Clinical Outcomes and Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Melanoma Micrometastases From an International Multicenter Study: Implications for the Management of American Joint Committee on Cancer IIIA Disease

Special Considerations for Head and Neck Melanoma

Approximately 25% of all cutaneous melanomas arise in the head and neck region. Common locations include the face (40%-60%), scalp (14%-49%), neck (20%-29%), and ear (8%-11%) with the most common locations being the occipital scalp and cheek. The complexity of the head and neck anatomic subsites makes definitive management with wide local excision and reconstruction a challenge owing to both functional and cosmetic sequela. Although complex, the key to treatment remains early diagnosis, treatment, and close multidisciplinary management.

Survival Correlates With Adjuvant Choice in Sentinel Node Positive Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma

OBJECTIVE(S)

The objective of this study is to evaluate the utilization and outcomes of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and immunotherapy for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) positive head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM).

METHODS

Patients with primary HNCM and positive SLNB in the 2020 National Cancer Database (NCDB) Melanoma file were reviewed. The frequency of CLND and immunotherapy was tracked from 2012 to 2019. Clinicodemographic features of patients were evaluated with respect to their post-SLNB treatment choice. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of diagnosis, and the association of therapy choice with survival was determined using a multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The rates of CLND declined from 66% to 18% while adjuvant immunotherapy increased to a peak of approximately 40%, with an inflection point occurring in 2016. Multivariate survival analysis indicated that immunotherapy use alone, though not CLND, was associated with improved prognosis (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.93). Patient characteristics associated with immunotherapy administration included age (p < 0.01), insurance type (p = 0.002), income (p < 0.001), and healthcare facility type (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective NCDB-based study, we find that the modern management of SLNB-positive patients has shifted towards greater use of adjuvant immunotherapy and a decline in CLND; the use of immunotherapy is associated with improved OS. Patients treated with immunotherapy were more likely to be younger, of higher income, and with private health insurance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Critical evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in pT1b and pT2a melanoma patients: A nationwide population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) aims to stage patients. According to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) staging manual, patients with pT1b or pT2a melanoma can be eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy, however, only if they have a sentinel node (SN) tumour burden > 1 mm. This study aims to determine the percentage of patients with pT1b or pT2a that will become eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy following SLNB.

METHODS

A nationwide, population-based study was conducted using data from the Dutch Pathology Databank. Patients diagnosed with pT1b and pT2a melanoma between 2002 and 2023 were included. The primary endpoint was the number of SNs with a tumour burden > 1 mm.

RESULTS

We identified 36,606 patients of who 16,042 underwent SLNB. SN positivity was 5 % for patients with pT1b melanoma, and 11 % for pT2a melanoma. A tumour burden > 1 mm was found in 1.5 % and 4.1 %, translating to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 69 for pT1b and 25 for pT2a.

CONCLUSION

This nationwide study demonstrated a low incidence of positive SNs and minimal likelihood of significant clinical outcomes following SLNB. Given the high NNT to be eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy, SLNB may no longer be justified for pT1b melanoma. For patients with pT2a melanoma, SLNB should be considered carefully, balancing limited clinical benefits against potential risks.

Changes in the surgical management of melanoma and measures to implement change

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous malignant melanoma has traditionally been a surgically managed disease. Recent clinical trials highlight major shifts in surgical management of this disease, emphasizing a multidisciplinary approach.

METHODS

Clinical trials evaluating the role of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in the management of sentinel lymph node positive patients and more recent trials evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on patients presenting with clinically advanced but surgically resectable melanoma are reviewed, as well as ongoing trial evaluating surgical margins.

RESULTS

Both DeCOG and MSLT-II trials confirmed that CLND is no longer standard management of the sentinel node positive patient. CLND offers no melanoma-specific survival benefit. Associated surgical morbidity justifies a surveillance and observation approach, combined with adjuvant therapy. Patients presenting with clinically advanced surgically resectable disease are best served by neoadjuvant therapy. This approach demonstrates significantly improved melanoma-specific survival compared to upfront surgery, underscoring the need for rapid adoption by surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in surgical management of melanoma have been dramatic and offer patients improved outcomes though both reduction in the magnitude of surgery, as well as improved disease specific survival for patients with advanced surgically resectable disease.

