1
|
Diab A, Gogas H, Sandhu S, Long GV, Ascierto PA, Larkin J, Sznol M, Franke F, Ciuleanu TE, Pereira C, Muñoz Couselo E, Bronzon Damian F, Schenker M, Perfetti A, Lebbe C, Quéreux G, Meier F, Curti BD, Rojas C, Arriaga Y, Yang H, Zhou M, Ravimohan S, Statkevich P, Tagliaferri MA, Khushalani NI. Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab in Untreated Advanced Melanoma: The Open-Label, Phase III PIVOT IO 001 Trial Results. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4756-4767. [PMID: 37651676 PMCID: PMC10602507 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite marked advances in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma, the need for novel therapies remains. Bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG), a pegylated interleukin-2 (IL-2) cytokine prodrug, demonstrated efficacy in the phase II PIVOT-02 trial. PIVOT IO 001 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03635983) is a phase III, randomized, open-label study that builds on the PIVOT-02 results in first-line melanoma. METHODS Patients with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive BEMPEG plus nivolumab (NIVO) or NIVO monotherapy. Primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review and overall survival (OS). Secondary and exploratory end points included additional efficacy measures, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics analyses. RESULTS In 783 patients (n = 391, BEMPEG plus NIVO; n = 392, NIVO monotherapy), the median follow-up was 11.6 months in the intent-to-treat population. The ORR with BEMPEG plus NIVO was 27.7% versus 36.0% with NIVO (two-sided P = .0311). The median PFS with BEMPEG plus NIVO was 4.17 months (95% CI, 3.52 to 5.55) versus 4.99 months (95% CI, 4.14 to 7.82) with NIVO (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 97% CI, 0.88 to 1.35; P = .3988). The median OS was 29.67 months (95% CI, 22.14 to not reached [NR]) with BEMPEG plus NIVO versus 28.88 months (95% CI, 21.32 to NR) with NIVO (HR, 0.94; 99.929% CI, 0.59 to 1.48; P = .6361). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and serious AE rates were higher with the combination (21.7% and 10.1%, respectively) versus NIVO (11.5% and 5.5%, respectively). BEMPEG PK exposure and absolute lymphocyte count changes after BEMPEG plus NIVO were comparable between PIVOT IO 001 and PIVOT-02. CONCLUSION The PIVOT IO 001 study did not meet its primary end points of ORR, PFS, and OS. Increased toxicity was observed with BEMPEG plus NIVO versus NIVO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adi Diab
- Melanoma Medical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paolo A. Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - James Larkin
- Medical Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mario Sznol
- Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, Smilow Cancer Hospital Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Fabio Franke
- Medical Oncology, Oncosite Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Ijui, Brazil
| | - Tudor E. Ciuleanu
- Medical Oncology, Institutul Prof Dr Ion Chiricuţă, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Caio Pereira
- Fundação Pio XII, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Eva Muñoz Couselo
- Medical Oncology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Michael Schenker
- Sf Nectarie Oncology Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania
| | - Aldo Perfetti
- Clínica Adventista Belgrano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- AP-HP Department of Dermato-oncology and CIC, INSERM U976, Cancer Institute APHP, Nord-Université Paris Cite, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Quéreux
- Department of Dermatology, CIC 1413, de Cancéro-Dermatologie-CIC Biothérapie Nantes, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Cancer Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Brendan D. Curti
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | - Carlos Rojas
- Medical Oncology, Bradford Hill Clinical Research Center, Santiago, Chile
| | - Yull Arriaga
- Medical Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Haisu Yang
- Medical Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Ming Zhou
- Medical Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | | | - Paul Statkevich
- Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hannan R, Mohamad O, de Leon AD, Manna S, Pop LM, Zhang Z, Mannala S, Christie A, Christley S, Monson N, Ishihara D, Hsu EJ, Ahn C, Kapur P, Chen M, Arriaga Y, Courtney K, Cantarel B, Wakeland EK, Fu YX, Pedrosa I, Cowell L, Wang T, Margulis V, Choy H, Timmerman RD, Brugarolas J. Outcome and Immune Correlates of a Phase II Trial of High-Dose Interleukin-2 and Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:6716-6725. [PMID: 34551906 PMCID: PMC9924935 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase II clinical trial evaluated whether the addition of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR), which may promote tumor antigen presentation, improves the overall response rate (ORR) to high-dose IL2 (HD IL2) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with pathologic evidence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and radiographic evidence of metastasis were enrolled in this single-arm trial and were treated with SAbR, followed by HD IL2. ORR was assessed based on nonirradiated metastases. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and treatment-related tumor-specific immune response. Correlative studies involved whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing, T-cell receptor sequencing, cytokine analysis, and mass cytometry on patient samples. RESULTS Thirty ethnically diverse mRCC patients were enrolled. A median of two metastases were treated with SAbR. Among 25 patients evaluable by RECIST v1.1, ORR was 16% with 8% complete responses. Median OS was 37 months. Treatment-related adverse events (AE) included 22 grade ≥3 events that were not dissimilar from HD IL2 alone. There were no grade 5 AEs. A correlation was observed between SAbR to lung metastases and improved PFS (P = 0.0165). Clinical benefit correlated with frameshift mutational load, mast cell tumor infiltration, decreased circulating tumor-associated T-cell clones, and T-cell clonal expansion. Higher regulatory/CD8+ T-cell ratios at baseline in the tumor and periphery correlated with no clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS Adding SAbR did not improve the response rate to HD IL2 in patients with mRCC in this study. Tissue analyses suggest a possible correlation between frameshift mutation load as well as tumor immune infiltrates and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. .,Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco; San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Alberto Diaz de Leon
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Subrata Manna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Laurentiu M. Pop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ze Zhang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Samantha Mannala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Scott Christley
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Nancy Monson
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Dan Ishihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Eric J. Hsu
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Chul Ahn
- Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Payal Kapur
- Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Mingyi Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yull Arriaga
- Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kevin Courtney
- Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Brandi Cantarel
- Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Edward K. Wakeland
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yang-Xin Fu
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lindsay Cowell
