Antinociceptive and neurotoxicologic screening of chronic intrathecal administration of ketorolac tromethamine in the rat

The Additive Antinociceptive Effect of Resveratrol and Ketorolac in the Formalin Test in Mice

Pain represents one of the leading causes of suffering and disability worldwide. Currently available drugs cannot treat all types of pain and may have adverse effects. Hence, the use of pharmacological combinations is an alternative treatment strategy. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the combination of resveratrol and ketorolac through isobolographic analysis. CD1 mice were used to study the antinociceptive effect of this combination using the formalin test and the study was divided into two phases. In the first phase, four individual doses of each drug were evaluated, totaling eight testing groups. From these data, the median effective doses (ED50) of each drug were calculated. In the second phase, four testing groups were used to evaluate the combination of sub-doses of both drugs and obtain the experimental ED50. To evaluate gastric damage, five groups were employed, including indomethacin, vehicle, resveratrol, ketorolac, and combined resveratrol and ketorolac groups. Stomach samples from the mice were taken after 5 h of treatment, and the area of the ulcers was determined. Resveratrol plus ketorolac elicited a reduction in nociceptive behavior during both phases of the formalin test, and isobologram analysis revealed that the theoretical and experimental ED50 values of resveratrol and ketorolac did not differ significantly, implying an additive interaction between the drugs. Additionally, the drug combination did not generate gastric ulcers, thus enhancing the desired effects without increasing the adverse effects. Consequently, these findings substantiate the efficacy of the resveratrol and ketorolac combination in the formalin test, thereby highlighting its potential as a viable alternative for alleviating pain.

The therapeutic efficacy of dexpanthenol on sciatic nerve injury in a rat model

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate histopathological, functional and bone densitometry examinations of the beneficial effects of dexpanthenol (DEX) on nerve regeneration in a rat model of peripheral nerve crush injury.Methods: Thirty adult Sprague-Dawley rats were divided equally into three groups. A crush injury was simulated in all rats by clamping the right sciatic nerve for one minute. In group 1, one day before the surgical procedure, 500 mg/kg DEX administered via intraperitoneally (ip) was initiated and continued three times in a week during the experiment period as 28 days. In group 2, rats received a dose of 10 mg/kg DEX to investigate possible effects of DEX alone. Group 3 served as the control (sciatic nerve injury) and was not given any drugs.Results: Performance was significantly lower in group 3 compared to the drug treatment groups during the rotarod test (30 rpm and 40 rpm) (p < 0.05). After a while, the rats which were able to remain on the rod was significantly lower in group 3 during the acceleration test (p < 0.05). Hot plate latency test results in group 3 were significantly lower when compared to the other groups (p < 0.05).Conclusion: DEX appears to be useful as a supportive clinical agent for the treatment of pain and nerve damage.

[Evaluation of the neurotoxic effects of intrathecal administration of (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen on rat spinal cords: randomized controlled experimental study]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intrathecal administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is more efficacious for post-operative pain management. Cyclooxygenase inhibiting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen, may be effective at lower intrathecal doses than parenteral ones. Preclinical safety regarding possible neurotoxicity associated with the intrathecal (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen was not evaluated. Here we analysed the neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen in rats.

METHODS

A randomized placebo-controlled experimental study was conducted. Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300g) aged 12-16 weeks were randomly divided into 2 treatments [100 and 800μg (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen] and control (sterile water) groups. Intrathecal catheters were placed via the atlantoaxial space in anesthetized rats. Pinch-toe tests, motor function evaluations and histopathological examinations of the spinal cord and nerve roots were performed at days 3, 7 and 21. Spinal cord sections were evaluated by light microscopy for the dorsal axonal funiculus vacuolation, axonal myelin loss, neuronal chromatolysis, neuritis, meningeal inflammation, adhesions, and fibrosis.

RESULTS

Rats in all the groups exhibited normal pinch-toe testing response (score=0) and normal gait at each observed time (motor function evaluation score=1). Neurotoxicity was higher with treatments on days 3 and 7 than that on day 21 (2, 3, 0, p=0.044; 2, 5, 0, p=0.029, respectively). On day 7, the total scores reflecting neuronal damage were higher in the 800μg group than those in the 100μg and Control Groups (5, 3, 0, p=0.048, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen caused dose-dependent neurohistopathological changes in rats on days 3 and 7 after injection, suggesting that (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen should not be intrathecally administered.

