Beyond Rule of Five and PROTACs in Modern Drug Discovery: Polarity Reducers, Chameleonicity, and the Evolving Physicochemical Landscape

Developing orally bioavailable drugs demands an understanding of absorption in early drug development. Traditional methods and physicochemical properties optimize absorption for rule of five (Ro5) compounds; beyond rule of five (bRo5) drugs necessitate advanced tools like the experimental measure of exposed polarity (EPSA) and the AbbVie multiparametric score (AB-MPS). Analyzing AB-MPS and EPSA against ∼1000 compounds with human absorption data and ∼10,000 AbbVie tool compounds (∼1000 proteolysis targeting chimeras or PROTACs, ∼7000 Ro5s, and ∼2000 bRo5s) revealed new patterns of physicochemical trends. We introduced a high-throughput "polarity reduction" descriptor: ETR, the EPSA-to-topological polar surface area (TPSA) ratio, highlights unique bRo5 and PROTAC subsets for specialized drug design strategies for effective absorption. Our methods and guidelines refine drug design by providing innovative in vitro approaches, enhancing physicochemical property optimization, and enabling accurate predictions of intestinal absorption in the complex bRo5 domain.

Expert Perspectives on Controversies in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Management: Narrative Review and Report of the First US Prostate Cancer Conference Part 2

Background

Management strategies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have rapidly shifted in recent years. As novel imaging and therapeutic approaches have made their way to the clinic, providers are encountering increasingly challenging clinical scenarios, with limited guidance from the current literature.

Materials and Methods

The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) is a multidisciplinary meeting of prostate cancer experts intended to address the many challenges of prostate cancer management. At the first annual USPCC meeting, areas of controversy and consensus were identified during a 2-day meeting that included expert presentations, full-panel discussions, and postdiscussion responses to questions developed by the USPCC cochairs and session moderators.

Results

This narrative review covers the USPCC expert discussion and perspectives relevant to mCRPC, including neuroendocrine/aggressive-variant prostate cancer (NEPC/AVPC). Areas of broad agreement identified among USPCC experts include the benefits of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, the use of radioligand therapy in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive mCRPC, and the need for clinical trials that address real-world clinical questions, including the performance of novel therapies when compared with modern standard-of-care treatment. Ongoing areas of controversy and uncertainty included the appropriateness of PARP inhibitors in patients with non-BRCA1/2 mutations, the optimal definition of PSMA positivity, and systemic therapies for patients with NEPC/AVPC after progression on platinum-based therapies.

Conclusions

The first annual USPCC meeting identified several areas of controversy in the management of mCRPC, highlighting the urgent need for clinical trials designed to facilitate treatment selection and sequencing in this heterogeneous disease state.

Nomogram to predict the presence of PSMA-negative but FDG-positive lesion in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicenter cohort study

Background

PSMA-negative but FDG-positive (PSMA-/FDG+) lesion in dual-tracer (68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is associated with an unfavorable response to Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617. This study sought to develop both radiomics and clinical models for the precise prediction of the presence of PSMA-/FDG+ lesions in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CPRC).

Methods

A cohort of 298 patients who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT with a less than 5-day interval was included. The evaluation of the prognostic performance of the radiomics model drew upon the survival data derived from 40 patients with CRPC treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in an external cohort. Two endpoints were evaluated: (a) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, defined as a reduction exceeding 50% from baseline and (b) overall survival (OS), measured from the initiation of 177Lu-PSMA-617 to death from any cause.

Results

PSMA-/FDG+ lesions were identified in 56 (18.8%) CRPC patients. Both radiomics (area under the curve [AUC], 0.83) and clinical models (AUC, 0.78) demonstrated robust performance in PSMA-/FDG+ lesion prediction. Decision curve analysis revealed that the radiomics model yielded a net benefit over the 'screen all' strategy at a threshold probability of ⩾4%. At a 5% probability threshold, the radiomics model facilitated a 21% reduction in 18F-FDG PET/CT scans while only missing 2% of PSMA-/FDG+ cases. Patients with a low estimated score exhibited significantly prolonged OS (hazard ratio = 0.49, p = 0.029) and a higher PSA response rate (75% versus 35%, p = 0.011) compared to those with a high estimated score.

