Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring: how accurate is enough?

Non-invasive quantification of total hemoglobin concentrations by visible-light spectroscopic optical coherence tomography: a validation study on healthy volunteers

Clinically, a high demand exists for the noninvasive assessment of total hemoglobin concentrations in vulnerable patient groups. Despite the sensitivity of many optical modalities to the absorption of hemoglobin, it has remained challenging to optically measure hemoglobin concentrations noninvasively with sufficient accuracy. Compared to other optical modalities, visible-light spectroscopic optical coherence tomography (vis-sOCT) has the unique ability to quantify optical properties within highly confined tissue volumes. However, total hemoglobin quantification in vivo is still limited due to a lack of dedicated acquisition schemes, processing methods, and validation against a gold standard. In this work, we introduce an approach that combines optical angiography with spatially resolved visible-light spectroscopy to obtain clinically representative estimations of the total hemoglobin concentration in the skin microcirculation. We validate our approach in vivo on a group of 27 healthy volunteers against hemoglobin measurements on venous blood samples with a commercial blood analyzer. The measured hemoglobin concentration by vis-sOCT correlates moderately, but significantly with the blood analyzer (R = 0.47, p = 0.015). This approach quantifies hemoglobin with a mean bias of 0.6 g dL-1 and an average standard deviation of 1.3 g dL-1 in the healthy hemoglobin range (14-19 g dL-1). Moreover, the results highlight the known influence of gender on the comparison between the microcirculatory and venous hemoglobin concentration. This observed influence of gender further suggests that vis-sOCT is sensitive to microcirculatory changes in hemoglobin concentration.

Prospective Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring in the Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty Setting

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is increasingly being performed as an outpatient (i.e., same-day discharge) procedure. Postoperatively, orthostatic hypotension or pain-related tachycardia can lead to concerns regarding the hemoglobin (Hgb) level of the patient prior to discharge. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the reliability and accuracy of, and patient and nurse satisfaction with, postoperative noninvasive hemoglobin (nHgb) monitoring compared with an invasive serum hemoglobin (iHgb) laboratory draw in the outpatient TJA setting.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 200 patients undergoing outpatient unilateral TJA, of whom 157 were ultimately included in our analysis (94 hips, 63 knees). Postoperatively, both nHgb and iHgb values were obtained at a mean of 36 minutes apart. Surveys were completed by patients and nurses. The strength of the agreement between the 2 Hgb monitoring methods was evaluated with use of the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to investigate the ability of nHgb monitoring to predict an iHgb of <11.2 g/dL (the 5th-percentile iHgb value).

RESULTS

The mean preoperative iHgb was 14.2 ± 1.1 g/dL. The mean postoperative iHgb and nHgb values were 13.3 ± 1.5 and 13.3 ± 1.2 g/dL, respectively. The Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were -3.2 and +3.1 g/dL, indicating that 95% of patients' iHgb values are expected to fall between these limits relative to the nHgb value of the patient. The CCC and ICC were both 0.33. An nHgb cutoff value of <12.7 g/dL had 100% sensitivity and 67% specificity for detecting an iHgb of <11.2 g/dL. Patients reported less pain with the nHgb test than with the iHgb test (mean pain score, 0.0 versus 1.8; p < 0.001), and 97% of patients preferred the nHgb test. Following the nHgb test, 73% of responding patients and 83% of responding nurses were "somewhat more reassured" to "significantly more reassured" about same-day discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine nHgb testing can rapidly screen patients undergoing outpatient TJA for acute anemia prior to discharge. With an nHgb of <12.7 g/dL, there was perfect sensitivity and 67% specificity for detecting an iHgb of <11.2 g/dL. Most patients and nurses felt more reassured about same-day discharge after nHgb monitoring.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The correlation of non-invasive hemoglobin testing and lab hemoglobin in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The decision regarding intraoperative transfusion has traditionally been based on hemodynamic instability and estimated blood loss. We performed a systematic review to determine the validity of the oximetry method compared to standard of care for hemoglobin measurement.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted, and several libraries were searched from inception to March 31,2023. The primary outcome was comparing the mean difference between laboratory-derived hemoglobin and non-invasive, point-of-care hemoglobin measurement. Subgroup analysis included comparing the mean difference in the pediatric population and among female patients.

RESULTS

A total of 276 studies were identified, and 37 were included. We found that the pooled mean difference varied qualitatively between adult and pediatric population (p value for heterogeneity <0.001). In adult populations, lab hemoglobin measurements were on average slightly higher than non-invasive measurements (mean difference = 0.23; 95% CI -0.13, 0.59), though there was greater heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 97%, p value = <0.001). In the pediatric population, most studies showed lab hemoglobin to be slightly lower (mean difference = -0.42; 95% CI -0.87 to 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, there was no clinically significant difference in mean hemoglobin among adult and pediatric populations. The percentage of female participants had no effect on the mean difference in hemoglobin.

Optimizing haemoglobin measurements in VLBW newborns: Insights from a comparative retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Haemoglobin levels assessment is a crucial part of neonatal intensive care practice, the painful experience of repeated heel pricks and venepunctures blood sampling may negatively affect neonatal clinical course. To date the reliability of haemoglobin levels obtained by point-of-care testing (POCT) analysis if compared to standard blood cell count remains controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study conducted on all inborn premature infants (gestational age < 32 weeks) admitted to NICU of the IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute during the period May 2021-April 2023. We considered blood samplings occurred within the first 28 days of life recording the laboratory haemoglobin levels (Hblab) (reference method), the point-of-care haemoglobin levels (HbPOCT) (alternative method) and the type of puncture (arterial, venous and capillary). A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to evaluate the Hb agreement, it determines the bias (mean difference between the reference and alternative methods) and limits of agreement (LOA; lower, l-LOA; upper, u-LOA) of measures. An acceptable limit of agreement was 1 g/dl according to the existing literature.

RESULTS

We considered 845 blood samplings from 189 enrolled patients. The comparison between the reference and the alternative method showed a good agreement for the capillary sampling technique with l-LOA of -0.717 (-0.776; -0.659) and u-LOA of 0.549 (0.490; 0.607), these results were not achievable with the other techniques, with LOAs over ±1 g/dl threshold (venous

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability of capillary POCT measured haemoglobin levels may reduce clinical-related costs and the number of painful experiences, with obvious positive effects on the daily neonatal life in the NICU and on the developing brain structures.