Evaluation of the neurotoxic effects of intrathecal administration of (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen on rat spinal cords: randomized controlled experimental study

Background and objectives

Intrathecal administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is more efficacious for post-operative pain management. Cyclooxygenase inhibiting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen, may be effective at lower intrathecal doses than parenteral ones. Preclinical safety regarding possible neurotoxicity associated with the intrathecal (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen was not evaluated. Here we analysed the neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen in rats.

Methods

A randomized placebo-controlled experimental study was conducted. Sprague-Dawley rats (250–300 g) aged 12–16 weeks were randomly divided into 2 treatments [100 and 800 μg (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen] and control (sterile water) groups. Intrathecal catheters were placed via the atlantoaxial space in anesthetized rats. Pinch-toe tests, motor function evaluations and histopathological examinations of the spinal cord and nerve roots were performed at days 3, 7 and 21. Spinal cord sections were evaluated by light microscopy for the dorsal axonal funiculus vacuolation, axonal myelin loss, neuronal chromatolysis, neuritis, meningeal inflammation, adhesions, and fibrosis.

Results

Rats in all the groups exhibited normal pinch-toe testing response (score = 0) and normal gait at each observed time (motor function evaluation score = 1). Neurotoxicity was higher with treatments on days 3 and 7 than that on day 21 (2, 3, 0, p = 0.044; 2, 5, 0, p = 0.029, respectively). On day 7, the total scores reflecting neuronal damage were higher in the 800 μg group than those in the 100 μg and Control Groups (5, 3, 0, p = 0.048, respectively).

Conclusion

Intrathecal (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen caused dose-dependent neurohistopathological changes in rats on days 3 and 7 after injection, suggesting that (S)-(+)-Ketoprofen should not be intrathecally administered.

Current and Future Issues in the Development of Spinal Agents for the Management of Pain

Targeting analgesic drugs for spinal delivery reflects the fact that while the conscious experience of pain is mediated supraspinally, input initiated by high intensity stimuli, tissue injury and/or nerve injury is encoded at the level of the spinal dorsal horn and this output informs the brain as to the peripheral environment. This encoding process is subject to strong upregulation resulting in hyperesthetic states and downregulation reducing the ongoing processing of nociceptive stimuli reversing the hyperesthesia and pain processing. The present review addresses the biology of spinal nociceptive processing as relevant to the effects of intrathecally-delivered drugs in altering pain processing following acute stimulation, tissue inflammation/injury and nerve injury. The review covers i) the major classes of spinal agents currently employed as intrathecal analgesics (opioid agonists, alpha 2 agonists; sodium channel blockers; calcium channel blockers; NMDA blockers; GABA A/B agonists; COX inhibitors; ii) ongoing developments in the pharmacology of spinal therapeutics focusing on less studied agents/targets (cholinesterase inhibition; Adenosine agonists; iii) novel intrathecal targeting methodologies including gene-based approaches (viral vectors, plasmids, interfering RNAs); antisense, and toxins (botulinum toxins; resniferatoxin, substance P Saporin); and iv) issues relevant to intrathecal drug delivery (neuraxial drug distribution), infusate delivery profile, drug dosing, formulation and principals involved in the preclinical evaluation of intrathecal drug safety.

The Effect of Sildenafil on Recuperation from Sciatic Nerve Injury in Rats

BACKGROUND

Severe functional and anatomical defects can be detected after the peripheral nerve injury. Pharmacological approaches are preferred rather than surgical treatment in the treatment of nerve injuries.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to perform histopathological, functional and bone densitometry examinations of the effects of sildenafil on nerve regeneration in a rat model of peripheral nerve crush injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Animal experiment.

