Multimodal nocturnal seizure detection in a residential care setting: A long-term prospective trial

Deep learning-based detection of generalized convulsive seizures using a wrist-worn accelerometer

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a wrist-worn accelerometer-based, deep-learning tunable algorithm for the automated detection of generalized or bilateral convulsive seizures (CSs) to be integrated with off-the-shelf smartwatches.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective multi-center study across eight European epilepsy monitoring units, collecting data from 384 patients undergoing video electroencephalography (vEEG) monitoring with a wrist-worn three dimensional (3D)-accelerometer sensor. We developed an ensemble-based convolutional neural network architecture with tunable sensitivity through quantile-based aggregation. The model, referred to as Episave, used accelerometer amplitude as input. It was trained on data from 37 patients who had 54 CSs and evaluated on an independent dataset comprising 347 patients, including 33 who had 49 CSs.

RESULTS

Cross-validation on the training set showed that optimal performance was obtained with an aggregation quantile of 60, with a 98% sensitivity, and a false alarm rate (FAR) of 1/6 days. Using this quantile on the independent test set, the model achieved a 96% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90%-100%), a FAR of <1/8 days (95% CI: 1/9-1/7 days) with 1 FA/61 nights, and a median detection latency of 26 s. One of the two missed CSs could be explained by the patient's arm, which was wearing the sensor, being trapped in the bed rail. Other quantiles provided up to 100% sensitivity at the cost of a greater FAR (1/2 days) or very low FAR (1/100 days) at the cost of lower sensitivity (86%).

SIGNIFICANCE

This Phase 2 clinical validation study suggests that deep learning techniques applied to single-sensor accelerometer data can achieve high CS detection performance while enabling tunable sensitivity.

Use of Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Edge Intelligence in Long-Term Care for Older People: Comprehensive Analysis Through Bibliometric, Google Trends, and Content Analysis

BACKGROUND

The global aging population poses critical challenges for long-term care (LTC), including workforce shortages, escalating health care costs, and increasing demand for high-quality care. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and edge intelligence (EI) offers transformative potential to enhance care quality, improve safety, and streamline operations. However, existing research lacks a comprehensive analysis that synthesizes academic trends, public interest, and deeper insights regarding these technologies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide a holistic overview of AI, IoT, and EI applications in LTC for older adults through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis, public interest insights from Google Trends, and content analysis of the top-cited research papers.

METHODS

Bibliometric analysis was conducted using data from Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus to identify key themes and trends in the field, while Google Trends was used to assess public interest. A content analysis of the top 1% of most-cited papers provided deeper insights into practical applications.

RESULTS

A total of 6378 papers published between 2014 and 2023 were analyzed. The bibliometric analysis revealed that the United States, China, and Canada are leading contributors, with strong thematic overlaps in areas such as dementia care, machine learning, and wearable health monitoring technologies. High correlations were found between academic and public interest, in key topics such as "long-term care" (τ=0.89, P<.001) and "caregiver" (τ=0.72, P=.004). The content analysis demonstrated that social robots, particularly PARO, significantly improved mood and reduced agitation in patients with dementia. However, limitations, including small sample sizes, short study durations, and a narrow focus on dementia care, were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

AI, IoT, and EI collectively form a powerful ecosystem in LTC settings, addressing different aspects of care for older adults. Our study suggests that increased international collaboration and the integration of emerging themes such as "rehabilitation," "stroke," and "mHealth" are necessary to meet the evolving care needs of this population. Additionally, incorporating high-interest keywords such as "machine learning," "smart home," and "caregiver" can enhance discoverability and relevance for both academic and public audiences. Future research should focus on expanding sample sizes, conducting long-term multicenter trials, and exploring broader health conditions beyond dementia, such as frailty and depression.

Surgical Treatments, Devices, and Nonmedical Management of Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Many patients with epilepsy are unable to achieve optimal seizure control with medical therapy. This article focuses on surgical approaches, dietary therapies, and seizure detection devices.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

For more than a century, resective epilepsy surgery has been a treatment option for some patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Other surgical options have emerged for patients for whom resection is not possible or is associated with unacceptable risks, including minimally invasive epilepsy surgery and neurostimulation therapies. Dietary therapies, such as the ketogenic diet, can also help improve seizure control, especially in children. For patients with ongoing nocturnal convulsive seizures, seizure detection devices can alert caregivers and potentially reduce the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy should be referred to comprehensive epilepsy centers to determine if they qualify for nonpharmacologic treatment options to reduce the risk of seizures and premature death and improve quality of life.

Wearable sensors in paediatric neurology

Wearable sensors have the potential to transform diagnosis, monitoring, and management of children who have neurological conditions. Traditional methods for assessing neurological disorders rely on clinical scales and subjective measures. The snapshot of the disease progression at a particular time point, lack of cooperation by the children during assessments, and susceptibility to bias limit the utility of these measures. Wearable sensors, which capture data continuously in natural settings, offer a non-invasive and objective alternative to traditional methods. This review examines the role of wearable sensors in various paediatric neurological conditions, including cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, as well as Rett syndrome, Down syndrome, Angelman syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, neuromuscular disorders such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy, ataxia, Gaucher disease, headaches, and sleep disorders. The review highlights their application in tracking motor function, seizure activity, and daily movement patterns to gain insights into disease progression and therapeutic response. Although challenges related to population size, compliance, ethics, and regulatory approval remain, wearable technology promises to improve clinical trials and outcomes for patients in paediatric neurology.

Users´ perspectives and preferences on using wearables in epilepsy: A critical review

Seizure detection devices (SDDs) offer promising technological advancements in epilepsy management, providing real-time seizure monitoring and alerts for patients and caregivers. This critical review explores user perspectives and experiences with SDDs to better understand factors influencing their adoption and sustained use. An electronic literature search identified 34 relevant studies addressing common themes such as usability, motivation, comfort, accuracy, barriers, and the financial burden of these devices. Usability emerged as the most frequently discussed factor, with patients and caregivers also emphasizing the importance of ease of use, long battery life, and waterproof design. Although validated devices showed high user satisfaction, technical challenges, false negatives, and false positives need much improvement. Motivation to use SDDs was driven by enhanced safety, symptom tracking, and health care professional recommendations. Comfort and wearability were also critical aspects, with users favoring lightweight, breathable, and discreet designs for long-term wear. Users reported the devices as "comfortable" and preferring wrist or arm-worn devices for the long term. Accuracy-particularly minimizing false positives and false negatives-was a priority for users. Barriers to adoption included device cost, limited insurance reimbursement, discomfort, and concerns about data privacy. Despite these challenges, many users were willing to use SDDs. Recommendations from health care professionals significantly increased user motivation. This review highlights the need for SDD designs that address user concerns regarding usability, comfort, looks, and accuracy, while also reducing financial and technical barriers. Enhancing clinical involvement and tailoring devices to specific patient needs may be crucial to promoting wider SDD adoption. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of SDDs on quality of life and to explore ways to mitigate challenges in long-term use.

Seizure Detection Devices

Goals of automated detection of epileptic seizures using wearable devices include objective documentation of seizures, prevention of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and seizure-related injuries, obviating both the unpredictability of seizures and potential social embarrassment, and finally to develop seizure-triggered on-demand therapies. Automated seizure detection devices are based on the analysis of EEG signals (scalp-EEG, subcutaneous EEG and intracranial EEG), of motor manifestations of seizures (surface EMG, accelerometry), and of physiologic autonomic changes caused by seizures (heart and respiration rate, oxygen saturation, sweat secretion, body temperature). While the detection of generalized tonic-clonic and of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures can be achieved with high sensitivity and low false alarm rates, the detection of focal seizures is still suboptimal, especially in the everyday ambulatory setting. Multimodal seizure detection devices in general provide better performance than devices based on single measurement parameters. Long-term use of seizure detection devices in home environments helps to improve the accuracy of seizure diaries and to reduce seizure-related injuries, while evidence for prevention of SUDEP is still lacking. Automated seizure detection devices are generally well accepted by patients and caregivers.

Movement Disorders and Smart Wrist Devices: A Comprehensive Study

In the medical field, there are several very different movement disorders, such as tremors, Parkinson's disease, or Huntington's disease. A wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms characterizes them. It is evident that in the modern era, the use of smart wrist devices, such as smartwatches, wristbands, and smart bracelets is spreading among all categories of people. This diffusion is justified by the limited costs, ease of use, and less invasiveness (and consequently greater acceptability) than other types of sensors used for health status monitoring. This systematic review aims to synthesize research studies using smart wrist devices for a specific class of movement disorders. Following PRISMA-S guidelines, 130 studies were selected and analyzed. For each selected study, information is provided relating to the smartwatch/wristband/bracelet model used (whether it is commercial or not), the number of end-users involved in the experimentation stage, and finally the characteristics of the benchmark dataset possibly used for testing. Moreover, some articles also reported the type of raw data extracted from the smart wrist device, the implemented designed algorithmic pipeline, and the data classification methodology. It turned out that most of the studies have been published in the last ten years, showing a growing interest in the scientific community. The selected articles mainly investigate the relationship between smart wrist devices and Parkinson's disease. Epilepsy and seizure detection are also research topics of interest, while there are few papers analyzing gait disorders, Huntington's Disease, ataxia, or Tourette Syndrome. However, the results of this review highlight the difficulties still present in the use of the smartwatch/wristband/bracelet for the identified categories of movement disorders, despite the advantages these technologies could bring in the dissemination of low-cost solutions usable directly within living environments and without the need for caregivers or medical personnel.

Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Epilepsy Detection: Balancing Effectiveness With Ethical Considerations for Welfare

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Epilepsy is a major neurological challenge, especially for pediatric populations. It profoundly impacts both developmental progress and quality of life in affected children. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), there's a growing interest in leveraging its capabilities to improve the diagnosis and management of pediatric epilepsy. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of AI in pediatric epilepsy detection while considering the ethical implications surrounding its implementation.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive systematic review was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Medline. Search terms encompassed "pediatric epilepsy," "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," "ethical considerations," and "data security." Publications from the past decade were scrutinized for methodological rigor, with a focus on studies evaluating AI's efficacy in pediatric epilepsy detection and management.

RESULTS

AI systems have demonstrated strong potential in diagnosing and monitoring pediatric epilepsy, often matching clinical accuracy. For example, AI-driven decision support achieved 93.4% accuracy in diagnosis, closely aligning with expert assessments. Specific methods, like EEG-based AI for detecting interictal discharges, showed high specificity (93.33%-96.67%) and sensitivity (76.67%-93.33%), while neuroimaging approaches using rs-fMRI and DTI reached up to 97.5% accuracy in identifying microstructural abnormalities. Deep learning models, such as CNN-LSTM, have also enhanced seizure detection from video by capturing subtle movement and expression cues. Non-EEG sensor-based methods effectively identified nocturnal seizures, offering promising support for pediatric care. However, ethical considerations around privacy, data security, and model bias remain crucial for responsible AI integration.

CONCLUSION

While AI holds immense potential to enhance pediatric epilepsy management, ethical considerations surrounding transparency, fairness, and data security must be rigorously addressed. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders are imperative to navigate these ethical challenges effectively, ensuring responsible AI integration and optimizing patient outcomes in pediatric epilepsy care.

Effects of epileptic seizures on the quality of biosignals recorded from wearables

OBJECTIVE

Wearable nonelectroencephalographic biosignal recordings captured from the wrist offer enormous potential for seizure monitoring. However, signal quality remains a challenging factor affecting data reliability. Models trained for seizure detection depend on the quality of recordings in peri-ictal periods in performing a feature-based separation of ictal periods from interictal periods. Thus, this study aims to investigate the effect of epileptic seizures on signal quality, ensuring accurate and reliable monitoring.

METHODS

This study assesses the signal quality of wearable data during peri-ictal phases of generalized tonic-clonic and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (TCS), focal motor seizures (FMS), and focal nonmotor seizures (FNMS). We evaluated accelerometer (ACC) activity and the signal quality of electrodermal activity (EDA) and blood volume pulse (BVP) data. Additionally, we analyzed the influence of peri-ictal movements as assessed by ACC (ACC activity) on signal quality and examined intraictal subphases of focal to bilateral TCS.

RESULTS

We analyzed 386 seizures from 111 individuals in three international epilepsy monitoring units. BVP signal quality and ACC activity levels differed between all seizure types. We found the largest decrease in BVP signal quality and increase in ACC activity when comparing the ictal phase to the pre- and postictal phases for TCS. Additionally, ACC activity was strongly negatively correlated with BVP signal quality for TCS and FMS, and weakly for FNMS. Intraictal analysis revealed that tonic and clonic subphases have the lowest BVP signal quality and the highest ACC activity.

SIGNIFICANCE

Motor elements of seizures significantly impair BVP signal quality, but do not have significant effect on EDA signal quality, as assessed by wrist-worn wearables. The results underscore the importance of signal quality assessment methods and careful selection of robust modalities to ensure reliable seizure detection. Future research is needed to explain whether seizure detection models' decisions are based on signal responses induced by physiological processes as opposed to artifacts.

Towards user-centered design of medical devices for SUDEP prediction and prevention: Insights from persons with epilepsy and caregivers

OBJECTIVES

As epilepsy management medical devices emerge as potential technological solutions for prediction and prevention of sudden death in epilepsy (SUDEP), there is a gap in understanding the features and priorities that should be included in the design of these devices. This study aims to bridge the gap between current technology and emerging needs by leveraging insights from persons with epilepsy (PWE) and caregivers (CG) on current epilepsy management devices and understanding how SUDEP awareness influences preferences and design considerations for potential future solutions.

METHODS

Two cross-sectional surveys were designed to survey PWE and CG on medical device design features, SUDEP awareness, and participation in medical device research. Data analysis included both qualitative thematic analysis and quantitative statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The survey revealed that among 284 responses, CG were more aware of SUDEP than PWE. Comfort was identified as the primary concern regarding wearable medical devices for epilepsy management with significant differences between PWE and CG regarding acceptance and continuous use preferences. The thematic analysis identified integration with daily life, aesthetic and emotional resonance, adaptability to seizure characteristics, and user-centric design specifications as crucial factors to be considered for enhanced medical device adoption. The integration of a companion app is seen as an important tool to enhance communication and data sharing.

DISCUSSION

This study reveals that while SUDEP awareness can promote the development of future SUDEP predictive and preventive medical devices, these should be designed to mitigate its impact on daily life and anxiety of both PWE and CG. Comfort and acceptance are seen as key priorities to support continuous use and are seen as a technical requirement of future medical devices for SUDEP prediction and prevention. Widespread adoption requires these technologies to be customizable to adapt to different lifestyles and social situations. A holistic approach should be used in the design of future medical devices to capture several dimensions of PWE and CG epilepsy management journey and uphold communication between healthcare professionals, PWE and CG.

CONCLUSION

Data from this study highlight the importance of considering user preferences and experiences in the design of epilepsy management medical devices with potential applicability for SUDEP prediction and prevention. By employing user-centered design methods this research provides valuable insights to inform the development of future SUDEP prediction and prevention devices.

Human Factors, Human-Centered Design, and Usability of Sensor-Based Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Increasing adoption of sensor-based digital health technologies (sDHTs) in recent years has cast light on the many challenges in implementing these tools into clinical trials and patient care at scale across diverse patient populations; however, the methodological approaches taken toward sDHT usability evaluation have varied markedly.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to explore the current landscape of studies reporting data related to sDHT human factors, human-centered design, and usability, to inform our concurrent work on developing an evaluation framework for sDHT usability.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of studies published between 2013 and 2023 and indexed in PubMed, in which data related to sDHT human factors, human-centered design, and usability were reported. Following a systematic screening process, we extracted the study design, participant sample, the sDHT or sDHTs used, the methods of data capture, and the types of usability-related data captured.

RESULTS

Our literature search returned 442 papers, of which 85 papers were found to be eligible and 83 papers were available for data extraction and not under embargo. In total, 164 sDHTs were evaluated; 141 (86%) sDHTs were wearable tools while the remaining 23 (14%) sDHTs were ambient tools. The majority of studies (55/83, 66%) reported summative evaluations of final-design sDHTs. Almost all studies (82/83, 99%) captured data from targeted end users, but only 18 (22%) out of 83 studies captured data from additional users such as care partners or clinicians. User satisfaction and ease of use were evaluated for 83% (136/164) and 91% (150/164) of sDHTs, respectively; however, learnability, efficiency, and memorability were reported for only 11 (7%), 4 (2%), and 2 (1%) out of 164 sDHTs, respectively. A total of 14 (9%) out of 164 sDHTs were evaluated according to the extent to which users were able to understand the clinical data or other information presented to them (understandability) or the actions or tasks they should complete in response (actionability). Notable gaps in reporting included the absence of a sample size rationale (reported for 21/83, 25% of all studies and 17/55, 31% of summative studies) and incomplete sociodemographic descriptive data (complete age, sex/gender, and race/ethnicity reported for 14/83, 17% of studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, we suggest four actionable recommendations for future studies that will help to advance the implementation of sDHTs: (1) consider an in-depth assessment of technology usability beyond user satisfaction and ease of use, (2) expand recruitment to include important user groups such as clinicians and care partners, (3) report the rationale for key study design considerations including the sample size, and (4) provide rich descriptive statistics regarding the study sample to allow a complete understanding of generalizability to other patient populations and contexts of use.

