Diagnostic Performance of Adding the Optic Nerve Region Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography to the Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis

Added value of optic nerve lesions for multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

Optic neuritis is a frequent initial presentation of multiple sclerosis (MS). It has been suggested that optic nerve lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered as an additional lesion location for the demonstration of dissemination in space (DIS) in diagnostic criteria for MS. However, the potential value of optic nerve lesion(s) in MS diagnostic criteria has not yet been sufficiently investigated.

METHODS

We prospectively included 79 patients presenting with the first clinical event suggestive of MS. All patients underwent neurological work-up, visual-evoked potential (VEP) testing, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves (ON). Patients were classified results according to the McDonald 2017 criteria, the MAGNIMS criteria and alternative criteria considering ON imaging findings for both DIS and dissemination in time (DIT).

RESULTS

69 patients (87%) fulfilled DIS according to the MAGNIMS criteria, 67 patients (85%) according to McDonald 2017 and 70 patients (89%) according to the alternative diagnostic criteria. Including contrast enhancing ON lesions as an additional criterion for DIT and disregarding CSF results led to n = 9 (11%) additional patients fulfilling DIT and receiving the diagnosis MS compared to the McDonald 2017 and MAGNIMS criteria. Considering CSF findings in addition to MRI, 68 patients received the diagnosis of MS according to McDonald 2017 compared to 66 patients according to MAGNIMS and 69 patients according to the alternative criteria. Regarding VEP findings as an objective finding of optic nerve involvement, 67 patients had DIS according to MAGNIMS criteria and 71 patients had DIS according to alternative criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic criteria including ON lesion on MRI lead only to a slightly higher sensitivity but lower specificity regarding the diagnosis of MS.

Diagnostic accuracy of inter-eye difference of ganglion cell layer alone in identifying optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

The 2024 McDonald criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS) include optic nerve involvement as a fifth region for establishing dissemination in space. Optic neuritis (ON) can be detected through optical coherence tomography (OCT) using an inter-eye absolute or percentage difference (IEAD, IEPD) in ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of GCIPL IEAD/IEPD with GCL and IPL IEAD/IEPD alone for identifying a history of ON.

METHODS

This cross-sectional retrospective study included people with MS (pwMS) who underwent an OCT scan. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using ROC analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 241 pwMS (mean age 34.7 years [SD 9.7], 70.1% female) were included. Sixty-eight (28.2%) patients had a documented history of unilateral ON. GCL IEAD (AUC 0.79, cut-off ⩾ 0.06 mm3 or ⩾2µm, 58.9% sensitivity, 85.1% specificity) and IEPD (AUC 0.80, cut-off ⩾ 3%, 48.7% sensitivity, 89.8% specificity) demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for unilateral ON, showing non-inferiority to the established GCIPL IEAD/IEPD.

CONCLUSION

GCL IEAD and IEPD provide strong diagnostic accuracy for identifying unilateral ON and can be effectively used as an alternative to GCIPL IEAD/IEPD to facilitate implementation in clinical routine.

Optic Neuritis

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the most common and noteworthy inflammatory and infectious optic neuropathies, with an update on newer syndromes.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

We have entered an era of antibody-assisted definitions of distinct types of optic neuritis, including aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease, with distinct pathophysiologies, prognoses, and management options. It is crucial to distinguish between these entities and other common inflammatory (eg, sarcoid or other granulomatous inflammation) or infectious optic neuropathies as appropriate therapy radically differs. These developments highlight the increasing importance of precision terminology as many of these now distinctly defined syndromes have been previously lumped together as "typical or atypical optic neuritis." An individualized evaluation and treatment approach is required.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Multiple sclerosis-related optic neuritis is the most common form of inflammatory demyelinating optic neuritis, causing short segments of optic nerve inflammation, with an excellent visual prognosis and tendency to improve with or without high-dose steroids.Aquaporin-4 associated optic neuritis causes longitudinally extensive optic nerve inflammation and has a more guarded prognosis for visual recovery, with poor visual outcomes in untreated patients compared with multiple sclerosis or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease.Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein optic neuritis also causes longitudinally extensive optic nerve inflammation with a predilection for optic disc edema and tends to be very steroid sensitive, but recurrent. Infectious optic neuropathies are important to recognize; syphilis incidence has doubled in the last decade and requires early aggressive therapy to maximize visual recovery.

