PARP Inhibitors as Monotherapy in Daily Practice for Advanced Prostate Cancers

Toad venom-derived bufadienolides and their therapeutic application in prostate cancers: Current status and future directions

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Specially, the high incidence rate and prevalence of drug resistance have rendered prostate cancer (PCa) a great threat to men’s health. Novel modalities with different structures or mechanisms are in urgent need to overcome these two challenges. Traditional Chinese medicine toad venom-derived agents (TVAs) have shown to possess versatile bioactivities in treating certain diseases including PCa. In this work, we attempted to have an overview of bufadienolides, the major bioactive components in TVAs, in the treatment of PCa in the past decade, including their derivatives developed by medicinal chemists to antagonize certain drawbacks of bufadienolides such as innate toxic effect to normal cells. Generally, bufadienolides can effectively induce apoptosis and suppress PCa cells in-vitro and in-vivo, majorly mediated by regulating certain microRNAs/long non-coding RNAs, or by modulating key pro-survival and pro-metastasis players in PCa. Importantly, critical obstacles and challenges using TVAs will be discussed and possible solutions and future perspectives will also be presented in this review. Further in-depth studies are clearly needed to decipher the mechanisms, e.g., targets and pathways, toxic effects and fully reveal their application. The information collected in this work may help evoke more effects in developing bufadienolides as therapeutic agents in PCa.

Role of Rucaparib in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: Clinical Perspectives and Considerations

Prostate cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide and has strong genetic associations. This is important for the development of therapeutics for the condition, as metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is resistant to standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and has a relatively poor prognosis. We conducted a literature review on rucaparib, a poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that is currently indicated for the treatment of patients with mCRPC who harbor mutations in BRCA1/2 (homologous recombination repair [HRR] genes) and who have already tried androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapies (ARAT) and a taxane chemotherapy. We describe rucaparib’s FDA approval, which was based on the results of the single-arm, open-label, Phase II TRITON2 clinical trial, which found an objective response rate (ORR) of 43.5%, a duration of response (DOR) of over six months in length and an acceptable safety profile. Rucaparib’s dosage and clinical considerations for use were also discussed. We also compared rucaparib’s use and safety profile with Olaparib, niraparib and talazoparib, three other PARP inhibitors tested for the treatment of mCRPC. Overall, initial results show that the safety profile of all four drugs in mCRPC was relatively similar, and further testing is currently indicated for all four. Differences in their metabolism, however, also warrant further research. The clinical validity of rucaparib will be tested by the follow-up TRITON3 clinical trial, which is comparing the effect of rucaparib compared to standard therapies for mCRPC harboring BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations. Other than TRITON3, other clinical trials are testing rucaparib’s ability against other cancers (prostate or otherwise) with HRR mutations, and also the efficacy of combination therapies involving rucaparib. Finally, more research is needed to elucidate rucaparib’s effect on HRR mutations other than BRCA1/2. Advancements in understanding the genetic landscape of mCRPC will also assist in understanding rucaparib’s full therapeutic potential.

PARP Inhibitors: A New Horizon for Patients with Prostate Cancer

The introduction of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in prostate cancer is a milestone and provides a pathway to hope in fighting this disease. It is the first time that drugs, based on the concept of synthetic lethality, have been approved for prostate cancer. In addition, it is also the first time that genetic mutation tests have been included in the therapeutic algorithm of this disease, representing a significant step forward for precision and personalized treatment of prostate cancer. The objectives of this review are: (1) understanding the mechanism of action of PARPi in monotherapy and combinations; (2) gaining insights on patient selection for PARPi; (3) exposing the pivotal studies that have allowed its approval, and; (4) offering an overview of the ongoing trials. Nevertheless, many unsolved questions remain, such as the number of patients who could potentially benefit from PARPi, whether to use PARPi in monotherapy or in combination, and when is the best time to use them in advanced or localized disease. To answer these and other questions, many clinical trials are underway. Some of them have recently demonstrated promising results that may favor the introduction of new combinations in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.