First-Line Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy Versus Placebo + Chemotherapy for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Final Overall Survival Results of KEYNOTE-826

Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in individuals with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

METHODS

Databases from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were all thoroughly searched for pertinent research. Outcomes include complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), disease progression (PD), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and adverse events (AEs) were retrieved for further analysis.

RESULTS

Ten trials with 721 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results for patients with cervical cancer receiving pembrolizumab were as follows: CR (0.06, 95%CI: 0.02-0.10), PR (0.15, 95%CI: 0.08-0.22), SD (0.16, 95%CI: 0.13-0.20), PD (0.50, 95%CI: 0.25-0.75), ORR (0.26, 95%CI: 0.11-0.41) and DCR (0.42, 95%CI: 0.13-0.71), respectively. Regarding survival analysis, the pooled mPFS and mOS were 3.81 and 10.15 months. Subgroup analysis showed that pembrolizumab in combination was more beneficial in CR (0.16 vs. 0.03, p = 0.012), PR (0.24 vs. 0.08, p = 0.032), SD (0.11 vs. 0.19, p = 0.043), ORR (0.42 vs. 0.11, p = 0.014), and mPFS (5.54 months vs. 2.27 months, p < 0.001) than as single agent. The three most common AEs were diarrhoea (0.25), anaemia (0.25), and nausea (0.21), and the incidence of grade 3-5 AEs was significantly lower, rarely surpassing 0.10.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that pembrolizumab had a favourable efficacy and tolerability. Future research will primarily focus on optimising customised regiments that optimally integrate pembrolizumab into new therapies and combination strategies. Designed to maximise patient benefit and efficiently control adverse effects while maintaining a high standard of living.

Nutrition's checkpoint inhibition: The impact of nutrition on immunotherapy outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To determine if nutritional status effects response to immunotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on gynecologic cancer patients who received immunotherapy at a single institution between 2015 and 2022. Immunotherapy included checkpoint inhibitors and tumor vaccines. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was calculated from serum albumin levels and total lymphocyte count. PNI values were determined at the beginning of treatment for each patient and assessed for their association with immunotherapy response. Disease control response (DCR) as an outcome of immunotherapy was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-eight patients received immunotherapy (IT) between 2015 and 2022. The gynecological cancers treated were uterine (38%), cervix (32%), ovarian (25%), and vulvar or vaginal (4%) cancers. The mean PNI for responders was higher than the non-responder group (p < 0.05). The AUC value for PNI as a predictor of response was 49. A PNI value of 49 was 43% sensitive and 85% specific for predicting a DCR. In Cox proportional hazards analysis, after adjusting for ECOG score and the number of prior chemotherapy lines, severe malnutrition was associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.85, p = 0.08) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 3.82, p < 0.001). Patients with PNI < 49 were at a higher risk of IT failure (HR = 2.24, p = 0.0001) and subsequent death (HR = 2.84, p = 9 × 10-5).

CONCLUSIONS

PNI can be a prognostic marker to predict response rates of patients with gynecologic cancers treated with immunotherapy. Additional studies needed to understand the mechanistic role of malnutrition in immunotherapy response.

Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

At the first interim analysis of the phase 3 ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemoradiotherapy provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. We report the overall survival results from the second interim analysis of this study.

METHODS

Eligible patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB with node-positive disease or stage III-IVA regardless of nodal status), locally advanced, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cervical cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive five cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab (400 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks. Pembrolizumab or placebo and cisplatin were administered intravenously. Patients were stratified at randomisation by planned external beam radiotherapy type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT] vs non-IMRT or non-VMAT), cervical cancer stage at screening (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB node positive vs III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) dose (<70 Gy vs ≥70 Gy [equivalent dose of 2 Gy]). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by investigator or by histopathological confirmation of suspected disease progression and overall survival defined as the time from randomisation to death due to any cause. Safety was a secondary endpoint.