Adjuvant Systemic Immunotherapies for Resected Stage III Melanoma: A Single-Centre Retrospective Clinical Practice Review

Melanoma poses significant challenges due to its resistance to conventional therapies and increasing incidence rates. Stage III melanoma, characterised by regional lymph node involvement, has a high risk of recurrence despite surgical resection. Adjuvant immunotherapy, particularly using the PD-1 inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab, has shown promising results in improving recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in Stage III melanoma patients. This retrospective analysis examined the effects of adjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab on patients with Stage III melanoma treated in a tertiary oncology centre. Of the 110 patients, 95 received pembrolizumab and 15 received nivolumab. The pembrolizumab completion rate was 62.1%, with 31.2% discontinuing due to disease progression or adverse effects. The nivolumab completion rate was lower at 40%, with 60% discontinuing due to toxicity or disease progression. Grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed in 17% of pembrolizumab and 53.3% of nivolumab patients. Disease progression occurred in 27.4% of pembrolizumab and 26.7% of nivolumab patients. Pembrolizumab showed a 12-month RFS of 78.9% and 24-month RFS of 77.6%, with an OS of 97.9% at 12 months. Nivolumab exhibited a 12-month RFS of 86.7% and 24-month RFS of 80%. RFS rates varied by disease stage and mutation status. Adjuvant pembrolizumab and nivolumab both demonstrate efficacy in improving RFS and OS in Stage III melanoma patients. Pembrolizumab has higher completion rates and fewer toxicities compared to nivolumab. Further studies are warranted to explore long-term outcomes and optimise treatment strategies.

Annals of Surgical Oncology Practice Guidelines Series: Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Melanoma

Surgery has always been the mainstay of melanoma treatment, but the risk of recurrence after curative-intent surgery remains high for some stages of the disease. In this Annals of Surgical Oncology Guidelines Review, we provide an overview of practice changing studies, review international guidelines, and highlight current recommendations and areas of controversy when treating melanoma patients in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. Recent clinical trials have established important roles for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in conjunction with surgery for selected patients with stage II, stage III, and even resectable stage IV melanoma. Patients with melanoma should be evaluated for multimodality therapy, including a combination of surgery, systemic therapy (i.e., BRAF-targeted therapy or checkpoint blockade immunotherapy), and at times radiotherapy. With the rapid pace of advances in the field, it is crucial for surgical oncologists to remain updated on the latest guidelines and recommendations for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy and to continue to be leaders in this paradigm shift. Given the complex and evolving nature of treatment, this report reviews the latest practice guidelines in the context of modern multidisciplinary management of melanoma.

Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Stage II Melanoma: Current Paradigms in Management and Future Directions

Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States and accounts for the majority of all skin cancer-related deaths, making it the most lethal cutaneous malignancy. Systemic adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-IV melanoma is now approved for patients who have undergone surgical resection, given the appreciable risk of recurrence and mortality in this patient population. Despite the lower stage, high-risk stage II melanoma (stage IIB/IIC) can often exhibit an even more aggressive course when compared to stage IIIA/IIIB disease, thus justifying consideration of adjuvant therapy in these patients. In this review, we highlight the current standard of practice for the treatment of stage IIB/C melanoma, with a focus on adjuvant therapies supported by published landmark clinical trials, including anti-PD-1 therapy. Notably, adjuvant therapies approved thus far in this patient population have demonstrated an improvement in recurrence-free survival, while their impact on overall survival is pending. Finally, this review highlights currently ongoing trials and future directions for research and treatment possibilities for high-risk clinical stage II melanoma.

Prevalence and odds of anxiety and depression in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a proportional meta-analysis and regression

BACKGROUND

The psychological burden of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CM) is all-encompassing, affecting treatment adherence, recurrence and mortality. However, the prevalence and risk factors of anxiety and depression in CM remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To establish a benchmark pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression in CM, to provide magnitudes of association for clinical, therapeutic and demographic correlates, and to elucidate temporal trends in anxiety and depression from the time of diagnosis.

