Small cell carcinoma of the kidney treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor/tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Introduction

Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the kidney is extremely rare. Although the majority of patients with advanced renal small cell carcinoma were treated with a combination of cisplatin and etoposide, the efficacy was limited. We report the first case with renal small cell carcinoma who received nivolumab and cabozantinib.

Case presentation

A 57-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a massive left kidney mass and several bone, lymph nodes, liver, and lung metastases. A left renal mass biopsy made the diagnosis of small cell carcinoma. Nivolumab and cabozantinib were used in combination therapy. The tumors were stable during the treatment for 4 weeks. However, the treatment was halted due to a serious adverse event, immune-related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Although immune-related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis was resolved with corticosteroids, the patient died 3 months after the initiation of nivolumab and cabozantinib.

Conclusion

We reported the first case of renal small cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab and cabozantinib.

TIGIT-based immunotherapeutics in lung cancer

In this review, we explore the biology of the TIGIT checkpoint and its potential as a therapeutic target in lung cancer. We briefly review a highly selected set of clinical trials that have reported or are currently recruiting in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer, a disease transformed by the advent of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. We explore the murine data underlying TIGIT blockade and further explore the reliance of effective anti-TIGIT therapy on DNAM-1(CD226)-positive activated effector CD8+ T cells. The synergism with anti-PD-1 therapy is also explored. Future directions in the realm of overcoming resistance to checkpoint blockade and extending the repertoire of other checkpoints are also briefly explored.

Emerging Strategies for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review

Importance

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease that is characterized by rapid growth and the early development of metastases. Patients typically respond to initial chemotherapy but quickly experience relapse, resulting in a poor long-term outcome. Therapeutic innovations that substantially improve survival have historically been limited, and reliable, predictive biomarkers are lacking.

Observations

This review examines the biologic characteristics of SCLC, the current treatment landscape, and ongoing efforts to identify novel therapeutic targets. Ongoing research has advanced the understanding of molecular categories and the immunologic microenvironment of SCLC, which in turn has helped improve disease classification and staging. Recently, immunotherapy-based regimens have become available for the management of SCLC, with 2 programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 inhibitors approved in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of extensive-stage disease. For second-line treatment, a novel alkylating agent, lurbinectedin, which inhibits oncogenic transcription, has been approved for use in patients with metastatic SCLC. Furthermore, a wide variety of therapies and innovative combination regimens are being continuously evaluated. Potential therapeutic strategies, including aurora kinase A inhibitors, polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitors, cyclin-dependent kinase 7 inhibitors, delta-like protein 3 agents, antiganglioside agents, CD47 inhibitors, and lysine-specific histone demethylase 1a inhibitors, are also being examined.

Conclusions and Relevance

Therapeutic optimization of SCLC remains a challenge, but recent trial results and drug approvals are encouraging. Advances in research have revealed critical information regarding biologic characteristics of the disease, which may lead to the identification of vulnerabilities and the development of new therapies. Further research focused on identifying biomarkers and evaluating innovative therapies will be paramount to improving treatment outcomes for patients with SCLC.

Whole-Exome Sequencing Uncovers Specific Genetic Variation Difference Based on Different Modes of Drug Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer

The poor survival rate of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is mainly related to the condition that patients with SCLC often have good responses to first-line chemotherapy initially, but later on, most of these patients relapse rapidly due to resistance to further treatment. In this study, we attempted to analyze whole-exome sequencing data based on the largest sample size to date, to develop a classifier to predict whether a patient will be chemorefractory or chemosensitive and to explicate the risk of recurrence that affects the prognosis of patients. We showed the different characteristics of somatic mutational signatures, somatic mutation genes, and distinct genome instability between chemorefractory and chemosensitive SCLC patients. Amplified mutations in the chemosensitive group inhibited the regulation of the cell cycle process, transcription factor binding, and B-cell differentiation. Analysis of deletion mutation also suggested that detection of the chromosomal-level variation might influence our treatment decisions. Higher PD-L1 expressions (based on TPS methods) were mostly present among chemosensitive patients (p = 0.026), while there were no differences in PD-L1 expressions (based on CPS methods) and CD8⁺ TILs between the two groups. According to the model determined by logistic regression, each sample was endowed with a predictive probability value (PV). The samples were divided into a high-risk group (>0.55) and a low-risk group (≤0.55), and the survival analysis showed obvious differences between the two groups. This study provides a reference basis to translate this knowledge into practice, such as formulating personalized treatment plans, which may benefit Chinese patients with SCLC.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer and mesothelioma

