Intravenous phenytoin in acute treatment of seizures

Treatment of Refractory and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus

Refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus (SE) are serious illnesses with a high risk of morbidity and even fatality. In the setting of refractory generalized convulsive SE (GCSE), there is ample justification to use continuous infusions of highly sedating medications-usually midazolam, pentobarbital, or propofol. Each of these medications has advantages and disadvantages, and the particulars of their use remain controversial. Continuous EEG monitoring is crucial in guiding the management of these critically ill patients: in diagnosis, in detecting relapse, and in adjusting medications. Forms of SE other than GCSE (and its continuation in a "subtle" or nonconvulsive form) should usually be treated far less aggressively, often with nonsedating anti-seizure drugs (ASDs). Management of "non-classic" NCSE in ICUs is very complicated and controversial, and some cases may require aggressive treatment. One of the largest problems in refractory SE (RSE) treatment is withdrawing coma-inducing drugs, as the prolonged ICU courses they prompt often lead to additional complications. In drug withdrawal after control of convulsive SE, nonsedating ASDs can assist; medical management is crucial; and some brief seizures may have to be tolerated. For the most refractory of cases, immunotherapy, ketamine, ketogenic diet, and focal surgery are among several newer or less standard treatments that can be considered. The morbidity and mortality of RSE is substantial, but many patients survive and even return to normal function, so RSE should be treated promptly and as aggressively as the individual patient and type of SE indicate.

Status Epilepticus and Beyond: A Clinical Review of Status Epilepticus and an Update on Current Management Strategies in Super-refractory Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus and refractory status epilepticus represent some of the most complex conditions encountered in the neurological intensive care unit. Challenges in management are common as treatment options become limited and prolonged hospital courses are accompanied by complications and worsening patient outcomes. Antiepileptic drug treatments have become increasingly complex. Rational polytherapy should consider the pharmacodynamics and kinetics of medications. When seizures cannot be controlled with medical therapy, alternative treatments, including early surgical evaluation can be considered; however, evidence is limited. This review provides a brief overview of status epilepticus, and a recent update on the management of refractory status epilepticus based on evidence from the literature, evidence-based guidelines, and experiences at our institution.

Intravenous and Intramuscular Formulations of Antiseizure Drugs in the Treatment of Epilepsy

Intravenous and intramuscular antiseizure drugs (ASDs) are essential in the treatment of clinical seizure emergencies as well as in replacement therapy when oral administration is not possible. The parenteral formulations provide rapid delivery and complete (intravenous) or nearly complete (intramuscular) bioavailability. Controlled administration of the ASD is feasible with intravenous but not intramuscular formulations. This article reviews the literature and discusses the chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of currently available intravenous and intramuscular ASD formulations as well as the development of new formulations and agents. Intravenous or intramuscular formulations of lorazepam, diazepam, midazolam, and clonazepam are typically used as the initial treatment agents in seizure emergencies. Recent studies also support the use of intramuscular midazolam as easier than the intravenous delivery of lorazepam in the pre-hospital setting. However, benzodiazepines may be associated with hypotension and respiratory depression. Although loading with intravenous phenytoin was an early approach to treatment, it is associated with cardiac arrhythmias, hypotension, and tissue injury at the injection site. This has made it less favored than fosphenytoin, a water-soluble, phosphorylated phenytoin molecule. Other drugs being used for acute seizure emergencies are intravenous formulations of valproic acid, levetiracetam, and lacosamide. However, the comparative effectiveness of these for status epilepticus (SE) has not been evaluated adequately. Consequently, guidelines for the medical management of SE continue to recommend lorazepam followed by fosphenytoin, or phenytoin if fosphenytoin is not available. Intravenous solutions for carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and topiramate have been developed but remain investigational. The current ASDs were not developed for use in emergency situations, but were adapted from ASDs approved for chronic oral use. New approaches for bringing drugs from experimental models to treatment of human SE are needed.