FINDINGS

Between June 9, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 1060 patients at 176 sites in 30 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America were randomly assigned to treatment, with 529 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 531 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. At the protocol-specified second interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 8, 2024), median follow-up was 29·9 months (IQR 23·3-34·3). Median overall survival was not reached in either group; 36-month overall survival was 82·6% (95% CI 78·4-86·1) in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 74·8% (70·1-78·8) in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. The hazard ratio for death was 0·67 (95% CI 0·50-0·90; p=0·0040), meeting the protocol-specified primary objective. 413 (78%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 371 (70%) of 530 in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group had a grade 3 or higher adverse event, with anaemia, white blood cell count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased being the most common adverse events. Potentially immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 206 (39%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 90 (17%) of 530 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04221945.

INTERPRETATION

Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy significantly improved overall survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer These data, together with results from the first interim analysis, support this immuno-chemoradiotherapy strategy as a new standard of care for this population.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of angiogenesis inhibitors used to treat cervical cancer: current and future

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of advanced cervical cancer is continuously developing. There is a critical need to explore new treatment options to improve cure rates and make treatment more affordable. Despite efforts in prevention, cervical cancer remains the fourth most common cancer worldwide in terms of both incidence and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This article offers an updated and critical analysis of angiogenesis inhibitors used in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. It should be noted that this is not a systematic review.

EXPERT OPINION

Bevacizumab is currently the primary antiangiogenic agent used alongside chemotherapy and has become the standard of care for advanced cervical cancer. However, there are still uncertainties regarding the molecular mechanisms and associations in cervical cancer that could help in optimizing the use of Bevacizumab. Factors such as cost, toxicity, and methodological issues in the GOG-240 trial must be considered.

Cervical cancer: Part II the landscape of treatment for persistent, recurrent and metastatic diseases (I)

The WHO (World Health Organization) conducted an elimination of cervical cancer program using triple pillar intervention strategy to target 90%-70%-90% of women before the year 2030, including (1) a full vaccination of HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccine to 90% of girls <15 years of age; (2) a high-performance screening procedure to 70% of women during the reproductive age (at the age of 35 and 45 years of age); and (3) an appropriate and adequate treatment to 90% of women with confirmed diagnosis of cervical lesions. Among the aforementioned three pillars, a full HPV vaccination has been introduced in our previous review, of which we have discussed the policy and strategy of HPV vaccination in the world and also reviewed the efficacy of HPV vaccination, with a successful reduction of over 90% of HPV-associated neoplasms. The aims of the current review will target another pillar-an appropriate and adequate treatment to 90% of women with confirmed diagnosis of cervical lesions. Since the early-stage cervical cancer has a favorable outcome and the treatment recommendation has been established, therefore, the current review focuses on women with persistent, recurrent and metastatic cervical cancers (advanced cervical cancers), which are still a biggest challenge based on its extremely worse outcomes before the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Integration of ICIs into conventional chemotherapy (paclitaxel-cisplatin) has become the new standard therapy for those patients with advanced cervical cancers. The recent clinical trials, such as KENOTE 826 and KENOTE A18 showing a dramatical improvement of both progression free survival and overall survival have approved the therapeutic efficacy of this combination as ICI plus paclitaxel-platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) with/without bevacizumab to women with persistent, recurrent and metastatic cervical cancers.

Surgery-based radiation-free multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer

