Clinical Impact of High Throughput Sequencing on Liquid Biopsy in Advanced Solid Cancer

Background: Cancer therapies targeting actionable molecular alterations (AMA) have developed, but the clinical routine impact of high-throughput molecular profiling remains unclear. We present a monocentric experience of molecular profiling based on liquid biopsy in patients with cancer. Methods: Patients included had solid cancer and underwent cfDNA genomic profiling with FoudationOne Liquid CDx (F1LCDx) test, analyzing 324 genes. Primary endpoint was to describe patients with an AMA for whom clinical decisions were impacted by F1LCDx test results. Results: 191 patients were included, mostly with lung cancer (46%). An AMA was found in 52%. The most common molecular alterations were: TP53 (52%), KRAS (14%) and DNMT3 (11%). The most common AMA were: CHEK2 (10%), PIK3CA (9%), ATM (7%). There was no difference in progression-free survival (2.66 months vs. 3.81 months, p = 0.17), overall survival (5.3 months vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.64), or PFS2/PFS1 ratio ≥ 1.3 (20% vs. 24%, p = 0.72) between patients receiving a molecularly matched therapy (MMT) or a non-MMT, respectively. Patients with a MMT had an overall response rate of 19% and a disease control of 32%. Conclusions: Routine cfDNA molecular profiling is feasible and can lead to the access of targeted therapies. However, no notable benefit in patient’s outcomes was shown in this unselected pan-cancer study.

The Pros and Cons of Incorporating Transcriptomics in the Age of Precision Oncology

The treatment of cancer continues to evolve toward personalized therapies based on individual patient and tumor characteristics. Our successes and failures in adopting a precision-oncology approach have demonstrated the utmost importance in identifying the proper predictive biomarkers of response. Until recently, most biomarkers were identified using immunohistochemistry for protein expression or single-gene analysis to identify targetable alterations. With the rapid propagation of next-generation sequencing to evaluate tumor tissue and "liquid biopsies," identification of genomic biomarkers is now standard, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer, for which there is now an extensive catalog of biomarker-directed therapies with more anticipated to come. Despite these great strides, it has also become apparent that using genomic biomarkers alone will be insufficient, as it has been consistently shown that at least one-half of patients who undergo tumor genomic profiling have no actionable alteration. This is perhaps to be expected given the remarkable breadth of nongenetic factors that contribute to tumor initiation and progression. Some have proposed that the next logical step is to use transcriptome profiling to define new biomarkers of response to targeted agents. Recently, results from the WINTHER trial were published, specifically investigating the use of transcriptomics to improve match rates over genomic next-generation sequencing alone. In this review, we discuss the complexities of precision-oncology efforts and appraise the available evidence supporting the incorporation of transcriptomic data into the precision-oncology framework in the historical context of the development of biomarkers for directing cancer therapy.

Clinical actionability of molecular targets in endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer accounts for ~76,000 deaths among women each year worldwide. Disease mortality and the increasing number of new diagnoses make endometrial cancer an important consideration in women's health, particularly in industrialized countries, where the incidence of this tumour type is highest. Most endometrial cancers are carcinomas, with the remainder being sarcomas. Endometrial carcinomas can be classified into several histological subtypes, including endometrioid, serous and clear cell carcinomas. Histological subtyping is currently used routinely to guide prognosis and treatment decisions for endometrial cancer patients, while ongoing studies are evaluating the potential clinical utility of molecular subtyping. In this Review, we summarize the overarching molecular features of endometrial cancers and highlight recent studies assessing the potential clinical utility of specific molecular features for early detection, disease risk stratification and directing targeted therapies.

Everolimus-containing therapy vs conventional therapy in the treatment of refractory breast cancer patients with PI3K/AKT/mTOR mutations: A retrospective study

Background

Previous case reports have shown the promising antitumor activity of everolimus in solid tumors containing molecular aberrations in PI3K/ATK/mTOR pathway, however, whether it is effective in patients with breast cancer remains unknown. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective cohort study to compare the efficacy of molecularly matched targeted therapy with everolimus to conventional therapy in refractory breast cancer patients harboring PI3K/ATK/mTOR pathway activating mutations.

Methods

Refractory metastatic breast cancer patients who have received molecular screening using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) between September 8, 2015 and October 30, 2017 in two sites were screened for this study. The primary outcome was progression‐free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety profile.

Results

A total of 78 patients were screened for analysis, amongst all, 52 (66.7%) had at least one gene mutation in PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. The most common mutation fell in PIK3CA (76.9%, 40/52) with a mutational prevalence of 51.3%. Of the 32 patients who were eligible for efficacy analysis, patients in the everolimus group (n = 19) exhibited shorter PFS than those in the conventional group (n = 13) (median, 1.9 vs 6.1 months; HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.48‐8.81; P = .0005). ORR was 15.4% (2/13) in the everolimus group and 23.1% (3/13) in the conventional group (P = 1.000), and DCR was 30.8% (4/13) and 100% (13/13) for each group, respectively (P = .000). The incidence of grade 3‐5 adverse events was relatively higher in the conventional group (38.5%, 5/13) than that in the everolimus group (26.3%, 5/19).

Conclusions

Our findings suggested that everolimus might not be effective for cancer patients harboring mutations in PI3K/ATK/mTOR pathway and physicians should be cautious about its off‐label use in clinical practice.

Treatment According to Molecular Profiling in Relapsed/Refractory Cancer Patients: A Review Focusing on Latest Profiling Studies

In this review we aim to summarize studies investigating the impact of a molecular profiling (MP)-guided treatment approach in heavily pretreated cancer patients. In summary, many independent single- and multicenter studies showed a significant benefit of MP-guided treatment regarding response rates and survival. However, in the only randomized trial conducted so far, no benefit of MP-guided targeted therapy was observed. Notably, various profiling approaches were conducted in the respective studies: some studies used a single analytic approach (i.e. next-generation sequencing), others applied multiple analytic methods to perform comprehensive molecular profiling. It seems that multiplatform profiling analyses, detected an increased number of druggable molecular targets or signaling pathway alterations and that a higher proportion of patients was treated according to the molecular cancer profile. Even though no randomized study has shown a benefit of molecular profiling so far, many studies indicate that MP-guided treatment can be beneficial in patients with relapsed and/or refractory cancer. Currently ongoing large randomized trials (i.e. NCI-MATCH, TAPUR) will add evidence to the role of profiling-guided cancer treatment.