Multisystem Immune-Related Adverse Events from Dual-Agent Immunotherapy Use

BACKGROUND

little is known about the incidence and characteristics of multisystem immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with dual-agent ipilimumab and nivolumab use.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review was completed that included cancer patients seen at the Juravinski Cancer Centre who received at least one dose of ipilimumab and nivolumab from 2018 to 2022. Patient characteristics, cancer types, and irAEs were recorded. Multivariate logistic and cox regressions were completed, comparing those who developed multisystem irAEs, single irAE, and no irAE.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients were included in this study. Out of 123 patients, 72 (59%) had melanoma, 50/123 (41%) had renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and 1/123 (1%) had breast cancer. Multisystem irAEs were seen in 40% of the overall cohort. The most common irAE type was dermatitis (22%), followed by colitis (19%) and hepatitis (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that multisystem irAEs are prevalent amongst patients receiving ipilimumab and nivolumab. It is important for both physician education and the counseling and consent of patients to monitor the potential for multiple irAEs.

Retrospective analysis of hospital admissions due to immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events (irAE)

AIM

Hospital admissions secondary to immune-related adverse events (irAE) arising from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are likely to increase with increasing use of this class of drug. We sought to determine the characteristics and outcomes of hospital admissions due to irAE.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients treated with ICI at two tertiary hospitals in Queensland (Australia) was performed. Patients who received at least one dose of ICI for a nonhaematological malignancy between the 1st January 2016 and 1st January 2017 were included. All subsequent hospital admissions were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients were included, with the most common malignancies being non-small-cell-cell lung cancer (41%) and melanoma (18%), and most patients received anti-PD1 treatment (78%). A sum of 76 patients accounted for 116 admissions. Comparing admissions due to irAE and non-irAE, those admitted for irAE had a significantly longer duration on ICI prior to admission (173 vs 105 days, P = 0.04) but durations of admissions were similar (9.0 vs 8.5 days, P = 0.85). Fifteen patients (11% overall cohort) accounted for 18 admissions attributable to 16 separate irAE. irAE was not considered as a differential diagnosis on admission in 7 patients (38%). In those patients, commencement of corticosteroids was delayed (1.5 days, P = 0.01) but this did not translate into adverse outcomes such as prolonged admissions, prolonged steroid use or long-term complications. All patients with irAE were managed with high-dose corticosteroids. One death resulted from irAE (pneumonitis).

CONCLUSIONS

A sum of 11% patients receiving ICI required hospital admission for irAE. The relatively high rate of irAE as a missed differential diagnosis on admission suggests a need for improved cross-discipline awareness, education, and institutional management guidelines.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs of adverse events among patients with metastatic urothelial cancer in USA

Aim: To estimate incremental costs and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with select severe adverse events (AEs) and AEs of any severity in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line (1L) therapy. Materials & methods: Adults treated with 1L systemic therapy between January 2012 and September 2017 with ≥1 urothelial cancer diagnosis were identified using claims data. Per-patient-per-month cost differences and HRU rate ratios comparing patients with and without select AEs were estimated. Results: Patients with any severe select AEs had higher costs than those without (cost difference = $6130 per-patient-per-month; p < 0.001). Healthcare costs and HRU for patients with select AEs were significantly higher versus those without. Conclusion: Select AEs during 1L therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma can result in significant burden to patients and healthcare systems.