Immunotherapy has transformed lung cancer care in recent years. In addition to providing durable responses and prolonged survival outcomes for a subset of patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)— either as monotherapy or in combination with other ICIs or chemotherapy—have demonstrated benefits in first-line therapy for advanced disease, the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, as well as in additional thoracic malignancies such as small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and mesothelioma. Challenging questions remain, however, on topics including therapy selection, appropriate biomarker-based identification of patients who may derive benefit, the use of immunotherapy in special populations such as people with autoimmune disorders, and toxicity management. Patient and caregiver education and support for quality of life (QOL) is also important to attain maximal benefit with immunotherapy. To provide guidance to the oncology community on these and other important concerns, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). This CPG represents an update to SITC’s 2018 publication on immunotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC, and is expanded to include recommendations on SCLC and mesothelioma. The Expert Panel drew on the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for lung cancer and mesothelioma, including diagnostic testing, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events, and patient QOL considerations. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers using immunotherapy to treat patients with lung cancer or mesothelioma.

Immunotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment: a Promising Headway for Future Perspective

OPINION STATEMENT

Despite advancements in clinical research, both prognosis and treatment for SCLC patients are still in the nascent stage. SCLC is a fatal disease with high tumor mutational burden and is strongly associated with exposure to tobacco. This leads to the development of potential neo-antigens, inhibition of immune responses, and development of paraneoplastic disorders. Surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are widely accepted treatments for cancer globally, and most recently, immunotherapy has now become the "fourth pillar" of SCLC treatment. Various immune checkpoint pathways regulate the activation of T cells at multiple stages during an immune response. T cell checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab), anti-PDL1, and anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab, ipilimumab) have potential to show anti-cancer activity along with the promise to prolong survival in patients with SCLC. Treatment with the CTLA-4-specific antibodies can restore the immune response by increasing the accumulation and survival of T-cells whereas monoclonal antibodies block either PD-1 or its ligands that prevent downregulation of effector T-cell, which enables the T-cells to mediate the death of tumor cells. Furthermore, monoclonal antibody in combination with chemotherapy has attained quite a focus to enhance the survival of SCLC patients. Apart from this, various immunotherapeutic approaches have been evaluated in the clinical trials for SCLC patients such as TLR9 agonist, anti-CD47, anti-ganglioside therapy, and anti-Notch signaling. The current review focuses on the rationale as well as on the clinical studies of immunotherapy in SCLC along with the clinical end results of certain immunotherapeutic agents and novel therapeutic combinations in SCLC patients.

Developments in systemic therapies for the management of lung cancer

Lung cancer accounts for approximately 1 in 10 new cancer diagnoses annually and is responsible for the most cancer-associated deaths in Australia. Despite such figures, there is reason for optimism with many practice-changing developments to report for the management of patients with thoracic malignancies over the last few years. We outline such changes, including the emerging role of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting for patients with localised non-small-cell lung cancer, as well as the established standard of consolidation immunotherapy following definitive chemoradiotherapy for those with locally advanced disease. In the metastatic setting, combination chemotherapy-immunotherapy approaches have become the new paradigm for most patients in the absence of a recognised driver mutation. A range of novel targeted therapies now exist and are Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)-subsidised for targets such as EGFR, ALK and ROS1, with many others, such as KRAS G12C, NTRK, MET, RET and HER2, also with therapies rapidly being developed. Even among patients with small-cell lung cancer, who account for the worst prognoses and until recently have received a chemotherapy regimen that has remained unchanged in over 20 years, there is a new standard-of-care in combination chemotherapy-immunotherapy. Furthermore, immunotherapy and potentially anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents now also play a role in mesothelioma treatment. Last, given recent developments in immunotherapy, targeted therapy and combination approaches in the non-small-cell lung cancer space, there is an increasing recognition of the diversity of lived experience for such patients and need for survivorship programmes to acknowledge such nuances.

