Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in myasthenia gravis exacerbation: A prospective, open-label trial

Chinese expert consensus on the application of intravenous immunoglobulin in hematological diseases

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), first developed for the treatment of patients with antibody deficiencies, is now widely used in clinical practice, especially in hematological and immune system diseases, and its application in hematological oncology chemotherapy, cellular immunotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is becoming more and more common. The Chinese Collaborative Group for Infection Immunology and Microecology Research Translation Collaborative Group organized relevant experts to discuss and propose the "Chinese expert consensus on the application of intravenous immunoglobulin in hematological diseases," which was formulated based on the progress of research on the application of IVIG in blood diseases, and provides a basis for the standardization of the use of IVIG in hematologic disorders.

Promising therapies for the treatment of myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune condition targeting the neuromuscular junction, which manifests with neuromuscular symptoms of varying severity and significant morbidity. The mainstay of treatment in MG is mitigation of the immune cascade with steroids and non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapies. The therapeutic strategies in MG are transitioning from broad and indiscriminate immunosuppression to novel agents targeting key steps in MG pathogenesis, including T cell activation, B cell proliferation, complement activation, maintenance of pathogenic antibody production, and proinflammatory cytokine production.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, an overview of the pathogenesis of MG and traditional MG therapies is presented, followed by a discussion of the novel MG drugs that have been evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials with an emphasis on those which have received regulatory approval.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel MG therapeutics belonging to the classes of complement inhibitors, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors and B cell depletors, as well as the other emerging MG drugs in the pipeline constitute promising treatment strategies with potentially better efficacy and safety compared to the conventional MG treatments. However, further long-term research is needed in order to optimize the implementation of these new treatment options for the appropriate patient populations.

[Neurophysiological substantiation and validity assessment of manual muscle testing in clinical practice. (A literature review)]

The relevance of the study of neuromuscular dysfunction's causes and mechanisms is undeniable, considering the large number of nosologies accompanied by malfunction of muscles. Adequate diagnosis and correction of these disorders is impossible without understanding of their pathogenetic mechanisms. Currently, manual muscle testing (MMT) is a widespread technique. MMT is an agile diagnostic tool used by physiatrists, doctors in sports medicine, osteopaths and rehabilitation physicians to assess the functional status of muscles. Unconditionally, this method attracts with its low cost, which will optimize the financial costs of hospital and the healthcare system as a whole. In addition, there is no clear substantiation of the objectivity and validity of the MMT to date. The article considers the issues of neurophysiological principles, classification of methods and approaches, assessment criteria of repeatability and accuracy of MMT. Understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of MMT effectiveness will allow to timely correct the therapy and improve the results of treatment and rehabilitation of patients with neuromuscular dysfunction.

Novel Immunotherapies for Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG), a prototype autoimmune neurological disease, had its therapy centred on corticosteroids, non-steroidal broad-spectrum immunotherapy and cholinesterase inhibitors for several decades. Treatment-refractory MG and long-term toxicities of the medications have been major concerns with the conventional therapies. Advances in the immunology and pathogenesis of MG have ushered in an era of newer therapies which are more specific and efficacious. Complement inhibitors and neonatal Fc receptor blockers target disease-specific pathogenic mechanisms linked to myasthenia and have proven their efficacy in pivotal clinical studies. B cell-depleting agents, specifically rituximab, have also emerged as useful for the treatment of severe MG. Many more biologicals are in the pipeline and in diverse stages of development. This review discusses the evidence for the novel therapies and the specific issues related to their clinical use.

Usefulness of subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in the management of myasthenia gravis: a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

To describe the efficacy of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG).

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted in the neuromuscular referral center of Bordeaux (between January 1, 2014 and March 31, 2021) with MG patients treated with SCIg. The main outcome was SCIg efficacy assessed by the before and after SCIg Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification, the duration of hospitalization and the number of days of orotracheal intubation (OTI).

