1
|
Lin C, Chen Y, Shi L, Lin H, Xia H, Yin W. Advances in bio-immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:13451-13458. [PMID: 37460807 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05152-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the significant diseases that threaten the survival of men worldwide, with the progression of androgen deprivation therapy, become much rely on it, finally, developed into castration-resistant prostate cancer (ADT). In western countries, ranks second in incidence, and in China, with increasing lifespan, the incidence of prostate cancer is rising steadily. Although chemotherapy agents, such as taxane, have achieved some efficacy, treatment failure still occur. As sensitivity of hormone levels change, the disease can progress to castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Because of the poor efficacy of traditional surgery, endocrine therapy, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, the treatment options for castrate-resistant prostate cancer are limited. Advanced prostate cancer can progress on immunotherapy, and thus, bio -immunotherapy targeting the unique, prostate microenvironment is an important option. In this paper, we systematically revealed the role of three types of bio-immunotherapies (immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumors, vaccines, cytokines) in castrate-resistant prostate cancer, providing a reference for clinical treatment of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Canling Lin
- Yichun University, Yichun, 336000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yonghui Chen
- Yichun University, Yichun, 336000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Liji Shi
- Yichun University, Yichun, 336000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Huarong Lin
- The Graduate School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China
| | - Hongmei Xia
- Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Yichun Affiliated to Clinical Medicine School, Yichun, 336000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Weihua Yin
- Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Yichun Affiliated to Clinical Medicine School, Yichun, 336000, Jiangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Role of PARP Inhibitors in Cancer Immunotherapy: Potential Friends to Immune Activating Molecules and Foes to Immune Checkpoints. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225633. [PMID: 36428727 PMCID: PMC9688455 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) induce cytotoxic effects as single agents in tumors characterized by defective repair of DNA double-strand breaks deriving from BRCA1/2 mutations or other abnormalities in genes associated with homologous recombination. Preclinical studies have shown that PARPi-induced DNA damage may affect the tumor immune microenvironment and immune-mediated anti-tumor response through several mechanisms. In particular, increased DNA damage has been shown to induce the activation of type I interferon pathway and up-regulation of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells, which can both enhance sensitivity to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). Despite the recent approval of ICIs for a number of advanced cancer types based on their ability to reinvigorate T-cell-mediated antitumor immune responses, a consistent percentage of treated patients fail to respond, strongly encouraging the identification of combination therapies to overcome resistance. In the present review, we analyzed both established and unexplored mechanisms that may be elicited by PARPi, supporting immune reactivation and their potential synergism with currently used ICIs. This analysis may indicate novel and possibly patient-specific immune features that might represent new pharmacological targets of PARPi, potentially leading to the identification of predictive biomarkers of response to their combination with ICIs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Fizazi K, Retz M, Petrylak DP, Goh JC, Perez-Gracia J, Lacombe L, Zschäbitz S, Burotto M, Mahammedi H, Gravis G, Bastos DA, McCune SL, Vázquez Limón JC, Kwan EM, Castellano D, Fléchon A, Saad F, Grimm MO, Shaffer DR, Armstrong AJ, Bhagavatheeswaran P, Amin NP, Ünsal-Kaçmaz K, Wang X, Li J, Loehr A, Pachynski RK. Nivolumab plus rucaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from the phase 2 CheckMate 9KD trial. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2022-004761. [PMID: 35977756 PMCID: PMC9389086 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-004761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CheckMate 9KD (NCT03338790) is a non-randomized, multicohort, phase 2 trial of nivolumab plus other anticancer treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We report results from cohorts A1 and A2 of CheckMate 9KD, specifically evaluating nivolumab plus rucaparib. METHODS CheckMate 9KD enrolled adult patients with histologically confirmed mCRPC, ongoing androgen deprivation therapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Cohort A1 included patients with postchemotherapy mCRPC (1-2 prior taxane-based regimens) and ≤2 prior novel hormonal therapies (eg, abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide); cohort A2 included patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC and prior novel hormonal therapy. Patients received nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks plus rucaparib 600 mg two times per day (nivolumab dosing ≤2 years). Coprimary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA50-RR; ≥50% PSA reduction) in all-treated patients and patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive tumors, determined before enrollment. Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Outcomes (95% CI) among all-treated, HRD-positive, and BRCA1/2-positive populations for cohort A1 were confirmed ORR: 10.3% (3.9-21.2) (n=58), 17.2% (5.8-35.8) (n=29), and 33.3% (7.5-70.1) (n=9); confirmed PSA50-RR: 11.9% (5.9-20.8) (n=84), 18.2% (8.2-32.7) (n=44), and 41.7% (15.2-72.3) (n=12); median rPFS: 4.9 (3.7-5.7) (n=88), 5.8 (3.7-8.4) (n=45), and 5.6 (2.8-15.7) (n=12) months; and median OS: 13.9 (10.4-15.8) (n=88), 15.4 (11.4-18.2) (n=45), and 15.2 (3.0-not estimable) (n=12) months. For cohort A2 they were confirmed ORR: 15.4% (5.9-30.5) (n=39), 25.0% (8.7-49.1) (n=20), and 33.3% (7.5-70.1) (n=9); confirmed PSA50-RR: 27.3% (17.0-39.6) (n=66), 41.9 (24.5-60.9) (n=31), and 84.6% (54.6-98.1) (n=13); median rPFS: 8.1 (5.6-10.9) (n=71), 10.9 (6.7-12.0) (n=34), and 10.9 (5.6-12.0) (n=15) months; and median OS: 20.2 (14.1-22.8) (n=71), 22.7 (14.1-not estimable) (n=34), and 20.2 (11.1-not estimable) (n=15) months. In cohorts A1 and A2, respectively, the most common any-grade and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were nausea (40.9% and 40.8%) and anemia (20.5% and 14.1%). Discontinuation rates due to TRAEs were 27.3% and 23.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab plus rucaparib is active in patients with HRD-positive postchemotherapy or chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC, particularly those harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Safety was as expected, with no new signals identified. Whether the addition of nivolumab incrementally improves outcomes versus rucaparib alone cannot be determined from this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03338790.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel P Petrylak
- Smilow Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Goh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- ICON Research, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jose Perez-Gracia
- Oncology Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Louis Lacombe
- Department of Surgery, Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mauricio Burotto
- Department of Oncology, Bradford Hill Clinical Research Center, Santiago, Chile
| | - Hakim Mahammedi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Juan Carlos Vázquez Limón
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Jalisciense de Cancerología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Fred Saad
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal/CHUM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - David R Shaffer
- Department of Medical Oncology, New York Oncology Hematology, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Neha P Amin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Keziban Ünsal-Kaçmaz
- Department of Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Xuya Wang
- Department of Informatics and Predictive Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Informatics and Predictive Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Andrea Loehr
- Department of Translational Medicine, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Russell K Pachynski
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Naqos N. Prostate cancer-highlights from American Society of Clinical Oncology virtual meeting 2020. Asian J Urol 2022; 9:282-286. [PMID: 36035358 PMCID: PMC9399541 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Naqos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Teyssonneau D, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Dariane C, Barret E, Beauval JB, Brureau L, Créhange G, Fiard G, Fromont G, Gauthé M, Ruffion A, Renard-Penna R, Mathieu R, Sargos P, Rouprêt M, Ploussard G, Roubaud G. PARP Inhibitors as Monotherapy in Daily Practice for Advanced Prostate Cancers. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061734. [PMID: 35330059 PMCID: PMC8952857 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite recent improvements in survival, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPCs) remain lethal. Alterations in genes involved in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway are associated with poor prognosis. Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have demonstrated anti-tumoral effects by synthetic lethality in patients with mCRPCs harboring HRR gene alterations, in particular BRCA2. While both olaparib and rucaparib have obtained government approvals for use, the selection of eligible patients as well as the prescription of these treatments within the clinical urology community are challenging. This review proposes a brief review of the rationale and outcomes of PARPi treatment, then a pragmatic vision of PARPi use in terms of prescription and the selection of patients based on molecular screening, which can involve potential genetic counseling in the case of associated germinal alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Teyssonneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
- Correspondence:
| | - Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France;
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris University, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France;
| | - Jean-Baptiste Beauval
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, 31000 Toulouse, France; (J.-B.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Laurent Brureau
- Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, University of Antilles, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, France;
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38400 Grenoble, France;
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Curie Institute, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Gaëlle Fromont
- Department of Pathology, CHRU Tours, 37000 Tours, France;
| | - Mathieu Gauthé
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Scintep, 38000 Grenoble, France;
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Service d’Urologie Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69000 Lyon, France;