Collapse

Key Words

• Capillary sampling
• Haemoglobin
• Neurodevelopment
• Newborn
• POCT
• Procedural pain

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Infant
• Humans
• Infant, Newborn
• Retrospective Studies
• Reproducibility of Results
• Hemoglobins/analysis
• Point-of-Care Testing
• Infant, Premature

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Andrea Calandrino Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Carolina Montobbio Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy.
Irene Bonato Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Gaia Cipresso Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Francesco Vinci Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Samuele Caruggi Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Marcella Battaglini Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Chiara Andreato Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Federica Mongelli Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Paolo Massirio Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Giorgia Brigati Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Diego Minghetti Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy
Luca Antonio Ramenghi Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophtalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini Institute, 16147 Genoa, Italy

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Accuracy of point-of-care testing devices for haemoglobin in the operating room: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care tests (POCT) for haemoglobin are increasingly used to guide intraoperative transfusion. However, their accuracy compared to central laboratory tests is unknown. The objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of method comparison studies assessing the accuracy of POCT versus central laboratory haemoglobin tests in patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2020 (updated August 2023). Any methodological approach comparing haemoglobin measurements between POCT and central laboratory in patients undergoing surgery under anaesthesia in the operating room were included. Data abstraction was guided by PRISMA and risk of bias was assessed by QUADAS-2. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. Outcomes included mean differences between POCT and central laboratory haemoglobin with associated standard deviations and 95% limits of agreement (LOA).

RESULTS

Of 3057 citations, 34 studies were included (n = 2427, 6857 paired measurements). Several devices were compared (pulse co-oximetry, n = 25; HemoCue, n = 10; iSTAT, n = 6; blood gas analysers, n = 10; haematology analyser, n = 2). Median sample size was 41 patients, and 11 studies were funded by device manufacturers. Fifteen of 34 studies had low risk of bias. Pooled mean differences (95% LOA) were: pulse co-oximeters 2.3 g/l (-25.2-29.8), HemoCue -0.3 g/l (-11.1-10.5), iSTAT -0.3 g/l (-8.4-7.8) and blood gas analysers -2.6 g/l (-17.8-12.7).

CONCLUSION

All POCT examining intraoperative haemoglobin measurement yielded pooled mean difference LOAs larger than the allowable limit difference of ±4 g/dl. Intraoperative haemoglobin measured by POCT should not be considered interchangeable with central laboratory values and caution is necessary when using these tests to guide intraoperative transfusion.

Point-of-care haemoglobin accuracy and transfusion outcomes in non-cardiac surgery at a Canadian tertiary academic hospital: protocol for the PREMISE observational study

INTRODUCTION

Transfusions in surgery can be life-saving interventions, but inappropriate transfusions may lack clinical benefit and cause harm. Transfusion decision-making in surgery is complex and frequently informed by haemoglobin (Hgb) measurement in the operating room. Point-of-care testing for haemoglobin (POCT-Hgb) is increasingly relied on given its simplicity and rapid provision of results. POCT-Hgb devices lack adequate validation in the operative setting, particularly for Hgb values within the transfusion zone (60-100 g/L). This study aims to examine the accuracy of intraoperative POCT-Hgb instruments in non-cardiac surgery, and the association between POCT-Hgb measurements and transfusion decision-making.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PREMISE is an observational prospective method comparison study. Enrolment will occur when adult patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery require POCT-Hgb, as determined by the treating team. Three concurrent POCT-Hgb results, considered as index tests, will be compared with a laboratory analysis of Hgb (lab-Hgb), considered the gold standard. Participants may have multiple POCT-Hgb measurements during surgery. The primary outcome is the difference in individual Hgb measurements between POCT-Hgb and lab-Hgb, primarily among measurements that are within the transfusion zone. Secondary outcomes include POCT-Hgb accuracy within the entire cohort, postoperative morbidity, mortality and transfusion rates. The sample size is 1750 POCT-Hgb measurements to obtain a minimum of 652 Hgb measurements <100 g/L, based on an estimated incidence of 38%. The sample size was calculated to fit a logistic regression model to predict instances when POCT-Hgb are inaccurate, using 4 g/L as an acceptable margin of error.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Institutional ethics approval has been obtained by the Ottawa Health Science Network-Research Ethics Board prior to initiating the study. Findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant scientific conferences. Social media will be leveraged to further disseminate the study results and engage with clinicians.

Clinical and Analytic Accuracy of Simultaneously Acquired Hemoglobin Measurements: A Multi-Institution Cohort Study to Minimize Redundant Laboratory Usage

OBJECTIVES

Frequent diagnostic blood sampling contributes to anemia among critically ill children. Reducing duplicative hemoglobin testing while maintaining clinical accuracy can improve patient care efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine the analytical and clinical accuracy of simultaneously acquired hemoglobin measurements with different methods.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two U.S. children's hospitals.

PATIENTS

Children (< 18 yr old) admitted to the PICU.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified hemoglobin results from complete blood count (CBC) panels paired with blood gas (BG) panels and point-of-care (POC) devices. We estimated analytic accuracy by comparing hemoglobin distributions, correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman bias. We measured clinical accuracy with error grid analysis and defined mismatch zones as low, medium, or high risk-based on deviance from unity and risk of therapeutic error. We calculated pairwise agreement to a binary decision to transfuse based on a hemoglobin value. Our cohort includes 49,004 ICU admissions from 29,926 patients, resulting in 85,757 CBC-BG hemoglobin pairs. BG hemoglobin was significantly higher (mean bias, 0.43-0.58 g/dL) than CBC hemoglobin with similar Pearson correlation ( R2 ) (0.90-0.91). POC hemoglobin was also significantly higher, but of lower magnitude (mean bias, 0.14 g/dL). Error grid analysis revealed only 78 (< 0.1%) CBC-BG hemoglobin pairs in the high-risk zone. For CBC-BG hemoglobin pairs, at a BG hemoglobin cutoff of greater than 8.0 g/dL, the "number needed to miss" a CBC hemoglobin less than 7 g/dL was 275 and 474 at each institution, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pragmatic two-institution cohort of greater than 29,000 patients, we show similar clinical and analytic accuracy of CBC and BG hemoglobin. Although BG hemoglobin values are higher than CBC hemoglobin values, the small magnitude is unlikely to be clinically significant. Application of these findings may reduce duplicative testing and decrease anemia among critically ill children.

