Impaired growth hormone (GH) response to pyridostigmine in type 1 diabetic patients with exaggerated GH-releasing hormone-stimulated GH secretion

Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission

PURPOSE

The 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

Fifty-six acromegaly experts from 16 countries reviewed and discussed current evidence focused on biochemical assays; criteria for diagnosis and the role of imaging, pathology, and clinical assessments; consequences of diagnostic delay; criteria for remission and recommendations for follow up; and the value of assessment and monitoring in defining disease progression, selecting appropriate treatments, and maximizing patient outcomes.

RESULTS

In a patient with typical acromegaly features, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I > 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis. Random growth hormone (GH) measured after overnight fasting may be useful for informing prognosis, but is not required for diagnosis. For patients with equivocal results, IGF-I measurements using the same validated assay can be repeated, and oral glucose tolerance testing might also be useful. Although biochemical remission is the primary assessment of treatment outcome, biochemical findings should be interpreted within the clinical context of acromegaly. Follow up assessments should consider biochemical evaluation of treatment effectiveness, imaging studies evaluating residual/recurrent adenoma mass, and clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly, its complications, and comorbidities. Referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology, or imaging findings at diagnosis, and for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

Consensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease.

Role of vitamin D in diabetic retinopathy: Pathophysiological and clinical aspects

Epidemiological data predict a dramatic increase in the prevalence of diabetes and of diabetic retinopathy (DR) - the most common complication of diabetes-for which however we do not have so far effective tools for prevention and treatment. Since hypovitaminosis D is very frequent in patients with diabetes and vitamin D (VD) has vascular protective properties, several studies have addressed the association of VD deficiency with DR and its severity and progression, whereas the effects of VD supplementation on its natural history are largely unknown. Here we review the available evidence that supports the possible protective role of VD in DR and suggests to determine the VD levels in DR patients calling for a definitive randomized clinical trial to ascertain whether VD supplementation could protect against DR.

Laboratory investigations in the diagnosis and follow-up of GH-related disorders

In addition to auxiological, clinical and metabolic features measurements of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) complement our tools in diagnosis and follow-up of GH-related disorders. While comparably robust during the pre-analytical phase, measurement and interpretation of concentrations of both hormones can be challenging due to analytical issues and biological confounders. Assay methods differ in terms of antibody specificity, interference from binding proteins, reference preparations and sensitivity. GH assays have different specificity towards different GH-isoforms (e.g. 20 kDa GH, placental GH) and interference from the GH antagonist Pegvisomant. The efficacy to prevent binding protein interference is most important in IGF-I assays. Methodological differences between assays require that reference intervals and diagnostic cut-offs are assay-specific. Among biological variables, pubertal development and age are most relevant for IGF-I, making detailed reference intervals mandatory for interpretation. GH has pulsatile secretion and short half-life. Its concentration is modified by acute factors such as stress, exercise and sleep, but also by intake of oral estrogens and anthropometric factors (e.g. BMI). Other GH dependent biomarkers such as free IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP 3) and acid labile subunit (ALS) have been proposed. Their concentrations largely mirror the information obtained through measurement of IGF-I, but their measurement can be helpful in particular situations. In this review, we describe the evolution of analytical methods to measure biomarkers of GH action, the impact of the methodological changes on laboratory results and the need to include biological variables in their interpretation. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):618-29.

Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly

Measurements of human growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth-factor I (IGF-I) are cornerstones in the diagnosis of acromegaly. Both hormones are also used as biochemical markers in the evaluation of disease activity during treatment. Management of acromegaly is particularly challenging in cases where discordant information is obtained from measurement of GH concentrations following oral glucose load and from measurement of IGF-I. While in some patients biological factors can explain the discrepancy, in many cases issues with the analytical methods seem to be responsible. Assays used by endocrine laboratories to determine concentrations of GH and IGF-I underwent significant changes during the last decades. While generally leading to more sensitive and reproducible methods, these changes also had considerable impact on absolute concentrations measured. This must be reflected by updated decision limits, cut-offs and reference intervals. Since different commercially available assays do not agree very well, method specific interpretation of GH and IGF-I concentrations is required. This complexity in the interpretation of hormone concentrations is not always appropriately reflected in laboratory reports, but also not in clinical guidelines reporting decision limits not related to a specific analytical method. The present review provides an overview about methodological and biological variables affecting the biochemical assessment of acromegaly in diagnosis and follow up.