The current review described a 55-year woman using 28 months to finish her surgery-based radiation-free multimodality treatment journey to fight International Federation of Gynaecology & Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 clinical stage IIA2 (cT2aN0M0) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix. She received six cycles of perioperative adjuvant therapy, including three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and three cycles of postoperative adjuvant therapy by using combination of dose-dense chemotherapy (CT, weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2+triweekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2), immunotherapy (IO, triweekly pembrolizumab 200 mg) and half-dose anti-angiogenic agent (triweekly bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg) plus interval radical surgery (radical hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy + bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection + para-aortic lymph node sampling) and following maintenance therapy with monthly 22 cycles of half-dose of IO (pembrolizumab 100 mg) and concomitant 4 cycles of single-agent CT (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2) and 18 cycles of half-dose anti-angiogenic agent (bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg). During the cervical SCC fighting journey, two unwanted adverse events (AEs) occurred. One was pseudo-progressive disease during the NAT treatment and pathology-confirmed upgrading FIGO stage IIIC1p (ypT2a1N1M0) after radical surgery and the other was the occurrence of hypothyroidism during the post operative adjuvant therapy. Based on this case we presented, we review the recent trend in the management of women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) using the radiation-free but surgery-based multimodality strategy and highlight the strengths and limitations about perioperative adjuvant therapy with dose-dense CT + IO + half-dose anti-angiogenic agent and maintenance treatment of half-dose IO combining with short-term single agent CT and following long-term half-dose anti-angiogenic agent. All underscore the possibility that women with LACC have an opportunity to receive surgery-based RT-free multi-modality strategy to manage their diseases with satisfactory results. Additionally, the evolving role of IO plus CT with/without anti-angiogenic agent functioning as either primary treatment or adjuvant therapy for the treatment of advanced CC has been in process continuously. Moreover, the patient's positive response to IO, pembrolizumab as an example, both during the primary and maintenance therapy, highlights the importance of integrating IO into CT regimens for CC, especially in cases where conventional therapies, RT as an example, are insufficient or who do not want to receive RT-based treatment. The sustained disease-free status of the patient over several years reinforces the potential of IO to significantly increase long-term survival outcomes in CC patients, particularly for those with LACC.

SEOM-GEICO Clinical Guidelines on cervical cancer (2023)

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of mortality in women worldwide. It is strongly associated with high-risk human papillomavirus infection. High-income countries that have implemented human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and screening programs have seen dramatic reductions in CC incidence, while developing countries where these programs are not available continue to experience high rates of CC deaths. In early-stage CC, the primary treatment is surgery or radiotherapy, whereas concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) remains the conventional approach in locally advanced stages until the upcoming approval of immunotherapy. The incorporation of immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) in first line and as monotherapy in second line after platinum-based chemotherapy, has significantly increased overall survival (OS) in recurrent or metastatic CC. The purpose of this guideline is to summarize the most relevant evidence in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CC and to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in locally advanced cervical cancer staging

OBJECTIVE

Peritoneal involvement may be overlooked in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). This may lead to underestimation of prognosis and to undertreatment limited to locoregional disease locations. However, staging laparoscopy in LACC is not routinely performed. The primary aim of this study was to determine the proportion of peritoneal metastasis by laparoscopy and the factors associated with peritoneal metastasis in patients with LACC. Secondary aims were to evaluate the performance of staging imaging in detecting peritoneal disease and the prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastasis.

METHODS

Retrospective single-institution study including consecutive patients with newly diagnosed LACC (FIGO 2018 stage IB3 and IIA2-IVA) between 06/2015 and 06/2020. All women underwent PET/CT scan, MRI scan and diagnostic laparoscopy at the time of examination under anesthesia (EUA), as part of cervical cancer staging. Peritoneal metastasis was histologically confirmed in all cases.

RESULTS

251 patients were included. 33 (13.2 %) had peritoneal metastasis. The treatment plan was changed for 28/33 (84.8 %) patients with peritoneal metastasis (11.1 % of the entire LACC cohort). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that grade 3 (OR:1.572, 95%CI:1.021-2.419; p = 0.040) and AJCC stage T3-4 (OR:3.435, 95%CI:1.482-7.960; p = 0.004) were variables associated with increased risk of peritoneal metastasis. Sensitivity of PET/CT-scan and MRI-scan in detecting peritoneal metastasis was 4.5 % (95%CI:0.1-22.8) and 13.8 % (95%CI:3.9-31.7), respectively. Peritoneal metastasis was independently associated with worse PFS and OS (HR:3.008, 95%CI:1.779-5.087, p < 0.001 and HR:4.078, 95%CI:2.232-7.451; p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

LACC patients with grade 3 histology and/or AJCC stage T3-4 had high-risk of peritoneal metastasis and diagnostic laparoscopy might be considered as part of cervical cancer staging in these patients. Peritoneal metastasis was an independent factor associated with worse PFS and OS.

