1
|
Yadav S, Couch FJ, Domchek SM. Germline Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Current Concepts in Risk Evaluation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2024; 14:a041318. [PMID: 38151326 PMCID: PMC11293548 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has significantly improved over the past two decades. In addition to BRCA1/2, pathogenic variants in several other DNA-repair genes have been shown to increase the risks of breast and ovarian cancer. The magnitude of cancer risk is impacted not only by the gene involved, but also by family history of cancer, polygenic risk scores, and, in certain genes, pathogenic variant type or location. While estimates of breast and ovarian cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants are available, these are predominantly based on studies of high-risk populations with young age at diagnosis of cancer, multiple primary cancers, or family history of cancer. More recently, breast cancer risk for germline pathogenic variant carriers has been estimated from population-based studies. Here, we provide a review of the field of germline genetic testing and risk evaluation for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in high-risk and population-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhartha Yadav
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55901, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hernandez AR, Scheib R, Garber JE, Rana HQ, Bychkovsky BL. Genotype matters: Personalized screening recommendations for germline CHEK2 variants. Oncotarget 2024; 15:459-460. [PMID: 38985133 PMCID: PMC11235130 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Brittany L. Bychkovsky
- Correspondence to:Brittany L. Bychkovsky, Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA email
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cortina CS, Purdy A, Brazauskas R, Stachowiak SM, Fodrocy J, Klement KA, Sasor SE, Krucoff KB, Robertson K, Buth J, Lakatos AEB, Petroll AE, Doren EL. The Impact of a Breast Cancer Risk Assessment on the Decision for Gender-Affirming Chest Masculinization Surgery in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals: A Pilot Single-Arm Educational Intervention Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15701-2. [PMID: 38940898 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15701-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persons assigned female or intersex at birth and identify as transgender and/or gender-diverse (TGD) may undergo gender-affirming chest masculinization surgery (GACMS); however, GACMS is not considered equivalent to risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of elevated breast cancer (BC) risk in TGD persons, compare self-perceived versus calculated risk, and determine how risk impacts the decision for GACMS versus RRM. METHODS A prospective single-arm pilot educational intervention trial was conducted in individuals assigned female or intersex at birth, age ≥ 18 years, considering GACMS, without a BC history or a known pathogenic variant. BC risk was calculated using the Tyrer-Cuzik (all) and Gail models (age ≥ 35 years). Elevated risk was defined as ≥ 17%. RESULTS Twenty-five (N = 25) participants were enrolled with a median age of 24.0 years (interquartile range, IQR 20.0-30.0 years). All were assigned female sex at birth, most (84%) were Non-Hispanic (NH)-White, 48% identified as transgender and 40% as nonbinary, and 52% had a first- and/or second-degree family member with BC. Thirteen (52%) had elevated risk (prevalence 95% confidence interval (CI) 31.3-72.2%). Median self-perceived risk was 12% versus 17.5% calculated risk (p = 0.60). Of the 13 with elevated risk, 5 (38.5%) underwent/are scheduled to undergo GACMS, 3 (23%) of whom underwent/are undergoing RRM. CONCLUSIONS Over half of the cohort had elevated risk, and most of those who moved forward with surgery chose to undergo RRM. A BC risk assessment should be performed for TGD persons considering GACMS. Future work is needed to examine BC incidence and collect patient-reported outcomes. Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT06239766).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandler S Cortina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
- Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| | - Anna Purdy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Ruta Brazauskas
- Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Samantha M Stachowiak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jessica Fodrocy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kristen A Klement
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sarah E Sasor
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kate B Krucoff
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kevin Robertson
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jamie Buth
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Annie E B Lakatos
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Andrew E Petroll
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Erin L Doren