Insulin and GH-IGF-I axis: endocrine pacer or endocrine disruptor?

Growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis may play a role in maintaining glucose homeostasis in synergism with insulin. IGF-1 can directly stimulate glucose transport into the muscle through either IGF-1 or insulin/IGF-1 hybrid receptors. In severely decompensated diabetes including diabetic ketoacidosis, plasma levels of IGF-1 are low and insulin delivery into the portal system is required to normalize IGF-1 synthesis and bioavailability. Normalization of serum IGF-1 correlated with the improvement of glucose homeostasis during insulin therapy providing evidence for the use of IGF-1 as biomarker of metabolic control in diabetes. Taking apart the inherent mitogenic discussion, diabetes treatment using insulins with high affinity for the IGF-1 receptor may act as an endocrine pacer exerting a cardioprotective effect by restoring the right level of IGF-1 in bloodstream and target tissues, whereas insulins with low affinity for the IGF-1 receptor may lack this positive effect. An excessive and indirect stimulation of IGF-1 receptor due to sustained and chronic hyperinsulinemia over the therapeutic level required to overtake acute/chronic insulin resistance may act as endocrine disruptor as it may possibly increase the cardiovascular risk in the short and medium term and mitogenic/proliferative action in the long term. In conclusion, normal IGF-1 may be hypothesized to be a good marker of appropriate insulin treatment of the subject with diabetes and may integrate and make more robust the message coming from HbA1c in terms of prediction of cardiovascular risk.

Insulin-like growth factors and kidney disease

Insulin-like growth factors (IGF-1 and IGF-2) are necessary for normal growth and development. They are related structurally to proinsulin and promote cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival, as well as insulin-like metabolic effects, in most cell types and tissues. In particular, IGFs are important for normal pre- and postnatal kidney development. IGF-1 mediates many growth hormone actions, and both growth hormone excess and deficiency are associated with perturbed kidney function. IGFs affect renal hemodynamics both directly and indirectly by interacting with the renin-angiotensin system. In addition to the IGF ligands, the IGF system includes receptors for IGF-1, IGF-2/mannose-6-phosphate, and insulin, and a family of 6 high-affinity IGF-binding proteins that modulate IGF action. Disordered regulation of the IGF system has been implicated in a number of kidney diseases. IGF activity is enhanced in early diabetic nephropathy and polycystic kidneys, whereas IGF resistance is found in chronic kidney failure. IGFs have a potential role in enhancing stem cell repair of kidney injury. Most IGF actions are mediated by the tyrosine kinase IGF-1 receptor, and inhibitors recently have been developed. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal role of IGF-based therapies in kidney disease.

Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, and the kidney: pathophysiological and clinical implications

Besides their growth-promoting properties, GH and IGF-1 regulate a broad spectrum of biological functions in several organs, including the kidney. This review focuses on the renal actions of GH and IGF-1, taking into account major advances in renal physiology and hormone biology made over the last 20 years, allowing us to move our understanding of GH/IGF-1 regulation of renal functions from a cellular to a molecular level. The main purpose of this review was to analyze how GH and IGF-1 regulate renal development, glomerular functions, and tubular handling of sodium, calcium, phosphate, and glucose. Whenever possible, the relative contributions, the nephronic topology, and the underlying molecular mechanisms of GH and IGF-1 actions were addressed. Beyond the physiological aspects of GH/IGF-1 action on the kidney, the review describes the impact of GH excess and deficiency on renal architecture and functions. It reports in particular new insights into the pathophysiological mechanism of body fluid retention and of changes in phospho-calcium metabolism in acromegaly as well as of the reciprocal changes in sodium, calcium, and phosphate homeostasis observed in GH deficiency. The second aim of this review was to analyze how the GH/IGF-1 axis contributes to major renal diseases such as diabetic nephropathy, renal failure, renal carcinoma, and polycystic renal disease. It summarizes the consequences of chronic renal failure and glucocorticoid therapy after renal transplantation on GH secretion and action and questions the interest of GH therapy in these conditions.