The Effects of Gynecological Tumor Irradiation on the Immune System

Radiobiology has evolved from a mechanistic model based on DNA damage and response factors into a more complex model that includes effects on the immune system and the tumor microenvironment (TME). Irradiation has an immunomodulatory effect that can manifest as increased anti-tumor immunity or immunosuppression. Irradiation promotes an inflammatory microenvironment through the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and endothelial damage, which recruit immune system cells to the irradiated area. Radiation-induced immunogenic cell death (ICD), characterized by the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and tumor antigens, triggers an anti-tumor immune response of both innate and adaptive immunity. Anti-tumor immunity can manifest at a distance from the irradiated area, a phenomenon known as the abscopal effect (AE), which involves dendritic cells and CD8+ T cells. Irradiation also produces an immunosuppressive effect mediated by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs), which counterbalances the immunostimulatory effect. In this work, we review the mechanisms involved in the radiation-induced immune response, which support the combined treatment of RT and immunotherapy, focusing, where possible, on gynecologic cancer.

A non-comparative, randomized, phase II trial of atezolizumab or atezolizumab plus tiragolumab for programmed death-ligand 1-positive recurrent cervical cancer (SKYSCRAPER-04)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate tiragolumab (anti-TIGIT) and atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) as second- or third-line therapy for PD-L1-positive persistent/recurrent cervical cancer.

METHODS

In the open-label, non-comparative, randomized phase II SKYSCRAPER-04 trial (NCT04300647), patients with PD-L1-positive (SP263 tumor area positivity ≥5%) recurrent/persistent cervical cancer after 1-2 chemotherapy lines (≥1 platinum-based) were randomized 3:1 to atezolizumab 1200 mg with/without tiragolumab 600 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were performance status, prior (chemo)radiotherapy, and disease status. The primary endpoint was independent review committee-assessed confirmed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 in patients receiving tiragolumab plus atezolizumab. An objective response rate ≥21% (one-sample z-test p≤0.0245) was required for statistical significance versus a historical reference.

RESULTS

Protocol-defined independent review committee-assessed objective response rates were 19.0% (95% CI 12.6 to 27.0) in 126 patients receiving tiragolumab plus atezolizumab (p=0.0787 vs historical reference) and 15.6% (95% CI 6.5 to 29.5) in 45 atezolizumab-treated patients. Response rates were higher in PD-L1high (tumor area positivity ≥10%) than PD-L1low (tumor area positivity 5%-9%) subgroups with both regimens. At 8.5 months' median follow-up, independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.7 to 4.1) with tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and 1.9 months (95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) with atezolizumab. In post hoc analyses (10.4 months' median follow-up), median overall survival was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.6 to 14.5) with the combination and 10.6 months (95% CI 6.9 to 13.8) with atezolizumab (crossover permitted). In the combination group, 3% of patients had adverse events requiring treatment discontinuation and 8% had grade ≥3 adverse events of special interest; corresponding values in the single-agent arm were 4% and 11%. There were no treatment-related deaths or new safety findings.

CONCLUSION

The objective response rate with the tiragolumab-plus-atezolizumab combination was numerically higher than the historical reference but did not reach statistical significance.

Pharmacotherapy for cervical cancer: current standard of care and new perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer, while highly preventable, remains an international public health challenge especially in under resourced regions. Although early-stage cervix confined cancers are often amenable to surgical resection, larger tumors deemed locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) necessitate systemic therapy as part of chemoradiation therapy. Moreover, systemic therapy is the standard therapeutic approach for those presenting with primary metastasis or recurrence.

