Evolution of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Tumor Disposition Model to Predict Preclinical Tumor Pharmacokinetics of Trastuzumab-Emtansine (T-DM1)

Quantitative evaluation of trastuzumab deruxtecan pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in mouse models of varying degrees of HER2 expression

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201; ENHERTU®) is a human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody drug conjugate (ADC) with demonstrated antitumor activity against a range of tumor types. Aiming to understand the relationship between antigen expression and downstream efficacy outcomes, T-DXd was administered in tumor-bearing mice carrying NCI-N87, Capan-1, JIMT-1, and MDA-MB-468 xenografts, characterized by varying HER2 levels. Plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of total antibody, T-DXd, and released DXd and tumor concentrations of released DXd were evaluated, in addition to monitoring γΗ2AX and pRAD50 pharmacodynamic (PD) response. A positive relationship was observed between released DXd concentrations in tumor and HER2 expression, with NCI-N87 xenografts characterized by the highest exposures compared to the remaining cell lines. γΗ2AX and pRAD50 demonstrated a sustained increase over several days occurring with a time delay relative to tumoral-released DXd concentrations. In vitro investigations of cell-based DXd disposition facilitated the characterization of DXd kinetics across tumor cells. These outputs were incorporated into a mechanistic mathematical model, utilized to describe PK/PD trends. The model captured plasma PK across dosing arms as well as tumor PK in NCI-N87, Capan-1, and MDA-MB-468 models; tumor concentrations in JIMT-1 xenografts required additional parameter adjustments reflective of complex receptor dynamics. γΗ2AX longitudinal trends were well characterized via a unified PD model implemented across xenografts demonstrating the robustness of measured PD trends. This work supports the application of a mechanistic model as a quantitative tool, reliably projecting tumor payload concentrations upon T-DXd administration, as the first step towards preclinical-to-clinical translation.

Towards a platform quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model for preclinical to clinical translation of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs)

A next generation multiscale quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model for antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) is presented, for preclinical to clinical translation of ADC efficacy. Two HER2 ADCs (trastuzumab-DM1 and trastuzumab-DXd) were used for model development, calibration, and validation. The model integrates drug specific experimental data including in vitro cellular disposition data, pharmacokinetic (PK) and tumor growth inhibition (TGI) data for T-DM1 and T-DXd, as well as system specific data such as properties of HER2, tumor growth rates, and volumes. The model incorporates mechanistic detail at the intracellular level, to account for different mechanisms of ADC processing and payload release. It describes the disposition of the ADC, antibody, and payload inside and outside of the tumor, including binding to off-tumor, on-target sinks. The resulting multiscale PK model predicts plasma and tumor concentrations of ADC and payload. Tumor payload concentrations predicted by the model were linked to a TGI model and used to describe responses following ADC administration to xenograft mice. The model was translated to humans and virtual clinical trial simulations were performed that successfully predicted progression free survival response for T-DM1 and T-DXd for the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, including differential efficacy based upon HER2 expression status. In conclusion, the presented model is a step toward a platform QSP model and strategy for ADCs, integrating multiple types of data and knowledge to predict ADC efficacy. The model has potential application to facilitate ADC design, lead candidate selection, and clinical dosing schedule optimization.

Clinical validation of translational antibody PBPK model using tissue distribution data generated with 89Zr-immuno-PET imaging

The main objective of this manuscript was to validate the ability of the monoclonal antibody physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict tissue concentrations of antibodies in the human. To accomplish this goal, preclinical and clinical tissue distribution and positron emission tomography imaging data generated using zirconium-89 (89Zr) labeled antibodies were obtained from the literature. First, our previously published translational PBPK model for antibodies was expanded to describe the whole-body biodistribution of 89Zr labeled antibody and the free 89Zr, as well as residualization of free 89Zr. Subsequently, the model was optimized using mouse biodistribution data, where it was observed that free 89Zr mainly residualizes in the bone and the extent of antibody distribution in certain tissues (e.g., liver and spleen) may be altered by labeling with 89Zr. The mouse PBPK model was scaled to rat, monkey, and human by simply changing the physiological parameters, and a priori simulations performed by the model were compared with the observed PK data. It was found that model predicted antibody PK in majority of the tissues in all the species superimposed over the observed data, and the model was also able to predict the PK of antibody in human tissues reasonably well. As such, the work presented here provides unprecedented evaluation of the antibody PPBK model for its ability to predict tissue PK of antibodies in the clinic. This model can be used for preclinical-to-clinical translation of antibodies and for prediction of antibody concentrations at the site-of-action in the clinic.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of TAK-164 Antibody Drug Conjugate Coadministered with Unconjugated Antibody

The development of new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has led to the approval of 7 ADCs by the FDA in 4 years. Given the impact of intratumoral distribution on efficacy of these therapeutics, coadministration of unconjugated antibody with ADC has been shown to improve distribution and efficacy of several ADCs in high and moderately expressed tumor target systems by increasing tissue penetration. However, the benefit of coadministration in low expression systems is less clear. TAK-164, an ADC composed of an anti-GCC antibody (5F9) conjugated to a DGN549 payload, has demonstrated heterogeneous distribution and bystander killing. Here, we evaluated the impact of 5F9 coadministration on distribution and efficacy of TAK-164 in a primary human tumor xenograft mouse model. Coadministration was found to improve the distribution of TAK-164 within the tumor, but it had no significant impact (increase or decrease) on efficacy. Experimental and computational evidence indicates that this was not a result of tumor saturation, increased binding to perivascular cells, or compensatory bystander effects. Rather, the cellular potency of DGN549 was matched with the single-cell uptake of TAK-164 making its IC50 close to its equilibrium binding affinity (KD), and as such, coadministration dilutes total DGN549 in cells below the maximum cytotoxic concentration, thereby offsetting an increased number of targeted cells with decreased ability to kill each cell. These results provide new insights on matching payload potency to ADC delivery to help identify when increasing tumor penetration is beneficial for improving ADC efficacy and demonstrate how mechanistic simulations can be leveraged to design clinically effective ADCs.