METHODS

This review followed the MOOSE guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were queried from database inception to 24 August 2023. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent authors, utilizing both the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and National Institutes of Health risk-of-bias tools for the latter. The GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Prevalence rates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and prediction intervals (PIs) were derived using a random-effects model and estimating between- and within-study variance.

RESULTS

Nine longitudinal and 29 cross-sectional studies were included (7995 patients). Based on the JBI and NIH tools, respectively, quality assessment found 20 and 17 to be at low risk of bias, 12 and 15 to be at moderate risk and 6 and 5 to be at high risk of bias. The prevalence of anxiety [30.6% (95% CI 24.6-37.0; PI 18-47%)] and depression [18.4% (95% CI 13.4-23.9; PI 10-33%)] peaked during treatment, declining to pretreatment levels after 1 year [anxiety: 48% vs. 20% (P = 0.005); depression: 28% vs. 13% (P = 0.03)]. Female sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3; P < 0.001], age < 60 years (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0; P = 0.002) and low educational level (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0; P < 0.001) were likely to result in a large increase in the odds of anxiety. Depression was 12.3% higher in those with stage IV vs. those with stage I CM (P = 0.05). Relative to immune checkpoint inhibition, the rates of depression were 22% (P = 0.002) and 34% (P < 0.001) higher among patients with advanced-stage CM receiving interferon-α and chemotherapy, respectively. A significant reduction in self-reported depression scores was demonstrated over time (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Notably, anxiety and depression in CM affect women, those younger than 60 years of age and the less educated, with up to 80% higher odds of anxiety in these groups. Anxiety and depression surge during chemotherapy and interferon treatment, especially in advanced CM. Our findings facilitate risk stratification and underscore the need for multidisciplinary vigilance.

Isolated melanoma cells in sentinel lymph node in stage IIIA melanoma correlate with a favorable prognosis similar to stage IB

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition (AJCC v8) defines sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) containing any tumor cells as positive SLN. Consequently, even thin melanomas with isolated tumor cells (ic) in SLN are classified as stage IIIA, making them candidates for adjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS

We aimed to evaluate survival outcomes of melanoma stage IIIA (ic) and compare them with stage IIIA with lymph node (LN) metastases > 0.1 mm. Primary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS). Secondary endpoint was melanoma specific survival (MSS).

RESULTS

The discovery cohort from the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, included 237 patients; confirmation cohort included 143 patients from the DeCOG trial. The Tuebingen cohort included 95 patients with stage IIIA (ic) and 142 patients with stage IIIA. The DeCOG trial included 39 patients with stage IIIA (ic) and 104 patients with stage IIIA. In the Tuebingen cohort, 10-year RFS rates for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA were 84% (95% CI 75-94) and 49% (95% CI 39-59), respectively (p < 0.001). 10-year DMFS rates for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA were 89% (95% CI 81-97) and 56% (95% CI 45-67), respectively; (p < 0.001). In the DeCOG cohort, 10-year RFS for stage IIIA (ic) and stage IIIA were 88% (95% CI 78-99) and 35% (95% CI 7-62), respectively; (p = 0.009). 10-year DMFS for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA was 88% (95% CI 77-99) and 60% (95% CI 39-80), respectively (p = 0.061).

CONCLUSION

Stage IIIA (ic) melanoma exhibits a prognosis similar to stage IB. Recommendation of adjuvant therapy in Stage IIIA (ic) warrants thorough discussion.

Educational Review: Clinical Application of Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Melanoma

In the last decade, immunotherapy has become the cornerstone in the management of patients with melanoma, the foremost cause of skin-cancer-related death in the USA. The emergence of immune checkpoint blockade as a crucial element in current immunotherapy and combination strategies has significantly transformed the treatments of resectable and advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma. This paper reviews the landmark clinical trials that formed the basis of management of melanoma in the perioperative and metastatic setting. Furthermore, we discuss the rationale for the applications of PD-1 blockade and its combination with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-LAG-3. The review also explores new experimental combinations of PD-1 blockade with other immunomodulatory agents, including targeted therapies, anti-TIGIT antibodies, TLR-9 agonists, antiangiogenic agents, and mRNA vaccines.