Results

Sixteen patients were included in the study (11 females; 5 males). Nine patients were still treated with SCIg at the end of the study (March 31, 2021) and then underwent prospective follow-up. The average age of the patients was 56.1 (19–83) years. The median duration of MG at onset of SCIg was 37.4 months. Eight patients (50%) remained stable (4 in stage MGFA-IV and 4 in MGFA-III). Eight patients (50%) improved: 3 from MGFA-IV to MGFA-III, 1 from MGFA-IV to MGFA-II, 1 from MGFA-IV to MGFA-I, 2 from MGFA-III to MGFA-II and 1 from MGFA-III to MGFA-I (no patient worsened). The duration of disease progression did not appear to affect the response to SCIg therapy. The number of hospital days per month was significantly reduced after SCIg compared to before, and the number of days in intensive care unit and the number of days of OTI were also reduced. Only minor adverse effects were noted, and 80% of patients were in favor of continuing SCIg.

Conclusions

SCIg is a well-tolerated and useful treatment in MG, offering interesting perspectives in the management of MG patients. However, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and other targeted immunotherapies in myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Several patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) do not adequately respond to available drugs or exhibit poor tolerance, necessitating the need for new therapies.

AREAS COVERED

The paper discusses the rapidly evolving target-specific immunotherapies that promise long-standing remissions in the management of MG. It is specifically focused on the role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and the anti-FcRn and B cell monoclonals.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-AChR antibodies cause internalization of the receptors and activate complement leading to in situ MAC formation that damages the post-synaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Inhibiting MAC formation by antibodies targeting key complements subcomponents is a reasonable therapeutic goal. Indeed, the anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies, Eculizumab, Ravulizumab, and Zilucoplan, have been successfully tested in MG with Eculizumab first and now Ravulizumab FDA-approved for refractory MG based on sustained long-term benefits. Among the biologics that inhibit FcRn, Efgartigimod caused rapid reduction of the circulating IgG in the lysosomes, and induced sustained clinical remission with good safety profile leading to FDA-approved indication. Anti-B cell agents, like Rituximab, can induce sustained long-term remissions, especially in IgG4 antibody-mediated Musk-MG, by targeting short-lived antibody-secreting plasmablasts. These biologics offer effective targeted immunotherapies with good tolerance promising to change the therapeutic algorithm in the chronic MG management.

An update on the use of immunoglobulins as treatment for myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody mediated disease where pathogenic antibodies interact with the acetylcholine receptor or other proteins at the post-synaptic neuromuscular junction. There is growing evidence that immunoglobulin infusions are beneficial for clinical exacerbations and chronic refractory disease and may be an option for patients unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies.

AREAS COVERED

We performed an extensive literature review, looking for evidence on the use of immunoglobulins for the treatment of MG, by conducting a search in MEDLINE (1946 to present), EMBASE (1947 to present) and Clinicaltrials.gov. We have included studies on the use of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIG) for acute deterioration and chronic disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of IVIG in MG provides an option for rapid improvement in critical deterioration, being preferred over more invasive and less available therapies such as plasmapheresis. For refractory MG, the addition of IVIG can improve a patient's status and reduce the dosage of immunosuppressive medications. The alternative of SCIG is also effective and has advantages of infusion time flexibility, fewer side-effects, and patient independence. The safety and efficacy of both interventions, patient preferences and quality of life may direct therapeutic choices in the future.

Pharmacotherapy of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis with Special Emphasis on Newer Biologicals