ADME and DMPK considerations for the discovery and development of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs)

 The therapeutic concept of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) is to selectively target tumour cells with small molecule cytotoxic drugs to maximise cell kill benefit and minimise healthy tissue toxicity.An ADC generally consists of an antibody that targets a protein on the surface of tumour cells chemically linked to a warhead small molecule cytotoxic drug.To deliver the warhead to the tumour cell, the antibody must bind to the target protein and in general be internalised into the cell. Following internalisation, the cytotoxic agent can be released in the endosomal or lysosomal compartment (via different mechanisms). Diffusion or transport out of the endosome or lysosome allows the cytotoxic drug to express its cell-killing pharmacology. Alternatively, some ADCs (e.g. EDB-ADCs) rely on extracellular cleavage releasing membrane permeable warheads.One potentially important aspect of the ADC mechanism is the 'bystander effect' whereby the cytotoxic drug released in the targeted cell can diffuse out of that cell and into other (non-target expressing) tumour cells to exert its cytotoxic effect. This is important as solid tumours tend to be heterogeneous and not all cells in a tumour will express the targeted protein.The combination of large and small molecule aspects in an ADC poses significant challenges to the disposition scientist in describing the ADME properties of the entire molecule.This article will review the ADC landscape and the ADME properties of successful ADCs, with the aim of outlining best practice and providing a perspective of how the field can further facilitate the discovery and development of these important therapeutic modalities.

Development of and insights from systems pharmacology models of antibody‐drug conjugates

Antibody‐drug conjugates (ADCs) have gained traction in the oncology space in the past few decades, with significant progress being made in recent years. Although the use of pharmacometric modeling is well‐established in the drug development process, there is an increasing need for a better quantitative biological understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships of these complex molecules. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) approaches can assist in this endeavor; recent computational QSP models incorporate ADC‐specific mechanisms and use data‐driven simulations to predict experimental outcomes. Various modeling approaches and platforms have been developed at the in vitro, in vivo, and clinical scales, and can be further integrated to facilitate preclinical to clinical translation. These new tools can help researchers better understand the nature and mechanisms of these targeted therapies to help achieve a more favorable therapeutic window. This review delves into the world of systems pharmacology modeling of ADCs, discussing various modeling efforts in the field thus far.

Predictive Simulations in Preclinical Oncology to Guide the Translation of Biologics

Preclinical in vivo studies form the cornerstone of drug development and translation, bridging in vitro experiments with first-in-human trials. However, despite the utility of animal models, translation from the bench to bedside remains difficult, particularly for biologics and agents with unique mechanisms of action. The limitations of these animal models may advance agents that are ineffective in the clinic, or worse, screen out compounds that would be successful drugs. One reason for such failure is that animal models often allow clinically intolerable doses, which can undermine translation from otherwise promising efficacy studies. Other times, tolerability makes it challenging to identify the necessary dose range for clinical testing. With the ability to predict pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses, mechanistic simulations can help advance candidates from in vitro to in vivo and clinical studies. Here, we use basic insights into drug disposition to analyze the dosing of antibody drug conjugates (ADC) and checkpoint inhibitor dosing (PD-1 and PD-L1) in the clinic. The results demonstrate how simulations can identify the most promising clinical compounds rather than the most effective in vitro and preclinical in vivo agents. Likewise, the importance of quantifying absolute target expression and antibody internalization is critical to accurately scale dosing. These predictive models are capable of simulating clinical scenarios and providing results that can be validated and updated along the entire development pipeline starting in drug discovery. Combined with experimental approaches, simulations can guide the selection of compounds at early stages that are predicted to have the highest efficacy in the clinic.

Development and Evaluation of Competitive Inhibitors of Trastuzumab-HER2 Binding to Bypass the Binding-Site Barrier

Our group has developed and experimentally validated a strategy to increase antibody penetration in solid tumors through transient inhibition of antibody-antigen binding. In prior work, we demonstrated that 1HE, an anti-trastuzumab single domain antibody that transiently inhibits trastuzumab binding to HER2, increased the penetration of trastuzumab and increased the efficacy of ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2+ xenograft bearing mice. In the present work, 1HE variants were developed using random mutagenesis and phage display to enable optimization of tumor penetration and efficacy of trastuzumab-based therapeutics. To guide the rational selection of a particular 1HE mutant for a specific trastuzumab-therapy, we developed a mechanistic pharmacokinetic (PK) model to predict within-tumor exposure of trastuzumab/T-DM1. A pharmacodynamic (PD) component was added to the model to predict the relationship between intratumor exposure to T-DM1 and the corresponding therapeutic effect in HER2+ xenografts. To demonstrate the utility of the competitive inhibition approach for immunotoxins, PK parameters specific for a recombinant immunotoxin were incorporated into the model structure. Dissociation half-lives for variants ranged from 1.1 h (for variant LG11) to 107.9 h (for variant HE10). Simulations predicted that 1HE co-administration can increase the tumor penetration of T-DM1, with inhibitors with longer trastuzumab binding half-lives relative to 1HE (15.5 h) further increasing T-DM1 penetration at the expense of total tumor uptake of T-DM1. The PK/PD model accurately predicted the response of NCI-N87 xenografts to treatment with T-DM1 or T-DM1 co-administered with 1HE. Model predictions indicate that the 1HE mutant HF9, with a trastuzumab binding half-life of 51.1 h, would be the optimal inhibitor for increasing T-DM1 efficacy with a modest extension in the median survival time relative to T-DM1 with 1HE. Model simulations predict that LG11 co-administration will dramatically increase immunotoxin penetration within all tumor regions. We expect that the mechanistic model structure and the wide range of inhibitors developed in this work will enable optimization of trastuzumab-cytotoxin penetration and efficacy in solid tumors.