- Department of Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Tao Wang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Hak Choy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Robert D. Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Suwanvecho S, Suwanrusme H, Jirakulaporn T, Issarachai S, Taechakraichana N, Lungchukiet P, Decha W, Boonpakdee W, Thanakarn N, Wongrattananon P, Preininger AM, Solomon M, Wang S, Hekmat R, Dankwa-Mullan I, Shortliffe E, Patel VL, Arriaga Y, Jackson GP, Kiatikajornthada N. Comparison of an oncology clinical decision-support system's recommendations with actual treatment decisions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:832-838. [PMID: 33517389 PMCID: PMC7973455 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective IBM(R) Watson for Oncology (WfO) is a clinical decision-support system (CDSS) that provides evidence-informed therapeutic options to cancer-treating clinicians. A panel of experienced oncologists compared CDSS treatment options to treatment decisions made by clinicians to characterize the quality of CDSS therapeutic options and decisions made in practice. Methods This study included patients treated between 1/2017 and 7/2018 for breast, colon, lung, and rectal cancers at Bumrungrad International Hospital (BIH), Thailand. Treatments selected by clinicians were paired with therapeutic options presented by the CDSS and coded to mask the origin of options presented. The panel rated the acceptability of each treatment in the pair by consensus, with acceptability defined as compliant with BIH’s institutional practices. Descriptive statistics characterized the study population and treatment-decision evaluations by cancer type and stage. Results Nearly 60% (187) of 313 treatment pairs for breast, lung, colon, and rectal cancers were identical or equally acceptable, with 70% (219) of WfO therapeutic options identical to, or acceptable alternatives to, BIH therapy. In 30% of cases (94), 1 or both treatment options were rated as unacceptable. Of 32 cases where both WfO and BIH options were acceptable, WfO was preferred in 18 cases and BIH in 14 cases. Colorectal cancers exhibited the highest proportion of identical or equally acceptable treatments; stage IV cancers demonstrated the lowest. Conclusion This study demonstrates that a system designed in the US to support, rather than replace, cancer-treating clinicians provides therapeutic options which are generally consistent with recommendations from oncologists outside the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harit Suwanrusme
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | | | | | - Wimolrat Decha
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wisanu Boonpakdee
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nittaya Thanakarn
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | | | - Suwei Wang
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Edward Shortliffe
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vimla L Patel
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- New York Academy of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yull Arriaga
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gretchen Purcell Jackson
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Narongsak Kiatikajornthada
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Khlong Toei Nuea, Bangkok, Thailand
- Corresponding Author: Narongsak Kiatikajornthada, MD, Bumrungrad International Hospital, 33 Soi Sukhumvit 3, Khlong Toei Nuea, Watthana, Bangkok 10110, Thailand;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arriaga Y, Tkacz J, Roebuck MC, George J, Willis V, Dankwa-mullan I. Abstract 2617: Factors associated with utilization of post-mastectomy adjuvant therapies in privately insured female patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-2617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In a commercially insured cohort of female patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer we examined geographic and clinical factors associated with variation in uptake of post-mastectomy adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET), cytotoxic chemotherapy (ACT) and biologic therapy (ABT).
Methods: Retrospective observational study of the IBM® MarketScan® claims data from 01/01/2012-03/31/2018. Eligibility criteria included: 1) diagnosis of non-metastatic invasive breast cancer in female patients 18 years old or older, 2) mastectomy within 6 months of initial diagnosis. Patients with breast carcinoma in situ only and those who received neoadjuvant therapies were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy, including: 1) age, insurance plan type, and select chronic comorbid conditions, 2) sociodemographic, community-level (ZIP3) measures obtained from the 2019 Area Health Resource Files, and 3) time effects. Analyses were conducted at the patient level with standard errors clustered by ZIP3.
Results: Of the 16,680 patients identified, 5,341 (32%) received AET only, 2,290 (14%) received ACT only and 729 (4%) received ABT. 7,911 (47%) did not have any claims for adjuvant therapy. 3% received adjuvant combinations, mostly post-radiation treatment (2%). We observed the following statistically significant associations (p<.001 to p<.05) between selected variables and adjuvant therapy use:- Increasing age and higher likelihood of AET (1.2-1.8) but decreased likelihood of ACT (.8-.03) and ABT (.98-.24).- Primary health policy holders were 13% more likely to receive ACT compared to a spouse or other dependent.- Patients residing in the Midwest and higher likelihood of receiving AET (OR=1.15), ACT (OR=1.14), and ABT (OR=1.44) compared to those in the Northeast whereas those in the West and South had higher likelihood of receiving ACT (OR=1.31; OR=1.21), and ABT (OR=1.66; OR=1.36).- Patients residing in areas with increased Black resident density (ZIP3 level) and lower likelihood of receiving AET (OR=.58), ACT (OR=.61), and ABT (OR=.45).- Percentage population with a 4-year college degree and decreased likelihood of ACT (OR=.33).- Genetic testing and increased likelihood of AET (OR=1.92), ACT (OR=2.72), and ABT (OR=1.91).- Breast carcinoma in situ diagnosis preceding invasive disease diagnosis and decreased likelihood of receiving AET (OR=.56), ACT (OR=.2) and ABT (OR=.65).
Conclusions: In a large cohort of commercially insured patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer, uptake of post-mastectomy adjuvant therapies varied and was influenced by several non-clinical factors. Results of real-world evidence cancer studies may support treatment-decision making, guide adoption of value-based care models and reduce treatment disparities.
Citation Format: Yull Arriaga, Joseph Tkacz, M Christopher Roebuck, Judy George, Van Willis, Irene Dankwa-mullan. Factors associated with utilization of post-mastectomy adjuvant therapies in privately insured female patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2617.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the causal agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), quickly spread around the world, resulting in the most aggressive pandemic experienced in more than 100 years. Research on targeted therapies and vaccines has been initiated on an unprecedented scale and speed but will take months and even years to come to fruition. Meanwhile, the efficacy of emerging therapeutics for use in treating COVID-19 is feverishly being investigated to identify the best available treatment options for dealing with the current wave of disease. This review of publications with a "treatment" tag through June 29, 2020 in the National Library of Medicine's LitCovid literature hub, provides frontline clinicians with a pragmatic summary of the current state of the rapidly evolving evidence supporting emerging candidate therapeutics for COVID-19. Two main categories of pharmaceutical therapeutics are showing promise: those with antiviral activity directly addressing infection and those that counteract the inflammatory cytokine storm induced by severe disease. Preliminary results suggest that other approaches such as convalescent plasma therapy and lung radiation therapy may have some efficacy. The current clinical evidence for potential treatments is preliminary-often small retrospective series or early results of randomized trials-and the science is evolving rapidly. The long-term results from large, well-designed randomized controlled trials will provide definitive evidence for therapeutic effectiveness and are likely months away. The trial landscape for promising therapies is described.