Pharmacotherapy for Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) represents the most severe form of epilepsy. It is one of the most common neurologic emergencies, with an incidence of up to 61 per 100,000 per year and an estimated mortality of 20 %. Clinically, tonic-clonic convulsive SE is divided into four subsequent stages: early, established, refractory, and super-refractory. Pharmacotherapy of status epilepticus, especially of its later stages, represents an "evidence-free zone," due to a lack of high-quality, controlled trials to inform clinical decisions. This comprehensive narrative review focuses on the pharmacotherapy of SE, presented according to the four-staged approach outlined above, and providing pharmacological properties and efficacy/safety data for each antiepileptic drug according to the strength of scientific evidence from the available literature. Data sources included MEDLINE and back-tracking of references in pertinent studies. Intravenous lorazepam or intramuscular midazolam effectively control early SE in approximately 63-73 % of patients. Despite a suboptimal safety profile, intravenous phenytoin or phenobarbital are widely used treatments for established SE; alternatives include valproate, levetiracetam, and lacosamide. Anesthetics are widely used in refractory and super-refractory SE, despite the current lack of trials in this field. Data on alternative treatments in the later stages are limited. Valproate and levetiracetam represent safe and effective alternatives to phenobarbital and phenytoin for treatment of established SE persisting despite first-line treatment with benzodiazepines. To date there are no class I data to support recommendations for most antiepileptic drugs for established, refractory, and super-refractory SE. Limiting the methodologic heterogeneity across studies is required and high-class randomized, controlled trials to inform clinicians about the best treatment in established and refractory status are needed.

Antiepileptic drugs: the old and the new

During the past decade several new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have become available, including new formulations of some of the older medications. Understanding the pharmacokinetics of the new AEDs is important because they are primarily used for adjunctive therapy and interactions with other medications can result in significant toxicities. The new-generation AEDs do not cause serious morbidity in overdose, and treatment is primarily supportive. Specific medications should be chosen based on the patient's history and presentation.

Treatment of status epilepticus in children

Status epilepticus (SE) is a condition characterised by frequent and prolonged epileptic seizures which frequently develop in the immature brain. Fever, metabolic disorders and subtherapeutic concentrations of antiepileptic drugs are the most common factors precipitating SE in children. Progressive neuronal damage occurs if convulsive SE persists for more than 30 minutes, with neurological, epileptic and cognitive sequelae. Unfortunately, the immature brain is more predisposed to SE and its sequelae than the mature brain. SE may be categorised as convulsive, nonconvulsive or neonatal according to its responsiveness to antiepileptic drugs. Regardless of category, the main objective in the treatment of SE is to abort the seizures and treat the inciting condition. Treatment includes: (i) monitoring of hydration, electrolyte balance, and cardiocirculatory and pulmonary functions; and (ii) rapid intravenous administration of specific antiepileptic drugs. Benzodiazepines (usually diazepam, lorazepam or midazolam) are the most effective agents for the initial treatment of convulsive and nonconvulsive SE. In particular, midazolam infusion is an effective and well tolerated therapeutic approach for the management of childhood SE, including refractory SE. Phenytoin remains an excellent agent because of its long duration of action, but it is not active in nonconvulsive SE. Fosphenytoin, a phenytoin prodrug, represents a significant advance in the treatment of children with convulsive SE. Intravenous phenytoin and intramuscular phenobarbital (phenobarbitone) are generally used in neonatal SE; other agents are rarely used.