Growth hormone response to GHRH + GHRP-6 in type 2 diabetes during euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamp

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two different glucose levels on GH response to the combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in patients with type 2 diabetes. GH response to i.v. bolus of GHRH+GHRP-6 (100 mcg, each) was measured in 12 male patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age: 53.9+/-1.59 years; BMI: 25.58+/-0.39 kg/m(2); mean HbA(1c): 8.7+/-0.42%), during a euglycemic (mean glucose: 4.92+/-0.08 mmol) hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate of 100 mU/kg/h) and a hyperglycemic clamp (mean glucose: 12.19+/-0.11 mmol/l). There was no difference in basal GH levels between the hyperglycemic and euglycemic clamps (2.9+/-0.99 mU/l versus 1.48+/-0.44 mU/l; P>0.05). Peak GH response to GHRH+GHRP-6 during the hyperglycemic clamp was lower than in the englycemic clamp (112.45+/-14.45 mU/l versus 151.06+/-16.87 mU/l; P<0.05). Area under the GH curve was lower in the hyperglycemic than in the euglycemic clamp (6974.49+/-1001.95 mU/l/min versus 9560.75+/-1140.65 mU/l/min; P<0.05). It is concluded that hyperglycemia significantly reduces GH response to combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in normal weight patients with type 2 diabetes. It is suggested that ambient glucose levels should be taken into account during interpretation of GH response to combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Effects of long-term estrogen replacement therapy on growth hormone response to pyridostigmine in healthy postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

There is growing evidence that estrogen may protect against age-related cognitive decline and reduce the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) in healthy, postmenopausal women. The underlying biological basis for this is not known but may include preservation of cholinergic systems. Cholinergic dysfunction has been implicated in the aetiology of age-related memory impairment and AD. We studied the effect of prolonged use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on central cholinergic tone in healthy postmenopausal women.

METHOD

Growth hormone (GH) responses to oral pyridostigmine (120 mg) were measured over a 3 h period in thirty healthy postmenopausal women, 15 on long-term ERT and 15 ERT naïve.

RESULTS

GH release following pyridostigmine was significantly larger in ERT treated women than in ERT naïve women. In addition within the ERT treated group there was a significant positive correlation between duration of estrogen treatment and GH response.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term ERT can enhance cholinergic function in postmenopausal women and this may be related to duration of estrogen treatment. Modulation of central cholinergic function may be one mechanism by which long-term ERT could preserve cognitive function in healthy, postmenopausal women.

Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in experimental animals and the human

During the last decade, the GH axis has become the compelling focus of remarkably active and broad-ranging basic and clinical research. Molecular and genetic models, the discovery of human GHRH and its receptor, the cloning of the GHRP receptor, and the clinical availability of recombinant GH and IGF-I have allowed surprisingly rapid advances in our knowledge of the neuroregulation of the GH-IGF-I axis in many pathophysiological contexts. The complexity of the GHRH/somatostatin-GH-IGF-I axis thus commends itself to more formalized modeling (154, 155), since the multivalent feedback-control activities are difficult to assimilate fully on an intuitive scale. Understanding the dynamic neuroendocrine mechanisms that direct the pulsatile secretion of this fundamental growth-promoting and metabolic hormone remains a critical goal, the realization of which is challenged by the exponentially accumulating matrix of experimental and clinical data in this arena. To the above end, we review here the pathophysiology of the GHRH somatostatin-GH-IGF-I feedback axis consisting of corresponding key neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, and metabolic effectors, and their cloned receptors and signaling pathways. We propose that this system is best viewed as a multivalent feedback network that is exquisitely sensitive to an array of neuroregulators and environmental stressors and genetic restraints. Feedback and feedforward mechanisms acting within the intact somatotropic axis mediate homeostatic control throughout the human lifetime and are disrupted in disease. Novel effectors of the GH axis, such as GHRPs, also offer promise as investigative probes and possible therapeutic agents. Further understanding of the mechanisms of GH neuroregulation will likely allow development of progressively more specific molecular and clinical tools for the diagnosis and treatment of various conditions in which GH secretion is regulated abnormally. Thus, we predict that unexpected and enriching insights in the domain of the neuroendocrine pathophysiology of the GH axis are likely be achieved in the succeeding decades of basic and clinical research.

Growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing peptide-6 in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

In insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), inappropriate growth hormone (GH) responses to several stimuli, including GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), have been described. A decreased hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone is one of the most likely explanations for these findings. His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2 [GH-releasing peptide-6 [GHRP-6]] is a synthetic hexapeptide that stimulates GH release in vitro and in vivo. The mechanism of action of GHRP-6 is unknown, but it probably does not inhibit hypothalamic somatostatin secretion. Also, GHRH and GHRP-6 apparently activate different intracellular pathways to release GH. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a differential effect of IDDM on GHRP-6- and GHRH-induced GH secretion. Six patients with IDDM and seven control subjects were studied. Each subject received GHRP-6 (1 microgram/kg intravenously [IV]), GHRH (100 micrograms IV), and GHRP-6 + GHRH on 3 separate days. GH peak values (mean +/- SE in micrograms per liter) were similar in controls and diabetics after GHRH (22.5 +/- 7.8 v 24.0 +/- 9.7) and after GHRP-5 (20.5 +/- 5.3 v 24.4 +/- 6.3). The association of GHRP-6 and GHRH induced a significantly higher GH release than administration of the isolated peptides in both groups. The synergistic GH response to combined administration of GHRP-6 and GHRH was not different in controls (70.5 +/- 20.0) and diabetics (119.0 +/- 22.2). In summary, the effectiveness of GHRP-6 in IDDM could reinforce the evidence that this peptide probably does not release GH through a decrease in hypothalamic somatostatin secretion. Moreover, our data suggest that both GHRH and GHRP-6 releasing mechanisms are unaltered in IDDM.

Glutamate decarboxylase autoimmunity and growth hormone secretion in type I diabetes mellitus

Insulin-dependent (type I) diabetic patients are known to have an exaggerated growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), which is hypothesized to be due to a decrease in somatostatin tone. The aim of the study was to ascertain the influence of the presence and activity of the autoimmune process involving a key enzyme (glutamic acid decarboxylase [GAD]) in the synthetic pathway of a neurotransmitter regulating somatostatin secretion, ie, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), on the GH response to GHRH alone or combined with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, pyridostigmine (PD), in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. Twenty non-obese type I diabetic patients and 17 normal subjects underwent an intravenous (IV) injection of 100 micrograms GHRH(1-29)NH2. Twelve of 20 diabetic subjects and all of the control subjects also underwent a second experimental procedure, administration of 120 mg oral PD 60 minutes before IV injection of 100 micrograms GHRH. Diabetic subjects with serum GAD antibody (GADA) levels more than 3 U (n = 10) showed significantly higher serum GH levels after GHRH injection as compared both with diabetic patients with GADA less than 3 U (n = 10) and with normal controls, whether expressed as absolute or peak values. GH peaks after GHRH were significantly (rs = .46, P < .05) correlated with the level of GADA in the whole population of type I diabetic subjects studied. PD significantly enhanced the GH response to GHRH, in terms of both absolute and peak values, in patients without GADA (n = 6) and in normal subjects. On the contrary, PD failed to enhance the GH response to GHRH in diabetic patients with GADA (n = 6). Our findings suggest that autoimmunity may play a key role in determining the exaggerated GH response to GHRH in type I diabetes mellitus. The mechanism underlying this effect is hypothesized to be the production of antibodies to GAD, a key enzyme in the synthesis of GABA, and in turn a reduced GABAergic stimulatory tone on somatostatin production at the hypothalamic level.

