Association Between Induced Burst Suppression and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Status Epilepticus: A 9-Year Cohort Study

Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: Therapeutic Options and Prognosis

In patients with status epilepticus (SE), the underlying biologic background represents the main prognostic variable. A swift application of a treatment protocol is recommended, including adequate doses of a benzodiazepine followed by an intravenous anti-seizure medicine. If refractory SE arises, general anesthetics should be used in generalized convulsive and non-convulsive SE in coma, while further non-sedating anti-seizure medications attempts are warranted in patients with focal forms. Ketogenic diet and/or ketamine in patients with super-refractory SE, and immunologic treatments for those with new-onset refractory SE/febrile-induced refractory epilepsy syndrome should be considered early. Pharmacologic treatment of SE after cardiac arrest should be oriented by the results of multimodal prognostication.

Diagnosis and management of status epilepticus: improving the status quo

Status epilepticus is a common neurological emergency that is characterised by prolonged or recurrent seizures without recovery between episodes and associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Prompt recognition and targeted therapy can reduce the risk of complications and death associated with status epilepticus, thereby improving outcomes. The most recent International League Against Epilepsy definition considers two important timepoints in status epilepticus: first, when the seizure does not self-terminate; and second, when the seizure can have long-term consequences, including neuronal injury. Recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of status epilepticus indicate that changes in neurotransmission as status epilepticus progresses can increase excitatory seizure-facilitating and decrease inhibitory seizure-terminating mechanisms at a cellular level. Effective clinical management requires rapid initiation of supportive measures, assessment of the cause of the seizure, and first-line treatment with benzodiazepines. If status epilepticus continues, management should entail second-line and third-line treatment agents, supportive EEG monitoring, and admission to an intensive care unit. Future research to study early seizure detection, rescue protocols and medications, rapid treatment escalation, and integration of fundamental scientific and clinical evidence into clinical practice could shorten seizure duration and reduce associated complications. Furthermore, improved recognition, education, and treatment in patients who are at risk might help to prevent status epilepticus, particularly for patients living in low-income and middle-income countries.

Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury

Electroencephalography (EEG) is invaluable in the management of acute neurological emergencies. Characteristic EEG changes have been identified in diverse neurologic conditions including stroke, trauma, and anoxia, and the increased utilization of continuous EEG (cEEG) has identified potentially harmful activity even in patients without overt clinical signs or neurologic diagnoses. Manual annotation by expert neurophysiologists is a major resource limitation in investigating the prognostic and therapeutic implications of these EEG patterns and in expanding EEG use to a broader set of patients who are likely to benefit. Artificial intelligence (AI) has already demonstrated clinical success in guiding cEEG allocation for patients at risk for seizures, and its potential uses in neurocritical care are expanding alongside improvements in AI itself. We review both current clinical uses of AI for EEG-guided management as well as ongoing research directions in automated seizure and ischemia detection, neurologic prognostication, and guidance of medical and surgical treatment.

Hypoalbuminemia in status epilepticus is a biomarker of short- and long-term mortality: A 9-year cohort study

BACKGROUND

Outcome prediction in Status epilepticus (SE) aids in clinical decision-making, yet existing scores have limitations due to SE heterogeneity. Serum albumin is emerging as a readily available prognostic biomarker in various clinical conditions. This study evaluates hypoalbuminemia in predicting short- and long-term mortality.

METHODS

Observational cohort study including non-hypoxic SE adult patients admitted to the University Hospital of Geneva (Switzerland) between 2015 and 2023. Primary outcomes were in-hospital and 6-month mortality.

