1
|
Zhou YX, Hu QC, Zhu YJ, Mu XL, Liu JY, Chen Y. Comparison of trimodality therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy for the survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a population-based analysis. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:422. [PMID: 37822001 PMCID: PMC10566126 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01408-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trimodality therapy (TMT) is a mature alternative to radical cystectomy (RC) for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who seek to preserve their primary bladder or are inoperable due to comorbidities. To date, there has been increasing evidence of the effectiveness of TMT as an alternative to RC. In contrast, no literature has stated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with RC (NAC + RC) compared with TMT. OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare the prognosis between patients receiving TMT and NAC + RC. METHODS The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with T2-4aN0M0 MIBC were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models and Kaplan‒Meier survival curves were used for the survival analysis. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied to determine the differences between the two groups. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival (CSS), and the secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS In total, 1,175 patients with MIBC who underwent TMT (n = 822) or NAC + RC (n = 353) were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. After 1:1 PSM, the final patient sample included 303 pairs. The prognosis of patients receiving NAC + RC was significantly better than that of patients receiving TMT in both unmatched and matched cohorts (5-year CSS: before PSM, 75.4% vs. 50.6%, P < 0.0001; after PSM, 76.3% vs. 49.5%, P < 0.0001; 5-year OS: before PSM, 71.7% vs. 37.4%, P < 0.0001; after PSM, 71.7% vs. 31.4%, P < 0.0001). The survival advantages of NAC + RC remained remarkable in the stratified analysis of most factors after PSM. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that being older than 68 years old, unmarried, grade III/IV, T3-4a stage, and undergoing TMT independently correlated with poor OS. CONCLUSION Thus, in this study, patients with MIBC receiving NAC + RC presented with a better prognosis than those receiving TMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Xin Zhou
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Qian-Cheng Hu
- Gastric Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ya-Juan Zhu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiao-Li Mu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Ji-Yan Liu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| | - Ye Chen
- Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kluger H, Barrett JC, Gainor JF, Hamid O, Hurwitz M, LaVallee T, Moss RA, Zappasodi R, Sullivan RJ, Tawbi H, Sharon E. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) consensus definitions for resistance to combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:jitc-2022-005921. [PMID: 36918224 PMCID: PMC10016305 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy is the standard of care for several cancers and the field continues to advance at a rapid pace, with novel combinations leading to indications in an increasing number of disease settings. Durable responses and long-term survival with immunotherapy have been demonstrated in some patients, though lack of initial benefit and recurrence after extended disease control remain major hurdles for the field. Many new combination regimens are in development for patients whose disease progressed on initial immunotherapy. To guide clinical trial design and support analyses of emerging molecular and cellular data surrounding mechanisms of resistance, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) previously generated consensus clinical definitions for resistance to single-agent anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in three distinct scenarios: primary resistance, secondary resistance, and progression after treatment discontinuation. An unmet need still exists, however, for definitions of resistance to ICI-based combinations, which represent an expanding frontier in the immunotherapy treatment landscape. In 2021, SITC convened a workshop including stakeholders from academia, industry, and government to develop consensus definitions for resistance to ICI-based combination regimens for improved outcome assessment, trial design and drug development. This manuscript reports the minimum drug exposure requirements and time frame for progression that define resistance in both the metastatic setting and the perioperative setting, as well as key caveats and areas for future research with ICI/ICI combinations. Definitions for resistance to ICIs in combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapy will be published in companion volumes to this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J Carl Barrett
- Translational Medical Oncology, AstraZeneca, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | - Roberta Zappasodi
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Immunology and Microbial Pathogenesis Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, New York, USA
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Hussein Tawbi
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elad Sharon
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Atkins MB, Ascierto PA, Feltquate D, Gulley JL, Johnson DB, Khushalani NI, Sosman J, Yap TA, Kluger H, Sullivan RJ, Tawbi H. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) consensus definitions for resistance to combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with targeted therapies. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:jitc-2022-005923. [PMID: 36918225 PMCID: PMC10016252 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy offers deep and durable disease control to some patients, but many tumors do not respond to treatment with single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). One strategy to enhance responses to immunotherapy is via combinations with signal transduction inhibitors, such as antiangiogenic therapies, which not only directly target cancer cells but also could potentially favorably modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. Combination strategies with ICIs have demonstrated enhanced antitumor activity compared with tumor-targeted or antiangiogenic therapy alone in randomized trials in a variety of solid tumor settings, leading to regulatory approval from the US Food and Drug Administration and agencies in other countries for the treatment of endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite improved survival and response rates for some patients when antiangiogenic or targeted therapies are administered with ICIs, many patients continue to progress after combination treatment and urgently need new strategies to address this manifestation of resistance to immunotherapy. Previously, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) published consensus definitions for resistance to single-agent anti-PD-(L)1. To provide guidance for clinical trial design and to support analyses of emerging molecular and immune profiling data surrounding mechanisms of resistance to ICI-based combinations, SITC convened a follow-up workshop in 2021 to develop consensus definitions for resistance to multiagent ICI combinations. This manuscript reports the consensus clinical definitions for combinations of anti-PD-(L)1 ICIs and targeted therapies. Definitions for resistance to ICIs in combination with chemotherapy and with other ICIs will be published in companion volumes to this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Timonthy A Yap
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Hussein Tawbi
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Makrakis D, Talukder R, Diamantopoulos LN, Carril-Ajuria L, Castellano D, De Kouchkovsky I, Koshkin VS, Park JJ, Alva A, Bilen MA, Stewart TF, McKay RR, Santos VS, Agarwal N, Jain J, Zakharia Y, Morales-Barrera R, Devitt ME, Grant M, Lythgoe MP, Pinato DJ, Nelson A, Hoimes CJ, Shreck E, Gartrell BA, Sankin A, Tripathi A, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Murgic J, Fröbe A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Drakaki A, Liu S, Kumar V, Di Lorenzo G, Joshi M, Isaacsson-Velho P, Buznego LA, Duran I, Moses M, Barata P, Sonpavde G, Yu EY, Wright JL, Grivas P, Khaki AR. Association of prior local therapy and outcomes with programmed-death ligand-1 inhibitors in advanced urothelial cancer. BJU Int 2022; 130:592-603. [PMID: 34597472 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare clinical outcomes with programmed-death ligand-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have vs have not undergone radical surgery (RS) or radiation therapy (RT) prior to developing metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment and outcomes data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs across 25 institutions. We compared outcomes (observed response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS]) between patients with vs without prior RS, and by type of prior locoregional treatment (RS vs RT vs no locoregional treatment). Patients with de novo advanced disease were excluded. Analysis was stratified by treatment line (first-line and second-line or greater [second-plus line]). Logistic