Hypothalamic control of growth hormone (GH) secretion in type I diabetic men: effect of the combined administration of GH-releasing hormone and hexarelin, a novel GHRP-6 analog

Insulin dependent (type I) diabetic patients show abnormal growth hormone (GH) secretion. Hexarelin is an analog of GHRP-6 which releases GH in part via somatostatin inhibition. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of hexarelin and GHRH, administered either alone or in combination, on GH secretion in 10 type I diabetic and 7 normal men. All the subjects were administered: 1) human GHRH (1-29) NH2 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min; 2) hexarelin 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min; 3) hexarelin 100 micrograms + hGHRH 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min. In type I diabetic patients significantly greater GH responses to GHRH and hexarelin have been observed with normal subjects. Hexarelin caused a significantly (p < 0.05) greater GH response as compared to GHRH in both diabetic and control subjects. After the administration of hexarelin+GHRH, a significant increase in both GH absolute and peak levels as compared to hexarelin or GHRH alone was found in all the subjects. However, the GH responses to the combined stimuli were not significantly different in diabetics as compared to normals; moreover, the interaction of GHRH and hexarelin was synergistic in controls and additive in diabetics. We hypothesize that a reduction in the hypothalamic somatostatin inhibitory tone combined with increased pituitary GH production may be responsible for the pattern of the GH responses to hexarelin and GHRH observed in our type I diabetic patients.

Growth hormone responses to pyridostigmine in schizophrenia: evidence for cholinergic dysfunction

The hypothesis that increased central cholinergic neurotransmitter function may be present in schizophrenic illness and may underlie negative symptoms was tested using a neuroendocrine challenge approach. The cholinergic challenge used was the anticholinesterase pyridostigmine, thought to cause the release of growth hormone (GH) from the anterior pituitary by diminishing inhibitory somatostatin tone. Eleven patients, six neuroleptic-naive and five neuroleptic-free, satisfying DSM-III-R criteria for schizophrenia and 11 matched controls took part. Subjects received pyridostigmine (120 mg orally) and blood was sampled at 0, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min for GH estimation. Peak GH responses were significantly increased in the schizophrenic group compared to controls. There was no relationship between individual peak GH values and negative symptom ratings (Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms). Neither could a relationship be established between other aspects of psychopathology or dyskinesias and GH responses. An increased pyridostigmine/GH response is also found in affective disorders and could be related to nonspecific symptoms common to all these diagnostic groups. This study suggests that schizophrenia may be associated with increased cholinergic neurotransmitter function but the relationship between this cholinergic dysfunction and schizophrenia may involve psychopathology not specific to schizophrenia.

Effect of pyridostigmine on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in lean and obese type II Diabetic patients

A suppressed growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in both lean and overweight type II diabetics has been reported. Pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, elicits GH secretion when administered alone and enhances the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of PD on GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in both lean and obese type II diabetic patients. We studied 16 patients with type II diabetes mellitus (seven lean and nine obese). Eleven nondiabetic subjects (six lean and five obese) served as controls. Each subjects underwent treatment with (1) 120 mg PD orally or (2) 2 tablets of placebo orally, 60 minutes before intravenous (IV) injection of 100 micrograms GHRH-(1-29)NH2. We have found no significant differences in GH responses to GHRH between obese diabetics and obese controls. On the other hand, the absolute GH levels were significantly suppressed in lean type II diabetics compared with lean controls at 15 and 30 minutes after GHRH injection. Obese diabetic subjects had slightly but not significantly decreased GH responses to GHRH+PD compared with obese nondiabetic subjects (8.36 +/- 1.62 v 14.4 +/- 7.62 micrograms/L). Lean type II diabetics showed a blunted GH release after GHRH+PD compared with normal-weight healthy subjects (GH peaks, 15.77 +/- 2.17 v 40.88 +/- 6.17 micrograms/L, P < .05). PD enhanced significantly the GH response to GHRH in obese diabetics, obese controls, and non-obese controls (P < .05), but not in non-obese type II diabetics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Growth Hormone neuroregulation in diabetes mellitus

