CV 205-502 treatment of hyperprolactinemia

How to manage intolerance to dopamine agonist in patients with prolactinoma

PURPOSE

Dopamine agonists (DA) are the gold-standard for prolactinoma and hyperprolactinemia treatment. Intolerance to DA leading to drug drop out occurs in 3 to 12% of cases. We provide here a review of published data about DA intolerance and present a case report concerning the use of intravaginal cabergoline.

METHODS

We review the literature on the definition, the pathogenesis, frequency and management of DA intolerance. In addition, the review provides strategies to enhance tolerability and avoid precocious clinical treatment withdrawal.

RESULTS

Cabergoline is often cited as the most tolerable DA and its side effects tend to ameliorate within days to weeks. Restarting the same drug at a lower dose or switching to another DA can be used in cases of intolerance. The vaginal route can be tried specifically if there are gastrointestinal side effects in the oral administration. Symptomatic treatment could be attempted, although mainly based on a strategy used in other diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to limited data, no guidelines have been developed for the management of intolerance in DA treatment. The most frequent management is to perform transsphenoidal surgery. Nevertheless, this manuscript provides data derived from published literature and expert opinion, suggesting new approaches to this clinical issue.

The efficacy and safety of quinagolide in hyperprolactinemia treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Three dopamine agonists [bromocriptine, cabergoline, and quinagolide (CV)] have been used for hyperprolactinemia treatment for decades. Several studies have reviewed the efficacy and safety of bromocriptine and cabergoline. However, no systematic review or meta-analysis has discussed the efficacy and safety of CV in hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma treatment.

METHODS

Five medical databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched up to 9 May 2022 to identify studies related to CV and hyperprolactinemia. A meta-analysis was implemented by using a forest plot, funnel plot, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and Egger's test via software R 4.0 and STATA 12.

RESULTS

A total of 1,211 studies were retrieved from the five medical databases, and 33 studies consisting of 827 patients were finally included in the analysis. The pooled proportions of patients with prolactin concentration normalization and tumor reduction (>50%) under CV treatment were 69% and 20%, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of 61%-76% and 15%-28%, respectively. The pooled proportion of adverse effects was 13%, with a 95% confidence interval of 11%-16%.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that CV is not less effective than cabergoline and bromocriptine in treating hyperprolactinemia, and the side effects were not significant. Hence, this drug could be considered an alternative first-line or rescue treatment in treating hyperprolactinemia in the future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022347750.

Hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas

Any process interfering with dopamine synthesis, its transport to the pituitary gland, or its action at the level of lactotroph dopamine receptors can cause hyperprolactinemia. As described in this article, considering the complexity of prolactin regulation, many factors could cause hyperprolactinemia, and hyperprolactinemia can have clinical effects not only on the reproductive axis. Once any drug effects are excluded, prolactinomas are the most common cause of hyperprolactinemia. The most frequent symptom is hypogonadism in both genders. Medical and surgical therapies generally have excellent results, and most prolactinomas are well controlled or even cured in some cases.

Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas

Prolactinomas account for approximately 40% of all pituitary adenomas and are an important cause of hypogonadism and infertility. The ultimate goal of therapy for prolactinomas is restoration or achievement of eugonadism through the normalization of hyperprolactinemia and control of tumor mass. Medical therapy with dopamine agonists is highly effective in the majority of cases and represents the mainstay of therapy. Recent data indicating successful withdrawal of these agents in a subset of patients challenge the previously held concept that medical therapy is a lifelong requirement. Complicated situations, such as those encountered in resistance to dopamine agonists, pregnancy, and giant or malignant prolactinomas, may require multimodal therapy involving surgery, radiotherapy, or both. Progress in elucidating the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of prolactinomas may enable future development of novel molecular therapies for treatment-resistant cases. This review provides a critical analysis of the efficacy and safety of the various modes of therapy available for the treatment of patients with prolactinomas with an emphasis on challenging situations, a discussion of the data regarding withdrawal of medical therapy, and a foreshadowing of novel approaches to therapy that may become available in the future.

