Randomized, controlled, dose-ranging trial of carisbamate for partial-onset seizures

Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Current Treatments, Novel Therapeutics, and Future Directions

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is a severe drug-resistant developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with slow spike and wave on EEG (DEE-SSW) composing about 1-2% of epilepsy patients. Seizures in DEE-SSW are caused by a variety of etiologies, and there is a large unmet treatment need as seizures are usually treatment-resistant and individuals are often unable to function independently. The updated definition by the International League Against Epilepsy has established formal diagnostic criteria allowing for more uniform diagnosis. This article provides a review of typical medication management and treatment strategies, including new and developing surgical approaches. Future directions in treatment include expanding genetic testing with the potential for gene therapy and continuously improving surgical options with the goal to prevent progression to DEE-SSW.

Time-to-event clinical trial designs: Existing evidence and remaining concerns

Well-designed placebo-controlled clinical trials are critical to the development of novel treatments for epilepsy, but their design has not changed for decades. Patients, clinicians, regulators, and innovators all have concerns that recruiting for trials is challenging, in part, due to the static design of maintaining participants for long periods on add-on placebo when there are an increasing number of options for therapy. A traditional trial maintains participants on blinded treatment for a static period (e.g., 12 weeks of maintenance), during which participants on placebo have an elevated risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy compared to patients on an active treatment. Time-to-event trials observe participants on blinded treatment until a key event occurs (e.g., post-randomization seizure count matches pre-randomization monthly seizure count). In this article, we review the evidence for these designs based on re-analysis of prior trials, one published trial that used a time-to-second seizure design, and experience from an ongoing blinded trial. We also discuss remaining concerns regarding time-to-event trials. We conclude that, despite potential limitations, time-to-event trials are a potential promising mechanism to make trials more patient friendly and reduce placebo exposure, which are urgent needs to improve safety and increase recruitment to trials.

Reasons for ineligibility for clinical trials of patients with medication-resistant epilepsy

Selection criteria for clinical trials for medication-resistant epilepsy are used to limit variability and to ensure safety. However, it has become more challenging to recruit subjects for trials. This study investigated the impact of each inclusion and exclusion criterion on medication-resistant epilepsy clinical trial recruitment at a large academic epilepsy center. We retrospectively identified all patients with medication-resistant focal or generalized onset epilepsy who attended an outpatient clinic over a consecutive 3-month period. We assessed each patient's eligibility for trials with commonly required inclusion and exclusion criteria to evaluate the proportion of eligible patients and the most common reasons for exclusion. Among 212 patients with medication-resistant epilepsy, 144 and 28 patients met the criteria for focal or generalized onset epilepsy, respectively. Overall, 9.4% (n = 20) patients were eligible for trials (19 focal onset and one generalized onset). Most patients were excluded from the study due to insufficient seizure frequency (58% of focal onset, 55% of generalized onset). A small proportion of patients with medication-resistant epilepsy were eligible for trials based on common selection criteria. These eligible patients may not be representative of the general population of patients with medication-resistant epilepsy. Insufficient seizure frequency was the most common reason for exclusion.

The efficacy and safety of ganaxolone for the treatment of refractory epilepsy: A meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy is one of the most common and refractory neurological disorders globally. Ganaxolone, a neuroactive steroid that enhances GABAergic inhibition, has been tested in many trials for the resolution of refractory epilepsy. Based on these, our study implemented a meta-analysis to evaluate the general benefit of ganaxolone for refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to June 20, 2022. The risk ratio (RR) and standard mean difference (SMD) were analyzed using dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively with a random effect model. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was also performed to judge the reliability of results.

RESULTS

We totally collected 659 patients from four RCTs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ganaxolone. As results showed, ≥50% reduction in mean seizure frequency has improved significantly compared with placebo (RR = 1.60, 95%CI: 1.02-2.49, p = 0.04, I²  = 30%), which is supported by TSA. However, the percentage of seizure-free days shows no statistical significance (p = 0.36). For safety outcomes, adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events, and AE leading to study drug discontinuation all revealed no obvious difference between ganaxolone and placebo (p > 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Based on our research, we have observed that ganaxolone is safe and has potential efficacy in the treatment of refractory epilepsy, waiting for further studies.

Carisbamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Many people with epilepsy are drug-resistant and require add-on therapy, meaning that they concomitantly take multiple antiepileptic drugs. Carisbamate is a drug which is taken orally and inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels. Carisbamate may be useful for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of carisbamate when used as an add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases on 8 April 2021: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid) 1946 to April 07, 2021. CRS Web includes randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the specialised registers of Cochrane review groups including Epilepsy. We also searched ongoing trials registers, checked reference lists, and contacted authors of the included trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blind randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing carisbamate versus placebo or another antiepileptic drug, as add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Trials could have a parallel-group or cross-over design.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected the trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. The primary outcome was 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency (responder rate). The secondary outcomes were: seizure freedom, treatment withdrawal (for any reason and due to adverse events); adverse events, and quality of life. We analysed data using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and according to the intention-to-treat population. We presented results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs involving a total of 2211 participants. All four trials compared carisbamate with placebo for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Participants in all trials were over 16 years of age and received at least one other antiepileptic drug concomitantly. We detected substantial risk of bias across the included trials. All four trials were at high risk of attrition bias due to the incomplete reporting of attrition and the high treatment withdrawal rates noted, especially with higher doses. All four trials also had unclear risk of detection bias, as they did not specify whether outcome assessors were blinded. Meta-analysis suggested that carisbamate produced a higher responder rate compared to placebo (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.62; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). More participants in the carsibamate group achieved seizure freedom (RR 2.43, 95% CI 0.84 to 7.03; 1 study); withdrew from treatment for any reason (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.12; 4 studies); and withdrew from treatment due to adverse events (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.78 to 4.17; 4 studies) than in the placebo group. However, the evidence for the three outcomes was very low-certainty. There was no difference between treatment groups for the proportion of participants experiencing at least one adverse event (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.30; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). More participants in the carisbamate group than in the placebo group developed dizziness (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.44; 4 studies; very low-certainty evidence) and somnolence (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.58; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence), but not fatigue (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.68; 3 studies); headache (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.38; 4 studies); or nausea (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.75; 3 studies). None of the included trials reported quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that carisbamate may demonstrate efficacy and tolerability as an add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Importantly, the evidence for all outcomes except responder rate was of low to very low certainty, therefore we are uncertain of the accuracy of the reported effects. The certainty of the evidence is limited by the significant risk of bias associated with the included studies, as well as the statistical heterogeneity detected for some outcomes. Consequently, it is difficult for these findings to inform clinical practice. The studies were all of short duration and only included adult study populations. There is a need for further RCTs with more clear methodology, long-term follow-up, more clinical outcomes, more seizure types, and a broader range of participants.

Qualification and application of liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometric method for the determination of carisbamate in rat plasma and prediction of its human pharmacokinetics using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling

Carisbamate is an antiepileptic drug and it also has broad neuroprotective activity and anticonvulsant reaction. In this study, a liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometric (LC-qTOF-MS) method was developed and applied for the determination of carisbamate in rat plasma to support in vitro and in vivo studies. A quadratic regression (weighted 1/concentration²), with an equation y = ax² + bx + c, was used to fit calibration curves over the concentration range from 9.05 to 6,600 ng/mL for carisbamate in rat plasma. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies of carisbamate have been studied through the developed bioanalytical method. Based on these study results, human pharmacokinetic (PK) profile has been predicted using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. The PBPK model was optimized and validated by using the in vitro and in vivo data. The human PK of carisbamate after oral dosing of 750 mg was simulated by using this validated PBPK model. The human PK parameters and profiles predicted from the validated PBPK model were similar to the clinical data. This PBPK model developed from the preclinical data for carisbamate would be useful for predicting the PK of carisbamate in various clinical settings.

The safety of medications used to treat peripheral neuropathic pain, part 1 (antidepressants and antiepileptics): review of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral neuropathic pain is a highly disabling condition for patients and a challenge for neurologists and pain physicians. Although many drugs have been assessed in scientific studies, few have demonstrated a clear clinical efficacy against neuropathic pain. Moreover, the paucity of data regarding their safety raised the question on the benefit-risk ratio when used in patients experiencing peripheral neuropathies.