Collapse
Key Words
- COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019
- CPT, convalescent plasma therapy
- CQ, chloroquine
- EC50, half-maximal effective concentration
- HCQ, hydroxychloroquine
- ICU, intensive care unit
- IL-6, interleukin 6
- JAK, Janus kinase
- LPV/RTV, lopinavir/ritonavir
- MERS, Middle East respiratory syndrome
- RCT, randomized controlled trial
- SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome
- SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
- WHO, World Health Organization
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Van C. Willis
- IBM Watson Health, Center for AI, Research, and Evaluation, Cambridge, MA
| | - Yull Arriaga
- IBM Watson Health, Center for AI, Research, and Evaluation, Cambridge, MA
| | - Dilhan Weeraratne
- IBM Watson Health, Center for AI, Research, and Evaluation, Cambridge, MA
| | - Fredy Reyes
- IBM Watson Health, Center for AI, Research, and Evaluation, Cambridge, MA
| | - Gretchen P. Jackson
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arriaga Y, Huang H, Wang S, Scheufele E, Rhee K, Jackson G, Mullan ID. 496P Factors associated with colorectal cancer in patients 18 to 50 years old in the United States. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
7
|
Kolhe R, Mondal A, Kota V, Sahajpal N, Ahluwalia M, Njau A, Weeraratne D, Arriaga Y, Brotman D, Jackson G, Snowdon J. Abstract 6579: Clinical utility of comprehensive genomic testing with artificial-intelligence-based analysis to identify targetable sub-clonal events in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-6579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly used to inform diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic decisions in AML at the time of first presentation. We highlight the utility of NGS combined with Watson™ for Genomics (WfG), an artificial-intelligence-based decision-support system, in identifying new clinically actionable alterations as a result of clonal evolution in the relapsed disease setting. In less than 3 minutes, WfG identified an IDH1 R132H pathogenic mutation in the relapsed sample sequenced with the Illumina TruSight Tumor 170-gene panel leading to the compassionate use of ivosidenib. In addition, mutations in two genes resulting in increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and mutations in PTEN resulting in activation of the MTOR/PI3K signaling pathway were detected by WfG. In February 2018, a previously healthy 23-year old Caucasian female presented with AML consisting of 80% blasts with positive FLT3 mutation. She received induction cytarabine plus daunorubicin (7+3) followed by multikinase inhibitor therapy with midostaurin on days 8 to 21. A 28-day bone marrow biopsy showed persistent disease with 40% blasts. In March 2018, the patient underwent re-induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) followed by midostaurin on days 8 to 21. A bone marrow biopsy after completion of re-induction therapy showed complete remission with < 5% blasts (CR1). In May 2018, a matched donor was not found on a bone marrow registry, and the patient underwent a post-remission dual unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Engraftment was not achieved. In July 2018, the patient had disease relapse with the presence of circulating blasts and 7% of blasts in the bone marrow. While NGS is typically not performed on relapsed samples, WfG identified IDH1 R132H and PTEN C78T pathogenic mutations using the 170-gene panel. Based on these results, the patient initiated azacytidine plus the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib. In August 2018, a bone marrow biopsy showed less than 5% blasts positive for a FLT3-ITD mutation. In September 2018, the patient underwent reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation followed by haploidentical allogeneic HSCT from her mother. Maintenance therapy with azacytidine plus ivosidenib was continued until the present time. Currently, the patient is in remission for over 15 months without evidence of AML minimal residual disease. She has developed mild skin chronic graft-versus-host disease that is controlled with standard treatment. She works on a full-time basis and has excellent functional status. The combination of CGP, artificial intelligence, and expert care has resulted in an excellent outcome in a patient with relapsed AML. In conclusion, our experience suggests that CGP testing should be considered at different time points, at least in the relapsed setting, to help treating physicians alter or help improve clinical outcome. CGP testing in a relapsed setting is precluded because it is not covered by payers. In support of optimal care, we have initiated a new program for compassionate use of genomic testing, where such testing is medically necessary, but not covered by insurance or payer supported.
Citation Format: Ravindra Kolhe, Ashis Mondal, Vamsi Kota, Nkhil Sahajpal, Meenakshi Ahluwalia, Allan Njau, Dilhan Weeraratne, Yull Arriaga, David Brotman, Gretchen Jackson, Jane Snowdon. Clinical utility of comprehensive genomic testing with artificial-intelligence-based analysis to identify targetable sub-clonal events in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6579.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vamsi Kota
- 1Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA
| | | | | | - Allan Njau
- 1Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arriaga Y, Hekmat R, Draulis K, Wang S, Felix W, Dankwa-mullan I, Rhee K, Jackson G. Abstract P4-14-05: A systematic review of concordance studies using Watson for Oncology (WfO) to support breast cancer treatment decisions: A four-year global experience. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p4-14-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Watson for Oncology (WfO) is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision-support system (CDSS) that presents personalized therapeutic options to support cancer-treating physicians in making treatment decisions for cancer patients. WfO was released in 2015, and it has been deployed in over 200 institutions across the world. Many academic centers have examined WfO’s performance by measuring concordance between WfO therapeutic options and treatment recommendations by multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) or individual clinicians (ICs). This study systematically reviewed the results of such concordance studies for breast cancer.
Methods: We conducted a review of the WfO publication database and a PubMed search to identify WfO concordance studies in breast cancer patients, published from 01/01/2015 to 06/30/2019. Studies were excluded if they measured concordance for multiple cancer types but did not include individual concordance for breast cancer. Concordance was defined as agreement between WfO “Recommended” and “For Consideration” treatment options and treatments prescribed by MTBs or ICs. Mean concordance rates were calculated as an average, weighted by the number of patients in each study. Concordance rates between MTBs and ICs were compared with z-test of two proportions. Subgroup analyses for larger studies were summarized.