METHODS

The study included a total of thirty adult Sprague-Dawley rats that were divided into three groups of ten rats each. In all rats, a crush injury was created by clamping the right sciatic nerve for one minute. One day before the procedure, rats in group 1 were started on a 28-day treatment consisting of a daily dose of 20 mg/kg body weight sildenafil citrate given orally via a nasogastric tube, while the rats in group 2 were started on an every-other-day dose of 10 mg/kg body weight sildenafil citrate. Rats from group 3 were not administered any drugs. Forty-two days after the nerve damage was created, functional and histopathological examination of both sciatic nerves and bone densitometric evaluation of the extremities were conducted.

RESULTS

During the rotarod test, rats from group 3 spent the least amount of time on the rod compared to the drug treatment groups at speeds of 20 rpm, 30 rpm and 40 rpm. In addition, the duration for which each animal could stay on the rod throughout the accelerod test significantly reduced in rats from group 3 compared to rats from groups 1 and 2 in the 4-min test. For the hot-plate latency time, there were no differences among the groups in either the basal level or after sciatic nerve injury. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the static sciatic index (SSI) on the 42(nd) day (p=0.147). The amplitude was better evaluated in group 1 compared to the other two groups (p<0.05). Under microscopic evaluation, we observed the greatest amount of nerve regeneration in group 1 and the lowest in group 3. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the bone mineral density (BMD) levels among the groups.

CONCLUSION

We believe that a daily single dose of sildenafil plays an important role in the treatment of sciatic nerve damage and bone healing and thus can be used as supportive clinical treatment.

Intrathecal ketorolac enhances intrathecal morphine analgesia following total knee arthroplasty

Background:

Total knee arthroplasty represents one of the most painful surgeries. The aim of the study was to compare analgesia and adverse effects of intrathecal (IT) ketorolac versus IT morphine, versus the combination of IT ketorolac and morphine.

Materials and Methods:

After ethical approval and patient consent, 80 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty were randomized to one of 4 groups. All groups received 15 mg IT bupivacaine plus IT test drug (2 ml). The control group (CG) received saline as IT test drug. The morphine group (MG) received IT 200 g morphine, the ketorolac group (KG) IT 2 mg ketorolac and the morphine-ketorolac group (MKG) 200 g morphine + 2 mg ketorolac as test drugs. Pain and adverse effects were evaluated. P > 0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

The MG and KG were similar in their times to time to first rescue analgesic (440 ± 38 min and 381 ± 44 min, respectively). Both groups were longer when compared to the CG (170 ± 13 min) (P > 0.01). The MG and KG had lesser ketoprofen consumption compared to the CG (P > 0.05). The time to first rescue analgesic was longer to the MKG (926 ± 222 min) (15 h) compared to CG (P > 0.001) and to the MG and the KG (P > 0.01). MKG displayed lesser ketoprofen consumption compared to MG and KG (P > 0.05) and to the CG (P > 0.02).

Conclusions:

The data suggest a role for spinal ketorolac and morphine in orthopaedic surgery because this combination of agents provided 15 h of analgesia compared to 7 h after each drug alone, with no significant side-effects.

The comparison of neuroprotective effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and metilprednisolone in spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is the investigation of the effects of intrathecally injected dexmedetomidine and methylprednisolone and their dominancy over one another in rats with generated Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).

METHODS

40, female, adult Wistar Albino rats weighing 220-260 g were included in the study. The rats were fixed with Intrathecal catheter (IT) and divided into four groups. All subjects were applied T7-10 laminectomy after catheter. Group S (n:10) was injected with IT 10 μL isotonic saline; Group C (n:10) with IT 10 μL isotonic saline after SCI; Group D (n:10) with IT one doze 10 μL of dexmedetomidine after SCI; Group M (n:10) IT one dose 10 μL of methylprednisolone. The subjects were sacrificed 72 h after this operation. The damaged area was removed biochemically and histopathologically examined.

RESULTS

Antioxidant and inflammatory parameters searched for in all damages tissue were statistically different in all groups from group S. They were different in group M and group D than group C (p < 0.001). After the comparison of group D and group M, PON and IL6 values were higher in group D (p = 0.003, p = 0.035) while the other two biochemical parameters were similar in both groups (Table 1). After histopathologic trials, edemas, bleeding and necrosis were found less in group S while at the most in group C (p < 0.001). In group M and group D, however, they were higher than group S and lower than group C (p < 0.001). After the comparison of group D and group M, while there was no difference in terms of edema necrosis, the amount of bleeding was lower in group D (p < 0.001) (Table 2).

