1
|
Katdare AN, Baheti AD, Pangarkar SY, Mistry KA, Ankathi SK, Haria PD, Choudhari AJ, Guha A, Gala K, Shetty N, Kulkarni S, Ramadwar M, Bal M. Evaluation of an Objective MRI-Based Tumor Regression Grade (mrTRG) Score and a Subjective Likert Score for Assessing Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers-A Retrospective Study. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2024; 34:69-75. [PMID: 38106857 PMCID: PMC10723953 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the help of MRI-based tumor regression grade (mrTRG) score has been used as a tool to predict pathological tumor regression grade (pTRG) in patients of rectal cancer post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Our study aims to evaluate the ability of MRI in assessing treatment response comparing an objective mrTRG score and a subjective Likert score, with a focus on the ability to predict pathologic complete response (pCR). Methods: Post-treatment MRI studies were retrospectively reviewed for 170 consecutive cases of histopathologically proven rectal cancer after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation and prior to surgery by two oncoradiologists blinded to the eventual postoperative histopathology findings. An objective (mrTRG) and a subjective Likert score were assigned to all the cases. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the ability of Likert scale and mrTRG to predict pCR, with postoperative histopathology being the gold standard. The optimal cutoff points on the scale of 1 to 5 were obtained for mrTRG and Likert scale with the greatest sum of sensitivity and specificity using the Youden Index. Results: The most accurate cutoff point for the mrTRG to predict complete response was 2.5 (using Youden index), with a sensitivity of 69.2%, specificity of 69.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.6%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 46.4%, and accuracy of 69.3%. The most accurate cutoff for the Likert scale to predict complete response was 3.5, with a sensitivity of 47.5%, specificity of 89.1%, PPV of 91.9%, NPV of 39.4%, and accuracy of 59%. mrTRG had a lower cutoff and was more accurate in predicting pCR compared to Likert score. Conclusion: An objective mrTRG was more accurate than a subjective Likert scale to predict complete response in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparna N Katdare
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Akshay D Baheti
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sayali Y Pangarkar
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kunal A Mistry
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suman K Ankathi
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Purvi D Haria
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit J Choudhari
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amrita Guha
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kunal Gala
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nitin Shetty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suyash Kulkarni
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mukta Ramadwar
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Munita Bal
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hall WA, Li J, You YN, Gollub MJ, Grajo JR, Rosen M, dePrisco G, Yothers G, Dorth JA, Rahma OE, Russell MM, Gross HM, Jacobs SA, Faller BA, George S, Al baghdadi T, Haddock MG, Valicenti R, Hong TS, George TJ. Prospective Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Tumor Regression Grade With Pathologic Outcomes in Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4643-4651. [PMID: 37478389 PMCID: PMC10564288 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a newly established standard treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma. Current methods to communicate magnitudes of regression during TNT are subjective and imprecise. Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (MR-TRG) is an existing, but rarely used, regression grading system. Prospective validation of MR-TRG correlation with pathologic response in patients undergoing TNT is lacking. Utility of adding diffusion-weighted imaging to MR-TRG is also unknown. METHODS We conducted a multi-institutional prospective imaging substudy within NRG-GI002 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02921256) examining the ability of MR-based imaging to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) and correlate MR-TRG with the pathologic neoadjuvant response score (NAR). Serial MRIs were needed from 110 patients. Three radiologists independently, then collectively, reviewed each MRI for complete response (mriCR), which was tested for positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity with pCR. MR-TRG was examined for association with the pathologic NAR score. All team members were blinded to pathologic data. RESULTS A total of 121 patients from 71 institutions met criteria: 28% were female (n = 34), 84% White (n = 101), and median age was 55 (24-78 years). Kappa scores for T- and N-stage after TNT were 0.38 and 0.88, reflecting fair agreement and near-perfect agreement, respectively. Calling an mriCR resulted in a kappa score of 0.82 after chemotherapy and 0.56 after TNT reflected near-perfect agreement and moderate agreement, respectively. MR-TRG scores were associated with pCR (P < .01) and NAR (P < .0001), PPV for pCR was 40% (95% CI, 26 to 53), and NPV was 84% (95% CI, 75 to 94). CONCLUSION MRI alone is a poor tool to distinguish pCR in rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing TNT. However, the MR-TRG score presents a now validated method, correlated with pathologic NAR, which can objectively measure regression magnitude during TNT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A. Hall