Results: Table 1 presents the results of nine identified breast cancer concordance studies (4,427 patients) from China, India, and Thailand. Five studies (1,528 patients) determined concordance with MTB and 4 (2,899 patients) with ICs. WfO treatment options were compared to historical treatment recommendations by MTBs and ICs. Mean concordance for all studies was 70.8% (range 55 - 98%). Mean concordance with MTBs of 90.7% (range 79 - 98%) was significantly higher than the concordance between WfO and ICs of 59.9% (range 55-76%) p<0.0001.
Table 1Study/LocationNumber of patientsConcordance Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Studies (MTBs)Zhang XC, et al. Ann Oncol 2017;28:x170 / China11979%Yue L, Yang L. Ann Oncol 2017;28:x162 / China3198%Somashekhar SP, et al. Ann Oncol 2018 1; 29(2):418-423 / India63893%Zhou N, et al. The Oncologist 2018;23:1-8 / China12082%Somashekhar SP, et al. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37 (suppl; abstr 6533) / India62092%MTB subtotals152890.7%Individual Clinicians Studies (ICs)Suwanvecho S, et al. J Clin Oncol 2017;35 (suppl; abstr 6589) / Thailand21176%Jiang Z, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018;36 (suppl; abstr 18566) / China1,99755%Suwanrusme H, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018;36 (suppl; abstr 18584) / Thailand26470%32672%Suwanvecho S et al. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37 (suppl; abstr 6553) / Thailand10160%ICs subtotals289959.9%
Mean concordance in China, Thailand and India were 78.5%, 69.5%, and 92.5%, respectively. A large IC study from China including 1,997 patients found concordance in triple negative, high risk non-metastatic, and metastatic breast cancers of 69%, 66%, and 50%, respectively. A MTB study from China in 120 patients found concordance for luminal A, luminal B and triple negative breast cancers of 63%, 87% and 79%, respectively. Reported reasons for discordance varied among studies and included locally unavailable treatments, individual physician or MTB management preferences, and age older than 75 years.
Conclusions
Overall concordance between the WfO therapeutic options and decisions of both MTBs and ICs was high, demonstrating performance comparable with experts across the world. Higher concordance was observed between WfO and MTBs versus WfO and ICs, likely reflecting the multidisciplinary expertise having greater agreement with evidence and guideline-based recommendations of WfO than decisions of individual clinicians. This finding illustrates a role for clinical decision support in practice. Concordance varied across countries, reflecting the need for localization to address regional differences in practice.
Citation Format: Yull Arriaga, Rezzan Hekmat, Karlis Draulis, Suwei Wang, Winnie Felix, Irene Dankwa-mullan, Kyu Rhee, Gretchen Jackson. A systematic review of concordance studies using Watson for Oncology (WfO) to support breast cancer treatment decisions: A four-year global experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-05.
Collapse
|
9
|
Courtney KD, Ma Y, Diaz de Leon A, Christie A, Xie Z, Woolford L, Singla N, Joyce A, Hill H, Madhuranthakam AJ, Yuan Q, Xi Y, Zhang Y, Chang J, Fatunde O, Arriaga Y, Frankel AE, Kalva S, Zhang S, McKenzie T, Reig Torras O, Figlin RA, Rini BI, McKay RM, Kapur P, Wang T, Pedrosa I, Brugarolas J. HIF-2 Complex Dissociation, Target Inhibition, and Acquired Resistance with PT2385, a First-in-Class HIF-2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 26:793-803. [PMID: 31727677 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The heterodimeric transcription factor HIF-2 is arguably the most important driver of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Although considered undruggable, structural analyses at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW, Dallas, TX) identified a vulnerability in the α subunit, which heterodimerizes with HIF1β, ultimately leading to the development of PT2385, a first-in-class inhibitor. PT2385 was safe and active in a first-in-human phase I clinical trial of patients with extensively pretreated ccRCC at UTSW and elsewhere. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, and disease control ≥4 months was achieved in 42% of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective companion substudy involving a subset of patients enrolled in the phase I clinical trial at UTSW (n = 10), who were treated at the phase II dose or above, involving multiparametric MRI, blood draws, and serial biopsies for biochemical, whole exome, and RNA-sequencing studies. RESULTS PT2385 inhibited HIF-2 in nontumor tissues, as determined by a reduction in erythropoietin levels (a pharmacodynamic marker), in all but one patient, who had the lowest drug concentrations. PT2385 dissociated HIF-2 complexes in ccRCC metastases, and inhibited HIF-2 target gene expression. In contrast, HIF-1 complexes were unaffected. Prolonged PT2385 treatment resulted in the acquisition of resistance, and we identified a gatekeeper mutation (G323E) in HIF2α, which interferes with drug binding and precluded HIF-2 complex dissociation. In addition, we identified an acquired TP53 mutation elsewhere, suggesting a possible alternate mechanism of resistance. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate a core dependency on HIF-2 in metastatic ccRCC and establish PT2385 as a highly specific HIF-2 inhibitor in humans. New approaches will be required to target mutant HIF-2 beyond PT2385 or the closely related PT2977 (MK-6482).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin D Courtney
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yuanqing Ma
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Alberto Diaz de Leon
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Zhiqun Xie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Population and Data Sciences, Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Layton Woolford
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Allison Joyce
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Haley Hill
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ananth J Madhuranthakam
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Qing Yuan
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yin Xi
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Population and Data Sciences, Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jenny Chang
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Oluwatomilade Fatunde
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yull Arriaga
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Arthur E Frankel
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sanjeeva Kalva
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Song Zhang
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Tiffani McKenzie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Oscar Reig Torras
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert A Figlin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brian I Rini
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Renée M McKay
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Payal Kapur
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Tao Wang
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Population and Data Sciences, Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. .,Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - James Brugarolas
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. .,Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beg M, Boothman D, Khosama L, Arriaga Y, Verma U, Sanjeeviaiah A, Kazmi S, Fattah F, Pilarski S, Rodriguez M, Lindsey D, Linden S, Schwartz B, Laheru D. A phase I/Ib, multi-center trial of ARQ-761 (Beta-Lapachone) with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz247.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
11
|
Mokdad AA, Zhu H, Beg MS, Arriaga Y, Dowell JE, Singal AG, Yopp AC. Efficacy and Safety of Bavituximab in Combination with Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase II Clinical Trial. Target Oncol 2019; 14:541-550. [DOI: 10.1007/s11523-019-00663-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
12
|