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic, fluctuating, antibody-mediated autoimmune disorder directed against the post-synaptic neuromuscular junctions of skeletal muscles, resulting in a wide spectrum of manifestations ranging from mild to potentially fatal. Given its unique natural course, designing an ideal trial design for MG has been wrought with difficulties and evidence in favour of several of the conventional agents is weak as per current standards. Despite this, acetylcholinesterases and corticosteroids have remained the cornerstones of treatment for several decades with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) offering rapid treatment response, especially in crises. However, the treatment of MG entails long-term immunosuppression and conventional agents are viable options but take longer to act and have a number of class-specific adverse effects. Advances in immunology, translational medicine and drug development have seen the emergence of several newer biological agents which offer selective, target-specific immunotherapy with fewer side effects and rapid onset of action. Eculizumab is one of the newer agents that belong to the class of complement inhibitors and has been approved for the treatment of refractory general MG. Zilucoplan and ravulizumab are other agents in this group in clinical trials. Neisseria meningitis is a concern with all complement inhibitors, mandating vaccination. Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors prevent immunoglobulin recycling and cause rapid reduction in antibody levels. Efgartigimod is an FcRn inhibitor recently approved for MG treatment, and rozanolixizumab, nipocalimab and batoclimab are other agents in clinical trial development. Although lacking high quality evidence from randomized clinical trials, clinical experience with the use of anti-CD20 rituximab has led to its use in refractory MG. Among novel targets, interleukin 6 (IL6) inhibitors such as satralizumab are promising and currently undergoing evaluation. Cutting-edge therapies include genetically modifying T cells to recognise chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) and chimeric autoantibody receptors (CAAR). These may offer sustained and long-term remissions, but are still in very early stages of evaluation. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) allows immune resetting and offers sustained remission, but the induction regimens often involve serious systemic toxicity. While MG treatment is moving beyond conventional agents towards target-specific biologicals, lack of knowledge as to the initiation, maintenance, switching, tapering and long-term safety profile necessitates further research. These concerns and the high financial burden of novel agents may hamper widespread clinical use in the near future.

Advances and challenges in the treatment of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease with fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability. Standard immunomodulatory treatment may fail to achieve sufficient improvement with minimal symptom expression or remission of myasthenic symptoms, despite adequate dosing and duration of treatment. Treatment-resistant MG poses a challenge for both patients and treating neurologists and requires new therapeutic approaches. The spectrum of upcoming immunotherapies that more specifically address distinct targets of the main immunological players in MG pathogenesis includes T-cell directed monoclonal antibodies that block the intracellular cascade associated with T-cell activation, monoclonal antibodies directed against key B-cell molecules, as well as monoclonal antibodies against the fragment crystallizable neonatal receptor (FcRn), cytokines and transmigration molecules, and also drugs that inhibit distinct elements of the complement system activated by the pathogenic MG antibodies. The review gives an overview on new drugs being evaluated in still ongoing or recently finished controlled clinical trials and drugs of potential benefit in MG due to their mechanisms of action and positive effects in other autoimmune disorders. Also, the challenges associated with the new therapeutic options are discussed briefly.

Update on Myositis Therapy: from Today's Standards to Tomorrow's Possibilities

Inflammatory myopathies, in short, myositis, are heterogeneous disorders that are characterized by inflammation of skeletal muscle and weakness of arms and legs. Research over the past few years has led to a new understanding regarding the pathogenesis of myositis. The new insights include different pathways of the innate and adaptive immune response during the pathogenesis of myositis. The importance of non-inflammatory mechanisms such as cell stress and impaired autophagy has been recently described. New target-specific drugs for myositis have been developed and are currently being tested in clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action of pharmacological standards in myositis and provide an outlook of future treatment approaches.

Update on Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Neurology: Modulating Neuro-autoimmunity, Evolving Factors on Efficacy and Dosing and Challenges on Stopping Chronic IVIg Therapy

