Compound A

Comparison of the Level of Free Hexafluoro-isopropanol in Adults' Blood and the Incidence of Emergence Agitation After Anesthesia With Different Concentrations of Sevoflurane in Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to compare the free hexafluoro-isopropanol (HFIP) concentration in adults' blood and the incidence of emergence agitation (EA) after inhaled different concentrations of sevoflurane.

METHODS

Sixty adult patients planning to undergo laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery were randomly assigned to 3 groups. Each group received sevoflurane as the volatile anesthetic at different concentrations: 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), 1.0 MAC, and 1.5 MAC. The use of sevoflurane was continued until the end of surgery. Venous blood samples were obtained at 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after starting the use of sevoflurane and subsequently at 60, 180, and 300 minutes after discontinuation of volatile anesthetic administration. Blood concentrations of sevoflurane and free HFIP were determined using gas chromatography. The recovery time and the incidence of EA at different time points were evaluated among the 3 groups.

FINDINGS

Changes in the blood concentrations of sevoflurane and free HFIP during and after the use of sevoflurane were similar in all 3 groups. The peak blood concentration of free HFIP occurred 60 minutes after onset of sevoflurane anesthesia in all 3 groups (P < 0.05). The lowest level of free HFIP and the longest recovery time were found in the 1.5-MAC group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the incidence of EA or moderate pain among the 3 groups during recovery.

IMPLICATIONS

The generation of HFIP would be inhibited when the inhaled sevoflurane concentration increased to 1.5 MAC. However, the incidence of EA during recovery had nothing to do with the inhaled different sevoflurane concentrations (within 1.5 MAC) in adults. ChicCTR.org identifier: ChiCTR-IPD-17011558.

Toxicity of a sevoflurane degradation product incubated with rat liver and renal cortical slices

Compound A (2-fluoromethoxy-1,1,3,3,3-pentafluoro-1-propene) is a degradation product of the anesthetic sevoflurane which is created in closed-circuit anesthetic machines. Past in vivo and in vitro studies have implied that Compound A is nephrotoxic via bioactivation through the cysteine conjugate beta-lyase pathway. Although glutathione (GSH) conjugates of Compound A have been reported, it is not clear if they are formed enzymatically or via direct reaction with GSH. To determine if these metabolites are produced and toxic, a tissue slice system that first exposes male Fischer 344 rat liver slices to volatilized Compound A followed by exposure of rat kidney slices to the liver incubate was employed. Liver slices exposed to volatilized Compound A (6-12 microM medium conc.; approximately 23 ppm) exhibited a loss of K+ by 6 h, which was not seen in kidney slices exposed to Compound A. Aminobenzotriazole, a cytochrome P 450 suicide inhibitor, initially inhibits the cytotoxicity of Compound A to liver slices (at these times and concentrations). The sequential liver/kidney slice experiments using Compound A have not demonstrated nephrotoxic results. GSH conjugates were synthesized and was found to be nephrotoxic at concentrations above 91 microM (18 h), with higher concentrations showing toxicity at earlier times. Additionally, non-enzymatic reactions of Compound A with GSH or sulfhydryl-containing medium produces nephrotoxic products. These studies show that Compound A is directly toxic to the liver, possibly via P 450 activation, and Compound A can react with sulfhydryls directly to produce a nephrotoxic.

Humoral immune response to a sevoflurane degradation product in the guinea pig following inhalation exposure

Compound A (2-fluoromethoxy-1,1,3,3,3-pentafluoro-1-propene) is produced by reaction of the inhalation anesthetic, sevoflurane, with CO2 absorbents. Compound A has been reported to directly react with protein. Since adduction of proteins can transform them into antigenic material, Compound A was assessed for its ability to produce a humoral immune response. Male outbred Hartley guinea pigs (500-600 g, N = 7) were exposed via inhalation for 4 h to a subtoxic level (100 ppm) of Compound A, 3 times, at 42 day intervals. Blood samples obtained at 2, 14, 28 and 40 days after each exposure were measured for ALT, creatinine, and urea nitrogen and for the presence of antibodies to trifluoroacetylated guinea pig albumin (TFA-GSA). All indicators of liver and kidney injury remained within normal range throughout the course of the study. A humoral immune response to TFA-GSA was observed following each exposure to Compound A with a titer appearing by day 14 after exposure, peaking near day 28, and resolving to normal levels by day 40. The titer levels were approximately equivalent after each exposure and about one-third that previously seen in guinea pigs after multiple exposures to halothane. Compound A would appear to have the ability to form antigenic adducts during inhalation exposure. These findings are similar to those observed for halogenated inhalation anesthetics that have been linked to cases of immune-medicated idiosyncratic hepatitis and indicate that Compound A exposure may pose the same hazard.