regression was used to compare ORR, while Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used for PFS and OS. Multivariable models were adjusted for known prognostic factors. RESULTS We included 562 patients (first-line: 342 and second-plus line: 220). There was no difference in outcomes based on prior locoregional treatment among those treated with first-line ICIs. In the second-plus-line setting, prior RS was associated with higher ORR (adjusted odds ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.19-5.74]), longer OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.88) and PFS (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.89) vs no prior RS. This association remained significant when type of prior locoregional treatment (RS and RT) was modelled separately. CONCLUSION Prior RS before developing advanced disease was associated with better outcomes in patients with aUC treated with ICIs in the second-plus-line but not in the first-line setting. While further validation is needed, our findings could have implications for prognostic estimates in clinical discussions and benchmarking for clinical trials. Limitations include the study's retrospective nature, lack of randomization, and possible selection and confounding biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Makrakis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Lucia Carril-Ajuria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivan De Kouchkovsky
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joseph J Park
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ajjai Alva
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Victor S Santos
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jayanshu Jain
- Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael E Devitt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Michael Grant
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mark P Lythgoe
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ariel Nelson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Christopher J Hoimes
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Evan Shreck
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin A Gartrell
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Alex Sankin
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Jure Murgic
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Fröbe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.,School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sandy Liu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Monika Joshi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Pedro Isaacsson-Velho
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Oncology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Marcus Moses
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Pedro Barata
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Genitourinary Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaleem M, Dalhat MH, Azmi L, Asar TO, Ahmad W, Alghanmi M, Almostadi A, Zughaibi TA, Tabrez S. An Insight into Molecular Targets of Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231911687. [PMID: 36232989 PMCID: PMC9569595 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis is one of the major reasons of death in breast cancer (BC) patients, significantly affecting the quality of life, physical activity, and interdependence on several individuals. There is no clear evidence in scientific literature that depicts an exact mechanism relating to brain metastasis in BC patients. The tendency to develop breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) differs by the BC subtype, varying from almost half with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (HER2- ER- PR-), one-third with HER2+ (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and around one-tenth with luminal subclass (ER+ (estrogen positive) or PR+ (progesterone positive)) breast cancer. This review focuses on the molecular pathways as possible therapeutic targets of BCBMs and their potent drugs under different stages of clinical trial. In view of increased numbers of clinical trials and systemic studies, the scientific community is hopeful of unraveling the underlying mechanisms of BCBMs that will help in designing an effective treatment regimen with multiple molecular targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Kaleem
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Dadasaheb Balpande College of Pharmacy, Nagpur 440037, India
| | - Mahmood Hassan Dalhat
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Lubna Azmi
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226031, India
| | - Turky Omar Asar
- Department of Biology, College of Science and Arts at Alkamil, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 23218, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wasim Ahmad
- Department of Kuliyate Tib, National Institute of Unani Medicine, Kottigepalya, Bengaluru 560091, India
| | - Maimonah Alghanmi
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- Vaccines and Immunotherapy Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amal Almostadi
- King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Torki A. Zughaibi
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shams Tabrez
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barone B, Calogero A, Scafuri L, Ferro M, Lucarelli G, Di Zazzo E, Sicignano E, Falcone A, Romano L, De Luca L, Oliva F, Mirto BF, Capone F, Imbimbo C, Crocetto F. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as a Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Treatment of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102545. [PMID: PMID: 35626149 PMCID: PMC9139497 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, a novel class of immunotherapy drugs that restore natural antitumoral immune activity, have been applied to improve the overall survival and to reduce the morbidity and mortality of bladder cancer both in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. However, some patients do not respond to checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, the capability for identifying patients eligible for this type of immunotherapy represent one of the efforts of ongoing studies. We aim to summarize the most recent evidence on immune checkpoint inhibitors in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Abstract Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer worldwide. Over 75% of non-muscle invasive cancer patients require conservative local treatment, while the remaining 25% of patients undergo radical cystectomy or radiotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors represent a novel class of immunotherapy drugs that restore natural antitumoral immune activity via the blockage of inhibitory receptors and ligands expressed on antigen-presenting cells, T lymphocytes and tumour cells. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in bladder cancer has been expanded from the neoadjuvant setting, i.e., after radical cystectomy, to the adjuvant setting, i.e., before the operative time or chemotherapy, in order to improve the overall survival and to reduce the morbidity and mortality of both the disease and its treatment. However, some patients do not respond to checkpoint inhibitors. As result, the capability for identifying patients that are eligible for this immunotherapy represent one of the efforts of ongoing studies. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the most recent evidence regarding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, in a neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biagio Barone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (B.B.); (E.S.); (A.F.); (L.R.); (L.D.L.); (B.F.M.); (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Armando Calogero
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy;
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Xerencia de Xestión Integrada de Santiago (XXIS/SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Luca Scafuri
- Oncology Unit, Hospital ‘Andrea Tortora,’ ASL Salerno, 84016 Pagani, Italy;
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Milan, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Erika Di Zazzo
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Enrico Sicignano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (B.B.); (E.S.); (A.F.); (L.R.); (L.D.L.); (B.F.M.); (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Alfonso Falcone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (B.B.); (E.S.); (A.F.); (L.R.); (L.D.L.); (B.F.M.); (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Lorenzo Romano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (B.B.); (E.S.); (A.F.); (L.R.); (L.D.L.); (B.F.M.); (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Luigi De Luca
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (B.B.); (E.S.); (A.F.); (L.R.); (L.D.L.); (B.F.M.); (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Francesco Oliva
- Department of Urology, Policlinico di Abano, 35031 Abano Terme, Italy;
| | - Benito Fabio Mirto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (B.B.); (E.S.); (A.F.); (L.R.); (L.D.L.); (B.F.M.); (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Federico Capone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (B.B.); (E.S.); (A.F.); (L.R.); (L.D.L.); (B.F.M.); (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (B.B.); (E.S.); (A.F.); (L.R.); (L.D.L.); (B.F.M.); (F.C.); (C.I.)
