Vascular-selective effect of lercanidipine and other 1,4-dihydropyridines in isolated rabbit tissues

Lercanidipine Synergistically Enhances Bortezomib Cytotoxicity in Cancer Cells via Enhanced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Mitochondrial Ca2+ Overload

The proteasome inhibitor (PI), bortezomib (Btz), is effective in treating multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, but not solid tumors. In this study, we show for the first time that lercanidipine (Ler), an antihypertensive drug, enhances the cytotoxicity of various PIs, including Btz, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, in many solid tumor cell lines by inducing paraptosis, which is accompanied by severe vacuolation derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria. We found that Ler potentiates Btz-mediated ER stress and ER dilation, possibly due to misfolded protein accumulation, in MDA-MB 435S cells. In addition, the combination of Btz and Ler triggers mitochondrial Ca²⁺ overload, critically contributing to mitochondrial dilation and subsequent paraptotic events, including mitochondrial membrane potential loss and ER dilation. Taken together, our results suggest that a combined regimen of PI and Ler may effectively kill cancer cells via structural and functional perturbations of the ER and mitochondria.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Effects of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Oral Dose of a 15-mg Tylerdipine Tablet in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers

Tylerdipine hydrochloride is a novel L-type and T-type dual calcium channel antagonist that has the potential effects of expanding blood vessels and lowering blood pressure. It is expected to reduce the side effect of ankle edema observed with other drugs in the same class. A randomized, open-label, crossover phase 1 study was performed to evaluate the effect of food on the bioavailability of tylerdipine. Fourteen healthy male volunteers were enrolled. The administration of tylerdipine after a high-fat meal increased the bioavailability of tylerdipine. In the fed state there was a 130% increase in the mean total systemic exposure (AUC_inf ) and a 73% increase in the mean peak plasma concentration (C_max ) compared with that in the fasting state. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of C_max and AUC_inf were 2.54 (1.94, 3.33) and 1.75 (1.50, 2.04) for tylerdipine. The exposures of the 2 main metabolites M2 and M4 were increased by approximately 10% after a high-fat meal. The median time to peak plasma concentration of tylerdipine showed no difference between fasting and fed states.

Lercanidipine in the Management of Hypertension: An Update

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs), particularly dihydropyridine-CCBs, (DHP-CCBs), have an established role in antihypertensive therapy, either as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. Two hundred and fifty-one papers published in PubMed in English between January 1, 1990, and October 31, 2016, were identified using the keyword "lercanidipine." Lercanidipine is a lipophilic third-generation DHP-CCB, characterized by high vascular selectivity and persistence in the smooth muscle cell membranes. Lercanidipine is devoid of sympathetic activation, and unlike the first and second generation of DHP-CCBs, it dilates both the afferent and the efferent glomerular arteries, while preserving the intraglomerular pressure. In addition, lercanidipine prevents renal damage induced by angiotensin II and demonstrates anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-atherogenic properties through an increasing bioavailability of endothelial nitric oxide. It is associated with a regression of microvascular structural modifications in hypertensive patients. The efficacy of lercanidipine has been demonstrated in patients with different degrees of hypertension, in the young and elderly and in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. In patients with diabetes and renal impairment, lercanidipine displays a renal protection with a significant decrease of microalbuminuria and improvement of creatinine clearance. Lercanidipine is well tolerated and is associated with a very low rate of adverse events, particularly ankle edema, compared with amlodipine and nifedipine. In conclusion, lercanidipine produces a sustained blood pressure-lowering activity with a high rate of responder/normalized patients, associated with a favorable tolerability profile.