Dopamine receptor agonists for treating prolactinomas

Prolactinomas are the most common hormone-secreting pituitary tumours and cause infertility and gonadal and sexual dysfunction in both sexes. The approach to prolactinomas has changed in the last 25 years thanks to the availability of dopaminergic drugs characterised by a potent prolactin-inhibitory effect, a tumour shrinking effect associated with a satisfactory tolerability. In more recent years, cabergoline 1-[(6-allelylergolin-8beta-yl)carbonyl]-1-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]-3-ethyl-urea an ergoline derivative with potent, selective and long-lasting inhibitory activity on prolactin release, has been used to suppress prolactin secretion in women with hyperprolactinaemia. Cabergoline was shown to be significantly more effective than bromocriptine in inducing a complete biochemical response and clinical efficacy and was better tolerated than bromocriptine in the majority of patients. Notable tumour shrinkage until tumour disappearance was observed during cabergoline treatment in most patients with macroprolactinoma and it was also proven effective in patients resistant to or with a poor response to bromocriptine. In view of the limited data on cabergoline-associated pregnancies and the long half-life of the drug, it is currently recommended that women hoping to become pregnant, once ovulatory cycles have been established, should discontinue cabergoline therapy 1 month before they intend to conceive. However, no data concerning negative effects on pregnancy or offspring have been reported. The great efficacy of this compound together with its excellent tolerability makes this drug the current treatment of choice for the majority of patients with hyperprolactinaemic disorders.

Medical management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas

Prolactinomas are a common cause of reproductive/sexual dysfunction. Once other causes of hyperprolactinemia have been excluded with a careful history and physical examination, routine chemistries, a pregnancy test and a TSH, imaging with MRI or CT will delineate the size and extent of the tumor. Medical therapy is the initial treatment of choice. When infertility is the primary indication for treatment, bromocriptine use has an extensive safety experience and is preferred. However, for other indications, cabergoline appears to be more efficacious and better tolerated. Transsphenoidal surgery remains an option, especially for patients with microadenomas, when medical therapy is ineffective.

Current management of prolactinomas

Prolactinomas constitute the largest group of pituitary adenomas in autopsy series. However, their relative incidence in recent surgical series is much less impressive since medical treatment with dopamine agonists is routinely employed, which in many cases leads to tumor shrinkage and normalization of prolactin levels. The clinical symptoms of hyperprolactinemia are menstrual dysfunction and galactorrhea in women and loss of libido and potency in men. Prolactinomas may present also as space occupying sellar mass lesions impinging on the adjacent structures like the pituitary gland, cavernous sinus and optic nerves. The standard primary treatment is medical by dopamine agonists. Prolactinomas are the prototype of tumors, the growth of which can be reliably and safely inhibited by specific drugs other than cytostatic chemotherapy. These unfortunately have side effects, like orthostatic hypotension, nausea and vomiting. The effects induced by dopamine agonists are suppressive but not tumoricidal. Thus, the therapeutic effect is only maintained as long as the drug is administered. Consequently. in most cases, treatment has to be continued life-long with a few exceptions, in whom normoprolactinemia persists even after discontinuation of dopamine agonists. Main indications of surgery in prolactinomas are intolerance of the medication, and tumors not responding to dopamine agonists. Occasionally, these may ultimately require radiation therapy. Remission rates in large series of surgically treated prolactinomas vary between 54% and 86%. In our consecutive series of 540 surgically treated prolactinomas, the normalization rate after transsphenoidal surgery basically depended on the preoperative prolactin levels, tumor size and extension. The remission rate of 82% in microprolactinomas with initial prolactin levels <200 ng/ml would even in small adenomas make one consider surgical treatment as an interesting alternative to long-term medical treatment.

Disorders of prolactin secretion

Prolactinomas are a common cause of reproductive/sexual dysfunction. Once other causes of hyperprolactinemia have been excluded with a careful history and physical examination, routine chemistries, and an assay for TSH, MR imaging, or CT will delineate the size and extent of the tumor. Medical therapy is the initial treatment of choice. When infertility is the primary indication for treatment, bromocriptine use has an extensive safety record and is preferred. For other indications, cabergoline seems to be more efficacious and better tolerated. Transsphenoidal surgery remains an option, especially for patients with microadenomas, when medical therapy is ineffective.