Conclusion

This study successfully developed two models with accurate estimations of the risk associated with PSMA-/FDG+ lesions in CRPC patients. These models held potential utility in aiding the selection of candidates for 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment and guiding 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-directed radiotherapy.

Novel radionuclide therapy combinations in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer remains the commonest cancer diagnosed in males and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have progressed on chemotherapy and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) have limited treatment options, significant morbidity, and poor outcomes. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed radionuclide therapy (RNT) is emerging as an efficacious and well-tolerated therapy; however, disease progression is universal. Several ongoing RNT trials focus on combination strategies to improve efficacy and durability of treatment response, including combinations with ARPIs, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies. Further, efforts are underway to expand the role of PSMA-directed RNT to earlier stages of disease including hormone-sensitive and localized prostate cancer. In this review, we discuss the rationale and ongoing RNT combination therapeutic trials in prostate cancer and summarize the efficacy and toxicity associated with RNT.

Future directions in systemic treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

The landscape of advanced prostate cancer treatment has evolved tremendously in past decades. The treatment paradigm has shifted from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone to doublet combinations comprising ADT with docetaxel or an androgen receptor inhibitor, and now triplet therapy involving all 3 classes of agents. Robust clinical data has demonstrated survival benefits with this strategy of upfront treatment intensification. Subgroup analysis has alluded to the importance of tailoring treatment according to metastatic disease burden. However, defining the volume of disease is becoming increasingly controversial due to the advent of next generation molecular imaging. Several trials testing established agents in the castrate-resistant setting are now underway in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients. As the treatment milieu is enriched earlier in the disease trajectory, future studies should elucidate biomarkers to further define specific patient populations who will benefit most from treatment intensification and/or de-escalation, with what agents and for what duration.

Innovation in Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancers: Radiochemical Perspective and Recent Therapeutic Practices

Prostate cancer represents the second cause of death by cancer in males in western countries. While early-stage diseases are accessible to surgery and/or external radiotherapy, advanced metastatic prostate cancers are primarily treated with androgen deprivation therapy, to which new generation androgen receptor antagonists or taxane-based chemotherapies are added in the case of tumor relapse. Nevertheless, patients become invariably resistant to castration with a median survival that rarely exceeds 3 years. This fostered the search for alternative strategies, independent of the androgen receptor signaling pathway. In this line, radionuclide therapies may represent an interesting option as they could target either the microenvironment of sclerotic bone metastases with the use of radiopharmaceuticals containing samarium-153, strontium-89 or radium-223 or tumor cells expressing the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protein found at the surface of prostate cancer cells. This review gives highlights the chemical properties of radioligands targeting prostate cancer cells and recapitulates the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of radionuclide therapies, alone or in combination with other approved treatments, in patients with castration-resistant prostate tumors. It discusses some of the encouraging results obtained, especially the benefit on overall survival that was reported with [¹⁷⁷Lu]-PSMA-617. It also addresses the specific requirements for the use of this particular class of drugs, both in terms of medical staff coordination and adapted infrastructures for efficient radioprotection.

The Impact of PSMA PET-Based Eligibility Criteria Used in the Prospective Phase II TheraP Trial in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radioligand Therapy

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) has shown encouraging results for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the prospective, multicenter, randomized phase II TheraP study. The inclusion criteria for that study comprised a pretherapeutic ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan showing sufficient tumor uptake using a predefined threshold and the absence of ¹⁸F-FDG-positive, PSMA ligand-negative tumor lesions. However, the prognostic value of these PET-based inclusion criteria remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of mCRPC patients treated with PSMA RLT using TheraP as well as other TheraP-based PET inclusion criteria. Methods: First, patients were dichotomized into 2 groups whose PSMA PET scans did (TheraP contrast-enhanced PSMA [cePSMA] PET-positive) or did not (TheraP cePSMA PET-negative) fulfill the inclusion criteria of TheraP. Notably, unlike in TheraP, ¹⁸F-FDG PET was not performed on our patients. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline), PSA progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were compared. Additionally, patients were further dichotomized according to predefined SUV_max thresholds different from those used in TheraP to analyze their potential impact on outcome as well. Results: In total, 107 mCRPC patients were included in this analysis (TheraP cePSMA PET-positive, n = 77; TheraP cePSMA PET-negative, n = 30). PSA response rates were higher in TheraP cePSMA PET-positive patients than in TheraP cePSMA PET-negative patients (54.5% vs. 20%, respectively; P = 0.0012). The median PSA progression-free survival (P = 0.007) and OS (P = 0.0007) of patients were significantly longer in the TheraP cePSMA PET-positive group than in the TheraP cePSMA PET-negative group. Moreover, being in the TheraP cePSMA PET-positive group was identified as a significant prognosticator of longer OS (P = 0.003). The application of different SUV_max thresholds for a single hottest lesion demonstrated no influence on outcome in patients eligible for PSMA RLT. Conclusion: Patient selection for PSMA RLT according to the inclusion criteria of TheraP led to a better treatment response and outcome in our preselected patient cohort. However, a relevant number of patients not fulfilling these criteria also showed substantial rates of response.