Development of a Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Whole-Body Disposition of MMAE Containing Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Mice

PURPOSE

To quantitate and mathematically characterize the whole-body pharmacokinetics (PK) of different ADC analytes following administration of an MMAE-conjugated ADC in tumor-bearing mice.

METHODS

The PK of different ADC analytes (total antibody, total drug, unconjugated drug) was measured following administration of an MMAE-conjugated ADC in tumor-bearing mice. The PK of ADC analytes was compared with the whole-body PK of the antibody and drug obtained following administration of these molecules alone. An ADC PBPK model was developed by linking antibody PBPK model with small-molecule PBPK model, where the drug was assumed to deconjugate in DAR-dependent manner.

RESULTS

Comparison of antibody biodistribution coefficient (ABC) values for total antibody suggests that conjugation of drug did not significantly affect the PK of antibody. Comparison of tissue:plasma AUC ratio (T/P) for the conjugated drug and total antibody suggests that in certain tissues (e.g., spleen) ADC may demonstrate higher deconjugation. It was observed that the tissue distribution profile of the drug can be altered following its conjugation to antibody. For example, MMAE distribution to the liver was found to increase while its distribution to the heart was found to decrease upon conjugation to antibody. MMAE exposure in the tumor was found to increase by ~20-fold following administration as conjugate (i.e., ADC). The PBPK model was able to a priori predict the PK of all three ADC analytes in plasma, tissues, and tumor reasonably well.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADC PBPK model developed here serves as a platform for translational and clinical investigations of MMAE containing ADCs.

Simulating the Selection of Resistant Cells with Bystander Killing and Antibody Coadministration in Heterogeneous Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Tumors

Intratumoral heterogeneity is a leading cause of treatment failure resulting in tumor recurrence. For the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), two major types of resistance include changes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and reduced payload sensitivity, which is often exacerbated by heterogenous HER2 expression and ADC distribution during treatment. ADCs with bystander payloads, such as trastuzumab-monomethyl auristatin E (T-MMAE), can reach and kill adjacent cells with lower receptor expression that cannot be targeted directly with the ADC. Additionally, coadministration of T-DM1 with its unconjugated antibody, trastuzumab, can improve distribution and minimize heterogeneous delivery. However, the effectiveness of trastuzumab coadministration and ADC bystander killing in heterogenous tumors in reducing the selection of resistant cells is not well understood. Here, we use an agent-based model to predict outcomes with these different regimens. The simulations demonstrate that both T-DM1 and T-MMAE benefit from trastuzumab coadministration for tumors with high average receptor expression (up to 70% and 40% decrease in average tumor volume, respectively), with greater benefit for nonbystander payloads. However, the benefit decreases as receptor expression is reduced, reversing at low concentrations (up to 360% and 430% increase in average tumor volume for T-DM1 and T-MMAE, respectively) for this mechanism that impacts both ADC distribution and efficacy. For tumors with intrinsic payload resistance, coadministration uniformly exhibits better efficacy than ADC monotherapy (50%-70% and 19%-36% decrease in average tumor volume for T-DM1 and T-MMAE, respectively). Finally, we demonstrate that several regimens select for resistant cells at clinical tolerable doses, which highlights the need to pursue other mechanisms of action for durable treatment responses. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Experimental evidence demonstrates heterogeneity in the distribution of both the antibody-drug conjugate and the target receptor in the tumor microenvironment, which can promote the selection of resistant cells and lead to recurrence. This study quantifies the impact of increasing the antibody dose and utilizing bystander payloads in heterogeneous tumors. Alternative cell-killing mechanisms are needed to avoid enriching resistant cell populations.

Quantitative Evaluation of the Effect of Antigen Expression Level on Antibody-Drug Conjugate Exposure in Solid Tumor

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) rely on high expression of target antigens on cancer cells to effectively enter the cell and release a cytotoxic payload. Previous studies have shown that ADC efficacy is not always tied to antigen expression. However, our recent in vitro study suggests a linear relationship between antigen expression and the intracellular levels of the ADC payload. In this study, we have explored the relationship between antigen expression and intratumoral ADC exposure in vivo. Using trastuzumab-vc-MMAE (T-vc-MMAE) and four cell lines with varying expression of human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), the pharmacokinetics of total trastuzumab, released ("free") MMAE, and total MMAE were evaluated in a tumor xenograft model. Nude mice were implanted with tumors originating from BT-474, MDA-MB-453, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-468 cell lines and dosed with 10 mg/kg or 1 mg/kg of ADC. Observed data were mathematically characterized using a mechanism-based PK model. A strong positive correlation was observed between antigen expression levels and free/total MMAE exposure (R² ≥ 0.91) (total MMAE being the sum of released and conjugated MMAE) within the tumor, but not for total trastuzumab exposure. The PK model was able to recapitulate plasma PK through simulation; however, the tumor PK was overpredicted or underpredicted in some cases potentially due to differences in tumor vasculature or extracellular matrix conditions. Our results indicate a linear relationship between antigen expression and tumor exposure of free/total ADC payload in vivo, validating our previous finding in vitro, while also revealing the need to understand complex physiology of the tumor to predict tumor PK of ADC and its components. Our findings also support the concept of antigen expression screening in patients for targeted therapies like ADCs to achieve the maximum therapeutic benefit of the treatment.