Validation of non-invasive point of care blood content analysis using the TensorTip™ MTX device: a method comparison study

OBJECTIVES

The TensorTip™ MTX is a non-invasive device designed to determine several physiological parameters with additional analysis of haemoglobin, haematocrit and blood gas analysis by interpreting blood diffusion colour of the finger skin based on spectral analysis. The aim of our study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of the TensorTip MTX in a clinical setting in comparison with routine analysis of blood samples.

METHODS

Forty-six patients, scheduled for elective surgery, were enrolled in this study. Placement of an arterial catheter had to be part of the standard of care. Measurements were performed during the perioperative period. The measurements obtained with the TensorTip MTX were compared with the results of routine analysis of the blood samples as a reference using correlation, Bland-Altman analysis and mountain plots.

RESULTS

No significant correlation was present in the measurements. Measurement of haemoglobin with the TensorTip MTX had a mean bias of 0.4 mmol/L, haematocrit's bias was 3.0 %. Bias of partial pressure of carbon dioxide and oxygen was 3.6 and 66.6 mmHg, respectively. Calculated percentage errors were 48.2 , 48.9, 39.9 and 109.0 %. Proportional bias was present in all Bland-Altman analyses. Less than 95 % of the differences fell within the pre-set limits of allowable error.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-invasive blood content analysis with the TensorTip MTX device is not equivalent to and did not correlate sufficiently with conventional laboratory analysis. None of the parameters measured showed results within the limits of allowable error. Therefore, the use of the TensorTip MTX is not recommended for perioperative care.

Evaluation of the use of non-invasive hemoglobin measurement in early childhood

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anemia in children affects psychomotor development. We compared the accuracy and trend of a non-invasive transcutaneous spectrophotometric estimation of arterial hemoglobin (Hb) concentration (SpHb) by rainbow pulse CO-oximetry technology to the invasive blood Hb concentration measured by an automated clinical analyzer (Hb-Lab).

METHODS

We measured the SpHb and Hb-Lab in 109 patients aged 1-5 years. Regression analysis was used to evaluate differences between the two methods. The bias, accuracy, precision, and limits of agreement of SpHb compared with Hb-Lab were calculated using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

Of the 109 enrolled subjects, 102 pairs of the SpHb and Hb-Lab datasets were collected. The average value of measured Hb was 12.9 ± 1.03 (standard deviation [SD]) g/dL for Hb-Lab. A significant correlation was observed between SpHb and Hb-Lab measurements (SpHb = 7.002 + 0.4722 Hb-Lab, correlation coefficient r = 0.548, 95% confidence interval = 0.329-0.615). Bland-Altman analysis showed good visual agreement, with a mean bias between SpHb and Hb-Lab of 0.188 ± 0.919 g/dL (mean ± SD).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that non-invasive Hb measurement is useful for Hb estimation in children and provides new insights as a screening tool for anemia.

IMPACT

Our results indicated a good correlation between non-invasive transcutaneous spectrophotometric estimation of arterial hemoglobin (Hb) concentration using a finger probe sensor by rainbow pulse CO-oximetry technology and invasive blood Hb concentration. Although previous studies have indicated that in patients with a worse condition, the bias between the two methods was large, this study, which was conducted on children with stable disease, showed a relatively small bias. Further studies using this non-invasive device might help to understand the current status of anemia in Japan and promote iron intake and nutritional management in children.

Current Status of Measurement Accuracy for Total Hemoglobin Concentration in the Clinical Context

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this investigation is to provide data about the accuracy of total hemoglobin concentration measurements with respect to clinical settings, and to devices within the categories of point-of-care and reference systems. In particular, tolerance of hemoglobin concentrations below 9 g/dL that have become common in clinical practice today determines the need to demonstrate the limits of measurement accuracy in patient care.

METHODS

Samples extracted from six units of heparinized human blood with total hemoglobin concentrations ranging from 3 to 18 g/dL were assigned to the test devices in a random order. The pool of test devices comprised blood gas analyzers, an automatic hematology analyzer, a laboratory reference method, and the point-of-care system HemoCue. To reduce the pre-analytic error, each sample was measured three times. Due to the characteristics of the tested devices and methods, we selected the mean values of the data from all these devices, measured at the corresponding total hemoglobin concentrations, as the reference.

MAIN RESULTS

The measurement results of the test devices overlap within strict limits (R2 = 0.999). Only the detailed analysis provides information about minor but systematic deviations. In the group of clinically relevant devices, which are involved in patient blood management decisions, the relative differences were within the limit of +/- 5 % for values down to 3 g/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinically relevant change of +/- 0.5 g/dL of total hemoglobin concentration can be detected with all selected devices and methods. Compliance with more stringent definitions-these are the relative differences of 5 % in relation to the corresponding reference values and the clinically adapted thresholds in the format of a tolerance level analysis-was achieved by the clinical devices assessed here.

Non-invasive Hemoglobin Measurement Predictive Analytics with Missing Data and Accuracy Improvement Using Gaussian Process and Functional Regression Model

Recent use of noninvasive and continuous hemoglobin (SpHb) concentration monitor has emerged as an alternative to invasive laboratory-based hematological analysis. Unlike delayed laboratory based measures of hemoglobin (HgB), SpHb monitors can provide real-time information about the HgB levels. Real-time SpHb measurements will offer healthcare providers with warnings and early detections of abnormal health status, e.g., hemorrhagic shock, anemia, and thus support therapeutic decision-making, as well as help save lives. However, the finger-worn CO-Oximeter sensors used in SpHb monitors often get detached or have to be removed, which causes missing data in the continuous SpHb measurements. Missing data among SpHb measurements reduce the trust in the accuracy of the device, influence the effectiveness of hemorrhage interventions and future HgB predictions. A model with imputation and prediction method is investigated to deal with missing values and improve prediction accuracy. The Gaussian process and functional regression methods are proposed to impute missing SpHb data and make predictions on laboratory-based HgB measurements. Within the proposed method, multiple choices of sub-models are considered. The proposed method shows a significant improvement in accuracy based on a real-data study. Proposed method shows superior performance with the real data, within the proposed framework, different choices of sub-models are discussed and the usage recommendation is provided accordingly. The modeling framework can be extended to other application scenarios with missing values.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Intraoperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work was to carry out a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing intraoperative RBC transfusion strategies to determine their impact on postoperative morbidity, mortality, and blood product use.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

RBC transfusions are common in surgery and associated with widespread variability despite adjustment for casemix. Evidence-based recommendations guiding RBC transfusion in the operative setting are limited.

