1
|
Bhimani J, O'Connell K, Ergas IJ, Foley M, Gallagher GB, Griggs JJ, Heon N, Kolevska T, Kotsurovskyy Y, Kroenke CH, Laurent CA, Liu R, Nakata KG, Persaud S, Rivera DR, Roh JM, Tabatabai S, Valice E, Bowles EJA, Bandera EV, Kushi LH, Kantor ED. Trends in chemotherapy use for early-stage breast cancer from 2006 to 2019. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:101. [PMID: 38872192 PMCID: PMC11170793 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01822-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about how use of chemotherapy has evolved in breast cancer patients. We therefore describe chemotherapy patterns for women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer in the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) Study using data from KPNC (Kaiser Permanente Northern California) and KPWA (Kaiser Permanente Washington). FINDINGS Among 33,670 women, aged 18 + y, diagnosed with primary stage I-IIIA breast cancer at KPNC and KPWA from 2006 to 2019, we explored patterns of intravenous chemotherapy use, defined here as receipt of intravenous cytotoxic drugs and/or anti-HER2 therapies. We evaluated trends in chemotherapy receipt, duration over which chemotherapy was received, and number of associated infusion visits. In secondary analyses, we stratified by receipt of anti-HER2 therapies (trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab), given their longer duration. 38.9% received chemotherapy intravenously, declining from 40.2% in 2006 to 35.6% in 2019 (p-trend < 0.001). Among 13,089 women receiving chemotherapy, neoadjuvant treatment increased (4.1-14.7%; p-trend < 0.001), as did receipt of anti-HER2 therapies (20.8-30.9%) (p-trend < 0.001). The average treatment duration increased (5.3 to 6.0 months; p-trend < 0.001), as did the number of infusion visits (10.8 to 12.5; p-trend < 0.001). For those receiving anti-HER2 therapies, treatment duration and average number of visits decreased; among those not receiving anti-HER2 therapies, number of visits increased, with no change in duration. CONCLUSIONS While the prevalence of chemotherapy receipt has decreased over time, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has increased, as has use of anti-HER2 therapies; duration and number of administration visits have also increased. Understanding these trends is useful to inform clinical and administrative planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Bhimani
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kelli O'Connell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Isaac J Ergas
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Marilyn Foley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Grace B Gallagher
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Griggs
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Narre Heon
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tatjana Kolevska
- Department of Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Vallejo, CA, USA
| | - Yuriy Kotsurovskyy
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Candyce H Kroenke
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Cecile A Laurent
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Raymond Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
- San Francisco Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kanichi G Nakata
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sonia Persaud
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna R Rivera
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Janise M Roh
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Sara Tabatabai
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily Valice
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Erin J A Bowles
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Lawrence H Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Kantor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D'Avella C, Whooley P, Milano E, Egleston B, Helstrom J, Patrick K, Edelman M, Bauman J. The impact of an oncology urgent care center on health-care utilization. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae009. [PMID: 38377387 PMCID: PMC10946649 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studies suggest that many emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations for patients with cancer may be preventable. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has implemented changes to the hospital outpatient reporting program that targets acute care in-treatment patients for preventable conditions. Oncology urgent care centers aim to streamline patient care. Our cancer center developed an urgent care center called the direct referral unit in 2011. METHODS We abstracted visits to our adjacent hospital ED and direct referral unit from January 2014 to June 2018. Patient demographics, cancer and visit diagnoses, visit charges, and 30-day therapy utilization were assessed. RESULTS An analysis of 13 114 visits demonstrated that increased direct referral unit utilization was associated with decreased monthly ED visits (P < .001). Common direct referral unit visit diagnoses were dehydration, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, and fever. Patients receiving active cancer treatment more frequently presented to the direct referral unit (P < .001). The average charges were $2221 for the direct referral unit and $10 261 for the ED. CONCLUSION The association of decreased ED visits with increased direct referral unit utilization demonstrates the potential for urgent care centers to reduce acute care visits. Many patients presented to our direct referral unit with preventable conditions, and these visits were associated with considerable cost savings, supporting its use as a cost-effective method to reduce acute care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D'Avella
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter Whooley
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily Milano
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brian Egleston
- Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James Helstrom
- Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth Patrick
