When All Else Fails: Novel Use of Angiotensin II for Vasodilatory Shock: A Case Report

The Efficacy and Safety of Angiotensin II for Treatment of Vasoplegia in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To summarize evidence regarding intravenous angiotensin II administration in critical illness and provide an updated understanding of its effects on various organ dysfunction and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) biomarkers.

DESIGN

A systematic review.

SETTING

A search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to May 3, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized trials, quasi-randomized trials, observational studies, case reports, and case series were included. Comparative studies (RCTs and observational studies with comparator) were used for the main analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Critically ill adults and children.

INTERVENTIONS

Intravenous angiotensin II administration.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies with a total of 2,918 participants (5 RCTs, 15 observational studies, and 39 case reports or case series) were analyzed. Septic shock and cardiac surgery were the most common clinical conditions (14 studies for each). In 14 comparative studies (5 RCTs and 9 observational studies), mortality was not different from that in controls, except in 1 observational study. Several studies reported decreased renal replacement therapy use, improved oxygenation and blood pressure response, and decreased rate of myocardial injury with angiotensin II therapy. There was no increase in thrombotic events or adverse events. Angiotensin II therapy reduced renin and angiotensin I levels without affecting other RAS biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous angiotensin II has been reported in almost 3000 critically ill patients with diverse types of shock. Despite unclear mortality impacts, angiotensin II seems to confer beneficial effects on several organ systems and RAS derangements, without increasing adverse events.

Angiotensin II as a Vasopressor for Perioperative Hypotension in Solid Organ Transplant

During the perioperative period of transplantation, patients experience hypotension secondary to the side effects of anesthesia, surgical stress, inflammatory triggering, and intraoperative fluid shifts, among others causes. Vasopressor support, in this context, must reverse systemic hypotension, but ideally, the agents used should benefit allograft function and avoid the adverse events commonly seen after transplantation. Traditional therapies to reverse hypotension include catecholamine vasopressors (norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, and phenylephrine), but their utility is limited when considering allograft complications and adverse events such as arrhythmias with agents with beta-adrenergic properties. Synthetic angiotensin II (AT2S-[Giapreza]) is a novel vasopressor indicated for distributive shock with a unique mechanism of action as an angiotensin receptor agonist restoring balance to an often-disrupted renin angiotensin aldosterone system. Additionally, AT2S provides a balanced afferent and efferent arteriole vasoconstriction at the level of the kidney and could avoid the arrhythmic complications of a beta-adrenergic agonist. While the data, to date, are limited, AT2S has demonstrated safety in case reports, pilot studies, and small series in the kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplant populations. There are physiologic and hemodynamic reasons why AT2S could be a more utilized agent in these populations, but further investigation is warranted.

Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Refractory Shock: A Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine if angiotensin II is associated with improved outcomes as measured by 30- and 90-day mortality as well as other secondary outcomes such as organ dysfunction and adverse events.

DESIGN

Retrospective, matched analysis of patients receiving angiotensin II compared with both historical and concurrent controls receiving equivalent doses of nonangiotensin II vasopressors.

SETTING

Multiple ICUs in a large, university-based hospital.

PATIENTS

Eight hundred thirteen adult patients with shock admitted to an ICU and requiring vasopressor support.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Angiotensin II use had no association with the primary outcome of 30-day mortality (60% vs 56%; p = 0.292). The secondary outcome of 90-day mortality was also similar (65% vs 63%; p = 0.440) as were changes in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores over a 5-day monitoring period after enrollment. Angiotensin II was not associated with increased rates of kidney replacement therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 0.88-2.19; p = 0.158) or receipt of mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.41-5.51; p = 0.539) after enrollment, and the rate of thrombotic events was similar between angiotensin II and control patients (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.71-1.48; p = 0.912).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe shock, angiotensin II was not associated with improved mortality or organ dysfunction and was not associated with an increased rate of adverse events.

Effects of angiotensin II in the management of perioperative hypotension in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Due to the mechanisms of action of conventional catecholamine vasopressors, there is increased risk of renal allograft injury and adverse events in transplant recipients with fluid-refractory distributive shock during the perioperative period. As such, mechanistically alternative vasopressors like angiotensin II (ATII) may avoid these complications, but there is an absence of data supporting use in this population.