Mechanistic Modeling of Intra-Tumor Spatial Distribution of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Insights into Dosing Strategies in Oncology

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) provide targeted delivery of cytotoxic agents directly inside tumor cells. However, many ADCs targeting solid tumors have exhibited limited clinical efficacy, in part, due to insufficient penetration within tumors. To better understand the relationship between ADC tumor penetration and efficacy, previously applied Krogh cylinder models that explore tumor growth dynamics following ADC administration in preclinical species were expanded to a clinical framework by integrating clinical pharmacokinetics, tumor penetration, and tumor growth inhibition. The objective of this framework is to link ADC tumor penetration and distribution to clinical efficacy. The model was validated by comparing virtual patient population simulations to observed overall response rates from trastuzumab‐DM1 treated patients with metastatic breast cancer. To capture clinical outcomes, we expanded upon previous Krogh cylinder models to include the additional mechanism of heterogeneous tumor growth inhibition spatially across the tumor. This expansion mechanistically captures clinical response rates by describing heterogeneous ADC binding and tumor cell killing; high binding and tumor cell death close to capillaries vs. low binding, and high tumor cell proliferation far from capillaries. Sensitivity analyses suggest that clinical efficacy could be optimized through dose fractionation, and that clinical efficacy is primarily dependent on the ADC‐target affinity, payload potency, and tumor growth rate. This work offers a mechanistic basis to predict and optimize ADC clinical efficacy for solid tumors, allowing dosing strategy optimization to improve patient outcomes.

The role of autophagy in the cytotoxicity induced by trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive breast cancer cells

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) of trastuzumab and cytotoxic agent emtansine (DM1), has been approved for the therapy of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer after prior treatment of trastuzumab and taxane. The impressive efficacy exhibited by T-DM1 has heightened the need for more further studies on the underlying mechanisms of T-DM1 cytotoxicity. Previous research suggested that autophagy was crucial for cancer therapy, but the role of autophagy in T-DM1 treatment has not been investigated. Here, we demonstrated for the first time that T-DM1 triggered obvious autophagy in HER2-positive SK-BR-3 and BT-474 breast cancer cells. Blocking autophagy with pharmacological inhibitors chloroquine (CQ) or LY294002 partly reduced T-DM1-induced apoptosis and Caspase-3/7 activation, suggesting that autophagy played an essential role in the cytotoxicity induced by T-DM1 in HER2-positive breast cancer cells. Further investigation demonstrated that Akt/mTOR signaling pathway was involved in T-DM1-induced autophagy in a time-dependent manner. Altogether, our results highlighted the important role of autophagy as a novel mechanism for T-DM1-induced cytotoxicity and elucidated the critical relationships between T-DM1-induced autophagy and apoptosis in human HER2-positive breast cancer cells, which provides novel insight into the underlying anti-tumor mechanism of T-DM1.

The biodistribution of therapeutic proteins: Mechanism, implications for pharmacokinetics, and methods of evaluation

Therapeutic proteins (TPs) are a diverse drug class that include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), recombinantly expressed enzymes, hormones and growth factors, cytokines (e.g. chemokines, interleukins, interferons), as well as a wide range of engineered fusion scaffolds containing IgG1 Fc domain for half-life extension. As the pharmaceutical industry advances more potent and selective protein-based medicines through discovery and into the clinical stages of development, it has become widely appreciated that a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of TP biodistribution can aid this endeavor. This review aims to highlight the literature that has advanced our understanding of the determinants of TP biodistribution. A particular emphasis is placed on the multi-faceted role of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) in mAb and Fc-fusion protein disposition. In addition, characterization of the TP-target interaction at the cell-level is discussed as an essential strategy to establish pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships that may lead to more informed human dose projections during clinical development. Methods for incorporation of tissue and cell-level parameters defining these characteristics into higher-order mechanistic and semi-mechanistic PK models will also be presented.

Evolution of the Systems Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics Model for Antibody-Drug Conjugates to Characterize Tumor Heterogeneity and In Vivo Bystander Effect

The objective of this work was to develop a systems pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) model that can characterize in vivo bystander effect of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) in a heterogeneous tumor. To accomplish this goal, a coculture xenograft tumor with 50% GFP-MCF7 (HER2-low) and 50% N87 (HER2-high) cells was developed. The relative composition of a heterogeneous tumor for each cell type was experimentally determined by immunohistochemistry analysis. Trastuzumab-vc-MMAE (T-vc-MMAE) was used as a tool ADC. Plasma and tumor PK of T-vc-MMAE was analyzed in N87, GFP-MCF7, and coculture tumor-bearing mice. In addition, tumor growth inhibition (TGI) studies were conducted in all three xenografts at different T-vc-MMAE dose levels. To characterize the PK of ADC in coculture tumors, our previously published tumor distribution model was evolved to account for different cell populations. The evolved tumor PK model was able to a priori predict the PK of all ADC analytes in the coculture tumors reasonably well. The tumor PK model was subsequently integrated with a PD model that used intracellular tubulin occupancy to drive ADC efficacy in each cell type. The final systems PK-PD model was able to simultaneously characterize all the TGI data reasonably well, with a common set of parameters for MMAE-induced cytotoxicity. The model was later used to simulate the effect of different dosing regimens and tumor compositions on the bystander effect of ADC. The model simulations suggested that dose-fractionation regimen may further improve overall efficacy and bystander effect of ADCs by prolonging the tubulin occupancy in each cell type. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A PK-PD analysis is presented to understand bystander effect of Trastuzumab-vc-MMAE ADC in antigen (Ag)-low, Ag-high, and coculture (i.e., Ag-high + Ag-low) xenograft mice. This study also describes a novel single cell-level systems PK-PD model to characterize in vivo bystander effect of ADCs. The proposed model can serve as a platform to mathematically characterize multiple cell populations and their interactions in tumor tissues. Our analysis also suggests that fractionated dosing regimen may help improve the bystander effect of ADCs.