- Department of Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Martin Edelman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jessica Bauman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fleshner L, Lagree A, Shiner A, Alera MA, Bielecki M, Grant R, Kiss A, Krzyzanowska MK, Cheng I, Tran WT, Gandhi S. Drivers of Emergency Department Use Among Oncology Patients in the Era of Novel Cancer Therapeutics: A Systematic Review. Oncologist 2023; 28:1020-1033. [PMID: 37302801 PMCID: PMC10712716 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients diagnosed with cancer are frequent users of the emergency department (ED). While many visits are unavoidable, a significant portion may be potentially preventable ED visits (PPEDs). Cancer treatments have greatly advanced, whereby patients may present with unique toxicities from targeted therapies and are often living longer with advanced disease. Prior work focused on patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy, and often excluded those on supportive care alone. Other contributors to ED visits in oncology, such as patient-level variables, are less well-established. Finally, prior studies focused on ED diagnoses to describe trends and did not evaluate PPEDs. An updated systematic review was completed to focus on PPEDs, novel cancer therapies, and patient-level variables, including those on supportive care alone. METHODS Three online databases were used. Included publications were in English, from 2012-2022, with sample sizes of ≥50, and reported predictors of ED presentation or ED diagnoses in oncology. RESULTS 45 studies were included. Six studies highlighted PPEDs with variable definitions. Common reasons for ED visits included pain (66%) or chemotherapy toxicities (69.1%). PPEDs were most frequent amongst breast cancer patients (13.4%) or patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy (20%). Three manuscripts included immunotherapy agents, and only one focused on end-of-life patients. CONCLUSION This updated systematic review highlights variability in oncology ED visits during the last decade. There is limited work on the concept of PPEDs, patient-level variables and patients on supportive care alone. Overall, pain and chemotherapy toxicities remain key drivers of ED visits in cancer patients. Further work is needed in this realm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Fleshner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Lagree
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Temerty Centre for AI Research and Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Audrey Shiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marie Angeli Alera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mateusz Bielecki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert Grant
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alex Kiss
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The Cancer Quality Lab, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ivy Cheng
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Temerty Centre for AI Research and Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sonal Gandhi
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Numico G, Ferrua R, Fea E, Giamello J, Colantonio I, Occelli M, Vandone AM, Vanella P, Aimar G, Pisano C, Parlagreco E, Persano I, Milanesio M, Ippoliti R. Patients with cancer and hospital admissions: disease trajectory and strategic choices. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004574. [PMID: 37704262 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hospital admission (HA) in cancer history is a common, repeated and frequently unplanned event. The emergency departments (EDs) and the oncological outpatient service (OOS) are the ordinary way of entry. We studied the reasons of admission, pathways of access and discharge and prognostic factors in a population of admitted patients with cancer. METHODS The health records of the admitted patients in the oncological ward of a referral hospital in a 6-month period were retrieved and analysed. The characteristics of those admitted in the last 3 months of life were compared with the other group. RESULTS Among the 147 HA, 79.5% were unplanned, 48.9% passing through the ED and 30.6% through the OOS; 56.5% were due to cancer-related symptoms; 50.3% occurred in the last 3 months of life. Median overall survival was 90 days (95% IC 53.1-126.9). Independent prognostic factors for survival were: being admitted for symptoms, referral through the ED and not being discharged at home. CONCLUSIONS Hospital is a turning point in the cancer care pathway. Patients needing HA have a dismal prognosis, half of them being in the last 3 months of life. This group can be identified using universally available variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elena Fea
- Medical Oncology, AO S.Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Roberto Ippoliti
- Department of Jurisprudence and Political Economic and Social Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont Amedeo Avogadro, Alessandria, Piemonte, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lash RS, Hong AS, Bell JF, Reed SC, Pettit N. Recognizing the emergency department’s role in oncologic care: a review of the literature on unplanned acute care. EMERGENCY CANCER CARE 2022; 1:6. [PMID: 35844666 PMCID: PMC9200439 DOI: 10.1186/s44201-022-00007-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The global prevalence of cancer is rapidly increasing and will increase the acute care needs of patients with cancer, including emergency department (ED) care. Patients with cancer present to the ED across the cancer care continuum from diagnosis through treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life. This article describes the characteristics and determinants of ED visits, as well as challenges in the effort to define preventable ED visits in this population.
Findings
The most recent population-based estimates suggest 4% of all ED visits are cancer-related and roughly two thirds of these ED visits result in hospitalization—a 4-fold higher ED hospitalization rate than the general population. Approximately 44% of cancer patients visit the ED within 1 year of diagnosis, and more often have repeat ED visits within a short time frame, though there is substantial variability across cancer types. Similar patterns of cancer-related ED use are observed internationally across a range of different national payment and health system settings. ED use for patients with cancer likely reflects a complex interaction of individual and contextual factors—including provider behavior, health system characteristics, and health policies—that warrants greater attention in the literature.
Conclusions
Given the amount and complexity of cancer care delivered in the emergency setting, future research is recommended to examine specific symptoms associated with cancer-related ED visits, the contextual determinants of ED use, and definitions of preventable ED use specific to patients with cancer.