Lercanidipine attenuates angiotensin II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by blocking calcineurin-NFAT3 and CaMKII-HDAC4 signaling

Previous studies have demonstrated that lercanidipine, a calcium channel blocker, may protect against cardiac hypertrophy; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In the present study, the effects of lercanidipine on hypertrophy and the mechanisms involved were investigated. Cardiomyocytes isolated from neonatal rats were cultured and treated with angiotensin II (Ang II) in the presence or absence of lercanidipine or tacrolimus (FK506, a calcineurin inhibitor). Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to assess the mRNA expression of genes of interest, whereas the protein expression of calcium-dependent signaling molecules was detected using western blot analysis. In addition, the cell surface area and the nuclear translocation of target proteins were evaluated using immunofluorescence. The results of the present study demonstrated that lercanidipine and FK506 inhibited Ang II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, as evidenced by decreases in fetal gene (atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide) expression levels and cell surface area. Notably, lercanidipine suppressed Ang II-induced activation of calcineurin A (CnA) and nuclear factor of activated T cells 3 (NFAT3). In addition, calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII)-histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) signaling was also inhibited by lercanidipine. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that lercanidipine may ameliorate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, possibly partially by blocking Cn-NFAT3 and CaMKII-HDAC4 signaling.

Discovery and Development of Calcium Channel Blockers

In the mid 1960s, experimental work on molecules under screening as coronary dilators allowed the discovery of the mechanism of calcium entry blockade by drugs later named calcium channel blockers. This paper summarizes scientific research on these small molecules interacting directly with L-type voltage-operated calcium channels. It also reports on experimental approaches translated into understanding of their therapeutic actions. The importance of calcium in muscle contraction was discovered by Sidney Ringer who reported this fact in 1883. Interest in the intracellular role of calcium arose 60 years later out of Kamada (Japan) and Heibrunn (USA) experiments in the early 1940s. Studies on pharmacology of calcium function were initiated in the mid 1960s and their therapeutic applications globally occurred in the the 1980s. The first part of this report deals with basic pharmacology in the cardiovascular system particularly in isolated arteries. In the section entitled from calcium antagonists to calcium channel blockers, it is recalled that drugs of a series of diphenylpiperazines screened in vivo on coronary bed precontracted by angiotensin were initially named calcium antagonists on the basis of their effect in depolarized arteries contracted by calcium. Studies on arteries contracted by catecholamines showed that the vasorelaxation resulted from blockade of calcium entry. Radiochemical and electrophysiological studies performed with dihydropyridines allowed their cellular targets to be identified with L-type voltage-operated calcium channels. The modulated receptor theory helped the understanding of their variation in affinity dependent on arterial cell membrane potential and promoted the terminology calcium channel blocker (CCB) of which the various chemical families are introduced in the paper. In the section entitled tissue selectivity of CCBs, it is shown that characteristics of the drug, properties of the tissue, and of the stimuli are important factors of their action. The high sensitivity of hypertensive animals is explained by the partial depolarization of their arteries. It is noted that they are arteriolar dilators and that they cannot be simply considered as vasodilators. The second part of this report provides key information about clinical usefulness of CCBs. A section is devoted to the controversy on their safety closed by the Allhat trial (2002). Sections are dedicated to their effect in cardiac ischemia, in cardiac arrhythmias, in atherosclerosis, in hypertension, and its complications. CCBs appear as the most commonly used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. As far as hypertension is concerned, globally the prevalence in adults aged 25 years and over was around 40% in 2008. Usefulness of CCBs is discussed on the basis of large clinical trials. At therapeutic dosage, they reduce the elevated blood pressure of hypertensive patients but don't change blood pressure of normotensive subjects, as was observed in animals. Those active on both L- and T-type channels are efficient in nephropathy. Alteration of cognitive function is a complication of hypertension recognized nowadays as eventually leading to dementia. This question is discussed together with the efficacy of CCBs in cognitive pathology. In the section entitled beyond the cardiovascular system, CCBs actions in migraine, neuropathic pain, and subarachnoid hemorrhage are reported. The final conclusions refer to long-term effects discovered in experimental animals that have not yet been clearly reported as being important in human pharmacotherapy.