AREAS COVERED

While several agents have been approved to treat recurrent cervical cancer including checkpoint inhibitors as well as both biomarker agnostic and specific antibody drug conjugates, the development of agents added to chemoradiation has been less fruitful. Until recently, the addition of novel therapies to chemoradiation has been negative in terms of improving outcomes; however, results of a recent Phase III clinical trial (NCT04221945) in LACC demonstrated that the addition of pembrolizumab to standard of care chemoradiation was associated with an improvement in progression-free survival and resulted in an FDA approval for this therapy. This observation led to the first change in treating LACC since the early 2000s.

EXPERT OPINION

Improvements in systemic therapy both alone and in combination with chemoradiation for cervical cancer have been realized. Ongoing research is needed for therapeutic options following immunotherapy.

Top advances of the year: Cervical cancer

The year 2023 was an extraordinary year for the further development and expansion of novel treatments for all patients with cervical cancer, ranging from early stage to later stage and metastatic or recurrent disease. Individuals with early-stage disease will benefit from less invasive surgery with subsequent improvement in quality of life. The effectiveness of immunotherapy has been demonstrated in upfront, locally advanced cervical cancer and confirmed in advanced metastatic disease. Induction chemotherapy will play a role in some patients with locally advanced disease, particularly those in low resource areas of the world. Novel therapeutics including antibody-drug conjugates have shown efficacy even in pretreated patients. As we continue to explore innovative therapeutics in this space, however, we must also continue to improve the diversity of clinical trial accrual to allow for generalizable results. At the same time, we must focus on eradicating this disease with appropriate screening and vaccination.

The Polish Society of Gynecological Oncology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Cancer (v2024.0)

Background: Recent publications underscore the need for updated recommendations addressing less radical surgery for <2 cm tumors, induction chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for locally advanced stages of cervical cancer, as well as for the systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Aim: To summarize the current evidence for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cervical cancer and provide evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. Methods: Developed according to AGREE II standards, the guidelines classify scientific evidence based on the Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System criteria. Recommendations are graded by evidence strength and consensus level from the development group. Key Results: (1) Early-Stage Cancer: Stromal invasion and lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) from pretreatment biopsy identify candidates for surgery, particularly for simple hysterectomy. (2) Surgical Approach: Minimally invasive surgery is not recommended, except for T1A, LVSI-negative tumors, due to a reduction in life expectancy. (3) Locally Advanced Cancer: concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) followed by brachytherapy (BRT) is the cornerstone treatment. Low-risk patients (fewer than two metastatic nodes or FIGO IB2-II) may consider induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by CCRT and BRT after 7 days. High-risk patients (two or more metastatic nodes or FIGO IIIA, IIIB, and IVA) benefit from pembrolizumab with CCRT and maintenance therapy. (4) Metastatic, Persistent, and Recurrent Cancer: A PD-L1 status from pretreatment biopsy identifies candidates for Pembrolizumab with available systemic treatment, while triplet therapy (Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab/chemotherapy) becomes a PD-L1-independent option. Conclusions: These evidence-based guidelines aim to improve clinical outcomes through precise treatment strategies based on individual risk factors, predictors, and disease stages.

Guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology for anatomopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular testing in female tumors

INTRODUCTION

Precision medicine has revolutionized oncology, providing more personalized diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for patients with cancer. In the context of female-specific tumors, such as breast, ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer, proper tissue collection and handling are essential for obtaining tissue, immunohistochemical (IHC), and molecular data to guide therapeutic decisions.

OBJECTIVES

To establish guidelines for the collection and handling of tumor tissue, to enhance the quality of samples for histopathological, IHC, genomic, and molecular analyses. These guidelines are fundamental in informing therapeutic decisions in cancer treatment.