Treatment of epilepsy in the multiply handicapped

The medical management of epilepsy in the multi-handicapped patient requires careful evaluation, classification, and pharmacologic treatment. It is estimated that 20-40% of patients with mental retardation and cerebral palsy have epilepsy. This review reports the clinical trial data and personal experience related to the use of newer AEDs in the chronic management of epilepsy syndromes in children and adults, as well as information available on the treatment of seizures in individuals with mental retardation and associated handicaps. Furthermore, clusters of seizures, prolonged seizures and status epilepticus are more commonly seen in the multiply handicapped and mentally retarded population and require special attention. The new antiepileptic drugs felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide show specific advantage in some multiply handicapped patients, be it for seizure control or medication tolerance. Furthermore, new modalities of treatment for prolonged seizures allow better efficacy both outside of hospital and within hospital facilities. The treatment of epilepsy in multi-handicapped and retarded adults and children has significantly advanced in the past few years, and much of this improvement can be attributed to improved knowledge and monitoring of new antiepileptic drugs. Conventional anticonvulsants remain first line therapy for most clinicians, but newer AEDs must broaden the therapeutic option and do allow improved therapy for some multiply handicapped patients.

Fosphenytoin and phenytoin in patients with status epilepticus: improved tolerability versus increased costs

Tonic-clonic status epilepticus (TCSE) is the most common neurological emergency and affects approximately 60000 patients each year in the US. The risk of complications increases substantially as TCSE lasts longer than 60 minutes. Ideally, drugs used to treat this condition should be well tolerated when administered as rapid intravenous infusions and should not interfere with patients' state of consciousness or cardiovascular and respiratory functions. Because of its efficacy, absence of sedation or respiratory suppression, intravenous phenytoin has largely replaced phenobarbital (phenobarbitone) as the second agent of choice (following the administration of a benzodiazepine) in the treatment of TCSE. While the efficacy of phenytoin in the treatment of acute seizures and TCSE is well established, the parenteral formulation of phenytoin has several inherent shortcomings which compromise its tolerability and limit the rate of administration. Intravenous phenytoin has been associated with fatal haemodynamic complications and serious reactions at the injection site including skin necrosis and amputation of extremities. Fosphenytoin, a phenytoin prodrug, has the same pharmacological properties as phenytoin but none of the injection site and cardiac rhythm complications of intravenous infusions of phenytoin. While fosphenytoin costs more than intravenous phenytoin, treating the acute and chronic complications of TCSE itself, and the complications of intravenous phenytoin can also be costly. All other factors being equal, there is no doubt that fosphenytoin is better tolerated and can be delivered faster than intravenous phenytoin; 2 measures that clearly improve outcome in patients with TCSE. The tolerability of intramuscular fosphenytoin also extends its use to clinical situations where prompt administration of a nondepressing anticonvulsant is indicated but secure intravenous access and cardiac monitoring are not available, such as treatment of seizures by rescue squads in the field and serial seizures in the institutionalised, elderly and other patients with intractable epilepsy.

A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans Affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Although generalized convulsive status epilepticus is a life-threatening emergency, the best initial drug treatment is uncertain. We conducted a five-year randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of four intravenous regimens: diazepam (0.15 mg per kilogram of body weight) followed by phenytoin (18 mg per kilogram), lorazepam (0.1 mg per kilogram), phenobarbital (15 mg per kilogram), and phenytoin (18 mg per kilogram). Patients were classified as having either overt generalized status epilepticus (defined as easily visible generalized convulsions) or subtle status epilepticus (indicated by coma and ictal discharges on the electroencephalogram, with or without subtle convulsive movements such as rhythmic muscle twitches or tonic eye deviation). Treatment was considered successful when all motor and electroencephalographic seizure activity ceased within 20 minutes after the beginning of the drug infusion and there was no return of seizure activity during the next 40 minutes. Analyses were performed with data on only the 518 patients with verified generalized convulsive status epilepticus as well as with data on all 570 patients who were enrolled.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-four patients had a verified diagnosis of overt generalized convulsive status epilepticus. In this group, lorazepam was successful in 64.9 percent of those assigned to receive it, phenobarbital in 58.2 percent, diazepam plus phenytoin in 55.8 percent, and phenytoin in 43.6 percent (P=0.02 for the overall comparison among the four groups). Lorazepam was significantly superior to phenytoin in a pairwise comparison (P=0.002). Among the 134 patients with a verified diagnosis of subtle generalized convulsive status epilepticus, no significant differences among the treatments were detected (range of success rates, 7.7 to 24.2 percent). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the differences among treatment groups were not significant, either among the patients with overt status epilepticus (P=0.12) or among those with subtle status epilepticus (P=0.91). There were no differences among the treatments with respect to recurrence during the 12-hour study period, the incidence of adverse reactions, or the outcome at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

As initial intravenous treatment for overt generalized convulsive status epilepticus, lorazepam is more effective than phenytoin. Although lorazepam is no more efficacious than phenobarbital or diazepam plus phenytoin, it is easier to use.