177Lu-PSMA SPECT Quantitation at 6 Weeks (Dose 2) Predicts Short Progression-Free Survival for Patients Undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-I&T Therapy

177Lu-PSMA is an effective treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Our ability to assess response rates and adjust treatment may be improved using predictive tools. This study aimed to evaluate change in 177Lu-PSMA SPECT quantitative parameters to monitor treatment response. Methods: One hundred twenty-seven men with progressive mCRPC previously treated with androgen-signaling inhibition (99%) and chemotherapy (71%) received a median of 3 (interquartile range [IQR], 2-5) 8-GBq (IQR, 8-8.5 GBq) doses of 177Lu-PSMA-I&T. Imaging included 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (SUVmax > 15 at a single site and > 10 at all sites > 2 cm), diagnostic CT, and 177Lu SPECT/CT from vertex to mid thigh (24 h after treatment). 177Lu SPECT/CT quantitative analysis was undertaken at cycles 1 (baseline) and 2 (week 6) of treatment. Clinical and biochemical results were assessed to evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A PSA reduction of more than 50% was seen in 58% (74/127). The median PSA PFS was 6.1 mo (95% CI, 5.5-6.7), and OS was 16.8 mo (95% CI, 13.5-20.1). At the time of analysis, 41% (52/127) were deceased. At baseline and week 6, 76% (96/127) had analyzable serial 177Lu SPECT/CT imaging. SPECT total tumor volume (TTV) was reduced between baseline and week 6 in 74% (71/96; median, -193; IQR, -486 to -41). Any increase in SPECT TTV between baseline and week 6 was associated with significantly shorter PSA PFS (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.2; P = 0.0008) but not OS. Median PSA PFS in those with an increase in SPECT TTV was 3.7 mo (95% CI, 2.8-6.8), compared with 6.7 mo (95% CI, 5.8-10.6) in those with no increase in SPECT TTV. An increase in SPECT TTV greater than 20% was also associated with PSA PFS (hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0; P = 0.008) but less significantly than any change in SPECT TTV. There was a significant difference in PSA PFS between patients with both increased PSA and SPECT TTV and patients with reduced SPECT TTV and PSA (median, 2.8 vs. 9.0 mo; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Increasing PSMA SPECT TTV on quantitative 177Lu SPECT/CT predicts short progression-free survival and may play a future role as an imaging response biomarker, identifying when to cease or intensify 177Lu-PSMA therapy.

177Lu-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

A 76-year-old man with metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma progressing with antiandrogen and taxane therapy was treated with lutetium 177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 and showed marked biochemical and imaging response, with improvement in clinical status and osseous pain. A summary of nuclear medicine theranostics with emphasis on PSMA targeting agents is presented.

