MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a review of clinical developments and its management - What's new in 2025?

INTRODUCTION

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) understanding and diagnostic rates are improving. Symptomatic management is still the only option, but many therapeutic approaches are under investigation, some in the clinical trial phase.

AREAS COVERED

Through a comprehensive search in PubMed, the ClinicalTrials.gov website, and the latest abstracts on the topic, the authors review the diagnostic advances and promising treatments, focusing on pharmacological and gene therapy/silencing approaches, and on clinical trial challenges. They also review current CMT management, including rehabilitation, orthotics, and associated symptoms and comorbidities.

EXPERT OPINION

The CMT field is evolving rapidly, with significant advances in genetic diagnosis and disease recognition. International networks and patient organization partnerships are vital for progress, enabling collaboration and large-scale studies. Metabolic neuropathies are relatively easier to target, and interim analysis results from the CMT-SORD trial suggest govorestat may become the first approved CMT drug. Gene therapy shows promise but currently faces safety and targeting challenges; PMP22 silencers for CMT1A are close to being tested in patients. New drugs, such as HDAC6 inhibitors, are also approaching the clinical trial phase, despite existing hurdles. Supportive care, including rehabilitation and orthotics, continues to improve quality of life. There is optimism that within the next decade, approved therapies will reduce disease burden.

Biological biomarkers in muscle diseases relevant for follow-up and evaluation of treatment

Muscle diseases cover a diverse group of disorders that, in most cases, are hereditary. The rarity of the individual muscle diseases provides a challenge for researchers when wanting to establish natural history of the conditions and when trying to develop diagnostic tools, therapies, and outcome measures to evaluate disease progression. With emerging molecular therapies in many genetic muscle diseases, as well as biological therapies for the immune-mediated diseases, biological biomarkers play an important role in both drug development and evaluation. In this review, we focus on the role of biological biomarkers in muscle diseases and discuss their utility as surrogate end points in therapeutic trials. We categorize these as either (i) disease unspecific markers; (ii) markers of specific pathways that may be used for more than one disease; or (iii) disease-specific markers. We also propose that evaluation of specific therapeutic interventions benefits from biological markers that match the intervention.

Clinical Outcome Assessments and Biomarkers in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) encompasses a diverse group of genetic forms of inherited peripheral neuropathy and stands as the most common hereditary neurologic disease worldwide. At present, no disease-modifying treatments exist for any form of CMT. However, promising therapeutic strategies are rapidly emerging, necessitating careful consideration of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) and clinical trial design. In this review, we discuss the challenges and successes over the past 2 decades in efforts to design and validate COAs and disease biomarkers of CMT. Natural history studies and completed clinical trials have underscored the limitations of early clinical scales for CMT, including the neuropathy impairment score, overall neuropathy limitation scale, and CMT neuropathy score. These studies prompted the development of newer, psychometrically supported scales including the CMT neuropathy score version 2, CMT pediatric scale, CMT infant scale, CMT functional outcome measure, and CMT health index. Although promising, many of these scales have yet to be formally tested in longitudinal studies. Given inherent challenges of relying solely on COAs in slowly progressive forms of CMT, there is growing recognition of the need for objective disease biomarkers that could serve as surrogate end points in clinical trials. Among these, MRI muscle fat fraction in the lower extremities has proven the most responsive biomarker to date, although its relationship to functional outcomes and its performance in treatment trials remain uncertain. Serum biomarkers including neurofilament light, transmembrane protease serine 5, specific microRNAs, neural cell adhesion molecule 1, and growth and differentiation factor 15 reliably distinguish patients with CMT from controls, but their responsiveness to effective therapies also remains unknown. Although the optimal combination of outcome measures in CMT has yet to be established, many of the most promising COAs and biomarkers are now being put to the test in ongoing clinical trials. These early studies will also help address other critical clinical trial considerations, such as patient selection and enrollment targets, which will become increasingly important in this exciting new era of bringing the first disease-modifying treatments to people living with CMT.

Navigating the Landscape of CMT1B: Understanding Genetic Pathways, Disease Models, and Potential Therapeutic Approaches

Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1B (CMT1B) is a peripheral neuropathy caused by mutations in the gene encoding myelin protein zero (MPZ), a key component of the myelin sheath in Schwann cells. Mutations in the MPZ gene can lead to protein misfolding, unfolded protein response (UPR), endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, or protein mistrafficking. Despite significant progress in understanding the disease mechanisms, there is currently no effective treatment for CMT1B, with therapeutic strategies primarily focused on supportive care. Gene therapy represents a promising therapeutic approach for treating CMT1B. To develop a treatment and better design preclinical studies, an in-depth understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and animal models is essential. In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of the disease mechanisms, preclinical models, and recent advancements in therapeutic research for CMT1B, while also addressing the existing challenges in the field. This review aims to deepen the understanding of CMT1B and to encourage further research towards the development of effective treatments for CMT1B patients.