Collapse
|
6
|
Dufton PH, Gerdtz MF, Jarden R, Krishnasamy M. Methodological approaches to measuring the incidence of unplanned emergency department presentations by cancer patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:75. [PMID: 35313807 PMCID: PMC8935762 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01555-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The need to mitigate the volume of unplanned emergency department (ED) presentations is a priority for health systems globally. Current evidence on the incidence and risk factors associated with unplanned ED presentations is unclear because of substantial heterogeneity in methods reporting on this issue. The aim of this review was to examine the methodological approaches to measure the incidence of unplanned ED presentations by patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy in order to determine the strength of evidence and to inform future research. Methods An electronic search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane was undertaken. Papers published in English language between 2000 and 2019, and papers that included patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy as the denominator during the study period were included. Studies were eligible if they were analytical observational studies. Data relating to the methods used to measure the incidence of ED presentations by patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy were extracted and assessed for methodological rigor. Findings are reported in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guideline. Results Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria: 20 cohort studies, and one cross-sectional study. Overall risk of bias was moderate. There was substantial methodological and clinical heterogeneity in the papers included. Methodological rigor varied based on the description of methods such as the period of observation, loss to follow-up, reason for ED presentation and statistical methods to control for time varying events and potential confounders. Conclusions There is considerable diversity in the population and methods used in studies that measure the incidence of unplanned ED presentations by patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy. Recommendations to support the development of robust evidence include enrolling participants at diagnosis or initiation of treatment, providing adequate description of regular care to support patients who experience toxicities, reporting reasons for and characteristics of participants who are lost to follow-up throughout the study period, clearly defining the outcome including the observation and follow-up period, and reporting crude numbers of ED presentations and the number of at-risk days to account for variation in the length of treatment protocols. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01555-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P H Dufton
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
| | - M F Gerdtz
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - R Jarden
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - M Krishnasamy
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Krzyzanowska MK, Julian JA, Gu CS, Powis M, Li Q, Enright K, Howell D, Earle CC, Gandhi S, Rask S, Brezden-Masley C, Dent S, Hajra L, Freeman O, Spadafora S, Hamm C, Califaretti N, Trudeau M, Levine MN, Amir E, Bordeleau L, Chiarotto JA, Elser C, Husain J, Laferriere N, Rahim Y, Robinson AG, Vandenberg T, Grunfeld E. Remote, proactive, telephone based management of toxicity in outpatients during adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer: pragmatic, cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2021; 375:e066588. [PMID: 34880055 PMCID: PMC8652580 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of remote proactive management of toxicities during chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer. DESIGN Pragmatic, cluster randomised trial. SETTING 20 cancer centres in Ontario, Canada, allocated by covariate constrained randomisation to remote management of toxicities or routine care. PARTICIPANTS All patients starting adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer at each centre. 25 patients from each centre completed patient reported outcome questionnaires. INTERVENTIONS Proactive, standardised, nurse led telephone management of common toxicities at two time points after each chemotherapy cycle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome, cluster level mean number of visits to the emergency department or admissions to hospital per patient during the whole course of chemotherapy treatment, was evaluated with routinely available administrative healthcare data. Secondary patient reported outcomes included toxicity, self-efficacy, and quality of life. RESULTS Baseline characteristics of participants were similar in the intervention (n=944) and control arms (n=1214); 22% were older than 65 years. Penetration (that is, the percentage of patients who received the intervention at each centre) was 50-86%. Mean number of visits to the emergency department or admissions to hospital per patient was 0.91 (standard deviation 0.28) in the intervention arm and 0.94 (0.40) in the control arm (P=0.94); 47% (1014 of 2158 patients) had at least one visit to the emergency department or a hospital admission during chemotherapy. Among 580 participants who completed the patient reported outcome questionnaires, at least one grade 3 toxicity was reported by 48% (134 of 278 patients) in the intervention arm and by 58% (163 of 283) in the control arm. No differences in self-efficacy, anxiety, or depression were found. Compared with baseline, the functional assessment of cancer therapy trial outcome index decreased by 6.1 and 9.0 points in the intervention and control participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Proactive, telephone based management of toxicities during chemotherapy did not result in fewer visits to the emergency department or hospital admissions. With the rapid rise in remote care because of the covid-19 pandemic, identifying scalable strategies for remote management of patients during cancer treatment is particularly relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02485678.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jim A Julian