The effect of anesthetic duration on kinetic and recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane, and on the kinetic characteristics of compound A, in volunteers

This study documents the differences in kinetics of 2 h (n = 7) and 4 h (n = 9) of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of desflurane (9.0%) versus (on a separate occasion) sevoflurane (3.0%), both administered in a fresh gas inflow of 2 L/min. These data are extensions of our previous 8-h (n = 7) studies of these anesthetics. By 10 min of anesthetic administration, average inspired (F(I)) and end-tidal concentration (F(A)) (F(I)/F(A); the inverse of the more commonly used F(A)/F(I)) decreased to less than 1.15 for both anesthetics, with the difference from 1.0 nearly twice as great for sevoflurane as for desflurane. During all sevoflurane administrations, F(A)/F(I) for Compound A [CH2F-O-C(=CF2) (CF3); a vinyl ether resulting from the degradation of sevoflurane by Baralyme] equaled approximately 0.8, and the average inspired concentration equaled approximately 40 ppm. Compound A is of interest because at approximately 150 ppm-h, it can induce biochemical and histological evidence of glomerular and tubular injury in rats and humans. During elimination, F(A)/F(A0) for Compound A (F(A0) is the last end-tidal concentration during anesthetic administration) decreased abruptly to 0 after 2 h and 4 h of anesthesia and to approximately 0.1 (F(A) approximately 3 ppm) after 8 h of anesthesia. In contrast, F(A)/F(A0) for desflurane and sevoflurane decreased in a conventional, multiexponential manner, the decrease being increasingly delayed with increasing duration of anesthetic administration. F(A)/F(A0) for sevoflurane exceeded that for desflurane for any given duration of anesthesia, and objective and subjective measures indicated a faster recovery with desflurane. Times (mean +/- SD) to initial response to command (2 h 10.9 +/- 1.2 vs 17.8 +/- 5.1 min, 4 h 11.3 +/- 2.1 vs 20.8 +/- 4.8 min, 8 h 14 +/- 4 vs 28 +/- 8 min) and orientation (2 h 12.7 +/- 1.6 vs 21.2 +/- 4.6 min, 4 h 14.8 +/- 3.1 vs 25.3 +/- 6.5 min, 8 h 19 +/- 4 vs 33 +/- 9 min) were shorter with desflurane. Recovery as defined by the digit symbol substitution test, P-deletion test, and Trieger test results was more rapid with desflurane. The incidence of vomiting was greater with sevoflurane after 8 h of anesthesia but not after shorter durations. We conclude that for each anesthetic duration, F(I) more closely approximates F(A) with desflurane during anesthetic administration, F(A)/F(A0) decreases more rapidly after anesthesia with desflurane, and objective measures indicate more rapid recovery with desflurane. Finally, it seems that after 2-h and 4-h administrations, all Compound A taken up is bound within the body.

IMPLICATIONS

Regardless of the duration of anesthesia, elimination is faster and recovery is quicker for the inhaled anesthetic desflurane than for the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane. The toxic degradation product of sevoflurane, Compound A, seems to bind irreversibly to proteins in the body.

Quantitative differences in the production and toxicity of CF2=BrCl versus CH2F-O-C(=CF2)(CF3) (compound A): the safety of halothane does not indicate the safety of sevoflurane

Carbon dioxide absorbents degrade both halothane and sevoflurane to toxic unsaturated compounds (CF2=CBrCl and CH2F-O-C[=CF2][CF3] [i.e., Compound A], respectively). Given the long history of safe administration of halothane, comparable toxicities of these degradation products would imply a similar safety of sevoflurane. We therefore examined CF2=CBrCl in the context of four issues relevant to previous studies of the toxicity of Compound A: 1) reactivity of the degradation product in vitro; 2) rate of its production in vitro; 3) its in vivo toxicity; 4) importance of the beta-lyase pathway to the toxicity in vivo. We found the following. 1) CF2=CBrCl is less reactive than Compound A, degrading in human serum albumin at one-fifth the rate of Compound A. 2) Over a 3-h period of "anesthesia," a standard circle system containing Baralyme (Allied Healthcare Products, Inc., St. Louis, MO) produces 30 times as much Compound A from a minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) concentration of sevoflurane as CF2=CBrCl from a MAC concentration of halothane; with soda lime, the difference is 60-fold. Correcting for differences in uptake of halothane versus sevoflurane decreases the differences to 20-40 times. 3) For a 3-h administration to rats, the partial pressure of Compound A causing minimal renal injury or necrosis of half the affected tubule cells exceeds the partial pressure of CF2=CBrCl causing minimal injury or necrosis of half the affected tubule cells by a factor of approximately 4-6. Thus, the ratio of production (Item 2 above) to the partial pressure causing injury with CF2=CBrCl is approximately a quarter of that ratio for Compound A. 4) Compounds that block the beta-lyase pathway either do not change (acivicin) or decrease (aminooxyacetic acid; AOAA) renal injury from CF2=CBrCl in rats, whereas these compounds increase (acivicin) or do not change (AOAA) injury from Compound A. We conclude that the safety of halothane cannot be used to support the safety of sevoflurane.

