Validation of Multiple Sleep Latency Test for the diagnosis of pediatric narcolepsy type 1

Narcolepsy and rapid eye movement sleep

Since the first description of narcolepsy at the end of the 19th Century, great progress has been made. The disease is nowadays distinguished as narcolepsy type 1 and type 2. In the 1960s, the discovery of rapid eye movement sleep at sleep onset led to improved understanding of core sleep-related disease symptoms of the disease (excessive daytime sleepiness with early occurrence of rapid eye movement sleep, sleep-related hallucinations, sleep paralysis, rapid eye movement parasomnia), as possible dysregulation of rapid eye movement sleep, and cataplexy resembling an intrusion of rapid eye movement atonia during wake. The relevance of non-sleep-related symptoms, such as obesity, precocious puberty, psychiatric and cardiovascular morbidities, has subsequently been recognized. The diagnostic tools have been improved, but sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods on polysomnography and Multiple Sleep Latency Test remain key criteria. The pathogenic mechanisms of narcolepsy type 1 have been partly elucidated after the discovery of strong HLA class II association and orexin/hypocretin deficiency, a neurotransmitter that is involved in altered rapid eye movement sleep regulation. Conversely, the causes of narcolepsy type 2, where cataplexy and orexin deficiency are absent, remain unknown. Symptomatic medications to treat patients with narcolepsy have been developed, and management has been codified with guidelines, until the recent promising orexin-receptor agonists. The present review retraces the steps of the research on narcolepsy that linked the features of the disease with rapid eye movement sleep abnormality, and those that do not appear associated with rapid eye movement sleep.

Diagnostic value of nocturnal sleep-onset rapid eye movement sleep period for narcolepsy type 1 and 2 in a tertiary sleep centre

BACKGROUND

A nocturnal sleep-onset rapid eye movement period (nSOREMP) is considered diagnostic for narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) if typical cataplexy is also present. The diagnostic value of nSOREMP for narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) is less clear partly because it has not been studied in large groups representing the population attending a sleep centre. We examined the prevalence of nSOREMP and its diagnostic value for narcolepsy in clinical practice.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical records and nocturnal polysomnography (nPSG) findings of all people who attended a Dutch sleep-wake centre between 2015 and 2019. The prevalence of nSOREMPs was examined across twelve sleep disorders. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of nSOREMP for NT1 and NT2 were estimated.

RESULTS

Of 1348 adults (aged ≥18) and 177 children (aged 12-17) included, nSOREMPs were most prevalent in children with NT1 or NT2 (68.3 %) followed by adults with NT1 (47.0 %), NT2 (46.0 %), insufficient sleep syndrome (ISS, 11.4 %), periodic limb movement disorder (7.9 %), chronic insomnia (2.7 %), sleep apnea (2.6 %) and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH, 2.4 %). A nSOREMP was highly specific for NT1 (96 %) and NT2 (93 %) but had limited positive predictive value (NT1: 52.4 % and NT2: 9.7 %) in adults.

CONCLUSIONS

A nSOREMP can only be used as a diagnostic for NT1 and NT2 in the presence of other specific hallmarks, such as cataplexy in NT1. Beyond that, it has no diagnostic value in adults as it is also present in other, more prevalent sleep disorders, with the highest occurrence in ISS.

CSF-profile and hypocretin levels in children with narcolepsy type 1 and 2

BACKGROUND

Narcolepsy is a rare neurological disease caused by dysfunction of hypocretin-producing neurons. Hypocretin concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of less than 110 pg/ml are considered pathological in adults.

OBJECTIVES

To compare hypocretin levels of children with narcolepsy type 1, type 2 and disease control groups, in addition to a detailed CSF analysis, clinical and polysomnographic parameters.

METHODS

In a retrospective, cross-sectional study, children diagnosed with narcolepsy based on clinical and polysomnographic parameters, who received a CSF analysis and hypocretin measurement, in addition to controls, were included. CSF was analyzed for the presence of cells, total protein, lactate, intrathecal synthesis of antibodies against measles, rubella and/or varicella zoster, and oligoclonal bands. All children had a complete sleep study including a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT).

RESULTS

49 children with narcolepsy type 1, 15 children with type 2 and 37 children with other (suspected) neurological diseases were included. CSF routine analysis did not reveal any differences between the three groups. All children with narcolepsy type 1 had hypocretin levels of less than 110 pg/ml (range: 10-101 pg/ml). Hypocretin levels in type 2 patients ranged from 43 to 436 pg/ml (median 157 pg/ml). The median hypocretin level in the control cohort was 365 pg/ml (range: 153-583 pg/ml). In 4 children with narcolepsy type 2 the diagnosis was changed to narcolepsy level 1 because of a CSF hypocretin level of less than 110 pg/ml according to the recently proposed criteria, which consider the measurement of hypocretin in CSF.

CONCLUSION

Children with narcolepsy type 1 showed significantly lower CSF hypocretin levels than children with narcolepsy type 2 and controls. As suggested by the recently published narcolepsy criteria, hypocretin levels of less than 110 pg/ml should be used as an additional criterion for the presence of narcolepsy type 1 in children.

Exploring sleep characteristics in Chinese patients with narcolepsy: insights from the nocturnal sleep onset rapid eye movement period (nSOREMP)

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the unique characteristics and clinical significance of the nocturnal sleep onset rapid eye movement period (nSOREMP) in the Chinese population with narcolepsy, enhancing our understanding and management of the disorder globally.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis investigated narcolepsy in Chinese patients from six hospitals, using the International Classification of Sleep Disorders. A parallel retrospective analysis of the Chinese Clinical Sleep Database focused on polysomnography records was conducted to evaluate nSOREMP prevalence in other sleep disorders.