METHODS

The search strategy was adapted from a previous Cochrane Review. Electronic databases were searched from January 2016 to February 2021. Included studies from the previous Cochrane Review were considered for eligibility from before 2016. RCTs comparing intraoperative transfusion strategies were considered for inclusion. Co-primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and morbidity. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and perioperative RBC transfusion. Meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials (8641 patients) were included. One cardiac surgery trial accounted for 56% of patients. There was no difference in 30-day mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.29] and pooled postoperative morbidity among the studied outcomes when comparing restrictive and liberal protocols. Two trials reported worse composite outcomes with restrictive triggers. Intraoperative (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.43-0.64) and perioperative (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.79) blood transfusions were significantly lower in the restrictive group compared to the liberal group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative restrictive transfusion strategies decreased perioperative transfusions without added postoperative morbidity and mortality in 12/14 trials. Two trials reported worse outcomes. Given trial design and generalizability limitations, uncertainty remains regarding the safety of broad application of restrictive transfusion triggers in the operating room. Trials specifically designed to address intraoperative transfusions are urgently needed.

Evaluation of the accuracy of a non-invasive hemoglobin-monitoring device in schoolchildren

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a public health problem in children and adolescents that is characterized by reduced hemoglobin (Hb) levels. Non-invasive monitoring devices can measure Hb levels continuously without pain or discomfort; however, little is known about their accuracy in children and adolescents. This study estimated the accuracy of a non-invasive Hb monitor in this age group.

METHODS

Participants were outpatients visiting the Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center for blood tests between January and March 2019. Hb levels were measured using both non-invasive Astrim Fit monitoring devices and invasive blood collection followed by automated analysis. Bland-Altman analysis assessed the agreement between the two measurements.

RESULTS

Overall, 120 schoolchildren (9-15 years old, 51 % female) were enrolled. The non-invasive measuring device recorded Hb levels of 13.5 ± 1.6 g/dL (mean ± standard deviation [SD]), while the mean Hb level obtained from the collected blood was 13.7 ± 1.7 g/dL. Therefore, the mean difference of bias and SD of precision was 0.17 ± 1.95 g/dL. Values of lower and upper limits of agreement were -3.65 and 3.99, respectively. There was no systematic fixed or proportion bias. Fifty-nine participants (49 %) had a relative error of ± 0.10.

CONCLUSION

The Astrim Fit non-invasive Hb monitor can be used to evaluate Hb levels among schoolchildren for health promotion or research purposes because of its extremely low bias (or precision), no systematic biases (including fixed or proportion biases), and positive correlation between non-invasive monitoring and blood drawing. However, it is difficult to assess Hb levels in children and adolescents using the Astrim Fit device for diagnostic purposes.

Improving Non-invasive Hemoglobin Measurement Accuracy Using Nonparametric Models

Uncontrolled hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable death among patients with trauma. Early recognition of hemorrhage can aid in the decision to administer blood transfusion and improve patient outcomes. To provide real-time measurement and continuous monitoring of hemoglobin concentration, the non-invasive and continuous hemoglobin (SpHb) measurement device has drawn extensive attention in clinical practice. However, the accuracy of such a device varies in different scenarios, so the use is not yet widely accepted. This article focuses on using statistical nonparametric models to improve the accuracy of SpHb measurement device by considering measurement bias among instantaneous measurements and individual evolution trends. In the proposed method, the robust locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) method and the Kernel regression model are considered to address those issues. Overall performance of the proposed method was evaluated by cross-validation, which showed a substantial improvement in accuracy with an 11.3% reduction of standard deviation, 23.7% reduction of mean absolute error, and 28% reduction of mean absolute percentage error compared to the original measurements. The effects of patient demographics and initial medical condition were analyzed and deemed to not have a significant effect on accuracy. Because of its high accuracy, the proposed method is highly promising to be considered to support transfusion decision-making and continuous monitoring of hemoglobin concentration. The method also has promise for similar advancement of other diagnostic devices in healthcare.

The effect of digital nerve block on the accuracy of hemoglobin monitoring during surgery: A randomized clinical trial

Background: The decision to transfuse blood products to patients during surgery is critical, due to the potential complications and costs of transfusion. Measuring hemoglobin level by spectrophotometry (SpHb) plays an important role in making this decision. The accuracy of SpHb depends on the finger perfusion. Since digital nerve blocks (DNB) can enhance blood circulation, we aimed at investigating DNB effects on the accuracy of SpHb. Methods: Patients undergoing spine surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received DNB in the left hand, and group B received DNB in the right hand. In each group, the other hand was considered as the control. Rainbow adult ReSposable sensors were attached to the patients’ both hands. Before surgical incision and every 1.5 hours, the SpHb values of both hands and the perfusion index were recorded. Concomitantly, arterial blood samples were drawn and sent to the lab for hemoglobin concentration measurement. This served as the gold standard for assessing hemoglobin levels (labHb). We used a mixed-effects generalized linear model to test the effect of independent variables on the difference between SpHb and labHb at each time point. Results: The SpHb displayed higher hemoglobin levels than those assessed by the lab. For lower labHb values, the SpHb-labHb differences were larger. A one-unit decrease in labHb increased the difference between SpHb and labHb by 0.56 g dL -1 , which was statistically significant. DNB significantly increased the difference between SpHb and labHb by 0.42 g dL -1 . The effect of DNB on the difference between SpHb and labHb was significant up to three hours after the beginning of surgery (0.58 g dL -1 difference between blocked and non-blocked hands). Conclusion: This study shows that, when hemoglobin levels are low, the accuracy of spectrophotometry decreases. Although DNB increases finger perfusion, it leads to an overestimation of hemoglobin levels by SpHb.