RESULTS

Four hundred and ninety-six patients were included, 46 (9.3%) died in hospital; 6-month outcome was available for 364 patients, 86 (23.6%) were not alive at follow-up. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with older age and patients' comorbidities. Binomial regression showed an independent correlation between hypoalbuminemia and short- (p = 0.005, OR = 3.35, 95% CI = 1.43-7.86) and long-term mortality (p = 0.001, OR = 3.59,95% CI = 1.75-7.35). The Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) had an overall AUC of 0.754 (95% CI = 0.656-0.836) for predicting in-hospital mortality and of 0.684 (95% CI = 0.613-0.755) for 6-month mortality. Through an exploratory analysis, we replaced age with hypoalbuminemia in the STESS, creating the Albumin-STESS (A-STESS) score (0-6). The global A-STESS AUC significantly improved for both in-hospital (0.837, 95% CI = 0.760-0.916, p = 0.002) and 6-month (0.739, 95% CI = 0.688-0.826; p = 0.033) mortality prediction. A-STESS-3 cutoff demonstrated a strong sensitivity-specificity balance for both in-hospital (sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.68, accuracy = 0.70) and 6-month (sensitivity = 0.67, specificity = 0.73, accuracy = 0.72) mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypoalbuminemia is an easily measurable biomarker reflecting the overall patient's condition and is independently related to short- and long-term SE mortality. Integrating hypoalbuminemia into the STESS (A-STESS) significantly enhances mortality prediction. Future studies are needed to externally validate the A-STESS and evaluate the benefits of albumin supplementation in SE patient prognosis.

Electroencephalogram monitoring during anesthesia and critical care: a guide for the clinician

Perioperative anesthetic, surgical and critical careinterventions can affect brain physiology and overall brain health. The clinical utility of electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring in anesthesia and intensive care settings is multifaceted, offering critical insights into the level of consciousness and depth of anesthesia, facilitating the titration of anesthetic doses, and enabling the detection of ischemic events and epileptic activity. Additionally, EEG monitoring can aid in predicting perioperative neurocognitive disorders, assessing the impact of systemic insults on cerebral function, and informing neuroprognostication. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamental principles of electroencephalography, including the foundations of processed and quantitative electroencephalography. It further explores the characteristic EEG signatures associated wtih anesthetic drugs, the interpretation of the EEG data during anesthesia, and the broader clinical benefits and applications of EEG monitoring in both anesthetic practice and intensive care environments.

ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study

OBJECTIVES

Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is recommended for status epilepticus (SE) management in ICU but is still underused due to resource limitations and inconclusive evidence regarding its impact on outcome. Furthermore, the term "continuous monitoring" often implies continuous recording with variable intermittent review. The establishment of a dedicated ICU-electroencephalogram unit may fill this gap, allowing cEEG with nearly real-time review and multidisciplinary management collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishing on SE outcome and management.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective before-after study.

SETTING

Neuro-ICU of a Swiss academic tertiary medical care center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients treated for nonhypoxic SE between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Data from all SE patients were assessed, comparing those treated before and after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function, ICU mortality, SE duration, and ICU SE management. Secondary outcomes were SE type and etiology. Two hundred seven SE patients were included, 149 (72%) before and 58 (38%) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishment. ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction was associated with increased detection of nonconvulsive SE ( p = 0.003) and SE due to acute symptomatic etiology ( p = 0.019). Regression analysis considering age, comorbidities, SE etiology, and SE semeiology revealed a higher chance of returning to premorbid neurologic function ( p = 0.002), reduced SE duration ( p = 0.024), and a shift in SE management with increased use of antiseizure medications ( p = 0.007) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating neurology expertise in the ICU setting through the establishment of an ICU-electroencephalogram unit with nearly real-time cEEG review, shortened SE duration, and increased likelihood of returning to premorbid neurologic function, with an increased number of antiseizure medications used. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term prognosis.

Status epilepticus in tuberculous meningitis

OBJECTIVE

There is paucity of information about status epilepticus (SE) in tuberculous meningitis (TBM). In this communication, we report SE semiology, response to antiseizure medication (ASM) and outcome of the TBM patients with SE.

METHODS

The diagnosis of TBM was based on clinical, cerebrospinal fluid and MRI findings. The clinical details, severity of meningitis, and MRI and electroencephalography findings were noted. The type of SE, onset from the meningitis symptoms, number of ASMs required to control SE and outcomes were noted.