Update review on SUDEP: Risk assessment, background & seizure detection devices

This review focusses on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy patients (SUDEP) and incorporates risk stratification (through SUDEP risk factors and SUDEP risk scores), hypotheses on the mechanism of SUDEP and eligible seizure detection devices (SDDs) for further SUDEP prevention studies. The main risk factors for SUDEP are the presence and the frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTC). In Swedish population-based case control study, the Odds ratio of the presence of GTC in the absence of bedroom sharing is 67. SUDEP risk scoring systems express a score that represents the cumulative presence of SUDEP risk factors, but not the exact effect of their combination. We describe 4 of the available scoring systems: SUDEP-7 inventory, SUDEP-3 inventory, SUDEP-ClinicAl Risk scorE (SUDEP-CARE score) and Kempenhaeghe SUDEP risk score. Although they all include GTC, their design is often different. Three of 4 scoring systems were validated (SUDEP-7 inventory, SUDEP-3 inventory and SUDEP-CARE score). None of the available scoring systems has been sufficiently validated for the use in a general epilepsy population. Plausible mechanisms of SUDEP are discussed. In the MORTEMUS-study (Mortality in Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Study), SUDEP was a postictal cardiorespiratory arrest after a GTC. The parallel respiratory and cardiac dysfunction in SUDEP suggests a central dysfunction of the brainstem centers that are involved in the control of respiration and heart rhythm. In the (consequent) adenosine serotonin hypotheses SUDEP occurs when a postictal adenosine-mediated respiratory depression is not compensated by the effect of serotonin. Other (adjuvant) mechanisms and factors are discussed. Seizure detection devices (SDDs) may help to improve nocturnal supervision. Five SDDs have been validated in phase 3 studies for the detection of TC: Seizure Link®, Epi-Care®, NightWatch, Empatica, Nelli®. They have demonstrated a sensitivity of at least 90 % combined with an acceptable false positive alarm rate. It has not yet been proven that the use will actually lead to SUDEP prevention, but clinical experience supports their effectiveness.

Prospective multicenter study of continuous tonic-clonic seizure monitoring on Apple Watch in epilepsy monitoring units and ambulatory environments

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the performance of a custom application developed for tonic-clonic seizure (TCS) monitoring on a consumer-wearable (Apple Watch) device.

METHODS

Participants with a history of convulsive epileptic seizures were recruited for either Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) or ambulatory (AMB) monitoring; participants without epilepsy (normal controls [NC]) were also enrolled in the AMB group. Both EMU and AMB participants wore an Apple Watch with a research app that continuously recorded accelerometer and photoplethysmography (PPG) signals, and ran a fixed-and-frozen tonic-clonic seizure detection algorithm during the testing period. This algorithm had been previously developed and validated using a separate training dataset. All EMU convulsive events were validated by video-electroencephalography (video-EEG); AMB events were validated by caregiver reporting and follow-ups. Device performance was characterized and compared to prior monitoring devices through sensitivity, false alarm rate (FAR; false-alarms per 24 h), precision, and detection delay (latency).

RESULTS

The EMU group had 85 participants (4,279 h, 19 TCS from 15 participants) enrolled across four EMUs; the AMB group had 21 participants (13 outpatient, 8 NC, 6,735 h, 10 TCS from 3 participants). All but one AMB participant completed the study. Device performance in the EMU group included a sensitivity of 100 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 79-100 %]; an FAR of 0.05 [0.02, 0.08] per 24 h; a precision of 68 % [48 %, 83 %]; and a latency of 32.07 s [standard deviation (std) 10.22 s]. The AMB group had a sensitivity of 100 % [66-100 %]; an FAR of 0.13 [0.08, 0.24] per 24 h; a precision of 22 % [11 %, 37 %]; and a latency of 37.38 s [13.24 s]. Notably, a single AMB participant was responsible for 8 of 31 false alarms. The AMB FAR excluding this participant was 0.10 [0.07, 0.14] per 24 h.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates the practicability of TCS monitoring on a popular consumer wearable (Apple Watch) in daily use for people with epilepsy. The monitoring app had a high sensitivity and a substantially lower FAR than previously reported in both EMU and AMB environments.

Automated detection of tonic seizures using wearable movement sensor and artificial neural network

Although several validated wearable devices are available for detection of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, automated detection of tonic seizures is still a challenge. In this phase 1 study, we report development and validation of an artificial neural network (ANN) model for automated detection of tonic seizures with visible clinical manifestation using a wearable wristband movement sensor (accelerometer and gyroscope). The dataset prospectively recorded for this study included 70 tonic seizures from 15 patients (seven males, age 3-46 years, median = 19 years). We trained an ANN model to detect tonic seizures. The independent test dataset comprised nocturnal recordings, including 10 tonic seizures from three patients and additional (distractor) data from three subjects without seizures. The ANN model detected nocturnal tonic seizures with visible clinical manifestation with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval = 69%-100%) and with an average false alarm rate of .16/night. The mean detection latency was 14.1 s (median = 10 s), with a maximum of 47 s. These data suggest that nocturnal tonic seizures can be reliably detected with movement sensors using ANN. Large-scale, multicenter prospective (phase 3) trials are needed to provide compelling evidence for the clinical utility of this device and detection algorithm.

Performance, impact and experiences of using wearable devices for seizure detection in community-based settings: a mixed methods systematic review

Background

There is growing scientific evidence that wearable devices for seizure detection (WDD) perform well in controlled environments. However, their impact on the health and experience of patients with epilepsy (PWE) in community-based settings is less documented. We aimed to synthesize the scientific evidence about the performance of wearable devices used by PWE in community-based settings, and their impact on health outcomes and patient experience.

Methods

We performed a mixed methods systematic review. We performed searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Embase from inception until December 2022. Independent reviewers checked studies published in English for eligibility based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We collected information about studies, wearable devices, their performance, and their impact on health outcomes and patient experience. We used a narrative method to synthetize separately data for each question. We assessed the quality of included studies with the QUADAS-C and MMAT tools.

Results

On a total of 9,595 publications, 10 studies met our eligibility criteria. Study populations included mostly PWE who were young (≤18 years) and/or their caregivers. Participants were living at home in most studies. Accelerometer was the wearable device mostly used for seizure detection. Wearable device performance was high (sensitivity ≥80% and false alarm rate ≤1/day), but some concerns remained due to false alarms according to qualitative studies. There was no significant effect of wearable device on quality of life (QoL) measures and no study reported quantitatively other health outcomes. Qualitative studies reported positive effect of wearable devices on QoL, seizure management and seizure-related injuries. Overall, patients reported that the device, especially the accelerometer, was suitable, but when the device was too visible, they found it uncomfortable. Study quality was low to medium.

Conclusions

There is low quality scientific evidence supporting the performance of WDD in a home environment. Although qualitative findings support the positive impacts of wearable devices for patients and caregivers, more quantitative studies are needed to assess their impact on health outcomes such as QoL and seizure-related injuries.

The present and future of seizure detection, prediction, and forecasting with machine learning, including the future impact on clinical trials

Seizures have a profound impact on quality of life and mortality, in part because they can be challenging both to detect and forecast. Seizure detection relies upon accurately differentiating transient neurological symptoms caused by abnormal epileptiform activity from similar symptoms with different causes. Seizure forecasting aims to identify when a person has a high or low likelihood of seizure, which is related to seizure prediction. Machine learning and artificial intelligence are data-driven techniques integrated with neurodiagnostic monitoring technologies that attempt to accomplish both of those tasks. In this narrative review, we describe both the existing software and hardware approaches for seizure detection and forecasting, as well as the concepts for how to evaluate the performance of new technologies for future application in clinical practice. These technologies include long-term monitoring both with and without electroencephalography (EEG) that report very high sensitivity as well as reduced false positive detections. In addition, we describe the implications of seizure detection and forecasting upon the evaluation of novel treatments for seizures within clinical trials. Based on these existing data, long-term seizure detection and forecasting with machine learning and artificial intelligence could fundamentally change the clinical care of people with seizures, but there are multiple validation steps necessary to rigorously demonstrate their benefits and costs, relative to the current standard.

Autonomic biosignals, seizure detection, and forecasting

Wearable devices have attracted significant attention in epilepsy research in recent years for their potential to enhance patient care through improved seizure monitoring and forecasting. This narrative review presents a detailed overview of the current clinical state of the art while addressing how devices that assess autonomic nervous system (ANS) function reflect seizures and central nervous system (CNS) state changes. This includes a description of the interactions between the CNS and the ANS, including physiological and epilepsy-related changes affecting their dynamics. We first discuss technical aspects of measuring autonomic biosignals and considerations for using ANS sensors in clinical practice. We then review recent seizure detection and seizure forecasting studies, highlighting their performance and capability for seizure detection and forecasting using devices measuring ANS biomarkers. Finally, we address the field's challenges and provide an outlook for future developments.

Artificial intelligence/machine learning for epilepsy and seizure diagnosis

Accurate seizure and epilepsy diagnosis remains a challenging task due to the complexity and variability of manifestations, which can lead to delayed or missed diagnosis. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly developing field, with growing interest in integrating and applying these tools to aid clinicians facing diagnostic uncertainties. ML algorithms, particularly deep neural networks, are increasingly employed in interpreting electroencephalograms (EEG), neuroimaging, wearable data, and seizure videos. This review discusses the development and testing phases of AI/ML tools, emphasizing the importance of generalizability and interpretability in medical applications, and highlights recent publications that demonstrate the current and potential utility of AI to aid clinicians in diagnosing epilepsy. Current barriers of AI integration in patient care include dataset availability and heterogeneity, which limit studies' quality, interpretability, comparability, and generalizability. ML and AI offer substantial promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of epilepsy diagnosis. The growing availability of diverse datasets, enhanced processing speed, and ongoing efforts to standardize reporting contribute to the evolving landscape of AI applications in clinical care.