Seizures

Seizures are one of the most common neurologic emergencies. This article reviews the emergency evaluation and treatment of seizures, including status epilepticus. Pseudoseizures related to drugs, alcohol, and pregnancy are also discussed.

Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus is a medical emergency that requires prompt intervention with effective anticonvulsant drug therapy to minimize the risk of morbidity and mortality. Although status epilepticus can occur as the first presentation of seizures, it is more common in patients who have a history of epilepsy. Metabolic disturbances, stroke, infection, and head trauma can also precipitate repetitive or continuous seizures and, if possible, the underlying etiology should be corrected as the first step in effective management. Permanent neurological sequelae are more likely as the duration of status epilepticus exceeds 90 minutes. In this regard, it is essential that anticonvulsant drug therapy is initiated as soon as possible. Benzodiazepines (diazepam, Iorazepam) are commonly used as the agents of choice for early termination of status epilepticus. Phenytoin and phenobarbital are also useful because of their long-lasting anticonvulsant effects. Other agents that may be useful under special circumstances include midazolam, fosphenytoin (phenytoin prodrug), sodium valproate, paraldehyde, and high-dose barbiturates.

Status epilepticus related to alcohol abuse

We reviewed the case records of 249 adult patients with generalized convulsive status epilepticus (SE) examined in San Francisco General Hospital between 1977 and 1989 and identified 27 patients (10.8%) in whom alcohol abuse was the only identifiable precipitating cause of SE. In 12 patients (44% of the study group), SE was the first presentation of alcohol-related seizures. Seizures with focal features were observed in 11 patients (40.1%), but there was little correlation with localized computed tomography (CT) or EEG abnormalities. SE was controlled with phenytoin (PHT), with or without a benzodiazepine (BZD), in 18 patients (66.7%). Twenty-two patients (81.5%) were discharged with no new neurologic deficits, but time to recovery of baseline mental status was prolonged (> 12 h) in 24 patients. With regard to alcohol abuse history, study patients did not differ from a comparison group with isolated alcohol withdrawal seizures. The results indicate that alcohol abuse is a common cause of SE and that SE may be the first presentation of alcohol-related seizures. Furthermore, the outcome of patients with alcohol-related SE compares favorably with that of patients with SE due to other causes, but recovery of these patients may be complicated by a prolonged postictal state.

Treatment of status epilepticus

Status epilepticus, particularly the convulsive form, is a medical emergency, warranting prompt and aggressive treatment. To do this, one must have a thorough understanding of the pharmacology of the anticonvulsant agents. Therapy should be directed toward rapid termination of the status epilepticus, prevention of seizure recurrence, and treatment of any underlying cause. Most importantly, one should establish and adhere to a standard treatment protocol for best results.

Status epilepticus in children. The acute management

Status epilepticus is a common pediatric emergency that may result in significant morbidity and mortality. This article provides a clinical update on generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus in children and a practical approach to their initial stabilization and pharmacologic management. Only an organized approach to the initial stabilization and management of the child in status epilepticus will help prevent unnecessary complications and death.

