Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobazam in Adults With Drug-Refractory Epilepsy

Cost-effectiveness of clobazam as an adjunctive treatment for refractory epilepsy in China

BACKGROUND

Clobazam (CLB) is an effective, safe and well-tolerated adjunctive treatment for refractory epilepsy. However, the cost-effectiveness of CLB in China remains unclear.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CLB as an adjunctive therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy in China.

METHOD

A Markov model was established to simulate the lifetime epilepsy process in patients. The epilepsy remission rate, health state utility and mortality data were derived from clinical trials and the literature. The costs were collected from the health care system in the hospital. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which was calculated by comparing CLB as an add-on therapy with conventional therapy and was assessed in the context of the Chinese health system. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter uncertainty, and several scenario analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

Compared with maintaining conventional therapy, adding CLB as an adjuvant therapy increased the cost of Chinese Yuan (CNY) 1770.17 over a lifetime, with an incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) value of 1.02, resulting in an ICER of CNY 1737.10 per QALY gained. The daily dose of CLB had the strongest effect on the ICER. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that the probability of CLB being cost-effective was 77.35% at a willingness to pay (WTP) of CNY 85698/QALY.

CONCLUSION

CLB is a cost-effective add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy in the Chinese population.

Update on Antiseizure Medications 2025

OBJECTIVE

This article is an update from the article on antiseizure medication therapy published in the three previous Continuum issues on epilepsy and is intended to cover the vast majority of agents currently available to neurologists in the management of patients with epilepsy. This article addresses antiseizure medications individually, focusing on key pharmacokinetic characteristics, indications, and modes of use.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Since the most recent version of this article was published, one new antiseizure medication, ganaxolone, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the indications of some approved medications were expanded. Older antiseizure medications are effective but have tolerability and pharmacokinetic disadvantages. Several newer antiseizure medications have undergone comparative trials demonstrating efficacy equal to and tolerability at least equal to or better than older antiseizure medications as first-line therapy for focal epilepsy. These agents include lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, topiramate, zonisamide, and lacosamide. Pregabalin was found to be less effective than lamotrigine. Lacosamide, pregabalin, and eslicarbazepine have undergone successful trials of conversion to monotherapy for focal epilepsy. Other newer antiseizure medications with a variety of mechanisms of action are suitable for adjunctive therapy.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Knowledge of antiseizure medication pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability profiles facilitates the choice of appropriate antiseizure medication therapy for patients with epilepsy. Rational antiseizure medication combinations should avoid antiseizure medications with unfavorable pharmacokinetic interactions or pharmacodynamic interactions related to mechanism of action.

A comprehensive systematic literature review of the burden of illness of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome on patients, caregivers, and society

Fully elucidating the burden that Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) places on individuals with the disease and their caregivers is critical to improving outcomes and quality of life (QoL). This systematic literature review evaluated the global burden of illness of LGS, including clinical symptom burden, care requirements, QoL, comorbidities, caregiver burden, economic burden, and treatment burden (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022317413). MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles that met predetermined criteria. After screening 1442 deduplicated articles and supplementary manual searches, 113 articles were included for review. A high clinical symptom burden of LGS was identified, with high seizure frequency and nonseizure symptoms (including developmental delay and intellectual disability) leading to low QoL and substantial care requirements for individuals with LGS, with the latter including daily function assistance for mobility, eating, and toileting. Multiple comorbidities were identified, with intellectual disorders having the highest prevalence. Although based on few studies, a high caregiver burden was also identified, which was associated with physical problems (including fatigue and sleep disturbances), social isolation, poor mental health, and financial difficulties. Most economic analyses focused on the high direct costs of LGS, which arose predominantly from medically treated seizure events, inpatient costs, and medication requirements. Pharmacoresistance was common, and many individuals required polytherapy and treatment changes over time. Few studies focused on the humanistic burden. Quality concerns were noted for sample representativeness, disease and outcome measures, and reporting clarity. In summary, a high burden of LGS on individuals, caregivers, and health care systems was identified, which may be alleviated by reducing the clinical symptom burden. These findings highlight the need for a greater understanding of and better definitions for the broad spectrum of LGS symptoms and development of treatments to alleviate nonseizure symptoms.