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (B.B.); (E.S.); (A.F.); (L.R.); (L.D.L.); (B.F.M.); (F.C.); (C.I.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) carries a poor prognosis with a 5-year overall survival rate of 40-50%. For localized disease, radical treatment options are cystectomy or radiotherapy with or without a radiosensitiser. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is often delivered in addition to either. Metastatic disease can be treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Standard clinicopathological information is insufficient to guide treatment decisions in several clinical scenarios in MIBC and there has been substantial effort to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Despite this, no biomarker has been sufficiently qualified in prospective clinical trials to justify routine use. In this chapter we discuss these biomarkers and provide insight into the significant unmet need for robust biomarkers to inform treatment decisions and ultimately improve outcomes for bladder cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Wilson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Nuradh Joseph
- Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka; Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
9
|
Rebuzzi SE, Banna GL, Murianni V, Damassi A, Giunta EF, Fraggetta F, De Giorgi U, Cathomas R, Rescigno P, Brunelli M, Fornarini G. Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of the Current Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5517. [PMID: 34771680 PMCID: PMC8583566 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, the treatment landscape of urothelial carcinoma has significantly changed due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are the standard of care for second-line treatment and first-line platinum-ineligible patients with advanced disease. Despite the overall survival improvement, only a minority of patients benefit from this immunotherapy. Therefore, there is an unmet need to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers or models to select patients who will benefit from ICIs, especially in view of novel therapeutic agents. This review describes the prognostic and predictive role, and clinical readiness, of clinical and tumour factors, including new molecular classes, tumour mutational burden, mutational signatures, circulating tumour DNA, programmed death-ligand 1, inflammatory indices and clinical characteristics for patients with urothelial cancer treated with ICIs. A classification of these factors according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation currently indicates both a prognostic and predictive value for ctDNA and a prognostic relevance only for concomitant medications and patients' characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Elena Rebuzzi
- Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, 17100 Savona, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | | | - Veronica Murianni
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (V.M.); (G.F.)
| | - Alessandra Damassi
- Academic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy;
| | - Emilio Francesco Giunta
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università Degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | | | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, 7000 Chur, Switzerland;
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Interdisciplinary Group for Translational Research and Clinical Trials, Urogenital Cancers GIRT-Uro, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Turin, Italy;
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Fornarini
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (V.M.); (G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rhea LP, Aragon-Ching JB. Advances and Controversies With Checkpoint Inhibitors in Bladder Cancer. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY 2021; 15:11795549211044963. [PMID: 34602833 PMCID: PMC8481722 DOI: 10.1177/11795549211044963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of bladder urothelial cancers and have wide application in almost all disease states. Although several drugs have initially been shown to be beneficial in the second-line metastatic setting, there are still ongoing controversies and debate, including voluntary withdrawals of durvalumab and atezolizumab, along with the approval of agents in the first-line setting in the cisplatin-ineligible state based on inconsistent confirmatory phase III trials. As novel immunotherapy drugs are discovered and studied in various phases of clinical trials, these agents will continue to change the treatment landscape for bladder cancer patients. This review will discuss current available evidence and information and key pivotal trials using checkpoint inhibitors in bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan P Rhea
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nelson BE, Hong A, Jana B. Elucidation of Novel Molecular Targets for Therapeutic Strategies in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Literature Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:705294. [PMID: 34422659 PMCID: PMC8374860 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.705294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma therapy is a rapidly evolving and expanding field. Traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens have not produced optimal long-term outcomes, and many urothelial cancer patients have comorbidities that disqualify them as chemotherapy candidates. In recent years, a plethora of novel therapeutic agents that target diverse molecular pathways has emerged as alternative treatment modalities for not only metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but also for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in adjuvant and definitive settings. This review paper aims to discuss the various categories of therapeutic agents for these different types of urothelial cancer, discussing immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, kinase inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, peptide vaccination, and other drugs targeting pathways such as angiogenesis, DNA synthesis, mTOR/PI3K/AKT, and EGFR/HER-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blessie Elizabeth Nelson
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Angelina Hong
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Bagi Jana
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Galsky MD, Hoimes CJ, Necchi A, Shore N, Witjes JA, Steinberg G, Bedke J, Nishiyama H, Fang X, Kataria R, Sbar E, Jia X, Siefker-Radtke A. Perioperative pembrolizumab therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Phase III KEYNOTE-866 and KEYNOTE-905/EV-303. Future Oncol 2021; 17:3137-3150. [PMID: 34008425 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with high rates of recurrence and poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy (RC) improves outcomes in cisplatin-eligible patients; however, the improvement in overall survival is modest. Standard of care for cisplatin-ineligible patients remains RC; more effective systemic therapies are needed. Recent Phase Ib/II studies suggest pembrolizumab monotherapy and combination therapy are effective neoadjuvant therapies for MIBC. The randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-866 and KEYNOTE-905/EV-303 studies are being conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of perioperative pembrolizumab or placebo with chemotherapy in cisplatin-eligible patients with MIBC (KEYNOTE-866) and of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin versus RC plus pelvic lymph node dissection alone in cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC (KEYNOTE-905/EV-303). Clinical trial registration: NCT03924856 & NCT03924895 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Galsky
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY 10029, USA
| | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University & IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Neal Shore
- Department of Urology, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC 29577, USA
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University, Nijmegen Heyendaal 6500, The Netherlands
| | - Gary Steinberg
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, NY 10017, USA
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, 72076, Germany
| | | | - Xiao Fang
- Department of Clinical Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Ritesh Kataria
- Department of Clinical Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Eric Sbar
- Department of Clinical Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Xieyang Jia
- Department of Clinical Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Arlene Siefker-Radtke
