Experience in the management of odontoid process injuries: an analysis of 128 cases

Development of a Predictive Model for Persistent Instability Following Conservative Management of Type II Odontoid Fractures

BACKGROUND

Odontoid fractures are common cervical spine fractures; however, significant controversy exists regarding their treatment. Risk factors for failure of conservative therapy have been identified, although no predictive risk score has been developed to aid in decision-making.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients evaluated at a level 1 trauma center. Patients identified with type II odontoid fractures as classified by the D'Alonzo Classification system who were treated with external orthosis were included in analysis. Patients were considered to have failed conservative therapy if they were offered surgical intervention. A machine learning method (Risk-SLIM) was then utilized to create a risk stratification score based on risk factors to identify patients at high risk for requiring surgical intervention due to persistent instability.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were identified as presenting with type II odontoid fractures that were treated conservatively; 38 patients were offered surgery for persistent instability. The Odontoid Fracture Predictive Model (OFPM) was created using a machine learning algorithm with a 5-fold cross validation area under the curve of 0.7389 (95% CI: 0.671 to 0.808). Predictive factors were found to include fracture displacement, displacement greater than 5 mm, comminution at the fracture base, and history of smoking. The probability of persistent instability was <5% with a score of 0 and 88% with a score of 5.

CONCLUSIONS

The OFPM model is a unique, quick, and accurate tool to assist in clinical decision-making in patients with type II odontoid fractures. External validation is necessary to evaluate the validity of these findings.

Preoperative cervical traction with Gardner-Wells tongs: who profits most?

BACKGROUND

Preoperative traction with the Gardner-Wells tongs (PTGWT) is a valuable option for cervical spine injuries with malalignment. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors related to the treatment success of PTGWT.

METHODS

All consecutive cases with PTGWT due to cervical spine injury with malalignment treated between 01/2010 and 09/2020 were included. Patients' records were reviewed for demographic and clinical characteristics. Treatment success was evaluated upon the angle correction in the sagittal plane using the computed tomography scans before and after the treatment.

RESULTS

Of 20 patients in the final analysis (median age: 77.5 years; 12 females [60%]), 14 individuals were treated for the type-II odontoid fracture, and six cases presented with subluxation fractures between C3 and C7. After PTGWT and subsequent intraoperative reposition, there was an improvement of the median deviation angle from initial 32° to 5.5°. PTGWT resulted in a significant improvement of the median deviation angle for the odontoid (17°, P<0.0001), but not for the subluxation (4°, P=0.10) fractures. The time interval between trauma and PTGWT was associated with the treatment success of subluxation (P=0.051) but not of odontoid (P=0.87) fractures. Older individuals aged ≥51 years showed better reposition results with PTGWT (17° vs. 7.5°, P=0.02). There were no PTGWT-related complications in the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

PTGWT is an effective and safe treatment for cervical spine injuries with malalignment. The patients with odontoid fractures might particularly profit from the PTGWT. Treatment delay seems more relevant for PTGWT success in subluxation than in odontoid fractures.

Mortality in ASIA Impairment Scale grade A to D Patients With Odontoid Fracture and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence of Spinal Cord Injury

Odontoid fractures are common, often presenting in the elderly after a fall and infrequently associated with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). The goal of this study was to analyze predictors of mortality and neurological outcome when odontoid fractures were associated with signal change on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at admission. Over an 18-year period (2001-2019), 33 patients with odontoid fractures and documented tSCI on MRI were identified. Mean age was 65.3 years (standard deviation [SD] = 17.2), and 21 patients were male. The mechanism of injury was falls in 25 patients, motor vehicle accidents in 5, and other causes in 3. Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 40.5 (SD = 30.2), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 13 (SD = 3.4), and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score (AMS) was 51.6 (SD = 42.7). ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade was A, B, C, and D in 9, 2, 3, and 19 patients, respectively. Mean intramedullary lesion length was 32.3 mm (SD = 18.6). The odontoid peg was displaced ventral or dorsal in 15 patients. Twenty patients had surgical intervention: anterior odontoid screw fixation in 7 and posterior spinal fusion in 13. Eleven (33.3%) patients died in this series: withdrawal of medical care in 5; anoxic brain injury in 4; and failure of critical care management in 2. Univariate logistic regression indicated that GCS score (p < 0.014), AMS (p < 0.002), AIS grade (p < 0.002), and ISS (p < 0.009) were risk factors for mortality. Multi-variate regression analysis indicated that only AMS (p < 0.002) had a significant relationship with mortality when odontoid fracture was associated with tSCI (odds ratio, 0.963; 95% confidence interval, 0.941-0.986).