RESULTS

The study found a 2.51% nSOREMP prevalence in other sleep disorders in the Chinese Clinical Sleep Database. Significant differences in age, N2 and rapid eye movement percentages, rapid eye movement latency, and various indexes were noted among patients with narcolepsy with or without nSOREMP and other sleep disorders with nSOREMP in the Chinese Clinical Sleep Database. nSOREMP prevalence in narcolepsy type 1 was 33.33% and in narcolepsy type 2 was 28.30%. Noteworthy disparities in narcolepsy type 1 included N2 percentages, rapid eye movement latency, and SOREMPs on Multiple Sleep Latency Test. In narcolepsy type 2, differences were significant for age, sleep latency, N2 and rapid eye movement latencies, arousal index, mean sleep latency on the Multiple Sleep Latency Test, and Multiple Sleep Latency Test SOREMPs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the distinct characteristics of nSOREMP in the Chinese population. Patients exhibiting symptoms suggestive of the onset of narcolepsy are advised to undergo a Multiple Sleep Latency Test, irrespective of the occurrence of SOREMP during nocturnal polysomnography.

CITATION

Zeng S, Feng F, Li W, et al. Exploring sleep characteristics in Chinese patients with narcolepsy: insights from the nocturnal sleep onset rapid eye movement period (nSOREMP). J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(8):1349-1355.

Effectiveness of an intervention program on physical activity in children with narcolepsy type 1

OBJECTIVES

Physical activity (PA) is recommended as part of the management of narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). This study aimed at 1) characterizing PA in children and adolescents treated for NT1 using objective and subjective measurements, 2) evaluating how PA is associated with NT1 symptoms and comorbidities, and 3) evaluating the effects of an Adapted Physical Activity (APA) program on PA and clinical characteristics.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Patients with NT1 from the National Reference Center of Narcolepsy (Lyon, France) were consecutively included in an APA intervention protocol. Narcolepsy symptoms and comorbidities were collected using standardized questionnaires and sustained attention was evaluated using the Bron-Lyon Attention Stability Test before and after the four-week APA intervention. PA was measured objectively using actigraphy throughout the study.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven NT1 patients were included (median age 14.7 years [8.3-18.4], cataplexy 88.9%, obesity 37.0%). At baseline, 52.4% of the patients had satisfactory PA levels according to international recommendations. Patients with leisure-time PA (LTPA) showed higher quality of life than patients without. 45% of the patients increased PA during the intervention compared to baseline. These responsive patients had more depressive feelings and tended to have lower objective PA than non-responsive patients at baseline. No significant correlation was found between PA levels before and during the intervention and other clinical data.

CONCLUSIONS

Most children with NT1 showed satisfying PA levels despite their daytime sleepiness. LTPA engagement was associated with higher quality of life. An APA intervention could be effective in children with narcolepsy, especially for those with depressive feelings.

Objective evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is multifactorial. It combines, among other things, an excessive propensity to fall asleep ("physiological sleepiness") and a continuous non-imperative sleepiness (or drowsiness/hypo-arousal) leading to difficulties remaining awake and maintaining sustained attention and vigilance over the long term ("manifest sleepiness"). There is no stand-alone biological measure of EDS. EDS measures can either capture the severity of physiological sleepiness, which corresponds to the propensity to fall asleep, or the severity of manifest sleepiness, which corresponds to behavioral consequences of sleepiness and reduced vigilance. Neuropsychological tests (The psychomotor vigilance task (PVT), Oxford Sleep Resistance Test (OSLeR), Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART)) explore manifest sleepiness through several sustained attention tests but the lack of normative values and standardized protocols make the results difficult to interpret and use in clinical practice. Neurophysiological tests explore the two main aspects of EDS, i.e. the propensity to fall asleep (Multiple sleep latency test, MSLT) and the capacity to remain awake (Maintenance of wakefulness test, MWT). The MSLT and the MWT are widely used in clinical practice. The MSLT is recognized as the "gold standard" test for measuring the severity of the propensity to fall asleep and it is a diagnostic criterion for narcolepsy. The MWT measures the ability to stay awake. The MWT is not a diagnostic test as it is recommended only to evaluate the evolution of EDS and efficacy of EDS treatment. Even if some efforts to standardize the protocols for administration of these tests have been ongoing, MSLT and MWT have numerous limitations: age effect, floor or ceiling effects, binding protocol, no normal or cutoff value (or determined in small samples), and no or low test-retest values in some pathologies. Moreover, the recommended electrophysiological set-up and the determination of sleep onset using the 30‑sec epochs scoring rule show some limitations. New, more precise neurophysiological techniques should aim to detect very brief periods of physiological sleepiness and, in the future, the brain local phenomenon of sleepiness likely to underpin drowsiness, which could be called "physiological drowsiness".

Is there a role for repeating the multiple sleep latency test across childhood when initially non-diagnostic?

BACKGROUND

The gold standard investigation for central disorders of hypersomnolence is the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT). As the clinical features of these disorders of hypersomnolence evolve with time in children, clinicians may consider repeating a previously non-diagnostic MSLT. Currently there are no guidelines available regards the utility and timing of repeating paediatric MSLTs.

METHODS

Retrospective review of children aged 3-18years with ≥2MSLTs between 2005 and 2022. Narcolepsy was defined as mean sleep latency (MSL) <8min with ≥2 sleep onset REM (SOREM); idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) was defined as MSL <8min with <2 SOREM. MSLTs not meeting these criteria were labelled non-diagnostic.

RESULTS

19 children (9 female) with initial non-diagnostic MSLT underwent repeat MSLT, with 6 proceeding to a 3rd MSLT following 2 non-diagnostic MSLTs. The 2nd MSLT resulted in diagnosis in 6/19 (32 %) (3 narcolepsy, 3 IH); and 2/6 (33 %) 3rd MSLT were diagnostic (2 IH). Median age at initial MSLT was 7.5y (range 3.4-17.8y), with repeat performed after median of 2.9y (range 0.9-8.2y), and 3rd after a further 1.9 years (range 1.2-4.2y). Mean change in MSL on repeat testing was -2min (range -15.5min to +4.9min, p = 0.18). Of the 8 diagnostic repeat MSLTs, in addition to the MSL falling below 8 min, 2 children also developed ≥2 SOREM that had not been previously present.

CONCLUSIONS

A third of repeat MSLTs became diagnostic, suggesting repeat MSLT should be considered in childhood if clinical suspicion persists. Further work needs to address the ideal interval between MSLTs and diagnostic cut-points specific to the paediatric population.

Sleepy Kids: are the current diagnostic criteria for multiple sleep latency tests enough?