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Jiahe Li
- The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Y. Nancy You
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Joseph R. Grajo
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL
| | - Mark Rosen
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Group, and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Greg dePrisco
- Baylor Scott and White Health Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Jennifer A. Dorth
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Marcia M. Russell
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, and VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Bryan A. Faller
- Missouri Baptist Medical Center/Heartland NCORP, St Louis, MO
| | - Sagila George
- Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Tareq Al baghdadi
- Trinity Health Ann Arbor Hospital, Michigan Cancer Research Consortium (NCORP), Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Richard Valicenti
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center/UC Davis School of Med/UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA
| | - Theodore S. Hong
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas J. George
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peng W, Wan L, Wang S, Zou S, Zhao X, Zhang H. A multiple-time-scale comparative study for the added value of magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1234619. [PMID: 37664046 PMCID: PMC10468971 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1234619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Radiomics based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows potential for prediction of therapeutic effect to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); however, thorough comparison between radiomics and traditional models is deficient. We aimed to construct multiple-time-scale (pretreatment, posttreatment, and combined) radiomic models to predict pathological complete response (pCR) and compare their utility to those of traditional clinical models. Methods In this research, 165 LARC patients undergoing nCRT followed by surgery were enrolled retrospectively, which were divided into training and testing sets in the ratio of 7:3. Morphological features on pre- and posttreatment MRI, coupled with clinical data, were evaluated by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis for constructing clinical models. Radiomic parameters were derived from pre- and posttreatment T2- and diffusion-weighted images to develop the radiomic signatures. The clinical-radiomics models were then generated. All the models were developed in the training set and then tested in the testing set, the performance of which was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Radiomic models were compared with the clinical models with the DeLong test. Results One hundred and sixty-five patients (median age, 55 years; age interquartile range, 47-62 years; 116 males) were enrolled in the study. The pretreatment maximum tumor length, posttreatment maximum tumor length, and magnetic resonance tumor regression grade were selected as independent predictors for pCR in the clinical models. In the testing set, the pre- and posttreatment and combined clinical models generated AUCs of 0.625, 0.842, and 0.842 for predicting pCR, respectively. The MRI-based radiomic models performed reasonably well in predicting pCR, but neither the pure radiomic signatures (AUCs, 0.734, 0.817, and 0.801 for the pre- and posttreatment and combined radiomic signatures, respectively) nor the clinical-radiomics models (AUCs, 0.734, 0.860, and 0.801 for the pre- and posttreatment and combined clinical-radiomics models, respectively) showed significant added value compared with the clinical models (all P > 0.05). Conclusion The MRI-based radiomic models exhibited no definite added value compared with the clinical models for predicting pCR in LARC. Radiomic models can serve as ancillary tools for tailoring adequate treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjing Peng
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lijuan Wan
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Sicong Wang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Diagnosis, GE Healthcare, Life Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shuangmei Zou
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xinming Zhao
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nougaret S, Rousset P, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Gormly K, Lucidarme O, Brunelle S, Milot L, Arrivé L, Salut C, Pilleul F, Hordonneau C, Baudin G, Soyer P, Brun V, Laurent V, Savoye-Collet C, Petkovska I, Gerard JP, Cotte E, Rouanet P, Catalano O, Denost Q, Tan RB, Frulio N, Hoeffel C. MRI restaging of rectal cancer: The RAC (Response-Anal canal-CRM) analysis joint consensus guidelines of the GRERCAR and GRECCAR groups. Diagn Interv Imaging 2023; 104:311-322. [PMID: 36949002 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop guidelines by international experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer restaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Evidence-based data and experts' opinions were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts provided recommendations for reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if < 80% consensus among experts). RESULTS Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed. CONCLUSION These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer restaging with MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology IRCM, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, 34000 Montpellier, France; INSERM, U1194, University of Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier, France.