Practical issues concerning the use of optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis in Latin America: Discussion from 19 centres on behalf of the Foro Latam EM study group

The 2024 McDonald Criteria now include the optic nerve as the fifth topography for dissemination in space. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a valuable biomarker for the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis (MS). A panel of MS neurologists from 19 centres across 9 Latin American (LATAM) countries discussed OCT use, access, standardized protocols and research potential. They found inequities in OCT access between private (80%) and public healthcare (44%). Only 9 centres had standardized protocols, 50% of which followed the OSCAR-IB consensus criteria for retinal OCT quality assessment and 53% had a neuro-ophthalmologist. The panel concluded that OCT should be available in all MS centres and that standardized acquisition and reporting, as well as improved knowledge of OCT use, in clinical practice are necessary. OCT has significant research potential in LATAM that requires further development and implementation.

Evaluating Fundoscopy as a Screening Tool for Optic Nerve Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: An Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Comparative Study

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration, resulting in the disruption of axonal signal conduction. Optic neuritis (ON) occurs in over 70% of MS cases, highlighting the involvement of the optic nerve in the progression of the disease. Optic nerve atrophy secondary to the inflammatory episode can be observed during fundoscopy as pallor in the temporal quadrant or of the entire optic disc. Our study aims to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of fundus ophthalmoscopy when compared with the temporal thickness of the pRNFL (peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer) measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: We analyzed 88 eyes from 44 relapsing remitting MS patients using fundus photography (FP) and OCT optic disc measurements, correlating the temporal pallor of the optic disc seen in fundus photographs (FPs) with structural parameters obtained using OCT. Results: Our analysis revealed the significant capacity of optic disc pallor grading using FPs in MS patients in order to discriminate between normal and quadrants with pallor (p = 0.006) or strong pallor (p = 0.003) and between ones with light pallor and moderate pallor (p = 0.002) or strong pallor (p = 0.001), while being unable to clearly differentiate between normal quadrants and ones with light pallor (p = 0.608) or between pallor and strong pallor (p = 0.33). Conclusions: Fundoscopy and FP are useful screening tools in evaluating optic nerve atrophy in MS patients that could be used to assess neurodegeneration because of their universal availability. With the proposed inclusion of the optic disc as the fifth part of the CNS, the optic nerve will benefit from multiple exploratory techniques in order to increase the understanding of disease progression and patient quality of life.

Optical coherence tomography and angiography in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anterior visual pathway involvement is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) can be utilized to examine the integrity of the ganglion cell axons (peri-papillary retinal nerve fiber layer; pRNFL) and cell bodies (ganglion cell & inner plexiform layer; GCIPL). OCT angiography (OCTA) can be used to investigate the retinal microvasculature. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we synthesized OCT and OCTA findings in MS.

METHODS

We identified studies that performed OCT and OCTA in people with MS and included data permitting at least one of the following comparisons: 1) MS optic neuritis (MS-ON) vs healthy-control (HC) eyes; 2) MS non-ON (MS-NON) vs HC eyes; and 3) MS-ON vs MS-NON eyes.

RESULTS

The OCT meta-analysis included 170 studies and 8542 HC, 5529 MS-ON, and 14,822 MS-NON eyes. MS-ON and MS-NON eyes had lower pRNFL and GCIPL thickness compared to HC. There was no difference in inner nuclear layer (INL) thickness between HC and MS; INL was thicker in MS-ON compared to MS-NON eyes. The OCTA meta-analysis included 24 studies and 1344 HC, 505 MS-ON, and 1168 MS-NON eyes. MS-ON and MS-NON eyes had lower peripapillary vessel density and macular superficial vessel density compared to HC. We also summarized 12 studies evaluating the diagnostic yield of inter-eye differences in OCT measurements for detecting unilateral optic nerve involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT allows for reliable quantification of retinal neuro-axonal damage in MS. In our review, we highlight studies demonstrating that OCT can establish robust thresholds for detecting unilateral optic nerve involvement.

New Method of Early RRMS Diagnosis Using OCT-Assessed Structural Retinal Data and Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to provide the development of a method to classify optical coherence tomography (OCT)-assessed retinal data in the context of automatic diagnosis of early-stage multiple sclerosis (MS) with decision explanation.

Methods

The database used contains recordings from 79 patients with recently diagnosed relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and no history of optic neuritis and from 69 age-matched healthy control subjects. Analysis was performed on the thicknesses (average right and left eye value and inter-eye difference) of the macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), macular ganglion cell layer (mGCL), macular inner plexiform layer (mIPL), and macular inner retinal complex layer (mIRL), dividing the macular area into six analysis zones. Recursive feature extraction (RFE) and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) are combined to rank relevant features and select the subset that maximizes classifier (support vector machine [SVM]) performance.