METHODS

This was a single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase 4 study conducted as a 1-year pilot of 20 adult renal transplant recipients receiving ATII as their first continuous infusion vasopressor in the perioperative period. The study aim was to systematically assess the safety and hemodynamic effects of ATII. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of adverse events. Hemodynamic effect was assessed by the achievement of per protocol hemodynamic goals (i.e., SBP ≥120 mmHg) and the need for adjunct vasopressors.

RESULTS

Most cases involved deceased donors (70%), with a corresponding mean (SD) cold ischemia time of 14.7 (8.6) h. Over a surgery duration of 5.3 (1.2) h, subjects received 3.2 (2.0) L of total volume resuscitation prior to ATII initiation. No adverse events were directly related to ATII administration. Throughout this period, ATII was utilized for a median of 1.0 (IQR, 1.5) h intraoperatively (N = 7), 26.5 (IQR, 84.8) h postoperatively (N = 4), and 63.8 (IQR, 57.8) h in subjects who required ATII both intra- and postoperatively (N = 9). Only one of the 20 patients needed adjunct continuous infusion vasopressors in addition to ATII.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the observations of this pilot study, ATII is a safe and effective vasopressor option for renal transplant recipients requiring perioperative hypotension reversal.

The pharmacotherapeutic options in patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock

INTRODUCTION

Septic and vasoplegic shock are common types of vasodilatory shock (VS) with high mortality. After fluid resuscitation and the use of catecholamine-mediated vasopressors (CMV), vasopressin, angiotensin II, methylene blue (MB) and hydroxocobalamin can be added to maintain blood pressure.

AREAS COVERED

VS treatment utilizes a phased approach with secondary vasopressors added to vasopressor agents to maintain an acceptable mean arterial pressure (MAP). This review covers additional vasopressors and adjunctive therapies used when fluid and catecholamine-mediated vasopressors fail to maintain target MAP.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence supporting additional vasopressor agents in catecholamine resistant VS is limited to case reports, series, and a few randomized control trials (RCTs) to guide recommendations. Vasopressin is the most common agent added next when MAPs are not adequately supported with CMV. VS patients failing fluids and vasopressors with cardiomyopathy may have cardiotonic agents such as dobutamine or milrinone added before or after vasopressin. Angiotensin II, another class of vasopressor is used in VS to maintain adequate MAP. MB and/or hydoxocobalamin, vitamin C, thiamine and corticosteroids are adjunctive therapies used in refractory VS. More RCTs are needed to confirm the utility of these drugs, at what doses, which combinations and in what order they should be given.

A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study of Angiotensin II in Shock

INTRODUCTION

Angiotensin II (Ang-2) is a non-catecholamine vasopressor that targets the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by agonism of the angiotensin type 1 receptor. Its utility as a vasopressor and a catecholamine-sparing agent was demonstrated in the pivotal ATHOS-3 trial, and numerous post-hoc analyses have shown reduced mortality in certain subsets of the population.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients at 5 centers who received Ang-2 from 2017-2020 were included in this multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study. Patient demographics, hemodynamics, and adverse events were collected. The primary outcomes of the study were the mean difference in MAP and norepinephrine (NEpi)-equivalent dose at hours 0 and 3 following initiation of Ang-2 therapy.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in this study. The primary outcomes of an increase in MAP (mean difference 9.3 mmHg, 95% CI 6.4-12.1, p < 0.001) and a reduction in NEpi equivalent dose (mean difference 0.16 µg/kg/min, 95% CI 0.10-0.22, p < 0.001) between hours 0 and 3 were statistically significant. The median time to reach a MAP ≥65 was 16 minutes (IQR 5-60 min). After stratifying patients by the NED dose and number of vasopressors administered prior to the initiation of Ang-2, those with a NED dose < 0.2 µg/kg/min, NED dose < 0.3 µg/kg/min, or those on ≤ 3 vasopressors had a significantly greater reduction in NED by hour 3 than those patients above these thresholds.

CONCLUSION

Ang-2 is an effective vasopressor and reduces catecholamine dose significantly. Its effect is rapid, with target MAP obtained within 30 minutes in most patients. Given the critical importance of adequate blood pressure to organ perfusion, Ang-2 should be considered when target MAP cannot be achieved with conventional vasopressors. Ang-2 should be utilized early in the course of shock, before the NED dose exceeds 0.2-0.3 µg/kg/min and before the initiation of the fourth-line vasopressor.