Non-invasive haemoglobin measurement as an index test to detect pre-operative anaemia in elective surgery patients - a prospective study

Non-invasive haemoglobin measurement using absolute values lacks the precision to be the sole basis for the treatment of pre-operative anaemia. However, it can possibly serve as a screening test, indexing 'anaemia' with high sensitivity when values remain under prespecified cut-off values. Based on previous data, non-invasive haemoglobin cut-off values (146 g.l^-1 for women and 152 g.l^-1 for men) detect true anaemia with 99% sensitivity. An index test with these prespecified cut-off values was verified by prospective measurement of non-invasive and invasive haemoglobin pre-operatively in elective surgical patients. In 809 patients, this showed an estimated sensitivity (95%CI) of 98.9% (94.1-99.9%) in women and 96.4% (91.0-99.0%) in men. This saved invasive blood tests in 9% of female and 28% of male patients. In female patients, a lower non-invasive haemoglobin cut-off value (138 g.l^-1 ) would save 28% of invasive blood tests with a sensitivity of 95%. The target 99% sensitivity would be reached by non-invasive haemoglobin cut-off values of 152 g.l^-1 in female and 162 g.l^-1 in male patients, saving 3% and 9% of invasive blood tests, respectively. Bias and limits of agreement between non-invasive and laboratory haemoglobin levels were 2 and - 25 to 28 g.l^-1 , respectively. Patient and measurement characteristics did not influence the agreement between non-invasive and laboratory haemoglobin levels. Although sensitivity was very high, the index test using prespecified cut-off values just failed to reach the target sensitivity to detect true anaemia. Nevertheless, with respect to blood-sparing effects, the use of the index test in men may be clinically useful, while an index test with a lower cut-off (132 g.l^-1 ) could be more clinically appropriate in women.

Clinical implications of using non-invasive haemoglobin monitoring for red blood cell transfusion decision in hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The decision to transfuse red blood cells requires accurate haemoglobin concentration values. In this study, we evaluated if continuous non-invasive haemoglobin (SpHb) measurement could substitute laboratory determined haemoglobin (LabHb) in patients undergoing elective hip replacement. As secondary objective, we analyzed the trend of the difference between techniques.

MATERIALS/METHODS

LabHb measurements were done using an automated analyser and SpHb measurements were acquired using Radical-7®. In randomly selected patients undergoing hip replacement, whenever blood was collected for LabHb, concomitant SpHb was recorded. Correlation, bias and accuracy of SpHb were calculated in comparison with LabHb.

RESULTS

108 paired measurements were obtained from 43 patients. The Pearson R of the correlation between SpHb and LabHb was 0.7 (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman test revealed a bias of 1 ± 1.4 g dL^-1, meaning Lab Hb was recurrently higher than SpHb. Limits of agreement were [-1.7; 3.8]. Considering RBC transfusion threshold of 8 g dL^-1, we found that in two situations transfusion decision would differ based on the measurement considered. Trending ability of SpHb study showed a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative LabHb-SpHb.

DISCUSSION

There was a good correlation between SpHb and LabHb, while bias and limits of agreement were higher than those in literature. There was a limited trending ability of SpHb during the perioperative period. Despite this, using SpHb instead of LabHb for decision making regarding transfusion would only change the decision in 1.9 % of our cases. Our findings suggest that this device could be used as a reference but cannot replace venous puncture as gold standard.

Multicenter comparison of three intraoperative hemoglobin trend monitoring methods

Transfusion decisions are guided by clinical factors and measured hemoglobin (Hb). Time required for blood sampling and analysis may cause Hb measurement to lag clinical conditions, thus continuous intraoperative Hb trend monitoring may provide useful information. This multicenter study was designed to compare three methods of determining intraoperative Hb changes (trend accuracy) to laboratory determined Hb changes. Adult surgical patients with planned arterial catheterization were studied. With each blood gas analysis performed, pulse cooximetry hemoglobin (SpHb) was recorded, and arterial blood Hb was measured by hematology (tHb), arterial blood gas cooximetry (ABGHb), and point of care (aHQHb) analyzers. Hb change was calculated and trend accuracy assessed by modified Bland–Altman analysis. Secondary measures included Hb measurement change direction agreement. Trend accuracy mean bias (95% limits of agreement; g/dl) for SpHb was 0.10 (− 1.14 to 1.35); for ABGHb was − 0.02 (− 1.06 to 1.02); and for aHQHb was 0.003 (− 0.95 to 0.95). Changes more than ± 0.5 g/dl agreed with tHb changes more than ± 0.25 g/dl in 94.2% (88.9–97.0%) SpHb changes, 98.9% (96.1–99.7%) ABGHb changes and 99.0% (96.4–99.7%) aHQHb changes. Sequential changes in SpHb, ABGHb and aHQHb exceeding ± 0.5 g/dl have similar agreement to the direction but not necessarily the magnitude of sequential tHb change. While Hb blood tests should continue to be used to inform transfusion decisions, intraoperative continuous noninvasive SpHb decreases more than − 0.5 g/dl could be a good indicator of the need to measure tHb.

Invasive and non-invasive point-of-care testing and point-of-care monitoring of the hemoglobin concentration in human blood - how accurate are the data?

In this review, scientific investigations of point-of-care testing (POCT) and point-of-care monitoring (POCM) devices are summarized with regard to the measurement accuracy of the hemoglobin concentration. As a common basis, information according to the Bland and Altman principle [bias, limits of agreement (LOA)] as well as the measurement accuracy and precision are considered, so that the comparability can be mapped. These collected data are subdivided according to the manufacturers, devices and procedures (invasive and non-invasive). A total of 31 devices were identified. A comparability of the scientific investigations in particular was given for 23 devices (18 invasive and five non-invasive measuring devices). In terms of measurement accuracy, there is a clear leap between invasive and non-invasive procedures, while no discernible improvement can be derived in the considered time frame from 2010 to 2018. According to the intended use, strict specifications result from the clinical standards, which are insufficiently met by the systems. More stringent requirements can be derived both in the area of blood donation and in the treatment of patients.