Non-fatal outcomes of COVID-19 disease in pediatric organ transplantation associates with down-regulation of senescence pathways

This is a cross-sectional study examining kinetics and durability of immune response in children with solid organ transplants (SOTs) who had COVID-19 disease between November 2020 through June 2022, who were followed for 60-days at a single transplant center. Blood was collected between 1-14 (acute infection), and 15-60 days of a positive PCR (convalescence). SOT children with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) cryopreserved before 2019 were non-infected controls (ctrls). PBMCs stimulated with 15-mer peptides from spike protein and anti-CD49d/anti-CD28. Testing done included mass cytometry, mi-RNA sequencing with confirmatory qPCR. 38 children formed the study cohort, 10 in the acute phase and 8 in the convalescence phase. 20 subjects were non-infected controls. Two subjects had severe disease. Subjects in the acute and convalescent phases were different subjects. The median age and tacrolimus level at blood draw was not significantly different. There was no death, and no subject was lost to follow-up. During acute infection CD57 expression was low in NKT, Th17 effector memory, memory Treg, CD4-CD8-, and γδT cells (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, p = 0.03, p = 0.03, p = 0.004 respectively). The frequencies of NK and Th2 effector memory cells increased (p = 0.01, p = 0.02) during acute infection. Non-switched memory B and CD8 central memory cell frequencies were decreased during acute infection (p = 0.02; p = 0.02), but the decrease in CD8 central memory cells did not persist. CD4-CD8- and CD14 monocyte frequencies increased during recovery (p = 0.03; p = 0.007). Our observations suggest down regulation of CD57 with absence of NK cell contraction protect against death from COVID-19 disease in children with SOTs.

Ultrasensitive assay technology and fluid biomarkers for the evaluation of peripheral nerve disease

The field of biomarker discovery is rapidly expanding. The introduction of ultrasensitive immunoassays and the growing precision of genetic technologies are poised to revolutionise the assessment and monitoring of many diseases. Given the difficulties in imaging and tissue diagnosis, there is mounting interest in serum and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of peripheral neuropathy. Realised and potential fluid biomarkers of peripheral nerve disease include neuronal biomarkers of axonal degeneration, glial biomarkers for peripheral demyelinating disorders, immunopathogenic biomarkers (such as the presence and titre of antibodies or the levels of cytokines) and genetic biomarkers. Several are already starting to inform clinical practice, whereas others remain under evaluation as potential indicators of disease activity and treatment response. As more biomarkers become available for clinical use, it has become increasingly difficult for clinicians and researchers to keep up-to-date with the most recent discovery and interpretation. In this review, we aim to inform practising neurologists, neuroscientists and other clinicians about recent advances in fluid biomarker technology, with a focus on single molecule arrays (Simoa), chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays (CLEIA), electrochemiluminescence (ECL), proximity extension assays (PEA), and microfluidic technology. We discuss established and emerging fluid biomarkers of peripheral neuropathy, their clinical applications, limitations and potential future developments.

Hybridization chain reaction circuit controller: CRISPR/Cas12a conversion amplifier for miRNA-21 sensitive detection

MicroRNA (miRNA) is crucial to the diagnose of various diseases. However, the accurate detection of miRNA has been challenging due to its short length and low abundance. Here, we designed a hybridization chain reaction (HCR) circuit controller to initiate the CRISPR/Cas12a conversion amplifier (HCR-Cas12a controller) for sensitive detection of miRNA-21 (miR-21). In the HCR, pre-crRNA was encapsulated in a hairpin structure until the miR-21 was present. Afterward, Cas12a fully exerted its RNase activity to self-mature pre-crRNA. Then, the trans-cleavage activity of Cas12a was initiated by activator. This results in the conversion of biological signals to fluorescent signal. During HCR-Cas12a controller, the circuit formed quickly, while the Cas12a system worked in a short time. The miR-21 was ultra-sensitively detected with the wide detection range of 1 fM - 100 nM, and the calculated limit of detection was 75.4 aM. The sensitivity was an order of magnitude lower than the standard method. The formation of HCR at room temperature does not require a thermal cycler. Additionally, Cas12a can work without the need for precise or expensive instruments. Therefore, our proposed method was suitable for low-resource settings, and provided a technical basis for sensitive detection of miRNA in low concentration range.