In the last 25 years, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has had a major impact in the successful treatment of previously untreatable or poorly controlled autoimmune neurological disorders. Derived from thousands of healthy donors, IVIg contains IgG1 isotypes of idiotypic antibodies that have the potential to bind pathogenic autoantibodies or cross-react with various antigenic peptides, including proteins conserved among the "common cold"-pre-pandemic coronaviruses; as a result, after IVIg infusions, some of the patients' sera may transiently become positive for various neuronal antibodies, even for anti-SARS-CoV-2, necessitating caution in separating antibodies derived from the infused IVIg or acquired humoral immunity. IVIg exerts multiple effects on the immunoregulatory network by variably affecting autoantibodies, complement activation, FcRn saturation, FcγRIIb receptors, cytokines, and inflammatory mediators. Based on randomized controlled trials, IVIg is approved for the treatment of GBS, CIDP, MMN and dermatomyositis; has been effective in, myasthenia gravis exacerbations, and stiff-person syndrome; and exhibits convincing efficacy in autoimmune epilepsy, neuromyelitis, and autoimmune encephalitis. Recent evidence suggests that polymorphisms in the genes encoding FcRn and FcγRIIB may influence the catabolism of infused IgG or its anti-inflammatory effects, impacting on individualized dosing or efficacy. For chronic maintenance therapy, IVIg and subcutaneous IgG are effective in controlled studies only in CIDP and MMN preventing relapses and axonal loss up to 48 weeks; in practice, however, IVIg is continuously used for years in all the aforementioned neurological conditions, like is a "forever necessary therapy" for maintaining stability, generating challenges on when and how to stop it. Because about 35-40% of patients on chronic therapy do not exhibit objective neurological signs of worsening after stopping IVIg but express subjective symptoms of fatigue, pains, spasms, or a feeling of generalized weakness, a conditioning effect combined with fear that discontinuing chronic therapy may destabilize a multi-year stability status is likely. The dilemmas of continuing chronic therapy, the importance of adjusting dosing and scheduling or periodically stopping IVIg to objectively assess necessity, and concerns in accurately interpreting IVIg-dependency are discussed. Finally, the merit of subcutaneous IgG, the ineffectiveness of IVIg in IgG4-neurological autoimmunities, and genetic factors affecting IVIg dosing and efficacy are addressed.

Progress in the therapy of myasthenia gravis: getting closer to effective targeted immunotherapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on immunomodulating and immunosuppressive therapies in myasthenia gravis and highlight newly approved, or pending approval, therapies with new biologics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preoperative IVIg is not needed to prevent myasthenic crisis in stable myasthenia gravis patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia, based on controlled data. Rituximab, if initiated early in new-onset myasthenia gravis, can lead to faster and more sustained remission even without immunotherapies in 35% of patients at 2 years. Biomarkers determining the timing for follow-up infusions in Rituximab-responding AChR-positive patients are discussed. Most patients with MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis treated with Rituximab have sustained long-term remission with persistent reduction of IgG4 anti-MuSK antibodies. Eculizumb in the extension REGAIN study showed sustained long-term pharmacological remissions and reduced exacerbations. Three new biologic agents showed promising results in phase-II controlled myasthenia gravis trials: Zilucoplan, a subcutaneous macrocyclic peptide inhibiting complement C5; Efgartigimod, an IgG1-derived Fc fragment binding to neonatal FcRn receptor; and Rozanolixizumab, a high-affinity anti-FcRn monoclonal antibody. Finally, the safety of ongoing myasthenia gravis immunotherapies during COVID19 pandemic is discussed.

SUMMARY

New biologics against B cells, complement and FcRn receptor, are bringing us closer to successful targeted immunotherapies in the chronic management of myasthenia gravis promising an exciting future for antibody-mediated neurological diseases.

Practical Aspects of Transitioning from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Neuromuscular Disorders

Recent evidence shows that subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is as efficacious as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and has a better safety profile and acceptance rate among patients with neuromuscular disorders who require maintenance IVIG treatment. Awareness of the practical aspects of patient selection, enrollment, dose calculation, administration, and follow-up would help physicians coordinate a smooth and seamless transition from IVIG to SCIG. SCIG is ideally offered to patients having intolerable side effects during IVIG or wearing-off effect and in those keen for treatment autonomy. The weekly dose of SCIG is calculated by multiplying the maintenance dose of IVIG by the dose adjustment factor and dividing by the interval between IVIG in weeks and is initiated 1 week after the last dose of IVIG. The physician places the order for the SCIG and the clinic nurse or the physician refers the patient to the home care nursing program for further education and training. The necessary supplies are dispatched to the patient who would also collect the SCIG from the transfusion center of the nearest hospital. The patient is educated on assembling and administering the infusion, and home visits are continued until the patient or caregiver is confident. Regular follow-up with the patient is maintained to assess treatment response and side effects if any. With a smooth transition, most patients have excellent tolerance to SCIG and in our experience seldom request switching back to IVIG. Transitioning patients from IVIG to SCIG offers several advantages and thus, in general, is preferable for multiple stakeholders.