A randomized cross-over study comparing cabergoline and quinagolide in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic patients

Quinagolide (QUI) and cabergoline (CAB) are dopamine agonists recently introduced for the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. In the present study, these drugs have been compared in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. Twenty patients (18 females and 2 males) with hyperprolactinemia (8 with microprolactinomas, 6 with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and 6 with empty sella turcica syndrome) were treated with oral QUI (75 microg once daily) and CAB (0,5 mg twice weekly), in a randomized cross-over trial with placebo between both drugs. Each drug was administered for 12 weeks, separated by other 12 weeks with placebo. PRL levels decreased with both drugs at 2 or 4 weeks of starting the treatment, without differences between both drugs at weeks 4, 8 and 12. At week 12, normal PRL levels (<20 ng/ml) were attained in 90% patients with CAB and only in 75% patients with QUI (p<0.05). After discontinuation of treatment, significant increase in serum PRL was higher after QUI withdrawal than after CAB. Clinical efficacy of both treatments was similar in terms of improvement amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, galactorrhea, and impotence. All patients completed both cycles of treatment, and the most frequent side-effects were nausea, headache and dizziness, without significant differences between CAB (30%) and QUI (55%). Our study indicates that, at the doses employed here, CAB showed a high percentage of patients with normal PRL at the end of treatment and long-lasting efficacy in the levels of PRL. Clinical response and side-effects were similar in both drugs.

New medical treatment for acromegaly

The available somatostatin analogs for subcutaneous administration lower growth hormone (GH) levels in more than 90% of patients and Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels in up to 60%. They are also capable of reducing tumor size in up to 50%. Recently long-acting somatostatin analogs were introduced. The use of these application forms can result in normalization of IGF-1 in 60% of patients after 1 year and in 75% after 3 years. The development of selective analogs for the somatostatin receptor subtype-5 potentially will enhance the potency and the spectrum of the medical treatment of acromegaly with somatostatin analogs. The new generation of dopaminergic drugs also form a potentially effective and well tolerated therapy that should be considered in the management of those acromegalic patients, which have relative low serum IGF-I concentrations, along with high serum prolactine levels. Finally, growth hormone receptor (GHR) antagonists are under development for the use in humans. Preliminary results look promising, when biochemical parameters are concerned. Interim analysis of a phase 3 study with B2036-PEG in 38 patients does show that normalization of IGF-I concentrations is reached in at least 92% of the treated patients.

Medical treatment of prolactinomas

Prolactinomas are a common cause of reproductive and sexual dysfunction. Once other causes of hyperprolactinemia have been excluded with a careful history, physical examination, routine chemistries, and a TSH, MR imaging or computerized tomography will delineate the size and extent of the tumor. Medical therapy is the initial treatment of choice. When infertility is the primary indication for treatment, bromocriptine use has an extensive safety experience and is preferred. For other indications, however, cabergoline appears to be more efficacious and better tolerated. Transsphenoidal surgery remains an option, especially for patients with microadenomas, when medical therapy is ineffective.

Diagnosis and drug therapy of prolactinoma

A prolactin-secreting pituitary tumour is the most frequent cause of hyperprolactinaemia that commonly occurs in clinical practice. Prolactinomas occur more frequently in women than in men and may differ in size, invasive growth and secretory activity. At presentation, macroadenomas are more frequently diagnosed in men. Specific immunohistochemical stains are necessary to prove the presence of prolactin in the tumour cells. The main investigations in the diagnosis of a prolactin-secreting adenoma are hormonal and radiological. As prolactin is a pulsatile hormone, it is a general rule to obtain several blood samples by taking a single sample on 3 separate days or 3 sequential samples (every 30 minutes) in restful conditions. Prolactin levels of 100 to 200 micrograms/L are commonly considered diagnostic for the presence of a prolactinoma; however, prolactinoma cannot be excluded in the presence of lower levels, and prolactin levels > 100 micrograms/L are present in some patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia. Several dynamic function tests have been proposed to differentiate idiopathic from tumorous hyperprolactinaemia. Although they could be used for group discrimination, these tests cannot be used for individual patients. To differentiate between a prolactinoma and a pseudoprolactinoma, thyrotrophin response to a dopamine receptor antagonist may be used, as only prolactinomas may have an increased response. A short course of dopaminergic drugs may also be of some help, as in macroprolactinomas only a shrinkage may be observed. After hyperprolactinaemia is confirmed, imaging with computerised tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are necessary to define the presence of a lesion compatible with a pituitary tumour. There is now a general agreement that medical therapy is of first choice in patients with prolactinomas. Bromocriptine, the most common drug used in this condition, is a semisynthetic ergot alkaloid that directly stimulates specific pituitary cell membrane dopamine D2 receptors and inhibits prolactin synthesis and secretion. In most patients, a reduction or normalisation of prolactin levels is usually observed, together with the disappearance or improvement of clinical symptoms. The sensitivity to bromocriptine is variable and patients may need different dose of the drug. Bromocriptine is also able to shrink the tumour in most patients; however, a few reports of disease progression during therapy have been described. The need for close follow-up, including prolactin levels and CT or MRI studies, is therefore emphasised. Bromocriptine is conventionally given in 2 or 3 daily doses; however, a single evening dose has been shown to be equally effective. Bromocriptine is usually well tolerated by the majority of patients; some adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, postural hypotension) may be initially present, but they usually wear off in time. To prevent such adverse effects it is advisable to start treatment with a low dose during the evening meal and gradually increase the dose over days or weeks. A few patients are unable to tolerate oral bromocriptine, so different formulations of bromocriptine or alternative dopamine agonist drugs (lisuride, terguride, metergoline, dihydroergocryptine, quinagolide, cabergoline, pergolide) have been proposed. Of particular clinical relevance because of their good tolerability and sustained activity are cabergoline and quinagolide. Particular attention should be paid to pregnancy in prolactinoma patients, as tumour enlargement has been reported. As the risk for this occurrence is low in patients with microprolactinoma, there is a general agreement that the drug can be stopped once pregnancy is diagnosed. In patients with macroprolactinoma the risk of tumour enlargement is higher. Therefore, primary therapy with bromocriptine until the tumour has shrank is suggested before pregnancy is attempted. Bromocriptine should be stopped as soon as pregnancy is confirmed, but re