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Galsky MD, Balar AV, Black PC, Campbell MT, Dykstra GS, Grivas P, Gupta S, Hoimes CJ, Lopez LP, Meeks JJ, Plimack ER, Rosenberg JE, Shore N, Steinberg GD, Kamat AM. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of urothelial cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:e002552. [PMID: 34266883 PMCID: PMC8286774 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A number of immunotherapies have been developed and adopted for the treatment of urothelial cancer (encompassing cancers arising from the bladder, urethra, or renal pelvis). For these immunotherapies to positively impact patient outcomes, optimal selection of agents and treatment scheduling, especially in conjunction with existing treatment paradigms, is paramount. Immunotherapies also warrant specific and unique considerations regarding patient management, emphasizing both the prompt identification and treatment of potential toxicities. In order to address these issues, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts in the field of immunotherapy for urothelial cancer. The expert panel developed this clinical practice guideline (CPG) to inform healthcare professionals on important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for urothelial cancer, including diagnostic testing, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Arjun V Balar
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matthew T Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gail S Dykstra
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Dykstra Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christoper J Hoimes
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lidia P Lopez
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joshua J Meeks
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- The Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Plimack
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Deparment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology and Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology under Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mar N, Kalebasty AR. Adjuvant pembrolizumab in genomically selected high-risk patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2021; 27:2053-2056. [PMID: 34013824 DOI: 10.1177/10781552211016526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer post neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy with pathologic advanced disease (ypT3, ypT4, ypN+) at radical cystectomy have a significantly worse five-year overall survival. There is currently no preferred adjuvant therapy to reduce risk of cancer recurrence in this high-risk patient cohort and surveillance remains the standard-of-care. CASE REPORT We present a case series of two patients who received cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had pathologic node-positive urothelial carcinoma at the time of radical cystectomy. Tumor next generation sequencing revealed high mutational burden in both patients and positive PD-L1 in one patient.Management and outcome: Patients were treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab and experienced long-term disease free intervals. DISCUSSION Use of adjuvant checkpoint inhibitors in patients post neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy with pathologic advanced disease at the time of radical cystectomy at high-risk of cancer recurrence sounds appealing. Careful patient selection based on tumor-specific genomic alterations may be key. Large trials addressing this question are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nataliya Mar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, 8788University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Santopietro AL, Einstein D, Bellmunt J. Advances in the management of urothelial carcinoma: is immunotherapy the answer? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22:1743-1759. [PMID: 33905290 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1921149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the second most common malignancy of the genitourinary system in the US, but mortality rate has not significantly improved despite advances in therapy. Over the past few years, the treatment landscape of non-muscle-invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic UC (mUC) has evolved with the advent of immunotherapy.Areas covered: This paper summarizes current data and ongoing research into the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in various settings of UC, including as maintenance therapy in chemotherapy-responsive mUC (with recent approval for avelumab in this setting) and as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies in localized and non-muscle-invasive disease. In addition, the authors review the combination of ICIs with chemotherapy, radiation and targeted therapies in an effort to increase response durability and efficacy.Expert opinion: While there has been a rapid expansion in clinical trials, platinum-based chemotherapy remains standard treatment in perioperative and first-line metastatic UC. The identification of biomarkers that can identify patients who will respond to ICIs has yielded conflicting results and has been largely non-generalizable to clinical practice. Further research into novel strategies and combinations with ICIs is needed to better characterize the role of immunotherapy in UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Einstein
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ravi P, Pond GR, Diamantopoulos LN, Su C, Alva A, Jain RK, Skelton WP, Gupta S, Tward JD, Olson KM, Singh P, Grunewald CM, Niegisch G, Lee JL, Gallina A, Bandini M, Necchi A, Mossanen M, McGregor BA, Curran C, Grivas P, Sonpavde GP. Optimal pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from a global, multicentre collaboration. BJU Int 2021; 128:607-614. [PMID: 33909949 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate outcomes of patients achieving a post-treatment pathological stage of <ypT2N0 at radical cystectomy (RC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) to identify an optimal definition of pathological response. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients from 10 international centres who underwent NAC for cT2-4aN0-1 MIBC and achieved <ypT2N0 disease at RC were included. The primary outcome was time to recurrence, either local or distant. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate associations between clinicopathological variables and outcomes. RESULTS A total of 625 patients were included. The median age was 66 years and 80% were male. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC, 56%) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC)/dose-dense (dd)MVAC (32%) were the most common NAC regimens. ypT0, pure ypTis, ypTa ±ypTis and ypT1 ± ypTis were attained in 58.1%, 20.0%, 7.6% and 14.2% of patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence of recurrence at 5 years was 9%, 16%, 29% and 30%, respectively. Pathological stage was prognostic for recurrence, with ypTa ± Tis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-7.30) and ypT1 ± Tis disease (HR 4.03, 95% CI 2.13-7.63) associated with a significantly higher recurrence risk. Pure ypTis (HR 1.66, 95% CI 0.82-3.38) and the type of NAC regimen (ddMVAC: HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.55-4.56; MVAC: HR 1.18, 9%% CI 0.25-5.54; reference: GC) were not associated with recurrence. CONCLUSION We propose that optimal pathological response after NAC be defined as attainment of ypT0N0/ypTisN0 at RC. Patients with ypTaN0 or ypT1N0 disease (with or without Tis) at RC displayed a significantly higher risk of recurrence and may be candidates for trials investigating adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praful Ravi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leonidas N Diamantopoulos
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,University of Pittsburg Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Ajjai Alva
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Sumati Gupta
- University of Utah's Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jonathan D Tward
- University of Utah's Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Camilla M Grunewald