Evaluation of Quantitative Relationship Between Target Expression and Antibody-Drug Conjugate Exposure Inside Cancer Cells

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) employ overexpressed cell surface antigens to deliver cytotoxic payloads inside cancer cells. However, the relationship between target expression and ADC efficacy remains ambiguous. In this manuscript, we have addressed a part of this ambiguity by quantitatively investigating the effect of antigen expression levels on ADC exposure within cancer cells. Trastuzumab-valine-citrulline-monomethyl auristatin E was used as a model ADC, and four different cell lines with diverse levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression were used as model cells. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of total trastuzumab, released monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), and total MMAE were measured inside the cells and in the cell culture media following incubation with two different concentrations of ADC. In addition, target expression levels, target internalization rate, and cathepsin B and MDR1 protein concentrations were determined for each cell line. All the PK data were mathematically characterized using a cell-level systems PK model for ADC. It was found that SKBR-3, MDA-MB-453, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-468 cells had ∼800,000, ∼250,000, ∼50,000, and ∼10,000 HER2 receptors per cell, respectively. A strong linear relationship (R ² > 0.9) was observed between HER2 receptor count and released MMAE exposure inside the cancer cells. There was an inverse relationship found between HER2 expression level and internalization rate, and cathepsin B and multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) expression level varied slightly among the cell lines. The PK model was able to simultaneously capture all the PK profiles reasonably well while estimating only two parameters. Our results demonstrate a strong quantitative relationship between antigen expression level and intracellular exposure of ADCs in cancer cells. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In this manuscript, we have demonstrated a strong linear relationship between target expression level and antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) exposure inside cancer cells. We have also shown that this relationship can be accurately captured using the cell-level systems pharmacokinetics model developed for ADCs. Our results indirectly suggest that the lack of relationship between target expression and efficacy of ADC may stem from differences in the pharmacodynamic properties of cancer cells.

Antibody Coadministration as a Strategy to Overcome Binding-Site Barrier for ADCs: a Quantitative Investigation

It has been proposed that the binding-site barrier (BSB) for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) can be overcome with the help of antibody coadministration. However, broad utility of this strategy remains in question. Consequently, here, we have conducted in vivo experiments and pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) modeling and simulation (M&S) to further evaluate the antibody coadministration hypothesis in a quantitative manner. Two different Trastuzumab-based ADCs, T-DM1 (no bystander effect) and T-vc-MMAE (with a bystander effect), were evaluated in high-HER2 (N87) and low-HER2 (MDA-MB-453) expressing tumors, with or without the coadministration of 1, 3, or 8-fold higher Trastuzumab. The tumor growth inhibition (TGI) data was quantitatively characterized using a semi-mechanistic PK-PD model to determine the nature of drug interaction for each coadministration regimen, by estimating the interaction parameter ψ. It was found that the coadministration strategy improved ADC efficacy under certain conditions and had no impact on ADC efficacy in others. The benefit was more pronounced for N87 tumors with very high antigen expression levels where the effect on treatment was synergistic (a synergistic drug interaction, ψ = 2.86 [2.6-3.12]). The benefit was diminished in tumor with lower antigen expression (MDA-MB-453) and payload with bystander effect. Under these conditions, the coadministration regimens resulted in an additive or even less than additive benefit (ψ ≤ 1). As such, our results suggest that while antibody coadministration may be helpful for ADCs in certain circumstances, one should not broadly apply this strategy to all the scenarios without first identifying the costs and benefits of this approach.

HER2-Overexpressing/Amplified Breast Cancer as a Testing Ground for Antibody-Drug Conjugate Drug Development in Solid Tumors

Efficacy data from the KATHERINE clinical trial, comparing the HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) to trastuzumab in patients with early-stage HER2-amplified/overexpressing breast cancer with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy, demonstrates superiority of T-DM1 (HR for invasive disease or death, 0.50; P < 0.001). This establishes foundational precedent for ADCs as effective therapy for treatment of subclinical micrometastasis in an adjuvant (or post-neoadjuvant) early-stage solid tumor setting. Despite this achievement, general principles from proposed systems pharmacokinetic modeling for intracellular processing of ADCs indicate potential shortcomings of T-DM1: (i) C _max limited by toxicities; (ii) slow internalization rate; (iii) resistance mechanisms due to defects in intracellular trafficking [loss of lysosomal transporter solute carrier family 46 member 3, (SLC46A3)], and increased expression of drug transporters MDR1 and MRP1; and (iv) lack of payload bystander effects limiting utility in tumors with heterogeneous HER2 expression. These handicaps may explain the inferiority of T-DM1-based therapy in the neoadjuvant and first-line metastatic HER2⁺ breast cancer settings, and lack of superiority to chemotherapy in HER2⁺ advanced gastric cancer. In this review, we discuss how each of these limitations is being addressed by manipulating internalization and trafficking using HER2:HER2 bispecific or biparatopic antibody backbones, using site-specific, fixed DAR conjugation chemistry, and payload swapping to exploit alternative intracellular targets and to promote bystander effects. Newer HER2-directed ADCs have impressive clinical activity even against tumors with lower levels of HER2 receptor expression. Finally, we highlight ongoing clinical efforts to combine HER2 ADCs with other treatment modalities, including chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapies, and immunotherapy.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Drug Delivery Systems

The use of drug delivery systems (DDS) is an attractive approach to facilitate uptake of therapeutic agents at the desired site of action, particularly when free drug has poor pharmacokinetics/biodistribution (PK/BD) or significant off-site toxicities. Successful translation of DDS into the clinic is dependent on a thorough understanding of the in vivo behavior of the carrier, which has, for the most part, been an elusive goal. This is, at least in part, due to significant differences in the mechanisms controlling pharmacokinetics for classic drugs and DDSs. In this review, we summarize the key physiologic mechanisms controlling the in vivo behavior of DDS, compare and contrast this with classic drugs, and describe engineering strategies designed to improve DDS PK/BD. In addition, we describe quantitative approaches that could be useful for describing PK/BD of DDS, as well as critical steps between tissue uptake and pharmacologic effect.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling, Preclinical Characterization, Clinical Studies, and Lessons Learned