Comparison of invasive and noninvasive blood hemoglobin measurement in the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Noninvasive hemoglobin (Hb)-monitoring devices are new inventions in pulse oximeter systems that show hemoglobin levels continuously. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of noninvasive versus standard central laboratory Hb measurements in the operating room. We systematically searched multiple databases. Then, for the quality assessment of studies, we modified QUADAS-2 in the Revman 5.3 software. The GRADE approach was used to measure the quality of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Data were analyzed using the meta-analysis method (random effect model) using STATA 11 software. A total of 28 studies on 2000 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results of mean differences between noninvasive and the central laboratory Hb measurements in overall pooled random effects were - 0.27 (95% LoA (0.44, - 0.10); P value < 0.05). According to this meta-analysis, noninvasive hemoglobin measurement has acceptable accuracy in comparison with the standard invasive method.

Assessment of haemoglobin measurement by several methods - blood gas analyser, capillary and venous HemoCue® , non-invasive spectrophotometry and laboratory assay - in term and preterm infants

A laboratory haematology analyser is the gold standard for measuring haemoglobin concentration but has disadvantages, especially in neonates. This study compared alternative blood-sparing and non-invasive methods of haemoglobin concentration measurement with the gold standard. Haemoglobin concentrations were measured using a laboratory haematology analyser (reference method), blood gas analyser, HemoCue^® using venous and capillary blood samples and a newly developed non-invasive sensor for neonates < 3 kg. A total of 63 measurements were performed. Body weight (2190 (1820-2520 [967-4450]) g) and haemoglobin concentration (12.3 (10.6-15.2 [8.2-20.5]) g.dl^-1 ) varied widely. Bias/limits of agreement between the alternative methods and reference method were -0.1/-1.2 to 1.0 g.dl^-1 (blood gas analyser), -0.4/-1.8 to 1.1 g.dl^-1 (HemoCue, venous blood), 0.7/-1.9 to 3.2 g.dl^-1 (HemoCue, capillary blood) and -1.2/-4.3 to 2 g.dl^-1 (non-invasive haemoglobin measurement). Perfusion index, body weight and fetal haemoglobin concentration did not affect the accuracy of the alternative measurement methods, and these were successfully applied in term and preterm infants. However, the accuracies of non-invasive haemoglobin measurement and HemoCue of capillary blood especially lacked sufficient agreement with that of the reference method to recommend these methods for clinical decision making.

Noninvasive hemoglobin measurement using unmodified smartphone camera and white flash

We show that a mobile phone can measure hemoglobin levels using the built-in RGB camera and white LED without modification. Prior work has demonstrated that a smartphone using the built-in RGB camera with the aid of visible and IR lights can achieve a Pearson correlation results between 0.69-0.82 and an RMSE value between 1.26-1.56 g/dL. Our system builds upon the prior work and demonstrates that with only the built-in white LED, the estimation of hemoglobin level has a Pearson correlation of 0.62 with an RMSE of 1.27 g/dL. This extension work demonstrates that it is feasible to measure hemoglobin without using an IR source.

Anaemia and red blood cell transfusion in intracranial neurosurgery: a comprehensive review

Both anaemia and blood transfusion are associated with poor outcomes in the neurosurgical population. Based on the available literature, the optimal haemoglobin concentration for neurologically injured patients appears to be in the range of 9.0-10.0 g dl^-1, although the individual risks and benefits should be weighed. Several perioperative blood conservation strategies have been used successfully in neurosurgery, including correction of anaemia and coagulopathy, use of antifibrinolytics, and intraoperative cell salvage. Avoidance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and starch-containing solutions is recommended given the potential for platelet dysfunction.

Noninvasive Continuous Hemoglobin Monitoring in Combat Casualties: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the accuracy and precision of noninvasive hemoglobin measurement (SpHb) compared with laboratory or point-of-care Hb, and SpHb ability to trend in seriously injured casualties.

METHODS

Observational study in a convenience sample of combat casualties undergoing resuscitation at two US military trauma hospitals in Afghanistan. SpHb was obtained using the Masimo Rainbow SET (Probe Rev E/Radical-7 Pulse CO-Oximeter v 7.6.2.1). Clinically indicated Hb was analyzed with a Coulter or iStat and compared with simultaneous SpHb values.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were studied (ISS 20 ± 9.8; age 29 ± 9 years; male 97%; 100% intubated). Primary injury cause: improvised explosive device (67%) or gunshot (17%). There were 49 SpHb-Hb pairs (median 2 per subject). Bias: 0.3 ± 1.6 g/dL (95% LOA -2.4, 3.4 g/dL). The SpHb-Hb difference < ± 1 g/dL in 37% of pairs. Eighty-six percent of pairs changed in a similar direction. Using an absolute change in Hb of >1 g/dL, a concurrent absolute change in SpHb of >1 g/dL had a sensitivity: 61%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value: 80%, and a negative predictive value: 69%. The SpHb signal was present in 4643 of 6137 min monitored (76%).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study to describe continuous SpHb in seriously injured combat casualties. Using a threshold of 1 g/dL previously specified in the literature, continuous SpHb is not precise enough to serve as sole transfusion trigger in trauma patients. Further research is needed to determine if it is useful for trending Hb changes or as an early indicator of deterioration in combat casualties.

National and International Guidelines for Patient Blood Management in Obstetrics: A Qualitative Review

In developed countries, rates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) requiring transfusion have been increasing. As a result, anesthesiologists are being increasingly called upon to assist with the management of patients with severe PPH. First responders, including anesthesiologists, may adopt Patient Blood Management (PBM) recommendations of national societies or other agencies. However, it is unclear whether national and international obstetric societies' PPH guidelines account for contemporary PBM practices. We performed a qualitative review of PBM recommendations published by the following national obstetric societies and international groups: the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, United Kingdom; The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada; an interdisciplinary group of experts from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, an international multidisciplinary consensus group, and the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. We also reviewed a PPH bundle, published by The National Partnership for Maternal Safety. On the basis of our review, we identified important differences in national and international societies' recommendations for transfusion and PBM. In the light of PBM advances in the nonobstetric setting, obstetric societies should determine the applicability of these recommendations in the obstetric setting. Partnerships among medical, obstetric, and anesthetic societies may also help standardize transfusion and PBM guidelines in obstetrics.