Presence of low volume metastases does not alter management in node-negative, early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

This study sought to determine if patients with early stage cervical cancer who possessed intermediate-high risk factors (defined by Peters or Sedlis criteria) and had pathologically negative lymph nodes at the time of surgery had higher rates of low volume metastases (LVM) on retrospective ultrastaging.

Methods

This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study collected data via chart review on early stage, surgically-treated node-negative cervical cancer patients who underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy, treated at a single institution from January 2011 through June 2021. Nodal blocks were retrospectively ultrastaged per standard protocol. Descriptive statistics were performed for analysis.

Results

Over the 10-year study period, n = 20 patients met study inclusion criteria. Most patients were white with squamous cell histology, with a mean number of 25.15 (SD = 12) nodes examined on initial pathologic evaluation. 85 % (n = 17) patients were pathologic stage IB. 85 % of the cohort were recommended for adjuvant radiation, with the remaining 15 % for cisplatin-based chemoradiation. LVM in the form of micrometastasis was retrospectively identified in one patient (5 %) who had received whole pelvic radiation and recurred locally within the irradiated field.

Conclusions

This small retrospective series of surgically managed cervical cancer with intermediate-high risk tumor factors identified only 1 patient with LVM, representing 5% of the total population. The biologic importance of ITC and LVM remains unclear in cervical cancer, however this investigation highlights the low incidence even when all nodes are evaluated in a higher risk cohort. The presence of LVM would not have changed management decisions based on this retrospective analysis.

Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: ASCO Guideline Update Q and A

This Q&A answers questions regarding ASCO's recent Systemic Therapy for Melanoma guideline.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma, version 3.0

Since the first approval for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma more than a decade ago, immunotherapy has completely transformed the treatment landscape of this chemotherapy-resistant disease. Combination regimens including ICIs directed against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) with anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) agents or, more recently, anti-lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) agents, have gained regulatory approvals for the treatment of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, with long-term follow-up data suggesting the possibility of cure for some patients with advanced disease. In the resectable setting, adjuvant ICIs prolong recurrence-free survival, and neoadjuvant strategies are an active area of investigation. Other immunotherapy strategies, such as oncolytic virotherapy for injectable cutaneous melanoma and bispecific T-cell engager therapy for HLA-A*02:01 genotype-positive uveal melanoma, are also available to patients. Despite the remarkable efficacy of these regimens for many patients with cutaneous melanoma, traditional immunotherapy biomarkers (ie, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, T-cell infiltrate and/or microsatellite stability) have failed to reliably predict response. Furthermore, ICIs are associated with unique toxicity profiles, particularly for the highly active combination of anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 agents. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop this clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma, including rare subtypes of the disease (eg, uveal, mucosal), with the goal of improving patient care by providing guidance to the oncology community. Drawing from published data and clinical experience, the Expert Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for healthcare professionals using immunotherapy to treat melanoma, with topics including therapy selection in the advanced and perioperative settings, intratumoral immunotherapy, when to use immunotherapy for patients with BRAFV600-mutated disease, management of patients with brain metastases, evaluation of treatment response, special patient populations, patient education, quality of life, and survivorship, among others.

The "Great Debate" at Melanoma Bridge 2022, Naples, December 1st-3rd, 2022

The Great Debate session at the 2022 Melanoma Bridge congress (December 1-3) featured counterpoint views from leading experts on five contemporary topics of debate in the management of melanoma. The debates considered the choice of anti-lymphocyte-activation gene (LAG)-3 therapy or ipilimumab in combination with anti-programmed death (PD)-1 therapy, whether anti-PD-1 monotherapy is still acceptable as a comparator arm in clinical trials, whether adjuvant treatment of melanoma is still a useful treatment option, the role of adjuvant therapy in stage II melanoma, what role surgery will continue to have in the treatment of melanoma. As is customary in the Melanoma Bridge Great Debates, the speakers are invited by the meeting Chairs to express one side of the assigned debate and the opinions given may not fully reflect personal views. Audiences voted in favour of either side of the argument both before and after each debate.

