding breast cancer and early clinical efforts on exploiting these immune-related therapeutic targets are herein reviewed.

AIPAC: a Phase IIb study of eftilagimod alpha (IMP321 or LAG-3Ig) added to weekly paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Eftilagimod alpha (IMP321), a soluble dimeric recombinant form of LAG-3, is a first-in-class antigen presenting cell activator under clinical development. By stimulating dendritic cells through MHC class II molecules, IMP321 was proven to induce sustained immune responses. Combining active immunotherapy with a standard cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen represents a promising novel strategy that might lead to therapeutic improvements in metastatic breast cancer. Here, we describe the rationale and design of AIPAC (NCT02614833), a double-blind, randomized, multicenter Phase IIb study evaluating IMP321 plus paclitaxel as a first-line chemotherapy compared with paclitaxel plus placebo in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. The primary end point is progression-free survival and key secondary objectives include overall survival, safety, quality of life and objective response rate.