Results

Of the initial 48 features, 20 were identified as maximizing classifier accuracy (n = 0.9257). The SHAP values indicate that average thickness has greater relevance than inter-eye difference, that the mGCL and mRNFL are the most influential structures, and that the peripheral papillomacular bundle and the supero-temporal quadrant are the zones most affected.

Conclusions

This approach improves the success rate of automatic diagnosis of early-stage RRMS and enhances clinical decision making transparency.

Translational Relevance

Retinal structure assessment using OCT data could constitute a noninvasive means of diagnosing early-stage MS. This new high-accuracy and high-explainability method of analysis can be implemented in most hospitals and healthcare centers.

The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in patients with optic neuritis

BACKGROUND

Although optic neuritis (ON) is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), lesions of the optic nerve are not included as an anatomical substrate for dissemination in space and time (DIS and DIT).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the increase in sensitivity of including MRI lesions of the optic nerve for the diagnosis of MS in patients with ON.

METHODS

We included patients consecutively referred with first time, monosymptomatic ON, with no known cause of the ON, who underwent orbital MRI including fat suppressed T2 and T1-sequences with and without gadolinium contrast.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty patients were included. Optic nerve T2 lesions and/or T1-contrast enhancement was shown in 104 patients. Sixty-three patients were diagnosed with MS at baseline. Nine patients developed MS during follow-up. The inclusion of optic nerve MRI lesions led to the diagnosis of 8 additional patients and increased sensitivity to 0.99 (95% CI 0.96-1.00) compared to 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.95) for 2017 criteria, while decreasing the specificity to 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.92) compared to 1.00.

CONCLUSION

Amending the diagnostic criteria for MS to include MRI lesions of the optic nerve as a substrate for DIS and DIT may increase sensitivity and lead to more rapid diagnosis of MS.

Low-Field (64 mT) Portable MRI for Rapid Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Dissemination in Space in Patients Presenting with Optic Neuritis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Low-field 64 mT portable brain MRI has recently shown diagnostic promise for MS. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of portable MRI (pMRI) in assessing dissemination in space (DIS) in patients presenting with optic neuritis and determine whether deploying pMRI in the MS clinic can shorten the time from symptom onset to MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients with optic neuritis referred to a tertiary academic MS center from July 2022 to January 2024 underwent both point-of-care pMRI and subsequent 3T conventional MRI (cMRI). Images were evaluated for periventricular (PV), juxtacortical (JC), and infratentorial (IT) lesions. DIS was determined on brain MRI per 2017 McDonald criteria. Test characteristics were computed by using cMRI as the reference. Interrater and intermodality agreement between pMRI and cMRI were evaluated by using the Cohen κ. Time from symptom onset to pMRI and cMRI during the study period was compared with the preceding 1.5 years before pMRI implementation by using Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn tests.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (median age: 32.5 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 28-40]; 80% women) were included, of whom 9 (45%) and 5 (25%) had DIS on cMRI and pMRI, respectively. Median time interval between pMRI and cMRI was 7 days (IQR, 3.5-12.5). Interrater agreement was very good for PV (95%, κ = 0.89), and good for JC and IT lesions (90%, κ = 0.69 for both). Intermodality agreement was good for PV (90%, κ = 0.80) and JC (85%, κ = 0.63), and moderate for IT lesions (75%, κ = 0.42) and DIS (80%, κ = 0.58). pMRI had a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 100% for DIS. The median time from symptom onset to pMRI was significantly shorter (8.5 days [IQR 7-12]) compared with the interval to cMRI before pMRI deployment (21 days [IQR 8-49], n = 50) and after pMRI deployment (15 days [IQR 12-29], n = 30) (both P < .01). Time from symptom onset to cMRI in those periods was not significantly different (P = .29).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with optic neuritis, pMRI exhibited moderate concordance, moderate sensitivity, and high specificity for DIS compared with cMRI. Its integration into the MS clinic reduced the time from symptom onset to MRI. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of pMRI in expediting early MS diagnosis and as an imaging tool in resource-limited settings.

Misdiagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Past, Present, and Future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent worldwide problem. This review discusses how MS misdiagnosis has evolved over time and focuses on contemporary challenges and potential strategies for its prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies report cohorts with a range of misdiagnosis between 5 and 18%. Common disorders are frequently misdiagnosed as MS. Overreliance on MRI findings and misapplication of MS diagnostic criteria are often associated with misdiagnosis. Emerging imaging biomarkers, including the central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesions, may aid diagnostic accuracy when evaluating patients for suspected MS. MS misdiagnosis can have harmful consequences for patients and healthcare systems. Further research is needed to better understand its causes. Concerted and novel educational efforts to ensure accurate and widespread implementation of MS diagnostic criteria remain an unmet need. The incorporation of diagnostic biomarkers highly specific for MS in the future may prevent misdiagnosis.

Recent advances in neuro-ophthalmology

This review article represents a collaborative effort across continents, bringing together the latest developments in neuro-ophthalmology with a focus on innovative diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that are shaping the future of the field. Among the most significant advancements is the rise of optical coherence tomography (OCT), now recognized as an indispensable tool in neuro-ophthalmological research, providing unparalleled insights into optic nerve and central nervous system pathologies. Gene therapy, particularly for conditions such as Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy, marks a new frontier in personalized medicine, offering hope for previously untreatable conditions. The article also examines the transformative role of telemedicine and artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice, which are revolutionizing patient care and enhancing diagnostic precision. Furthermore, it highlights the impact of novel serological biomarkers on the understanding and management of immune-mediated optic neuritis, and discusses the introduction of new therapeutic agents like Tocilizumab and Teprotumumab, which are redefining treatment paradigms. Collectively, these advancements reflect the profound influence of modern medicine on neuro-ophthalmology, paving the way for improved patient outcomes and fostering new avenues for research and clinical practice.

Improving criteria for dissemination in space in multiple sclerosis by including additional regions

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effects of adding regions to current dissemination in space (DIS) criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Participants underwent brain, optic nerve, and spinal cord MRI. Baseline DIS was assessed by 2017 McDonald criteria and versions including optic nerve, temporal lobe, or corpus callosum as a fifth region (requiring 2/5), a version with all regions (requiring 3/7) and optic nerve variations requiring 3/5 and 4/5 regions. Performance was evaluated against MS diagnosis (2017 McDonald criteria) during follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-four participants were recruited (53F, 32.8 ± 7.1 years). 2017 McDonald DIS criteria were 87% sensitive (95% CI: 76-94), 73% specific (50-89), and 83% accurate (74-91) in identifying MS. Modified criteria with optic nerve improved sensitivity to 98% (91-100), with specificity 33% (13-59) and accuracy 84% (74-91). Criteria including temporal lobe showed sensitivity 94% (84-98), specificity 50% (28-72), and accuracy 82% (72-90); criteria including corpus callosum showed sensitivity 90% (80-96), specificity 68% (45-86), and accuracy 85% (75-91). Criteria adding all three regions (3/7 required) had sensitivity 95% (87-99), specificity 55% (32-76), and accuracy 85% (75-91). When requiring 3/5 regions (optic nerve as the fifth), sensitivity was 82% (70-91), specificity 77% (55-92), and accuracy 81% (71-89); with 4/5 regions, sensitivity was 56% (43-69), specificity 95% (77-100), and accuracy 67% (56-77).

INTERPRETATION

Optic nerve inclusion increased sensitivity while lowering specificity. Increasing required regions in optic nerve criteria increased specificity and decreased sensitivity. Results suggest considering the optic nerve for DIS. An option of 3/5 or 4/5 regions preserved specificity, and criteria adding all three regions had highest accuracy.

Research progress of optic nerve imaging during 1991-2023: a bibliometric analysis

Background

Optic nerve imaging is crucial for diagnosing and understanding optic neuropathies because it provides detailed visualization of the nerve's structure and pathologies through advanced modalities. This study conducted a bibliometric analysis within the field of optic nerve imaging, aiming to pinpoint the latest research trends and focal points in optic nerve imaging.

Methods

The core literature on optic nerve imaging published between January 1991 and August 2023 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. The analysis and visualization of scientific productivity and emerging trends were facilitated through the utilization of Bibliometrix software, CiteSpace, Gephi, VOSviewer, R software, and Python.

Results

In total, 15,247 publications on optic nerve imaging were included in the analysis. Notably, the top 3 journals contributing to this field were Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmology, and the British Journal of Ophthalmology. This research on optic nerve imaging extended across 97 countries, with the USA leading in research endeavors. Noteworthy burst term analysis revealed that "Segmentation" and "Machine learning" are gaining attention. Additionally, the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model indicated that image processing has been a hotspot in recent years.