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is common in childhood and is currently quantified using adult criteria on a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). This study aimed to describe paediatric MSLT results, particularly focussing on a previously proposed alternative mean sleep latency (MSL) threshold for children of 12 min, and assess the impact of a 5th nap. We performed a retrospective analysis of MSLTs at a single paediatric centre from 2004 to 2021. Narcolepsy was defined as a mean sleep latency (MSL) ≤8min with ≥2 sleep onset REM (SOREM) periods. Idiopathic Hypersomnia (IH) was defined as a MSL ≤8min with <2 SOREMs. An ambiguous MSLT result was defined as a MSL 8-12min and/or ≥2 SOREM periods. Of 214 MSLTs [50 % female, median age 14.0y (range 3.3-20.1y)], narcolepsy was diagnosed in 48 (22 %), IH in 22 (10 %) and the result was ambiguous in 44 (21 %). Those with ambiguous MSLT results were older (15.6 vs 13.4y, p = 0.006) with a higher proportion of females (61 % vs 35 %, p = 0.01) in comparison to the narcolepsy group. A 5th nap was performed in 60 (28 %) of MSLTs and only changed the outcome in one case. In conclusion, MSLT results are borderline in 21 % of paediatric cases, suggesting that current adult diagnostic criteria may miss narcolepsy and IH in children. A 5th nap usually makes no difference or increases the MSL, suggesting that a four nap MSLT protocol could be used apart from rare cases where the result is borderline after the 4th nap.

Role of Daytime Continuous Polysomnography in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Narcolepsy Type 1

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is still largely underdiagnosed or diagnosed too late in children. Difficulties in obtaining rapid and reliable diagnostic evaluations of the condition in clinical practice partially explain this problem. Predictors of NT1 include cataplexy and sleep-onset REM periods (SOREMPs), documented during nocturnal polysomnography (N-PSG) or through the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), although low CSF hypocretin-1 (CSF hcrt-1) is the definitive biological disease marker. Obtaining reliable MSLT results is not always feasible in children; therefore, this study aimed to validate daytime continuous polysomnography (D-PSG) as an alternative diagnostic tool.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive patients aged younger than 18 years (112 with NT1; 25 with other hypersomnias, including narcolepsy type 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia; and 63 with subjective excessive daytime sleepiness) were randomly split into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 133) for the identification of diagnostic markers and group 2 (n = 67) for the validation of the detected markers. The D-PSG data collected included the number of spontaneous naps, total sleep time, and the number of daytime SOREMPs (d-SOREMP). D-PSG data were tested against CSF hcrt-1 deficiency (NT1 diagnosis) as the gold standard using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in group 1. ROC diagnostic performances of single and combined D-PSG parameters were tested in group 1 and validated in group 2.

RESULTS

In group 1, the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.96) for d-SOREMPs, 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.89) for the number of spontaneous naps, and 0.70 (95% CI 0.60-0.79) for total sleep time. A d-SOREMP count ≥1 (sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 72%), coupled with a diurnal total sleep time above 60 minutes (sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 91%), identified NT1 in group 1 with high reliability (area under the ROC curve of 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.97). These results were confirmed in the validation group with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.97).

DISCUSSION

D-PSG recording is an easily performed, cost-effective, and reliable tool for identifying NT1 in children. Further studies should confirm its validity with home D-PSG monitoring. These alternative procedures could be used to confirm NT1 diagnosis and curtail diagnostic delay.

Narcolepsies, update in 2023

Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and type 2 (NT2), also known as narcolepsy with and without cataplexy, are sleep disorders that benefited from major scientific advances over the last two decades. NT1 is caused by the loss of hypothalamic neurons producing orexin/hypocretin, a neurotransmitter regulating sleep and wake, which can be measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A low CSF level of hypocretin-1/orexin-A is a highly specific and sensitive biomarker, sufficient to diagnose NT1. Orexin-deficiency is responsible for the main NT1 symptoms: sleepiness, cataplexy, disrupted nocturnal sleep, sleep-related hallucinations, and sleep paralysis. In the absence of a lumbar puncture, the diagnosis is based on neurophysiological tests (nocturnal and diurnal) and the presence of the pathognomonic symptom cataplexy. In the revised version of the International Classification of sleep Disorders, 3rd edition (ICSD-3-TR), a sleep onset rapid eye movement sleep (REM) period (SOREMP) (i.e. rapid occurrence of REM sleep) during the previous polysomnography may replace the diurnal multiple sleep latency test, when clear-cut cataplexy is present. A nocturnal SOREMP is very specific but not sensitive enough, and the diagnosis of cataplexy is usually based on clinical interview. It is thus of crucial importance to define typical versus atypical cataplectic attacks, and a list of clinical features and related degrees of certainty is proposed in this paper (expert opinion). The time frame of at least three months of evolution of sleepiness to diagnose NT1 was removed in the ICSD-3-TR, when clear-cut cataplexy or orexin-deficiency are established. However, it was kept for NT2 diagnosis, a less well-characterized disorder with unknown clinical course and absence of biolo biomarkers; sleep deprivation, shift working and substances intake being major differential diagnoses. Treatment of narcolepsy is nowadays only symptomatic, but the upcoming arrival of non-peptide orexin receptor-2 agonists should be a revolution in the management of these rare sleep diseases.

Evaluation of hypersomnolence: From symptoms to diagnosis, a multidimensional approach

Hypersomnolence is a major public health issue given its high frequency, its impact on academic/occupational functioning and on accidentology, as well as its heavy socio-economic burden. The positive and aetiological diagnosis is crucial, as it determines the therapeutic strategy. It must consider the following aspects: i) hypersomnolence is a complex concept referring to symptoms as varied as excessive daytime sleepiness, excessive need for sleep, sleep inertia, or drowsiness, all of which warrant specific dedicated investigations; ii) the boundary between physiological and abnormal hypersomnolence is blurred, since most symptoms can be encountered in the general population to varying degrees without being considered as pathological, meaning that their severity, frequency, context of occurrence and related impairment need to be carefully assessed; iii) investigation of hypersomnolence relies on scales/questionnaires as well as behavioural and neurophysiological tests, which measure one or more dimensions, keeping in mind the possible discrepancy between objective and subjective assessment; iv) aetiological reasoning is driven by knowledge of the main sleep regulation mechanisms, epidemiology, and associated symptoms. The need to assess hypersomnolence is growing, both for its management, and for assessing the efficacy of treatments. The landscape of tools available for investigating hypersomnolence is constantly evolving, in parallel with research into sleep physiology and technical advances. These investigations face the challenges of reconciling subjective perception and objective data, making tools accessible to as many people as possible and predicting the risk of accidents.