Removal of phenytoin by plasmapheresis in a patient with thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura

Phenytoin removal by plasmapheresis was evaluated in a 17-year-old girl with thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura. Free and total phenytoin concentrations were measured in the patient's serum and in the plasma removed by plasmapheresis. Plasmapheresis was performed on three separate days with the removal of 4.7%, 3.3%, and 2.7% of total body stores. Free phenytoin concentration was similar in both the plasma removed by plasmapheresis and the patient's serum. Plasmapheresis did not significantly alter the serum concentration of phenytoin; dosage adjustments of phenytoin are therefore unnecessary.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants. State of the art

There is considerable interindividual variation in the relationship between control of seizures and the serum anticonvulsant concentration. The minimum effective serum concentration is dependent on the type and severity of the epilepsy, and varies from patient to patient. The therapeutic range should be used as a guide to adjust the dose in order to further improve seizure control or reduce toxicity; the latter is more likely with higher serum concentrations, but can also be present when concentrations are low. A request for the serum concentration of an anticonvulsant should be made only for good clinical reasons, and an interpretation of that concentration can only be made if all the relevant clinical details are available. Indications for the measurement of serum anticonvulsant concentrations include poor seizure control, toxicity, suspected gross noncompliance, status epilepticus and seizure control, toxicity, suspected gross noncompliance, status epilepticus and the elapse of 2 to 4 weeks after the initiation of therapy. Additional drug therapy, pregnancy or illness may alter drug disposition in a well controlled patient and therapeutic drug monitoring may, therefore, help to prevent seizures secondary to these changes. The measurement of anticonvulsants in saliva as opposed to serum may be of benefit in some patients.

Efficacy of ACC-9653 (a phenytoin prodrug) in experimental status epilepticus in the rat

Status epilepticus was induced by injection of homocysteine thiolactone to rats with epileptogenic cortical cobalt lesions. Either standard phenytoin or ACC-9653 (a phenytoin prodrug) was injected after the second generalized tonic-clonic seizure. Rats treated with ACC-9653 had significantly poorer treatment outcomes than rats treated with standard phenytoin, although no differences were found in the concentration of phenytoin in plasma or brain 65 min after injection.

Treatment of refractory generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus with pentobarbital anesthesia after high-dose phenytoin

We report the results of treatment of refractory generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus in 17 adults. Of 13 patients who received high-dose phenytoin (PHT, mean dose 23.8 mg/kg), seizure control was sustained in five patients. In 12 cases, anesthetic doses of pentobarbital rapidly suppressed convulsions, but sustained control required prolonged treatment. Break-through seizures were, in most cases, explained by inadequate serum pentobarbital concentrations, although we could not establish a therapeutic range of serum concentrations. EEG monitoring is necessary to assess the therapeutic response but is not a reliable index of depth of anesthesia. Some cases developed pharmacodynamic tolerance to pentobarbital. The most serious treatment complications were cardiorespiratory, but the most common and disabling side effects, although reversible, were neurologic. Fifteen patients were discharged from the hospital in stable condition; two patients died, but not as a direct consequence of treatment. Our results suggest a very good outcome of pentobarbital anesthesia for patients in refractory status epilepticus who are a reasonable medical risk and who receive optimal medical management.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical use of parenteral phenytoin, phenobarbital, and paraldehyde

Intravenous phenytoin, phenobarbital, and paraldehyde are effective and safe for the treatment of acute seizures such as status epilepticus. All of these drugs should be infused in a diluted solution and at a slow rate to minimize the occurrence of adverse effects.