Effects of a single bolus of hydroxocobalamin on hemodynamics in vasodilatory shock

PURPOSE

Hydroxocobalamin has been observed to cause transient hypertension in healthy subjects, but rigorous studies examining its efficacy are lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults in shock who received hydroxocobalamin from 2017 to 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Hourly hemodynamics from 24 h before and after treatment were collected, and the difference and hourly change of mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and norepinephrine-equivalent dose (NED) were examined in mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

This study included 3992 hemodynamic data points from 35 patients and is the largest case series to date. In the mixed effects model, there was no difference in MAP 24-h after hydroxocobalamin administration (estimated fixed effect [EFE] -0.2 mmHg, p = 0.89). A two-piecewise mixed model found that the hourly change in MAP was not different from zero in either the pre-administration (EFE 0.0 mmHg/h, p = 0.80) or post-administration segments (EFE 0.0 mmHg/h, p = 0.55). Analysis of the SBP, DBP, and NED also found similar insignificant results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hydroxocobalamin has been observed to cause hypertension in healthy subjects, our results suggest that in patients with shock, hydroxocobalamin may not be effective in improving hemodynamics at 24 h after administration.

Renin Kinetics Are Superior to Lactate Kinetics for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Hypotensive Critically Ill Patients

OBJECTIVES

Whole blood lactate concentration is widely used in shock states to assess perfusion. We aimed to determine if the change in plasma renin concentration over time would be superior to the change in lactate concentration for predicting in-hospital mortality in hypotensive patients on vasopressors.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic ICU.

PATIENTS

Adult patients on vasopressors for greater than 6 hours to maintain a mean arterial pressure greater than or equal to 65 mm Hg during January 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Plasma renin concentrations were measured at enrollment and at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Whole blood lactate measurements were performed according to normal standard of care. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate whether the change in renin or lactate concentration could predict in-hospital mortality. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the association between renin and lactate concentration and in-hospital mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was performed to measure the discriminative ability of initial and peak renin and lactate concentration to predict mortality. The association between renin and lactate concentration above the upper limit of normal at each timepoint with in-hospital mortality was also examined.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The study included 197 renin and 148 lactate samples obtained from 53 patients. The slope of the natural log (ln) of renin concentration was independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 10.35; 95% CI, 1.40-76.34; p = 0.022), but the slope of ln-lactate concentration was not (adjusted odds ratio, 4.78; 95% CI, 0.03-772.64; p = 0.55). The generalized estimating equation models found that both ln-renin (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.37; p = 0.025) and ln-lactate (adjusted odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.05-5.37; p = 0.037) were associated with mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated that initial renin could predict in-hospital mortality with fair discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.682; 95% CI, 0.503-0.836; p = 0.05), but initial lactate could not (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.615; 95% CI, 0.413-0.803; p = 0.27). Peak renin (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.728; 95% CI, 0.547-0.888; p = 0.01) and peak lactate (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.746; 95% CI, 0.584-0.876; p = 0.01) demonstrated moderate discrimination. There was no significant difference in discriminative ability between initial or peak renin and lactate concentration. At each study time point, a higher proportion of renin values exceeded the threshold of normal (40 pg/mL) in nonsurvivors than in survivors, but this association was not significant for lactate.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no significant difference in the performance of renin and lactate when examining the absolute values of each laboratory, a positive rate of change in renin concentration, but not lactate concentration, over 72 hours was associated with in-hospital mortality. For each one-unit increase in the slope of ln-renin, the odds of mortality increased 10-fold. Renin levels greater than 40 pg/mL, but not lactate levels greater than 2 mmol/L, were associated with in-hospital mortality. These findings suggest that plasma renin kinetics may be superior to lactate kinetics in predicting mortality of hypotensive, critically ill patients.

A Patient With Tricyclic Antidepressant Overdose With Catecholamine-Resistant Hypotension Rescued With Angiotensin II: A Case Report

This case report explores the novel use of angiotensin II (Giapreza) for the treatment of vasodilation in the setting of a tricyclic overdose. The purpose of this case is to describe how the use of angiotensin II can improve hemodynamic parameters and result in a dose reduction of other catecholamine vasopressors in vasodilatory shock. The use of angiotensin II is new to clinical practice and has the potential to change outcomes for patients.

Angiotensin II Infusion for Shock: A Multicenter Study of Postmarketing Use

BACKGROUND

Vasodilatory shock refractory to catecholamine vasopressors and arginine vasopressin is highly morbid and responsible for significant mortality. Synthetic angiotensin II is a potent vasoconstrictor that may be suitable for use in these patients.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the safety and effectiveness of angiotensin II and what variables are associated with a favorable hemodynamic response?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a multicenter, retrospective study at five tertiary medical centers in the United States. The primary end point of hemodynamic responsiveness to angiotensin II was defined as attainment of mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥ 65 mm Hg with a stable or reduced total vasopressor dosage 3 h after drug initiation.