Using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Therapy Response Assessment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Application of EAU/EANM Recommendations in Clinical Practice

For patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), no reliable biomarkers for predicting therapeutic response or assisting in treatment selection and sequencing are currently available. Using the recent European Association of Urology and European Association of Nuclear Medicine recommendations, we aimed to compare response assessment between prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and conventional imaging in mCRPC patients starting first-line treatment with a novel hormonal agent (NHA) and to perform a sequential comparative analysis of PSMA PET/CT-derived parameters after 4 and 12 wk of therapy. Methods: Data from 18 mCRPC patients who started NHA treatment and underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before therapy initiation (baseline), at week 4 (W4), and at week 12 (W12) in addition to conventional imaging (bone scintigraphy, CT) at baseline and W12 were retrospectively included. PET/CT images were quantitatively analyzed for maximum and mean SUV and total PSMA ligand-positive lesions. Comparative analysis of PET/CT-derived parameters was performed, and patients were classified as having nonprogressive disease or progressive disease (PD) according to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, prostate-specific antigen, and conventional imaging criteria. Results: Treatment response was evaluable by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in 16 of 18 patients (89%) and by conventional imaging in 11 of 18 patients (61%). Five of 16 patients classified as having PD by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at W12 had already met progression criteria at W4, and substantial agreement was observed between W4 and W12 (κ, 0.74) ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. Nonetheless, 2 of 16 patients (13%) were incorrectly classified as having PD because of a flare phenomenon on PSMA PET/CT that disappeared at W12. Conclusion: Volumetric assessments of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging can improve response evaluation in NHA-treated patients with mCRPC. Although early response assessments at W4 need to be approached with caution because of flare, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging at W4 and W12 revealed substantial agreement in therapy response assessments; these findings warrant further investigation to distinguish PD from flare at W4 and help improve the understanding of resistance to therapy.

Lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

¹⁷⁷Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan is a radiopharmaceutical that selectively targets prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and delivers beta-radiations to kill prostate cancer cells.

AREAS COVERED

Extensive experience outside the United States as well as randomized phase II and phase III data demonstrate that ¹⁷⁷Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan is a safe, generally well tolerated, and effective therapy for men with mCRPC. ¹⁷⁷Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan was approved by the FDA in March 2022 for the treatment of PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after androgen receptor pathway inhibition and taxane-based chemotherapy based on the results of the VISION trial.

EXPERT OPINION

This review discusses the development and studies leading to the approval of ¹⁷⁷Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan. In all, ¹⁷⁷Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan is an exciting new tool in the arsenal for men with mCRPC after novel androgen pathway inhibitors and at least one taxane chemotherapy. Optimal selection of patients, sequencing of ¹⁷⁷Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan with the other agents available to treat mCRPC, and the use of dosimetry are current areas of interest with great potential and opportunities for further individual patient optimization using the tools of theranostics.

The 28th Annual Prostate Cancer Foundation Scientific Retreat report

BACKGROUND

The 28th Annual Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) Scientific Retreat was held virtually over 4 days, on October 28-29 and November 4-5, 2021.

METHODS

The Annual PCF Scientific Retreat is a leading global scientific conference that focuses on first-in-field, unpublished, and high-impact basic, translational, and clinical prostate cancer research, as well as research from other fields with high probability for impacting prostate cancer research and patient care.

RESULTS

Primary areas of research discussed at the 2021 PCF Retreat included: (i) prostate cancer disparities; (ii) prostate cancer survivorship; (iii) next-generation precision medicine; (iv) PSMA theranostics; (v) prostate cancer lineage plasticity; (vi) tumor metabolism as a cancer driver and treatment target; (vii) prostate cancer genetics and polygenic risk scores; (viii) glucocorticoid receptor biology in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC); (ix) therapeutic degraders; (x) new approaches for immunotherapy in prostate cancer; (xi) novel technologies to overcome the suppressive tumor microenvironment; and (xii) real-world evidence and synthetic/virtual control arms.

CONCLUSIONS

This article provides a summary of the presentations from the 2021 PCF Scientific Retreat. We hope that sharing this knowledge will help to improve the understanding of the current state of research and direct new advances in prostate cancer research and care.

Factors influencing survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer therapy

INTRODUCTION

The number of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is expecting to increase due to the long-life expectancy of those with advanced disease who are also more commonly diagnosed today because of stage migration. Several compounds are available for treating these patients.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed currently available treatments for mCRPC, their mechanism of action and resistance and we explored possible predictors of treatment success useful to predict survival in mCRPC patients.

EXPERT OPINION

A combination of molecular, clinical, pathological, and imaging features is necessary to correctly estimate patients' risk of death. The combination of these biomarkers may allow clinicians to tailor treatments based on cancer history and patients' features. The search of predictive biomarkers remains an unmet medical need for most patients with mCRPC.