Chronic immunoglobulin maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Long-term treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) includes symptomatic and course-modifying therapies that target the immune system. Recently, both intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) have emerged as viable options for chronic therapy, considering the favourable safety-efficacy profile and possible immunosuppressant sparing properties. The aim was to investigate the outcomes of the long-term care of generalized MG with immunoglobulin (Ig).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, repeated-measures design study. Charts of generalized MG patients, treated with IVIG/SCIG for at least 6 months, from January 2015 to January 2020, were analysed. The primary outcome was the mean change in Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) after treatment with Ig, comparing baseline to IVIG and SCIG treatment periods. Secondary outcomes included the changes in pyridostigmine, immunosuppressive medications and patient-reported outcome 'percentage of normal' (0%-100%).

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were treated with chronic Ig therapy (30 IVIG/SCIG, three SCIG, one IVIG). The mean durations of IVIG and SCIG periods were 21.8 ± 19.4 (range 3-64) months and 19.5 ± 11.3 (range 5-45) months respectively. There was a significant reduction in MGII scores (27.7 ± 15.7 baseline; 22.0 ± 17.4 IVIG period; 19.5 ± 18.1 SCIG period; F = 17.9; d.f. = 1.7; P < 0.01), pyridostigmine and immunosuppressant use (P = 0.00). The outcome 'percentage of normal' had a significant positive association with both treatments (P = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest that patients can be successfully transitioned to IVIG and from IVIG to SCIG in the chronic treatment of generalized MG with reductions in impairments and use of other medications and improvement in overall status with Ig therapy. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to clarify costs and comparative effectiveness.

Pharmacodynamic Properties of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in Myasthenia Gravis: Sub-analyses From an Open-Label Trial

Background: We previously reported an open-label prospective trial of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in mild to moderate exacerbations of myasthenia gravis (MG). The effective dose of SCIg in MG and whether measured immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels correlated with measures of disease burden were not reported.

Objectives: To understand the relationship between SCIg dosing and serum IgG levels on measures of disease burden: quantitative MG (QMG), MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL), MG composite (MGC), and manual muscle testing (MMT) scores.

Methods: We performed post-hoc analyses of variance to assess change in oculobulbar and generalized sub-scores. We assessed the improvement in QMG, MG-ADL, MGC, or MMT over intervals from baseline to week 2, weeks 2–4, and week 4 to end of study. Improvement was either greater than (coded 1) or was equal to or less than (coded 0) the previous 2 weeks. Binaries were assessed in binary logistic regression as a function of SCIg dose over the two-week interval as the independent variable. We also performed linear regression analyses with change in the clinical scores as the dependent variable and change in IgG level over the entire study period and over the interval from weeks 2 to 4, during which change in IgG level was maximal, as the independent variables.

Results: Subanalysis of QMG and MG-ADL scores demonstrated significant reductions in the oculobulbar and the generalized portions of both measures. Binary logistic regression analyses did not find any statistically significant correlations between the odds of improvement and weight-adjusted dose of SCIg over 2-week intervals. There were no significant relationships between changes in scores and IgG level over the entire study period or over the interval from weeks 2 to 4.

Conclusions: Although SCIg dose varied over the study period, the odds of improvement were not significantly correlated with this, which suggests that the current dose of 2 g/kg for SCIg should be compared to different, possibly lower, dosing regimens head-to-head. The change in clinical scores was not significantly associated with IgG levels suggesting a complex relationship. SCIg may be effective for both ocular and generalized presentations of MG.