Genetic analysis and natural history of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease CMTX1 due to GJB1 variants

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) due to GJB1 variants (CMTX1) is the second most common form of CMT. It is an X-linked disorder characterized by progressive sensory and motor neuropathy with males affected more severely than females. Many reported GJB1 variants remain classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). In this large, international, multicentre study we prospectively collected demographic, clinical and genetic data on patients with CMT associated with GJB1 variants. Pathogenicity for each variant was defined using adapted American College of Medical Genetics criteria. Baseline and longitudinal analyses were conducted to study genotype-phenotype correlations, to calculate longitudinal change using the CMT Examination Score (CMTES), to compare males versus females, and pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants versus VUS. We present 387 patients from 295 families harbouring 154 variants in GJB1. Of these, 319 patients (82.4%) were deemed to have P/LP variants, 65 had VUS (16.8%) and three benign variants (0.8%; excluded from analysis); an increased proportion of patients with P/LP variants compared with using ClinVar's classification (74.6%). Male patients (166/319, 52.0%, P/LP only) were more severely affected at baseline. Baseline measures in patients with P/LP variants and VUS showed no significant differences, and regression analysis suggested the disease groups were near identical at baseline. Genotype-phenotype analysis suggested c.-17G>A produces the most severe phenotype of the five most common variants, and missense variants in the intracellular domain are less severe than other domains. Progression of disease was seen with increasing CMTES over time up to 8 years follow-up. Standard response mean (SRM), a measure of outcome responsiveness, peaked at 3 years with moderate responsiveness [change in CMTES (ΔCMTES) = 1.3 ± 2.6, P = 0.00016, SRM = 0.50]. Males and females progressed similarly up to 8 years, but baseline regression analysis suggested that over a longer period, females progress more slowly. Progression was most pronounced for mild phenotypes (CMTES = 0-7; 3-year ΔCMTES = 2.3 ± 2.5, P = 0.001, SRM = 0.90). Enhanced variant interpretation has yielded an increased proportion of GJB1 variants classified as P/LP and will aid future variant interpretation in this gene. Baseline and longitudinal analysis of this large cohort of CMTX1 patients describes the natural history of the disease including the rate of progression; CMTES showed moderate responsiveness for the whole group at 3 years and higher responsiveness for the mild group at 3, 4 and 5 years. These results have implications for patient selection for upcoming clinical trials.

Rare PMP22 variants in mild to severe neuropathy uncorrelated to plasma GDF15 or neurofilament light

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is a heterogeneous set of hereditary neuropathies whose genetic causes are not fully understood. Here, we characterize three previously unknown variants in PMP22 and assess their effect on the recently described potential CMT biomarkers' growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and neurofilament light (NFL): first, a heterozygous PMP22 c.178G > A (p.Glu60Lys) in one mother-son pair with adult-onset mild axonal neuropathy. The variant led to abnormal splicing, confirmed in fibroblasts by reverse transcription PCR. Second, a de novo PMP22 c.35A > C (p.His12Pro), and third, a heterozygous 3.2 kb deletion predicting loss of exon 4. The latter two had severe CMT and ultrasonography showing strong nerve enlargement similar to a previous case of exon 4 loss due to a larger deletion. We further studied patients with PMP22 duplication (CMT1A) finding slightly elevated plasma NFL, as measured by the single molecule array immunoassay (SIMOA). In addition, plasma GDF15, as measured by ELISA, correlated with symptom severity for CMT1A. However, in the severely affected individuals with PMP22 exon 4 deletion or p.His12Pro, these biomarkers were within the range of variability of CMT1A and controls, although they had more pronounced nerve hypertrophy. This study adds p.His12Pro and confirms PMP22 exon 4 deletion as causes of severe CMT, whereas the previously unknown splice variant p.Glu60Lys leads to mild axonal neuropathy. Our results suggest that GDF15 and NFL do not distinguish CMT1A from advanced hypertrophic neuropathy caused by rare PMP22 variants.