Antibody-drug conjugates are an emerging class of biopharmaceuticals changing the landscape of targeted chemotherapy. These conjugates combine the target specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the anti-cancer activity of small-molecule therapeutics. Several antibody-drug conjugates have received approval for the treatment of various types of cancer including gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg^®), brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris^®), trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla^®), and inotuzumab ozogamicin, which recently received approval (Besponsa^®). In addition to these approved therapies, there are many antibody-drug conjugates in the drug development pipeline and in clinical trials, although these fall outside the scope of this article. Understanding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibody-drug conjugates and the development of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models is indispensable, albeit challenging as there are many parameters to incorporate including the disposition of the intact antibody-drug conjugate complex, the antibody, and the drug agents following their dissociation in the body. In this review, we discuss how antibody-drug conjugates progressed over time, the challenges in their development, and how our understanding of their pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics led to greater strides towards successful targeted therapy programs.

Modeling to capture bystander-killing effect by released payload in target positive tumor cells

Background

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are intended to bind to specific positive target antigens and eradicate only tumor cells from an intracellular released payload through the lysosomal protease. Payloads, such as MMAE, have the capacity to kill adjacent antigen-negative (Ag–) tumor cells, which is called the bystander-killing effect, as well as directly kill antigen-positive (Ag+) tumor cells. We propose that a dose-response curve should be independently considered to account for target antigen-positive/negative tumor cells.

Methods

A model was developed to account for the payload in Ag+/Ag– cells and the associated parameters were applied. A tumor growth inhibition (TGI) effect was explored based on an ordinary differential equation (ODE) after substituting the payload concentration in Ag+/Ag– cells into an Emax model, which accounts for the dose-response curve. To observe the bystander-killing effects based on the amount of Ag+/Ag– cells, the Emax model is used independently. TGI models based on ODE are unsuitable for describing the initial delay through a tumor–drug interaction. This was solved using an age-structured model based on the stochastic process.

Results

β∈(0,1] is a fraction parameter that determines the proportion of cells that consist of Ag+/Ag– cells. The payload concentration decreases when the ratio of efflux to influx increases. The bystander-killing effect differs with varying amounts of Ag+ cells. The larger β is, the less bystander-killing effect. The decrease of the bystander-killing effect becomes stronger as Ag+ cells become larger than the Ag– cells. Overall, the ratio of efflux to influx, the amount of released payload, and the proportion of Ag+ cells determine the efficacy of the ADC. The tumor inhibition delay through a payload-tumor interaction, which goes through several stages, may be solved using an age-structured model.

Conclusions

The bystander-killing effect, one of the most important topics of ADCs, has been explored in several studies without the use of modeling. We propose that the bystander-killing effect can be captured through a mathematical model when considering the Ag+ and Ag– cells. In addition, the TGI model based on the age-structure can capture the initial delay through a drug interaction as well as the bystander-killing effect.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5336-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Cell-Level Systems PK-PD Model to Characterize In Vivo Efficacy of ADCs

Here, we have presented the development of a systems pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) model for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which uses intracellular target occupancy to drive in-vivo efficacy. The model is built based on PK and efficacy data generated using Trastuzumab-Valine-Citrulline-Monomethyl Auristatin E (T-vc-MMAE) ADC in N87 (high-HER2) and GFP-MCF7 (low-HER2) tumor bearing mice. It was observed that plasma PK of all ADC analytes was similar between the two tumor models; however, total trastuzumab, unconjugated MMAE, and total MMAE exposures were >10-fold, ~1.6-fold, and ~1.8-fold higher in N87 tumors. In addition, a prolonged retention of MMAE was observed within the tumors of both the mouse models, suggesting intracellular binding of MMAE to tubulin. A systems PK model, developed by integrating single-cell PK model with tumor distribution model, was able to capture all in vivo PK data reasonably well. Intracellular occupancy of tubulin predicted by the PK model was used to drive the efficacy of ADC using a novel PK-PD model. It was found that the same set of PD parameters was able to capture MMAE induced killing of GFP-MCF7 and N87 cells in vivo. These observations highlight the benefit of adopting a systems approach for ADC and provide a robust and predictive framework for successful clinical translation of ADCs.

A "Dual" Cell-Level Systems PK-PD Model to Characterize the Bystander Effect of ADC

Here, we have developed a cell-level systems PK-PD model to characterize the bystander effect of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Cytotoxicity data generated following incubation of Trastuzumab-vc-MMAE in cocultures of high HER2-expressing N87 and low HER2-expressing GFP-MCF7 cells were used to build the model. Single-cell PK model for ADC was used to characterize the PK of trastuzumab-vc-MMAE and released MMAE in N87 and GFP-MCF7 cells. The 2 cell-level PK models were mechanistically integrated to mimic the coculture condition. MMAE-induced intracellular occupancy of tubulin was used to drive the efficacy of ADC, and improvement in the tubulin occupancy of GFP-MCF7 cells in the presence of N87 cells was used to drive the bystander effect of trastuzumab-vc-MMAE. The "dual" cell-level PK-PD model was able to capture the observed data reasonably well. It was found that similar and high occupancy of tubulin by MMAE was required to achieve the cytotoxic effect in each cell line. In addition, estimated model parameters suggested that ∼60% improvement in the tubulin occupancy was required to attain half of the maximum bystander killing effect by the ADC. The presented model provides foundation for in vivo systems PK-PD model to characterize and predict the bystander effect of ADCs.