METHOD

The guidelines were developed by a multidisciplinary panel of renowned specialists between June 12, 2013 and February 12, 2024. Initially, the panel deliberated on critical and controversial topics related to conducting precision medicine studies focusing on female tumors. Subsequently, 22 pivotal topics were identified within the framework and assigned to groups. These groups reviewed relevant literature and drafted preliminary recommendations. Following this, the recommendations were reviewed by the coordinators and received unanimous approval. Finally, the groups made the final adjustments, classified the level of evidence, and ranked the recommendations.

CONCLUSION

The collection of surgical samples requires minimum quality standards to enable histopathological, IHC, genomic, and molecular analyses. These analyses provide crucial data for informing therapeutic decisions, significantly impacting potential survival gains for patients with female tumors.

The evolving role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cervical and endometrial cancer

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for numerous tumor types, including cervical and endometrial cancers. Multiple ICIs against programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in controlled clinical studies for advanced cervical and endometrial cancers. For advanced cervical cancer, approved ICIs as second-line treatment include cemiplimab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab as single agents. In the first-line treatment setting, options include pembrolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab, as well as atezolizumab combined with a backbone platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Additionally, for locally advanced cervical cancer, pembrolizumab is recommended alongside concurrent chemoradiotherapy. For endometrial cancer, pembrolizumab monotherapy, pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib, and dostarlimab are currently approved as second-line treatment options. Moreover, either dostarlimab or pembrolizumab can be added to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for mismatch repair deficient malignancies. Although the inclusion of these agents in clinical practice has led to improved overall response rates and survival outcomes, many patients still lack benefits, possibly due to multiple intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms to immunotherapy. This review aims to highlight the rationale for utilizing ICIs and their current role, while also delineating the proposed mechanisms of resistance to ICIs in cervical and endometrial cancer.

Real-life efficacy and safety of cemiplimab in advanced cervical cancer from a nominal use program in Italy: The MITO 44 study

BACKGROUND

cemiplimab is an immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeting the programmed cell death-1 receptor. A nominal use program is available in Italy in advanced cervical cancer (CC) patients treated with platinum based chemotherapy based on the results of EMPOWER-Cervical 1/GOG-3016/ENGOTcx9 trial. This real-world, retrospective cohort, multicenter study aimed at describing clinical outcomes of patients with advanced CC treated with cemiplimab in Italy.

METHODS

The primary objective of the study was to assess the feasibility and the replicability of the initial results in a real world setting of cemiplimab nominal use. The primary endpoint of our analysis was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety data.

RESULTS

From March 2022 to December 2023, 135 patients were treated in 12 Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO) Centers. Forty-two percent of patients had one or more comorbidities, hypertension being the most common (23.4%). Median PFS was 4.0 months (range 3.0-6.0) and median OS was 12.0 months (12.0- NR) with no differences according to PD-L1 status. Complete response (CR) or no evidence of disease (NED) were observed in 8.6%; partial response (PR) in 21.1%, stable disease (SD) in 14.8% and progression was recorded in 44.5% of patients. Most common drug related adverse events (AEs) were anemia (39.1%) and fatigue (27.8%). Immune related AEs occurred in 18.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the feasibility and the replicability of the cemiplimab nominal use in advanced CC, in a real-world practice in Italy.

Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab has shown efficacy in persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. The effect of chemoradiotherapy might be enhanced by immunotherapy. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of adding pembrolizumab to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 clinical trial, adults (age ≥18 years) at 176 medical centres in 30 countries with newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice-response system with integrated web response to receive 5 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks plus chemoradiotherapy, followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab (400 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by planned external beam radiotherapy type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy or non-volumetric-modulated arc therapy), cervical cancer stage at screening (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2014 stage IB2-IIB node positive vs stage III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) dose (<70 Gy vs ≥70 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1-by investigator or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease progression-and overall survival. Primary analysis was conducted in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly allocated participants. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population, which included all randomly allocated patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04221945, and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Between June 9, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 1060 participants were randomly assigned to treatment, with 529 assigned to the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 531 to the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. At data cutoff (Jan 9, 2023), median follow-up was 17·9 months (IQR 11·3-22·3) in both treatment groups. Median progression-free survival was not reached in either group; rates at 24 months were 68% in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group versus 57% in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. The hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death was 0·70 (95% CI 0·55-0·89, p=0·0020), meeting the protocol-specified primary objective. Overall survival at 24 months was 87% in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 81% in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group (information fraction 42·9%). The HR for death was 0·73 (0·49-1·07); these data have not crossed the boundary of statistical significance. Grade 3 or higher adverse event rates were 75% in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 69% in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group.