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, CHU Lyon-Sud, EMR 3738 CICLY, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69495 Pierre-Benite, France
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Gormly
- Jones Radiology, Kurralta Park, 5037, Australia; University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Oliver Lucidarme
- Department of Radiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France; LIB, INSERM, CNRS, UMR7371-U1146, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Serge Brunelle
- Department of Radiology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Milot
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Lionel Arrivé
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, 75012 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Celine Salut
- CHU de Bordeaux, Department of Radiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Franck Pilleul
- Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1206, 69621, Lyon, France
| | | | - Guillaume Baudin
- Department of Radiology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06100 Nice, France
| | - Philippe Soyer
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Vanessa Brun
- Department of Radiology, CHU Hôpital Pontchaillou, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Valérie Laurent
- Department of Radiology, Nancy University Hospital, Université de Lorraine, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jean-Pierre Gerard
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Eddy Cotte
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, 69310 Pierre Bénite, France; Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Philippe Rouanet
- Department of Surgery, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - Onofrio Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Quentin Denost
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, Université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Regina Beets Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nora Frulio
- CHU de Bordeaux, Department of Radiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Christine Hoeffel
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Robert Debré & CRESTIC, URCA, 51092 Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Comparison of tumor regression grade and clinical stage based on MRI image as a selection criterion for non-radical management after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1561-1568. [PMID: 35648208 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04193-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There has been no comparative study on the clinical value of magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG)1-2 and ycT0-1N0 for the prediction of ypT0-1N0 after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for rectal cancer. We compared the diagnostic performance between mrTRG1-2 and ycT0-1N0 for predicting ypT0-1N0 as a selection criterion for non-radical management after CCRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 291 patients from three referral hospitals between January 2018 and March 2020. The diagnostic performance of ycT0-1N0 and mrTRG1-2 for the prediction of ypT0-1N0 was compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS Sixty-eight patients (23.4%) achieved ypT0-1N0. Nineteen patients (6.5%) had ycT0-1N0, and 91 patients (31.2%) had mrTRG1-2. For predicting ypT0-1N0, ycT0-1N0 had a sensitivity of 16.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.36‒27.10) and positive-predictive value of 57.9% (95% CI: 36.57‒76.63), while mrTRG1-2 had a sensitivity of 58.8% (95% CI: 46.23‒70.63) and positive-predictive value of 44.0% (95% CI: 36.46‒51.74). When predicting ypT0-1N0, mrTRG1-2 showed a higher AUC (0.680, 95% CI: 0.604‒0.756) than ycT0-1N0 (0.563, 95% CI: 0.481‒0.645) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION mrTRG1-2 might be a better indicator than ycT0-1N0 for the selection of non-radical management of advanced rectal cancer post-CCRT. However, additional diagnostic tools are required for predicting ypT0-1N0 because mrTRG1-2 or yc stage on MRI has insufficient evidence for diagnosing ypT0-1N0.
Collapse
|
6
|
Munk NE, Bondeven P, Pedersen BG. Diagnostic performance of MRI and endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Radiol 2021; 64:20-31. [PMID: 34928715 DOI: 10.1177/02841851211065925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities and/or endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is unclear. PURPOSE To summarize existing evidence on the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, T2-weighted MR tumor regression grade, and/or endoscopy for assessing complete tumor response after nCRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive, and positive predictive values were retrieved from included studies. RESULTS In total, 81 studies were eligible for inclusion. Evidence suggests that combined use of MRI and endoscopy tends to improve the diagnostic performance compared to single imaging modality. The positive predictive value of a complete response varies substantially between studies. There is considerable heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSION Combined re-staging tends to improve diagnostic performance compared to single imaging modality, but the vast majority of studies fail to offer true clinical value due to the study heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Bondeven
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Randers, Randers, Denmark
| | - Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wan L, Peng W, Zou S, Ye F, Geng Y, Ouyang H, Zhao X, Zhang H. MRI-based delta-radiomics are predictive of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Acad Radiol 2021; 28 Suppl 1:S95-S104. [PMID: 33189550 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To investigate the capability of delta-radiomics to predict pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 165 consecutive patients with LARC (training set, n = 116; test set, n = 49) who received nCRT before surgery. All patients underwent pre- and post-nCRT MRI examination from which radiomics features were extracted. A delta-radiomics feature was defined as the percentage change in a radiomics feature from pre- to post-nCRT MRI. A data reduction and feature selection process including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was performed for building T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) delta-radiomics signature. Logistic regression was used to build a T2WI and DWI combined radiomics model. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess diagnostic performance. Delong method was used to compare the performance of delta-radiomics model with that of magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG). RESULTS Twenty-seven of 165 patients (16.4%) achieved pCR. T2WI and DWI delta-radiomics signature, and the combined model showed good predictive performance for pCR. The combined model achieved the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.98) and 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-0.99) in the training and test sets, respectively (significantly greater than those for mrTRG; training set, p < 0.001; test set, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION MRI-based delta-radiomics can help predict pCR after nCRT in patients with LARC with better performance than mrTRG.