Pharmacokinetics of protein and peptide conjugates

Protein and peptide conjugates have become an important component of therapeutic and diagnostic medicine. These conjugates are primarily designed to improve pharmacokinetics (PK) of those therapeutic or imaging agents, which do not possess optimal disposition characteristics. In this review we have summarized preclinical and clinical PK of diverse protein and peptide conjugates, and have showcased how different conjugation approaches are used to obtain the desired PK. We have classified the conjugates into peptide conjugates, non-targeted protein conjugates, and targeted protein conjugates, and have highlighted diagnostic and therapeutic applications of these conjugates. In general, peptide conjugates demonstrate very short half-life and rapid renal elimination, and they are mainly designed to achieve high contrast ratio for imaging agents or to deliver therapeutic agents at sites not reachable by bulky or non-targeted proteins. Conjugates made from non-targeted proteins like albumin are designed to increase the half-life of rapidly eliminating therapeutic or imaging agents, and improve their delivery to tissues like solid tumors and inflamed joints. Targeted protein conjugates are mainly developed from antibodies, antibody derivatives, or endogenous proteins, and they are designed to improve the contrast ratio of imaging agents or therapeutic index of therapeutic agents, by enhancing their delivery to the site-of-action.

Prediction of non-linear pharmacokinetics in humans of an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) when evaluation of higher doses in animals is limited by tolerability: Case study with an anti-CD33 ADC

For antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that carry a cytotoxic drug, doses that can be administered in preclinical studies are typically limited by tolerability, leading to a narrow dose range that can be tested. For molecules with non-linear pharmacokinetics (PK), this limited dose range may be insufficient to fully characterize the PK of the ADC and limits translation to humans. Mathematical PK models are frequently used for molecule selection during preclinical drug development and for translational predictions to guide clinical study design. Here, we present a practical approach that uses limited PK and receptor occupancy (RO) data of the corresponding unconjugated antibody to predict ADC PK when conjugation does not alter the non-specific clearance or the antibody-target interaction. We used a 2-compartment model incorporating non-specific and specific (target mediated) clearances, where the latter is a function of RO, to describe the PK of anti-CD33 ADC with dose-limiting neutropenia in cynomolgus monkeys. We tested our model by comparing PK predictions based on the unconjugated antibody to observed ADC PK data that was not utilized for model development. Prospective prediction of human PK was performed by incorporating in vitro binding affinity differences between species for varying levels of CD33 target expression. Additionally, this approach was used to predict human PK of other previously tested anti-CD33 molecules with published clinical data. The findings showed that, for a cytotoxic ADC with non-linear PK and limited preclinical PK data, incorporating RO in the PK model and using data from the corresponding unconjugated antibody at higher doses allowed the identification of parameters to characterize monkey PK and enabled human PK predictions.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates as Cancer Therapeutics: Past, Present, and Future

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an innovative therapeutic approach that provides novel treatment options and hope for patients with cancer. By coupling monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to cytotoxic small-molecule payloads with a plasma-stable linker, ADCs offer the potential for increased drug specificity and fewer off-target effects than systemic chemotherapy. As evidence for the potential of these therapies, many new ADCs are in various stages of clinical development. Because their structure poses unique challenges to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization, it is critical to recognize the differences between ADCs and conventional chemotherapy in the design of ADC clinical development strategies. Although some properties may be determined mainly by either the mAb or the small-molecule portion, the behavior of these agents is not always predictable. Furthermore, because the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of ADCs are influenced by all 3 of its components (mAb, linker, and payload), it is important to characterize the intact molecule, any target-mediated catabolic clearance of the mAb, and the ADME properties of the small-molecule payload. Here we describe key issues in the clinical development of ADCs, including considerations for designing first-in-human studies for ADCs. We discuss some difficulties of ADC pharmacokinetic characterization and current approaches to overcoming these challenges. Finally, we consider all aspects of clinical pharmacology assessment required during drug development, using examples from the literature to illustrate the discussion.

Quantitative translational modeling to facilitate preclinical to clinical efficacy & toxicity translation in oncology

Significant scientific advances in biomedical research have expanded our knowledge of the molecular basis of carcinogenesis, mechanisms of cancer growth, and the importance of the cancer immunity cycle. However, despite scientific advances in the understanding of cancer biology, the success rate of oncology drug development remains the lowest among all therapeutic areas. In this review, some of the key translational drug development objectives in oncology will be outlined. The literature evidence of how mathematical modeling could be used to build a unifying framework to answer these questions will be summarized with recommendations on the strategies for building such a mathematical framework to facilitate the prediction of clinical efficacy and toxicity of investigational antineoplastic agents. Together, the literature evidence suggests that a rigorous and unifying preclinical to clinical translational framework based on mathematical models is extremely valuable for making go/no-go decisions in preclinical development, and for planning early clinical studies.

Measurement and Mathematical Characterization of Cell-Level Pharmacokinetics of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Case Study with Trastuzumab-vc-MMAE

The main objective of this work was to understand and mathematically characterize the cellular disposition of a tool antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), trastuzumab-valine-citrulline-monomethyl auristatin E (T-vc-MMAE). Toward this goal, three different analytical methods were developed to measure the concentrations of different ADC-related analytes in the media and cell lysate. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed to quantify unconjugated drug (i.e., MMAE) concentrations, a forced deconjugation method was developed to quantify total drug concentrations, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method was developed to quantify total antibody (i.e., trastuzumab) concentrations. Cellular disposition studies were conducted in low-HER2-(GFP-MCF7) and high-HER2-expressing (N87) cell lines, following continuous or 2-hour exposure to MMAE and T-vc-MMAE. Similar intracellular accumulation of MMAE was observed between two cell lines following incubation with plain MMAE. However, when incubated with T-vc-MMAE, much higher intracellular exposures of unconjugated drug, total drug, and total antibody were observed in N87 cells compared with GFP-MCF7 cells. A novel single-cell disposition model was developed to simultaneously characterize in vitro pharmacokinetics of all three analytes of the ADC in the media and cellular space. The model was able to characterize all the data well and provided robust estimates of MMAE influx rate, MMAE efflux rate, and intracellular degradation rate for T-vc-MMAE. ADC internalization and degradation rates, HER2 expression, and MMAE efflux rate were found to be the key parameters responsible for intracellular exposure to MMAE, on the basis of a global sensitivity analysis. The single-cell pharmacokinetics model for ADCs presented here is expected to provide a better framework for characterizing bystander effect of ADCs.