AREAS COVERED

The authors conducted a review of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials to assess the safety of medications used to treat neuropathic pain. This first review was focused on antidepressant and antiepileptic medications. The aim was to provide an overview of the treatment-emergent adverse events (≥10%) and the serious adverse effects described in clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Among antiepileptics and antidepressants, duloxetine appeared to have the most detailed safety for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. Over all studies, the most commonly reported adverse effects were dizziness, drowsiness, nausea, and constipation. Only 20.0% of the included studies (N = 90) presented a good description of adverse effects that included a statistical comparison vers usa placebo group. Important methodological improvements must be made to improve the assessment of medication safety in future clinical trials.

Methodological issues associated with clinical trials in epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

despite methodological advances in epilepsy clinical trials, the proportion of patients reaching seizure-freedom has not substantially changed over the years. We review the main methodological limitations of current trials, the possible strategies to overcome these limits, and the issues that need to be addressed in next future. Area covered: references were identified by PubMed search until March 2017 and unpublished literature was searched on ClinicalTrials.gov. Add-on trials mainly involve refractory epilepsy subjects, reducing overall response to the investigational drug. The inclusion of subjects with earlier disease from less developed countries has partially allowed overcoming this limitation, but has introduced more random variability of results. Monotherapy trials rise methodological, economical, and ethical concerns with different regulatory requirements in European Union and in the United States of America. Newer trial designs, such as futility trials or 'time-to-event' design, have been implemented. Moreover, both add-on and monotherapy trials results might be affected by patient's ability to recognize and record seizures, and by randomness of seizures occurrence over time. Possible strategies to achieve more reliable outcomes are detailed. Expert commentary: clinical trial methodology needs to be optimized to better address regulatory agencies requirements and to encounter both patients' and clinicians' needs.

Carisbamate blockade of T-type voltage-gated calcium channels

OBJECTIVES

Carisbamate (CRS) is a novel monocarbamate compound that possesses antiseizure and neuroprotective properties. However, the mechanisms underlying these actions remain unclear. Here, we tested both direct and indirect effects of CRS on several cellular systems that regulate intracellular calcium concentration [Ca²⁺ ]_i .

METHODS

We used a combination of cellular electrophysiologic techniques, as well as cell viability, Store Overload-Induced Calcium Release (SOICR), and mitochondrial functional assays to determine whether CRS might affect [Ca²⁺ ]_i levels through actions on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria, and/or T-type voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels.

RESULTS

In CA3 pyramidal neurons, kainic acid induced significant elevations in [Ca²⁺ ]_i and long-lasting neuronal hyperexcitability, both of which were reversed in a dose-dependent manner by CRS. Similarly, CRS suppressed spontaneous rhythmic epileptiform activity in hippocampal slices exposed to zero-Mg²⁺ or 4-aminopyridine. Treatment with CRS also protected murine hippocampal HT-22 cells against excitotoxic injury with glutamate, and this was accompanied by a reduction in [Ca²⁺ ]_i . Neither kainic acid nor CRS alone altered the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ) in intact, acutely isolated mitochondria. In addition, CRS did not affect mitochondrial respiratory chain activity, Ca²⁺ -induced mitochondrial permeability transition, and Ca²⁺ release from the ER. However, CRS significantly decreased Ca²⁺ flux in human embryonic kidney tsA-201 cells transfected with Ca_v 3.1 (voltage-dependent T-type Ca²⁺ ) channels.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data indicate that the neuroprotective and antiseizure activity of CRS likely results in part from decreased [Ca²⁺ ]_i accumulation through blockade of T-type Ca²⁺ channels.