Lercanidipine hydrochloride versus felodipine sustained-release for mild-to-moderate hypertension: a multi-center, randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Lercanidipine hydrochloride and felodipine sustained-release tablets comparison for the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate primary hypertension.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study was designed as a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 281 adult patients (18-75 years) with a mild-to-moderate primary hypertension diagnosis were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to lercanidipine hydrochloride (n = 139; 81 males) or felodipine sustained-release tablets (n = 142; 87 males). Study duration was 8 weeks, including two run-in weeks and 6 weeks of treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The mean seated diastolic blood pressure (BP) change from baseline to 6 weeks of treatment was the primary endpoint. Main secondary efficacy parameters were: (i) mean seated systolic BP change from baseline to 6 weeks of treatment; (ii) normalization BP rate. The incidence of adverse events was also considered.

RESULTS

BP monitoring showed a significant decrease compared with baseline in diastolic BP (lercanidipine: from 96 ± 4 to 83 ± 6 mmHg, p < 0.0001; felodipine: from 96 ± 4 to 82 ± 5 mmHg, p < 0.0001). The mean systolic BP decreased, when compared with baseline values, by 18 mmHg and 19 mmHg in the lercanidipine and felodipine arm, respectively (p < 0.0001 versus baseline for both comparisons). The normalization rates of BP were 79.5% and 87.2%, in the lercanidipine and felodipine groups, respectively (in-office monitoring; p = n.s.). In total, 73 patients experienced 103 AEs: 26.6% (37/139) in the lercanidipine group and 25.3% (36/142) in the felodipine arm (p = n.s.). The analysis of safety showed no unexpected adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall short follow-up of the present study should be taken into account, lercanidipine is an effective and safe treatment option for BP control in adult patients with mild-to-moderate primary hypertension.

Role of manidipine in the management of patients with hypertension

Manidipine is a third-generation dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, which causes systemic vasodilation by inhibiting the voltage-dependent calcium inward currents in smooth muscle cells. In clinical studies, manidipine has been shown to significantly lower office and 24-h blood pressure compared with placebo in patients with essential hypertension. The resulting reduction in blood pressure is maintained over 24 h, with preservation of the circadian blood pressure pattern; its blood pressure-lowering capacity appears to be similar to that of other calcium antagonists. In elderly patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, manidipine is able to significantly decrease blood pressure compared with placebo for up to 3 years of treatment. The drug also significantly lowers blood pressure in patients with hypertension and concomitant Type 2 diabetes mellitus or renal impairment, and is devoid of adverse metabolic effects. It is well-tolerated with few untoward adverse effects related to vasodilation. In particular, manidipine appears to have less potential for pedal edema than other calcium channel blockers.

Results of a meta-analysis comparing the tolerability of lercanidipine and other dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers

BACKGROUND

Results from clinical studies suggest that the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) lercanidipine may be associated with a lower incidence of peripheral edema than are older dihydro-pyridine CCBs.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis of published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the relative risk (RR) of dihydropyridine CCB-specific adverse events with lercanidipine versus the older dihydro-pyridine CCBs (first generation: amlodipine, felodipine, and nifedipine), and versus the other lipophilic dihy-dropyridine CCBs (second generation: lacidipine and manidipine).

METHODS

A systematic literature search (all years through August 11, 2008) of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for English-language reports of single- or double-blind RCTs of > or = 4 weeks' duration that compared the tolerability of lercanidipine with other dihydropyridine CCBs in participants with mild (140-159/90-99 mm Hg) to moderate (160-179/100-109 mm Hg) hypertension.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs (6 used first-generation drugs, and 4 used second-generation drugs) met the criteria for inclusion. Efficacy outcomes for lowering blood pressure did not differ statistically between lercanid-ipine and either generation of medications. Compared with the first generation, lercanidipine was associated with a reduced risk of peripheral edema (52/742 with lercanidipine vs 88/627 with first generation; RR = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.31-0.62]), but not flushing or headache. The frequency of peripheral edema, flushing, and headache did not differ statistically between lercanidi-pine and the second-generation drugs. Study participants were less likely to withdraw from the RCTs because of peripheral edema (RR = 0.24 [95% CI, 0.12-0.47]) or any adverse event (RR = 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33-0.77]) when treated with lercanidipine rather than a drug from the first generation, but not when treated with lercanidipine rather than second-generation drugs.