Sleep Disorders in Childhood

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a comprehensive review of pediatric sleep disorders including the clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing, insomnia, parasomnias, restless sleep disorder, restless legs syndrome, narcolepsy in childhood, and Kleine-Levin syndrome.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Our understanding of pediatric sleep pathophysiology continues to evolve, and diagnostic and treatment modalities have expanded. A low-sodium oxybate formulation was approved in July 2020 in the United States to treat cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in patients 7 years old and older with narcolepsy. A validated pediatric hypersomnolence survey for pediatric narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia with high sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability is now available.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

The clinical presentation, diagnostics, and treatment of children with sleep disorders differ from those of adults. Untreated sleep disorders in childhood can lead to adverse physical and psychological consequences in adults. Correctly diagnosing and treating sleep disorders in youth can prevent a significant burden of disease in adulthood.

Metabolic disturbances in children with narcolepsy: a retrospective study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) in children with narcolepsy and to evaluate their clinical and sleep characteristics according to the different components of MS.

METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of 58 de novo children with narcolepsy (median age: 12.7 years, 48.3% of boys). The recently published MS criteria in a French population of children were used. Clinical and sleep characteristics were compared between groups with different components of MS.

RESULTS

MS was present in 17.2% of children with narcolepsy, among whom 79.3% presented with high homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), 25.9% with high body mass index, 24.1% with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and 12.1% with high triglycerides. Patients with at least two MS components had more night eating behaviors and tended to have lower percentage of slow-wave sleep and more fragmented sleep. On multiple sleep latency test, they had shorter mean sleep latencies to rapid eye movement (REM), non-REM sleep and tended to have more sleep onset REM periods (SOREMPs) than those with less than two MS components.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin resistance was found to be the core metabolic disturbance in obese as well as in nonobese children with narcolepsy. Children with narcolepsy with at least two MS components presented a more severe daytime sleepiness and a higher prevalence of night-eating behaviors than those with less than two MS components. Such children might benefit from early evaluation and management in order to prevent future complications.

Pharmacological options for narcolepsy: are they the way forward?

INTRODUCTION

Narcolepsy is an under-recognized, rare neurologic disorder of hypersomnolence that is associated with increased mortality and medical and psychiatric co-morbidities. Narcolepsy exerts a substantial economic burden on patients and society. There is currently no cure, and life-long symptomatic therapy is needed. Available drugs do not modify the disease course.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript provides an overview of narcolepsy symptoms, diagnosis, pathophysiology, current pharmacotherapies, and emerging treatments. Gaps and unresolved issues in diagnosis and management of narcolepsy are discussed to answer whether pharmacological options are the way forward.

EXPERT OPINION

Diagnostic criteria for narcolepsy (ICSD-3) need revision and greater clarity. Improved recognition of cataplexy and other symptoms through educational outreach, new biomarkers, improved test scoring through artificial intelligence algorithms, and use of machine learning may facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment. Pharmacological options need improved symptomatic therapy in addition to targeted therapies that address the loss of hypocretin signaling. Optimal narcolepsy care also needs a better understanding of the pathophysiology, recognition of the different phenotypes in narcolepsy, identification of at-risk individuals and early recognition of symptoms, better diagnostic tools, and a database for research and disease monitoring of treatment, side-effects, and comorbidities.

Narcolepsy and Idiopathic Hypersomnia

Narcolepsy types 1 and 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia are primary Central Nervous System (CNS) disorders of hypersomnolence characterized by profound daytime sleepiness and/or excessive sleep need. Onset of symptoms begins typically in childhood or adolescence, and children can have unique presentations compared with adults. Narcolepsy type 1 is likely caused by immune-mediated loss of orexin (hypocretin) neurons in the hypothalamus; however, the causes of narcolepsy type 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia are unknown. Existing treatments improve daytime sleepiness and cataplexy but there is no cure for these disorders.

Safety and efficacy of pitolisant in children aged 6 years or older with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Narcolepsy is a life-long disorder characterised by excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy, often arising in childhood or adolescence. Pitolisant, a selective histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist, has been approved in Europe and USA for adults with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy, with a favourable safety profile. This phase 3 study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pitolisant in children with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy.

METHODS

For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multisite study, we recruited patients aged 6-17 years with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in 11 sleep centres in five countries (Italy, France, Netherlands, Russia, and Finland). Participants were required to have a Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale score of 15 or greater and to have not received psychostimulants for at least 14 days before enrolment; participants who needed anticataplectics (including sodium oxybate) were required to have been on a stable dose for at least 1 month. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with pitolisant or placebo in a 2:1 ratio at the end of screening. Randomisation was stratified by study centre and treatment was allocated using an interactive web response system. After a 4-week screening period including a 2-week baseline period, patients entered in a 4-week individual up-titration scheme from 5 mg a day to a maximum of 40 mg a day of pitolisant or placebo; treatment was administered at a stable dose for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week placebo period. For the primary analysis, we assessed pitolisant versus placebo using change in the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (UNS) total score from baseline to the end of double-blind period in the full analysis set, defined as all randomly allocated patients who received at least one dose of treatment and who had at least one baseline UNS value. A decrease in the UNS total score reflects a reduction in both excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. All adverse events were assessed in the safety population, defined as all participants who took at least one dose of study medication. An open-label follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02611687.

FINDINGS

Between June 6, 2016, and April 3, 2021, we screened 115 participants and 110 were randomly assigned (mean age 12·9 [SD 3·0] years, 61 [55%] male, and 90 [82%] with cataplexy; 72 assigned to pitolisant and 38 to placebo); 107 (70 receiving pitolisant and 37 receiving placebo) completed the double-blind period. The mean adjusted difference in UNS total score from baseline to the end of the double-blind period was -6·3 (SE 1·1) in the pitolisant group and -2·6 (1·4) in the placebo group (least squares mean difference -3·7; 95% CI -6·4 to -1·0, p=0·007). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 22 (31%) of 72 patients in the pitolisant group and 13 (34%) of 38 patients in the placebo group. The most frequently reported adverse events (affecting ≥5% of patients) in either group were headache (14 [19%] in the pitolisant group and three [8%] in the placebo group) and insomnia (five [7%] in the pitolisant group and one [3%] in the placebo group).