Ambulatory seizure detection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent advances in the field of seizure detection in ambulatory patients with epilepsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown that wrist or arm wearable sensors, using 3D-accelerometry, electrodermal activity or photoplethysmography, in isolation or in combination, can reliably detect focal-to-bilateral and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), with a sensitivity over 90%, and false alarm rates varying from 0.1 to 1.2 per day. A headband EEG has also demonstrated a high sensitivity for detecting and help monitoring generalized absence seizures. In contrast, no appropriate solution is yet available to detect focal seizures, though some promising findings were reported using ECG-based heart rate variability biomarkers and subcutaneous EEG.

SUMMARY

Several FDA and/or EU-certified solutions are available to detect GTCS and trigger an alarm with acceptable rates of false alarms. However, data are still missing regarding the impact of such intervention on patients' safety. Noninvasive solutions to reliably detect focal seizures in ambulatory patients, based on either EEG or non-EEG biosignals, remain to be developed. To this end, a number of challenges need to be addressed, including the performance, but also the transparency and interpretability of machine learning algorithms.

Minimum clinical utility standards for wearable seizure detectors: A simulation study

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy management employs self-reported seizure diaries, despite evidence of seizure underreporting. Wearable and implantable seizure detection devices are now becoming more widely available. There are no clear guidelines about what levels of accuracy are sufficient. This study aimed to simulate clinical use cases and identify the necessary level of accuracy for each.

METHODS

Using a realistic seizure simulator (CHOCOLATES), a ground truth was produced, which was then sampled to generate signals from simulated seizure detectors of various capabilities. Five use cases were evaluated: (1) randomized clinical trials (RCTs), (2) medication adjustment in clinic, (3) injury prevention, (4) sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) prevention, and (5) treatment of seizure clusters. We considered sensitivity (0%-100%), false alarm rate (FAR; 0-2/day), and device type (external wearable vs. implant) in each scenario.

RESULTS

The RCT case was efficient for a wide range of wearable parameters, though implantable devices were preferred. Lower accuracy wearables resulted in subtle changes in the distribution of patients enrolled in RCTs, and therefore higher sensitivity and lower FAR values were preferred. In the clinic case, a wide range of sensitivity, FAR, and device type yielded similar results. For injury prevention, SUDEP prevention, and seizure cluster treatment, each scenario required high sensitivity and yet was minimally influenced by FAR.

SIGNIFICANCE

The choice of use case is paramount in determining acceptable accuracy levels for a wearable seizure detection device. We offer simulation results for determining and verifying utility for specific use case and specific wearable parameters.

A systematic review of the literature reporting on remote monitoring epileptic seizure detection devices

BACKGROUND

Early detection and alert notification of an impending seizure for people with epilepsy have the potential to reduce Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). Current remote monitoring seizure detection devices for people with epilepsy are designed to support real-time monitoring of their vital health parameters linked to seizure alert notification. An understanding of the rapidly growing literature on remote seizure detection devices is essential to address the needs of people with epilepsy and their carers.

AIM

This review aims to examine the technical characteristics, device performance, user preference, and effectiveness of remote monitoring seizure detection devices.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review referenced to PRISMA guidelines was used.

RESULTS

A total of 1095 papers were identified from the initial search with 30 papers included in the review. Sixteen non-invasive remote monitoring seizure detection devices are currently available. Such seizure detection devices were found to have inbuilt intelligent sensor functionality to monitor electroencephalography, muscle movement, and accelerometer-based motion movement for detecting seizures remotely. Current challenges of these devices for people with epilepsy include skin irritation due to the type of patch electrode used and false alarm notifications, particularly during physical activity. The tight-fitted accelerometer-type devices are reported as uncomfortable from a wearability perspective for long-term monitoring. Also, continuous recording of physiological signals and triggering alert notifications significantly reduce the battery life of the devices. The literature highlights that 3.2 out of 5 people with epilepsy are not using seizure detection devices because of the cost and appearance of the device.

CONCLUSION

Seizure detection devices can potentially reduce morbidity and mortality for people with epilepsy. Therefore, further collaboration of clinicians, technical experts, and researchers is needed for the future development of these devices. Finally, it is important to always take into consideration the expectations and requirements of people with epilepsy and their carers to facilitate the next generation of remote monitoring seizure detection devices.

Novel ML-Based Algorithm for Detecting Seizures from Single-Channel EEG

There is a need for seizure classification based on EEG signals that can be implemented with a portable device for in-home continuous minoring of epilepsy. In this study, we developed a novel machine learning algorithm for seizure detection suitable for wearable systems. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was implemented to classify seizures from single-channel EEG obtained from an open-source CHB-MIT database. The results of classifying 1-s EEG segments are shown to be sufficient to obtain the information needed for seizure detection and achieve a high seizure sensitivity of up to 89% with low computational cost. This algorithm can be impeded in single-channel EEG systems that use in- or around-the-ear electrodes for continuous seizure monitoring at home.

Feasibility of cardiac-based seizure detection and prediction: A systematic review of non-invasive wearable sensor-based studies

A reliable seizure detection or prediction device can potentially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with epileptic seizures. Previous findings indicating alterations in cardiac activity during seizures suggest the usefulness of cardiac parameters for seizure detection or prediction. This study aims to examine available studies on seizure detection and prediction based on cardiac parameters using non-invasive wearable devices. The Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases were used to systematically search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Human studies that evaluated seizure detection or prediction based on cardiac parameters collected using wearable devices were included. The QUADAS-2 tool and proposed standards for validation for seizure detection devices were used for quality assessment. Twenty-four articles were identified and included in the analysis. Twenty studies evaluated seizure detection algorithms, and four studies focused on seizure prediction. Most studies used either a wrist-worn or chest-worn device for data acquisition. Among the seizure detection studies, cardiac parameters utilized for the algorithms mainly included heart rate (HR) (n = 11) or a combination of HR and heart rate variability (HRV) (n = 6). HR-based seizure detection studies collectively reported a sensitivity range of 56%-100% and a false alarm rate (FAR) of 0.02-8/h, with most studies performing retrospective validation of the algorithms. Three of the seizure prediction studies retrospectively validated multimodal algorithms, combining cardiac features with other physiological signals. Only one study prospectively validated their seizure prediction algorithm using HRV extracted from ECG data collected from a custom wearable device. These studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using cardiac parameters for seizure detection and prediction with wearable devices, with varying algorithmic performance. Many studies are in the proof-of-principle stage, and evidence for real-time detection or prediction is currently limited. Future studies should prioritize further refinement of the algorithm performance with prospective validation using large-scale longitudinal data. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This systematic review highlights the potential use of wearable devices, like wristbands, for detecting and predicting seizures via the measurement of heart activity. By reviewing 24 articles, it was found that most studies focused on using heart rate and changes in heart rate for seizure detection. There was a lack of studies looking at seizure prediction. The results were promising but most studies were not conducted in real-time. Therefore, more real-time studies are needed to verify the usage of heart activity-related wearable devices to detect seizures and even predict them, which will be beneficial to people with epilepsy.

Feasibility and acceptability of an ultra-long-term at-home EEG monitoring system (EEG@HOME) for people with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Recent technological advancements offer new ways to monitor and manage epilepsy. The adoption of these devices in routine clinical practice will strongly depend on patient acceptability and usability, with their perspectives being crucial. Previous studies provided feedback from patients, but few explored the experience of them using independently multiple devices independently at home.

PURPOSE

The study, assessed through a mixed methods design, the direct experiences of people with epilepsy independently using a non-invasive monitoring system (EEG@HOME) for an extended duration of 6 months, at home. We aimed to investigate factors affecting engagement, gather qualitative insights, and provide recommendations for future home epilepsy monitoring systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults with epilepsy independently were trained to use a wearable dry EEG system, a wrist-worn device, and a smartphone app for seizure tracking and behaviour monitoring for 6 months at home. Monthly acceptability questionnaires (PSSUQ, SUS) and semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore participant experience. Adherence with the procedure, acceptability scores and systematic thematic analysis of the interviews, focusing on the experience with the procedure, motivation and benefits and opinion about the procedure were assessed.

RESULTS

Twelve people with epilepsy took part into the study for an average of 193.8 days (range 61 to 312) with a likelihood of using the system at six months of 83 %. The e-diary and the smartwatch were highly acceptable and preferred to a wearable EEG system (PSSUQ score of 1.9, 1.9, 2.4). Participants showed an acceptable level of adherence with all solutions (Average usage of 63 %, 66 %, 92 %) reporting more difficulties using the EEG twice a day and remembering to complete the daily behavioural questionnaires. Clear information and training, continuous remote support, perceived direct and indirect benefits and the possibility to have a flexible, tailored to daily routine monitoring were defined as key factors to ensure compliance with long-term monitoring systems.