Positive response to compound CV 205-502 in hyperprolactinemic patients resistant to or intolerant of bromocriptine

The clinical effects of CV 205-502, a potent and non-ergot-derived dopamine agonist, were investigated in 24 selected patients with hyperprolactinemia previously treated with standard oral bromocriptine, the slow-release oral form of bromocriptine (BRC-SRO) and/or the long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine (BRC-LAR); 14 were chosen because of their resistance to treatment and ten because they were intolerant of the different forms of bromocriptine. A macroprolactinoma was present in seven patients and a microprolactinoma in ten, whereas seven had no radiological images of a pituitary tumor and were classified as having non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. All the 24 patients were treated with CV 205-502 at a daily dose of 0.075-0.6 mg for 3-12 months. All the patients had gonadal dysfunction and galactorrhea. Basal serum prolactin values ranged from 70 to 1677 ng/ml. CV 205-502 was effective in 11 of the 14 patients resistant bromocriptine, BRC-SRO and BRC-LAR; serum prolactin levels became normal within 6 months and a tumor shrinkage was obtained in five of the seven macroprolactinomas. In general, the drug was effective and well tolerated. Only three patients (two resistant and one intolerant) manifested nausea, vomiting and postural hypotension. In conclusion, this study shows that CV 205-502 is effective in bromocriptine-resistant hyperprolactinemic patients. Furthermore, CV 205-502 has insignificant and tolerable side-effects in patients intolerant of bromocriptine. CV 205-502 can, therefore, be considered a useful and effective drug, and an interesting therapeutic alternative to the ergot-derived dopamine-agonist drugs in use today.

Acute overdose of a new dopamine agonist, CV 205-502

CV 205-502 is a new dopamine agonist used for hyperprolactinaemia. We report a case of acute overdose (one month treatment, i.e. 2.25 mg) in a 25-year-old male patient. Clinical symptoms were restricted to nausea and mild hypotension. Treatment consisting of ipeca cuanha, charcoal and intravenous fluids allowed a rapid, successful outcome. This case illustrates the particular features of CV 205-502 intoxication when compared to other dopamine agonists, pointing out the tolerance of the drug which can be considered for wider indications and safer prescriptions.