Antiepileptic drugs in development pipeline: A recent update

Epilepsy is the most common neurological disorder which significantly affects the quality of life and poses a health as well as economic burden on society. Epilepsy affects approximately 70 million people in the world. The present article reviews the scientific rationale, brief pathophysiology of epilepsy and newer antiepileptic drugs which are presently under clinical development. We have searched the investigational drugs using the key words ‘antiepileptic drugs,’ ‘epilepsy,’ ‘Phase I,’ ‘Phase II’ and ‘Phase III’ in American clinical trial registers (clinicaltrials.gov), the relevant published articles using National Library of Medicine's PubMed database, company websites and supplemented results with a manual search of cross-references and conference abstracts. This review provides a brief description about the antiepileptic drugs which are targeting different mechanisms and the clinical development status of these drugs. Besides the presence of old as well as new AEDs, still there is a need of new drugs or the modified version of old drugs in order to make affected people free of seizures. An optimistic approach should be used to translate the success of preclinical testing to clinical practice. There is an urgent need to improve animal models and to explore new targets with better understanding in order to develop the novel drugs with more efficacy and safety.

•

This review primarily focused on antiepileptic drugs under clinical development.

•

The more realistic approach is needed to discover and develop the novel antiepileptic drugs.

•

Modification of conventional drugs or search of newer targets can lead to development of promising antiepileptic drugs.

•

To develop more efficacious and safe drugs for treatment of epilepsy and refractory seizures

•

There are a number of novel antiepileptic compounds which are under various stages of drug development.

The anticonvulsant actions of carisbamate associate with alterations in astrocyte glutamine metabolism in the lithium-pilocarpine epilepsy model

As reported previously, in the lithium-pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), carisbamate (CRS) produces strong neuroprotection, leads to milder absence-like seizures, and prevents behavioral impairments in a subpopulation of rats. To understand the metabolic basis of these effects, here we injected 90 mg/kg CRS or vehicle twice daily for 7 days starting 1 h after status epilepticus (SE) induction in rats. Two months later, we injected [1-¹³ C]glucose and [1,2-¹³ C]acetate followed by head microwave fixation after 15 min. ¹³ C incorporation into metabolites was analyzed using ¹³ C magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We found that SE reduced neuronal mitochondrial metabolism in the absence but not in the presence of CRS. Reduction in glutamate level was prevented by CRS and aspartate levels were similar to controls only in rats displaying absence-like seizures after treatment [CRS-absence-like epilepsy (ALE)]. Glutamine levels in CRS-ALE rats were higher compared to controls in hippocampal formation and limbic structures while unchanged in rats displaying motor spontaneous recurrent seizures after treatment (CRS-TLE). Astrocytic mitochondrial metabolism was reduced in CRS-TLE, and either enhanced or unaffected in CRS-ALE rats, which did not affect the transfer of glutamine from astrocytes to neurons. In conclusion, CRS prevents reduction in neuronal mitochondrial metabolism but its effect on astrocytes is likely key in determining outcome of treatment in this model. To understand the metabolic basis of the strong neuroprotection and reduction in seizure severity caused by carisbamate (CRS) in the lithium-pilocarpine (Li-Pilo) model of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we injected CRS for 7 days starting 1 h after status epilepticus and 2 months later [1-¹³ C]glucose and [1,2-¹³ C]acetate. ¹³ C Magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis was performed on brain extracts and we found that CRS prevented reduction in neuronal mitochondrial metabolism but its effect on astrocytes was likely key in determining outcome of treatment in this model. ALE = absence like epilepsy; acetyl CoA = acetyl coenzyme A; GS = glutamine synthetase; PAG = phosphate activated glutaminase; PC = pyruvate carboxylase; OAA = oxaloacetate; TCA cycle = tricarboxylic acid cycle.

Efficacy and safety of carisbamate in patients with diabetic neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia: results from 3 randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trials