Conclusions

This study revealed the research trends, hotspots, and emerging topics in optic nerve imaging through bibliometric analysis and network visualization. At present, the research focus is directed towards employing artificial intelligence for image post-processing. The findings of this study offer valuable insights into future research direction and clinical applications.

Current and future role of MRI in the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple sclerosis

In the majority of cases, multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by reversible episodes of neurological dysfunction, often followed by irreversible clinical disability. Accurate diagnostic criteria and prognostic markers are critical to enable early diagnosis and correctly identify patients with MS at increased risk of disease progression. The 2017 McDonald diagnostic criteria, which include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a fundamental paraclinical tool, show high sensitivity and accuracy for the diagnosis of MS allowing early diagnosis and treatment. However, their inappropriate application, especially in the context of atypical clinical presentations, may increase the risk of misdiagnosis. To further improve the diagnostic process, novel imaging markers are emerging, but rigorous validation and standardization is still needed before they can be incorporated into clinical practice. This Series article discusses the current role of MRI in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS, while examining promising MRI markers, which could serve as reliable predictors of subsequent disease progression, helping to optimize the management of individual patients with MS. We also explore the potential of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence and automated quantification tools, to support clinicians in the management of patients. Yet, to ensure consistency and improvement in the use of MRI in MS diagnosis and patient follow-up, it is essential that standardized brain and spinal cord MRI protocols are applied, and that interpretation of results is performed by qualified (neuro)radiologists in all countries.

Routine MR Imaging Protocol and Standardization in Central Nervous System Demyelinating Diseases

Standardized MR imaging protocols are important for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and the appropriate use of MR imaging in routine clinical practice. Advances in using MR imaging to establish an earlier diagnosis of MS, safety concerns regarding intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents, and the value of spinal cord MR imaging for diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring purposes suggest a changing role of MR imaging for the management and care of MS patients. The MR imaging protocol emphasizes 3 dimensional acquisitions for optimal comparison over time.

Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, and Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G-associated Disease

The diagnostic workup of multiple sclerosis (MS) has evolved considerably. The 2017 revision of the McDonald criteria shows high sensitivity and accuracy in predicting clinically definite MS in patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and allows an earlier MS diagnosis. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G-associated disease (MOGAD) are recognized as separate conditions from MS, with specific diagnostic criteria. New MR imaging markers may improve diagnostic specificity for these conditions, thus reducing the risk of misdiagnosis. This study summarizes the most recent updates regarding the application of MR imaging for the diagnosis of MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD.

Optic Nerve Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

Optic neuritis is a common feature in multiple sclerosis and in 2 other autoimmune demyelinating disorders such as aquaporin-4 IgG antibody-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Although serologic testing is critical for differentiating these different autoimmune-mediated disorders, MR imaging, which is the preferred imaging modality for assessing the optic nerve, can provide valuable information, suggesting a specific diagnosis and guiding the appropriate serologic testing.

Applying the 2022 optic neuritis criteria to noninflammatory optic neuropathies with optic nerve T2-hyperintensity: an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Recent diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis include T2-hyperintensity of the optic nerve (ON), even without associated contrast enhancement. However, isolated ON-T2-hyperintensity is a nonspecific finding found in any optic neuropathy or severe retinopathy. We applied the 2022 optic neuritis diagnostic criteria to a cohort of patients with noninflammatory optic neuropathy and ON-T2-hyperintensity in at least one eye, to assess the rate of optic neuritis misdiagnosis using these criteria.

METHODS

Retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent brain/orbit MRI with/without contrast between 07/01/2019 and 06/30/2022. Patients with ON-T2-hyperintensity in at least one eye were included. The 2022 optic neuritis diagnostic criteria were applied to patients with noninflammatory optic neuropathies who had an ophthalmologic examination available for review.

RESULTS

Of 150 patients included, 85/150 had compressive optic neuropathy; 32/150 had glaucoma; 12/150 had papilledema; 8/150 had hereditary (3), radiation-induced (3), nutritional (1), traumatic (1) optic neuropathies (none fulfilled the criteria); 13/150 had ischemic optic neuropathy and 4 fulfilled the criteria as definite optic neuritis due to contrast enhancement of the ON head. Seven additional patients would have satisfied the diagnostic criteria if red flags for alternative diagnoses had been overlooked.