RESULTS

Of 270 included patients, 181 (67%) demonstrated hemodynamic responsiveness to angiotensin II. Responders showed a greater increase in MAP (+10.3 mm Hg vs +1.6 mm Hg, P < .001) and reduction in vasopressor dosage (-0.20 μg/kg/min vs +0.04 μg/kg/min; P < .001) compared with nonresponders at 3 h. Variables associated with favorable hemodynamic response included lower lactate concentration (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.17, P < .001) and receipt of vasopressin (OR, 6.05; 95% CI, 1.98-18.6; P = .002). In severity-adjusted multivariate analysis, hemodynamic responsiveness to angiotensin II was associated with reduced likelihood of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.71; P < .001). Arrhythmias occurred in 28 patients (10%) and VTE was identified in 4 patients.

INTERPRETATION

In postmarketing use for vasopressor-refractory shock, 67% of angiotensin II recipients demonstrated a favorable hemodynamic response. Patients with lower lactate concentrations and those receiving vasopressin were more likely to respond to angiotensin II. Patients who responded to angiotensin II experienced reduced mortality.

Another Role for Angiotensin II?: Vasopressin-Refractory Shock After Pheochromocytoma Resection: A Case Report

A patient presented with multiple unrelated tumors and was found to have a small but functional adrenal pheochromocytoma. After pheochromocytoma resection, shock developed unresponsive to vasopressin in recommended doses (0.04 U/min infusion plus repeated 1-U boluses) but responded dramatically to an angiotensin II infusion (20 ng/kg/min) with a mean arterial pressure >100 mm Hg. The patient's blood pressure was maintained for 42 hours postoperatively with an infusion rate that ranged from 2 to 38 ng/kg/min. Because vasopressin may not always be effective for postresection shock in people with pheochromocytomas, angiotensin II may prove to be an effective alternative.

Angiotensin II for the treatment of septic shock in a neutropenic patient with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Mortality remains high in septic shock with few new treatment options. Angiotensin II has been recently approved for use in septic shock due to promising results in the ATHOS-3 trial. However, patients with neutropenia were excluded in the trial. This patient population is becoming increasingly common in the intensive care unit as there is an increase in novel biologic therapies and stem cell transplantations for haematological and solid organ malignancies. We present a case of a patient with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who received chemotherapy, resulting in neutropenia and septic shock. There was persistent hypotension despite initiating multiple conventional vasopressors. Angiotensin II was attempted with immediate improvement in the blood pressure which resulted in weaning of other vasopressors. This positive haemodynamic response suggests that angiotensin II can successfully be used in neutropenic patients without increasing the overall catecholamine burden of septic shock.

Roles of angiotensin II as vasopressor in vasodilatory shock

Shock is an acute condition of circulatory failure resulting in life-threatening organ dysfunction, high morbidity and high mortality. Current management includes fluid and catecholamine therapy to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure and organ perfusion. Norepinephrine is recommended as first-line vasopressor, but other agents are available. Angiotensin II is an alternative potent vasoconstrictor without chronotropic or inotropic properties. Several studies, including a large randomized controlled trial have demonstrated its ability to increase blood pressure with catecholamine-sparing effects. Angiotensin II was consequently approved by the US FDA in 2017 and the EU in 2019 as an add-on vasopressor in vasodilatory shock. This review aims to discuss its basic pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety and future perspectives.

Role of angiotensin II in treatment of refractory distributive shock

OBJECTIVE

Clinical data and gaps in knowledge regarding angiotensin II (AT2), which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in December 2017 via priority review for treatment of septic and other vasodilatory shock, is discussed.

