1
|
Bao F, Yu L, Zhang X, Mu Q. Bidirectional association between breast cancer and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PeerJ 2025; 13:e18888. [PMID: 39902325 PMCID: PMC11789662 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Cognitive decline following cancer treatment can vary from mild cognitive impairment to severe dementia. However, there is inconsistent evidence regarding the relationship between breast cancer survivors and their risk of developing dementia. This meta-analysis aims to consolidate observational studies to explore the bidirectional association between breast cancer and dementia risk. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search using medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to identify cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies examining the link between breast cancer and dementia risk. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata version 14.0, with a random effects model employed to account for heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. Results This meta-analysis included 13 studies with a total of 346,051 participants, up to June 20, 2024. Of these, seven studies investigated the risk of dementia among patients with breast cancer, revealing a lower risk [OR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.27-1.18], I2 = 99.1%, P = 0.128]. Similarly, seven studies explored the risk of breast cancer in individuals with dementia, showing a lower risk as well [OR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.51-1.22], I2 = 94.5%, P = 0.290]. Conclusion Our findings indicate that breast cancer is less likely to lead to dementia and that dementia is similarly low associated with risk of breast cancer. These insights are crucial for clinicians in guiding the prevention and monitoring of neurodegenerative conditions in patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuxing Bao
- Department of Ultrasound, Inner Mongolia Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Liang Yu
- Department of Ultrasound, Inner Mongolia Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Xiaolei Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Inner Mongolia Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Qier Mu
- Department of Ultrasound, Inner Mongolia Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Torre M, Zanella CA, Feany MB. The Biological Intersection Between Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2025:S0002-9440(25)00026-4. [PMID: 39863251 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Revised: 11/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2025]
Abstract
Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia and one of the leading causes of death in elderly patients. The number of patients with AD in the United States is projected to double by 2060. Thus, understanding modifiable risk factors for AD is an urgent public health priority. In parallel with the number of patients with AD, the number of cancer survivors is estimated to increase significantly, and up to 80% of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy will develop cognitive deficits, termed chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment. This review discusses biologically plausible pathways underlying both disorders, with the goal of understanding why a proportion of chemotherapy patients may be at higher risk of developing AD. Highlighted are the E4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuronal and synaptic loss, cellular senescence, brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling, white matter damage, blood-brain barrier/vascular dysfunction, tau pathology, and transposable element reactivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Torre
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; Center for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| | - Camila A Zanella
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mel B Feany
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee H, Ahn J, Jiang C, Lee Y, Kim HC, Lee H. Post-diagnosis smoking habit change and incident dementia in cancer survivors. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:7013-7023. [PMID: 39118441 PMCID: PMC11485076 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many individuals change their smoking habits after cancer diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the association of post-diagnosis smoking habit change with incident dementia in cancer survivors. METHODS We identified 558,127 individuals who were diagnosed with cancer at age ≥ 20 and survived for ≥ 3 years. Participants were classified into four groups: (1) sustained non-smokers, (2) initiators/relapsers, (3) quitters, and (4) continuing smokers. Dementia risk in each group was assessed using a cause-specific Cox model. RESULTS After cancer diagnosis, 2.3% of pre-diagnosis non-smokers initiated/relapsed into smoking, while 51.7% of pre-diagnosis smokers quit smoking. Compared to sustained non-smokers, multivariable-adjusted risk of dementia was 29% higher among initiators/relapsers, 11% higher among quitters, and 31% higher among continuing smokers. Compared to continuing smokers, the risk was 15% lower among quitters. DISCUSSION In cancer survivors, smoking initiation/relapse was associated with increased risk of dementia, whereas smoking cessation was associated with decreased risk of dementia. HIGHLIGHTS Approximately half of pre-diagnosis smokers quit smoking after a cancer diagnosis. Smoking cessation was associated with a 15% reduced risk of dementia. More than 2% of pre-diagnosis non-smokers initiated or relapsed into smoking after a cancer diagnosis. Smoking initiation/relapse was associated with a 29% elevated risk of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeok‐Hee Lee
- Department of Preventive MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
- Department of Internal MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
- Institute for Innovation in Digital HealthcareYonsei UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Jaeun Ahn
- Department of PsychiatryNational Health Insurance Service Ilsan HospitalGoyang‐siGyeonggi‐doRepublic of Korea
- Institute of Behavioral Science in MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Changchuan Jiang
- Division of Hematology and OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Young‐gun Lee
- Department of NeurologyIlsan Paik HospitalInje University College of MedicineGoyang‐siGyeonggi‐doRepublic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Chang Kim
- Department of Preventive MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
- Department of Internal MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
- Institute for Innovation in Digital HealthcareYonsei UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Hokyou Lee
- Department of Preventive MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
- Department of Internal MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
- Institute for Innovation in Digital HealthcareYonsei UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mandelblatt J, Dage JL, Zhou X, Small BJ, Ahles TA, Ahn J, Artese A, Bethea TN, Breen EC, Carroll JE, Cohen HJ, Extermann M, Graham D, Claudine I, Jim HSL, McDonald BC, Nakamura ZM, Patel SK, Rebeck GW, Rentscher KE, Root JC, Russ KA, Tometich DB, Turner RS, Van Dyk K, Zhai W, Huang LW, Saykin AJ. Alzheimer disease-related biomarkers and cancer-related cognitive decline: the Thinking and Living with Cancer study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:1495-1507. [PMID: 38788675 PMCID: PMC11378315 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated whether plasma Alzheimer disease (AD)-related biomarkers were associated with cancer-related cognitive decline among older breast cancer survivors. METHODS We included survivors aged 60-90 years with primary stage 0-III breast cancers (n = 236) and frequency-matched noncancer control paricipant (n = 154) who passed a cognitive screen and had banked plasma specimens. Participants were assessed at baseline (presystemic therapy) and annually for up to 60 months. Cognition was measured using tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function and learning and memory; perceived cognition was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function v3 Perceived Cognitive Impairments. Baseline plasma neurofilament light, glial fibrillary acidic protein, β-amyloid 42 and 40 and phosphorylated tau 181 were assayed using single molecule arrays. Mixed models tested associations between cognition and baseline AD biomarkers, time, group (survivor vs control participant), and their 2- and 3-way interactions, controlling for age, race, Wide Range 4 Achievement Test Word Reading score, comorbidity, and body mass index; 2-sided P values of .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS There were no group differences in baseline AD-related biomarkers except survivors had higher baseline neurofilament light levels than control participants (P = .013). Survivors had lower adjusted longitudinal attention, processing speed, and executive function than control participants starting from baseline and continuing over time (P ≤ .002). However, baseline AD-related biomarker levels were not independently associated with adjusted cognition over time, except control participants had lower attention, processing speed, and executive function scores with higher glial fibrillary acidic protein levels (P = .008). CONCLUSION The results do not support a relationship between baseline AD-related biomarkers and cancer-related cognitive decline. Further investigation is warranted to confirm the findings, test effects of longitudinal changes in AD-related biomarkers, and examine other mechanisms and factors affecting cognition presystemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Dage
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, and Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ashley Artese
- Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Traci N Bethea
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Breen
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Judith E Carroll
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martine Extermann
- Senior Adult Oncology Program, Department of Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Deena Graham
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Isaacs Claudine
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brenna C McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sunita K Patel
- Department of Population Sciences and Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - G William Rebeck
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kelly E Rentscher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristen A Russ
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics and National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer’s and Related Dementias, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Danielle B Tometich
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - R Scott Turner
- Department of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Li-Wen Huang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|