CONCLUSIONS

EEG@HOME study demonstrated people with epilepsy' interest and ability in active health monitoring using new technologies. Remote training and support enable independent home use of new non-invasive technologies, but to ensure long term acceptability and usability systems will require to be integrated into patients' routines, include healthcare providers, and offer continuous support and personalized feedback.

Seizure Detection Devices in Children: One Step Closer

Multimodal Nocturnal Seizure Detection in Children With Epilepsy: A Prospective, Multicenter, Long-Term, In-Home Trial van Westrhenen A, Lazeron RHC, van Dijk JP, Leijten FSS, Thijs RD; Dutch TeleEpilepsy Consortium. Epilepsia. 2023;64(8):2137-2152. doi:10.1111/epi.17654 Objective: There is a pressing need for reliable automated seizure detection in epilepsy care. Performance evidence on ambulatory non-electroencephalography-based seizure detection devices is low, and evidence on their effect on caregiver’s stress, sleep, and quality of life (QoL) is still lacking. We aimed to determine the performance of NightWatch, a wearable nocturnal seizure detection device, in children with epilepsy in the family home setting and to assess its impact on caregiver burden. Methods: We conducted a phase 4, multicenter, prospective, video-controlled, in-home NightWatch implementation study (NCT03909984). We included children aged 4-16 years, with ≥1 weekly nocturnal major motor seizure, living at home. We compared a 2-month baseline period with a 2-month NightWatch intervention. The primary outcome was the detection performance of NightWatch for major motor seizures (focal to bilateral or generalized tonic-clonic [TC] seizures, focal to bilateral or generalized tonic seizures lasting >30 s, hyperkinetic seizures, and a remainder category of focal to bilateral or generalized clonic seizures and “TC-like” seizures). Secondary outcomes included caregivers’ stress (Caregiver Strain Index [CSI]), sleep (Pittsburgh Quality of Sleep Index), and QoL (EuroQol five-dimension five-level scale). Results: We included 53 children (55% male, mean age = 9.7 ± 3.6 years, 68% learning disability) and analyzed 2310 nights (28 173 h), including 552 major motor seizures. Nineteen participants did not experience any episode of interest during the trial. The median detection sensitivity per participant was 100% (range = 46%-100%), and the median individual false alarm rate was .04 per hour (range = 0-.53). Caregiver’s stress decreased significantly (mean total CSI score = 8.0 vs. 7.1, p = .032), whereas caregiver’s sleep and QoL did not change significantly during the trial. Significance: The NightWatch system demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting nocturnal major motor seizures in children in a family home setting and reduced caregiver stress.

Real-world user experience with seizure detection wearable devices in the home environment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate direct user experience with wearable seizure detection devices in the home environment.

METHODS

A structured online questionnaire was completed by 242 users (175 caregivers and 67 persons with epilepsy), most of the patients (87.19%) having tonic-clonic seizures.

RESULTS

The vast majority of the users were overall satisfied with the wearable device, considered that using the device was easy, and agreed that the use of the device improved their quality of life (median = 6 on 7-point Likert scale). A high retention rate (84.58%) and a long median usage time (14 months) were reported. In the home environment, most users (75.85%) experienced seizure detection sensitivity similar (≥95%) to what was previously reported in validation studies in epilepsy monitoring units. The experienced false alarm rate was relatively low (0-0.43 per day). Due to the alarms, almost one third of persons with epilepsy (PWEs; 30.00%) experienced decrease in the number of seizure-related injuries, and almost two thirds of PWEs (65.41%) experienced improvement in the accuracy of seizure diaries. Nonvalidated devices had significantly lower retention rate, overall satisfaction, perceived sensitivity, and improvement in quality of life, as compared with validated devices.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of automated seizure detection in the home environment.

Distinction between epileptic and non-epileptic arousal by heart rate change

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the difference in heart rate (HR) change between epileptic and non-epileptic arousals in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE).

METHODS

This is a case-control study conducted at the University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center. Inclusion criteria are (1) adult (≥18 years old) PWE who had arousal related to a focal aware or impaired awareness automatism seizure with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure during an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) admission between January 2009 and January 2021 or (2) adult PWE who had a non-epileptic arousal during an EMU admission between July 2020 and January 2021. Outcomes are (1) a percent change in baseline HR within 60 s after arousal and (2) the highest percent change in baseline HR within a 10-s sliding time window within 60 s after arousal.

RESULTS

We included 20 non-epileptic arousals from 20 adult PWE and 29 epileptic arousals with seizures from 29 adult PWE. Within 60 s after arousal, HR increased by a median of 86.7% (interquartile range (IQR), 52.7%-121.3%) in the epileptic arousal group compared to a median of 26.1% (12.9%-43.3%) in the non-epileptic arousal group (p < 0.001). The cut-off value was 48.7%. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were 0.85, 0.79, and 0.80, respectively. More than 70.1% was only in the epileptic arousals, with 100% specificity. Within 10 s of the greatest change, HR increased by 36.5 (18.7%-48.4%) in the epileptic arousal group compared to 17.7 (10.9%-23.7%) in the non-epileptic arousal group (p < 0.001). The cut-off value was 36.5%. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.79, 0.52, and 0.95, respectively. More than 48.1% was only in the epileptic arousals, with 100% specificity.

SIGNIFICANCE

Tachycardia during epileptic arousals was significantly higher and more robust compared to tachycardia during non-epileptic arousals.

Non-electroencephalogram-based seizure detection devices: State of the art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

The continuously expanding research and development of wearable devices for automated seizure detection in epilepsy uses mostly non-invasive technology. Real-time alarms, triggered by seizure detection devices, are needed for safety and prevention to decrease seizure-related morbidity and mortality, as well as objective quantification of seizure frequency and severity. Our review strives to provide a state-of-the-art on automated seizure detection using non-invasive wearable devices in an ambulatory (home) environment and to highlight the prospects for future research.

METHODS

A joint working group of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) recently published a clinical practice guideline on automated seizure detection using wearable devices. We updated the systematic literature search for the period since the last search by the joint working group. We selected studies qualifying minimally as phase-2 clinical validation trials, in accordance with standards for testing and validation of seizure detection devices.

RESULTS

High-level evidence (phases 3 and 4) is available only for the detection of tonic-clonic seizures and major motor seizures when using wearable devices based on accelerometry, surface electromyography (EMG), or a multimodal device combining accelerometry and heart rate. The reported sensitivity of these devices is 79.4-96%, with a false alarm rate of 0.20-1.92 per 24 hours (0-0.03 per night). A single phase-3 study validated the detection of absence seizures using a single-channel wearable EEG device. Two phase-4 studies showed overall user satisfaction with wearable seizure detection devices, which helped decrease injuries related to tonic-clonic seizures. Overall satisfaction, perceived sensitivity, and improvement in quality-of-life were significantly higher for validated devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the vast number of studies published on seizure detection devices, most are strongly affected by potential bias, providing a too-optimistic perspective. By applying the standards for clinical validation studies, potential bias can be reduced, and the quality of a continuously growing number of studies in this field can be assessed and compared. The ILAE-IFCN clinical practice guideline on automated seizure detection using wearable devices recommends using clinically validated wearable devices for automated detection of tonic-clonic seizures when significant safety concerns exist. The studies published after the guideline was issued only provide incremental knowledge and would not change the current recommendations.

Wrist-worn smartwatch and predictive models for seizures

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to describe extracerebral biosignal characteristics of overall and various seizure types as compared with baseline physical activities using multimodal devices (Empatica E4); develop predictive models for overall and each seizure type; and assess diagnostic performance of each model.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited patients with focal epilepsy who were admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit for presurgical evaluation during January to December 2020. All study participants were simultaneously applied gold standard long-term video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring and an index test, E4. Two certified epileptologists independently determined whether captured events were seizures and then indicated ictal semiology and EEG information. Both were blind to multimodal biosignal findings detected by E4. Biosignals during 5-min epochs of both seizure events and baseline were collected and compared. Predictive models for occurrence overall and of each seizure type were developed using a generalized estimating equation. Diagnostic performance of each model was then assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients had events recorded and were recruited for analysis. One hundred eight seizure events and 120 baseline epochs were collected. Heart rate (HR), acceleration (ACC), and electrodermal activity (EDA) but not temperature were significantly elevated during seizures. Cluster analysis showed trends of greatest elevation of HR and ACC in bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (BTCs), as compared with non-BTCs and isolated auras. HR and ACC were independent predictors for overall seizure types, BTCs, and non-BTCs, whereas only HR was a predictor for isolated aura. Diagnostic performance including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the predictive model for overall seizures were 77.78%, 60%, and .696 (95% confidence interval = .628-.764), respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

Multimodal extracerebral biosignals (HR, ACC, EDA) detected by a wrist-worn smartwatch can help differentiate between epileptic seizures and normal physical activities. It would be worthwhile to implement our predictive algorithms in commercial seizure detection devices. However, larger studies to externally validate our predictive models are required.

Nocturnal seizure detection: What are the needs and expectations of adults with epilepsy receiving secondary care?