INTERPRETATION

Pitolisant treatment resulted in an improvement in narcolepsy symptoms in children, although the UNS was not validated for use in children with narcolepsy when our study began. The safety profile was similar to that reported in adults but further studies are needed to confirm long-term safety.

FUNDING

Bioprojet.

Sleepiness in adults: An umbrella review of a complex construct

Sleepiness involves many dimensions that require investigation. Since sleepiness is often defined operationally, we exhaustively inventoried all the assessment tools designed to measure it in an umbrella review, without any preconceptions, i.e. a review of reviews. We included all reviews and systematic reviews related to sleepiness assessment tools published up to March 2021. Three investigators independently assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion and identified 36 relevant reviews. In total, 99 tools were identified and classified into 8 categories. We classified them depending on their category, their publication year and the number of mentions in the 36 included reviews. The 6 most frequently cited were the Epworth sleepiness scale, the multiple sleep latency test, the maintenance of wakefulness test, the Stanford sleepiness scale, the Karolinska sleepiness scale, and the psychomotor vigilance task. Despite the limitation that we may have missed some recently developed tools, this historical perspective on sleepiness measurement is a first step toward a better delineation of the different dimensions underlying the constructs of sleepiness, and will serve as a basis for further discussion in the clinical and research sleep community.

Approach to a sleepy child: Diagnosis and treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in children and adolescents

The aim of this review is to give updated information to pediatric neurologists on the correct diagnostic approach and treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in children and adolescents. Due to the change in the society habits, EDS is becoming an emerging problem for the health system. At the present there are few articles specifically devoted to the evaluation of EDS. EDS is often reported in several manuscripts as a side effect of other sleep disorders (obstructive sleep apnea, circadian disorders, etc.) or of the use of drugs or of the substance abuse or as a consequence of bad sleep habits and poor sleep hygiene. EDS, especially in children, may manifest with paradoxical symptoms like hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsiveness. However, common sign of EDS in children are the propensity to sleep longer than usual, the difficulty waking up in the morning, and falling asleep frequently during the day in monotonous situation. The diagnosis should include subjective (sleep diaries, questionnaires) and objective (polysomnography, multiple sleep latency test, etc.) instruments to avoid misdiagnosis. Narcolepsy is the most studied central disorder of hypersomnolence, and it is a predominantly pediatric disease with a peak age of onset in prepuberty but the diagnosis is often delayed especially in mild forms. The early and correct treatment of narcolepsy and of other form of EDS is extremely important since late and inappropriate treatments can affect the psychosocial development of the children and adolescents.

Clinical considerations for the diagnosis of idiopathic hypersomnia

Idiopathic hypersomnia is a sleep disorder of neurologic origin characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, with sleep inertia, long, unrefreshing naps, and prolonged nighttime sleep being key symptoms in many patients. Idiopathic hypersomnia is described in the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, 3rd Edition as a central disorder of hypersomnolence with distinct clinical features and diagnostic criteria; however, confirming the diagnosis of idiopathic hypersomnia is often challenging. Diagnosis of idiopathic hypersomnia is based on objective sleep testing and the presence of associated clinical features but may be difficult for clinicians to recognize and correctly diagnose because of its low prevalence, clinical heterogeneity, and symptoms, which are similar to those of other sleep disorders. The testing required for diagnosis of idiopathic hypersomnia also presents logistical barriers, and reliability of objective sleep measures is suboptimal. The pathophysiology of idiopathic hypersomnia remains unknown. In this review, clinical considerations related to the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of idiopathic hypersomnia will be discussed, including perspectives from the European Union and United States.

Sleep and Psychosocial Characteristics of Children with Narcolepsy According to Their Intellectual Profile: A Case–Control Study

Adequate intellectual abilities are a protective factor for psychosocial adjustments in chronic disorders. The main objective of this study was to assess the cognitive abilities, sleep, and psychosocial characteristics of children with narcolepsy compared to controls, according to their intellectual profile. Children underwent a polysomnography, completed an intellectual ability assessment, and filled out standardized questionnaires. The group with an intelligence quotient (IQ) in the area of high intellectual potential (high IQ, HIQ) consisted of 25 children with narcolepsy (HIQ-N, 40% boys, median age 11.5 years, 48% with obesity, 60% under treatment) and 25 controls (HIQ-C, 68% boys, median age 11.7 years). Compared to HIQ-C, HIQ-N had a lower perceptual reasoning index and fewer conduct disorders. The group with an IQ in the normal range (NIQ) consisted of 22 children with narcolepsy (NIQ-N, 55% boys, median age 12.1 years, 59% with obesity, 64% under treatment) and 21 controls (NIQ-C, 68% boys, median age 10 years). NIQ-N presented the same intellectual profile as NIQ-C but reported more school difficulties. In children with HIQ, those with narcolepsy appear to have a different cognitive profile than controls. NIQ seems to predict a greater impact of narcolepsy on daily-life functioning.

Narcolepsy in Children: Sleep disorders in children, A rapidly evolving field seeking consensus

Narcolepsy is a life-long sleep disorder with two distinct subtypes, narcolepsy type I and narcolepsy type II. It is now well recognized that the loss of hypocretin neurons underlies the pathogenesis of narcolepsy type I, however, the pathogenesis of narcolepsy type II is currently unknown. Both genetic and environmental factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of narcolepsy. There is increasing evidence that autoimmune processes may play a critical role in the loss of hypocretin neurons. Infections especially streptococcus and influenza have been proposed as a potential trigger for the autoimmune-mediated mechanism. Several recent studies have shown increased cases of pediatric narcolepsy following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. The increased cases in Europe seem to be related to a specific type of H1N1 influenza vaccination (Pandemrix), while the increased cases in China are related to influenza infection. Children with narcolepsy can have an unusual presentation at disease onset including complex motor movements which may lead to delayed diagnosis. All classic narcolepsy tetrads are present in only a small proportion of children. The diagnosis of narcolepsy is confirmed by either obtaining cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin or overnight sleep study with the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). There are limitations of using MSLT in young children such that a negative MSLT test cannot exclude narcolepsy. HLA markers have limited utility in narcolepsy, but it may be useful in young children with clinical suspicion of narcolepsy. For management, both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments are important in the management of narcolepsy. Pharmacotherapy is primarily aimed to address excessive daytime sleepiness and REM-related symptoms such as cataplexy. In addition to pharmacotherapy, routine screening of behavioral and psychosocial issues is warranted to identify patients who would benefit from bio-behavior intervention.