Evaluation of Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring in Surgical Critical Care Patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical utility of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring based on pulse cooximetry in the ICU setting.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A total of 358 surgical patients from a large urban, academic hospital had the noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring pulse cooximeter placed at admission to the ICU. Core and stat laboratory hemoglobin measurements were taken at the discretion of the clinicians, who were blinded to noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring values.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

There was a poor correlation between the 2,465 time-matched noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring and laboratory hemoglobin measurements (r = 0.29). Bland-Altman analysis showed a positive bias of 1.0 g/dL and limits of agreement of -2.5 to 4.6 g/dL. Accuracy was best at laboratory values of 10.5-14.5 g/dL and least at laboratory values of 6.5-8 g/dL. At hemoglobin values that would ordinarily identify a patient as requiring a transfusion (< 8 g/dL), noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring consistently overestimated the patient's true hemoglobin. When sequential laboratory values declined below 8 g/dL (n = 102) and 7 g/dL (n = 13), the sensitivity and specificity of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring at identifying these events were 27% and 7%, respectively. At a threshold of 8 g/dL, continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring values reached the threshold before the labs in 45 of 102 instances (44%) and at 7 g/dL, noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring did so in three of 13 instances (23%). Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring minus laboratory hemoglobin differences showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.47 within individual patients. Longer length of stay and higher All Patient Refined Diagnostic-Related Groups severity of illness were associated with poor noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring technology holds promise, it is not yet an acceptable substitute for laboratory hemoglobin measurements. Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring performs most poorly in the lower hemoglobin ranges that include commonly used transfusion trigger thresholds and is not consistent within individual patients. Further refinement of the signal acquisition and analysis algorithms and clinical reevaluation are needed.

Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring in critically ill pediatric patients at risk of bleeding

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy and usefulness of noninvasive continuous hemoglobin (Hb) monitoring in critically ill patients at risk of bleeding.

DESIGN

An observational prospective study was made, comparing core laboratory Hb measurement (LabHb) as the gold standard versus transcutaneous hemoglobin monitoring (SpHb).

SETTING

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients weighing >3kg at risk of bleeding.

INTERVENTIONS

SpHb was measured using the Radical7 pulse co-oximeter (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) each time a blood sample was drawn for core laboratory analysis (Siemens ADVIA 2120i).

VARIABLES

Sociodemographic characteristics, perfusion index (PI), pleth variability index, heart rate, SaO₂, rectal temperature, low signal quality and other events that can interfere with measurement.

RESULTS

A total of 284 measurements were made (80 patients). Mean LabHb was 11.7±2.05g/dl. Mean SpHb was 12.32±2g/dl (Pearson 0.72, R² 0.52). The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.69 (95%CI 0.55-0.78)(p<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.07 ±1.46g/dl. A lower PI and higher temperature independently increased the risk of low signal quality (OR 0.531 [95%CI 0.32-0.88] and 0.529 [95%CI 0.33-0.85], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

SpHb shows a good overall correlation to LabHb, though with wide limits of agreement. Its main advantage is continuous monitoring of patients at risk of bleeding. The reliability of the method is limited in cases with poor peripheral perfusion.

Reliability of spot-check transcutaneous hemoglobin measurement in children

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the correlation between spot-check transcutaneous hemoglobin (Hb) and simultaneously measured venous Hb in children.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventeen children weighing 10-30 kg in whom complete blood count had been obtained for any reason were enrolled in this study. Demographic characteristics and vital signs were recorded. Prior to taking blood samples, transcutaneous Hb, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and perfusion index were measured using a probe connected to the subject's thumb. To determine the reliability of the transcutaneous measurement versus venous blood measurement performed via an autoanalyzer device, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The correlation between the two measurements was evaluated on Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 59.4% of the patients were boys. The average age was 53 months (range, 6-132 months). Average bodyweight was 16 kg (range, 10-25 kg). Mean venous Hb, hematocrit, and transcutaneous Hb were 11.94 ± 1.15 g/dL, 35.8 ± 3.2%, and 12.42 ± 1.24 g/dL, respectively. The ICC for the reliability of the transcutaneous measurements versus venous blood measurements was r = 0.67 (95%CI: 0.5776-0.7526). The correlation between the two sets of measurements was good, as evaluated by the Bland-Altman analysis.

CONCLUSION

There is good correlation between transcutaneous and venous blood measurements of Hb. In the future, transcutaneous measurement, as a non-invasive method, may be an alternative for the measurement of Hb in childhood.

Noninvasively Measured Hemoglobin Concentration Reflects Arterial Hemoglobin Concentration Before but Not After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery or Valve Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study compared noninvasively measured hemoglobin and arterial hemoglobin before and after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery or valve surgery.

DESIGN

Observational study with retrospective data analysis.

SETTING

Veterans Affairs hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-five men.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Hemoglobin values were measured noninvasively by co-oximetry to corresponding arterial hemoglobin concentrations taken at clinically relevant time points chosen at the discretion of the cardiac anesthesiologist. Thirty-five and 27 pooled pairs of data were obtained before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, respectively. Arterial hemoglobin concentration was analyzed using i-STAT CG8+test cartridges routinely used in the authors' operating rooms and those of other institutions. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis revealed a significant positive bias, wide limits of agreement, and low correlation coefficients between the noninvasive and arterial hemoglobin measurements. These findings were especially notable after compared with before cardiopulmonary bypass.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin overestimates arterial hemoglobin by almost 1 g/dL when compared to iSTAT. A lack of precision also was observed with noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin, especially after cardiopulmonary bypass. These findings supported the contention that sole reliance on noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin for transfusion decisions in cardiac surgery patients may be inappropriate.