DISCUSSION

The application of the 2022 optic neuritis diagnostic criteria in patients with noninflammatory optic neuropathy and ON-T2-hyperintensity in at least one ON resulted in misdiagnosis of optic neuritis in only 4 patients because of ON head enhancement, all with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation and exclusion of the ON head as a location in the MRI criteria would have prevented optic neuritis misdiagnosis in our study.

Applying a genetic risk score model to enhance prediction of future multiple sclerosis diagnosis at first presentation with optic neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON) is associated with numerous immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, but 50% patients are ultimately diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). Differentiating MS-ON from non-MS-ON acutely is challenging but important; non-MS ON often requires urgent immunosuppression to preserve vision. Using data from the United Kingdom Biobank we showed that combining an MS-genetic risk score (GRS) with demographic risk factors (age, sex) significantly improved MS prediction in undifferentiated ON; one standard deviation of MS-GRS increased the Hazard of MS 1.3-fold (95% confidence interval 1.07-1.55, P < 0.01). Participants stratified into quartiles of predicted risk developed incident MS at rates varying from 4% (95%CI 0.5-7%, lowest risk quartile) to 41% (95%CI 33-49%, highest risk quartile). The model replicated across two cohorts (Geisinger, USA, and FinnGen, Finland). This study indicates that a combined model might enhance individual MS risk stratification, paving the way for precision-based ON treatment and earlier MS disease-modifying therapy.

Optic nerve topography in multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: Existing knowledge and future directions

Current diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) do not consider the optic nerve as a typical topography for establishing the diagnosis. Recent studies have proved the utility of optic nerve magnetic resonance imaging, optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in detecting optic nerve lesions during the early stages of MS. In addition, emerging evidence supports the inclusion of optic nerve topography as a fifth region to fulfil the dissemination in space criteria. Anticipating a modification in the McDonald criteria, it is crucial for neurologists to familiarize with the diagnostic properties of each test in detecting optic nerve lesions and understand how to incorporate them into the MS diagnostic process. Therefore, the objective of this article is to review the existing evidence supporting the use of these tests in the diagnostic process of MS and provide a practical algorithm that can serve as a valuable guide for clinical practice.

Assignment Completed: The Optic Nerve Should Graduate to Be the Fifth Lesion Site for the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis

Optic neuritis has long been considered a characteristic finding of multiple sclerosis and the initial manifestation of the disorder in about 25% of patients. Approximately 70% of patients will experience optic nerve dysfunction during their disease course.1.

The OSCAR-MP Consensus Criteria for Quality Assessment of Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a noninvasive high-resolution imaging technique for assessing the retinal vasculature and is increasingly used in various ophthalmologic, neuro-ophthalmologic, and neurologic diseases. To date, there are no validated consensus criteria for quality control (QC) of OCTA. Our study aimed to develop criteria for OCTA quality assessment.

METHODS

To establish criteria through (1) extensive literature review on OCTA artifacts and image quality to generate standardized and easy-to-apply OCTA QC criteria, (2) application of OCTA QC criteria to evaluate interrater agreement, (3) identification of reasons for interrater disagreement, revision of OCTA QC criteria, development of OCTA QC scoring guide and training set, and (4) validation of QC criteria in an international, interdisciplinary multicenter study.

RESULTS

We identified 7 major aspects that affect OCTA quality: (O) obvious problems, (S) signal strength, (C) centration, (A) algorithm failure, (R) retinal pathology, (M) motion artifacts, and (P) projection artifacts. Seven independent raters applied the OSCAR-MP criteria to a set of 40 OCTA scans from people with MS, Sjogren syndrome, and uveitis and healthy individuals. The interrater kappa was substantial (κ 0.67). Projection artifacts were the main reason for interrater disagreement. Because artifacts can affect only parts of OCTA images, we agreed that prior definition of a specific region of interest (ROI) is crucial for subsequent OCTA quality assessment. To enhance artifact recognition and interrater agreement on reduced image quality, we designed a scoring guide and OCTA training set. Using these educational tools, 23 raters from 14 different centers reached an almost perfect agreement (κ 0.92) for the rejection of poor-quality OCTA images using the OSCAR-MP criteria.

DISCUSSION

We propose a 3-step approach for standardized quality control: (1) To define a specific ROI, (2) to assess the occurrence of OCTA artifacts according to the OSCAR-MP criteria, and (3) to evaluate OCTA quality based on the occurrence of different artifacts within the ROI. OSCAR-MP OCTA QC criteria achieved high interrater agreement in an international multicenter study and is a promising QC protocol for application in the context of future clinical trials and studies.