Characterization of rapid weight gain phenotype in children with narcolepsy

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the rapid weight gain (RWG) phenotype associated with the onset of childhood narcolepsy and to determine whether it could constitute a marker of severity of the disease.

METHODS

RWG was defined using the BMI z-score slope reported to one year (>0.67 SD) from symptom onset to disease diagnosis. We compared the clinical, metabolic, and sleep characteristics between patients with or without RWG at diagnosis. Pharmacological management, anthropometric, and clinical progression were also evaluated during the follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 84 de novo narcoleptic pediatric patients were included; their median age at diagnosis was 12.0 years; 59.5% boys, 90.5% cataplexy, and 98.7% HLA-DQB1*06:02, 57% had RWG profile. RWG patients were younger at diagnosis than non-RWG patients, despite a shorter diagnostic delay. They had a higher BMI z-score and a higher prevalence of obesity at diagnosis, but not at symptom onset, and higher adapted Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Insomnia Severity Index scores than non-RWG patients. No differences on nocturnal polysomnography and multiple sleep latency tests were found between groups at disease diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 5 years, RWG patients still had a higher BMI z-score and a higher prevalence of obesity despite benefiting from the same therapeutic management and displaying improvement in sleepiness and school difficulties.

CONCLUSIONS

Narcoleptic RWG patients were younger, sleepier, and the prevalence of obesity was higher at diagnosis despite a shorter diagnostic delay than that of non-RWG patients. These patients had also a higher risk of developing a long-term obesity, despite a positive progression of their narcoleptic symptoms. RGW could then represent a maker of a more severe phenotype of childhood narcolepsy, which should inspire a prompt and more offensive management to prevent obesity and its complications.

50th anniversary of the ESRS in 2022-JSR special issue

This article addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, pathophysiology and management of narcolepsy type 1 and 2, with a focus on recent findings. A low level of hypocretin-1/orexin-A in the cerebrospinal fluid is sufficient to diagnose narcolepsy type 1, being a highly specific and sensitive biomarker, and the irreversible loss of hypocretin neurons is responsible for the main symptoms of the disease: sleepiness, cataplexy, sleep-related hallucinations and paralysis, and disrupted nocturnal sleep. The process responsible for the destruction of hypocretin neurons is highly suspected to be autoimmune, or dysimmune. Over the last two decades, remarkable progress has been made for the understanding of these mechanisms that were made possible with the development of new techniques. Conversely, narcolepsy type 2 is a less well-defined disorder, with a variable phenotype and evolution, and few reliable biomarkers discovered so far. There is a dearth of knowledge about this disorder, and its aetiology remains unclear and needs to be further explored. Treatment of narcolepsy is still nowadays only symptomatic, targeting sleepiness, cataplexy and disrupted nocturnal sleep. However, new psychostimulants have been recently developed, and the upcoming arrival of non-peptide hypocretin receptor-2 agonists should be a revolution in the management of this rare sleep disease, and maybe also for disorders beyond narcolepsy.

Sleep Disturbances in Pediatric Craniopharyngioma: A Systematic Review

Craniopharyngiomas are rare brain tumors of the sellar region and are the most common non-neuroepithelial intracerebral neoplasm in children. Despite a low-grade histologic classification, craniopharyngiomas can have a severe clinical course due to hypothalamic involvement. The hypothalamus plays a crucial role in regulating vital functions, and it is a critical component of the sleep-wake regulatory system. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on sleep disorders in patients with craniopharyngioma to unravel their underlying mechanisms and identify possible therapeutic strategies. A comprehensive electronic literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA^® statement. Extensively published, peer-reviewed articles involving patients with childhood craniopharyngioma and focused on this specific topic were considered eligible for inclusion. Thirty-two articles were included; a high prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness was reported in CP patients, with wide variability (25–100%) depending on the diagnostic method of detection (25–43% by subjective measures, 50–100% by objective investigations). In particular, secondary narcolepsy was reported in 14–35%, sleep-disordered breathing in 4–46%. Moreover, sleep-wake rhythm dysregulation has been notified, although no prevalence data are available. Possible mechanisms underlying these disorders are discussed, including hypothalamic injury, damage to the suprachiasmatic nucleus, low melatonin levels, hypocretin deficiency, and hypothalamic obesity. The diagnosis and management of sleep disorders and associated comorbidities are challenging. This review summarizes the pathophysiology of sleep disorders in childhood-onset CP and the main treatment options. Finally, a possible diagnostic algorithm in order to accurately identify and treat sleep disorders in these patients is proposed.

Pediatric Sleep Medicine Cases

Purpose of the Review

In this review, we will discuss commonly encountered pediatric sleep disorders, their clinical presentations, evaluation, and management.

Recent Findings

Sleep problems are common complaints in the pediatric population with an estimated prevalence of at least 25%. This review examines frequently seen pediatric sleep disorders including insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, hypersomnolence, circadian rhythm sleep–wake disorders, parasomnias, and movement disorders. Their clinical manifestations vary, but left untreated, these sleep disorders result in significant impairment. A detailed sleep history is key component in the evaluation process. Other useful tools include sleep diaries, questionnaires, and actigraphy. Polysomnography is often required for diagnosis. Treatment varies depending on the underlying sleep disorder. Pharmacologic treatment is often limited due to the lack of studies of safety and efficacy in the pediatric population.

Summary

Sleep disorders are commonly encountered in the pediatric population. Their clinical manifestations vary, though without treatment, many result in significant impairment. Detailed sleep history is an essential part of the evaluation process, though polysomnography is often required. Treatment depends on the underlying diagnosis.