CONCLUSIONS

It has been discovered that intrathecal use of dexmedetomidine caused neuroprotective effects similar to methylprednisolone.

Sniffing out endodontic pain: use of an intranasal analgesic in a randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Orofacial pain is a common encounter in dentistry (affecting 12% of the population) and is a primary reason for patients seeking emergency care. Dentists often prescribe oral analgesics, which have disadvantages of decreased absorption rates and delayed onset. Intranasal (IN) delivery takes advantage of a large surface area of mucosal tissue for rapid absorption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IN ketorolac for endodontic pain using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design study.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients presenting with moderate to severe endodontic pain were selected to receive IN treatment with placebo (n = 11) or ketorolac (n = 11) 30 minutes before endodontic treatment was started and immediately after the completion of endodontic treatment. Baseline pain levels were recorded before IN treatment. Pain levels were also recorded at 15 and 30 minutes after the initial IN dosing (before endodontic treatment); 30 minutes after completion of endodontic treatment; and 4, 8, and 12 hours after the initial IN spray. Primary analysis was a repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

IN ketorolac alone or with endodontic treatment showed significantly better pain relief compared with IN placebo spray alone or with endodontic treatment at 30 minutes after the first or second intranasal dose and at 4 hours after the first intranasal dose (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that IN ketorolac may provide a novel and efficacious method for pain relief in endodontic pain patients.

Neuroprotective effects of ketorolac tromethamine after spinal cord injury in rats: an ultrastructural study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of intrathecally administered ketorolac tromethamine on ultrastructural changes of the spinal cord in spinal cord-traumatised rats.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats were used and divided into three groups for this study. The rats in Group S (n=6) were control animals and received 10 mul of saline. Groups K50 (n=6) and K400 (n=6) received intrathecally 50 mug and 400 mug of ketorolac tromethamine, respectively, immediately after trauma was induced. All rats underwent laminectomy and the spinal cord was traumatised using the clip-compression technique. Electron microscopic examination of the cord samples was carried out 3 days after spinal cord injury.

RESULTS

Ultrastructural findings showed severe injury with extensive axoplasmic and cytoplasmic oedema in Group S. Minor neural damage occurred in Group K50 and increased ultrastructural protection was observed in the Group K400.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that intrathecal administration of ketorolac tromethamine protects the spinal cord following injury in rats.

Protective effect of intrathecal ketorolac in spinal cord ischemia in rats: a microdialysis study

BACKGROUND

The prevention of ischemic paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic surgery is challenging for both anesthesiologists and surgeons. In a previous study, we showed that intrathecal ketorolac pre-treatment protects rats against ischemic spinal cord injury. In the present study, using a microdialysis method, we investigated whether this neuroprotective effect was related to changes in the spinal cord release of nitric oxide (NO) or the excitatory amino acids (EAAs) aspartate and glutamate.

METHODS

Rats were randomized to receive either intrathecal saline or ketorolac 60 microg (10 rats per group), 1 h before spinal cord ischemic injury induced by balloon inflation of a 2F Fogarty catheter in the thoracic aorta with maintenance of the proximal arterial blood pressure at 40 mmHg for 11 min, followed by reperfusion. Another 10 animals were used as the sham-operated control group. Ischemic injury was assessed by hind limb motor function. Cerebrospinal fluid dialysates were collected at baseline (before ischemia) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h after the start of reperfusion, and were analyzed for EAAs using high-performance liquid chromatography and for NO metabolites using an NO analyzer.

RESULTS

The results showed that intrathecal ketorolac attenuated spinal cord ischemic injury. Dialysate concentrations of NO and EAAs were increased after spinal cord ischemia, and this effect was inhibited by intrathecal administration of ketorolac.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the neuroprotective effect of intrathecal ketorolac in spinal cord ischemia in rats may be caused by a decrease in the spinal cord release of NO and EAAs.