Collapse
|
8
|
Santiago I, Rodrigues B, Barata M, Figueiredo N, Fernandez L, Galzerano A, Parés O, Matos C. Re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients with MR imaging when "Watch-and-Wait" is an option: a practical guide. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:114. [PMID: 34373961 PMCID: PMC8353037 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01055-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past nearly 20 years, organ-sparing when no apparent viable tumour is present after neoadjuvant therapy has taken an increasingly relevant role in the therapeutic management of locally-advanced rectal cancer patients. The decision to include a patient or not in a “Watch-and-Wait” program relies mainly on endoscopic assessment by skilled surgeons, and MR imaging by experienced radiologists. Strict surveillance using the same modalities is required, given the chance of a local regrowth is of approximately 25–30%, almost always surgically salvageable if caught early. Local regrowths occur at the endoluminal aspect of the primary tumour bed in almost 90% of patients, but the rest are deep within it or outside the rectal wall, in which case detection relies solely on MR Imaging. In this educational review, we provide a practical guide for radiologists who are, or intend to be, involved in the re-staging and follow-up of rectal cancer patients in institutions with an established “Watch-and-Wait” program. First, we discuss patient preparation and MR imaging acquisition technique. Second, we focus on the re-staging MR imaging examination and review the imaging findings that allow us to assess response. Third, we focus on follow-up assessments of patients who defer surgery and confer about the early signs that may indicate a sustained/non-sustained complete response, a rectal/extra-rectal regrowth, and the particular prognosis of the “near-complete” responders. Finally, we discuss our proposed report template.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Santiago
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal. .,Nova Medical School, Campo Mártires da Pátria 130, 1169-056, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Bernardete Rodrigues
- Centro Hospitalar de Tondela-Viseu, EPE, Av. Rei Duarte, 3504-509, Viseu, Portugal
| | - Maria Barata
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nuno Figueiredo
- Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Laura Fernandez
- Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Antonio Galzerano
- Pathology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Oriol Parés
- Radiation Oncology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Celso Matos
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
MR tumor regression grade for pathological complete response in rectal cancer post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis for accuracy. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:2312-2323. [PMID: 31953656 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06565-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG) for pathological complete response (pCR) and its correlation with pathological findings. METHODS Original studies that investigated the correlation of mrTRG with pathological tumor regression grade and pathological T stage were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE up until August 31, 2018, according to PRISMA guidelines. The search terms included colorectal cancer, chemoradiation therapy, magnetic resonance imaging, and response or regression. Meta-analytic summary sensitivity and specificity for pathologic complete response (pCR) and pathologic T1 or lower than T1 stage (≤ypT1) were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated in both mrTRG 1 and mrTRG 1 or 2, respectively. RESULTS Six studies with 916 patients were included. The meta-analytic summary sensitivity and specificity of mrTRG 1 for pCR were 32.3% (95% CI, 18.2-50.6%) and 93.5% (95% CI, 91.5-95.1%), while for ≤ypT1 they were 31.8% (95% CI, 16.2-53.0%) and 94.7% (95% CI, 91.9-96.5%). On the contrary, sensitivity and specificity of mrTRG 1 or 2 for pCR were 69.9% (95% CI, 60.2-78.1%) and 62.2% (95% CI, 56.2-67.8%), while those for ≤ypT1 were 71.4% (95% CI, 61.6-79.6%) and 67.7% (95% CI, 59.8-74.7%). CONCLUSIONS mrTRG 1 showed high specificity for pCR and ≤ypT1, but suboptimal sensitivity. mrTRG 1 or 2 showed higher sensitivity for pCR and ≤ypT1, but lower specificity. Because of the suboptimal sensitivity of mrTRG 1, it might be limited as a criterion for less aggressive treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. KEY POINTS • Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade 1 shows high specificity for pCR and ≤ypT1, but suboptimal sensitivity. • Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade 1 or 2 shows higher sensitivity for pCR and ≤ypT1, but lower specificity than magnetic resonance tumor regression grade 1 alone.