Phenytoin prodrug: preclinical and clinical studies

The currently available phenytoin (PHT) solution has many disadvantages stemming from poor aqueous solubility of PHT. A novel approach to solve the problem has been the synthesis of a phosphate ester of PHT (PHT prodrug ACC-9653). This water-soluble compound is metabolized rapidly into PO4 and PHT. A four center open-label, baseline-controlled study of 43 patients with epilepsy maintained on oral twice-daily PHT monotherapy was performed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of the prodrug. Patients received an i.v. or i.m. dose of ACC-9653 at a dose equivalent to the patients' morning dose of PHT. Intravenous dosages were infused at a rate of 75 mg/min, and i.m. dosages were given as one or two injections. After a period of 6 days, during which patients were again maintained with oral PHT, they were given a dose of ACC-9653 via whichever route they had not yet received. The Tmax of the prodrug averaged 5.7 and 36 min (0.095 and 0.606 h) after i.v. and i.m. administrations, respectively. The elimination half-life of ACC-9653 (conversion from prodrug to PHT) after i.v. and i.m. administration was 8.4 and 32.7 min (0.140 and 0.545 h), respectively, and both were independent of the dose. The plasma clearance of ACC-9653 was not dependent on dose or route of administration and averaged 19.8 +/- 1.16 and 17.8 +/- 0.83 L/h after i.v. and i.m. administrations, respectively. The area under curve ratio of PHT after i.m. and i.v. ACC-9653 was 1.17 +/- 0.13 which was not significantly different from 1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Status epilepticus

Status epilepticus generally is considered to be a medical emergency requiring immediate intervention to prevent permanent injury to the brain. Tonic-clonic status epilepticus is a very frightening event; the inexperienced parents invariably believe that their child is dying. Emergent management is imperative for convulsive tonic-clonic (grand mal) status epilepticus, but there are nonconvulsive types of status epilepticus in which the problem is more one of correct diagnosis than emergent management. This article reviews aspects of status epilepticus, particularly the classification and treatment of the various types of status.

Safety, tolerance and pharmacokinetics of intravenous doses of the phosphate ester of 3-hydroxymethyl-5,5-diphenylhydantoin: a new prodrug of phenytoin

A new prodrug of phenytoin, the disodium phosphate ester of 3-hydroxymethyl-5,5-diphenylhydantoin (ACC-9653), was administered intravenously over 30 minutes to four different groups of volunteers at doses of 150, 300, 600, and 1200 mg. The prodrug and phenytoin were measured in plasma samples, collected at specified times, by specific high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assays. The prodrug, after achieving a maximum concentration at the end of the 30-minute infusion (Cmax 20, 36, 75, 129 micrograms/mL) declined rapidly with a half-life (t1/2) of about 8 minutes. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (10, 19, 43, 77 mg.hr/L) was proportional to dose whereas the total clearance, 14 L/hr, was independent of dose. The volume of distribution of the prodrug, a polar, water-soluble molecule was about 2.6 L, indicating that most of the dose remained in the plasma. The concentration of phenytoin reached 90% of its maximum about 12 minutes after the end of the infusion of ACC-9653. At the dose of 1200 mg of prodrug, the average peak concentration of phenytoin was about 17 micrograms/mL, near the upper limit of the therapeutic range. Adverse reactions (lightheadedness, nystagmus, incoordination) were minor and attributed to phenytoin. No significant abnormalities in ECG, Holter monitoring, or EEG were noted after the infusion of ACC-9653.

Cardiopulmonary arrest following intravenous phenytoin loading

Two patients, aged 44 and 68 years, presented with generalized seizures either witnessed or highly suspected. Both patients had laboratory-proven subtherapeutic anticonvulsant serum levels. The patients differed with regard to risk; one patient had existing cardiopulmonary disease, and the other was free of such risk factors except liver disease. An apparently appropriate dose of intravenous phenytoin was initiated in each case, and the patients were monitored appropriately and given supplemental oxygen. Bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory distress, and, ultimately, cardiopulmonary arrest occurred in both. The criteria proposed by Earnest et al. should be implemented for each seizure case that requires a decision on the urgent need for therapeutic anticonvulsant levels, whether by mechanical infusion, manual intravenous push, or oral loading. The mechanical infusion is the easiest method to standardize and monitor. The manual intravenous push has a greater possibility of inadvertent overdosage during some small time frame, as well as more local symptoms by some reports. Record et al. have recommended oral loading in selected patients. Careful consideration must be made of the choice of environment in which intravenous loading is done (e.g., emergency department, intensive care unit), as dictated by patient parameters, nursing staff levels, and planned disposition. The crucial factors contributing to the deterioration of both patients in the two cases presented were the concentration of phenytoin manually infused and the possibility that their high-risk status made them poor candidates for manual intravenous phenytoin. Dose and a hypersensitivity reaction were doubtful factors in these cases.