RESULTS

During study period from august 2015 to march 2023, 143 TBM patients were admitted and 10 (6.9 %) had SE, whose age ranged between 12 and 45 years. MRI revealed exudates in six, hydrocephalus in three, infarctions in seven and tuberculoma in six patients. Median (interquartile range) duration of SE after meningitis symptoms was 65 (43.7-100.5) days. Three had generalized convulsive SE, three epileptia partialis continua (EPC), three focal convulsive SE with bilateral convulsion, and one had non-convulsive SE. Two (20 %) patients responded to two ASMs, six (60 %) had refractory SE whose seizure continued after benzodiazepine and one ASM, and two (20 %) had super-refractory SE having seizures for ≥ 24 h despite use of intravenous anesthetic agent. Four (40 %) patients died; uncontrolled SE resulted death in one, and the remaining patients died due to primary disease. Only 2 (20 %) patients had good recovery and 4 (40 %) had poor recovery at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Status epilepticus in TBM is uncommon and can be refractory or super-refractory resulting in poor outcome.

The Origin of the Burst-Suppression Paradigm in Treatment of Status Epilepticus

After electroencephalography (EEG) was introduced in hospitals, early literature recognized burst-suppression pattern (BSP) as a distinctive EEG pattern characterized by intermittent high-power oscillations alternating with isoelectric periods in coma and epileptic encephalopathies of childhood or the pattern could be induced by general anesthesia and hypothermia. The term was introduced by Swank and Watson in 1949 but was initially described by Derbyshire et al. in 1936 in their study about the anesthetic effects of tribromoethanol. Once the EEG/BSP pattern emerged in the literature as therapeutic goal in refractory status epilepticus, researchers began exploring whether the depth of EEG suppression correlated with improved seizure control and clinical outcomes. We can conclude that, from a historical perspective, the evidence to suppress the brain to a BSP when treating status epilepticus is inconclusive.

Case report: Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome in a 14-year-old girl with multiple organ failure and lethal outcome

We report a case of an otherwise healthy 14-year-old girl with febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), multiple organ failure (MOF), and ultimately a lethal outcome. This is a rare case of FIRES with MOF and consecutive death. Only a few cases have been described in the literature. The adolescent girl was initially admitted to our pediatric emergency department with a first episode of generalized tonic-clonic seizures after a short history of fever a week before admission. Seizures progressed rapidly into refractory status epilepticus without any evidence of the underlying cause, and treatment subsequently had to be escalated to thiopental anesthesia. Since the initial diagnostics showed no promising leads, the rare syndrome of FIRES was suspected, representing a catastrophic epileptic encephalopathy linked to a prior benign febrile infection. Methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulins, and a ketogenic diet were initiated. Respiratory, circulatory, kidney, and liver failure developed during treatment, requiring increasing intensive care. Multiple attempts to deescalate antiepileptic treatment resulted in recurrent status epilepticus. A cranial MRI on the 10th day of treatment revealed diffuse brain edema and no cerebral perfusion. The patient was declared dead on the 11th day of treatment. FIRES should be taken into account in previously healthy children with a new onset of difficult-to-treat seizures after a short febrile infection when no other cause is apparent. First-line treatment, besides seizure control, is the early initiation of immunomodulatory therapy and the start of a ketogenic diet. As treatment is difficult and MOF may develop, patients should be transferred to a specialized children's hospital providing full intensive care.

Ketamine: Pro or antiepileptic agent? A systematic review

PURPOSE

of Review: This evidence-based systematic review evaluated the safety of ketamine as regard the potential to provoke epilepsy to help better guide anesthesiologists in their practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ketamine, originally developed as a dissociative anesthetic, has gained attention for its potential therapeutic applications in various medical conditions, including epilepsy. Ketamine is generally well-tolerated and widely used in anesthesia, however, conflicting data are confusing the anesthesiologists regarding the potential risk of seizures associated with its use. The literature that claimed the proepileeptic property are inconsistent and the mechanism of action is unclear. Moreover, the case reports had been in same certain contexts, such as procedural sedation where ketamine was used as a single agent. On the other hand, the retrospective data analysis confirmed the positive role ketamine plays as antiepileptic agent.

SUMMARY

Many studies have shown promising results for the use of ketamine as antiepileptic agent. In case of epileptic patients, there is no contraindication for using ketamine, however, combining with benzodiazepine or propofol may enhance the safety.