- Equipe 2, Centre d’Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY), Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Department of Radiology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Radiology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, 75013 Paris, France;
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France;
- Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail), University of Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, 75013 Paris, France;
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, 31000 Toulouse, France; (J.-B.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Principe DR. Precision Medicine for BRCA/PALB2-Mutated Pancreatic Cancer and Emerging Strategies to Improve Therapeutic Responses to PARP Inhibition. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040897. [PMID: 35205643 PMCID: PMC8869830 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary For the small subset of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with loss-of-function mutations to BRCA1/2 or PALB2, both first-line and maintenance therapy differs significantly. These mutations confer a loss of double-strand break DNA homologous recombination (HR), substantially altering drug sensitivities. In this review, we discuss the current treatment guidelines for PDAC tumors deficient in HR, as well as newly emerging strategies to improve drug responses in this population. We also highlight additional patient populations in which these strategies may also be effective, and novel strategies aiming to confer similar drug sensitivity to tumors proficient in HR repair. Abstract Pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030. As patients typically present with advanced disease and show poor responses to broad-spectrum chemotherapy, overall survival remains a dismal 10%. This underscores an urgent clinical need to identify new therapeutic approaches for PDAC patients. Precision medicine is now the standard of care for several difficult-to-treat cancer histologies. Such approaches involve the identification of a clinically actionable molecular feature, which is matched to an appropriate targeted therapy. Selective poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors such as Niraparib, Olaparib, Talazoparib, Rucaparib, and Veliparib are now approved for several cancers with loss of high-fidelity double-strand break homologous recombination (HR), namely those with deleterious mutations to BRCA1/2, PALB2, and other functionally related genes. Recent evidence suggests that the presence of such mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common and lethal pancreatic cancer histotype, significantly alters drug responses both with respect to first-line chemotherapy and maintenance therapy. In this review, we discuss the current treatment paradigm for PDAC tumors with confirmed deficits in double-strand break HR, as well as emerging strategies to both improve responses to PARP inhibition in HR-deficient PDAC and confer sensitivity to tumors proficient in HR repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Principe
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Movassaghi M, Chung R, Anderson CB, Stein M, Saenger Y, Faiena I. Overcoming Immune Resistance in Prostate Cancer: Challenges and Advances. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194757. [PMID: 34638243 PMCID: PMC8507531 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Immunotherapy has changed the landscape of treatment modalities available for many different types of malignancies. However, the factors that influence the success of immunotherapeutics have not been as clearly seen in advanced prostate cancer, likely due to immunosuppressive factors that exist within the prostate cancer tumor microenvironment. While there have been many immunotherapeutics used for prostate cancer, the majority have targeted a single immunosuppressive mechanism resulting in limited clinical efficacy. More recent research centered on elucidating the key mechanisms of immune resistance in the prostate tumor microenvironment has led to the discovery of a range of new treatment targets. With that in mind, many clinical trials have now set out to evaluate combination immunotherapeutic strategies in patients with advanced prostate cancer, in the hopes of circumventing the immunosuppressive mechanisms. Abstract The use of immunotherapy has become a critical treatment modality in many advanced cancers. However, immunotherapy in prostate cancer has not been met with similar success. Multiple interrelated mechanisms, such as low tumor mutational burden, immunosuppressive cells, and impaired cellular immunity, appear to subvert the immune system, creating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and leading to lower treatment efficacy in advanced prostate cancer. The lethality of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer is driven by the lack of therapeutic regimens capable of generating durable responses. Multiple strategies are currently being tested to overcome immune resistance including combining various classes of treatment modalities. Several completed and ongoing trials have shown that combining vaccines or checkpoint inhibitors with hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, antibody–drug conjugates, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, or chemotherapy may enhance immune responses and induce long-lasting clinical responses without significant toxicity. Here, we review the current state of immunotherapy for prostate cancer, as well as tumor-specific mechanisms underlying therapeutic resistance, with a comprehensive look at the current preclinical and clinical immunotherapeutic strategies aimed at overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and impaired cellular immunity that have largely limited the utility of immunotherapy in advanced prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miyad Movassaghi
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (R.C.); (C.B.A.)