CMT1A current gene therapy approaches and promising biomarkers

Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathies (CMT) constitute a group of common but highly heterogeneous, non-syndromic genetic disorders affecting predominantly the peripheral nervous system. CMT type 1A (CMT1A) is the most frequent type and accounts for almost ~50% of all diagnosed CMT cases. CMT1A results from the duplication of the peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22) gene. Overexpression of PMP22 protein overloads the protein folding apparatus in Schwann cells and activates the unfolded protein response. This leads to Schwann cell apoptosis, dys- and de- myelination and secondary axonal degeneration, ultimately causing neurological disabilities. During the last decades, several different gene therapies have been developed to treat CMT1A. Almost all of them remain at the pre-clinical stage using CMT1A animal models overexpressing PMP22. The therapeutic goal is to achieve gene silencing, directly or indirectly, thereby reversing the CMT1A genetic mechanism allowing the recovery of myelination and prevention of axonal loss. As promising treatments are rapidly emerging, treatment-responsive and clinically relevant biomarkers are becoming necessary. These biomarkers and sensitive clinical evaluation tools will facilitate the design and successful completion of future clinical trials for CMT1A.

Trials for Slowly Progressive Neurogenetic Diseases Need Surrogate Endpoints

Heritable neurological disorders provide insights into disease mechanisms that permit development of novel therapeutic approaches including antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference, and gene replacement. Many neurogenetic diseases are rare and slowly progressive making it challenging to measure disease progression within short time frames. We share our experience developing clinical outcome assessments and disease biomarkers in the inherited peripheral neuropathies. We posit that carefully developed biomarkers from imaging, plasma, or skin can predict meaningful progression in functional and patient reported outcome assessments such that clinical trials of less than 2 years will be feasible for these rare and ultra-rare disorders. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:906-910.

Types and Concentrations of Blood-Based Biomarkers in Adults With Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Peripheral neuropathies are common conditions and can result in numbness, paresthesia, motor deficits, and pain. There is increasing evidence for the use of biomarkers as clinical indicators of the presence, severity, and prognosis of nerve lesions; however, biomarker identification has largely been focused on disorders of the central nervous system, and less is known about their role in the peripheral nervous system.

Objective

To assess blood-based biomarker concentrations associated with nerve involvement in patients with peripheral neuropathy compared with control participants.

Data Sources

Ovid, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched from inception to September 23, 2021.

Study Selection

Observational studies reporting on blood biomarkers in patients diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy were included. This review was preregistered on PROSPERO and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data were abstracted by 1 investigator and independently reviewed by a second.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were meta-analyzed when at least 2 studies reported the same biomarker with comparable methodology. Fixed-effects models were used when only 2 studies were included; random-effects models were used when more than 2 studies were included.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcome of interest was concentration of biomarkers.

Results

This review included 36 studies reporting on 4414 participants, including 2113 control participants and 2301 patients with peripheral neuropathy with 13 distinct peripheral neuropathy diagnoses. Diabetic neuropathy was the most common neuropathy diagnosis (13 studies), followed by Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (6 studies) and Guillain-Barre syndrome (6 studies). Overall, 16 different blood-based biomarkers associated with nerve involvement were evaluated. The most used were neurofilament light chain, S100B, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and neuron-specific enolase. Patients with peripheral neuropathy demonstrated significantly higher levels of neurofilament light chain compared with controls (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.05]; P < .001). There were no significant differences in levels of S100B (SMD, 1.10 [95% CI, -3.08 to 5.28]; P = .38), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (SMD, -0.52 [95% CI, -2.23 to 1.19]; P = .40), or neuron-specific enolase (SMD, -0.00 [95% CI, -1.99 to 1.98]; P = .10) in patients with peripheral neuropathy compared with control participants.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the use of neurofilament light chain as a blood-based measure associated with the presence of neuronal injury in patients with peripheral neuropathy.

NCAM1 and GDF15 are biomarkers of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in patients and mice