Collapse
|
10
|
Nahas SC, Nahas CSR, Cama GM, de Azambuja RL, Horvat N, Marques CFS, Menezes MR, Junior UR, Cecconello I. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance to assess treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:3632-3640. [PMID: 30663025 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01894-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local restaging in patients with non-metastatic locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using surgical histopathology of total mesorectal excision as the reference standard. METHODS Ninety-five patients with LARC who underwent rectal MRI after CRT between January 2014 and December 2016 were included. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value for local staging regarding T-stage, N-stage, circumferential resection margin, and MRI tumor regression grade (ymriTRG) were calculated, and inter-test agreements were assessed. RESULTS 22/95 (23.2%) patients had radiological complete response (rCR), whereas 20/95 (21.1%) had pathological complete response (pCR). Among the patients with pCR, 11/20 (55%) had rCR. Fair agreement was demonstrated between ymriTRG and pathological TRG (ypTRG) (κ = 0.255). The sensitivity and specificity for detection of pCR were 61.1% (95% CI 35.7-82.7) and 89.6% (95% CI 80.6-95.4). For the detection of ypTRG grades 1 and 2, the corresponding values were 67.2% (95% CI 54.3-78.4) and 51.6 (95% CI 33.1-69.8). The accuracy of ymriTRG was 24.2% (95% CI 15.6-32.8). Inter-test agreement in TRG between MRI and pathology was overall fair (κ = 0.255) and slight (κ = 0.179), if TRG 1 + 2. CONCLUSION Qualitative assessment on MRI for diagnosing pCR showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity, whereas the diagnosis of TRG had moderate sensitivity and low specificity with slight to fair inter-test agreement when compared with pathological specimens.
Collapse
|
11
|
Developing a prediction model based on MRI for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:2978-2987. [PMID: 31327039 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02129-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to build an appropriate diagnostic model for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), by combining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters with clinical factors. METHODS Eighty-four patients with LARC who underwent MR examination before and after nCRT were enrolled in this study. MRI parameters including cylindrical approximated tumor volume (CATV) and relative signal intensity of tumor (rT2wSI) were measured; corresponding reduction rates (RR) were calculated; and MR tumor regression grade (mrTRG) and other conventional MRI parameters were assessed. Logistic regression with lasso regularization was performed and the appropriate prediction model for pCR was built up. An external cohort of thirty-six patients was used as the validation group for testing the model. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance. RESULTS In the development and the validation group, 17 patients (20.2%) and 11 patients (30.6%), respectively, achieved pCR. Two CATV-related parameters (CATVpost, which is the CATV measured after nCRT and CATVRR), one rT2wSI-related parameter (rT2wSIRR), and mrTRG were the most important parameters for predicting pCR and were retained in the diagnostic model. In the development group, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting pCR is 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.97, p < 0.001], with a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 83.6%. In the validation group, the AUC is 0.84 (95% CI 0.70-0.98, p = 0.001), with a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 76.0%. CONCLUSION A diagnostic model including CATVpost, CATVRR, rT2wSIRR, and mrTRG was useful for predicting pCR after nCRT in patients with LARC and may be used as an effective organ-preservation strategy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang C, Ye F, Liu Y, Ouyang H, Zhao X, Zhang H. Morphologic predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 9:4862-4874. [PMID: 29435147 PMCID: PMC5797018 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the value of morphological parameters that can be obtained conveniently by MRI for predicting pathologically complete response (pCR) in patients with rectal cancer. Materials and Methods A cohort of 101 patients was examined using MRI before and after Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Morphological parameters including maximum tumor area (MTA), maximum tumor length (MTL) and maximum tumor thickness (MTT), as well as cylindrical approximated tumor volume (CATV), distance to anal verge (DTA), and the reduction rates were evaluated by two experienced readers independently. Results Post-nCRT MTA and MTL, reduction rates and pre-nCRT DTA were proved to be significantly different between pCR and non-pCR with the AUCs of 0.672-0.853. The sensitivity and specificity for assessing pCR were 61.1-89.9% and 59.0-80.7% respectively. No significant correlation between pre-nCRT size measurements and pCR was obtained. Conclusion The convenient morphological measurements may be useful for predicting pCR with moderate sensitivity and specificity. Combining these predictors with the aim of building diagnostic model should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chongda Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 10021, China
| | - Feng Ye
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 10021, China
| | - Yuan Liu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 10021, China
| | - Han Ouyang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 10021, China
| | - Xinming Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 10021, China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 10021, China
| |
Collapse
|