Continuous Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring: A Measured Response to a Critical Review

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Published ahead of print March 5, 2015

Validity of non-invasive point-of-care hemoglobin estimation in healthy and sick children-a method comparison study

This study was conducted at a tertiary care center in northern India to evaluate the validity of non-invasive transcutaneous hemoglobin estimation in healthy and sick children in comparison to hemoglobin estimation by traditional lab method. A method comparison study was conducted including 150 subjects. Enrolled patients included 80 neonates with average age of 3.9 ± 2.1 days, and 70 children with average age of 5.8 ± 2 years. Each population (newborn and children) comprised of almost equal numbers of healthy and critically ill patients with shock. Hemoglobin (Hb) was estimated on enrolment by transcutaneous spectrophotometry (SpHb) and traditional automated lab analyzer (Hb-Lab). Difference between Hb levels by the two methods (called bias) was measured and analyzed using Bland-Altman method. Out of 148 data pairs analyzed, bias between SpHb and Hb-Lab was -1.52 ± 1.91 g/dl (mean ± SD). SpHb showed excellent positive correlation with Hb-Lab (r = 0.94 (p < 0.001)) and good visual agreement on Bland-Altman plots. Bias was higher in sick subjects with shock as compared to healthy ones in both neonatal and pediatric population (-2.31 ± 2.21 g/dl versus -0.77 ± 1.2 g/dl, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

SpHb showed good accuracy and correlated well with lab estimated Hb levels in healthy children. However, in children with impaired peripheral perfusion, its diagnostic accuracy was inadequate to justify routine use for quantification of severity of anemia and making transfusion decisions solely on non-invasive estimation of hemoglobin.

WHAT IS KNOWN

Non-invasive hemoglobin estimation is a relatively new and novel method which has given mixed results regarding its potential efficacy in adults. There is limited data regarding usefulness and accuracy of non-invasive Hb estimation by SpHb in sick neonates and children.

WHAT IS NEW

Non-invasive Hb estimation by SpHb monitor is reasonably accurate in healthy neonates and children. It can be used in critically ill children and neonates, but in conjunction with lab confirmation of Hb values.

Comparison of the gold standard of hemoglobin measurement with the clinical standard (BGA) and noninvasive hemoglobin measurement (SpHb) in small children: a prospective diagnostic observational study

INTRODUCTION

Collecting a blood sample is usually necessary to measure hemoglobin levels in children. Especially in small children, noninvasively measuring the hemoglobin level could be extraordinarily helpful, but its precision and accuracy in the clinical environment remain unclear. In this study, noninvasive hemoglobin measurement and blood gas analysis were compared to hemoglobin measurement in a clinical laboratory.

METHODS

In 60 healthy preoperative children (0.2-7.6 years old), hemoglobin was measured using a noninvasive method (SpHb; Radical-7 Pulse Co-Oximeter), a blood gas analyzer (clinical standard, BGAHb; ABL 800 Flex), and a laboratory hematology analyzer (reference method, labHb; Siemens Advia). Agreement between the results was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and by determining the percentage of outliers.

RESULTS

Sixty SpHb measurements, 60 labHb measurements, and 59 BGAHb measurements were evaluated. In 38% of the children, the location of the SpHb sensor had to be changed more than twice for the signal quality to be sufficient. The bias/limits of agreement between SpHb and labHb were -0.65/-3.4 to 2.1 g·dl(-1) . Forty-four percent of the SpHb values differed from the reference value by more than 1 g·dl(-1) . Age, difficulty of measurement, and the perfusion index (PI) had no influence on the accuracy of SpHb. The bias/limits of agreement between BGAHb and labHb were 1.14/-1.6 to 3.9 g·dl(-1) . Furthermore, 66% of the BGAHb values differed from the reference values by more than 1 g·dl(-1) . The absolute mean difference between SpHb and labHb (1.1 g·dl(-1) ) was smaller than the absolute mean difference between BGAHb and labHb (1.5 g·dl(-1) /P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin agrees more with the reference method than the measurement of hemoglobin using a blood gas analyzer. However, both methods can show clinically relevant differences from the reference method (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01693016).

Validation of noninvasive hemoglobin measurement by pulse co-oximeter in newborn infants

OBJECTIVE

To describe the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin (Hb) obtained with pulse co-oximeter (SpHb) compared with total Hb (tHb) from laboratory co-oximeter in neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

Neonates with birth weight (BW) <3000 g admitted to LAC+USC Medical Center neonatal intensive care unit were included. SpHb was recorded using Masimo Radical-7 and compared with tHb. A total of three data sets were obtained for each patient. Regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis were performed.

RESULT

Sixty-one patients (mean±s.d., BW 1177±610 g and gestational age 28.7±3.9 weeks) were enrolled. The mean tHb value was 13.9±2.0 g dl(-1) and the mean SpHb was 14.0±2.0 g dl(-1). There was a moderately positive correlation between SpHb and tHb (r=0.66, P<0.001) with a bias and precision of -0.09±1.67 g dl(-1). Data from a subgroup of infants with gestational age ⩽32 weeks (52/61 patients) were analyzed, and the correlation coefficient was moderately positive (r=0.69, P<0.001) with a bias and precision of -0.23±1.60 g dl(-1).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that noninvasive SpHb may be considered as an adjunct to invasive tHb measurements in newborn infants <3000 g especially in preterm infants ⩽32 weeks of gestation.

A noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in the pediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Critically ill pediatric patients frequently require hemoglobin monitoring. Accurate noninvasive Hb (SpHb) would allow practitioners to decrease anemia from repeated blood draws, traumatic blood draws, and a decreased number of laboratory Hb (LabHb) medical tests. The Food and Drug Administration has approved the Masimo Pronto SpHb and associated Rainbow probes; however, its use in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is controversial. In this study, we define the degree of agreement between LabHb and SpHb using the Masimo Pronto SpHb Monitor and identify clinical and demographic conditions associated with decreased accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational study in a large PICU at an academic medical center. Fifty-three pediatric patients (30-d and 18-y-old), weighing >3 kg, admitted to the PICU from January-April 2013 were examined. SpHb levels measured at the time of LabHb blood draw were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Only 83 SpHb readings were obtained in 118 attempts (70.3%) and 35 readings provided a result of "unable to obtain." The mean LabHb and SpHb were 11.1 g/dL and 11.2 g/dL, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.07 g/dL with a standard deviation of ±2.59 g/dL. Pearson correlation is 0.55, with a 95% confidence interval between 0.38 and 0.68. Logistic regression showed that extreme LabHb values, increasing skin pigmentation, and increasing body mass index were predictors of poor agreement between SpHb and LabHb (P < 0.05). Separately, increasing body mass index, hypoxia, and hypothermia were predictors for undetectable readings (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Masimo Pronto SpHb Monitor provides adequate agreement for the trending of hemoglobin levels in critically ill pediatric patients. However, the degree of agreement is insufficient to be used as the sole indicator for transfusion decisions and should be used in context of other clinical parameters to determine the need for LabHb in critically ill pediatric patients.