IMPLICATIONS

Carbon dioxide absorbents degrade halothane and sevoflurane to unsaturated compounds nephrotoxic to rats. Relative to sevoflurane's degradation product, halothane's degradation product has less toxicity relative to production, less reactivity, and a different mechanism of injury. The clinical absence of halothane nephrotoxicity does not necessarily indicate a similar absence for sevoflurane.

Dose-related biochemical markers of renal injury after sevoflurane versus desflurane anesthesia in volunteers

Sevoflurane (CH2F-O-CH[CF3]2) reacts with carbon dioxide absorbents to produce Compound A (CH2F-O-C[=CF2][CF3]). Because of concern about the potential nephrotoxicity of Compound A, the United States package label (but not that of several other countries) for sevoflurane recommends the use of fresh gas flow rates of 2 L/min or more. We previously demonstrated in humans that a 2-L/min flow rate delivery of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) sevoflurane for 8 h can injure glomeruli (i.e., produce albuminuria) and proximal tubules (i.e., produce glucosuria and urinary excretion of alpha-glutathione-S-transferase [alpha-GST]). The present report extends this investigation to fasting volunteers given 4 h (n = 9) or 2 h (n = 7) of 1.25 MAC sevoflurane versus desflurane at 2 L/min via a standard circle absorber anesthetic system (all subjects given both anesthetics). Markers of renal injury (urinary creatinine, albumin, glucose, alpha-GST, and blood urea nitrogen) did not reveal significant injury after anesthesia with desflurane. Sevoflurane degradation with a 2-L/min fresh gas inflow rate produced average inspired concentrations of Compound A of 40 +/- 4 ppm (mean +/- SD, 8-h exposure [data from previous study]), 42 +/- 2 ppm (4 h), and 40 +/- 5 ppm (2 h). Relative to desflurane, sevoflurane given for 4 h caused statistically significant transient injury to glomeruli (slightly increased urinary albumin and serum creatinine) and to proximal tubules (increased urinary alpha-GST). Other measures of injury did not differ significantly between anesthetics. Neither anesthetic given for 2 h at 1.25 MAC produced injury. We conclude that 1.25 MAC sevoflurane plus Compound A produces dose-related glomerular and tubular injury with a threshold between 80 and 168 ppm/h of exposure to Compound A. This threshold for renal injury in normal humans approximates that found previously in normal rats.

IMPLICATIONS

Human (and rat) kidneys are injured by a reactive compound (Compound A) produced by degradation of the clinical inhaled anesthetic, sevoflurane. Injury increases with increasing duration of exposure to a given concentration of Compound A. The response to Compound A has several implications, as discussed in the article.

Nephrotoxicity of sevoflurane versus desflurane anesthesia in volunteers

Present package labeling for sevoflurane recommends the use of fresh gas flow rates of 2 L/min or more when delivering anesthesia with sevoflurane. This recommendation resulted from a concern about the potential nephrotoxicity of a degradation product of sevoflurane, "Compound A," produced by the action of carbon dioxide absorbents on sevoflurane. To assess the adequacy of this recommendation, we compared the nephrotoxicity of 8 h of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) sevoflurane (n = 10) versus desflurane (n = 9) in fluid-restricted (i.e., nothing by mouth overnight) volunteers when the anesthetic was given in a standard circle absorber anesthetic system at 2 L/min. Subjects were tested for markers of renal injury (urinary albumin, glucose, alpha-glutathione-S-transferase [GST], and pi-GST; and serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen [BUN]) before and 1, 2, 3, and/or 5-7 days after anesthesia. Desflurane did not produce renal injury. Rebreathing of sevoflurane produced average inspired concentrations of Compound A of 41 +/- 3 ppm (mean +/- SD). Sevoflurane was associated with transient injury to: 1) the glomerulus, as revealed by postanesthetic albuminuria; 2) the proximal tubule, as revealed by postanesthetic glucosuria and increased urinary alpha-GST; and 3) the distal tubule, as revealed by postanesthetic increased urinary pi-GST. These effects varied greatly (e.g., on postanesthesia Day 3, the 24-h albumin excretion was < 0.03 g (normal) for one volunteer; 0.03-1 g for five others; 1-2 g for two others; 2.1 g for one volunteer; and 4.4 g for another volunteer). Neither anesthetic affected serum creatinine or BUN, nor changed the ability of the kidney to concentrate urine in response to vasopressin, 5 U/70 kg subcutaneously (i.e., these measures failed to reveal the injury produced). In addition, sevoflurane, but not desflurane, caused small postanesthetic increases in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), suggesting mild, transient hepatic injury.