Kobayashi M, Chung JS, Beg M, Arriaga Y, Verma U, Courtney K, Mansour J, Haley B, Khan S, Horiuchi Y, Ramani V, Harker D, Gopal P, Araghizadeh F, Cruz PD, Ariizumi K. Blocking Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Function via Anti-DC-HIL/GPNMB Antibody Restores the In Vitro Integrity of T Cells from Cancer Patients. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:828-838. [PMID: 30049749 PMCID: PMC7315386 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Blocking the function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) is an attractive approach for cancer immunotherapy. Having shown DC-HIL/GPNMB to be the T-cell-inhibitory receptor mediating the suppressor function of MDSCs, we evaluated the potential of anti-DC-HIL mAb as an MDSC-targeting cancer treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with metastatic cancer (n = 198) were analyzed by flow cytometry for DC-HIL or PDL1 expression on blood CD14+HLA-DRno/lo MDSCs. Their suppressor function was assessed by in vitro coculture with autologous T cells, and the ability of anti-DC-HIL or anti-PDL1 mAb to reverse such function was determined. Tumor expression of these receptors was examined histologically, and the antitumor activity of the mAb was evaluated by attenuated growth of colon cancers in mice. RESULTS Patients with metastatic cancer had high blood levels of DC-HIL+ MDSCs compared with healthy controls. Anti-DC-HIL mAb reversed the in vitro function in ∼80% of cancer patients tested, particularly for colon cancer. Despite very low expression on blood MDSCs, anti-PDL1 mAb was as effective as anti-DC-HIL mAb in reversing MDSC function, a paradoxical phenomenon we found to be due to upregulated expression of PDL1 by T-cell-derived IFNγ in cocultures. DC-HIL is not expressed by colorectal cancer cells but by CD14+ cells infiltrating the tumor. Finally, anti-DC-HIL mAb attenuated growth of preestablished colon tumors by reducing MDSCs and increasing IFNγ-secreting T cells in the tumor microenvironment, with similar outcomes to anti-PDL1 mAb. CONCLUSIONS Blocking DC-HIL function is a potentially useful treatment for at least colorectal cancer with high blood levels of DC-HIL+ MDSCs.See related commentary by Colombo, p. 453.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Kobayashi
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jin-Sung Chung
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Muhammad Beg
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yull Arriaga
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Udit Verma
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kevin Courtney
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - John Mansour
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Barbara Haley
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Saad Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yutaka Horiuchi
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Iruma District, Saitama Prefecture, Japan
| | - Vijay Ramani
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - David Harker
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Purva Gopal
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Farshid Araghizadeh
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ponciano D Cruz
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kiyoshi Ariizumi
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- I Alex Bowman
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Alberto Parra
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yull Arriaga
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bowman IA, Bent A, Le T, Christie A, Wardak Z, Arriaga Y, Courtney K, Hammers H, Barnett S, Mickey B, Patel T, Whitworth T, Stojadinovic S, Hannan R, Nedzi L, Timmerman R, Brugarolas J. Improved Survival Outcomes for Kidney Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 17:e263-e272. [PMID: 30538068 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) occur frequently in patients with metastatic kidney cancer and are a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Although historically associated with a poor prognosis, survival outcomes for patients in the modern era are incompletely characterized. In particular, outcomes after adjusting for systemic therapy administration and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk factors are not well-known. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective database of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center between 2006 and 2015 was created. Data relevant to their diagnosis, treatment course, and outcomes were systematically collected. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients with BM were compared with patients without BM after adjusting for the timing of BM diagnosis, either prior to or during first-line systemic therapy. The impact of stratification according to IMDC risk group was assessed. RESULTS A total of 56 (28.4%) of 268 patients with metastatic RCC were diagnosed with BM prior to or during first-line systemic therapy. Median overall survival (OS) for systemic therapy-naive patients with BM compared with matched patients without BM was 19.5 versus 28.7 months (P = .0117). When analyzed according to IMDC risk group, the median OS for patients with BM was similar for favorable- and intermediate-risk patients (not reached vs. not reached; and 29.0 vs. 36.7 months; P = .5254), and inferior for poor-risk patients (3.5 vs. 9.4 months; P = .0462). For patients developing BM while on first-line systemic therapy, survival from the time of progression did not significantly differ by presence or absence of BM (11.8 vs. 17.8 months; P = .6658). CONCLUSIONS Survival rates for patients with BM are significantly better than historical reports. After adjusting for systemic therapy, the survival rates of patients with BM in favorable- and intermediate-risk groups were remarkably better than expected and not statistically different from patients without BM, though this represents a single institution experience, and numbers are modest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Alex Bowman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | - Alisha Bent
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Tri Le
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Zabi Wardak
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yull Arriaga
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Kevin Courtney
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Hans Hammers
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Samuel Barnett
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Bruce Mickey
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Toral Patel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Tony Whitworth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Raquibul Hannan
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Lucien Nedzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gerber DE, Beg MS, Fattah F, Frankel AE, Fatunde O, Arriaga Y, Dowell JE, Bisen A, Leff RD, Meek CC, Putnam WC, Kallem RR, Subramaniyan I, Dong Y, Bolluyt J, Sarode V, Luo X, Xie Y, Schwartz B, Boothman DA. Phase 1 study of ARQ 761, a β-lapachone analogue that promotes NQO1-mediated programmed cancer cell necrosis. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:928-936. [PMID: 30318513 PMCID: PMC6203852 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0278-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) is a two-electron oxidoreductase expressed in multiple tumour types. ARQ 761 is a β-lapachone (β-lap) analogue that exploits the unique elevation of NQO1 found in solid tumours to cause tumour-specific cell death. METHODS We performed a 3+3 dose escalation study of 3 schedules (weekly, every other week, 2/3 weeks) of ARQ 761 in patients with refractory advanced solid tumours. Tumour tissue was analysed for NQO1 expression. After 20 patients were analysed, enrolment was restricted to patients with NQO1-high tumours (H-score ≥ 200). RESULTS A total of 42 patients were treated. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 4. Maximum tolerated dose was 390 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion every other week. Dose-limiting toxicity was anaemia. The most common treatment-related adverse events were anaemia (79%), fatigue (45%), hypoxia (33%), nausea (17%), and vomiting (17%). Transient grade 3 hypoxia, reflecting possible methemoglobinaemia, occurred in 26% of patients. Among 32 evaluable patients, best response was stable disease (n = 12); 6 patients had tumour shrinkage. There was a trend towards improved efficacy in NQO1-high tumours (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS ARQ 761 has modest single-agent activity, which appears associated with tumour NQO1 expression. Principal toxicities include anaemia and possible methemoglobinaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E Gerber
- Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. .,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. .,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
| | - M Shaalan Beg
- Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Farjana Fattah
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Arthur E Frankel
- Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Oluwatomilade Fatunde
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Yull Arriaga
- Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Jonathan E Dowell
- Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Ajit Bisen
- Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Richard D Leff
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Claudia C Meek
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - William C Putnam
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Raja Reddy Kallem
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | | | - Ying Dong
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Joyce Bolluyt
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Venetia Sarode
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Xin Luo
- Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Yang Xie
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.,Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | | | - David A Boothman
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Woldu SL, Moore JA, Ci B, Freifeld Y, Clinton TN, Aydin AM, Singla N, Laura-Maria K, Hutchinson RC, Amatruda JF, Sagalowsky A, Lotan Y, Arriaga Y, Margulis V, Xie Y, Bagrodia A. Practice Patterns and Impact of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection on Testicular Cancer Outcomes. Eur Urol Oncol 2018; 1:242-251. [PMID: 31058267 PMCID: PMC6494089 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Owing to surgical complexity and controversy regarding indications, there are wide practice variations in the use of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND). Objective To evaluate patterns of PC-RPLND use in the USA and evaluate the association between PC-RPLND and survival in advanced nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs). Design setting and participants A retrospective, observational study using National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data from 2004-2014 for 5062 men diagnosed with stage II/III NSGCT. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis In a comparative analysis based on receipt of PC-RPLND, the primary outcome of interest was factors associated with omission of PC-RPLND as explored via logistic regression. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the association between PC-RPLND and overall survival (OS) via multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching (PSM). Results and limitations Patients undergoing PC-RPLND were more likely to be younger, white, privately insured, and reside in more educated/wealthier regions (p < 0.001). Insurance status was independently associated with receipt of PC-RPLND; compared to patients with private insurance, those without insurance were significantly less likely to receive PC-RPLND (odds ratio 0.49; p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, age, comorbidity, non-private insurance, distance from hospital, clinical stage, and risk group were independently associated with all-cause mortality. In addition, omission of PC-RPLND remained associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.98; p < 0.001). After PSM, the 5-yr OS was significantly lower among those not undergoing PC-RPLND (72% vs 77%; p = 0.007). Conclusions PC-RPLND represents a critical part of the multidisciplinary management of NSGCT. Patients with non-private insurance are less likely to undergo PC-RPLND, and omission of PC-RPLND is associated with lower OS. Patient summary We evaluated the practice patterns for advanced testicular cancer management and found that patients who did not undergo a postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were more likely to have worse survival outcomes. Patients with unfavorable insurance were less likely to receive this surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solomon L. Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Joseph A. Moore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Bo Ci
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yuval Freifeld
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Timothy N. Clinton
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ahmet M. Aydin
- Department of Urology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Krabbe Laura-Maria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ryan C. Hutchinson
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James F. Amatruda
- Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Arthur Sagalowsky
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yull Arriaga
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yang Xie
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mohamad O, Diaz de Leon A, Schroeder S, Leiker A, Christie A, Zhang-Velten E, Trivedi L, Khan S, Desai NB, Laine A, Albuquerque K, Iyengar P, Arriaga Y, Courtney K, Gerber DE, Hammers H, Choy H, Timmerman R, Brugarolas J, Hannan R. Safety and efficacy of concurrent immune checkpoint inhibitors and hypofractionated body radiotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2018; 7:e1440168. [PMID: 29900043 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2018.1440168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Revised: 01/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Integration of hypofractionated body radiotherapy (H-RT) into immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy may be a promising strategy to improve the outcomes of ICIs, although sufficient data is lacking regarding the safety and efficacy of this regimen. We, hereby, reviewed the safety and efficacy of this combination in 59 patients treated with H-RT during or within 8 weeks of ICI infusion and compared results with historical reports of ICI treatment alone. Most patients had RCC or melanoma. Median follow-up was 11 months. Most patients received either Nivolumab alone or with Ipilimumab; 83% received stereotactic RT and 17% received conformal H-RT. Any grade adverse events (AEs) were reported in 46 patients, and grade 3-4 in 12 patients without any treatment-related grade 5 toxicity. The most common grade 3 AEs were fatigue and pneumonitis. Grade 3-4 toxicities were higher with ICI combination and with simultaneous ICIs. Overall, most any-grade or grade ≥3 AE rates did not differ significantly from historically reported rates with single-agent or multi-agent ICIs. Toxicity did not correlate with H-RT site, dose, fraction number, tumor type, or ICI and H-RT sequencing. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 months. Objective response rate (ORR) was 26%; 10% had complete response (CR). Median duration of response was 9.4 ± 4.6 months. H-RT of lung lesions was more likely to achieve CR than other sites. H-RT of bone lesions had a lower ORR than non-bone H-RT. In conclusion, combining body H-RT with ICIs is safe and promising. Prospective validation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama Mohamad
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Alberto Diaz de Leon
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Samuel Schroeder
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew Leiker
