Value of Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT in Patients With MEN1 at Various Stages of Their Disease

The lesion detection rate of Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/MR in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study was to determine the usefulness of Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/MR in the identification of tumours in individuals with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1).

METHODS

In this retrospective investigation, five individuals who had tested positive for a hereditary MEN1 variant underwent Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/MR between May 2020 and January 2023. Several types of tumours associated with MEN1 were studied. MEN1-related tumours included pituitary, parathyroid, gastroenteropancreatic, and adrenal. The rates of lesion identification between MRI, Ga-68 DOTATATE PET, and Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/MRI were examined. The maximum and mean standard uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) were evaluated in carefully delineated volumes of interest (VOI) for the relevant tumours.

RESULTS

Of the 24 primary lesions, 14 were identified by Ga-68 DOTATATE PET, 18 by MRI, and 20 by Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/MRI. Two pituitary tumours were detected by all three techniques. All parathyroid tumours that were not detected by Ga-68 DOTATATE PET and MRI were found by Tc-99m MIBI SPECT/CT or/and EUS. Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/MR detected more gastroenteropancreatic lesions. All adrenal tumours not identified by Ga-68 DOTATATE PET were found by MRI or CT. The median SUVmax for lesions identified on Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/MRI was 18.4 (range, 3.8-85.2), and the median SUVmean was 12.0 (range, 2.3-49.8).

CONCLUSION

The combination of Ga-68 DOTATATE PET and MRI demonstrated a higher detection rate and may be more useful in the work-up of MEN1 providing a panoramic view of MEN1-related lesions. To increase the identification of MEN1-associated neuroendocrine lesions in the parathyroid gland, approaches other than Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/MRI should be used.

Beyond MEN1, when to think about MEN4? Retrospective study on 5600 patients in the French population & literature review

CONTEXT

Germline CDKN1B variants predispose patients to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4), a rare MEN1-like syndrome, with <100 reported cases since its discovery in 2006. Although CDKN1B mutations are frequently suggested to explain cases of genetically-negative MEN1, the prevalence and phenotype of MEN4 patients is poorly known, and genetic counseling is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of MEN4 in MEN1-suspected patients and characterize the phenotype of MEN4 patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational nationwide study. Narrative review of literature and variant class reassessment.

PATIENTS

We included all adult patients with class 3/4/5 CDKN1B variants identified by the laboratories from the French TENGEN network between 2015 and 2022 through germline genetic testing for MEN1 suspicion. After class reassessment, we compared the phenotype of symptomatic patients with class 4/5 CDKN1B variants, i.e. with genetically-confirmed MEN4 diagnosis, in our series and in literature with 66 matched MEN1 patients from the UMD-MEN1 database.

RESULTS

From 5600 MEN1-suspected patients analyzed, four patients with class 4/5 CDKN1B variant were found (0.07%). They presented with multiple duodenal NET, PHPT and adrenal nodule, isolated PHPT, PHPT and pNET. We listed 29 patients with CDKN1B class 4/5 variants from literature. Compared to matched MEN1 patients, MEN4 patients presented lower NET incidence and older age at PHPT diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of MEN4 is low. PHPT and PA represent the main associated lesions, NETs are rare. Our results suggest a milder and later phenotype than in MEN1. Our observations will help to improve genetic counseling and management of MEN4 families.

Imaging surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: Ten years of experience with somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography

Guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) recommend intensive imaging surveillance without specifying a superior regimen, including the role of somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) with positron emission tomography (PET). The primary outcomes were to: (1) Assess change in treatment of duodenal-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (DP-NENs), bronchopulmonary NENs, and thymic tumors attributed to use of SRI PET/computed tomography (CT) and (2) estimate radiation from imaging and risk of cancer death attributed to imaging radiation. This was a retrospective single center study, including all MEN1 patients, who had had at least one SRI PET/CT. A total of 60 patients, median age 42 (range 21-54) years, median follow-up 6 (range 1-10) years were included. Of 470 cross sectional scans (MRI, CT, SRI PET/CT), 209 were SRI PET/CT. The additional information from SRI PET had implications in 1/14 surgical interventions and 2/12 medical interventions. The estimated median radiation dose per patient was 104 (range 51-468) mSv of which PET contributed with 13 (range 5-55) mSv and CT with 91 mSv (range 46-413 mSv), corresponding to an estimated increased median risk of cancer death of 0.5% during 6 years follow-up. SRI PET had a significant impact on 3/26 decisions to intervene in 60 MEN1 patients followed for a median of 6 years with SRI PET/CT as the most frequently used modality. The surveillance program showed a high radiation dose. Multi-modality imaging strategies designed to minimize radiation exposure should be considered. Based on our findings, SRI-PET combined with CT cannot be recommended for routine surveillance in MEN1 patients.

