Pharmacokinetics of buspirone following oral administration to rhesus monkeys

Benefit of buspirone on chemoreflex and central apnoeas in heart failure: a randomized controlled crossover trial

AIMS

Increased chemosensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) is an important trigger of central apnoeas (CA) in heart failure (HF), with negative impact on outcome. We hypothesized that buspirone, a 5HT_1A receptor agonist that inhibits serotonergic chemoreceptor neuron firing in animals, can decrease CO₂ chemosensitivity and CA in HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The BREATH study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study (EudraCT-code 2015-005383-42). Outpatients with systolic HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) and moderate-severe CA [nocturnal apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥15 events/h] were randomly assigned to either oral buspirone (15 mg thrice daily) or placebo for 1 week, with a crossover design (1 week of wash-out). The primary effectiveness endpoint was a decrease in CO₂ chemosensitivity >0.5 L/min/mmHg. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from serious adverse events. Sixteen patients (age 71.3 ± 5.8 years, all males, left ventricular ejection fraction 29.8 ± 7.8%) were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat analysis, more patients treated with buspirone (8/16, 50%) had a CO₂ chemosensitivity reduction >0.5 L/min/mmHg from baseline than those treated with placebo (1/16, 6.7%) (difference between groups 43%, 95% confidence interval 14-73%, P = 0.016). Buspirone compared to baseline led to a 41% reduction in CO₂ chemosensitivity (P = 0.001) and to a reduction in the AHI, central apnoea index and oxygen desaturation index of 42%, 79%, 77% at nighttime and 50%, 78%, 86% at daytime (all P < 0.01); no difference was observed after placebo administration (all P > 0.05). No patient reported buspirone-related serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Buspirone reduces CO₂ chemosensitivity and improves CA and oxygen saturation across the 24 h in patients with HF.

Therapeutic doses of buspirone block D3 receptors in the living primate brain

Dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) antagonists may be effective medications for multiple substance use disorders (SUDs). However, no selective D3R antagonists are currently available for clinical testing. Buspirone, originally characterized as a 5-HT1A partial agonist and used as an anxiolytic, also binds to D3R and D4R with high affinity, with lower affinity to D2R, and interferes with cocaine reward. Here we used PET with [11C]PHNO (D3R-preferring radioligand), [11C]raclopride (D2R/D3R radioligand) and [11C]NNC-112 (D1R radioligand) to measure occupancy of oral and parenteral buspirone in the primate brain. Intramuscular buspirone (0.19 and 0.5 mg/kg) blocked both [11C]PHNO and [11C]raclopride binding to striatum, exhibiting high occupancy (50-85%) at 15 min and rapid wash-out over 2-6 h. In contrast, oral buspirone (3 mg/kg) significantly blocked [11C]PHNO binding in D3-rich regions (globus pallidum and midbrain) at 3 h, but had minimal effects on [11C]raclopride binding (28-37% at 1 h and 10% at 3 h). Buspirone did not block [11C]NNC-112. Our findings provide evidence that i.m. buspirone blocks D3R and D2R, whereas oral buspirone is more selective towards D3R blockade in vivo, consistent with extensive first pass metabolism and supporting the hypothesis that its metabolites (5- and 6'-hydroxybuspirone) merit evaluation for treating SUDs. They also indicate that for oral buspirone to achieve greater than 80% sustained D3R occupancy, as might be needed to treat addiction, higher doses (at least three-fold) than those used to treat anxiety (maximal 60 mg) will be required. Nonetheless, based on previous clinical studies, these doses would be safe and well tolerated.

Effects of chronic buspirone treatment on cocaine self-administration

Cocaine abuse and dependence is a major public health problem that continues to challenge medication-based treatment. Buspirone (Buspar) is a clinically available, non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic medication that acts on both serotonin and dopamine systems. In recent preclinical studies, acute buspirone treatment reduced cocaine self-administration at doses that did not also decrease food-reinforced behavior in rhesus monkeys (Bergman et al, 2012). The present study evaluated the effectiveness of chronic buspirone treatment on self-administration of cocaine and food. Five adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were trained to self-administer cocaine and food during four 1-h daily sessions under a second-order schedule of reinforcement (FR2 [VR 16:S]). Buspirone (0.32 and 0.56 mg/kg/h) was administered intravenously through one lumen of a double-lumen catheter every 20 min for 23 h each day for 7-10 consecutive days. Each buspirone treatment period was followed by saline control treatment until drug- and food-maintained responding returned to baseline levels. Buspirone significantly reduced responding maintained by cocaine, and shifted the dose-effect curve downwards. Buspirone had minimal effects on food-maintained responding. In cocaine discrimination studies, buspirone (0.1-0.32 mg/kg, IM) did not antagonize the discriminative stimulus and rate-altering effects of cocaine in four of six monkeys. These findings indicate that buspirone selectively attenuates the reinforcing effects of cocaine in a nonhuman primate model of cocaine self-administration, and has variable effects on cocaine discrimination.

The use of C(av) rather than AUC in safety assessment

Toxicokinetic data have traditionally been presented as maximum observed plasma concentrations (C(max)) and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) values. These values have been used to compare exposures across studies and species to provide valuable interpretation of drug safety data. Increasingly, questions are asked of toxicology studies to more accurately describe the concentration effect relationships in terms of compound affinity for target and off-target receptors. C(max) values can immediately be referenced to known pharmacological activities, particularly when the extent of plasma protein binding is taken into account. This provides a measure of the more pharmacologically relevant free drug exposure. AUC values on the other hand contain the component of time, which means that direct comparison to pharmacological activity values are not immediately possible. Conversion of AUC to average plasma concentration (C(av)) provides a simple and convenient means to allow such a comparison without losing any information imparted by AUC values. In this paper, the benefit and advantage of applying C(av) values is illustrated using examples taken from the literature.