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laws A, Leonard S, Hershey E, Stokes S, Vincuilla J, Sharma E, Milliron K, Garber JE, Merajver SD, King TA, Pilewskie ML. Upgrade Rates and Breast Cancer Development Among Germline Pathogenic Variant Carriers with High-Risk Breast Lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3120-3127. [PMID: 38261128 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14947-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-risk lesions (HRL) of the breast are risk factors for future breast cancer development and may be associated with a concurrent underlying malignancy when identified on needle biopsy; however, there are few data evaluating HRLs in carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in breast cancer predisposition genes. METHODS We identified patients from two institutions with germline PVs in high- and moderate-penetrance breast cancer predisposition genes and an HRL in an intact breast, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), and lobular neoplasia (LN). We calculated upgrade rates at surgical excision and used Kaplan-Meier methods to characterize 3-year breast cancer risk in patients without upgrade. RESULTS Of 117 lesions in 105 patients, 65 (55.6%) were ADH, 48 (41.0%) were LN, and 4 (3.4%) were FEA. Most PVs (83.8%) were in the BRCA1/2, CHEK2 and ATM genes. ADH and FEA were excised in most cases (87.1%), with upgrade rates of 11.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-23.4%) and 0%, respectively. LN was selectively excised (53.8%); upgrade rate in the excision group was 4.8% (95% CI 0.8-22.7%), and with 20 months of median follow-up, no same-site cancers developed in the observation group. Among those not upgraded, the 3-year risk of breast cancer development was 13.1% (95% CI 6.3-26.3%), mostly estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) disease (89.5%). CONCLUSIONS Upgrade rates for HRLs in patients with PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes appear similar to non-carriers. HRLs may be associated with increased short-term ER+ breast cancer risk in PV carriers, warranting strong consideration of surgical or chemoprevention therapies in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Laws
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Saskia Leonard
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Emma Hershey
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Samantha Stokes
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julie Vincuilla
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eshita Sharma
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kara Milliron
- Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Evaluation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Judy E Garber
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sofia D Merajver
- Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Evaluation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Riess O, Sturm M, Menden B, Liebmann A, Demidov G, Witt D, Casadei N, Admard J, Schütz L, Ossowski S, Taylor S, Schaffer S, Schroeder C, Dufke A, Haack T. Genomes in clinical care. NPJ Genom Med 2024; 9:20. [PMID: 38485733 PMCID: PMC10940576 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-024-00402-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, genome sequencing (GS) has become more affordable and the importance of genomics and multi-omics in clinical care is increasingly being recognized. However, how to scale and effectively implement GS on an institutional level remains a challenge for many. Here, we present Genome First and Ge-Med, two clinical implementation studies focused on identifying the key pillars and processes that are required to make routine GS and predictive genomics a reality in the clinical setting. We describe our experience and lessons learned for a variety of topics including test logistics, patient care processes, data reporting, and infrastructure. Our model of providing clinical care and comprehensive genomic analysis from a single source may be used by other centers with a similar structure to facilitate the implementation of omics-based personalized health concepts in medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaf Riess
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- NGS Competence Center Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- Center for Rare Diseases Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Marc Sturm
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Benita Menden
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alexandra Liebmann
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - German Demidov
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Dennis Witt
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Casadei
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- NGS Competence Center Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jakob Admard
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Leon Schütz
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Ossowski
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- NGS Competence Center Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics (IBMI), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Christopher Schroeder
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Dufke
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Haack
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cătană A, Trifa AP, Achimas-Cadariu PA, Bolba-Morar G, Lisencu C, Kutasi E, Chelaru VF, Muntean M, Martin DL, Antone NZ, Fetica B, Pop F, Militaru MS. Hereditary Breast Cancer in Romania-Molecular Particularities and Genetic Counseling Challenges in an Eastern European Country. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11051386. [PMID: 37239058 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11051386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