INTERPRETATION

Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co (MSD).

Occurrence and Management of Immunotherapy-Associated Adverse Events in Patients with Gynecological Cancers

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an essential therapeutic approach in treating many solid tumors. ICIs enhance the body's anti-tumor T-cell activity, resulting in a novel spectrum of immunotherapy-related side effects. This novel spectrum of adverse events differs significantly from the side effects of conventional chemotherapy. It, therefore, requires special attention in the diagnosis and management of immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs). The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze the incidence, diagnosis, and management of irAEs in patients with gynecologic malignancies who received ICIs and to discuss these findings in the context of the recent literature.

METHODS

In the present retrospective overview, we evaluated patients with gynecologic malignancies (breast, endometrial, cervical, ovarian) who received ICIs with regard to the incidence, type, and time to onset of irAEs. A total of 61 patients treated at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany, between 2018 and 2023 were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 32.8% of patients developed an irAE of any grade or type. The median time to irAE was 24 weeks. The most frequently observed irAEs were grade 1 (20%) or 2 (35%). Immunotherapy-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 45% of patients (40% grade 3, 5% grade 4). The most common type of irAE in our cohort was hypothyroidism, followed by hepatitis and colitis. Cox regression analysis identified the duration of ICI therapy as the only significant factor influencing the incidence of irAEs (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The broad spectrum of irAEs and the onset time of irAEs are important challenges of therapy with ICIs, requiring proactive monitoring and tailored management strategies to optimize the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy.

Evolving standards and future directions for systemic therapies in cervical cancer

Several groundbreaking clinical trials with the potential to transform the management paradigm of both locally advanced and persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancers have been presented in 2023. This review describes the reported data from INTERLACE and KEYNOTE-A18 in the locally advanced setting, as well as BEATcc, innovaTV 301 and DESTINY-PanTumor02 for advanced disease. The practice implications of their positive results are interpreted in the context of global health considerations, and updated treatment algorithms are proposed. Furthermore, emerging trends in drug development for cervical cancer are discussed. As the routine use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for curative and palliative indications increases in the foreseeable future, patients whose cervical cancers which persist, relapse or progress after prior ICI exposure will represent an area of unmet clinical need and form the key target population for next-generation trials. Future research will help shape oncologists' approaches in the optimal selection, sequencing and re-treatment or rechallenge of immuno-oncology agents and/or antibody-drug conjugates in women with cervical cancer.

Pharmacotherapy for the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer: an update of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. High-risk locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic cervical cancers have a poor prognosis with routine treatments. The objective of this study is to analyze the data available in the literature on therapies and molecules currently in use to improve the prognosis of recurrent cervical cancer.

AREAS COVERED

An extensive literature search was conducted by authors to identify relevant trials on various databases. Articles in English published until September 2023 that investigate different pharmacotherapy strategies for the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer, were included. Results of various pharmacological regimens including different combinations of chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, DNA damage repair inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates were analyzed.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, there have been significant improvements in the outcomes of recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. However, these improvements do not address the unmet need in terms of oncological outcomes. The introduction of immunotherapy and targeted therapies showed advantages in cervical cancer patients. New therapies and combination strategies must be implemented. Centralization of care and enrollment in clinical trials are of paramount importance. Primary and secondary prevention remains the fundamental goal to reduce the burden of cervical cancer.