CV 205-502 in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states

CV 205-502 (octahydrobenzol[g]quinoline), a non-ergot dopamine agonist drug, was administered to 40 patients with hyperprolactinemic syndrome: 16 patients with macroprolactinoma, 14 with microprolactinoma and 10 with non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Twenty-four out of 40 patients had previously been treated by surgery and/or bromocriptine, with variable results. All had gonadal dysfunction and 22 patients had galactorrhea. Eight patients with macroprolactinoma had defects of the visual field. Pre-treatment serum PRL levels ranged from 60 to 2050 micrograms/l. The daily dose of CV 205-502 used in this trial ranged from 0.075 to 0.600 mg. After 6-12 months of treatment, serum PRL level decreased in all the patients reaching normoprolactinemia in 31 of them (77.5%) who demonstrated restoration of menses and disappearance of galactorrhea. The remaining nine patients (22.5%) had only a decrease of PRL levels without reaching normoprolactinemia and without any clinical effect. In 12 out of 16 patients with macroprolactinoma not previously surgically treated, a significant tumor shrinkage was shown by means of Computed Tomography and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The disappearance of visual defects was obtained in four out of eight patients. CV 205-502 was tolerated satisfactorily: mild side-effects occurred in four patients in the first week of treatment and spontaneously disappeared, whereas six patients (15%) needed to withdraw the therapy after 6 months because of side-effects. In conclusion CV 205-502 is a potent and well-tolerated drug in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states and is an effective alternative to other dopamine agonists in use today.

A cross-over study with the two novel dopaminergic drugs cabergoline and quinagolide in hyperprolactinemic patients

Cabergoline and quinagolide, two new dopamine agonist drugs with long-lasting activity, are currently under investigation for the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. At present, studies comparing these drugs for tolerability and efficacy in the same patients are lacking. It was our aim to make such a comparison in an open randomized cross-over trial. Cabergoline (0.5 mg twice weekly) and quinagolide (75 micrograms once daily) were given orally. Each drug was administered for 12 weeks. Treatment with the second drug was started after the recurrence of hyperprolactinemia. Twelve women with hyperprolactinemia due to idiopathic disease (n = 6), microprolactinoma (n = 5) or postsurgical empty sella (n = 1) were evaluated. Six women were amenorrheic and 6 were oligomenorrheic. Ten had spontaneous or provoked galactorrhea. Baseline characteristics (age, clinical signs and PRL levels) of patients initially allocated to the two treatment groups were similar. Nine patients completed both treatment cycles and PRL levels were lower under cabergoline (10.7 +/- 3.7 micrograms/L) than under quinagolide (25.0 +/- 7.7 micrograms/L; p < 0.05). One patient discontinued cabergoline because of dryness of the eyes after having completed the quinagolide cycle and 2 patients initially treated with cabergoline discontinued quinagolide because of gastrointestinal symptoms. After completion of the first treatment cycle, the time of recurrence of hyperprolactinemia was significantly longer after cabergoline (14 +/- 7 weeks) than after quinagolide (5 +/- 1 weeks; p < 0.05). At week 12, normal PRL levels (< 20 micrograms/L) were observed in 10 and 6 women during cabergoline and quinagolide, respectively. Only one case was resistant to both drugs. The clinical effects of the two treatments were similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The efficacy and tolerability of long-term cabergoline therapy in hyperprolactinaemic disorders: an open, uncontrolled, multicentre study. European Multicentre Cabergoline Study Group

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the efficacy and safety of the new, long-acting dopamine agonist drug cabergoline during long-term therapy of hyperprolactinaemia.

DESIGN

Open, prospective, multicentre study.

PATIENTS

One hundred and sixty-two females with either a microprolactinoma (n = 100), idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia (n = 54), empty sella syndrome (n = 7) or residual hyperprolactinaemia after surgery for a macroprolactinoma (n = 1). All had previously been treated with cabergoline or placebo for 4 weeks as part of a dose-finding study.

MEASUREMENTS

Menstrual pattern, adverse symptoms, blood pressure and pulse, serum PRL, blood count, liver and renal function were assessed after one month and subsequently at two-monthly intervals.