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Guenter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthew Mossanen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Golijanin B, Gershman B, De Souza A, Kott O, Carneiro BA, Mega A, Golijanin DJ, Amin A. p53 Expression, Programmed Death Ligand 1, and Risk Factors in Urinary Tract Small Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:651754. [PMID: 33968753 PMCID: PMC8101844 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.651754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Small cell carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCCUT) is a rare finding with poor clinical course. This study sheds light on the molecular subtype and identifies risk factors in patients diagnosed with SCCUT. Methods: Immunohistochemical expression of immunotherapy target programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and luminal (GATA3), basal (p63), and p53 markers are assessed in patients diagnosed with SCCUT. Univariate analysis identified risk factors. Overall survival (OS) is computed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Tissue was available for 70.2% (33/47). All showed a high PD-L1 expression phenotype. p53 is seen in 93.9% (31/33), mostly as overexpression, GATA3 in 45.5% (15/33), and p63 in 57.6% (19/33). For the entire cohort (n = 47), 1-year survival was 59.6%, and the median OS was 17 months. Univariate analysis shows that chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.14–0.61, p = 0.001], radical surgery (HR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.18–0.76, p = 0.007), and diagnosis of non-pure SCCUT (HR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.22–0.86, p = 0.02) are favorable prognostic features. Metastasis had negative associations with survival (HR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1–4.2, p = 0.03). Conclusions: In this series, pure and mixed SCCUT are characterized by p53 overexpression and a high PD-L1 phenotype. Histology of non-pure SCCUT is a positive prognosticator, and radical cystectomy or chemotherapy can improve OS. These findings demonstrate that SCCUT may be eligible for PD-L1 immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borivoj Golijanin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Urology Department, Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andre De Souza
- Oncology Department, Lifespan Cancer Institute, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ohad Kott
- Urology Department, Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Benedito A Carneiro
- Oncology Department, Lifespan Cancer Institute, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Anthony Mega
- Oncology Department, Lifespan Cancer Institute, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Dragan J Golijanin
- Urology Department, Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ali Amin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ma J, Black PC. Current Perioperative Therapy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2021; 35:495-511. [PMID: 33958147 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Radical cystectomy is curative in only approximately 50% of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although perioperative radiotherapy has been tested with the intent of improving locoregional disease control, there currently is no role for this modality in routine care. Perioperative systemic therapy is used with the intent of reducing the risk of systemic recurrence. Robust trial evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with adjuvant chemotherapy offered as an alternative if neoadjuvant therapy is not administered. Perioperative immunotherapy represents the next frontier in perioperative therapy. Further biomarker development is required to guide treatment in individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Ma
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bailey C, Black JRM, Reading JL, Litchfield K, Turajlic S, McGranahan N, Jamal-Hanjani M, Swanton C. Tracking Cancer Evolution through the Disease Course. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:916-932. [PMID: 33811124 PMCID: PMC7611362 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
During cancer evolution, constituent tumor cells compete under dynamic selection pressures. Phenotypic variation can be observed as intratumor heterogeneity, which is propagated by genome instability leading to mutations, somatic copy-number alterations, and epigenomic changes. TRACERx was set up in 2014 to observe the relationship between intratumor heterogeneity and patient outcome. By integrating multiregion sequencing of primary tumors with longitudinal sampling of a prospectively recruited patient cohort, cancer evolution can be tracked from early- to late-stage disease and through therapy. Here we review some of the key features of the studies and look to the future of the field. SIGNIFICANCE: Cancers evolve and adapt to environmental challenges such as immune surveillance and treatment pressures. The TRACERx studies track cancer evolution in a clinical setting, through primary disease to recurrence. Through multiregion and longitudinal sampling, evolutionary processes have been detailed in the tumor and the immune microenvironment in non-small cell lung cancer and clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. TRACERx has revealed the potential therapeutic utility of targeting clonal neoantigens and ctDNA detection in the adjuvant setting as a minimal residual disease detection tool primed for translation into clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Bailey
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - James R M Black
- Cancer Genome Evolution Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - James L Reading
- Research Department of Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kevin Litchfield
- The Tumour Immunogenomics and Immunosurveillance (TIGI) Lab, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Nicholas McGranahan
- Cancer Genome Evolution Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mariam Jamal-Hanjani
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Necchi A, de Jong JJ, Raggi D, Briganti A, Marandino L, Gallina A, Bandini M, Dabbas B, Davicioni E, Capitanio U, Montorsi F, Seiler R, Wright JL, Lotan Y, Black PC, Gibb EA. Molecular Characterization of Residual Bladder Cancer after Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab. Eur Urol 2021; 80:149-159. [PMID: 33785257 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC), molecular alterations in immunotherapy-resistant tumors found at radical cystectomy (RC) remain largely unstudied. OBJECTIVE To investigate the biology of pembrolizumab-resistant tumors in comparison to an RC cohort treated without any systemic therapy and a cohort of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)-treated tumors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Transcriptome-wide expression profiling was performed on 26 RC samples from patients with ypT2-4 disease after pembrolizumab treatment, of which 22 had matched pretherapy samples. Unsupervised consensus clustering (CC) was performed to compare 26 post-pembrolizumab samples with 94 RC samples without neoadjuvant treatment and 21 samples collected from the former tumor bed of NAC-treated patients (scar tissue). Clusters were investigated for their biological and clinical characteristics and were compared to a cohort of post-NAC tumors (n = 133). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between subgroups using χ2 tests and two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Molecular subtyping of pre- and post-pembrolizumab samples revealed significant differences: only 36% of samples had a concordant subtype according to the consensus classifier. Unsupervised CC revealed three distinct post-pembrolizumab clusters (basal, luminal, and scar-like). A scar-like subtype was present in 50% of the post-pembrolizumab cases (n = 13) and expressed genes associated with wound healing/scarring. This subtype had higher luminal marker expression in the post-pembrolizumab setting compared to CC scar-like tumors from the other cohorts. Patients with the scar-like subtype showed favorable prognosis after systemic therapy, but not in the RC-only setting. The small numbers in each subgroup represents the major study limitation. CONCLUSIONS This study expands our understanding of the biology of pembrolizumab-resistant MIBC and provides a framework for defining molecular subtypes after treatment. The results further support the hypothesis that luminal-type tumors may be resistant to immunotherapy or that this treatment may select for, or induce, a luminal phenotype. PATIENT SUMMARY We carried out genetic analysis for bladder cancer tumors from patients who had received an immunotherapy agent called pembrolizumab and compared them to tumors treated with standard chemotherapy or just bladder removal. We found differences in gene expression between the treatment types and between tumor tissue from the same patient before and after treatment. These results may be helpful in personalizing therapy strategies for patients with bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Joep J de Jong
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roland Seiler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ewan A Gibb