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Chu-Shu Gu
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Melanie Powis
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Qing Li
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Katherine Enright
- Trillium Health Partners, Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Doris Howell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Craig C Earle
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sonal Gandhi
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sara Rask
- Simcoe Muskoka Regional Cancer Program, Royal Victoria Hospital, Barrier, ON, Canada
| | | | - Susan Dent
- Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Leena Hajra
- Markham Stouffville Hospital, Markham, ON, Canada
| | - Orit Freeman
- Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Silvana Spadafora
- Algoma District Cancer Programme, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nadia Califaretti
- Grand River Hospital's Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, ON, Canada
| | - Maureen Trudeau
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark N Levine
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Eitan Amir
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Christine Elser
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Juhi Husain
- Brampton Civic Hospital, Brampton, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Laferriere
- Regional Cancer Centre Northwest, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Yasmin Rahim
- Stronach Regional Cancer Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Eva Grunfeld
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kawasumi K, Kujirai A, Matsui R, Kawano Y, Yamaguchi M, Aoyama T. Survey of serious adverse events and safety evaluation of oral anticancer drug treatment in Japan: A retrospective study. Mol Clin Oncol 2020; 14:12. [PMID: 33282287 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2020.2174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study assessed the safety of outpatient oral anticancer chemotherapeutic drugs by investigating the type and frequency of serious adverse effects (SAEs). Emergency hospitalization, unplanned consultations and telephone calls were investigated in 1,832 patients who received oral anticancer drug treatment at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between December 1, 2014 and November 30, 2015. Oral cytotoxic anticancer and molecular targeted drugs were administrated to 1,140 (62.2%) and 692 (37.8%) patients, respectively. A total of 52 (2.8%) SAEs were reported, with 32 (2.8%) occurring following cytotoxic anticancer drug administration and 20 (2.9%) occurring after molecular targeted drug treatment. The most common SAE was gastrointestinal toxicity. The median time to SAE occurrence was 32 days (range, 5-1,705 days). The rate of unplanned consultations and telephone calls were 5.5 and 37.9% among all patients, respectively, with skin reactions being the most common reason for unplanned consultations. SAEs often occurred early after treatment initiation. It was concluded that measures against gastrointestinal toxicity are particularly important were administering chemotherapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Kawasumi
- Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan.,Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba 278-8511, Japan
| | - Azusa Kujirai
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba 278-8511, Japan
| | - Reiko Matsui
- Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| | - Yohei Kawano
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba 278-8511, Japan
| | - Masakazu Yamaguchi
- Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takao Aoyama
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba 278-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mian BM, Siddiqui S, Ahmad AE. Management of urologic cancers during the pandemic and potential impact of treatment deferrals on outcomes. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:258-267. [PMID: 33129674 PMCID: PMC7598541 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic-related constraints on healthcare access have raised concerns about adverse outcomes from delayed treatment, including the risk of cancer progression and other complications. Further, concerns were raised about a potentially significant backlog of patients in need of cancer care due to the pandemic-related delays in healthcare, further exacerbating any potential adverse outcomes. Delayed access to surgery is particularly relevant to urologic oncology since one-third of new cancers in men (20% overall) arise from the genitourinary (GU) tract and surgery is often the primary treatment. Herein, we summarize the prepandemic literature on deferred surgery for GU cancers and risk of disease progression. The aforementioned data on delayed surgery were gathered in the context of systemic delays present in certain healthcare systems, or occasionally, due to planned deferral in suboptimal surgical candidates. These data provide indirect, but sufficient insight to develop triage schemas for prioritization of uro-oncological cases. Herein, we outline the extent to which the pandemic-related triage guidelines had influenced urologic practice in various regions. To study the adverse outcomes in the pandemic-era, a survey of urologic oncologists was conducted regarding modifications in their initial management of urologic cancers and any delay-related adverse outcomes. While the adverse effects directly from COVID-19 related delays will become apparent in the coming years, the results showing short-term outcomes are quite instructive. Since cancer care was assigned a higher priority at most centers, this strategy may have avoided significant delays in care and limited the anticipated negative impact of pandemic-related constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Badar M Mian
- Division of Urology, Albany Medical Center, Albany NY.