In Romania, breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women. However, there is limited data on the prevalence of predisposing germline mutations in the population in the era of precision medicine, where molecular testing has become an indispensable tool in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to determine the prevalence, mutational spectrum, and histopathological prediction factors for hereditary breast cancer (HBC) in Romania. A cohort of 411 women diagnosed with BC selected upon NCCN v.1.2020 guidelines underwent an 84-gene NGS-based panel testing for breast cancer risk assessment during 2018-2022 in the Department of Oncogenetics of the Oncological Institute of Cluj-Napoca, Romania. A total of 135 (33%) patients presented pathogenic mutations in 19 genes. The prevalence of genetic variants was determined, and demographic and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. We observed differences among BRCA and non-BRCA carriers regarding family history of cancer, age of onset, and histopathological subtypes. Triple-negative (TN) tumors were more often BRCA1 positive, unlike BRCA2 positive tumors, which were more often the Luminal B subtype. The most frequent non-BRCA mutations were found in CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2, and several recurrent variants were identified for each gene. Unlike other European countries, germline testing for HBC is still limited due to the high costs and is not covered by the National Health System (NSH), thus leading to significant discrepancies related to the screening and prophylaxis of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea Cătană
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Discipline of Medical Genetics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hațieganu, Victor Babeș 8, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Adrian P Trifa
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Discipline of Medical Genetics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Victor Babeș, Eftimie Murgu 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Patriciu A Achimas-Cadariu
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Oncology, Discipline of Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hațieganu, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Gabriela Bolba-Morar
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Carmen Lisencu
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Eniko Kutasi
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Discipline of Medical Genetics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hațieganu, Victor Babeș 8, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Vlad F Chelaru
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Discipline of Medical Genetics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hațieganu, Victor Babeș 8, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Maximilian Muntean
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Oncology, Discipline of Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hațieganu, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Daniela L Martin
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Nicoleta Z Antone
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Bogdan Fetica
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Florina Pop
- Breast Cancer Tumour Center, Institute of Oncology I. Chiricuță, Republicii Nr. 34-36, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Mariela S Militaru
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Discipline of Medical Genetics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hațieganu, Victor Babeș 8, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Trapani D, Sandoval J, Aliaga PT, Ascione L, Maria Berton Giachetti PP, Curigliano G, Ginsburg O. Screening Programs for Breast Cancer: Toward Individualized, Risk-Adapted Strategies of Early Detection. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 188:63-88. [PMID: 38175342 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-33602-7_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Early detection of breast cancer (BC) comprises two approaches: screening of asymptomatic women in a specified target population at risk (usually a target age range for women at average risk), and early diagnosis for women with BC signs and symptoms. Screening for BC is a key health intervention for early detection. While population-based screening programs have been implemented for age-selected women, the pivotal clinical trials have not addressed the global utility nor the improvement of screening performance by utilizing more refined parameters for patient eligibility, such as individualized risk stratification. In addition, with the exception of the subset of women known to carry germline pathogenetic mutations in (high- or moderately-penetrant) cancer predisposition genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, there has been less success in outreach and service provision for the unaffected relatives of women found to carry a high-risk mutation (i.e., "cascade testing") as it is in these individuals for whom such actionable information can result in cancers (and/or cancer deaths) being averted. Moreover, even in the absence of clinical cancer genetics services, as is the case for the immediate and at least near-term in most countries globally, the capacity to stratify the risk of an individual to develop BC has existed for many years, is available for free online at various sites/platforms, and is increasingly being validated for non-Caucasian populations. Ultimately, a precision approach to BC screening is largely missing. In the present chapter, we aim to address the concept of risk-adapted screening of BC, in multiple facets, and understand if there is a value in the implementation of adapted screening strategies in selected women, outside the established screening prescriptions, in the terms of age-range, screening modality and schedules of imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Josè Sandoval
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Unit of Population Epidemiology, Division and Department of Primary Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pamela Trillo Aliaga
- Division of New Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Liliana Ascione
- Division of New Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Pier Paolo Maria Berton Giachetti