- Decipher Biosciences Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lopez-Beltran A, López-Rios F, Montironi R, Wildsmith S, Eckstein M. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Urothelial Carcinoma: Recommendations for Practical Approaches to PD-L1 and Other Potential Predictive Biomarker Testing. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061424. [PMID: 33804698 PMCID: PMC8003923 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The predominant histologic type of bladder cancer is urothelial carcinoma (UC). Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels in UC tumors help clinicians determine which patients are more likely to respond to immuno-oncology (IO) therapies; as such, the harmonization of PD-L1 testing in evaluating patients is increasingly important. A series of international workshops, involving renowned pathologists and oncologists, were held to develop best practice approaches to PD-L1 testing in UC. It was agreed that robust control of analytical standards is required to obtain quality PD-L1 results and that interpretation and reporting of PD-L1 require clear inter-clinician communication. Recommendations for the best practices for PD-L1 testing in UC are provided. A PD-L1 test request form for pathology laboratories was also developed and included here, encouraging communication between clinicians and pathologists, and ensuring fast and high-quality test results. Novel biomarkers being evaluated for immuno-oncology agents in UC are also briefly discussed. Abstract Immuno-oncology (IO) agents (anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and anti–programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)) are approved as first- and second-line treatments for metastatic UC. PD-L1 expression levels in UC tumors help clinicians determine which patients are more likely to respond to IO therapies. Assays for approved IO agents use different antibodies, immunohistochemical protocols, cutoffs (defining “high” vs. “low” PD-L1 expression), and scoring algorithms. The robust control of pre-analytical and analytical standards is needed to obtain high-quality PD-L1 results. To better understand the status and perspectives of biomarker-guided patient selection for anti–PD-1 and anti–PD-L1 agents in UC, three workshops were held from December 2018 to December 2019 in Italy, Malaysia, and Spain. The primary goal was to develop recommendations for best practice approaches to PD-L1 testing in UC. Recommendations pertaining to the interpretation and reporting of the results of PD-L1 assays from experienced pathologists and oncologists from around the globe are included. A test request form for pathology laboratories was developed as a critical first step for oncologists/urologists to encourage communication between clinicians and pathologists, ensuring fast and high-quality test results. In this era of personalized medicine, we briefly discuss novel biomarkers being evaluated for IO agents in UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Lopez-Beltran
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cordoba University, 14004 Cordoba, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Champalimaud Clinical Center, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal
- Correspondence: or
| | - Fernando López-Rios
- Pathology-Targeted Therapies Laboratory, HM Hospitales, 28050 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- School of Medicine, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region (Ancona), 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | | | - Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Following platinum-based regimens becoming the reference standard of care, it has taken almost four decades to find a systemic treatment that improved overall survival in metastatic urothelial tumors. Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors have not only improved overall survival but also the quality of life of patients with metastatic urothelial tumors after failure of platinum-based regimens and as a maintenance therapy after four to six cycles of standard first-line chemotherapy. In addition, very promising data are emerging when single-agent immunotherapy is offered as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for patients with muscle-invasive disease and also in the non-muscle-invasive setting. There is an extensive debate about the role of PD-L1 expression as a reliable biomarker to predict the activity of immune-based regimens. Furthermore, the lack of consensus concerning its utility means that there is a need for more and better tools to identify patients who are likely to benefit from these novel approaches. The field of urothelial tumors now additionally exploits novel antibody-drug conjugates and fibroblast growth factor-receptor inhibitors that are being tested in combination with immunotherapy. This added complexity contributes to an enormous increase in the challenges that will be faced shortly.
Collapse
|
23
|
Biomarker-Oriented Therapy in Bladder and Renal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22062832. [PMID: 33799514 PMCID: PMC7999814 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22062832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder or renal cancer has changed significantly during recent years and efforts towards biomarker-directed therapy are being investigated. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) or fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) directed therapy are being evaluated for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients, as well as muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. Meanwhile, efforts to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are still ongoing, and genomic biomarkers are being evaluated in prospective clinical trials. Currently, patients with metastatic UC (mUC) are usually treated with second-line ICI, while cisplatin-ineligible patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive tumors can benefit from first-line ICI. Platinum-relapsed UC patients harboring FGFR2/3 mutations can be treated with erdafitinib, while enfortumab vedotin has emerged as a novel third-line treatment option for mUC. In metastatic (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), ICI was first introduced as second-line treatment after vascular endothelial growth factor receptor—tyrosine kinase inhibition (VEGFR-TKI). Currently, ICIs have also been introduced as first-line treatment in metastatic RCC. Although there is no evidence up to now for beneficial adjuvant treatment after surgery with VEGFR-TKIs in high-risk non-metastatic RCC, several trials are underway investigating the potential beneficial effect of ICIs in this setting.
Collapse
|
24
|
Tripathi A, Khaki AR, Grivas P. Perioperative Immunotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:131-133. [PMID: 33642222 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have already been approved for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma and are now being investigated for perioperative treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Ongoing trials are assessing ICIs as monotherapy and in combination with other treatments. Early data are promising, and long-term survival data are awaited to confirm the potential of ICIs in MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Tripathi
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology Oncology, University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Management of Clinically Regional Node-Positive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:24. [PMID: 33559760 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01018-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Clinically regional node-positive (cN+) urothelial carcinoma of the bladder requires a multi-modal management approach amidst growing recognition that it represents a spectrum of disease. Herein, we review the contemporary evidence for the natural history, evaluation, and management of clinically regional node-positive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, highlighting recent changes in lymph node staging. RECENT FINDINGS Despite advances in techniques, cross-sectional imaging remains relatively insensitive for the detection of lymph node metastases. Recent changes to nodal staging that distinguish between cN1, cN2-3, and non-regional lymph node metastases reflect an increasing understanding that node-positive disease is heterogeneous and its management must be individualized according to nodal staging. Systemic therapy remains the initial management strategy, either alone or in conjunction with radiotherapy, with choice and sequencing of agents extrapolated from studies of metastatic disease. Consolidative radical cystectomy is an option for patients with disease response to upfront systemic therapy, and several series demonstrate a subset of patients with favorable oncologic outcomes. The comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy and radical cystectomy as local therapy remains an important evidence gap. Future studies that identify predictive biomarkers will help inform optimal choice of systemic therapy. The management of clinically regional node-positive disease requires a multimodal approach comprising both systemic and local therapy, tailored to the patient and to disease response. While choice of systemic therapy will be informed by ongoing studies in patients with metastatic disease, including the elucidation of predictive biomarkers, the comparative effectiveness of local therapies remains an important evidence gap.