Phenytoin loading in chronic alcoholic patients

Controversy exists concerning the appropriate loading dose of phenytoin in chronic alcoholic patients. Chronic alcoholics are frequently assumed to have low albumin levels secondary to malnutrition and liver disease. Phenytoin is bound to albumin, and therefore the usual loading dose of phenytoin might result in a higher percentage of unbound drug and increased toxicity in these patients. Thirty-six chronic alcoholic patients were given a 15-mg/kg loading dose of phenytoin by constant intravenous infusion. After the infusion, patients were evaluated for clinical signs of phenytoin toxicity. At 1 hour after infusion, blood was sent for determination of total phenytoin, free phenytoin, and albumin levels. Fifteen patients were hypoalbuminemic (mean, 3.4 g/dL); 21 patients had albumin levels within the normal range (mean, 4.3 g/dL). In the hypoalbuminemic group, the mean free phenytoin level was 1.1 micrograms/mL, and the mean total phenytoin level was 13.6 micrograms/mL. In patients with normal albumin levels, the mean free phenytoin level was 1.3 micrograms/mL, and the mean total phenytoin level was 15.7 micrograms/mL. There were no statistically significant differences in total phenytoin or free phenytoin levels between either groups. No patient had a postinfusion phenytoin level (either free or total) within the toxic range. Although our sample size was small, our results suggest that a 15-mg/kg loading dose of phenytoin does not produce toxic levels in chronic alcoholics.

Antiepileptic effects under steady state of phenytoin serum levels produced in acute experiments

The antiepileptic effects of phenytoin (PHT) were examined during steady-state serum levels. Experiments were conducted on 69 adult male rabbits weighing 2.5-3.5 kg. A steady state of one or two different PHT serum levels per rabbit was produced with intravenous (i.v.) injections of loading and infusion doses. A train of focal and generalized seizure discharges (SDs) induced by electrical stimulation was compared before and after dosing with PHT. The results showed that PHT levels of 10-40 micrograms/ml induce inhibitory effects, shortening the duration of neocortical focal SDs. The inhibitory effects paralleled the PHT levels and were proportionally related to epileptogenicity in individual neocortical areas. At serum levels under approximately 5-10 micrograms/ml, the spread of secondarily generalized SDs originating from neocortical focal SDs was suppressed more than the shortening of the duration of the primary focus. On the other hand, PHT showed no effects or only slight inhibitory effects on hippocampal SDs, and the SDs spread from them even at levels of 15-40 micrograms/ml. Electroshock (ES)-induced generalized SDs were slightly suppressed in duration at levels of 20-30 micrograms/ml. Moreover, both the focal and the generalized SDs were greatly prolonged at high serum levels (greater than 40 micrograms/ml), although such facilitative effects were rare. The clinical contributions of these results to PHT treatment in human epilepsy are discussed.

Kinetics of CSF phenytoin in children

The efficacy of intravenous phenytoin for the treatment of status epilepticus is related to the rapid entry of phenytoin into brain parenchyma. There is no information concerning the correlation between phenytoin serum and CSF concentrations in children, and the application of CSF data to clinical use. We report 7 children (2-11 yrs) who were treated or exposed to phenytoin in doses between 10.5-230 mg/kg. Lumbar puncture was performed 9 times in 6 of the patients. In one patient, an intraventricular catheter permitted successive assessment of CSF phenytoin concentrations. The ratio of CSF/serum phenytoin concentrations was 0.16 +/- 0.08, with gradual increase over the first 8 hours as the serum phenytoin concentration decreased. There was good correlation between therapeutic outcome and CSF phenytoin levels higher than 2 mcg/ml. In one patient the coma state secondary to phenytoin intoxication was associated with high CSF concentration (6 mcg/ml).