RESULTS

Treatment was started at doses of 0.25 mg (n = 3), 0.5 mg (n = 8), 1 mg (n = 150) or 2 mg (n = 1) per week, given either as a single weekly dose (n = 8) or divided into twice-weekly doses (n = 154), and was continued for at least 49 weeks in 123 patients. Final treatment doses ranged from 0.25 mg fortnightly to 2 mg twice weekly: most patients finished the study taking 0.5 mg once (n = 31) or twice (n = 77) weekly. Stable normalization of PRL levels was achieved in 138 subjects (85%), in 129 of whom the effective dose was < 1 mg per week. In the subset of 114 patients completing 49 weeks of therapy and having dose adjustments according to the protocol, the biochemical success rate was 92%. Fifty-nine of the 65 previously amenorrhoeic women (91%) and 44 of the 49 (90%) who were previously oligomenorrhoeic resumed regular menses and/or became pregnant during the study. Adverse events were reported in 64 patients (39.5%). In 84% of cases with adverse events, the symptoms were of mild or moderate severity and most occurred during the first few weeks of therapy; five patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of poor tolerance. The most frequent symptoms were dizziness (13% of patients), headache (13%), nausea (10%) and weakness and/or fatigue (10%). Of 27 patients who had previously been poorly tolerant of other dopamine agonists, 17 (63%) did not experience any side-effects and only one was intolerant of cabergoline. No adverse haematological or biochemical effects were detected except for a slight downward trend in haemoglobin which may have been related to the resumption of regular menses in previously amenorrhoeic or oligomenorrhoeic women. A mild hypotensive effect was observed, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures falling by 5 and 4 mmHg respectively during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide evidence for the long-term effectiveness and safety of cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia. Its ability to normalize PRL and restore gonadal function compares favourably with reported data on reference compounds while its tolerability profile and simple administration schedule offer potential advantages in terms of patient acceptability.

Dopaminergic resistance in a case of invasive macroprolactinoma

Invasive prolactinoma is a relatively infrequent variety of macroprolactinoma characterized by a fast and aggressive growth, with infiltration to adjacent structures, and whose management is frequently difficult. We present the case of a fatal invasive macroprolactinoma in whom resistance to different dopaminergic drugs developed.

Prolactin bioassay and hyperprolactinemia

The Nb2 rat lymphoma bioassay (BA) for prolactin (PRL) was performed in 26 subjects with hyperprolactinemia, 17 of whom had radiologic evidence of a pituitary adenoma. All subjects were treated with the long acting dopamine agonist CV 205-502. The radioimmunoassay (RIA) PRL significantly decreased with treatment but the BA/RIA PRL remained essentially the same, indicating that the relative bioactivity was unaffected.

CV 205-502 treatment of macroprolactinomas

CV 205-502, a benzoquinoline, is a new nonergot dopamine agonist compound which has been shown to be effective in lowering PRL levels in normal volunteers and in hyperprolactinemic women. Seven patients (4 men and 3 women) presenting with hyperprolactinemia due to macroprolactinoma were treated with CV 205-502 given as a single daily dose at bedtime for up to 12 months. Six patients presented with impaired gonadal function and 2 with galactorrhea. All patients but one had previously been treated with bromocriptine and 4 had undergone pituitary surgery (3 with complementary radiotherapy). Six patients responded within a few weeks to CV 205-502 treatment, PRL levels being normalized (4 patients, 0.075 to 0.150 mg/day) or significantly reduced to restore normal gonadal function (2 patients, 0.225 mg/day). The seventh patient, who had previously been resistant to bromocriptine, also failed to respond to CV 205-502 treatment even after high doses (0.450 mg/day). Under CV 205-502 treatment, follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging revealed a reduction in tumor size of up to 52% of the initial volume in the "PRL-responders" whereas an increase in tumor size was observed in the "nonresponding" patient. No biological disturbance appeared during CV 205-502 treatment and the drug tolerance was very good, with mild side-effects being reported by only 2 patients. In conclusion, CV 205-502, given once daily, appears to be a safe and effective alternative to other dopamine agonists in the treatment of macroprolactinoma, by reducing hyperprolactinemia and tumor size. It was, however, of no benefit in the one patient whose macroprolactinoma had been resistant to bromocriptine.

CV 205-502, a new dopamine agonist, versus bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia

Forty-seven hyperprolactinaemic patients with serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations persistently above 1500 mU/l were treated with the new dopamine agonist CV 205-502 or bromocriptine in a prospective, randomized and double-blind fashion during a 24-week period. Two women had to be excluded because of poor compliance in the first month. Therefore 45 patients remained for evaluation. 81% of the patients in the CV 205-502 group and 70% of the patients in the bromocriptine group normalized their prolactin levels within the study period with a treatment dose as permitted in this protocol. In general serum prolactin normalized within 8 to 12 weeks of treatment. There were no differences between the two tested drugs regarding restoration of the menstrual cycle or disappearance of galactorrhoea. Both drugs gave rise to adverse reactions, especially during the initiation of therapy. However, the adverse reactions reported during CV 205-502 treatment were less severe and persistent than those attributed to bromocriptine. Patient acceptance of the new drug with regard to tolerability was judged by 90% of the women in that treatment group as very good or good, while 75% of those treated with bromocriptine evaluated its tolerability as very good or good. We conclude that CV 205-502 is highly effective in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia with concomitant restoration of gonadal function and prevention of galactorrhoea. The tolerability of the drug seems better than of bromocriptine and therefore this drug is of value in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemic patients.