Expanding the Role of the Pharmacist: Immunoglobulin Therapy and Disease Management in Neuromuscular Disorders

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is a commonly used treatment for chronic neuromuscular disorders (NMDs), such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy. IgG therapy has also shown promise in treating other NMDs including myasthenia gravis, polymyositis, and dermatomyositis. IgG is administered as either intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg), with SCIg use becoming more popular due to the treatment burden associated with IVIg. IVIg requires regular venous access; long infusions (typically 4-6 hours); and can result in systemic adverse events (AEs) for some patients. In contrast, SCIg can be self-administered at home with shorter infusions (approximately 1 hour) and fewer systemic AEs. As patient care shifts toward home-based settings, the role of the pharmacist is paramount in providing a continuation of care and acting as the bridge between patient and clinic. Pharmacists with a good understanding of current recommendations, dosing strategies, and administration routes for IgG therapy are best placed to support patients. The aims of this review are to highlight the evidence supporting IgG therapy in the treatment of NMDs and provide practical information on patient management and IVIg/SCIg dosing in order to guide pharmacists on optimizing clinical outcomes and patient care.

Novel Treatments in Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the prototypical autoimmune disorder caused by specific autoantibodies at the neuromuscular junction. Broad-based immunotherapies, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine, have been effective in controlling symptoms of myasthenia. While being effective in a majority of MG patients many of these immunosuppressive agents are associated with long-term side effects, often intolerable for patients, and take several months to be effective. With advances in translational research and drug development capabilities, more directed therapeutic agents that can alter the future of MG treatment have been developed. This review focuses on the aberrant immunological processes in MG, the novel agents that target them along with the clinical evidence for efficacy and safety. These agents include terminal complement C5 inhibitors, Fc receptor inhibitors, B cell depleting agents (anti CD 19 and 20 and B cell activating factor [BAFF)]inhibitors), proteosome inhibitors, T cells and cytokine based therapies (chimeric antigen receptor T [CART-T] cell therapy), autologous stem cell transplantation, and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). Most of these new agents have advantages over conventional immunosuppressive treatment (IST) for MG therapy in terms of faster onset of action, favourable side effect profile and the potential for a sustained and long-term remission.

Update on immune-mediated therapies for myasthenia gravis

With the exception of thymectomy, immune modulatory treatment strategies and clinical trials in myasthenia gravis over the past 50 y were mainly borrowed from experience in other nonneurologic autoimmune disorders. The current experimental therapy paradigm has significantly changed such that treatments directed against the pathological mechanisms specific to myasthenia gravis are being tested, in some cases as the initial disease indication. Key advances have been made in three areas: (i) the expanded role and long-term benefits of thymectomy, (ii) complement inhibition to prevent antibody-mediated postsynaptic membrane damage, and (iii) neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition as in vivo apheresis, removing pathogenic antibodies. Herein, we discuss these advances and the potential for these newer therapies to significantly influence the current treatment paradigms. While these therapies provide exciting new options with rapid efficacy, there are anticipated challenges to their use, especially in terms of a dramatic increase in cost of care for some patients with myasthenia gravis.

Immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis in the era of biologics

No consensus has been reached on the ideal therapeutic algorithm for myasthenia gravis (MG). Most patients with MG require induction therapy with high doses of corticosteroids and maintenance with an immunosuppressant. Severe cases and acute worsening require intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis before oral immunosuppressants start having an effect. However, biologics are emerging as important therapeutic tools that promise to provide better corticosteroid sparing effects than standard treatments and can even induce remission. In particular, eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody against complement C5, has been approved by the FDA for refractory MG on the basis of a phase III trial. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that depletes peripheral B cells, has also been effective in many large uncontrolled series, although was not in a small phase III trial. Whether the newer anti-CD20 agents ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, ublituximab or inebilizumab will be more effective remains unclear. Belimumab, an antibody against the B cell trophic factor BAFF, was ineffective in phase III trials, and efgartigimod, which depletes antibodies, was effective in a phase II study. Some anti-cytokine agents relevant to MG immunopathogenesis also seem promising. Checkpoint inhibitors can trigger MG in some patients, necessitating early intervention. Increased availability of new biologics provides targeted immunotherapies and the opportunities to develop more specific therapies.