GH secretion is markedly altered in diabetic rats and humans. Diabetes in the rat, whether occurring spontaneously or after streptozotocin administration, results in depressed GH secretion. This defect is likely caused by an increase in hypothalamic somatostatin tone and decreased pituitary GH. The effects of diabetes in humans depend upon the etiology of the disease. In type-1 diabetes, GH secretion is increased and in type 2 it is decreased. Again, these changes are hypothesized to be due to opposite alterations in hypothalamic somatostatin. Current evidence suggests that GH hypersecretion in human type-1 diabetes may be relevant to important metabolic and angiopathic complications of the disease.

Variability in the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone alone or combined with pyridostigmine in type 1 diabetic patients

In man the GH response to GHRH is variable within and between subjects. Pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce the variability of the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects. The aim of this study was to assess the existence of either inter- or intraindividual variability in the GH response to GHRH in type 1 diabetic patients. Moreover, we investigated the effect of PD on such variability in the same patients. Seven (4 females-3 males) nonobese type 1 diabetic patients underwent two experiments performed in consecutive days according to a single-blind protocol: 1) 120 mg oral PD 60 min before iv injection of human (h) GHRH-(1-29) NH2, 100 micrograms in 2 ml of sterile water; 2) oral placebo 60 min before iv injection of 100 micrograms hGHRH. The two experiments were then repeated, following the same procedure, one and two weeks after the start of the study. The GH peaks after GHRH were variable within different subjects but also in the same subject on different occasions. However, the mean GH peak levels after GHRH in the three tests were not significantly different (14.2 +/- 3.5, 15.3 +/- 3, 16.5 +/- 6.4 micrograms/L, respectively), the coefficient of variation for each test was 65%, 51.8%, 102.4%, respectively (mean 73.1 +/- 15.1%). The GH response to GHRH was always significantly enhanced by PD administration: the mean GH peak levels in the three tests were 31.9 +/- 7.1, 44.8 +/- 10.4, 49.9 +/- 13.1 micrograms/L, respectively, without significant differences between tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Short term pirenzepine treatment is ineffective in suppressing 24-h growth hormone secretion in type 1 diabetes mellitus

Large doses of pirenzepine given at bedtime suppress nocturnal GH secretion and abolish dawn phenomenon. As GH suppression may be beneficial in diabetic subjects we have investigated the effect of routine doses of pirenzepine on GH secretion in 9 type 1 diabetics. In the acute study pirenzepine 20 mg i.v. administered 15 min before GHRH 80 micrograms i.v. completely inhibited GHRH-induced GH response and the peak GH values were reduced from 66.3 to 9.2 ng/ml, P < 0.005. In the chronic study pirenzepine was given in a daily dose of 75 or 150 mg for 4 days and GH was measured hourly during 24-h study before and on the fourth day of pirenzepine administration. GH secretion calculated as area under curve (AUC) was not affected by pirenzepine and the values of AUC were: 139 ng/ml per h (the control 24-h study) and 123 ng/ml per h (pirenzepine 75 mg) and 303 ng/ml per h (pirenzepine 150 mg). Mean plasma glucose was not changed by pirenzepine. GH secretion calculated as AUC and mean 24-h GH level did not correlate with metabolic control of diabetes assessed by HbA1. It is concluded that routine doses of pirenzepine do not suppress GH hypersecretion in type 1 diabetic subjects and therefore this agent does not seem suitable for the purpose of 24-h GH suppression in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Cholinergic control of growth hormone (GH) responses to GH-releasing hormone in insulin dependent diabetics: evidence for attenuated hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone and decreased GH autofeedback

OBJECTIVE

We have investigated the effects of cholinergic modulation with pirenzepine and pyridostigmine and of GH pretreatment on the subsequent GH response to a maximal stimulatory dose of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). We have also investigated the relationship between the differences in metabolic control and other parameters of disease state with the differences in GH responses in IDDM.