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, lercanidipine was associated with a lower risk of peripheral edema and a lower risk of treatment withdrawal because of peripheral edema than were the first-generation, but not the second-generation, dihydropyridine CCBs.

Patient adherence and the choice of antihypertensive drugs: focus on lercanidipine

Despite the development of many effective antihypertensive drugs, target blood pressures are reached in only a minority of patients in clinical practice. Poor adherence to drug therapy and the occurrence of side effects are among the main reasons commonly reported by patients and physicians to explain the poor results of actual antihypertensive therapies. The development of new effective antihypertensive agents with an improved tolerability profile might help to partly overcome these problems. Lercanidipine is an effective dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker of the third generation characterized by a long half-life and its lipophylicity. In contrast to first-generation dihydropyridines, lercanidipine does not induce reflex tachycardia and induces peripheral edema with a lower incidence. Recent data suggest that in addition to lowering blood pressure, lercanidipine might have some renal protective properties. In this review we shall discuss the problems of drug adherence in the management of hypertension with a special emphasis on lercanidipine.

High doses of lercanidipine are better tolerated than other dihydropyridines in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome: results from the TOLERANCE study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

The TOlerabilidad de LERcanidipino 20 mg frente a Amlodipino y Nifedipino en CondicionEs normales de uso study was aimed to compare the tolerability of high doses of lercanidipine with amlodipine and nifedipine gastro-intestinal therapeutic system (GITS) in the treatment of hypertension in daily clinical practice.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Essential hypertensives >or= 18 years, treated during at least 1 month with lercanidipine 20 mg, amlodipine 10 mg or nifedipine GITS 60 mg, after a previous treatment course of at least 1 month with half the dose of the corresponding drugs were included. We present the data of the subgroup of patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS).

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-seven of the 650 study population fulfilled criteria of MetS, 233 (69.1%) on lercanidipine and 104 (30.9%) on amlodipine/nifedipine GITS. Overall, a significantly lower proportion of lercanidipine-treated patients showed adverse reactions (ARs) when compared with patients receiving other-dihydropyridines (DHPs) (60.1% vs. 73.1%, p = 0.003). Similarly, the most common vasodilation-related ARs (oedema, swelling, flushing and headache) were significantly less frequent in lercanidipine group (all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, lercanidipine appears to exhibit a better tolerability profile and less vasodilation-related ARs compared with other DHPs in hypertensive patients with MetS.

Hypertension, possible vascular protection and lercanidipine

Systemic hypertension is a major global problem contributing to enormous disease burden, premature morbidity and mortality. A substantial majority of hypertensive patients require long-term drug therapy for appropriate blood pressure control. Although there are many classes of antihypertensive drugs for clinical use, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have a special role in the management of hypertension owing to their well established safety and efficacy among the CCBs; the dihydropyridines (DHPs) are recognized for their predictable efficacy and dependability to achieve the recommended target goals of treatment. The older DHPs, such as nifedipine, felodipine and amlodipine, can cause bothersome side effects, such as ankle edema. The new-generation lipophilic DHP CCBs, such as lercanidipine, offer an advantage of less frequent occurrence of ankle edema. Furthermore, lercanidipine (in contrast to older DHPs) exerts favorable cardiorenal effects. Lercanidipine administered alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs represents a useful treatment option for efficient blood pressure control without causing significant adverse effects.