Maintenance immunosuppression in myasthenia gravis, an update

Therapies for myasthenia gravis (MG) include symptomatic and immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory treatment. Options for immunosuppression include corticosteroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, eculizumab, intravenous immunoglobulin, subcutaneous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and thymectomy. The practical aspects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy in MG are critically reviewed in this article. Application of one or more of these specific therapies is guided based on known efficacy, adverse effect profile, particular disease subtype and severity, and patient co-morbidities.

Immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies for neuromuscular diseases. Part II: New and novel agents

While traditional immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies remain the cornerstone of immune-mediated neuromuscular disease management, new and novel agents including antigen-specific, monoclonal antibody drugs, have emerged as important treatment options. This article is the second of a two-part series that reviews immune-based therapies in neuromuscular diseases. The first article provides an update on the use of traditional immune-based therapies such as corticosteroids, plasma exchange, steroid-sparing immunosuppressive drugs, and intravenous immunoglobulin G. This second article focuses on new and novel immune-based therapies, including eculizumab, a complement inhibitor approved for acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis; rituximab, a B-cell depletion therapy with evolving indications in neuromuscular diseases; and the subcutaneous formulation of immunoglobulin G that gained approval for use in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in 2018. Finally, several novel antigen-specific drugs at different stages of investigation in neuromuscular disease are also reviewed.

Current pharmacotherapeutic options for myasthenia gravis

Introduction: Novel options for immune-based therapy in myasthenia gravis are improving the therapeutic outlook for patients. Multiple clinical trials on immunomodulation, complement inhibitors, and FcR inhibitors are providing evidence for novel immune-based therapies that promise to improve outcomes in myasthenia patients. These more focused immune treatments are reviewed in this paper.Areas covered: This paper outlines classical treatment for myasthenia gravis and then reviews recent clinical trial evidence for novel immune therapies, particularly complement inhibitors and FcR inhibitors. Further, as immune therapies expand in other areas of medicine, such as oncology, iatrogenic myasthenia is being observed as a complication of some novel treatments.Expert opinion: Exciting new options to help patients with myasthenia gravis are now available or in phase 3 trials based on promising phase 2 results. Manipulation of the immune system can also lead to iatrogenic MG. Although novel treatments can improve care for myasthenia gravis patients, future developments that prevent the production of specific abnormal auto-antibodies are desirable.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in Neurologic Diseases

PURPOSE

IV immunoglobulin (Ig) therapy has been widely used for the treatment of neurologic disorders, autoimmune diseases, immunodeficiency-related diseases, blood system diseases, and cancers. In this review, we summarize the efficacy and tolerability of IVIg and SCIg therapy in neurologic diseases.

METHODS

We summarized and analyzed the efficacy and tolerability of IVIg and SCIg in neurologic diseases, by analyzing the literature pertaining to the use of IVIg and SCIg to treat nervous system diseases.

FINDINGS

In clinical neurology practice, IVIg has been shown to be useful for the treatment of new-onset or recurrent immune diseases and for long-term maintenance treatment of chronic diseases. Moreover, IVIg may have applications in the management of intractable autoimmune epilepsy, paraneoplastic syndrome, autoimmune encephalitis, and neuromyelitis optica. SCIg is emerging as an alternative to IVIg treatment. Although SCIg has a composition similar to that of IVIg, the applications of this therapy are different. Notably, the bioavailability of SCIg is lower than that of IVIg, but the homeostasis level is more stable. Current studies have shown that these 2 therapies have pharmacodynamic equivalence.

IMPLICATIONS

In this review, we explored the efficacy of IVIg in the treatment of various neurologic disorders. IVIg administration still faces many challenges. Thus, it will be necessary to standardize the use of IVIg in the clinical setting. SCIg administration is a novel and feasible treatment option for neurologic and immune-related diseases, such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. As our understanding of the mechanisms of action of IVIg improve, potential next-generation biologics can being developed.

Myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) or other AChR-related proteins in the postsynaptic muscle membrane. Localized or general muscle weakness is the predominant symptom and is induced by the antibodies. Patients are grouped according to the presence of antibodies, symptoms, age at onset and thymus pathology. Diagnosis is straightforward in most patients with typical symptoms and a positive antibody test, although a detailed clinical and neurophysiological examination is important in antibody-negative patients. MG therapy should be ambitious and aim for clinical remission or only mild symptoms with near-normal function and quality of life. Treatment should be based on MG subgroup and includes symptomatic treatment using acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, thymectomy and immunotherapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange are fast-acting treatments used for disease exacerbations, and intensive care is necessary during exacerbations with respiratory failure. Comorbidity is frequent, particularly in elderly patients. Active physical training should be encouraged.

Sensitivity of MG-ADL for generalized weakness in myasthenia gravis

Background and purpose

Myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG‐ADL) is a commonly used questionnaire in MG trials. To investigate whether MG‐ADL is equally sensitive to oculobulbar and generalized weakness, its correlation with the oculobulbar and generalized domain of the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score was analyzed (QMGob and QMGgen, respectively). To test whether the sensitivity of MG‐ADL for generalized weakness could be improved, the additional value of ACTIVLIM on top of MG‐ADL in the prediction QMGgen in was investigated.

Methods

MG‐ADL, QMG and ACTIVLIM, an ADL questionnaire focusing on generalized weakness, were analyzed in a prospective cohort of 112 MG patients. A generalized linear model was used to calculate the correlation of MG‐ADL with QMGob and QMGgen and to assess the additional value of ACTIVLIM on top of MG‐ADL for its correlation with QMGgen.

Results

MG‐ADL had a higher correlation with QMGob than with QMGgen (B = 0.68, P < 0.001, and B = 0.38, P < 0.001, respectively). A similar trend was found for changes in the scores (B = 0.68, P = 0.132, and B = 0.39, P = 0.492, respectively). ACTIVLIM had a significant additional value on top of MG‐ADL in the prediction of QMGgen, both cross‐sectionally (B = −0.61, P < 0.001) and for changes within individual patients (B = −0.93, P = 0.041).

Conclusion

MG‐ADL has a lower sensitivity for generalized weakness than for oculobulbar weakness. Adding questions on generalized weakness would improve the sensitivity of the MG‐ADL for generalized weakness.

What is in the Neuromuscular Junction Literature?

This update begins with myasthenia gravis and the roles of anti-agrin and cortactin antibodies. Regarding diagnosis, a report on repeated ice pack testing is highlighted as are several reports on the close correlation of electrodiagnostic testing with clinical features and the response to treatment. The incidence of head drop and associated clinical and ventilatory features are gleaned from a retrospective study. We also discuss a study that assessed the predominantly symmetric and conjugate ocular findings in MuSK-myasthenia gravis. Other topics that are covered include quality of life and preoperative risk. We then summarize the positive treatment trials of subcutaneous immunoglobulin and eculizumab. Turning to Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome, we report on an epidemiologic study performed on the veteran affairs population, the results of the DAPPER study of 3, 4 diaminopyridine, and look to the future for other treatment options involving calcium gating modifiers.

Adverse Effects of Immunoglobulin Therapy

Immunoglobulin has been widely used in a variety of diseases, including primary and secondary immunodeficiency diseases, neuromuscular diseases, and Kawasaki disease. Although a large number of clinical trials have demonstrated that immunoglobulin is effective and well tolerated, various adverse effects have been reported. The majority of these events, such as flushing, headache, malaise, fever, chills, fatigue and lethargy, are transient and mild. However, some rare side effects, including renal impairment, thrombosis, arrhythmia, aseptic meningitis, hemolytic anemia, and transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), are serious. These adverse effects are associated with specific immunoglobulin preparations and individual differences. Performing an early assessment of risk factors, infusing at a slow rate, premedicating, and switching from intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) can minimize these adverse effects. Adverse effects are rarely disabling or fatal, treatment mainly involves supportive measures, and the majority of affected patients have a good prognosis.