PATIENTS

Thirteen male subjects with IDDM and no clinical evidence of complications were selected based on HbA1 levels to provide a wide range of metabolic control. Seven normal subjects were also studied.

DESIGN

Twelve of the subjects with IDDM and six normal subjects received pirenzepine 200 mg and pyridostigmine 120 mg pretreatment 60 minutes and GH pretreatment 3 hours before an i.v. injection of GHRH (1-44) (80 micrograms) in random order. All subjects underwent a control study with GHRH alone.

MEASUREMENTS

Serum GH and plasma glucose were measured at regular intervals throughout the study. Fasting plasma glucose and HbA1 were measured before each study to provide measures of metabolic control.

RESULTS

Subjects with IDDM demonstrated exaggerated GH responses to GHRH compared to normals. Pirenzepine significantly reduced GH responses in both normal and diabetic subjects. However, the GH response to GHRH after pirenzepine was higher in subjects with IDDM (mean GH:IDDM vs normals; 8.1 +/- 1.3 vs 2.9 +/- 0.7 mU/l, P < 0.05). Pyridostigmine 120 mg significantly augmented the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects. In diabetic subjects, pyridostigmine failed to increase GH response to GHRH compared to GHRH alone (mean GH: pyridostigmine vs control: 75.7 +/- 12.6 vs 38.9 +/- 5.4 mU/l, P = NS). GH responses to GHRH after pyridostigmine pretreatment in both normal and diabetic subjects did not differ and the GH response to GHRH after pyridostigmine in normal subjects did not differ from the GH response to GHRH alone in diabetic subjects. In normal subjects, GH pretreatment significantly reduced subsequent GH responsiveness to GHRH (delta peak GH 26.4 +/- 5.2 vs 7.7 +/- 5.4 mU/l, P < 0.04). In contrast, GH pretreatment did not cause any significant reduction in GH responsiveness to GHRH in diabetics (delta peak GH 53.6 +/- 9.7 vs 33.4 +/- 11 mU/l, P = NS). No significant correlation was demonstrated between measures of diabetic control and the responses to GHRH alone or after cholinergic modulation and GH pretreatment.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that ambient hypothalamic cholinergic tone in diabetes is high, and of similar degree to the enhanced cholinergic tone in normal subjects pretreated with pyridostigmine. We suggest that in diabetic subjects, the reduced responsiveness to autofeedback may be secondary to the enhanced cholinergic tone demonstrated in these patients. The mechanisms linking the uncontrolled diabetic state to this abnormal neuroregulation of GH remains unknown at present.

Pyridostigmine-induced growth hormone responses in healthy and depressed subjects: evidence for cholinergic supersensitivity in depression

Theorists have extrapolated the cholinergic supersensitivity theory of affective disorder from a convincing and broad spectrum of clinical observation and research. This hypothesis is tested using a neuroendocrine probe approach with the challenge drug pyridostigmine, an indirect cholinergic agent thought to release growth hormone (GH) by decreasing inhibitory somatostatin tone. The consequent increments in plasma GH were considered to reflect central acetylcholine responsivity. Fifty-four volunteers were tested: 27 DSM-III-R major depressives (18 women and 9 men) and 27 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Subjects were cannulated at 9.00 h following an overnight fast and two baseline samples were taken at 15 min intervals. Pyridostigmine 120 mg was administered orally and thereafter samples were taken at the time points +60, +90, +120 and +180 min. GH responses were significantly greater in depressives than controls and this effect was more marked for men than women. These results support the proposal that muscarinic upregulation and/or supersensitivity is associated with depression.