- Correspondence: (M.M.); (I.F.)
| | - Rainjade Chung
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (R.C.); (C.B.A.)
| | - Christopher B. Anderson
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (R.C.); (C.B.A.)
| | - Mark Stein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (M.S.); (Y.S.)
| | - Yvonne Saenger
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (M.S.); (Y.S.)
| | - Izak Faiena
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (R.C.); (C.B.A.)
- Correspondence: (M.M.); (I.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Melo CM, Vidotto T, Chaves LP, Lautert-Dutra W, dos Reis RB, Squire JA. The Role of Somatic Mutations on the Immune Response of the Tumor Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:9550. [PMID: 34502458 PMCID: PMC8431051 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22179550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has improved patient survival in many types of cancer, but for prostate cancer, initial results with immunotherapy have been disappointing. Prostate cancer is considered an immunologically excluded or cold tumor, unable to generate an effective T-cell response against cancer cells. However, a small but significant percentage of patients do respond to immunotherapy, suggesting that some specific molecular subtypes of this tumor may have a better response to checkpoint inhibitors. Recent findings suggest that, in addition to their function as cancer genes, somatic mutations of PTEN, TP53, RB1, CDK12, and DNA repair, or specific activation of regulatory pathways, such as ETS or MYC, may also facilitate immune evasion of the host response against cancer. This review presents an update of recent discoveries about the role that the common somatic mutations can play in changing the tumor microenvironment and immune response against prostate cancer. We describe how detailed molecular genetic analyses of the tumor microenvironment of prostate cancer using mouse models and human tumors are providing new insights into the cell types and pathways mediating immune responses. These analyses are helping researchers to design drug combinations that are more likely to target the molecular and immunological pathways that underlie treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Morais Melo
- Department of Genetics, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048-900, SP, Brazil; (C.M.M.); (T.V.); (L.P.C.); (W.L.-D.)
| | - Thiago Vidotto
- Department of Genetics, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048-900, SP, Brazil; (C.M.M.); (T.V.); (L.P.C.); (W.L.-D.)
| | - Luiz Paulo Chaves
- Department of Genetics, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048-900, SP, Brazil; (C.M.M.); (T.V.); (L.P.C.); (W.L.-D.)
| | - William Lautert-Dutra
- Department of Genetics, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048-900, SP, Brazil; (C.M.M.); (T.V.); (L.P.C.); (W.L.-D.)
| | - Rodolfo Borges dos Reis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048-900, SP, Brazil;
| | - Jeremy Andrew Squire
- Department of Genetics, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048-900, SP, Brazil; (C.M.M.); (T.V.); (L.P.C.); (W.L.-D.)
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L3N6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rathi N, McFarland TR, Nussenzveig R, Agarwal N, Swami U. Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Metastatic Castration Refractory Prostate Cancer. Drugs 2020; 81:191-206. [PMID: 33369720 PMCID: PMC7932934 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01456-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapies have shown remarkable success in the treatment of multiple cancer types; however, despite encouraging preclinical activity, registration trials of immunotherapy in prostate cancer have largely been unsuccessful. Sipuleucel-T remains the only approved immunotherapy for the treatment of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer based on modest improvement in overall survival. This immune evasion in the case of prostate cancer has been attributed to tumor-intrinsic factors, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and host factors, which ultimately make it an inert 'cold' tumor. Recently, multiple approaches have been investigated to turn prostate cancer into a 'hot' tumor. Antibodies directed against programmed cell death protein 1 have a tumor agnostic approval for a small minority of patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic prostate cancer. Herein, we present an overview of the current immunotherapy landscape in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors. We describe the results of clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; either as single agents or in combination with other checkpoint inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, novel hormonal therapies, chemotherapies, and radioligands. Finally, we review upcoming immunotherapies, including novel monoclonal antibodies, chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, Bi-Specific T cell Engagers (BiTEs), therapies targeting the adenosine pathway, and other miscellaneous agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nityam Rathi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive Suite 5726, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Taylor Ryan McFarland
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive Suite 5726, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Roberto Nussenzveig
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive Suite 5726, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive Suite 5726, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Umang Swami
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive Suite 5726, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tripathi A, McFarland T, Agarwal N. PARP Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer: A Promise Delivered. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:612-614. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|