Effect of the new dopaminergic agonist CV 205-502 on plasma prolactin levels and tumour size in bromocriptine-resistant prolactinomas

Bromocriptine is currently and successfully used for the treatment of pituitary prolactinomas. However, bromocriptine appears unable to normalize plasma prolactin levels in about 10% and to reduce tumour size in one-third of cases. The lack of normalization of plasma prolactin levels in spite of a daily dose of bromocriptine equal to or higher than 15 mg suggests a bromocriptine resistance. We compared the long-term effects of bromocriptine and CV 205-502 (a non-ergot derivative D2 dopamine agonist) on plasma prolactin levels and tumour size in seven bromocriptine-resistant prolactinomas. Bromocriptine reduced significantly (P less than 0.001) plasma prolactin levels (from 2307 +/- 518 to 568 +/- 279 micrograms/l) (conversion to Sl units: 1 microgram/l = 20 mU/l). Visual field defects observed in five patients improved in four. However, CT scan analysis showed a decrease in tumour size in only three patients. Except for transient and minor side-effects at the beginning of the treatment, CV 205-502 was well tolerated in five of seven patients. In the remaining two patients nausea and vertigo occurred with high dosages of CV 205-502 and it was necessary to reduce the daily dose. CV 205-502 lowered plasma prolactin to levels similar to those obtained after bromocriptine therapy in four cases. In the three remaining patients, CV 205-502 was more potent than bromocriptine as demonstrated by the further 90% reduction in plasma levels obtained in one case and by the normalization of plasma prolactin levels in the two other cases. One woman became pregnant during CV 205-502 treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Control of prolactin secretion

1. Prolactin is a 21,500 Dalton single-chain polypeptide hormone but may occur in 50 kDa and 150 kDa molecular variants. 2. These large PRL variants may be secreted predominantly; this condition is termed "macroprolactinemia". It is characterized by high immunological and normal biological serum levels of prolactin, and lack of clinical symptoms of hyperprolactinemia. 3. The information on PRL is encoded on chromosome 6. Transcription can be enhanced and suppressed by a variety of hormonal factors. 4. PRL is secreted in a pulsatile fashion; it displays a circadian rhythm (with a maximum during sleep) and is stimulated by some amino acids. PRL also responds to mechanical stimulation of the breast. 5. PRL rises during pregnancy, and maintainance of hyperprolactinemia (and, thereby, physiological infertility) is dependent on the frequency and duration of breast feedings. 6. Hypothalamic regulation of prolactin mainly involves tonic inhibition via portal dopamine. The physiological importance of various stimulating factors present in the hypothalamus is still incompletely understood. In particular, there is still no place for TRH in PRL physiology. 7. PRL is released in response to stress; this response may be mediated by opioids. The low-estrogen, low-gonadotropin amenorrhea of endurance-training women is not mediated by prolactin, however. 8. Estrogens stimulate PRL gene transcription via at least two independent mechanisms. There are many clinical examples of this estrogen effect on prolactin serum levels, and also on the growth of prolactinomas. 9. Mild hyperprolactinemia remains an enigma which cannot satisfactorily be resolved by biochemical or radiological testing. The border between "normal" and "elevated" prolactin is ill-defined. The possibility of macroprolactinemia complicates this matter even further. 10. The number of drugs which suppress prolactin by acting on pituitary D2 receptors, and which are useful in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia, continues to increase. In the field of ergot alkaloids, parenteral application appears to be a logical solution to the problem of the high first-pass effect; in addition, this form of treatment is frequently better tolerated than the oral route. 11. Prolactinoma development is presently being studied employing molecular biological techniques; the question of whether tumorigenesis can be attributed to specific defects of gene regulation remains to be answered.