Increased vascular selectivity and prolonged pharmacological efficacy of the L-type Ca2+ channel antagonist lercanidipine in human cardiovascular tissue

1. The present study investigates the vasoselectivity of lercanidipine (LER), a 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, compared with amlodipine (AML) and nifedipine (NIF) in human cardiovascular tissue. Experiments were performed either in human left ventricular failing myocardium (orthotopic heart transplants) or in isolated right atrial trabeculae and isolated vessel preparations of arteria mammaria obtained from patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass operation. 2. The obtained rank order for the L-type Ca2+ channel affinity in human tissue was LER > NIF >or= AML. Lercanidipine had the lowest negative inotropic efficacy (1 micromol/L LER: 60.3% basal < AML: 79.1% basal < NIF: 92.4 basal) and potency (IC50 NIF: 3.5 nmol/L < AML: 48 nmol/L < Ler: 127 nmol/L) in right atrial trabeculae. 3. The vasorelaxant potency of LER (IC50 0.5 nmol/L) and AML (IC50 0.8 nmol/L) was similar and significantly increased compared with that of NIF (IC50 5.9 nmol/L) in arteria mammaria preparations of the very same patients. 4. The following rank order was obtained for vasoselectivity: LER (260) < AML (60) < NIF (0.6). 5. The pharmacological effects of LER and AML were still present 2 h after drug washout. 3. Lercanidipine is characterized by a high vasoselectivity and a prolonged interaction with the L-type calcium channel in human cardiovascular tissue This may be advantageous, especially in the treatment of patients with arterial hypertension.

Molecular mechanisms of vasoselectivity of the 1,4-dihydropyridine lercanidipine

The effects of (S)- and (R)-lercanidipine on CHO cells stably expressing the cardiac (Ca(v)1.2a) or vascular (Ca(v)1.2b) splice variant of the L-type calcium channel pore subunit were studied, using whole-cell and single-channel patch-clamp measurements. Lercanidipine block of Ca(v)1.2b current was enantioselective. (S)-lercanidipine was 4.1-fold more potent. Experiments using acidic solutions (pH 6.8) revealed a 6.4-fold enhanced inhibitory effect of (S)-lercanidipine compared with physiological conditions (pH 7.4) indicating that the charged form mediates inhibition. At depolarised holding potential (-40 mV), (S)-lercanidipine exhibited a 35-fold greater potency, compared with standard conditions (-80 mV). A comparison of the concentration-dependent inhibition of Ca(v)1.2a with Ca(v)1.2b subunit currents by (S)-lercanidipine revealed only a 1.8-fold difference in IC(50), but the slope of the dose-response curve was much steeper (n(H)=2.3) with Ca(v)1.2a, compared with Ca(v)1.2b (n(H)=0.8). This indicates overlap between agonistic and antagonistic effects, predominant with the cardiac Ca(v)1.2a subunit. This idea is supported by transient stimulatory effects, and a slight leftward shift of the IV curves. These effects were more prominent for Ca(v)1.2a than for Ca(v)1.2b. Single-channel experiments confirmed typical features of calcium channel agonists such as prolonged channel openings, a component of lengthened openings, and an enhanced open probability in the presence of (S)-lercanidipine. Again, these findings were concentration-dependent and more pronounced for Ca(v)1.2a than for Ca(v)1.2b. Our data indicate a splice-variant predominant agonism as a new mechanism contributing to the vasoselectivity of lercanidipine, along with marked voltage-dependence of action.