Molecular markers scalable for clinical use are critical for the development of effective treatments and the design of clinical trials. Here, we identify proteins in sera of patients and mouse models with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) with characteristics that make them suitable as biomarkers in clinical practice and therapeutic trials. We collected serum from mouse models of CMT1A (C61 het), CMT2D (GarsC201R, GarsP278KY), CMT1X (Gjb1-null), CMT2L (Hspb8K141N) and from CMT patients with genotypes including CMT1A (PMP22d), CMT2D (GARS), CMT2N (AARS) and other rare genetic forms of CMT. The severity of neuropathy in the patients was assessed by the CMT Neuropathy Examination Score (CMTES). We performed multitargeted proteomics on both sample sets to identify proteins elevated across multiple mouse models and CMT patients. Selected proteins and additional potential biomarkers, such as growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and cell free mitochondrial DNA, were validated by ELISA and quantitative PCR, respectively. We propose that neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (NCAM1) is a candidate biomarker for CMT, as it was elevated in Gjb1-null, Hspb8K141N, GarsC201R and GarsP278KY mice as well as in patients with both demyelinating (CMT1A) and axonal (CMT2D, CMT2N) forms of CMT. We show that NCAM1 may reflect disease severity, demonstrated by a progressive increase in mouse models with time and a significant positive correlation with CMTES neuropathy severity in patients. The increase in NCAM1 may reflect muscle regeneration triggered by denervation, which could potentially track disease progression or the effect of treatments. We found that member proteins of the complement system were elevated in Gjb1-null and Hspb8K141N mouse models as well as in patients with both demyelinating and axonal CMT, indicating possible complement activation at the impaired nerve terminals. However, complement proteins did not correlate with the severity of neuropathy measured on the CMTES scale. Although the complement system does not seem to be a prognostic biomarker, we do show complement elevation to be a common disease feature of CMT, which may be of interest as a therapeutic target. We also identify serum GDF15 as a highly sensitive diagnostic biomarker, which was elevated in all CMT genotypes as well as in Hspb8K141N, Gjb1-null, GarsC201R and GarsP278KY mouse models. Although we cannot fully explain its origin, it may reflect increased stress response or metabolic disturbances in CMT. Further large and longitudinal patient studies should be performed to establish the value of these proteins as diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers for CMT.

Blood biomarkers of peripheral neuropathy

Traditionally, neurophysiology is the primary diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in peripheral neuropathy clinical practice; however, it may lack responsiveness in the context of slowly progressive neuropathies and where there is significant axonal damage. The development of ultrasensitive platforms for measuring serum proteins at the lower limit of detection of traditional ELISA techniques has transformed the field of blood biomarkers of peripheral neuropathy. A variety of blood biomarkers have been identified from inflammatory cytokines and apokines in diabetic neuropathy through to neuron-specific proteins such as neurofilament light chain, Schwann cell-specific proteins such as TMPRSS5 and microRNAs in other acquired and hereditary neuropathies. In this article, we review blood biomarkers of disease activity for the common subtypes of peripheral neuropathy including inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies, vasculitic neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related disorders including TTR amyloidosis.

Fluid Biomarkers for Monitoring Structural Changes in Polyneuropathies: Their Use in Clinical Practice and Trials

Reliable and responsive tools for monitoring disease activity and treatment outcomes in patients with neuropathies are lacking. With the emergence of ultrasensitive blood bioassays, proteins released with nerve damage are potentially useful response biomarkers for many neurological disorders, including polyneuropathies. In this review, we provide an overview of the existing literature focusing on potential applications in polyneuropathy clinical care and trials. Whilst several promising candidates have been identified, no studies have investigated if any of these proteins can serve as response biomarkers of longitudinal disease activity, except for neurofilament light (NfL). For NfL, limited evidence exists supporting a role as a response biomarker in Guillain-Barré syndrome, vasculitic neuropathy, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Most evidence exists for NfL as a response biomarker in hereditary transthyretin-related amyloidosis (hATTR). At the present time, the role of NfL is therefore limited to a supporting clinical tool or exploratory endpoint in trials. Future developments will need to focus on the discovery of additional biomarkers for anatomically specific and other forms of nerve damage using high-throughput technologies and highly sensitive analytical platforms in adequality powered studies of appropriate design. For NfL, a better understanding of cut-off values, the relation to clinical symptoms and long-term disability as well as dynamics in serum on and off treatment is needed to further expand and proceed towards implementation.

Circulating Biomarkers in Neuromuscular Disorders: What Is Known, What Is New

The urgent need for new therapies for some devastating neuromuscular diseases (NMDs), such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, has led to an intense search for new potential biomarkers. Biomarkers can be classified based on their clinical value into different categories: diagnostic biomarkers confirm the presence of a specific disease, prognostic biomarkers provide information about disease course, and therapeutic biomarkers are designed to predict or measure treatment response. Circulating biomarkers, as opposed to instrumental/invasive ones (e.g., muscle MRI or nerve ultrasound, muscle or nerve biopsy), are generally easier to access and less “time-consuming”. In addition to well-known creatine kinase, other promising molecules seem to be candidate biomarkers to improve the diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of therapeutic response, such as antibodies, neurofilaments, and microRNAs. However, there are some criticalities that can complicate their application: variability during the day, stability, and reliable performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, precision and reproducibility) across laboratories. In the present review, we discuss the application of biochemical biomarkers (both validated and emerging) in the most common NMDs with a focus on their diagnostic, prognostic/predictive and therapeutic application, and finally, we address the critical issues in the introduction of new biomarkers.