SUMMARY

AT2 is an endogenous peptide that raises blood pressure via vasoconstriction and increased aldosterone release. It was previously available but withdrawn from the US market; previous low-quality research describes increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP). The recent approval of AT2 was based on data from a Phase III randomized trial comparing i.v. AT2 (n = 163) with placebo use (n = 158) in patients with vasodilatory shock receiving high doses of other vasopressors. AT2 significantly increased achievement of the primary endpoint, MAP response at 3 hours after the start of infusion, relative to placebo use (69.9% [n = 114] versus 23.4% [n = 37], p < 0.0001). Serious adverse events occurred in 60.7% (n = 99) and 67.1% (n = 106) of patients treated with AT2 and placebo recipients, respectively, including venous and arterial thromboembolic events (12.9% [n = 21] and 5.1% [n = 8], respectively). No significant effects of AT2 on 7- or 28-day mortality were seen among all patients in the ATHOS-3 trial. However, post hoc analyses suggested that AT2 may reduce mortality in patients with low baseline AT2 levels, exaggerated response to AT2, and acute kidney injury receiving concomitant renal replacement therapy. Overall, due to shortcomings of the ATHOS-3 trial data and the absence of confirmatory studies, the optimal place in therapy of AT2 for vasodilatory shock cannot be determined with confidence.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous AT2 represents a novel treatment strategy for refractory septic or other vasodilatory shock, although findings of safety and efficacy have not been replicated and the drug's optimal place in therapy is uncertain.

Angiotensin II: A New Vasopressor for the Treatment of Distributive Shock

PURPOSE

Angiotensin II (ATII) is a potent endogenous vasoconstrictor that has recently garnered regulatory approval for the treatment of distributive shock, including septic shock. Traditional vasoactive substances used in the management of distributive shock include norepinephrine, epinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin. However, their use can be associated with deleterious adverse drug effects, such as splanchnic vasoconstriction and associated hypoperfusion. The purpose of this review is to describe ATII, including its pharmacologic mechanisms, pharmacokinetic profile, evidence of efficacy and tolerability, and potential role in contemporary critical care practice.

METHODS

Peer-reviewed clinical trials and relevant treatment guidelines published from 1966 to September 14, 2019, were identified from Medline/PubMed using the following search terms: angiotensin II OR angiotensin 2 AND shock OR septic shock OR vasodilatory shock. Pertinent review articles were reviewed for additional studies for inclusion and discussion. The final decision on the inclusion of studies in the current review was based on the expert opinion of the authors.

FINDINGS

On the basis of the available evidence, ATII is effective at elevating blood pressure in patients with distributive shock and appears to reduce the dose of concurrent vasopressors to maintain adequate blood pressure. ATII has been investigated for other causes of shock; however, robust evidence of off-label indications is lacking and is much needed. Clinical and cost benefits compared with traditional vasopressors have yet to be established.

IMPLICATIONS

ATII represents a welcome addition to the armamentarium of critical care clinicians. Enthusiasm for the use of ATII should be balanced with the current gaps in our understanding of ATII in patients with shock. Until further evidence provides more clinically meaningful benefits, as well as cost-effectiveness compared with currently available vasopressors, critical care clinicians should reserve ATII for salvage therapy in patients with septic shock.

Angiotensin II in Decompensated Cirrhosis Complicated by Septic Shock

This case describes the first reported use of human-derived synthetic angiotensin II (Ang-2) in a patient with decompensated cirrhosis and septic shock. The patient presented in vasodilatory shock from Enterobacter cloacae bacteremia with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score of 14 and a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 36. This case is significant because liver failure was an exclusion criterion in the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock (ATHOS-3) trial, but the liver produces angiotensinogen, which is key precursor to Ang-2 in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Resuscitation with Ang-2 is a potentially beneficial medication when conventional vasopressors have failed to control mean arterial pressure in this population.

Angiotensin II in Vasodilatory Shock

The Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock (ATHOS-3) trial demonstrated the vasopressor effects and catecholamine-sparing properties of angiotensin II. As a result, the Food and Drug Administration has approved angiotensin II for the treatment of vasodilatory shock. This review details the goals of treatment of vasodilatory shock in addition to the history, current use, and recent research regarding the use of angiotensin II. An illustrative case of the use of angiotensin II is also incorporated for understanding the clinical utility of the drug.

Angiotensin II Use in Refractory Multisystem Shock: A Case Report

Distributive (vasodilatory) shock is common in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Treating distributive shock presents a challenge, especially if a patient is tachyphylactic to commonly used vasopressors. This case report illustrates the use of a newly approved vasopressor in a patient with vasodilatory shock resulting from a motor vehicle injury. A 56-year-old man was brought to our emergency department (ED) hemodynamically unstable requiring aggressive resuscitation. The results of his evaluation were consistent with multisystem trauma for which he required intubation on arrival, and he received multiple units of blood and blood product via transfusion. The patient’s condition declined despite receiving multiple vasopressors in the ICU. A few days after admission, the patient developed ischemic bowel requiring surgical resection. While his chance of survival was believed to be dismal, the use of angiotensin II (ATII) as a last resort proved to be helpful.