| | - Sana Siddiqui
- Division of Urology, Albany Medical Center, Albany NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grewal K, Krzyzanowska MK, McLeod S, Borgundvaag B, Atzema CL. Outcomes after emergency department use in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study. CMAJ Open 2020; 8:E496-E505. [PMID: 32792349 PMCID: PMC7850167 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer frequently require emergency medical care during treatment. The objective of this study was to characterize emergency department visits made by patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and to describe associated outcomes. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used population-based administrative data from Ontario, Canada. Patients aged 18 years and older, with a cancer diagnosis, and who received chemotherapy in the 30 days before being seen in an emergency department between 2013 and 2017 were included. Emergency department discharge diagnosis codes were categorized to identify the most frequent emergency department diagnoses. We examined the proportion of patients admitted to hospital and 30-day mortality. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of hospital admission. RESULTS We identified 218 459 emergency department visits made by 87 555 patients. The median number of emergency department visits per patient was 2 (interquartile range 1-3). Hematological, gastrointestinal, breast and lung cancer were the most common malignancies represented. The most common emergency department diagnoses were infection or fever (57 036 [26.1%]) and gastrointestinal diagnoses (26 456 [12.2%]). Of all visits, 77 978 (35.7%) resulted in admission to hospital. Thirty-day mortality after an emergency department visit was 9.8%. There was an increased odds of admission among patients who previously received palliative consultation, patients with bone or soft tissue or hematological malignancies, and patients with infection, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, weakness or genitourinary and nephrology diagnoses. INTERPRETATION Patients with cancer frequently used the emergency department during chemotherapy, and 1 in 4 emergency department visits were for infection or fever. These results highlight opportunities to optimize care for certain patients being actively treated for cancer, particularly around infectious complaints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keerat Grewal
- Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (Grewal, McLeod, Borgundvaag), Sinai Health System; ICES Central (Grewal, Krzyzanowska, Atzema); Divisions of Emergency Medicine (Grewal, Atzema) and Medical Oncology (Krzyzanowska), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology (Krzyzanowska), University Health Network; Department of Family & Community Medicine (McLeod, Borgundvaag), University of Toronto; Department of Emergency Services (Atzema), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (Grewal, McLeod, Borgundvaag), Sinai Health System; ICES Central (Grewal, Krzyzanowska, Atzema); Divisions of Emergency Medicine (Grewal, Atzema) and Medical Oncology (Krzyzanowska), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology (Krzyzanowska), University Health Network; Department of Family & Community Medicine (McLeod, Borgundvaag), University of Toronto; Department of Emergency Services (Atzema), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Shelley McLeod
- Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (Grewal, McLeod, Borgundvaag), Sinai Health System; ICES Central (Grewal, Krzyzanowska, Atzema); Divisions of Emergency Medicine (Grewal, Atzema) and Medical Oncology (Krzyzanowska), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology (Krzyzanowska), University Health Network; Department of Family & Community Medicine (McLeod, Borgundvaag), University of Toronto; Department of Emergency Services (Atzema), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Bjug Borgundvaag
- Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (Grewal, McLeod, Borgundvaag), Sinai Health System; ICES Central (Grewal, Krzyzanowska, Atzema); Divisions of Emergency Medicine (Grewal, Atzema) and Medical Oncology (Krzyzanowska), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology (Krzyzanowska), University Health Network; Department of Family & Community Medicine (McLeod, Borgundvaag), University of Toronto; Department of Emergency Services (Atzema), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| | - Clare L Atzema
- Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (Grewal, McLeod, Borgundvaag), Sinai Health System; ICES Central (Grewal, Krzyzanowska, Atzema); Divisions of Emergency Medicine (Grewal, Atzema) and Medical Oncology (Krzyzanowska), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology (Krzyzanowska), University Health Network; Department of Family & Community Medicine (McLeod, Borgundvaag), University of Toronto; Department of Emergency Services (Atzema), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jairam V, Lee V, Park HS, Thomas CR, Melnick ER, Gross CP, Presley CJ, Adelson KB, Yu JB. Treatment-Related Complications of Systemic Therapy and Radiotherapy. JAMA Oncol 2020; 5:1028-1035. [PMID: 30946433 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Importance Systemic therapy and radiotherapy can be associated with acute complications that may require emergent care. However, there are limited data characterizing complications and the financial burden of cancer therapy that are treated in emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. Objectives To estimate the incidence of treatment-related complications of systemic therapy or radiotherapy, examine factors associated with inpatient admission, and investigate the overall financial burden. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample was performed. Between January 2006 and December 2015, there was a weighted total of 1.3 billion ED visits; of these, 1.5 million were related to a complication of systemic therapy or radiotherapy for cancer. Data analysis was conducted from February 22 to December 23, 2018. External cause of injury codes, Clinical Classifications Software, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), Clinical Modification codes were used to identify patients with complications of systemic therapy or radiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Patterns in treatment-related complications, patient- and hospital-related factors associated with inpatient admission, and median and total charges for treatment-related complications were the main outcomes. Results Of the 1.5 million ED visits included in the analysis, 53.2% of patients were female and mean age was 63.3 years. Treatment-related ED visits increased by a rate of 10.8% per year compared with 2.0% for overall ED visits. Among ED visits, 90.9% resulted in inpatient admission to the hospital and 4.9% resulted in death during hospitalization. Neutropenia (136 167 [8.9%]), sepsis (128 171 [8.4%]), and anemia (117 557 [7.7%]) were both the most common and costliest (neutropenia: $5.52 billion; sepsis: $11.21 billion; and anemia: $6.78 billion) complications diagnosed on presentation to EDs; sepsis (odds ratio [OR], 21.00; 95% CI, 14.61-30.20), pneumonia (OR, 9.73; 95% CI, 8.08-11.73), and acute kidney injury (OR, 9.60; 95% CI, 7.77-11.85) were associated with inpatient admission. Costs related to the top 10 most common complications totaled $38 billion and comprised 48% of the total financial burden of the study cohort. Conclusions and Relevance Emergency department visits for complications of systemic therapy or radiotherapy increased at a 5.5-fold higher rate over 10 years compared with overall ED visits. Neutropenia, sepsis, and anemia appear to be the most common complications; sepsis, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury appear to be associated with the highest rates of inpatient admission. These complications suggest that significant charges are incurred on ED visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Jairam
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Victor Lee
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Henry S Park
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University-Knight Cancer Institute, Portland
| | - Edward R Melnick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Cary P Gross
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Carolyn J Presley
- The James Cancer Hospital & Solove Research Institute, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
| | - Kerin B Adelson