Treatment of macroprolactinomas with a new non-ergot, long-acting dopaminergic drug, CV 205-502

Eleven patients with prolactin-producing pituitary adenomas were treated with the new non-ergot, long-acting dopamine agonist, CV 205-502, for a period of 2-18 months (mean 11 months). Tumour volumes ranged from 1.9 to 64 ml in seven patients who were newly diagnosed, and from 0.1 to 3.1 ml in four patients who had been treated for macroprolactinomas by oral bromocriptine or depot bromocriptine (Parlodel LAR). Plasma prolactin values ranged from 3.5 to 360 U/l before institution of CV 205-502 treatment in these 11 patients. The following observations were made: (1) plasma prolactin values fell dramatically in all patients, and values within the normal range were obtained in five patients at once-daily doses of CV 205-502 between 0.075 and 0.300 mg; (2) tumour size reduction was obtained in all patients with macroadenomas on pretreatment CT scans. Tumour reduction was associated with the development of a partial empty sella in five patients, and with visualization of the pituitary in six cases; (3) bitemporal hemianopia (five patients) disappeared in four patients and improved in one patient. Oculomotor palsy receded in one patient; (4) signs of anterior pituitary insufficiency improved or normalized in most cases affected; (5) mild nausea or dizziness during the first days of CV 205-502 treatment and/or during several days after a dose increase were observed in three patients. We conclude that CV 205-502 in a once daily dose is an effective and safe alternative in the long-term treatment of macroprolactinomas.

Dopaminergic treatments for hyperprolactinaemia

Hyperprolactinaemia is a frequent cause of anovulatory sterility, although spontaneous pregnancy may occur occasionally. Dopaminergic treatment is highly effective for the treatment of both idiopathic and tumoral hyperprolactinaemia. If the only cause of infertility is chronic anovulation due to hyperprolactinaemia, an 80% pregnancy rate can be anticipated. Because of these results, surgical treatment is still needed only rarely. Pregnancy, either spontaneous or drug-related, is usually uneventful for the mother and is not associated with any increase in abortion, twins or malformations. Pregnancy-related tumour growth occurs rarely and can be treated successfully with dopaminergic drugs. On the contrary, there is more frequently improvement after pregnancy of the biochemical and clinical disorders associated with hyperprolactinaemia.

[Treatment of prolactinoma]

Prolactinomas rank first in frequency among hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas, but their management remains controversial. The authors present a review of the literature concerning the various therapeutic methods used and their results. As regards microadenomas, opinions are divided since the results obtained with bromocriptine and with selective adenomectomy are about the same. As regards macroadenomas, surgery exposes to more frequent complications and above all to recurrences. The majority of authors is in favour of bromocriptine first followed, if necessary, by surgical excision. Pregnancy may accelerate the development of prolactinomas. This risk is minimal with microadenomas and more real with macroadenomas, requiring more radical treatment before pregnancy and close monitoring.

Effect of CV 205-502 in hyperprolactinaemic patients intolerant of bromocriptine

CV 205-502 (Sandoz), an octahydrobenzol [g]quinoline, is a long-acting dopamine agonist which inhibits prolactin secretion. We conducted a phase 2 clinical study in 10 hyperprolactinaemic women (nine of whom were previously intolerant of bromocriptine) in order to determine (1) the dose at which CV 205-502 exerted its prolactin-lowering effect; (2) the nature of adverse reactions associated with long-term therapy; and (3) whether patients who were intolerant of bromocriptine could tolerate CV 205-502. At first patients were randomized to take initial doses of either 0.02 or 0.05 mg daily at bedtime. Thereafter these doses of medication were gradually increased either to the point of normalizing serum prolactin (to 0.70 IU/l or 20 ng/ml) or to a maximum dose of 0.14 mg daily. The lower initial dose was ineffective and had to be increased in all patients. The higher initial dose (0.05 mg) normalized prolactin in three of five women within 24 h. During chronic administration of the final dose of CV 205-502 (mean 0.09 mg a day), serum prolactin decreased from a mean level of 9.19 +/- 4.9 (SEM) IU/l to a mean level of 1.55 +/- 0.49 IU/l (n = 10 patients). Prolactin was normalized in five patients. Two patients, one of whom had been previously unresponsive to bromocriptine, and another unresponsive to pergolide with regard to prolactin inhibition, were also unresponsive to CV 205-502. Nausea, the side-effect responsible for these patients' previous intolerance of bromocriptine, occurred in six of 10 patients taking CV 205-502 but was much less disabling and did not cause any of the patients to stop this medication. Only one patient taking CV 205-502 discontinued treatment because of adverse effects (light-headedness).