- Division of New Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bychkovsky BL, Agaoglu NB, Horton C, Zhou J, Yussuf A, Hemyari P, Richardson ME, Young C, LaDuca H, McGuinness DL, Scheib R, Garber JE, Rana HQ. Differences in Cancer Phenotypes Among Frequent CHEK2 Variants and Implications for Clinical Care-Checking CHEK2. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1598-1606. [PMID: 36136322 PMCID: PMC9501803 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Germline CHEK2 pathogenic variants (PVs) are frequently detected by multigene cancer panel testing (MGPT), but our understanding of PVs beyond c.1100del has been limited. Objective To compare cancer phenotypes of frequent CHEK2 PVs individually and collectively by variant type. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was carried out in a single diagnostic testing laboratory from 2012 to 2019. Overall, 3783 participants with CHEK2 PVs identified via MGPT were included. Medical histories of cancer in participants with frequent PVs, negative MGPT (wild type), loss-of-function (LOF), and missense were compared. Main Outcomes and Measures Participants were stratified by CHEK2 PV type. Descriptive statistics were summarized including median (IQR) for continuous variables and proportions for categorical characteristics. Differences in age and proportions were assessed with Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher exact tests, respectively. Frequencies, odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and P values were corrected for multiple comparisons where appropriate. Results Of the 3783 participants with CHEK2 PVs, 3473 (92%) were female and most reported White race. Breast cancer was less frequent in participants with p.I157T (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.78; P<.001), p.S428F (OR, 0.59; 95% CI. 0.46-0.76; P<.001), and p.T476M (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98; P = .04) PVs compared with other PVs and an association with nonbreast cancers was not found. Following the exclusion of p.I157T, p.S428F, and p.T476M, participants with monoallelic CHEK2 PV had a younger age at first cancer diagnosis (P < .001) and were more likely to have breast (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.66-2.02; P < .001), thyroid (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.26-2.08; P < .001), and kidney cancer (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.75-3.68; P < .001) than the wild-type cohort. Participants with a CHEK2 PV were less likely to have a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.76; P < .001) compared with those in the wild-type cohort. There were no significant differences between frequent CHEK2 PVs and c.1100del and no differences between CHEK2 missense and LOF PVs. Conclusions and Relevance CHEK2 PVs, with few exceptions (p.I157T, p.S428F, and p.T476M), were associated with similar cancer phenotypes irrespective of variant type. CHEK2 PVs were not associated with colorectal cancer, but were associated with breast, kidney, and thyroid cancers. Compared with other CHEK2 PVs, the frequent p.I157T, p.S428F, and p.T476M alleles have an attenuated association with breast cancer and were not associated with nonbreast cancers. These data may inform the genetic counseling and care of individuals with CHEK2 PVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany L. Bychkovsky
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nihat B. Agaoglu
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medical Genetics, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Jing Zhou
- Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rochelle Scheib
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Judy E. Garber
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Huma Q. Rana
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang X, Chang MD, Lee MC, Niell BL. The Breast Cancer Screening and Timing of Breast MRI—Experience in a Genetic High-Risk Screening Clinic in a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:2119-2131. [PMID: 35323371 PMCID: PMC8947675 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
For women with genetic risk of breast cancer, the addition of screening breast MRI to mammography has become a standard. The order and interval of annual imaging can be variable among providers. To evaluate the clinical implications related to the timing, we conducted a chart review on a cohort of women (N = 276) with high-risk (BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, PTEN and TP53) and moderate high-risk (ATM and CHEK2) predisposition to breast cancer in a 48-month follow up. The estimated MRI detection rate in the entire group is 1.75% (18 per 1000 MRI tests). For the high-risk group, the estimated rate is 2.98% (30 per 1000 MRI tests). Many women discovered their genetic risk at an age much older (average age of the high-risk group was 48 years) than the age recommended to initiate enhanced screening (age 20 to 25 years). In total, 4 of the 11 primary breast cancers detected were identified by screening MRI within the first month after initial visit, which were not detected by previous mammography, suggesting the benefit of initiating MRI immediately after the discovery of genetic risk. Breast screening findings for women with Lynch syndrome and neurofibromatosis type 1 were also included in this report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Wang
- GeneHome, Department of Individualized Cancer Management, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
- Correspondence:
| | - Maxine D. Chang
- GeneHome, Department of Individualized Cancer Management, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| | - Marie Catherine Lee
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| | - Bethany L. Niell
- Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Personalized Screening and Prevention Based on Genetic Risk of Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00443-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|