An improved procedure for catheterization of the thoracic spinal subarachnoid space in the rat

Catheterization of the subarachnoid space provides a convenient means to deliver drugs to, or collect cerebrospinal fluid from, the spinal cord in animal experiments, and has been instrumental to our understanding of spinal mechanisms that underlie anesthesia, analgesia, or cardiovascular regulation. Experience gained over the years has revealed several shortcomings of this technique. We report a procedure that encompasses the benefits of direct subarachnoid catheterization of the rat thoracic spinal cord but circumvents the known shortcomings. An intrathecal catheter was fabricated with a small silicon bead at one end of a PE-10 catheter, which was cannulated with a 4/0 suture that served as a guide. Using the L-shape hook of the suture guide as an anchorage, the catheter was advanced into the subarachnoid space until the silicon bead was lodged on a drilled hole (2 x 2 mm) over the lamina proper on the T13 vertebrae. With less surgical trauma, greater precision of placement and firmer anchorage of the catheter, less leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, and minimal mortality or morbidity, our modified procedure for catheterization of the thoracic spinal subarachnoid space in the rat compared favorably to previously reported methods.

Intrathecal ketorolac pretreatment reduced spinal cord ischemic injury in rats

Paraplegia caused by spinal cord ischemic injury remains a potential complication of surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Studies suggest that cyclooxygenase (COX) contributes to ischemic neuronal damage and that COX inhibitors may reduce injury. In this study, we examined whether intrathecal pretreatment with ketorolac, a nonselective COX inhibitor, had a protective effect against ischemic spinal cord injury in rats. Rats were randomized to receive either intrathecal normal saline, ketorolac 30 microg, or ketorolac 60 microg (n = 6 rats per group) 1 h before spinal cord ischemia (intraaortic balloon occlusion combined with proximal arterial hypotension for 11 min). Another 6 rats served as the sham-operated controls. Ischemic injury was assessed by hindlimb motor function and by histopathological changes in the lumbar spinal cord at 24 h after the ischemic insult. The other 20 rats (n = 10 per group) were used in the second experiments to evaluate the safety of this drug. Survival of rats was recorded 28 days after reperfusion. Intrathecal pretreatment with 60 microg of ketorolac significantly reduced neuronal death and improved hindlimb motor function, and the long-term survival was similar to that in the control group. The results suggest that intrathecal ketorolac may be of therapeutic potential for preventing spinal cord ischemic injury during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase expression of inducible COX-2 isoform of cyclooxygenase in spinal cord of rats with adjuvant induced inflammation

Several lines of evidence have accumulated that release of excitatory amino acids, nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) play a critical role in the development of peripheral tactile and thermal hypersensitivity in chronic inflammatory pain models. Synthesis of PGE2 is controlled by cyclooxygenase (COX), either the COX-1 or COX-2 isoform. COX-2 plays a central role in the inflammatory reactions. The relationship between central sensitization of a complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) induced inflammation and expressions of COX-2 were assessed in a rat model of CFA injection induced inflammation. Moreover, the time course of analgesia and spinal COX-2 expression following intrathecal (IT) injection with a nonspecific COX inhibitor (ketorolac) and COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) were determined using Western blot and immunohistochemistry. COX-2 protein was slightly increased in the lumbosacral spinal cord at 24 h following subcutaneous injection of CFA in the plantar surface of the left hindpaw (p > 0.05). COX-1 was not detected in normal and CFA injection rats. Surprisingly, IT ketorolac or celecoxib significantly increased spinal COX-2 levels at 1 h post-IT injection (p < 0.05) both in inflamed and non-inflamed rats. Then, spinal COX-2 levels declined at 3 and 6 h post-IT injection. These results provide strong in vivo evidence that COX-2 activity but not level may play a central role in the Freund's adjuvant-induced inflammation. However, spinal COX-2 level was upregulated following IT ketorolac and celecoxib injection. These data implies that suppression of PGE2 activity may induce the expression of spinal COX-2 in Freund's adjuvant-induced pain model. Our study concludes that IT administration of COX-2 inhibitor or nonspecific COX inhibitor is associated with significant short-term increase in spinal COX-2 expression.