INTRODUCTION

Seizure detection devices (SDDs) may lower the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and provide reassurance to people with epilepsy and their relatives. We aimed to explore the perspectives of those receiving secondary care on nocturnal SDDs and epilepsy in general.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We recruited adults with tonic or tonic-clonic seizures who had at least one nocturnal seizure in the preceding year. We used semi-structured interviews and questionnaires to explore their views on SDDs and their experiences of living with epilepsy. None of the participants had any previous experience with SDDs. We analyzed the data using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven participants were included with a nocturnal seizure frequency ranging from once every few weeks to less than once a year. Some participants experienced little burden of disease, whereas others were extremely impaired. Opinions on the perceived benefit of seizure detection varied widely and did not always match the clinical profile. Some participants with high SUDEP risk displayed no interest at all, whereas others with a low risk for unattended seizures displayed a strong interest. Reasons for wanting to use SDDs included providing reassurance, SUDEP prevention, and improving night rest. Reasons for not wanting to use SDDs included not being able to afford it, having to deal with false alarms, not having anyone to act upon the alarms, having a relative that will notice any seizures, not feeling like the epilepsy is severe enough to warrant SDD usage or not trusting the device.

CONCLUSIONS

The interest in nocturnal seizure detection varies among participants with low seizure frequencies and does not always match the added value one would expect based on the clinical profile. Further developments should account for the heterogeneity in user groups.

Ictal vocalizations in the Scn1a+/- mouse model of Dravet syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Ictal vocalizations have shown diagnostic utility in epilepsy patients. Audio recordings of seizures have also been used for seizure detection. The present study aimed to determine whether generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the Scn1a+/- mouse model of Dravet syndrome are associated with either audible mouse squeaks or ultrasonic vocalizations.

METHODS

Acoustic recordings were captured from group-housed Scn1a+/- mice undergoing video-monitoring to quantify spontaneous seizure frequency. We generated audio clips (n = 129) during a generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) that included 30 seconds immediately prior to the GTCS (preictal) and 30 seconds following the conclusion of the seizure (postictal). Nonseizure clips (n = 129) were also exported from the acoustic recordings. A blinded reviewer manually reviewed the audio clips, and vocalizations were identified as either an audible (<20 kHz) mouse squeak or ultrasonic (>20 kHz).

RESULTS

Spontaneous GTCS in Scn1a+/- mice were associated with a significantly higher number of total vocalizations. The number of audible mouse squeaks was significantly greater with GTCS activity. Nearly all (98%) the seizure clips contained ultrasonic vocalizations, whereas ultrasonic vocalizations were present in only 57% of nonseizure clips. The ultrasonic vocalizations emitted in the seizure clips were at a significantly higher frequency and were nearly twice as long in duration as those emitted in the nonseizure clips. Audible mouse squeaks were primarily emitted during the preictal phase. The greatest number of ultrasonic vocalizations was detected during the ictal phase.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study shows that ictal vocalizations are exhibited by Scn1a+/- mice. Quantitative audio analysis could be developed as a seizure detection tool for the Scn1a+/- mouse model of Dravet syndrome.

Multimodal nocturnal seizure detection in children with epilepsy: A prospective, multicenter, long-term, in-home trial

OBJECTIVE

There is a pressing need for reliable automated seizure detection in epilepsy care. Performance evidence on ambulatory non-electroencephalography-based seizure detection devices is low, and evidence on their effect on caregiver's stress, sleep, and quality of life (QoL) is still lacking. We aimed to determine the performance of NightWatch, a wearable nocturnal seizure detection device, in children with epilepsy in the family home setting and to assess its impact on caregiver burden.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 4, multicenter, prospective, video-controlled, in-home NightWatch implementation study (NCT03909984). We included children aged 4-16 years, with ≥1 weekly nocturnal major motor seizure, living at home. We compared a 2-month baseline period with a 2-month NightWatch intervention. The primary outcome was the detection performance of NightWatch for major motor seizures (focal to bilateral or generalized tonic-clonic [TC] seizures, focal to bilateral or generalized tonic seizures lasting >30 s, hyperkinetic seizures, and a remainder category of focal to bilateral or generalized clonic seizures and "TC-like" seizures). Secondary outcomes included caregivers' stress (Caregiver Strain Index [CSI]), sleep (Pittsburgh Quality of Sleep Index), and QoL (EuroQol five-dimension five-level scale).

RESULTS

We included 53 children (55% male, mean age = 9.7 ± 3.6 years, 68% learning disability) and analyzed 2310 nights (28 173 h), including 552 major motor seizures. Nineteen participants did not experience any episode of interest during the trial. The median detection sensitivity per participant was 100% (range = 46%-100%), and the median individual false alarm rate was .04 per hour (range = 0-.53). Caregiver's stress decreased significantly (mean total CSI score = 8.0 vs. 7.1, p = .032), whereas caregiver's sleep and QoL did not change significantly during the trial.

SIGNIFICANCE

The NightWatch system demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting nocturnal major motor seizures in children in a family home setting and reduced caregiver stress.

Personalized seizure detection using logistic regression machine learning based on wearable ECG-monitoring device

PURPOSE

Wearable automated detection devices of focal epileptic seizures are needed to alert patients and caregivers and to optimize the medical treatment. Heart rate variability (HRV)-based seizure detection devices have presented good detection sensitivity. However, false alarm rates (FAR) are too high.

METHODS

In this phase-2 study we pursued to decrease the FAR, by using patient-adaptive logistic regression machine learning (LRML) to improve the performance of a previously published HRV-based seizure detection algorithm. ECG-data were prospectively collected using a dedicated wearable electrocardiogram-device during long-term video-EEG monitoring. Sixty-two patients had 174 seizures during 4,614 h recording. The dataset was divided into training-, cross-validation-, and test-sets (chronological) in order to avoid overfitting. Patients with >50 beats/min change in heart rate during first recorded seizure were selected as responders. We compared 18 LRML-settings to find the optimal algorithm.

RESULTS

The patient-adaptive LRML-classifier in combination with using only responders to train the initial decision boundary was superior to both the generic approach and including non-responders to train the LRML-classifier. Using the optimal setting of the LRML in responders in the test dataset yielded a sensitivity of 78.2% and FAR of 0.62/24 h. The FAR was reduced by 31% compared to the previous method, upholding similar sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The novel, patient-adaptive LRML seizure detection algorithm outperformed both the generic approach and the previously published patient-tailored method. The proposed method can be implemented in a wearable online HRV-based seizure detection system alerting patients and caregivers of seizures and improve seizure-count which may help optimizing the patient treatment.

Who cares? A scoping review on intellectual disability, epilepsy and social care

PURPOSE

Nearly a quarter of people with Intellectual disability (PwID) have epilepsy. Many have seizures across their lifetime. In the UK supporting their epilepsy linked risks and needs, particularly in professional care settings and in the community, requires significant social care input. Therefore, the interface between social and health care services is important. This study aim is to identify key intersectional areas of social provision for PWID and epilepsy.

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidance with suitable search terms. The search was completed in CINAHL, Embase, Psych INFO, SCIE, and Cochrane electronic databases by an information specialist. A quality assessment was completed for the included studies where appropriate. The included studies were analysed qualitatively to identify key themes and provide a narrative description of the evidence by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Of 748 papers screened, 94 were retrieved. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria with a range of methodologies. A thematic analysis generated four key categories for significant social care involvement i.e., staff training and education; emergency seizure management; holistic approach to care; and nocturnal monitoring and supervision.

CONCLUSIONS

PwID with epilepsy have support needs that require fulfilling by various aspects of special care provision, many within the social ambit. Inspite of evidence of these needs and recurrent calls to work jointly with social care providers this has not happened. There is limited research into social care role in epilepsy management in PwID which needs addressing.

Seizure-related complication rate in a residential population with epilepsy and intellectual disability (ECOMRAID-trial)

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the ECOMRAID trial (Epileptic seizure related Complication RAte in residential population of persons with epilepsy and Intellectual Disability) was to study seizure-related complications (status epilepticus, respiratory complications, or other severe complications) in people with epilepsy and intellectual disability living in a residential setting. The results of the present study are a prerequisite for performing a prospective study into the effectiveness of nocturnal surveillance patients with high risk for Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in three general residential care institutions and one residential specialized epilepsy clinic. In this 5-year cohort, we collected the following data: age (at inclusion and in case of death), sex, type of residential care, different types of complications, rescue/emergency medication administration, transfers to another department (internal midcare / monitoring unit or general hospital) and a self-designed SUDEP risk score. Our primary research questions were to assess the number of patients who experienced seizure-related complications and their individual complication rates. The secondary research questions were to document the relationship of these complications with the SUDEP risk score, with the type of residential living, and with the frequency of interventions by caregivers.