Collapse
|
26
|
Rhea LP, Mendez-Marti S, Kim D, Aragon-Ching JB. Role of immunotherapy in bladder cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 26:100296. [PMID: 33421822 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The role of immunotherapy in bladder urothelial cancers is rapidly expanding. Since the initial second-line therapy approval for patients who fail prior platinum-based chemotherapy, the use of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has been rapidly evolving. There are approved indications for first-line metastatic disease in the platinum-ineligible patients or the cisplatin-ineligible PD-L1 positive patients, and there is a label for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are BCG-refractory. In addition, a trial on maintenance immunotherapy with avelumab showed positive findings with improvement in overall survival that has also changed standard of care for these patients. There are ongoing clinical trials evaluating its use in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant perioperative muscle-invasive bladder cancer setting. The pivotal trials that led to these FDA approvals and promising and ongoing trials are discussed herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan P Rhea
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Car
| | | | - Davis Kim
- Virginia Commonwealth University Medical School
| | - Jeanny B Aragon-Ching
- Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rey-Cárdenas M, Guerrero-Ramos F, Gómez de Liaño Lista A, Carretero-González A, Bote H, Herrera-Juárez M, Carril-Ajuria L, Martín-Soberón M, Sepulveda JM, Billalabeitia EG, Castellano D, de Velasco G. Recent advances in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for urothelial bladder cancer: What to expect in the near future. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 93:102142. [PMID: 33453566 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Urothelial bladder cancer (UC) is the most common malignancy involving the urinary system and represents a significant health problem. Immunotherapy has been used for decades for UC with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) set as the standard of care for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has completely transformed the treatment landscape of bladder cancer enabling to expand the treatment strategies. Novel ICIs have successfully shown improved outcomes on metastatic disease to such an extent that the standard of care paradigm has changed leading to the development of different trials with the aim of determining whether ICIs may have a role in early disease. The localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) scenario remains challenging since the recurrence rate continues to be high despite all therapeutic efforts. This article will review the current experience of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting of UC, the clinical trials landscape and finally, an insight of what to expect in the immediate and mid-term future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rey-Cárdenas
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - F Guerrero-Ramos
- Urology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - A Gómez de Liaño Lista
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil, Canary Islands, Avda. Marítima del Sur, s/n, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
| | - A Carretero-González
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - H Bote
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - M Herrera-Juárez
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - L Carril-Ajuria
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - M Martín-Soberón
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - J M Sepulveda
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - E G Billalabeitia
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| | - G de Velasco
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ravindranathan D, Alhalabi O, Rafei H, Shah AY, Bilen MA. Landscape of Immunotherapy in Genitourinary Malignancies. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021; 1342:143-192. [PMID: 34972965 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-79308-1_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The past decade has witnessed a revolution in the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of multiple tumor types, including genitourinary cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have notably improved the treatment outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In prostate cancer, the role of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is not yet established except for microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) tumors. Other immunotherapeutic approaches that have been explored in these malignancies include cytokines, vaccines, and cellular therapy. Ongoing studies are exploring the use of immunotherapy combinations as well as combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapy in these types of tumors. The use of immunotherapy beyond the metastatic setting is an active area of research. Moreover, there is great interest in biomarker development to predict response to immunotherapy and risk of toxicity. This book chapter is a comprehensive review of immunotherapeutic approaches, both approved and investigational, for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Ravindranathan
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Omar Alhalabi
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hind Rafei
- Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amishi Yogesh Shah
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Mehmet Asim Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Krebs M, Sokolakis I, Seiler R, Daneshmand S, Grivas P, Gakis G. Adjuvant Treatment of Residual Disease Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2020. [DOI: 10.3233/blc-200341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has shown overall survival benefit for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In contrast, there is limited data for adjuvant treatment options in patients with residual muscle invasive disease after NAC followed by radical cystectomy (RC). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to give an overview of studies examining adjuvant treatment options for patients with residual MIBC at RC despite NAC. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed database and Clinicaltrials.gov (end point August 2019) for publications and registered trials combining NAC, RC, and adjuvant treatment options. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates, 659 articles and registered trials were further analyzed. Finally, 10 studies and 7 registered clinical trials met inclusion criteria. While 5 publications did not further characterize NAC and adjuvant regimens, the remaining 5 studies reported mainly platinum-based regimens. Altogether, the selected studies showed conflicting results regarding the potential role of adjuvant treatment strategies in the setting of residual disease after NAC and RC. CONCLUSION: Although there is an urgent need for adjuvant treatment options for patients with MIBC after NAC and residual muscle invasive disease at RC, there has been very limited evidence available. Inclusion of such patients into ongoing adjuvant clinical trials is urgently needed; active surveillance is strongly recommended in the absence of trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Krebs
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ioannis Sokolakis
- Department of Urology, Martha-Maria Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Roland Seiler
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Horiguchi H, Hatakeyama S, Yoneyama T, Yoneyama MS, Tanaka T, Fujita N, Okamoto T, Yamamoto H, Yoneyama T, Yoshizawa T, Hashimoto Y, Kawaguchi T, Ohyama C. Prognostic significance of the Ki67 index and programmed death-ligand 1 expression after radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:238.e9-238.e17. [PMID: 33308976 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the association between Ki67 index and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients after RC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 262 MIBC patients treated with RC between April 2004 and April 2020. The impact of Ki67 index and PD-L1 expression on prognosis was evaluated by univariate Cox regression analysis. In addition, a pathomolecular risk score, including Ki67 and PD-L1, was developed to predict prognosis and pathological factors. We also evaluated the link between the Ki67 index and PD-L1 under the IL-6 stimulation in the bladder cancer cell lines of T24 and 5637 cells. RESULTS The median age and follow-up period was 69 years and 52 months, respectively. Ki67 index and PD-L1 expression were significantly associated with tumor recurrence. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that pT3-4, mixed histology, lymphovascular invasion positive (LVI+), pN+, Ki67-high (>17%), and PD-L1+ were significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). The pathomolecular risk score was developed using resection margin+ (1 point), mixed histology (1 point), LVI+ (1 point), pN+ (1 point), and Ki67-high (1 point). RFS and overall survival were significantly shorter in patients with higher pathomolecular risk scores (>1) than in those with lower risk scores (≤1). Cell proliferation was significantly increased in the T24 and 5637 cells under the IL-6 stimulation, while PD-L1 expression was not. CONCLUSIONS A significant effect of Ki67-high and PD-L1 expression on poor prognosis was observed in patients with MIBC. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the precise mechanisms of cell proliferation and PD-L1 expression in patients with MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotaka Horiguchi
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
| | - Tohru Yoneyama
- Department of Glycotechnology, Center for Advanced Medical Research
| | - Mihoko Sutoh Yoneyama
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Cell Biology, Oyokyo Kidney Research Institute, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Naoki Fujita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Teppei Okamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Tadashi Yoshizawa