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Miret C, Domingo L, Louro J, Barata T, Baré M, Ferrer J, Carmona-García MC, Castells X, Sala M. Factors associated with readmissions in women participating in screening programs and treated for breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:940. [PMID: 31805926 PMCID: PMC6896282 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4789-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with early, late and long-term readmissions in women diagnosed with breast cancer participating in screening programs. Methods We performed a multicenter cohort study of 1055 women aged 50–69 years participating in Spanish screening programs, diagnosed with breast cancer between 2000 and 2009, and followed up to 2014. Readmission was defined as a hospital admission related to the disease and/or treatment complications, and was classified as early (< 30 days), late (30 days-1 year), or long-term readmission (> 1 year). We used logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to explore the factors associated with early, late and long-term readmissions, adjusting by women’s and tumor characteristics, detection mode, treatments received, and surgical and medical complications. Results Among the women included, early readmission occurred in 76 (7.2%), late readmission in 87 (8.2%), long-term readmission in 71 (6.7%), and no readmission in 821 (77.8%). Surgical complications were associated with an increased risk of early readmissions (aOR = 3.62; 95%CI: 1.27–10.29), and medical complications with late readmissions (aOR = 8.72; 95%CI: 2.83–26.86) and long-term readmissions (aOR = 4.79; 95%CI: 1.41–16.31). Conclusion Our results suggest that the presence of surgical or medical complications increases readmission risk, taking into account the detection mode and treatments received. Identifying early complications related to an increased risk of readmission could be useful to adapt the management of patients and reduce further readmissions. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT03165006. Registration date: May 22, 2017 (Retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carme Miret
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Training Unit PSMar-UPF-ASPB, Parc de Salut Mar, Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. .,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Teresa Barata
- General Directorate of Health Care Programs, Canary Islands Health Service, C/ Juan XXIII,13, 35005, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Marisa Baré
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain.,Cancer Screening and Clinical Epidemiology, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, 08208, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Department of Radiology, Hospital de Santa Caterina, C/ Dr. Castany, s/n, 17190 Salt, Girona, Spain
| | - Maria Carmen Carmona-García
- Epidemiology Unit and Girona Cancer Registry, Oncology Coordination Plan, Department of Health, Catalan Institute of Oncology, C/ Sol, 15, 17004, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), C/ Dr Castany s/n, 17190 Salt, Girona, Spain.,Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Av. França, S/N, 17007, Girona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Powis M, Groome P, Biswanger N, Kendell C, Decker KM, Grunfeld E, McBride ML, Urquhart R, Winget M, Porter GA, Krzyzanowska MK. Cross-Canada differences in early-stage breast cancer treatment and acute-care use. Curr Oncol 2019; 26:e624-e639. [PMID: 31708656 PMCID: PMC6821122 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.5003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chemotherapy has improved outcomes in early-stage breast cancer, but treatment practices vary, and use of acute care is common. We conducted a pan-Canadian study to describe treatment differences and the incidence of emergency department visits (edvs), edvs leading to hospitalization (edvhs), and direct hospitalizations (hs) during adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods The cohort consisted of women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (stages i-iii) during 2007-2012 in British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, or Nova Scotia who underwent curative surgery. Parallel provincial analyses were undertaken using linked clinical, registry, and administrative databases. The incidences of edvs, edvhs, and hs in the 6 months after treatment initiation were examined for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Results The cohort consisted of 50,224 patients. The proportion of patients who received chemotherapy varied by province, with Ontario having the highest proportion (46.4%), and Nova Scotia, the lowest proportion (38.0%). Age, stage, receptor status, comorbidities, and geographic location were associated with receipt of chemotherapy in all provinces. Ontario had the highest proportion of patients experiencing an edv (36.1%), but the lowest proportion experiencing h (6.4%). Conversely, British Columbia had the lowest proportion of patients experiencing an edv (16.0%), but the highest proportion experiencing h (26.7%). The proportion of patients having an edvh was similar across provinces (13.9%-16.8%). Geographic location was associated with edvs, edvhs, and hs in all provinces. Conclusions Intra- and inter-provincial differences in the use of chemotherapy and acute care were observed. Understanding variations in care can help to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement and shared learnings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Powis
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - P Groome
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | - N Biswanger
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry Department, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - C Kendell
- Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS
| | - K M Decker
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - E Grunfeld
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - M L McBride
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | | | - M Winget
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, U.S.A
| | - G A Porter
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth ii Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS
| | - M K Krzyzanowska
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tervonen HE, Chen TYT, Lin E, Boyle FM, Moylan EJ, Della-Fiorentina SA, Beith J, Johnston A, Currow DC. Risk of emergency hospitalisation and survival outcomes following adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer in New South Wales, Australia. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13125. [PMID: 31222826 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine risk of emergency hospital admission and survival following adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. METHODS Linked data from New South Wales population-based and clinical cancer registries (2008-2012), hospital admissions, official death records and pharmaceutical benefit claims. Women aged ≥18 years receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer in NSW public hospitals were included. Odds ratios (OR) for emergency hospitalisation within 6 months following chemotherapy initiation were estimated using logistic regression and survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS A total of 3,950 women were included and 30.6% were hospitalised. The most common principal diagnosis at admission was neutropenia (30.8%). Women receiving docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab (TCH) and docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) were the most frequently hospitalised. After adjustment for demographic and clinical factors, the increased risk of hospitalisation for TCH and TC remained compared with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide 3-weekly (OR 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.37 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.85 respectively). Five-year overall survival was similar for women who were (92.2%, 95% CI 90.7-93.8) and were not hospitalised (93.1%, 95% CI 92.1-94.1). CONCLUSION Emergency hospitalisations following chemotherapy for early breast cancer were relatively common, especially following docetaxel-containing protocols. Further examination of reasons for admission is needed to inform actions to improve patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tina Y T Chen
- Cancer Institute NSW, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Enmoore Lin
- Cancer Institute NSW, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frances M Boyle
- University of Sydney and Mater Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Jane Beith
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy Johnston
- Cancer Institute NSW, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David C Currow