Risk Stratification of Sentinel Node Metastasis Disease Burden and Phenotype in Stage III Melanoma Patients

BACKGROUND

Currently, all patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pT2b-pT4b melanomas and a positive sentinel node biopsy are now considered for adjuvant systemic therapy without consideration of the burden of disease in the metastatic nodes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 1377 pT1-pT4b melanoma patients treated at an academic cancer center. Standard variables regarding patient, primary tumor, and sentinel node characteristics, in addition to sentinel node metastasis maximum tumor deposit size (MTDS) in millimeters and extracapsular spread (ECS) status, were analyzed for predicting disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

The incidence of SN+ was 17.3% (238/1377) and ECS was 10.5% (25/238). Increasing AJCC N stage was associated with worse DSS. There was no difference in DSS between the IIIB and IIIC groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the optimal MTDS cut-point was 0.7 mm for the pT1b-pT4a SN+ subgroups, but there was no cut-point for the pT4b SN+ subgroup. Patients with MTDS <0.7 mm and no ECS had similar survival outcomes as the N0 patients with the same T stage. Nodal risk categories were developed using the 0.7 mm MTDS cut-point and ECS status. The incidence of low-risk disease, according to the new nodal risk model, was 22.3% (53/238) in the stage III cohort, with 49% (26/53) in the pT2b-pT3a and pT3b-pT4a subgroups and none in the pT4b subgroup. Similar outcomes were observed for overall and distant metastasis-free survival.

CONCLUSION

We propose a more granular classification system, based on tumor burden and ECS status in the sentinel node, that identifies low-risk patients in the AJCC IIIB and IIIC subgroups who may otherwise be observed.

The Evolution of the Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma

The growing repertoire of approved immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy has revolutionized the adjuvant treatment of melanoma. While the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma remains wide local excision (WLE), the management of regional lymph nodes continues to evolve in light of practice-changing clinical trials and dramatically improved adjuvant therapy. With large multicenter studies reporting no benefit in overall survival for completion lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), controversy remains regarding patient selection and clinical decision-making. This review explores the evolution of the SLNB in cutaneous melanoma in the context of a rapidly changing adjuvant treatment landscape, summarizing the key clinical trials which shaped current practice guidelines.

Diagnostic biopsy of cutaneous melanoma, sentinel lymph node biopsy and indications for lymphadenectomy

The incidence of cutaneous melanoma appears to be increasing worldwide and this is attributed to solar radiation exposure. Early diagnosis is a challenging task. Any clinically suspected lesion must be assessed by complete diagnostic excision biopsy (margins 1-2 mm); however, there are other biopsy techniques that are less commonly used. Melanomas are characterized by Breslow thickness as thin (< 1 mm), intermediate (1-4 mm) and thick (> 4 mm). This thickness determines their biological behavior, therapy, prognosis and survival. If the biopsy is positive, a wide local excision (margins 1-2 cm) is finally performed. However, metastasis to regional lymph nodes is the most accurate prognostic determinant. Therefore, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for diagnosed melanoma plays a pivotal role in the management strategy. Complete lymph node clearance has undoubted advantages and is recommended in all cases of positive SLN biopsy. A PET-CT (positron emission tomography-computed tomography) scan is necessary for staging and follow-up after treatment. Novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies have shown improved outcomes in advanced cases.

Melanoma lymph node metastases - moving beyond quantity in clinical trial design and contemporary practice

The presence of lymph node metastases is a well-studied prognostic factor for cutaneous melanoma. Characterization of melanoma lymph node metastases and their association with survival in multiple, large observational studies has led to recognition of the following high-risk features: quantity of lymph node metastases (number of nodes), size of the nodal tumor deposit (in mm), and extracapsular extension. Despite increasing utilization of these features in the design of randomized clinical trials, in addition to their role in contemporary clinical decision-making, current staging systems lag behind, only accounting for the quantity of lymph nodes with metastases. Herein, we review the prognostic role of melanoma lymph node metastases and their high-risk features, current reporting standards, how such features have been utilized in practice-changing trials, and best practices for future clinical trial design and clinical decision-making.