RESULTS

We included 370 patients (1790 patient-years) and in 135 of them, we found 717 seizure-related complications. The following complication rates were found: all complications: at 36%, status epilepticus: at 13%, respiratory complications: at 5%, and other complications at 26%. In residential care institutions, we found fewer patients with complications compared to the specialized epilepsy clinic (all complications 24% vs 42%, OR 0.44, p < 0.01; status epilepticus 5% vs 17%, OR 0.27, p < 0.01; other: complications 19% vs 30%, OR 0.56, p < 0.05). In residential care institutions, we found more "other complications" than in the specialized epilepsy clinic (89% vs 71%, OR 3.13, p < 0.0001). The annual frequency of all complications together was higher in residential care institutions (range 0 to 21 vs 0 to 10, p < 0.05). Rescue medication was given to 75% of the patients, but more often in the specialized epilepsy clinic (median 2.6 vs 0.5 times/patient/year, p < 0.001). In the specialized epilepsy clinic, more patients were transferred to a midcare / monitoring unit or general hospital (56% vs 9%, OR 13.44, p < 0.0001) with higher yearly frequencies (median 0.2 vs 0.0, p < 0.001). There were no reported cases of SUDEP. The median SUDEP risk score was higher in the specialized epilepsy clinic (5 vs 4, p < 0.05) and was weakly correlated with the status epilepticus (ρ = 0.20, p < 0.001) and (total) complication rate (ρ = 0.18, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found seizure-related complications in more than one-third of the patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability living in a residential setting over a period of 5 years. The data also quantify seizure-related complications in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability.

Data quality evaluation in wearable monitoring

Wearable recordings of neurophysiological signals captured from the wrist offer enormous potential for seizure monitoring. Yet, data quality remains one of the most challenging factors that impact data reliability. We suggest a combined data quality assessment tool for the evaluation of multimodal wearable data. We analyzed data from patients with epilepsy from four epilepsy centers. Patients wore wristbands recording accelerometry, electrodermal activity, blood volume pulse, and skin temperature. We calculated data completeness and assessed the time the device was worn (on-body), and modality-specific signal quality scores. We included 37,166 h from 632 patients in the inpatient and 90,776 h from 39 patients in the outpatient setting. All modalities were affected by artifacts. Data loss was higher when using data streaming (up to 49% among inpatient cohorts, averaged across respective recordings) as compared to onboard device recording and storage (up to 9%). On-body scores, estimating the percentage of time a device was worn on the body, were consistently high across cohorts (more than 80%). Signal quality of some modalities, based on established indices, was higher at night than during the day. A uniformly reported data quality and multimodal signal quality index is feasible, makes study results more comparable, and contributes to the development of devices and evaluation routines necessary for seizure monitoring.

Seizure detection based on wearable devices: A review of device, mechanism, and algorithm

With sudden and unpredictable nature, seizures lead to great risk of the secondary damage, status epilepticus, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Thus, it is essential to use a wearable device to detect seizure and inform patients' caregivers for assistant to prevent or relieve adverse consequence. In this review, we gave an account of the current state of the field of seizure detection based on wearable devices from three parts: devices, physiological activities, and algorithms. Firstly, seizure monitoring devices available in the market primarily involve wristband-type devices, patch-type devices, and armband-type devices, which are able to detect motor seizures, focal autonomic seizures, or absence seizures. Secondly, seizure-related physiological activities involve the discharge of brain neurons presented, autonomous nervous activities, and motor. Plenty of studies focus on features from one signal, while it is a lack of evidences about the change of signal coupling along with seizures. Thirdly, the seizure detection algorithms developed from simple threshold method to complicated machine learning and deep learning, aiming at distinguish seizures from normal events. After understanding of some preliminary studies, we will propose our own thought for future development in this field.

An economic evaluation of the NightWatch for children with refractory epilepsy: Insight into the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility

PURPOSE

We performed an economic evaluation, from a societal perspective, to examine the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of a wearable multimodal seizure detection device: NightWatch.

METHODS

We collected data between November 2018 and June 2020 from the PROMISE trial (NCT03909984), including children aged 4-16 years with refractory epilepsy living at home. Caregivers completed questionnaires on stress, quality of life, health care consumption and productivity costs after two-month baseline and two-month intervention with NightWatch. We used costs, stress levels and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Missing items were handled by mean imputation. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of the results including bootstrap sampling.

RESULTS

We included 41 children (44% female; mean age 9.8 years, standard deviation (SD) 3.7 years). Total societal costs of the baseline period (T1) were on average €3,238 per patient, whereas after intervention (T2) this reduced to 2,463 (saving €775). The QALYs were similar between both periods (mean QALY 0.90 per participant, SD at T1 0.10, SD at T2 0.13). At a ceiling ratio of €50.000, NightWatch showed a 72% cost-effective probability. Univariate sensitivity analyses, on the perspective and imputation method, demonstrated result robustness.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that NightWatch might be a cost-effective addition to current standard care for children with refractory epilepsy living at home. Further research with an additional target group for a large timeframe may support the findings of this research.

Seizures detection using multimodal signals: a scoping review

Introduction. Epileptic seizures are common neurological disorders in the world, impacting 65 million people globally. Around 30% of patients with seizures suffer from refractory epilepsy, where seizures are not controlled by medications. The unpredictability of seizures makes it essential to have a continuous seizure monitoring system outside clinical settings for the purpose of minimizing patients' injuries and providing additional pathways for evaluation and treatment follow-up. Autonomic changes related to seizure events have been extensively studied and attempts made to apply them for seizure detection and prediction tasks. This scoping review aims to depict current research activities associated with the implementation of portable, wearable devices for seizure detection or prediction and inform future direction in continuous seizure tracking in ambulatory settings.Methods. Overall methodology framework includes 5 essential stages: research questions identification, relevant studies identification, selection of studies, data charting and summarizing the findings. A systematic searching strategy guided by systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) was implemented to identify relevant records on two databases (PubMed, IEEE).Results. A total of 30 articles were included in our final analysis. Most of the studies were conducted off-line and employed consumer-graded wearable device. ACM is the dominant modality to be used in seizure detection, and widely deployed algorithms entail Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and threshold-based approach. The sensitivity ranged from 33.2% to 100% for single modality with a false alarm rate (FAR) ranging from 0.096 to 14.8 d-1. Multimodality has a sensitivity ranging from 51% to 100% with FAR ranging from 0.12 to 17.7 d-1.Conclusion. The overall performance in seizure detection system based on non-cerebral physiological signals is promising, especially for the detection of motor seizures and seizures accompanied with intense ictal autonomic changes.

Preferences and User Experiences of Wearable Devices in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Mixed-Methods Synthesis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To examine the preferences and user experiences of people with epilepsy and caregivers regarding automated wearable seizure detection devices.

METHODS

We performed a mixed-methods systematic review. We searched electronic databases for original peer-reviewed publications between January 1, 2000, and May 26, 2021. Key search terms included "epilepsy", "seizure", "wearable", and "non-invasive". We performed a descriptive and a qualitative thematic analysis of the studies included according to the technology acceptance model. Full texts of the discussion sections were further analyzed to identify word frequency and word mapping.

RESULTS

Twenty-two observational studies were identified. Collectively, they comprised responses from 3299 participants including patients with epilepsy, caregivers and healthcare workers. Sixteen studies examined user preferences, five examined user experiences, and one examined both experiences and preferences. Important preferences for wearables included improving care, cost, accuracy, and design. Patients desired real-time detection with a latency of ≤15 minutes from seizure occurrence, along with high sensitivity (≥90%) and low false-alarm rates. Device related costs were a major factor for device acceptance, where device costs of <$300 USD and a monthly subscription fee of <$20 USD were preferred. Despite being a major driver of wearable-based technologies, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) was rarely discussed. Among studies evaluating user experiences, there was a greater acceptance towards wristwatches. Thematic coding analysis showed that attitudes towards device use, and perceived usefulness were reported consistently. Word mapping identified 'specificity', 'cost', and 'battery' as key single terms, and 'battery life', 'insurance coverage', 'prediction/detection quality', and the effect of devices on 'daily life' as key bigrams.

DISCUSSION

User acceptance of wearable technology for seizure detection was strongly influenced by accuracy, design, comfort, and cost. Our findings emphasise the need for standardised and validated tools to comprehensively examine preferences and user experiences of wearable devices in this population, using the themes identified in this study. Greater efforts to incorporate perspectives and user experiences in developing wearables for seizure detection, particularly in community-based settings are needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42020193565.

Multimodal nocturnal seizure detection: do we need to adapt algorithms for children?

Objective

To assess the performance of a multimodal seizure detection device, first tested in adults (sensitivity 86%, PPV 49%), in a pediatric cohort living at home or residential care.

Methods

In this multicenter, prospective, video‐controlled cohort‐study, nocturnal seizures were detected by heartrate and movement changes in children with epilepsy and intellectual disability. Participants with a history of >1 monthly major motor seizure wore Nightwatch bracelet at night for 3 months. Major seizures were defined as tonic–clonic, generalized tonic >30 s, hyperkinetic, or clusters (>30 min) of short myoclonic or tonic seizures. The video of all events (alarms and nurse diaries) and about 10% of whole nights were reviewed to classify major seizures, and minor or no seizures.