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Alana Christie
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Elizabeth Zhang-Velten
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lakshya Trivedi
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Saad Khan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Neil B Desai
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Aaron Laine
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kevin Albuquerque
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Puneeth Iyengar
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yull Arriaga
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kevin Courtney
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - David E Gerber
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Hans Hammers
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Hak Choy
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Robert Timmerman
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - James Brugarolas
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Kidney Cancer Program, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Woldu SL, Bagrodia A, Moore JA, Arriaga Y. Reply. Urology 2018; 112:111. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
19
|
Woldu SL, Aydin AM, Rao AV, Hutchinson RC, Singla N, Clinton TN, Krabbe LM, Passoni NM, Raj GV, Miller DS, Amatruda JF, Sagalowsky AI, Lotan Y, Arriaga Y, Margulis V, Bagrodia A. Differences at Presentation and Treatment of Testicular Cancer in Hispanic Men: Institutional and National Hospital-based Analyses. Urology 2018; 112:103-111. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Revised: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
20
|
Mohamad O, Leiker A, Schroeder S, Zhang E, Trivedi L, Gerber D, Khan S, Iyengar P, Albuquerque K, Arriaga Y, Courtney K, Brugarolas J, Hammers H, Timmerman R, Hannan R. Safety and Outcomes of Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
21
|
Kobayashi M, Chung JS, Beg M, Arriaga Y, Verma U, Courtney K, Mansour J, Haley B, Khan S, Horiuchi Y, Harker D, Gopal P, Cruz PD, Ariizumi K. Abstract 3660: Blocking the DC-HIL receptor reverses the T-cell suppression induced by proliferating myeloid-derived suppressor cells in common cancer types. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-3660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are the most potent suppressors of T-cell function, and their exponential proliferation in cancer states counteracts the benefits of immunotherapy given to these patients. Having discovered the T cell-inhibitory DC-HIL receptor, we showed that DC-HIL is responsible for MDSC’s T-cell suppressive function. We found that melanoma patients (but not healthy controls) harbor in the blood an expanded population of DC-HIL+ MDSC, whose suppressor effects in vitro can be blocked by our 3D5 anti-DC-HIL mAb. To determine whether similar outcomes apply to non-melanoma cancers, we recruited patients with metastases from bladder (BL, n=4), breast (BR, n=11), colon (CO, n=44), kidney (KI, n=6), lung (LU, n=20), pancreatic (PA, n=17), and prostate (PR, n=9) cancer. FACS analysis of blood samples showed all cancer types (except LU) were associated with elevated blood HLA-DRno/low CD14+ MDSC vs. age-matched controls (n=21, median of 0.5%). % DC-HIL+ MDSC in PBMC was also significantly high in all cancer types; median of 2.5% for BL; 1.7% for BR; 3.5% for CO; 3.6% for KI; 0.3% for LU; 1.8% for PA; and 4.8% for PR, vs. 0.04% for healthy controls. MDSC in all cancer types showed high DC-HIL-positivity (20-90% vs. 8% for controls). We assayed T-cell suppressor activity by purifying MDSC and T-cells from the same patient and co-culturing them at varying cell ratios, with co-stimulators. Activity was determined by % suppression in IFN-γ secretion, which was correlated with % DC-HIL-positivity of MDSC. MDSC from KI (n=3) were more suppressive than those from CO and PA, with suppressor activity correlating with DC-HIL-positivity: Pearson’s r for 0.5 for CO (n=13) and 0.73 for PA (n=8). We evaluated effects of anti-DC-HIL mAb on co-cultures of MDSC/ T-cells from cancer patients (n=25). The mAb restored IFN-γ secretion by >30% in 8/15 cases of CO; 4/8 of PA, and 2/2 of KI. To determine whether DC-HIL+ MDSC migrate into cancer sites, lesional specimens from CO patients (n=5) with high blood counts of DC-HIL+ MDSC were immunohistochemically stained for CD14 and DC-HIL expression: DC-HIL was absent from all cancer cells, but present strongly in many CD14+ cells surrounding the cancers. This outcome contrasts starkly with melanoma, in which DC-HIL was expressed highly by the cancer cells surrounded by only a few DC-HIL+ CD14+ cells. Finally we evaluated in vivo effects of blocking DC-HIL using a mouse model of MC38 colon cancer, which is DC-HILneg. MC38 tumor challenge induced DC-HIL+ Gr1lowLy6Chigh MDSC in the tumor site. Intravenous infusion of anti-DC-HIL mAb into mice with pre-established MC38 tumor significantly inhibited tumor growth by 50-70%, reduced blood levels of MDSC, and enhanced cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response. Our findings support DC-HIL blockade as a potential treatment for metastatic cancers, with high blood levels of DC-HIL+ MDSC as a prognostic marker for the best responders.
Citation Format: Masato Kobayashi, Jin-Sung Chung, Muhammad Beg, Yull Arriaga, Udit Verma, Kevin Courtney, John Mansour, Barbara Haley, Saad Khan, Yutaka Horiuchi, David Harker, Purva Gopal, Ponciano D. Cruz, Kiyoshi Ariizumi. Blocking the DC-HIL receptor reverses the T-cell suppression induced by proliferating myeloid-derived suppressor cells in common cancer types [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3660. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3660
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Muhammad Beg
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Yull Arriaga
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Udit Verma
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | | | - John Mansour
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Barbara Haley
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Saad Khan
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Yutaka Horiuchi
- 2Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - David Harker
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Purva Gopal
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ishihara D, Louder K, Akter M, Ahn C, Margulis V, Arriaga Y, Courtney K, Timmerman R, Brugarolas J, Hannan R. Phase 2 Trial of High-Dose Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC)—Interim Analysis of i-SAbR IL-2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
23
|
Van Cutsem E, Ciardiello F, Ychou M, Seitz JF, Hofheinz R, Arriaga Y, Garcia-Carbonero R, Grothey A, Miriyala A, Kalmus J, Kappeler C, Falcone A, Zaniboni A. PD-012 Analysis of patients ≥75 years in the open-label phase 3b CONSIGN trial of regorafenib in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw200.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
24
|
Wang C, Arriaga Y, Karri S, Verma U, Beg M, Olson C, Anandam J, Abdelnaby A, Balch G, Meyer J. Routine Use of Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy in HIV-Positive Patients With Squamous Cell Anal Cancer: Toxicity and Local Control Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
25
|