Recommended protocols for the Multiple Sleep Latency Test and Maintenance of Wakefulness Test in adults: guidance from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine

This article updates the American Academy of Sleep Medicine protocols for the administration of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of clinical experts in sleep medicine to review published literature on the performance of these tests since the publication of the 2005 American Academy of Sleep Medicine practice parameter paper. Although no evidence-based changes to the protocols were warranted, the task force made several changes based on consensus. These changes included guidance on patient preparation, medication and substance use, sleep before testing, test scheduling, optimum test conditions, and documentation. This article provides guidance to providers who order and administer the Multiple Sleep Latency Test and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test.

CITATION

Krahn LE, Arand DL, Avidan AY, et al. Recommended protocols for the Multiple Sleep Latency Test and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test in adults: guidance from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(12):2489-2498.

Differential characteristics of repeated polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test parameters in narcolepsy type 1 and type 2 patients: a longitudinal retrospective study

PURPOSE

Narcolepsy is a chronic disorder and its phenotype is dichotomized into narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and narcolepsy type 2 (NT2). The clinical course and pathophysiological mechanisms of these two clinical entities and their differences are not adequately defined. This study aimed to explore the differential longitudinal patterns of polysomnography (PSG) and multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) in NT1 and NT2.

METHODS

In this retrospective study demographic characteristics, PSG, and MSLT parameters at baseline and follow-up were compared between NT1 and NT2 patients. Patients with both follow-up MSLT and PSG were selected for sub-group analysis. Baseline and follow-up MSLT and PSG parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Of 55 patients with narcolepsy, mean follow-up periods were 7.4 ± 3.5 years for NT1 and 5.5 ± 2.9 for NT2. Demographic data showed increased body mass index and prevalence of sleep paralysis in NT1. Baseline PSG characteristics between NT1 and NT2 showed decreased sleep latency (p = 0.016) and REM latency (p = 0.046) in NT1 group when compared with NT2. Nocturnal SOREMP on PSG was more prevalent in NT1 (p = 0.017), and half of NT2 patients with nocturnal SOREMP on PSG changed their diagnoses to NT1. On follow-up PSG, NT1 displayed reductions in sleep stage N2 (p = 0.006) and N3 (p = 0.048), while wake after sleep onset (WASO) (p = 0.023) and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (p = 0.007) were significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

Differential MSLT and PSG characteristics of NT1 and NT2 in at baseline and follow-up indicate that NT1 and NT2 are distinct disease phenotypes, and that they present with a contrasting course of disease.

Combining information on nocturnal rapid eye movement sleep latency and atonia to facilitate diagnosis of pediatric narcolepsy type 1

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) at its onset in children and adolescents is often difficult, with substantial diagnostic delay. We aimed to test and validate the effectiveness of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep latency (REML), the REM sleep atonia index (RAI), and their combination for the automatic identification of pediatric patients with NT1 based on the standard scoring of nocturnal polysomnograms.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 71 pediatric patients with NT1 and 42 controls was subdivided in test and validation cohorts. A novel index (COM) was developed as a nonlinear function of REML and RAI. The effectiveness of REML, RAI, and COM in identifying patients with NT1 was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

REML, RAI, and COM significantly identified patients with NT1 both in the test and validation cohorts. Optimal thresholds that maximized identification accuracy were estimated in the test cohort (REML, 49.5 min; RAI, 0.91; COM, 4.57 AU) and validated in the other cohort. COM performed significantly better in identifying patients with NT1 than either REML or RAI, with ROC area under the curve of 94%-100%, sensitivity 85%-96%, and specificity 92%-100%, and with good night-to-night agreement (Cohen's k = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of REML, RAI, and particularly their combination in the COM index may help shorten diagnostic delay of NT1 in children and adolescents based on the standard scoring of nocturnal polysomnography.

Defining disrupted nighttime sleep and assessing its diagnostic utility for pediatric narcolepsy type 1

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Disrupted nighttime sleep (DNS) is a core narcolepsy symptom of unconsolidated sleep resulting from hypocretin neuron loss. In this study, we define a DNS objective measure and evaluate its diagnostic utility for pediatric narcolepsy type 1 (NT1).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multisite, cross-sectional study of polysomnograms (PSGs) in 316 patients, ages 6-18 years (n = 150 NT1, n = 22 narcolepsy type 2, n = 27 idiopathic hypersomnia, and n = 117 subjectively sleepy subjects). We assessed sleep continuity PSG measures for (1) their associations with subjective and objective daytime sleepiness, daytime sleep onset REM periods (SOREMPs), self-reported disrupted nocturnal sleep and CSF hypocretin levels and (2) their predictive value for NT1 diagnosis. We then combined the best performing DNS measure with nocturnal SOREMP (nSOREMP) to assess the added value to the logistic regression model and the predictive accuracy for NT1 compared with nSOREMP alone.

RESULTS

The Wake/N1 Index (the number of transitions from any sleep stage to wake or NREM stage 1 normalized by total sleep time) was associated with objective daytime sleepiness, daytime SOREMPs, self-reported disrupted sleep, and CSF hypocretin levels (p's < 0.003) and held highest area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) for NT1 diagnosis. When combined with nSOREMP, the DNS index had greater accuracy for diagnosing NT1 (AUC = 0.91 [0.02]) than nSOREMP alone (AUC = 0.84 [0.02], likelihood ratio [LR] test p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Wake/N1 Index is an objective DNS measure that can quantify DNS severity in pediatric NT1. The Wake/N1 Index in combination with or without nSOREMP is a useful sleep biomarker that improves recognition of pediatric NT1 using only the nocturnal PSG.