The results of 3 proof-of-concept studies to evaluate carisbamate's efficacy and safety in treating neuropathic pain are presented. In studies 1 (postherpetic neuralgia, n = 91) and 2 (diabetic neuropathy, n = 137), patients received carisbamate 400 mg/day or placebo for 4 weeks and then crossed over to the other treatment for 4 weeks. In study 3 (diabetic neuropathy, higher carisbamate doses), patients (n = 386) were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive either carisbamate 800 mg/day, 1200 mg/day, pregabalin 300 mg/day or placebo for 15 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was the mean of the last 7 average daily pain scores obtained on days the study drug was taken, for all 3 studies. Least square mean (95% CI) differences between carisbamate and placebo groups on the primary end point were as follows: study 1: -0.512 (-1.32, 0.29) carisbamate 400 mg/day; study 2: -0.307 (-0.94, 0.33) carisbamate 400 mg/day; and study 3: -0.51 (-1.10, 0.08), carisbamate 800 mg/day; -0.55 (-1.13, 0.04), carisbamate 1200 mg/day; and -0.43 (-1.01, 0.15), pregabalin 300 mg/day. Neither carisbamate (all 3 studies) nor pregabalin (study 3) significantly differed from placebo, although multiple secondary end points showed significant improvement in efficacy with carisbamate in studies 1 and 2. Dizziness was the only treatment-emergent adverse event occurring at ≥10% difference in carisbamate groups versus placebo (study 1: 12% vs. 1%; study 3: 14% vs. 4%; study 2: 1% vs. 2%). Carisbamate, although well tolerated, did not demonstrate efficacy in neuropathic pain across these studies, nor did the active comparator pregabalin (study 3).

Treatment strategies

There has been important progress in the identification of antiepileptic compounds and their indications in children over the past 15 years: their number has doubled and specific pediatric trials are being performed to document their effect according to seizures and syndromes as well as their tolerability in pediatrics. The improved understanding of pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions has helped to optimize treatment. Specific issues specific of infants have also been studied although new antiepileptic drugs are still dramatically lacking for this age group. Before reaching a syndromic diagnosis, the choice of a first- line agent goes to compounds with the largest range of efficacy and least identified risks. Subsequent choices are mainly based on the epilepsy syndrome and seizure type in addition to good clinical practice to determine dose, adverse effect profile, risk of aggravating seizures and drug interactions, clinician's experience, cultural habits, and availability of drugs. If there are several options, preference is given to the compound that exhibits the best risk/benefit ratio, or the most rapid titration when seizure frequency is the major issue. For new antiepileptic compounds, price is often a limiting factor in countries with poor insurance coverage. Third generation anti-epileptic drugs are emerging which also seem to be promising.

Ezogabine: An Evaluation of Its Efficacy and Safety as Adjunctive Therapy for Partial-Onset Seizures in Adults

Objective:

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic properties, and clinical application of ezogabine (retigabine. INN), an antiepileptic drug approved in 2011.

Data Sources:

Published data from in vitro, animal, and clinical studies were obtained from PubMed and CINAHL searches, from January 1980 to March 31, 2012. Other relevant data regarding the safety and efficacy of ezogabine were obtained from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medication Agency Web sites.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Selected articles were prospective in vitro, animal, and controlled clinical studies of ezogabine. Non-English-language articles were excluded.

Data Synthesis:

In vitro and animal studies show that ezogabine activates voltage-gated potassium channels, leading to reduction of seizure frequency by inhibiting hyperexcitability activity in the central nervous system. Additionally, ezogabine enhances γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) activity and de novo GABA synthesis. Eight clinical studies of ezogabine have been published, 5 being Phase 1 clinical trials in healthy subjects and 3 being Phase 3 clinical trials in patients with pharmacoresistant partial-onset seizures. Phase 3 clinical trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ezogabine in patients with partial-onset seizures.

Conclusions:

Clinical trials have shown that ezogabine is efficacious as an adjunctive agent in patients with pharmacoresistant partial seizures. Careful monitoring of drug interactions and adverse reactions is necessary. While ezogabine is efficacious (or partial seizures, its precise role in the management of patients with epilepsy is yet to be determined.