Krabbe LM, Westerman ME, Margulis V, Raj GV, Sagalowsky AI, Courtney K, Arriaga Y, Lotan Y. Changing trends in utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Can J Urol 2015; 22:7865-7875. [PMID: 26267024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To reassess use of perioperative chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) following implementation of monthly multidisciplinary meetings to facilitate optimal oncologic treatment. We previously reported from 2003 to 2008 17% of eligible patients with bladder cancer received cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of all patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) between 2008 and 2012 was performed. Information on clinical and pathologic stage, renal function, perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) use and oncologic outcomes was collected. Rationale for utilization decisions was obtained from physician encounter notes. Primary outcome was use of CTX among eligible patients. Secondary measures were type of CTX, pathologic and survival outcomes. RESULTS Among 261 patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer, 162 were eligible for NAC. Overall 40.7% (n = 66) received NAC, and 86.4% were given platinum. Patients given NAC were younger and had more advanced clinical stage. The degree of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (0-3) did not impact likelihood of receiving NAC. NAC patients were more likely to be downstaged to non-muscle-invasive disease (21.2% versus 7.3% p < 0.01) or have a complete pathologic response (12.1% versus 3.1% p = 0.025). Receipt of NAC did not affect oncologic outcomes. Following RC 22.3% of high risk patients (n = 112) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). CONCLUSIONS Our use of cisplatin-based NAC improved from 17% to 35% and overall utilization of NAC increased from 22% to 41%. NAC led to improved pT0 rates and increased pathologic downstaging. The degree of CKD (0-3) did not impact likelihood of receiving NAC. AC use decreased in part due to higher utilization of NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura-Maria Krabbe
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shah SR, Gressett Ussery SM, Dowell JE, Marley E, Liticker J, Arriaga Y, Verma U. Shorter bevacizumab infusions do not increase the incidence of proteinuria and hypertension. Ann Oncol 2012; 24:960-5. [PMID: 23175623 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A previous study has shown that shorter bevacizumab infusions (0.5 mg/kg/min) can be safely administered without increasing the risk of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). However, the risk of proteinuria and hypertension in patients receiving shorter infusions of bevacizumab is undetermined. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study in patients receiving <10 mg/kg of bevacizumab infused over 0.5 mg/kg/min. Patients were observed until discontinuation of bevacizumab for progression of cancer or toxicity. The incidence of hypertension and proteinuria was compared with a prior cohort of patients who had received standard duration infusions of bevacizumab. RESULTS Sixty-three patients received a total of 392 doses of shorter bevacizumab infusions. Nineteen (30.2%) patients experienced proteinuria while receiving bevacizumab. Out of 19 patients, 13 had grade 1 and 6 had grade 2 proteinuria. None of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 proteinuria. Hypertension was reported in 32 (50.8%) patients receiving bevacizumab. Twelve (19%) patients developed grade 3 or greater hypertension on bevacizumab. The incidence of proteinuria and hypertension was 38.3% and 56.6%, respectively, in patients (N = 120, 1347 infusions) receiving standard duration infusions of bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS Shorter bevacizumab infusions (0.5 mg/kg/min) do not increase the risk of proteinuria and hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Shah
- Pharmacy Practice Department, Texas Tech University HSC-School of Pharmacy/VA North Texas Health Care System.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Bevacizumab is the first successful example of targeting the vasculature for the treatment of solid tumors. Although generally well tolerated in combination with different chemotherapy regimens, bevacizumab has side effects that are unique to this class of agents. In this review, we discuss the side effects associated with bevacizumab and potential treatments to ameliorate these toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yull Arriaga
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Raj GV, Karavadia S, Schlomer B, Arriaga Y, Lotan Y, Sagalowsky A, Frenkel E. Contemporary use of perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer 2010; 117:276-82. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2009] [Revised: 01/11/2010] [Accepted: 01/19/2010] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
29
|
Youssef R, Shariat S, Alhalabi F, Bolenz C, Ashfaq R, Arriaga Y, Raj G, Sagalowsky A, Lotan Y. 1021 PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF MULTIPLE BIOMARKERS FOR IMPROVED CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING IN PATIENTS WITH UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA OF THE BLADDER. J Urol 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
30
|
Lucas SM, Svatek RS, Olgin G, Arriaga Y, Kabbani W, Sagalowsky AI, Lotan Y. Conservative management in selected patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma compares favourably with early radical surgery. BJU Int 2008; 102:172-6. [PMID: 18341624 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.07535.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of patients treated for upper tract urothelial carcinoma with either immediate nephroureterectomy (NU) or initial endoscopic management. PATIENTS AND METHODS The treatments of 108 patients (120 renal units) at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups, i.e. those who received immediate NU and those who had conservative initial therapy, which included renal units solely treated with endoscopy with or without delayed NU. Overall and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between the treatment groups. RESULTS There were 48 low-grade tumours, of which 27 (56%) were managed conservatively and 21 (44%) by immediate NU. Seven patients treated conservatively had stage or grade progression and had delayed NU. The mean (sd) DSS at 5 years in patients with low-grade disease was equally good for conservative treatment and immediate NU, at 86.2 (9.1)% vs 87.4 (8.4)% (P = 0.909). There were 68 high-grade tumours, of which 12 (18%) patients had conservative management and 56 (82%) had immediate NU. Among the former, seven of 12 had a solitary kidney and three had bilateral disease. In patients managed endoscopically, four of 30 (13%) required delayed NU. The DSS for the conservative and immediate NU groups were 68.6 (18.6)% vs 75.0 (8.1)% (P = 0.528). CONCLUSION Management with a conservative approach in selected patients provides comparable outcomes to immediate NU in patients with low-grade disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Lucas
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Garcia Paez JM, Claramunt R, Millan I, Valdes M, Arriaga Y, Cordon A, Maestro MA, Rocha A, Refusta S, Ros A, Alvarez L, Jorge-Herrero E. Influence of the suture in the propagation of tears in calf pericardium employed in the construction of cardiac bioprostheses. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2008; 6:55-62. [PMID: 20740447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The tearing of the fibers of biomaterials employed in implants or bioprostheses leads to early the failure of these devices. The purpose of this study was to determine the force necessary to propagate a tear in a biological tissue, calf pericardium, when sutured. We analyzed the outcome of 230 trials. There was a loss of resistance to tearing in samples sutured edge-to-edge as compared to unsutured control samples. This loss was not observed when the suture was preceded by an intact or protective zone. The values corresponding to the tearing force for an overlapping suture, especially when sewn with Gore-Tex(R), were higher than those obtained in controls. This study confirms the deleterious effect of the edge-to-edge suture, which can be minimized by protecting the suture, and the excellent behavior of the overlapping suture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Garcia Paez
- Unidad de Biomateriales, Servicio de Cirugía Experimental, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid - Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Becerra C, Arriaga Y, Chu E. Highlights from: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Chicago, Illinois; June 1–5, 2007. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/s1533-0028(11)70271-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|