- Cancer Institute NSW, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Van Ryckeghem F, Haverbeke C, Wynendaele W, Jerusalem G, Somers L, Van den Broeck A, Vingerhoedt S, Van Belle S. Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:1099-1108. [PMID: 30099601 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4399-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To prevent febrile neutropenia (FN), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (PPG) for patients at high risk (≥ 20%) of FN. In Belgium, the use of PPG is restricted by specific reimbursement criteria. The impact of these criteria on PPG use and adherence to guidelines is unknown. METHODS This multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study aimed to describe PPG use by FN risk category in breast cancer patients who were scheduled to receive myelosuppressive chemotherapy in outpatient clinics in Belgium during a 2-week period between 13 October and 12 December 2014. RESULTS In total, 490 patients were enrolled. Median age was 57.0 years. Based on their chemotherapy regimen, 53.9, 5.1 and 41.0% of patients were at a low, intermediate and high risk of FN, respectively. Overall, 39.8% of patients received PPG (17.0, 12.0 and 73.1% of those receiving low-, intermediate- and high-risk regimens, respectively). In the high-risk category, PPG was used in 89.9% of dose-dense and in 25.0% of classical chemotherapy regimens. PPG use was adherent to EORTC guidelines in 75.3% of patients (30.6% appropriate use, 44.7% appropriate non-use). EORTC guidelines would recommend PPG use in 46.1% of this study population (n = 226), and its use was reimbursable in Belgium in 76.1% of these patients (n = 172), but only 66.4% of them received PPG (n = 150). CONCLUSIONS Both Belgian reimbursement criteria and physician decision-making led to a proportion of patients for whom PPG treatment was recommended but finally not receiving it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chloë Haverbeke
- Gent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wim Wynendaele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Guy Jerusalem
- CHU Sart Tilman Liège and University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Simon Van Belle
- Gent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tang M, Horsley P, Lewis CR. Emergency department presentations in early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Intern Med J 2018; 48:583-587. [PMID: 29722200 DOI: 10.1111/imj.13785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
(Neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer is associated with side-effects, resulting in increased emergency department (ED) presentations. Treatment-related toxicity can affect quality of life, compromise chemotherapy delivery and treatment outcomes, and increase healthcare use. We performed a retrospective study of ED presentations in patients receiving curative chemotherapy for early breast cancer to identify factors contributing to ED presentations. Of 102 patients, 39 (38%) presented to ED within 30 days of chemotherapy, resulting in 63 ED presentations in total. Most common reasons were non-neutropenic fever (17 presentations/27%), neutropenic fever (15/24%), pain (9/14%), drug reaction (6/10%) and infection (4/6%). Factors significantly associated with ED presentation were adjuvant chemotherapy timing compared to neoadjuvant timing (P = 0.031), prophylactic antibiotics (P = 0.045) and docetaxel-containing regimen (P = 0.018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Tang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrick Horsley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Craig R Lewis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dioun S, Jorgensen JR, Miller EM, Tymon-Rosario J, Xie X, Xue X, Kuo DYS, Nevadunsky NS. Unplanned hospitalizations in a racially and ethnically diverse population of women receiving chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 151:134-140. [PMID: 30149897 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Unplanned hospital admission following chemotherapy is a measure of quality cancer care. Large retrospective datasets have shown admission rates of 10-35% for women with ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy. We sought to evaluate the prevalence and associated risk factors for hospital admission following chemotherapy in our racially diverse urban population. METHODS After IRB approval, clinicopathologic and treatment data were abstracted from all patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer who received chemotherapy at our institution from 2005 to 2016. Two-sided statistical analyses and Cox regression analysis were performed using Stata. RESULTS Of 217 evaluable patients, 87 (40%) had unplanned admissions following chemotherapy: adjuvant 64 (74%) and neoadjuvant 23(26%). Thirty (14%) had more than one admission. In total, there were 1314 days of hospitalization. The median readmission duration was 3 days. Body mass index and hypertension were predictive of readmission (p < 0.05). When comparing those readmitted more than once to those admitted once, both race and aspirin use were predictive of readmission (p < 0.05). Of those admitted more than once the self-identified race and ethnicity was 12 (40%) Hispanic, 8 (27%) White, 8 (27%) Black and 2 (7%) other. There was a significant difference in disease free (p = 0.01) and overall survival (p = 0.004) for patients with unplanned admission after chemotherapy as compared to those without admission. CONCLUSIONS Readmission rates in our racially diverse patient population were higher than previously reported in the literature. Identifying patients at risk of readmission may play a role in chemotherapy decision-making, and resource allocation including patient care navigators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Dioun
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, United States of America.
| | - Jennifer R Jorgensen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Eirwen M Miller
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Joan Tymon-Rosario
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Xianhong Xie
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Xiaonan Xue
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Dennis Yi-Shin Kuo
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, United States of America; Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Nicole S Nevadunsky
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, United States of America; Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Peyrilles E, Lepage-Seydoux C, Sejean K, Bonan B. [Implementation of a remote oncology-monitoring program for cancer patients in outpatient care unit: A major challenge for the different actors]. Bull Cancer 2018; 105:357-367. [PMID: 29499998 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Revised: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The development of outpatient departments requires health professionals to reorganize practices for a better patient monitoring and a better patient care pathway. OBJECTIVE To evaluate, using indicators, the impact of an oncology-monitoring program on activity and organizational fluidity in a Cytotoxic Preparation Unit and clinical departments. Method the clinical and biological data are collected between two injections by calling the patient two days prior chemotherapy is performed by a specialist nurse of an outsourced medical call center. After medical and pharmaceutical validation, early preparations (D-1) for expensive and non-expensive molecules are performed. RESULTS The program is started in February 2016. After 3 months, 382 patients were included into the program. Twenty-three patients on average are called per day related to 1162 completed clinical questionnaires (87%). Among the files, 47% are complete at D-2 (biological and clinical data). The early preparation rate of expensive drugs, zero before the program for financial reasons, has reached 40% at 3 months. The destroyed preparation rate because of non-administration decreased from 5 to 2%. DISCUSSION Preliminary results show a significant patient compliance, feasibility of early preparation of expensive and non-expensive chemotherapy. These are preliminary results of a one-year study. They will be completed by an evaluation of patients' and health professionals' satisfaction, evaluation of length of stay, optimization of operations for clinical departments and CPU. The D-2 biological data collection must be improved. A strong doctor/pharmacist collaboration is essential for better patient care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elodie Peyrilles
- Hôpital Foch, service pharmacie, 40, rue Worth, 92151 Suresnes, France.