- Department of Pathology and Bioscience, Hirosaki University, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | | | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan; Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan; Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zucali PA, Cordua N, D'Antonio F, Borea F, Perrino M, De Vincenzo F, Santoro A. Current Perspectives on Immunotherapy in the Peri-Operative Setting of Muscle-Infiltrating Bladder Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:568279. [PMID: 33194654 PMCID: PMC7609911 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.568279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer (MIBC) present a high risk of postoperative recurrence and death from metastatic urothelial cancer despite surgical resection. Before the use of peri-operative chemotherapy, about half (52%) of patients undergoing radical cystectomy had had a relapse of tumor disease within 5 years of surgery. However, when peri-operative cisplatin-based chemotherapy is added to radical cystectomy for patients with MIBC it provides limited benefit in terms of survival, disease recurrence and development of metastases, at the expense of toxic effects. In fact, a significant proportion of patients still recurs and die to metastatic disease. Given the success of immune-oncological drugs in metastatic urothelial cancer, several trials started to test them in patients with non-metastatic MIBC either in neo-adjuvant and adjuvant setting. The preliminary results of these studies in neo-adjuvant setting are showing great promise, confirming the potential benefits of immunotherapy also in patients with non-metastatic MIBC. The aim of this review is to present an overview of developments happening on the introduction of immunotherapy in peri-operative setting in non-metastatic urothelial cancer. Moreover, an analysis of the critical issues regarding how best customize the delivery of immunotherapy to optimize efficacy and minimize the adverse effects, with particular focus on potential prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers, is done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Andrea Zucali
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Cordua
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rozzano, Italy
| | - Federica D'Antonio
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rozzano, Italy
| | - Federica Borea
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rozzano, Italy
| | - Matteo Perrino
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rozzano, Italy
| | - Fabio De Vincenzo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rozzano, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Riaz IB, Hussain SA. Perioperative Treatment in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Secondary Endpoints in a Randomized Trial Comparing Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Dose-dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Adriamycin, and Cisplatin. Eur Urol 2020; 79:222-224. [PMID: 33012577 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Irbaz Bin Riaz
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Syed A Hussain
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Oncology, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ravi P, Sonpavde GP. Considerations in prescribing pharmacotherapy for localized and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 22:1-4. [PMID: 32866395 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1813717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Praful Ravi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guru P Sonpavde
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pardo JC, Ruiz de Porras V, Plaja A, Carrato C, Etxaniz O, Buisan O, Font A. Moving towards Personalized Medicine in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21176271. [PMID: 32872531 PMCID: PMC7503307 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the recommended treatment, with the highest level of evidence, for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, only a minority of patients receive this treatment, mainly due to patient comorbidities, the relatively small survival benefit, and the lack of predictive biomarkers to select those patients most likely to benefit from this multimodal approach. In addition, adjuvant chemotherapy has been recommended for patients with high-risk MIBC, although randomized trials have not provided conclusive evidence on the impact of this approach. At present, however, this situation is changing, largely due to our improved knowledge of the molecular biology of bladder cancer, which has enabled us to identify new prognostic and predictive biomarkers that can be used to select the most appropriate treatment for each patient. Moreover, new active treatments, especially immunotherapy, have shown promising results in the neoadjuvant setting. In addition, the gene expression profile of bladder tumors can be used to classify them into different subtypes, which correlate with specific clinical-pathological characteristics and with treatment response or resistance. Therefore, the main objective for the near future is to introduce these translational breakthroughs into routine clinical practice in order to personalize treatment for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Pardo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain; (J.C.P.); (A.P.); (O.E.)
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B·ARGO), Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain;
| | - Vicenç Ruiz de Porras
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B·ARGO), Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain;
- Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain
| | - Andrea Plaja
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain; (J.C.P.); (A.P.); (O.E.)
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B·ARGO), Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain;
| | - Cristina Carrato
- Pathology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain;
| | - Olatz Etxaniz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain; (J.C.P.); (A.P.); (O.E.)
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B·ARGO), Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain;
| | - Oscar Buisan
- Urology Department, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain;
| | - Albert Font
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain; (J.C.P.); (A.P.); (O.E.)
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B·ARGO), Ctra. Can Ruti-Camí de les Escoles s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-93-497-8925; Fax: +34-93-497-8950
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Necchi A, Marandino L, Raggi D, Bandini M, Gallina A, Moschini M, Briganti A, Montorsi F. Is it Time to Consider Eliminating Surgery from the Treatment of Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer? Eur Urol 2020; 79:713-716. [PMID: 32861574 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The similar clinical behavior, overlapping therapeutic patterns, and several clinical trials addressing the neoadjuvant and first-line therapy settings for bladder cancer support the call for a more uniform definition of "locally advanced" disease. We highlight the diverse therapeutic opportunities that patients with locally advanced bladder cancer may receive at present. Multimodal management, and post-therapy surgery in particular, may still have a role in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Leow JJ, Chong YL, Chang SL, Valderrama BP, Powles T, Bellmunt J. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy. Eur Urol 2020; 79:635-654. [PMID: 32798146 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT To improve the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), clinicians have used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) before or after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Despite some new data, the evidence remains mixed on their efficacy. OBJECTIVE To update the current evidence on the role of NAC and AC for UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched for all studies investigating NAC or AC for UTUC in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to February 2020. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For NAC, the pooled pathologic complete response rate (≤ypT0N0M0) was 11% (n = 811) and pathologic partial response rate (≤ypT1N0M0) was 43% (n = 869), both across 14 studies. Across six studies, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.59, p < 0.001) for overall survival (OS) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.24-0.61, p < 0.001) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in favor of NAC. The evidence for NAC is at best level 2. As for AC, there was a benefit in OS (pooled HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.92, p = 0.004 across 14 studies and 7983 patients), CSS (pooled HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001 across 18 studies and 5659 patients), and disease-free survival (DFS; pooled HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38-0.70 across four studies and 602 patients). While most studies were retrospective (level 2 evidence), there were two prospective randomized trials providing level 1 evidence. There are currently four phase 2 trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapy and three phase 2 trials on adjuvant immunotherapy for UTUC. CONCLUSIONS NAC for UTUC confers a favorable pathologic response and tumor downstaging rate, and an OS and CSS benefit compared with RNU alone. AC confers an OS, CSS, and DFS benefit compared with RNU alone. Currently, the evidence for AC appears stronger (with positive level 1 evidence) than that for NAC (at best level 2 evidence). Limited data are available for chemoimmunotherapy approaches, but preliminary data support an active research investment. PATIENT SUMMARY After a comprehensive search of the latest studies examining the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer, the pooled evidence shows that perioperative chemotherapy was beneficial for prolonging survival; however, the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy was stronger than that for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yew Lam Chong
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trusts, London, UK
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and PSMAR-IMIM Research Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|