QSP Toolbox: Computational Implementation of Integrated Workflow Components for Deploying Multi-Scale Mechanistic Models

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling has become increasingly important in pharmaceutical research and development, and is a powerful tool to gain mechanistic insights into the complex dynamics of biological systems in response to drug treatment. However, even once a suitable mathematical framework to describe the pathophysiology and mechanisms of interest is established, final model calibration and the exploration of variability can be challenging and time consuming. QSP models are often formulated as multi-scale, multi-compartment nonlinear systems of ordinary differential equations. Commonly accepted modeling strategies, workflows, and tools have promise to greatly improve the efficiency of QSP methods and improve productivity. In this paper, we present the QSP Toolbox, a set of functions, structure array conventions, and class definitions that computationally implement critical elements of QSP workflows including data integration, model calibration, and variability exploration. We present the application of the toolbox to an ordinary differential equations-based model for antibody drug conjugates. As opposed to a single stepwise reference model calibration, the toolbox also facilitates simultaneous parameter optimization and variation across multiple in vitro, in vivo, and clinical assays to more comprehensively generate alternate mechanistic hypotheses that are in quantitative agreement with available data. The toolbox also includes scripts for developing and applying virtual populations to mechanistic exploration of biomarkers and efficacy. We anticipate that the QSP Toolbox will be a useful resource that will facilitate implementation, evaluation, and sharing of new methodologies in a common framework that will greatly benefit the community.

Application of a PK-PD Modeling and Simulation-Based Strategy for Clinical Translation of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: a Case Study with Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1)

Successful clinical translation of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) can be challenging due to complex pharmacokinetics and differences between preclinical and clinical tumors. To facilitate this translation, we have developed a general pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling and simulation (M&S)-based strategy for ADCs. Here we present the validation of this strategy using T-DM1 as a case study. A previously developed preclinical tumor disposition model for T-DM1 (Singh and Shah, AAPSJ. 2015; 18(4):861-875) was used to develop a PK-PD model that can characterize in vivo efficacy of T-DM1 in preclinical tumor models. The preclinical data was used to estimate the efficacy parameters for T-DM1. Human PK of T-DM1 was a priori predicted using allometric scaling of monkey PK parameters. The predicted human PK, preclinically estimated efficacy parameters, and clinically observed volume and growth parameters for breast cancer were combined to develop a translated clinical PK-PD model for T-DM1. Clinical trial simulations were performed using the translated PK-PD model to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORRs) for T-DM1. The model simulated PFS rates for HER2 1+ and 3+ populations were comparable to the rates observed in three different clinical trials. The model predicted only a modest improvement in ORR with an increase in clinically approved dose of T-DM1. However, the model suggested that a fractionated dosing regimen (e.g., front loading) may provide an improvement in the efficacy. In general, the PK-PD M&S-based strategy presented here is capable of a priori predicting the clinical efficacy of ADCs, and this strategy has been now retrospectively validated for all clinically approved ADCs.

Quantitative characterization of in vitro bystander effect of antibody-drug conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are designed to target antigen expressing (Ag+) cells in a tumor. Once processed by the Ag+ cells, ADCs can release cytotoxic drug molecules that can diffuse out of Ag+ cells into the neighboring antigen-negative (Ag-) cells to induce their cytotoxicity. This additional efficacy of ADCs on Ag- cells in the presence of Ag+ cells is known as the 'bystander effect'. Although the importance of this phenomena is widely acknowledged for effective killing of a heterogeneous tumor, the rate and extent of the bystander killing in a heterogeneous system is not quantitatively understood yet. Thus, the objectives of this manuscript were to: (1) synthesize and characterize a tool ADC Trastuzumab-vc-MMAE that is capable of exhibiting bystander effect, (2) quantify the time course of the bystander effect for the tool ADC using in vitro co-culture systems created using mixture of various HER2-expressing cell lines, and (3) develop a pharmacodynamic (PD) model that is capable of characterizing the bystander effect of ADCs. Co-culture studies conducted using GFP labelled MCF7 cells as Ag- cells and N87, BT474, and SKBR3 as Ag+ cells revealed that the bystander effect of ADC increases with increasing fraction of Ag+ cells in a co-culture system, and with increased expression level of target on Ag+ cells. A notable lag time after ADC incubation was also observed prior to significant bystander killing of Ag- cells. Based on our results we hypothesize that there may be other determinants apart from the antigen expression level that can also influence the ability of Ag+ cells to demonstrate the bystander effect in a co-culture system. The co-culture analysis also suggested that the bystander effect of the ADC can dissipate over the period of time as the population of Ag+ cells declines. A novel PD model was developed to mathematically characterize the bystander effect of ADCs by combining two different cell distribution models to represent the population of Ag+ and Ag- cells in a co-culture system. This PD model can be integrated with the systems PK model for ADCs in the future to generate a quantitative framework that is capable of supporting the discovery and development of novel ADCs with optimal bystander killing capabilities.