Effect of carisbamate on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy participants

Carisbamate's effect (200 mg twice-daily [study 1], 600 mg twice-daily [study 2]) on warfarin's (25 mg single dose) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (international normalized ratio) was assessed during 2 open-label studies in healthy participants. Coadministration of either carisbamate regimen produced small changes on the mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the last measurable time point (AUC(last)) of (S)- and (R)-warfarin, which are unlikely to be clinically significant. For (S)-warfarin, the ratios (with carisbamate/without carisbamate) of geometric means for C(max) were 105.44 (study 1) and 98.48 (study 2) and for AUC(last) were 109.33 (study 1) and 114.43 (study 2); the corresponding 90% confidence intervals were within the bioequivalence limits of 80% to 125%. Results were similar for (R)-warfarin. Carisbamate at 600 mg (but not 200 mg) twice-daily prolonged the elimination half-life of (S)- and (R)-warfarin by ~10 hours (25% and 32% increase, respectively). Prothrombin time was unaltered by either carisbamate dose. Adverse events with the highest incidence were dizziness (50%) and headache (50%) in study 1 and somnolence (56%) in study 2. Warfarin exposure and international normalized ratio were unaffected by coadministration of carisbamate 200 mg or 600 mg twice-daily. Carisbamate was well tolerated.

Cognitive effects of carisbamate in randomized, placebo-controlled, healthy-volunteer, multidose studies

Adverse cognitive effects are an important concern for drugs that influence the central nervous system. Carisbamate is a novel drug in development for treatment of seizures and neuropathic pain. Information on its cognitive effects is limited. Three controlled, multiple-dose, crossover studies with treatment durations of 5-9 days were designed to examine the cognitive effects of carisbamate on healthy volunteers. In one study, apparent dose-dependent effects on response, vigilance, and recognition speed were observed (1000 mg and 1500 mg/day). Carisbamate did not differ from placebo for most variables in the other two studies, but increased reaction time and reduced Sternberg memory were seen at higher dosages. Carisbamate did not produce clinically significant adverse effects on cognitive performance at doses <1000 mg/day. Effects were mild to modest at the higher doses tested.

Carisbamate (RWJ-333369) inhibits glutamate transmission in the granule cell of the dentate gyrus

Carisbamate (CRS, RWJ-333369) is a novel antiepileptic drug awaiting approval for use in the treatment of partial and generalized seizures. Our aim was to determine whether CRS modulates synaptic transmission in the dentate gyrus (DG) and the underlying mechanism. The whole-cell patch-clamp method was used to record AMPA receptor- and NMDA receptor-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSC(AMPA) and EPSC(NMDA)) and GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in granule cells of the DG in brain slices prepared from 3- to 5-week-old male Wistar rats. CRS (30-300 μM) inhibited the evoked EPSC(AMPA) and EPSC(NMDA) by the same extent (20%) with significantly altered CV(-2), suggesting presynaptic modulation. It did not significantly change the inward currents induced by AMPA application. The inhibitory effect of CRS on the evoked EPSC(AMPA) was not occluded by selective voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel blockers, ruling out the involvement of presynaptic Ca(2+) channels. The frequency, but not the amplitude, of spontaneous EPSC(AMPA) was significantly reduced by CRS. However, CRS did not alter either the frequency or the amplitude of TTX-insensitive miniature EPSC(AMPA), indicating an action potential-dependent mechanism was involved. In addition, CRS (100 or 300 μM) did not significantly change the amplitude of the evoked IPSCs. To summarize, our results suggest that CRS reduces glutamatergic transmission by an action potential-dependent presynaptic mechanism and consequently inhibits excitatory synaptic strength in the DG without affecting GABAergic transmission. This effect may contribute to the antiepileptic action observed clinically at therapeutic concentrations of CRS.

Carisbamate acutely suppresses spasms in a rat model of symptomatic infantile spasms

PURPOSE

Infantile spasms are the signature seizures of West syndrome. The conventional treatments for infantile spasms, such as adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and vigabatrin, are not always effective, especially in symptomatic infantile spasms (SIS). We tested the efficacy of carisbamate, a novel neurotherapeutic drug, to suppress spasms in the multiple-hit rat model of SIS, and compared it with phenytoin to determine if its effect is via sodium-channel blockade.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats received right intracerebral infusions of doxorubicin and lipopolysaccharide at postnatal day 3 (PN3) and intraperitoneal p-chlorophenylalanine at PN5. A single intraperitoneal injection of carisbamate was administered at PN4, after the onset of spasms, at the following doses: 10 mg/kg (CRS-10), 30 mg/kg (CRS-30), and 60 mg/kg (CRS-60), and was compared to vehicle-injected group (VEH). Video-monitoring of PN6-7 CRS-60 or VEH-injected pups was also done.

