1
|
Suwanvecho S, Suwanrusme H, Jirakulaporn T, Issarachai S, Taechakraichana N, Lungchukiet P, Decha W, Boonpakdee W, Thanakarn N, Wongrattananon P, Preininger AM, Solomon M, Wang S, Hekmat R, Dankwa-Mullan I, Shortliffe E, Patel VL, Arriaga Y, Jackson GP, Kiatikajornthada N. Comparison of an oncology clinical decision-support system's recommendations with actual treatment decisions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:832-838. [PMID: 33517389 PMCID: PMC7973455 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective IBM(R) Watson for Oncology (WfO) is a clinical decision-support system (CDSS) that provides evidence-informed therapeutic options to cancer-treating clinicians. A panel of experienced oncologists compared CDSS treatment options to treatment decisions made by clinicians to characterize the quality of CDSS therapeutic options and decisions made in practice. Methods This study included patients treated between 1/2017 and 7/2018 for breast, colon, lung, and rectal cancers at Bumrungrad International Hospital (BIH), Thailand. Treatments selected by clinicians were paired with therapeutic options presented by the CDSS and coded to mask the origin of options presented. The panel rated the acceptability of each treatment in the pair by consensus, with acceptability defined as compliant with BIH’s institutional practices. Descriptive statistics characterized the study population and treatment-decision evaluations by cancer type and stage. Results Nearly 60% (187) of 313 treatment pairs for breast, lung, colon, and rectal cancers were identical or equally acceptable, with 70% (219) of WfO therapeutic options identical to, or acceptable alternatives to, BIH therapy. In 30% of cases (94), 1 or both treatment options were rated as unacceptable. Of 32 cases where both WfO and BIH options were acceptable, WfO was preferred in 18 cases and BIH in 14 cases. Colorectal cancers exhibited the highest proportion of identical or equally acceptable treatments; stage IV cancers demonstrated the lowest. Conclusion This study demonstrates that a system designed in the US to support, rather than replace, cancer-treating clinicians provides therapeutic options which are generally consistent with recommendations from oncologists outside the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harit Suwanrusme
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | | | | | - Wimolrat Decha
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wisanu Boonpakdee
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nittaya Thanakarn
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | | | - Suwei Wang
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Edward Shortliffe
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vimla L Patel
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- New York Academy of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yull Arriaga
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gretchen Purcell Jackson
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Narongsak Kiatikajornthada
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
- Corresponding Author: Narongsak Kiatikajornthada, MD, Bumrungrad International Hospital, 33 Soi Sukhumvit 3, Khlong Toei Nuea, Watthana, Bangkok 10110, Thailand;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Emani S, Rui A, Rocha HAL, Rizvi RF, Juaçaba SF, Jackson GP, Bates DW. Physician Perception and Satisfaction with Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Treatment: The Watson for Oncology Experience and Implications for Low-Middle Income Countries (Preprint). JMIR Cancer 2021; 8:e31461. [PMID: 35389353 PMCID: PMC9030908 DOI: 10.2196/31461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
As technology continues to improve, health care systems have the opportunity to use a variety of innovative tools for decision-making, including artificial intelligence (AI) applications. However, there has been little research on the feasibility and efficacy of integrating AI systems into real-world clinical practice, especially from the perspectives of clinicians who use such tools. In this paper, we review physicians’ perceptions of and satisfaction with an AI tool, Watson for Oncology, which is used for the treatment of cancer. Watson for Oncology has been implemented in several different settings, including Brazil, China, India, South Korea, and Mexico. By focusing on the implementation of an AI-based clinical decision support system for oncology, we aim to demonstrate how AI can be both beneficial and challenging for cancer management globally and particularly for low-middle–income countries. By doing so, we hope to highlight the need for additional research on user experience and the unique social, cultural, and political barriers to the successful implementation of AI in low-middle–income countries for cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivas Emani
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Angela Rui
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Hermano Alexandre Lima Rocha
- Department of Community Health, Federal University of Cearrá, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | | | - Sergio Ferreira Juaçaba
- Instituto do Câncer do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
- Rodolfo Teofilo College, Fortaleza CE, Brazil
| | - Gretchen Purcell Jackson
- Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, United States
- Departments of Pediatric Surgery, Pediatrics, and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - David W Bates
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|