| | | | - Karine Sejean
- Hôpital Foch, service pharmacie, 40, rue Worth, 92151 Suresnes, France
| | - Brigitte Bonan
- Hôpital Foch, service pharmacie, 40, rue Worth, 92151 Suresnes, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tatlow D. Jekyll and Hyde of chemotherapy treatment: Method for patient-specific dosing of chemotherapy medications. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2017; 45:312-316. [DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.12885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
20
|
Krzyzanowska MK, Enright K, Moineddin R, Yun L, Powis M, Ghannam M, Grunfeld E. Can Chemotherapy-Related Acute Care Visits Be Accurately Identified in Administrative Data? J Oncol Pract 2017; 14:e51-e58. [PMID: 29155611 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2017.023697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is increasing interest in using administrative data to examine treatment-related complications that lead to emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations (H). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of billing codes for identifying chemotherapy-related acute care visits (CRVs) among women with early-stage breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The cohort was identified by using deterministically linked health databases and consisted of women who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer who started adjuvant chemotherapy between 2007 and 2009 in Ontario, Canada. A random sample of 496 patient cases was chosen as the validation cohort. Sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) were calculated for three scenarios: chemotherapy-related ED visit, chemotherapy-related H, and febrile neutropenia (FN)-related visit. For FN-related visits, three definitions were considered: general, moderate, and strict. RESULTS The administrative cohort consisted of 8,359 patients, 43.4% of whom had at least one ED or H, including 1,496 women who had multiple visits that resulted in 6,293 unique visits. Of these, 73.1% were considered CRVs. The algorithm performed well in identifying CRVs that included H either from ED (SN, 90%; SP, 100%) or directly from home (SN, 91%; SP, 93%), but less well for ED visits that did not result in H (SN, 65%; SP, 80%). Depending on which FN algorithm was used, 4.8% to 24% of visits were considered related. The moderate FN algorithm provided the best tradeoff between SN (69% to 97%) and SP (83% to 98%). CONCLUSION Administrative data can be valuable in evaluating chemotherapy-related serious events. Algorithm validation in other cohorts is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; and Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Enright
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; and Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; and Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lingsong Yun
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; and Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Powis
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; and Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohammed Ghannam
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; and Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eva Grunfeld
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; and Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Impact of treatment regimen on acute care use during and after adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 164:515-525. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4280-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
22
|
A supportive care in cancer unit reduces costs and hospitalizations for transfusions in a comprehensive cancer center. TUMORI JOURNAL 2017; 103:449-456. [PMID: 28478645 DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Among patients with solid or hematologic malignancies undergoing oncologic therapies, blood product transfusions (BPT) are a relevant reason for planned/unplanned hospitalizations, as well as a possible cause of delay in administration of the oncologic therapies. Furthermore, they create additional costs for the healthcare system (HCS). The aim of this study was to compare the costs of performing BPT (erythrocytes and platelets) in medical units/wards to the costs derived from the administration of BPT in a dedicated outpatient supportive care in cancer unit (SCCU). METHODS Costs were analyzed from June 3, 2009 (when the SCCU started), until December 2013. Four inpatient oncologic units (bone marrow transplantation, radiotherapy, medical oncology I and II) were compared to the SCCU. Data regarding the transfusions performed by the SCCU of the patients who were previously hospitalized for transfusions were extracted, checked, and analyzed through a cross-check on the tax codes. Therefore, patients were considered suitable for the analysis if they had received BPT in the SCCU after a previous hospitalization for transfusion in one of the 4 units/wards. The average daily cost deriving from blood product units and from the hospitalization in each ward (irrespective of pharmaceutical expenses) was compared with the average daily cost deriving from blood product units and from the management of patients in the SCCU. RESULTS We analyzed 227 patients (112 female) with a mean age of 60 years (range 20-90) with hematologic malignancies in 79% of cases. The number of transfusions performed by the SCCU has grown constantly and consistently over the years, reaching 1,402 transfusions in 2013, thus exceeding the other considered units. The total savings for the HCS was €282.204.71, €151.182.85 in 2013 only. We saved €124.319,26 for each patient transfused at the SCCU. CONCLUSIONS A dedicated outpatient SCCU, aimed at monitoring and treating cancer therapy-related toxicities and comorbidities and in which it is also possible to perform BPT promptly and effectively, reduces the number of hospitalizations and provides an economical benefit for HCS.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kempf E, Prévost A, Rousseau B, Macquin-Mavier I, Louvet C, Tournigand C. [Are cancer outpatients ready for e-medicine?]. Bull Cancer 2016; 103:841-848. [PMID: 27497498 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION E-health offers new opportunities for improving cancer outpatients' monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the level and the use of electronic communication tools owned by cancer outpatients currently undergoing antitumoral treatment. METHODS This observational study consecutively recruited patients undergoing treatment at two day hospital oncology units from 1st to 31 October 2015. Each patient completed one standardised, anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS Overall, 386 questionnaires were analysed, of which 244 and 142 patients were from each hospital. Of these patients, 73% had access to the Internet either directly or through a third party. More than 90% of the patients owned a mobile phone, and half of them had a smartphone with Internet access. An increasing age and the socioeconomic class level were significantly associated with the use of the Internet and of a smartphone. Half of the patients had accessed websites dedicated to health topics and a quarter had used mobile applications on health topics. One-third of those patients found these electronic tools helpful. After adjustment, an increasing age was significantly associated with a decreased use of such tools. The majority (87%) of the patients enjoyed receiving text message reminders from their hospital about their consultation schedule. CONCLUSION Three in four cancer outpatients under treatment have access to the Internet and half use websites dedicated to health topics, with an impact of the age and the socioeconomic class level. Developing e-communication tools between caregivers and patients might be considered to improve their home monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Kempf
- AP-HP, hôpital universitaire Henri-Mondor, unité de pharmacologie clinique, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; AP-HP, hôpital universitaire Henri-Mondor, département d'oncologie médicale, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | | | - Benoit Rousseau
- AP-HP, hôpital universitaire Henri-Mondor, unité de pharmacologie clinique, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; AP-HP, hôpital universitaire Henri-Mondor, département d'oncologie médicale, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Isabelle Macquin-Mavier
- AP-HP, hôpital universitaire Henri-Mondor, unité de pharmacologie clinique, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Christophe Louvet
- Institut mutualiste Montsouris, département d'oncologie médicale, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- AP-HP, hôpital universitaire Henri-Mondor, département d'oncologie médicale, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|