Retrospective Pediatric Cohort Study Validates NEOS Score and Demonstrates Applicability in Children With Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis

Brain magnetic resonance imaging as predictors in pediatric anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the associations between brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes and clinical profiles in children with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis.

METHODS

Clinical data and brain MRI results of children diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center from October 2014 to June 2022 were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

A total of 143 children (Male: female 54:89) were enrolled, with a mean onset age of 6.8 years (6.8 ± 3.1). 40.6 % (58/143) of patients had abnormal initial brain MRI. Lesions in temporal lobe (34.5 %, 20/58) and frontal lobe (25.9 %, 15/58) were relatively common. Children with abnormal initial brain MRI were prone to have fever (P = 0.023), dystonia (P = 0.037), positive MOG antibodies (P = 0.015), higher cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell count (WBC) (P = 0.019) and to receive rituximab treatment (P = 0.037). There were no significant differences in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores before immunotherapy, after immunotherapy and at last follow-up between the normal initial brain MRI group and abnormal group. No initial brain MRI changes were found to be associated with relapses. Brain MRI was reviewed in 72 patients at last follow-up with a median follow-up time of 25.5 months and 48.6 % (35/72) of patients had abnormal brain MRI. The mRS score of the group with normal brain MRI at last follow-up was significantly lower than that of the abnormal group.

CONCLUSIONS

About 40.0 % of children with anti-NMDAR encephalitis had abnormal initial brain MRI. Initial brain MRI was associated with certain clinical profiles, but not with relapse and prognosis. Around half of patients had abnormal brain MRI at last follow-up and were prone to have higher mRS score.

Genetic, serological and clinical evaluation of childhood myasthenia syndromes- single center subgroup analysis experience in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Congenital myasthenic syndrome is a disease that occurs due to several types such as mutations in different pre-synaptic, synaptic, post-synaptic proteins and, glycosylation defects associated with congenital myopathy. Juvenile myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune condition usually caused by antibodies targeting the acetylcholine receptor.

AIMS

Our objective is to conduct an analysis on the subgroup traits exhibited by patients who have been diagnosed with congenital myasthenic syndrome and juvenile myasthenia gravis, with a focus on their long-term monitoring and management.

METHODS

This study was conducted on children diagnosed with myasthenia gravis, who were under the care of Dokuz Eylul University's Department of Pediatric Neurology for a period of ten years.

RESULTS

A total of 22 (12 congenital myasthenic syndrome, 10 juvenile myasthenia gravis) patients were identified. Defects in the acetylcholine receptor (6/12) were the most common type in the congenital myasthenic syndrome group. Basal-lamina-related defects (5/12) were the second most prevalent. One patient had a GFPT1 gene mutation (1/12). Patients with ocular myasthenia gravis (n = 6) exhibited milder symptoms. In the generalized myasthenia gravis group (n = 4), specifically in postpubertal girls, a more severe clinical progression was observed, leading to the implementation of more aggressive treatment strategies.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that clinical recognition of congenital myasthenic syndrome and knowledge of related genes will aid the rapid diagnosis and treatment of these rare neuromuscular disorders. Findings in the juvenile myasthenia gravis group demonstrate the impact of pubertal development and the need for timely and appropriate active therapy, including thymectomy, to improve prognosis.

Clinical scales in autoimmune encephalitis-A retrospective monocentric cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Assessing severity of antibody-mediated encephalitis (AE) or paraneoplastic encephalitis (PE) requires valid and reliable scores to guide treatment decisions and predict outcome both in clinical routine and studies. We aimed to validate the prognostic value of the clinical assessment scale in autoimmune encephalitis (CASE) and the anti-NMDAR-encephalitis one-year functional status (NEOS) score in patients suffering from AE and PE in a large monocentric cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively applied the CASE and NEOS score to patients with definite AE and PE treated at a tertiary hospital. Correlations were established between the CASE and NEOS score and the modified Rankin scale (mRs). Multivariable analyses were calculated to identify predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (27 AE, 7 PE) were included. Correlations between mRS and CASE score were strongest in patients with AE compared to PE at all intervals, but in the subgroups (LGI1, NMDAR, GAD, miscellaneous surface antibodies, PE) the correlation was strongest in the interval after baseline. Patients with AE seemed to display better outcomes compared to PE, which was underlined by multivariable analysis. Improvement was mostly observed within 6-12 months after disease onset, after which little or no further improvement was noted with some exception for two patients with anti-NMDARE who recovered substantially even after 12 months of treatment. The NEOS score significantly predicted the outcome at last follow-up in patients with AE with a sensitivity of 79% at a cut-off value of 2 points (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-0.99, p = 0.04).

INTERPRETATION

The CASE and NEOS score are suitable supplementary tools in addition to the mRS for capturing diverse symptoms, for grading and monitoring symptom severity.