Intellectual Abilities of Children with Narcolepsy

High cognitive functioning could be a protective factor for school difficulties, behavioral and mood impairments in children with narcolepsy. To investigate this factor, we studied the intellectual abilities of 74 children with narcolepsy (43 boys, 11.7 years old at diagnosis, 91% of cataplexies, 64% obese, 100% HLA positive for DR-DQB1*06:02). All children underwent a one-night polysomnography followed by Multiple Sleep Latency Tests, an evaluation of intelligence quotient (IQ), and filled standardized questionnaires. Thirty-eight percent had high potentialities (HP defined by IQ > 130) and 48% had school difficulties. Using non-parametric tests, we found that HP children reported less difficulties at school and tended to have less impulsivity, conduct, and learning disorders than those without HP. They also tended to be less obese and had less desaturation. Using a multivariate regression analysis, we found an association between the REM sleep percentage and the IQ. REM sleep could be involved in the dynamic changes contributing to the equilibrium of intellectual functioning. This study highlights that despite their frequent school difficulties, narcolepsy per se is unlikely to be a cause of intellectual disability in children. Prompt diagnosis and management of comorbidities such as obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) could improve cognitive and school performances in these children.

Narcolepsy with cataplexy: Does age at diagnosis change the clinical picture?

Objective

To compare symptoms and sleep characteristics in patients diagnosed with narcolepsy‐cataplexy (NC) before and after the age of 18 years.

Methods

De novo patients with NC diagnosis completed a standardized questionnaire and interview, followed by a sleep study. The clinical and sleep measures were compared between patients diagnosed before (46 children, median age: 12 year old) and after (46 adults, median age: 28.5 year old) 18 years of age.

Results

The frequency of obesity (54% vs 17%), night eating (29% vs 7%), parasomnia (89% vs 43%), sleep talking (80% vs 34%), and sleep drunkenness (69% vs 24%) were higher in children than in adults, the frequency of sleep paralysis was lower (20% vs 55%) but the frequency of cataplexy and the severity of sleepiness were not different. Children scored higher than adults at the attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) scale. Depressive feelings affected not differently children (24%) and adults (32%). However, adults had lower quality of life than children. There was no difference between groups for insomnia and fatigue scores. Quality of life was essentially impacted by depressive feelings in both children and adults. Obstructive apnea‐hypopnea index (OAHI) was lower in children with higher mean and minimal oxygen saturation than in adults. No between‐group differences were found at the multiple sleep latency test. The body mass index (z‐score) was correlated with OAHI (r = .32).

Conclusion

At time of NC diagnosis, children have more frequent obesity, night eating, parasomnia, sleep talking, drunkenness, and ADHD symptoms than adults, even if sleepiness and cataplexy do not differ. These differences should be considered to ensure a prompt diagnosis.

Sleep-Wake Disorders in Childhood

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The presentation of sleep issues in childhood differs from the presentation in adulthood and may be more subtle. Sleep issues may affect children differently than adults, and distinct treatment approaches are often used in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sodium oxybate was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in October 2018 for an expanded indication of treatment of sleepiness or cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy type 1 or narcolepsy type 2 aged 7 years or older, with side effect and safety profiles similar to those seen in adults. Restless sleep disorder is a recently proposed entity in which restless sleep, daytime sleepiness, and often iron deficiency are observed, but children do not meet the criteria for restless legs syndrome or periodic limb movement disorder.

SUMMARY

Children's sleep is discussed in this article, including normal sleep patterns and effects of insufficient sleep. Sleep disorders of childhood are reviewed, including insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, parasomnias, narcolepsy, and Kleine-Levin syndrome. Children with neurologic issues or neurodevelopmental disorders frequently have sleep disorders arising from an interaction of heterogeneous factors. Further attention to sleep may often be warranted through a polysomnogram or referral to a pediatric sleep specialist. Sleep disorders may cause indelible effects on children's cognitive functioning, general health, and well-being, and awareness of sleep disorders is imperative for neurologists who treat children.

Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Measurements in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most commonly diagnosed neurodevelopmental disorder in childhood. It is a heterogeneous disorder in terms of clinical presentation that is probably due to the frequent occurrence of comorbidity. Children with ADHD more frequently report sleep disorders (notably delayed sleep phase syndrome) and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) than typically developing children. The aim of this article is to propose a narrative review of the assessment of EDS in the context of ADHD with first a summary of the subjective and objective tools used to measure it. Secondly, perspectives in terms of electroencephalogram (EEG) markers and neurofeedback are proposed. Then, possibilities for new kinds of evaluation are discussed (virtual reality, ecological momentary assessment, etc.). Lastly, we discuss specific clinical situations with EDS in the context of ADHD as links with narcolepsy, the comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders, and the context of sluggish cognitive tempo.

HLA and sleep parameter associations in post-H1N1 narcolepsy type 1 patients and first-degree relatives

Study Objectives

To explore HLA (human leukocyte antigen) in post-H1N1 narcolepsy type 1 patients (NT1), first-degree relatives and healthy controls, and assess HLA associations with clinical and sleep parameters in patients and first-degree relatives.

Methods

Ninety post-H1N1 NT1 patients and 202 of their first-degree relatives were HLA-genotyped (next generation sequencing) and phenotyped (semistructured interviews, Stanford Sleep Questionnaire, polysomnography, and multiple sleep latency test). HLA allele distributions were compared between DQB1*06:02-heterozygous individuals (77 patients, 59 parents, 1230 controls). A subsample (74 patients, 114 relatives) was investigated for associations between HLA-loci and continuous sleep variables using logistic regression. Identified candidate HLA-loci were explored for HLA allele associations with hypnagogic hallucinations and sleep paralysis in 90 patients, and patient allele findings were checked for similar associations in 202 relatives.

Results

DQB1*06:02 heterozygous post-H1N1 NT1 patients (84.4% H1N1-vaccinated) showed several significant HLA associations similar to those reported previously in samples of mainly sporadic NT1, i.e. DQB1*03:01, DRB1*04:01, DRB1*04:02, DRB1*04:07, DRB1*11:04, A*25:01, B*35:03, and B*51:01, and novel associations, i.e. B*14:02, C*01:02, and C*07:01. Parents HLA alleles did not deviate significantly from controls. The HLA-C locus was associated with sleep parameters in patients and relatives. In patients C*02:02 seems to be associated with protective effects against sleep paralysis and hypnagogic hallucinations.

Conclusions

Our findings of similar risk/protective HLA-alleles in post-H1N1 as in previous studies of mainly sporadic narcolepsy support similar disease mechanisms. We also report novel allelic associations. Associations between HLA-C and sleep parameters were seen independent of NT1 diagnosis, supporting involvement of HLA-C in sleep subphenotypes.