Therapeutic profile of manidipine and lercanidipine in hypertensive patients

Manidipine and lercanidipine are considered effective and safe in the treatment of chronic arterial hypertension and are equipotent in reducing blood pressure (BP) levels. Their main side effect is ankle-foot edema. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, these 2 drugs were compared in a controlled parallel-group study lasting 3 months, involving 53 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (26 assigned to manidipine and 27 to lercanidipine). At the end of the active treatment period, BP was significantly reduced in comparison with the end of the placebo phase in both the manidipine and the lercanidipine groups, without significant differences between the 2 drugs. Daytime BP was significantly reduced by 5.5%/5.6% with manidipine and by 3.8%/6.6% with lercanidipine, while smaller reductions were seen at nighttime. The smoothness index was the same with both drugs. Unlike lercanidipine, manidipine significantly reduced both basal (-30%) and minimal vascular resistance (-39%), qualifying it as a potent vasodilator. Despite vasodilation, heart rate was not increased but was even slightly reduced by treatment. Ankle-foot edema was observed with both drugs but was less pronounced with manidipine, probably because of greater postcapillary dilatation. In conclusion, manidipine and lercanidipine are both effective and safe in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, although the former seems to have a more favorable tolerability profile than the latter.

Lercanidipine : a review of its efficacy in the management of hypertension

Lercanidipine (Zanidip) is a vasoselective dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist that causes systemic vasodilation by blocking the influx of calcium ions through L-type calcium channels in cell membranes. It is a highly lipophilic drug that exhibits a slower onset and longer duration of action than other calcium channel antagonists. Furthermore, lercanidipine may have antiatherogenic activity unrelated to its antihypertensive effect. In two large, nonblind, noncomparative studies involving approximately 16 000 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, systolic blood pressure (BP) [SBP] and diastolic BP (DBP) were significantly reduced after 12 weeks' treatment with lercanidipine 10-20 mg/day. Furthermore, in the largest study, 64% of patients were responders (DBP <90 mm Hg) after 12 weeks of treatment and an additional 32% had their BP normalised (BP <140/90 mm Hg). In comparative trials, lercanidipine 10-20 mg/day was as effective as nifedipine slow release (SR) 20-40 mg twice daily, amlodipine 10 mg/day, felodipine 10-20 mg/day, nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 30-60 mg once daily or verapamil SR 240 mg/day at reducing SBP and DBP in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension after 2-16 weeks of therapy. In addition, 4 weeks of lercanidipine therapy (10 mg/day) was as effective as captopril 25mg twice daily, atenolol 50 mg/day or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day. Lercanidipine 5-30 mg/day effectively decreased BP in elderly patients (aged >60 years) with mild-to-moderate hypertension or isolated systolic hypertension to the same extent as amlodipine 5-10 mg/day, nifedipine GITS 30-60 mg/day or lacidipine 2-4 mg/day after 24-26 weeks of therapy. In addition, a limited number of studies suggest that lercanidipine may have antihypertensive efficacy in patients with severe or resistant hypertension, in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in postmenopausal women with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Lercanidipine is well tolerated, with most treatment-emergent events related to vasodilation. Common adverse events included headache, flushing and peripheral oedema. Importantly, the incidence of vasodilatory oedema was significantly lower in patients receiving lercanidipine than in those receiving some other calcium channel antagonists.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily lercanidipine is an effective and well tolerated antihypertensive agent in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

De la première à la quatrième génération de dihydropyridines : vers une meilleure efficacité et une meilleure tolérance

Dihydropyridines are among the most widely used drugs for the management of cardiovascular disease. Introduced in the 1960s, dihydropyridines have undergone several changes to optimise their efficacy and safety. Four generations of dihydropyridines are now available. The first-generation (nicardipine) agents have proven efficacy against hypertension. However, because of their short duration and rapid onset of vasodilator action, these drugs were more likely to be associated with adverse effects. The pharmaceutical industry responded to this problem by designing slow-release preparations of the short-acting drugs. These new preparations (second generation) allowed better control of the therapeutic effect and a reduction in some adverse effects. Pharmacodynamic innovation with regard to the dihydropyridines began with the third-generation agents (amlodipine, nitrendipine). These drugs exhibit more stable pharmacokinetics, are less cardioselective and, consequently, well tolerated in patients with heart failure. Highly lipophilic dihydropyridines are now available (lercanidipine, lacidipine). These fourth-generation agents provide a real degree of therapeutic comfort in terms of stable activity, a reduction in adverse effects and a broad therapeutic spectrum, especially in myocardial ischaemia and potentially in congestive heart failure.