Status of Surveillance and Nonsurgical Therapy for Small Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) occur in < 1/100,000 patients and most are nonfunctioning (NF). Approximately 5% occur as part of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Anatomic and molecular imaging have a pivotal role in the diagnosis, staging and active surveillance. Surgery is generally recommended for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) >2 cm to prevent metastases. For tumors ≤2 cm, active surveillance is a viable alternative. Tumor size and grade are important factors to guide management. Assessment of death domain-associated protein 6/alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked and alternative lengthening of telomeres are promising novel prognostic markers. This review summarizes the status of surveillance and nonsurgical management for small NF-PNETs, including factors that can guide management.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms in the context of inherited tumor syndromes: a reappraisal focused on targeted therapies

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine neoplasms can occur as part of inherited disorders, usually in the form of well-differentiated, slow-growing tumors (NET). The main predisposing syndromes include: multiple endocrine neoplasias type 1 (MEN1), associated with a large spectrum of gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic NETs, and type 4 (MEN4), associated with a wide tumour spectrum similar to that of MEN1; von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL), tuberous sclerosis (TSC), and neurofibromatosis 1 (NF-1), associated with pancreatic NETs. In the present review, we propose a reappraisal of the genetic basis and clinical features of gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic NETs in the setting of inherited syndromes with a special focus on molecularly targeted therapies for these lesions.

METHODS

Literature search was systematically performed through online databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Scopus using multiple keywords' combinations up to June 2022.

RESULTS

Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) remain the mainstay of systemic treatment for NETs, and radiolabelled SSAs can be used for peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive NETs. Apart of these SSTR-targeted therapies, other targeted agents have been approved for NETs: the mTOR inhibitor everolimus for lung, gastroenteropatic and unknown origin NET, and sunitinib, an antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for pancreatic NET. Novel targeted therapies with other antiangiogenic agents and immunotherapies have been also under evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Major advances in the understanding of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of NET development in the context of inherited endocrine disorders have led to the recognition of molecular targetable alterations, providing a rationale for the implementation of treatments and development of novel targeted therapies.

Diagnosing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in daily practice

BACKGROUND

In multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) have a high prevalence and represent the main cause of death. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the currently used conventional pancreatic imaging techniques and the added value of fine needle aspirations (FNAs).

METHODS

Patients who had at least one imaging study were included from the population-based MEN1 database of the DutchMEN Study Group from 1990 to 2017. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), FNA, and surgical resection specimens were obtained. The first MRI, CT, or EUS was considered as the index test. For a comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus CT, patients with their index test taken between 2010 and 2017 were included. The reference standard consisted of surgical histopathology or radiological follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 413 patients (92.8% of the database) underwent 3,477 imaging studies. The number of imaging studies per patient increased, and a preference for MRI was observed in the last decade. Overall diagnostic accuracy was good with a positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.9% (95% confidence interval, 76.0-95.6) and 92.8% (89.4-95.1), respectively, for PanNET in the pancreatic head and 92.0% (85.3-96.0) and 85.3% (80.5-89.1), respectively, in the body/tail. For MRI, PPV and NPV for pancreatic head tumors were 100% (76.1-100) and 87.1% (76.3-93.6) and for CT, 60.0% (22.9-88.4) and 70.4% (51.3-84.3), respectively. For body/tail tumors, PPV and NPV were 91.3% (72.0-98.8) and 87.0% (75.3-93.9), respectively, for MRI and 100% (74.9-100) and 77.8% (54.3-91.5), respectively, for CT. Pathology confirmed a PanNET in 106 out of 110 (96.4%) resection specimens. FNA was performed on 34 lesions in 33 patients and was considered PanNET in 24 [all confirmed PanNET by histology (10) or follow-up (14)], normal/cyst/unrepresentative in 6 (all confirmed PanNET by follow-up), and adenocarcinoma in 4 (2 confirmed and 2 PanNET). Three patients, all older than 60 years, had a final diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

As the accuracy for diagnosing MEN1-related PanNET of MRI was higher than that of CT, MRI should be the preferred (non-invasive) imaging modality for PanNET screening/surveillance. The high diagnostic accuracy of pancreatic imaging and the sporadic occurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma question the need for routine (EUS-guided) FNA.