KEY FINDINGS

Carisbamate acutely reduced both behavioral spasms (CRS-30 and CRS-60 groups only) and electroclinical spasms during the first 2-3 postinjection hours, without detectable toxicity or mortality. In contrast, phenytoin (20 or 50 mg/kg) failed to suppress spasms.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings provide preclinical evidence that carisbamate displays acute anticonvulsive effect on spasms through a sodium channel-independent mechanism. Because spasms in the multiple-hit rat model are refractory to ACTH and transiently sensitive to vigabatrin, carisbamate may constitute a candidate new therapy for SIS, including the ACTH-refractory spasms. Further confirmation with clinical studies is needed.

Carisbamate has powerful disease-modifying effects in the lithium-pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy

Lithium-pilocarpine, a relevant model of temporal lobe epilepsy was used to test the neuroprotective and antiepileptogenic effects of carisbamate. Status epilepticus (SE) was induced in adult rats by lithium and pilocarpine. Carisbamate (30, 60, 90, and 120 mg/kg) was injected at 1 and 9 h after SE onset and continued twice daily for 6 additional days. The reference groups received diazepam instead of carisbamate. Neuroprotection was assessed during the first 24 h of SE with Fluoro-Jade B and after 14 days with thionine staining. SE severity and epileptic outcome were assessed by video, and surface and depth electroencephalographic recordings. At the two highest doses, carisbamate treatment reduced SE severity; produced strong neuroprotection of hippocampus, ventral cortices, thalamus, and amygdala; prevented mossy fiber sprouting in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus; and delayed or suppressed the occurrence of spontaneous motor seizures. Rats with no spontaneous motor seizures displayed spike-and-wave discharges that share all the characteristics of absence seizures. In conclusion, carisbamate is able to induce strong neuroprotection and affect the nature of epileptogenic events occurring during and after lithium-pilocarpine status epilepticus, reflecting marked insult- and disease-modifying effects.

Antiepileptic and antiepileptogenic performance of carisbamate after head injury in the rat: blind and randomized studies

Carisbamate (CRS) exhibits broad acute anticonvulsant activity in conventional anticonvulsant screens, genetic models of absence epilepsy and audiogenic seizures, and chronic spontaneous motor seizures arising after chemoconvulsant-induced status epilepticus. In add-on phase III trials with pharmacoresistant patients CRS induced < 30% average decreases in partial-onset seizure frequency. We assessed the antiepileptogenic and antiepileptic performance of subchronic CRS administration on posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) induced by rostral parasaggital fluid percussion injury (rpFPI), which closely replicates human contusive closed head injury. Studies were blind and randomized, and treatment effects were assessed on the basis of sensitive electrocorticography (ECoG) recordings. Antiepileptogenic effects were assessed in independent groups of control and CRS-treated rats, at 1 and 3 months postinjury, after completion of a 2-week prophylactic treatment initiated 15 min after injury. The antiepileptic effects of 1-week CRS treatments were assessed in repeated measures experiments at 1 and 4 months postinjury. The studies were powered to detect ~50 and ~40% decreases in epilepsy incidence and frequency of seizures, respectively. Drug/vehicle treatment, ECoG analysis, and [CRS](plasma) determination all were performed blind. We detected no antiepileptogenic and an equivocal transient antiepileptic effects of CRS despite [CRS](plasma) comparable with or higher than levels attained in previous preclinical and clinical studies. These findings contrast with previous preclinical data demonstrating large efficacy of CRS, but agree with the average effect of CRS seen in clinical trials. The data support the use of rpFPI-induced PTE in the adolescent rat as a model of pharmacoresistant epilepsy for preclinical development.

Factors determining response to antiepileptic drugs in randomized controlled trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Because of the lack of head-to-head adjunctive-therapy trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in refractory partial epilepsy, meta-analyses of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent a potentially important source of evidence to guide treatment decisions. However, such indirect comparisons raise various methodologic issues that may hamper their relevance.

METHODS

All RCTs in adult refractory partial epilepsy were analyzed to assess whether efficacy outcomes are influenced by: characteristics of patients and trials ; use of last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis; evaluation period (entire period versus maintenance period); and year of publication. A meta-analysis of these AEDs was then performed taking these factors into consideration.