Drug-resistant generalized epilepsies: Revisiting the frontiers of idiopathic generalized epilepsies

The 2017 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification suggested that the term "genetic generalized epilepsies" (GGEs) should be used for the broad group of epilepsies with so-called "generalized" seizure types and "generalized" spike-wave activity on EEG, based on a presumed genetic etiology. Within this framework, idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs) are described as a subset of GGEs and include only four epileptic syndromes: childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, and epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone. The recent 2022 ILAE definition of IGEs is based on the current state of knowledge and reflects a community consensus and is designed to evolve as knowledge advances. The term "frontiers of IGEs" refers to the actual limits of our understanding of these four syndromes. Indeed, among patients presenting with a syndrome compatible with the 2022 definition of IGEs, we still observe a significant proportion of patients presenting with specific clinical features, refractory seizures, or drug-resistant epilepsies. This leads to the discussion of the boundaries of IGEs and GGEs, or what is accepted within a clinical spectrum of a definite IGE. Here, we discuss several entities that have been described in the literature for many years and that may either constitute rare features of IGEs or a distinct differential diagnosis. Their recognition by clinicians may allow a more individualized approach and improve the management of patients presenting with such entities.

Tolerability of clobazam as add-on therapy in patients aged 50 years and older with drug-resistant epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the tolerability of clobazam in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy aged 50 years and older.

METHODS

We performed a single center, retrospective chart review of patients at least 50 years of age with drug resistant epilepsy of any type who started clobazam as an add on therapy. Retention rate, safety, and tolerability at 6 and 12 months and last follow-up, and the discontinuation rate due to side effects were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62 ± 7.1 years, and 69.2% of patients were female. The mean baseline seizure frequency before initiation of clobazam was 2 (range 1-30) seizures per month. The mean total daily dose of clobazam administered was 13 (range 5 to 30) mg/day. At the 12-month follow-up visit after clobazam initiation, 40% of patients were seizure-free and an additional 45% of patients had > 50% reduction in seizure frequency. The mean seizure frequency at 12-month follow-up was 1.5 (range 0-24) seizures per month. The mean total dose of clobazam at 12-month follow-up was 14.25 (range 5 to 25) mg/day. The mean duration of clobazam at last follow was 55.2 ± 27.02 (mean ± SD months) and 18 (69.2%) patients remained on clobazam. Twenty out of 26 (76.9%) patients reported at least one side effect and 6/26 (23%) discontinued the medication within a month of initiation. At last follow-up, 40% remained seizure free on stable dosing.

CONCLUSION

Clobazam can be a safe and tolerable, add-on treatment older adults with drug-resistant epilepsy. Those who responded tolerated the medication well. Discontinuation due to side effects occurred soon after initiation of therapy.

Treatment of Comorbid Anxiety and Epilepsy

Objective: Anxiety is among the most common psychiatric illnesses, and it commonly co-occurs with epilepsy. This review of the existing literature on anxiety comorbid with epilepsy aims to generate new insights into strategies for assessment and treatment. Methods: The authors conducted a narrative literature review to select key publications that help clarify the phenomenology and management of comorbid anxiety and epilepsy. Results: Anxiety symptoms may be relevant even if the criteria for a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder are not met. Associating specific seizure types or seizure localization with anxiety symptoms remains difficult; however, the amygdala is a brain region commonly associated with seizure foci and panic or fear sensations. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis may also be relevant for anxiety symptoms, particularly for the selection of treatments. Nonpharmacological treatment is appropriate for anxiety comorbid with epilepsy, particularly because relaxation techniques may reduce hypersympathetic states, which improve symptoms. Medication options include antidepressants and anticonvulsants that may have efficacy for anxiety symptoms. Benzodiazepines are a good choice to address this comorbid condition, although side effects may limit utility. Conclusions: Ultimately, there are numerous treatment options, and although there is a limited evidence base, quality of life may be improved with appropriate treatment for individuals experiencing comorbid anxiety and epilepsy.

Update on Antiseizure Medications 2022

EDITORS NOTE

The article "Update on Antiseizure Medications 2022" by Dr Abou-Khalil was first published in the February 2016 Epilepsy issue of Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology as "Antiepileptic Drugs," and at the request of the Editor-in-Chief was updated by Dr Abou-Khalil for the 2019 issue and again for this issue.