Results

Twenty‐three participants with focal or generalized epilepsy and nightly motor seizures were evaluated during 1511 nights, with 1710 major seizures. First 1014 nights, 4189 alarms occurred with average of 1.44/h, showing average sensitivity of 79.9% (median 75.4%) with mean PPV of 26.7% (median 11.1%) and false alarm rate of 0.2/hour. Over 90% of false alarms in children was due to heart rate (HR) part of the detection algorithm. To improve this rate, an adaptation was made such that the alarm was only triggered when the wearer was in horizontal position. For the remaining 497 nights, this was tested prospectively, 384 major seizures occurred. This resulted in mean PPV of 55.5% (median 58.1%) and a false alarm rate 0.08/h while maintaining a comparable mean sensitivity of 79.4% (median 93.2%).

Significance

Seizure detection devices that are used in bed which depend on heartrate and movement show similar sensitivity in children and adults. However, children do show general higher false alarm rate, mostly triggered while awake. By correcting for body position, the false alarms can be limited to a level that comes close to that in adults.

Intra- and Inter-Subject Perspectives on the Detection of Focal Onset Motor Seizures in Epilepsy Patients

Focal onset epileptic seizures are highly heterogeneous in their clinical manifestations, and a robust seizure detection across patient cohorts has to date not been achieved. Here, we assess and discuss the potential of supervised machine learning models for the detection of focal onset motor seizures by means of a wrist-worn wearable device, both in a personalized context as well as across patients. Wearable data were recorded in-hospital from patients with epilepsy at two epilepsy centers. Accelerometry, electrodermal activity, and blood volume pulse data were processed and features for each of the biosignal modalities were calculated. Following a leave-one-out approach, a gradient tree boosting machine learning model was optimized and tested in an intra-subject and inter-subject evaluation. In total, 20 seizures from 9 patients were included and we report sensitivities of 67% to 100% and false alarm rates of down to 0.85 per 24 h in the individualized assessment. Conversely, for an inter-subject seizure detection methodology tested on an out-of-sample data set, an optimized model could only achieve a sensitivity of 75% at a false alarm rate of 13.4 per 24 h. We demonstrate that robustly detecting focal onset motor seizures with tonic or clonic movements from wearable data may be possible for individuals, depending on specific seizure manifestations.

Parental preferences for seizure detection devices: a discrete choice experiment

Objective

Previous studies identified essential user preferences for seizure detection devices (SDDs), without addressing their relative strength. We performed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantify attributes' strength, and to identify the determinants of user SDD preferences.

Methods

We designed an online questionnaire targeting parents of children with epilepsy to define the optimal balance between SDD sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) while accounting for individual seizure frequency. We selected five DCE attributes from a recent study. Using a Bayesian design, we constructed 11 unique choice tasks and analyzed these using a mixed multinomial logit model.

Results

One hundred parents responded to the online questionnaire link; 49 completed all tasks, whereas 28 completed the questions, but not the DCE. Most parents preferred a relatively high sensitivity (80%–90%) over a high PPV (>50%). The preferred sensitivity‐to‐PPV ratio correlated with seizure frequency (r = −.32), with a preference for relative high sensitivity and low PPV among those with relative low seizure frequency (p = .04). All DCE attributes significantly impacted parental choices. Parents expressed preferences for consulting a neurologist before device use, personally training the device's algorithm, interaction with their child via audio and video, alarms for all seizure types, and an interface detailing measurements during an alarm. Preferences varied between subgroups (learning disability or not, SDD experience, relative low vs. high seizure frequency based on the population median).

Significance

Various attributes impact parental SDD preferences and may explain why preferences vary among users. Tailored approaches may help to meet the contrasting needs among SDD users.

Wearable electroencephalography for ultra-long-term seizure monitoring: a systematic review and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

: Wearable electroencephalography (EEG) for objective seizure counting might transform the clinical management of epilepsy. Non-EEG modalities have been validated for the detection of convulsive seizures, but there is still an unmet need for the detection of non-convulsive seizures.

AREAS COVERED

: The main objective of this systematic review was to explore the current status on wearable surface- and subcutaneous EEG for long-term seizure monitoring in epilepsy. We included 17 studies and evaluated the progress on the field, including device specifications, intended populations, and main results on the published studies including diagnostic accuracy measures. Furthermore, we examine the hurdles for widespread clinical implementation. This systematic review and expert opinion both consults the PRISMA guidelines and reflects on the future perspectives of this emerging field.

EXPERT OPINION

: Wearable EEG for long-term seizure monitoring is an emerging field, with plenty of proposed devices and proof-of-concept clinical validation studies. The possible implications of these devices are immense including objective seizure counting and possibly forecasting. However, the true clinical value of the devices, including effects on patient important outcomes and clinical decision making is yet to be unveiled and large-scale clinical validation trials are called for.

Detecting Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Multimodal Biosignal Data From Wearables: Methodology Design and Validation

BACKGROUND

Video electroencephalography recordings, routinely used in epilepsy monitoring units, are the gold standard for monitoring epileptic seizures. However, monitoring is also needed in the day-to-day lives of people with epilepsy, where video electroencephalography is not feasible. Wearables could fill this gap by providing patients with an accurate log of their seizures.

OBJECTIVE

Although there are already systems available that provide promising results for the detection of tonic-clonic seizures (TCSs), research in this area is often limited to detection from 1 biosignal modality or only during the night when the patient is in bed. The aim of this study is to provide evidence that supervised machine learning can detect TCSs from multimodal data in a new data set during daytime and nighttime.

METHODS

An extensive data set of biosignals from a multimodal watch worn by people with epilepsy was recorded during their stay in the epilepsy monitoring unit at 2 European clinical sites. From a larger data set of 243 enrolled participants, those who had data recorded during TCSs were selected, amounting to 10 participants with 21 TCSs. Accelerometry and electrodermal activity recorded by the wearable device were used for analysis, and seizure manifestation was annotated in detail by clinical experts. Ten accelerometry and 3 electrodermal activity features were calculated for sliding windows of variable size across the data. A gradient tree boosting algorithm was used for seizure detection, and the optimal parameter combination was determined in a leave-one-participant-out cross-validation on a training set of 10 seizures from 8 participants. The model was then evaluated on an out-of-sample test set of 11 seizures from the remaining 2 participants. To assess specificity, we additionally analyzed data from up to 29 participants without TCSs during the model evaluation.

RESULTS

In the leave-one-participant-out cross-validation, the model optimized for sensitivity could detect all 10 seizures with a false alarm rate of 0.46 per day in 17.3 days of data. In a test set of 11 out-of-sample TCSs, amounting to 8.3 days of data, the model could detect 10 seizures and produced no false positives. Increasing the test set to include data from 28 more participants without additional TCSs resulted in a false alarm rate of 0.19 per day in 78 days of wearable data.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that a gradient tree boosting machine can robustly detect TCSs from multimodal wearable data in an original data set and that even with very limited training data, supervised machine learning can achieve a high sensitivity and low false-positive rate. This methodology may offer a promising way to approach wearable-based nonconvulsive seizure detection.

The Challenging Path to Developing a Mobile Health Device for Epilepsy: The Current Landscape and Where We Go From Here

Seizure detection, and more recently seizure forecasting, represent important avenues of clinical development in epilepsy, promoted by progress in wearable devices and mobile health (mHealth), which might help optimizing seizure control and prevention of seizure-related mortality and morbidity in persons with epilepsy. Yet, very long-term continuous monitoring of seizure-sensitive biosignals in the ambulatory setting presents a number of challenges. We herein provide an overview of these challenges and current technological landscape of mHealth devices for seizure detection. Specifically, we display, which types of sensor modalities and analytical methods are available, and give insight into current clinical practice guidelines, main outcomes of clinical validation studies, and discuss how to evaluate device performance at point-of-care facilities. We then address pitfalls which may arise in patient compliance and the need to design solutions adapted to user experience.

Multi-Level Optimization of an Ultra-Low Power BrainWave System for Non-Convulsive Seizure Detection

We present a systematic evaluation and optimization of a complex bio-medical signal processing application on the BrainWave prototype system, targeted towards ambulatory EEG monitoring within a tiny power budget of 1 mW. The considered BrainWave processor is completely programmable, while maintaining energy-efficiency by means of a Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Array (CGRA). This is demonstrated through the mapping and evaluation of a state-of-the-art non-convulsive epileptic seizure detection algorithm, while ensuring real-time operation and seizure detection accuracy. Exploiting the CGRA leads to an energy reduction of 73.1%, compared to a highly tuned software implementation (SW-only). A total of 9 complex kernels were benchmarked on the CGRA, resulting in an average 4.7 × speedup and average 4.4 × energy savings over highly tuned SW-only implementations. The BrainWave processor is implemented in 28-nm FDSOI technology with 80 kB of Foundry-provided SRAM. By exploiting near-threshold computing for the logic and voltage-stacking to minimize on-chip voltage-conversion overhead, additional 15.2% and 19.5% energy savings are obtained, respectively. At the Minimum-Energy-Point (MEP) (223 μW, 8 MHz) we report a measured state-of-the-art 90.6% system conversion efficiency, while executing the epileptic seizure detection in real-time.