KEY FINDINGS

Sixty-three RCTs evaluating 20 AEDs were included. The following variables influenced efficacy estimates: (1) responder rates correlated positively with duration of the entire treatment period (p = 0.038); (2) response to placebo was significantly greater in the maintenance period than in the entire treatment period (p = 0.005); (3) responder rates increased over the years both for AEDs (p < 0.001) and for placebo (p = 0.001); (4) LOCF analysis overestimated responder rates for AEDs (p < 0.001) and for placebo (p = 0.001) compared with completer-based analysis, and the overestimation correlated positively with withdrawal rates (p < 0.001). A meta-analysis of available data showed large differences in efficacy ranking in relation to dose selection and type of analysis, but these were mostly nonsignificant due to statistical power limitations.

SIGNIFICANCE

Several methodologic issues hamper the relevance of indirect comparisons of AEDs in the adjunctive-therapy of refractory partial epilepsy. Some of these issues could be overcome by improved standardization in the reporting of efficacy outcomes.

New and investigational antiepileptic drugs

In the last fifteen years, new antiepileptic medications have been offered for the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Nevertheless, despite optimal medical treatment, up to 30% of patients still experience recurrent seizures and the challenge for new, more efficacious and better-tolerated drugs continues. New antiepileptic drugs include the evolution of pre-existing drugs and new compounds identified through the investigation of additional molecular targets, such as SV2A synaptic vesicle protein, voltage-gated potassium channels, ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors, and gap junctions. This paper reviews the available information on various classes of molecules that are in the pipeline as well as on the innovative approaches to the treatment of epilepsy.

Carisbamate, a novel antiepileptic candidate compound, attenuates alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats

BACKGROUND

Since 1994, when naltrexone (Revia) was approved by the FDA for the treatment of alcoholism, only 2 other drugs (Campral and Topamax have been approved for alcoholism treatment. However, various experimental drugs, including antiepileptic medications, have been tested in both animal models and in humans with some promising results. The purpose of this project was to study the effect of the novel neuromodulator carisbamate, which is in development for epilepsy treatment, on alcohol intake in selectively bred alcohol-preferring rats.

METHODS

Male alcohol-preferring inbred P rats were allowed to freely drink water or alcohol (10%, v/v) using a 2-bottle choice procedure. After stable baselines for alcohol and water intakes were established, the acute effects of oral carisbamate (0, 10, 30, 45, 60, and 90 mg/kg) were assessed. Then, the chronic effect of the compound (60 mg/kg/day for 14 consecutive days) on alcohol intake was assessed in a separate group of male P rats. In another set of experiments, the effects of carisbamate and naltrexone on alcohol withdrawal-induced elevated drinking of alcohol, an index of craving, were compared. Rats were withdrawn from alcohol for 24 hours and were given vehicle, 20 mg/kg naltrexone or 60 mg/kg carisbamate 30 minutes before re-exposure to alcohol. Alcohol and water intake was measured 6 hours after alcohol re-exposure. To determine the effects of carisbamate on saccharin preference, rats were put on a 2-bottle choice of water versus a solution of 2% saccharin. Then, the effect of the highest dose of carisbamate (90 mg/kg) and naltrexone (20 mg/kg) and the vehicle on saccharin preference was determined.

RESULTS

Our results showed that there was a selective dose-dependent reduction in alcohol intake and preference in the alcohol-preferring P rat after an acute oral administration of carisbamate. There were no significant effects on food or water intake. Chronic administration of carisbamate significantly reduced alcohol intake and preference initially, but partial tolerance developed after the 10th treatment. The degree of tolerance development was less than that observed for naltrexone. Acute administration of carisbamate was more effective than naltrexone in reducing enhanced alcohol intake after a period of alcohol deprivation. Compared with control vehicle neither carisbamate nor naltrexone had a significant effect on saccharin intake and preference.

CONCLUSION

The novel neuromodulator compound carisbamate has a favorable profile of effects on alcohol intake and related measures and should be considered for testing on human alcoholics.