Association Between Dose Escalation of Anesthetics and Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Status Epilepticus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between dose escalation of continuously administered IV anesthetics and its duration with short-term outcomes in adult patients treated for refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

Clinical and electroencephalographic data of patients with RSE without hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy who were treated with anesthetics at a Swiss academic medical center from 2011 to 2019 were assessed. The frequency of anesthetic dose escalation (i.e., dose increase) and its associations with in-hospital death or return to premorbid neurologic function were primary endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associations with endpoints.

RESULTS

Among 111 patients with RSE, doses of anesthetics were escalated in 57%. Despite patients with dose escalation having a higher morbidity (lower Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score at status epilepticus [SE] onset, more presumably fatal etiologies, longer duration of SE and intensive care, more infections, and arterial hypotension) as compared with patients without, the primary endpoints did not differ between these groups in univariable analyses. Multivariable analyses revealed decreased odds for death with dose escalation (odds ratio 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.86), independent of initial GCS score, presumably fatal etiology, SE severity score, SE duration, and nonconvulsive SE with coma, with similar functional outcome among survivors compared with patients without dose escalation.

DISCUSSION

Our study reveals that anesthetic dose escalation in adult patients with RSE is associated with decreased odds for death without increasing the proportion of surviving patients with worse neurofunctional state than before RSE.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that anesthetic dose escalation decreases the odds of death in patients with RSE.

Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European academy of neurology registry on adult refractory status epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE)

BACKGROUND

Status Epilepticus (SE) is a common neurological emergency associated with a high rate of functional decline and mortality. Large randomized trials have addressed the early phases of treatment for convulsive SE. However, evidence regarding third-line anesthetic treatment and the treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is scarce. One trial addressing management of refractory SE with deep general anesthesia was terminated early due to insufficient recruitment. Multicenter prospective registries, including the Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus (SENSE), have shed some light on these questions, but many answers are still lacking, such as the influence exerted by distinct EEG patterns in NCSE on the outcome. We therefore initiated a new prospective multicenter observational registry to collect clinical and EEG data that combined may further help in clinical decision-making and defining SE.

METHODS

Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European Academy of Neurology Registry on refractory Status Epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE) is a prospective, multicenter registry for patients treated for SE. The primary objectives are to document patient and SE characteristics, treatment modalities, EEG, neuroimaging data, and outcome of consecutive adults admitted for SE treatment in each of the participating centers and to identify factors associated with outcome and refractoriness. To reach sufficient statistical power for multivariate analysis, a cohort size of 3000 patients is targeted.

DISCUSSION

The data collected for the registry will provide both valuable EEG data and information about specific treatment steps in different patient groups with SE. Eventually, the data will support clinical decision-making and may further guide the planning of clinical trials. Finally, it could help to redefine NCSE and its management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT number: NCT05839418.

Status epilepticus in the ICU

Status epilepticus (SE) is a common medical emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management that follows published guidelines is best suited to improve outcomes, with the most severe cases frequently being managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Diagnosis of convulsive SE can be made without electroencephalography (EEG), but EEG is required to reliably diagnose nonconvulsive SE. Rapidly narrowing down underlying causes for SE is crucial, as this may guide additional management steps. Causes may range from underlying epilepsy to acute brain injuries such as trauma, cardiac arrest, stroke, and infections. Initial management consists of rapid administration of benzodiazepines and one of the following non-sedating intravenous antiseizure medications (ASM): (fos-)phenytoin, levetiracetam, or valproate; other ASM are increasingly used, such as lacosamide or brivaracetam. SE that continues despite these medications is called refractory, and most commonly treated with continuous infusions of midazolam or propofol. Alternatives include further non-sedating ASM and non-pharmacologic approaches. SE that reemerges after weaning or continues despite management with propofol or midazolam is labeled super-refractory SE. At this step, management may include non-sedating or sedating compounds including ketamine and barbiturates. Continuous video EEG is necessary for the management of refractory and super-refractory SE, as these are almost always nonconvulsive. If possible, management of the underlying cause of seizures is crucial particularly for patients with autoimmune encephalitis. Short-term mortality ranges from 10 to 15% after SE and is primarily related to increasing age, underlying etiology, and medical comorbidities. Refractoriness of treatment is clearly related to outcome with mortality rising from 10% in responsive cases, to 25% in refractory, and nearly 40% in super-refractory SE.