Gender differences and antioxidant treatment affect aortic reactivity in short-term diabetic rats

Diabetes is associated with gender-specific macrovascular complications arising from increased oxidant stress in the vascular wall. In this study, male and female rats were treated with two structurally unrelated drugs sharing antioxidant properties, lercanidipine and Leucoselect (both 3 mg/kg/day), for 1 week starting 1 day after streptozotocin-diabetes induction. Concentration-response curves to L-nitroarginine methylester (L-NAME), superoxide dismutase and acetylcholine in aortic rings showed significantly greater nitric oxide-mediated relaxation in female compared with male non-diabetic rats. Diabetes increased contractility to noradrenaline and L-NAME in both genders, whereas relaxation to acetylcholine and iloprost were significantly attenuated in females only. Treatment with lercanidipine and Leucoselect restored, at least in part, responses to noradrenaline, acetylcholine and iloprost without affecting those to L-NAME and sodium nitroprusside. Unexpectedly, both drugs impaired superoxide dismutase response in female tissues. In conclusion, female rat aorta is markedly exposed to short-term diabetic vascular injury, which may be prevented by antioxidant treatment.

Lercanidipine: a review of its use in hypertension

Lercanidipine is a vasoselective dihydropyridine calcium antagonist which causes systemic vasodilation by blocking the influx of calcium ions through L-type calcium channels in cell membranes. It is a highly lipophilic drug and as such has a slower onset and longer duration of action than a number of other calcium antagonists. Preclinical evidence suggests that lercanidipine has antiatherogenic potential and it may also protect against end-organ damage. In well controlled clinical studies, once daily administration of lercanidipine 10 or 20mg effectively reduced blood pressure (BP) compared with placebo in patients with mild to moderate hypertension without affecting heart rate. Response rate (percentage of patients with diastolic BP < or =90mm Hg or reduced by > or =10mm Hg from baseline) ranged from 50 to 66% with lercanidipine 10 mg/day and up to 86% with lercanidipine 20 mg/day. The drug had a long duration of action: clinical measurements for diastolic BP yielded a trough/peak ratio of >0.8 for both lercanidipine dosages in 1 study. Comparative trials, either published in full or as abstracts, found lercanidipine 10mg once daily for > or =4 weeks to be at least as effective as atenolol 50mg once daily, candesartan cilexetil 16 mg/day, captopril 25mg twice daily, enalapril 20 mg/day, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg once daily, irbesartan 150 mg/day and slow release nifedipine 20mg twice daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In addition, lercanidipine 20 mg/day was as effective as amlodipine 10 mg/day. Lercanidipine is effective in the treatment of elderly patients (aged 60 to 85 years) with mild to moderate essential hypertension and in those with isolated systolic hypertension. In addition, monotherapy with lercanidipine 20 or 40 mg/day has shown efficacy in patients with severe hypertension, and add-on therapy helped control BP in a large proportion of patients with severe hypertension not responding sufficiently to beta-blockers, diuretics or ACE inhibitors. Unpublished data indicate that the drug reduces blood pressure in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, without adversely affecting glucose homeostasis. Lercanidipine was well tolerated in clinical trials, with most treatment-related adverse events typical of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, namely headache, flushing, dizziness and ankle oedema.

CONCLUSIONS

Lercanidipine is an effective and well tolerated once daily antihypertensive agent in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In addition, the drug may reduce BP when used as monotherapy in patients with severe hypertension or when used adjunctively in patients with resistant hypertension. Importantly, lercanidipine appears to be at least as effective and well tolerated as other commonly used antihypertensive agents. The drug therefore represents a useful therapeutic option in the management of patients with hypertension and will be particularly useful in patients not responding to, or intolerant of, antihypertensive agents from other drug classes.