Comparing strategy of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on six RCTs incorporating 2800 participants

OBJECTIVES

The project is designed to compare the clinical efficacy and adverse events resulting from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

PubMed Database and ClinicalTrials.gov were both searched to identify randomized controlled clinical trials for assessing ICIs in all-stage SCLC. After screening in strict accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eligible studies were evaluated in regard to the population, intervention, comparator, outcome as well as study design (PICOS) pattern. Furthermore, primary endpoints of these randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and complete/objective response rate (CRR/ORR). Statistical analyses were realized via Review Manager Version 5.3 Software.

RESULTS

Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the ICIs plus chemotherapy group significantly improved with respect to such indicators as OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90, P < 0.0001), PFS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, P < 0.00001) and ORR (64.7% versus 59.1%). According to the safety analysis, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) at all grades was higher in ICIs plus chemotherapy group (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.20-2.10, P = 0.001), bearing no statistical significance at grade 3 or above (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.99-1.49, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ICIs and chemotherapy witnessed better anti-neoplastic efficacy for SCLC. Moreover, the incidence of trAEs at all grades was elevated in ICIs plus chemotherapy group, with little discrepancy in both groups at grade 3 or above.

[Small Cell Lung Cancer]

Small cell lung cancer is an aggressive cancer entity and characterized by rapid progression, early distant metastasis and poor prognosis. Only the minority of patients presents with a non-metastatic stage disease where chemo-radiotherapy or - in very selected cases - even surgical resection may be discussed. For most patients, the efficacy of systemic therapy is crucial. However, although most patients respond to platinum doublet chemotherapy, virtually all patients with metastatic disease eventually develop tumor progression for which there are limited treatment options. Recently and for the first time since decades, the systemic approaches have been enriched by the implementation of immunotherapy. Moreover, novel therapeutic approaches such as new cytotoxic agents or further immune modulatory strategies are being tested in clinical studies that might broaden our treatment options in the future even further.

Adding PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors to Chemotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Simple Summary

Treatment strategies in advanced, metastatic small cell lung cancer have been recently implemented by the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the magnitude of survival benefit observed in clinical trials does not reproduce the major improvements observed in non-small cell lung cancer and other malignant diseases. By performing a systematic review and gathering the available data in a meta-analysis, we aim to compare the outcomes of patients treated with standard chemotherapy alone or with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors immunotherapy across clinical trials, in order to sustain treatment decisions. The addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to standard chemotherapy improves all activity and efficacy outcomes, with a manageable safety profile. The benefit in overall survival is more evident if considering long-term analysis, compared to median estimations.

Abstract

Survival outcomes in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES SCLC) are dismal, with median overall survival (OS) less than 12 months. The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with first-line platinum-etoposide chemotherapy has been recently evaluated in randomized clinical trials. We performed a systematic literature review through PubMed and conference proceedings. Randomized trials evaluating chemotherapy +/− PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs were included in the meta-analysis. Efficacy (OS), activity [progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR)] outcomes and toxicities were analyzed. For selected endpoints, we focused on patients’ subgroups (OS) and on landmark analyses (OS, PFS). Four randomized trials were identified; globally, 1553 patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy +/− PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Adding a PD-1/PD-L1 ICI to chemotherapy led to a significant benefit in OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–0.85, p < 0.00001), PFS [HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.84, p < 0.00001] and ORR [odds ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.04–1.57, p = 0.02]. No unexpected toxicity emerged. At 12, 18, 24 months for OS, and at 12, 18 months for PFS, experimental arms retained significant improvement in event-free rates, with absolute gain of approximately 10% compared with standard treatment. Albeit the magnitude of the benefit is less impacting compared to other settings of immunotherapy, the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs to chemotherapy in ES SCLC provided significant improvements in survival outcomes with the known toxicity profile. Biomarkers predicting which patients are suitable to derive long-term benefits are eagerly awaited.