Odontoid fracture complicating ankylosing spondylitis presenting with cervical canal stenosis and quadriparesis: A case report with 5-year follow-up and review of the literature

Introduction and importance

Spinal fractures, especially cervical fractures, are more common in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in comparison with unaffected patients. However, odontoid fractures are relatively rare in these patients. Also, neurological symptoms are not common in odontoid fractures due to the larger diameter of the spinal canal at this level.

Case presentation

Here, we presented a 41 year-old man known case of ankylosing spondylitis who develop odontoid fracture and severe cervical stenosis after falling trauma. Quadriparesis and positive Hoffman sign as well as significant thoracolumbar kyphosis were diagnosed in further investigation. Laminectomy and posterior fixation were executed primary and pedicular subtraction osteotomy was performed two years later to manage the kyphosis and sagittal imbalance. On the follow-up period of five years the patient was fully functional.

Clinical discussion

There are a few cases of odontoid fractures complicating ankylosing spondylitis in the literature. Neurological symptoms are relatively uncommon in odontoid fractures; however, cases with AS can present with neck pain, weakness, and hyperreflexia when having unstable fractures.

Conclusion

Although there is not any gold standard for the treatment of the odontoid fracture in AS, surgical intervention is preferred.

•

The occurrence of the odontoid fracture is rare in patients with AS.

•

Neurological deficits are more common in posterior subluxation of the odontoid process compared to anterior subluxation.

•

The optimal treatment approach for odontoid fracture in cases with AS is unknown; however, surgical management is preferred.

Institutional review of the management of type II odontoid fractures: associations and outcomes with fibrous union

OBJECTIVE

Type II odontoid fractures may be managed operatively or nonoperatively. If managed with bracing, bony union may never occur despite stability. This phenomenon is termed fibrous union. The authors aimed to determine associations with stable fibrous union and compare the morbidity of patients managed operatively and nonoperatively.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of their spine trauma database for adults with type II odontoid fractures between 2015 and 2019. Two-sample t-tests and Fisher's exact tests identified associations with follow-up stability and were used to compare operative and nonoperative outcomes. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to validate initial stable upright cervical radiographs related to follow-up stability.

RESULTS

Among 88 patients, 10% received upfront surgical fixation, and 90% were managed nonoperatively, of whom 22% had fracture instability on follow-up. Associations with instability after nonoperative management include myelopathy (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.0-0.92), cerebrovascular disease (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-1.0), and dens displacement ≥ 2 mm (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07-1.0). Advanced age was not associated with follow-up instability. Initial stability on upright radiographs was associated with stability on follow-up (OR 4.29, 95% CI 1.0-18) with excellent sensitivity and positive predictive value (sensitivity 89%, specificity 35%, positive predictive value 83%, and negative predictive value 46%). The overall complication rate and respiratory failure requiring ventilation on individual complication analysis were more common in operatively managed patients (33% vs 3%, respectively; p = 0.007), even though they were generally younger and healthier than those managed nonoperatively. Operative or nonoperative management conferred no difference in length of hospital or ICU stay, discharge disposition, or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors delineate the validity of upright cervical radiographs on presentation in association with follow-up stability in type II odontoid fractures. In their experience, factors associated with instability included cervical myelopathy, cerebrovascular disease, and fracture displacement but not increased age. Operatively managed patients had higher complication rates than those managed without surgery. Fibrous union, which can occur with nonoperative management, provided adequate stability.

Complete Atlantoaxial Dislocation After Odontoid Synchondrosis Fracture: A 2-Year Follow-up Study: A Case Report

CASE

Spine injuries are rare in children, but when they do occur, the synchondrosis of C2 may be involved. A 5-year-old boy presented to our clinic complaining of neck pain for 6 weeks, which started after wrestling with peers. He had slight upper extremity weakness, clonus, and diminished reflexes. Imaging, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans, showed a fracture dislocation through the synchondrosis of the odontoid. The patient was initially treated with admission to the hospital, awake halo placement, and gradual traction over a few days. Subsequently, he was taken for transoral reduction and posterior instrumented fusion of C1-C3 using a combination of sublaminar suture, screws, and rods. Most recently, he was doing well over 2 years later, with no residual neurologic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The case presented demonstrates one option for an otherwise nonreducible odontoid synchondrosis fracture with complete atlantoaxial dislocation: transoral reduction and open posterior instrumentation. This proved to be a practical technique and provided a good clinical result in this case. These injuries are rare, but when they do occur, the examination can be surprisingly subtle given the severity of the injury. Plain films should be scrutinized carefully and advanced imaging obtained when necessary to confirm the diagnosis.

Use of simultaneous traction over a halo ring to achieve reduction of a type 2 odontoid fracture for anterior odontoid screw fixation

Introduction

Odontoid fractures are common. They represent 20% of all cervical trauma. There is a trend towards surgical stabilization. Fracture fixation with 1 or 2 anterior screws is standard operative treatment in younger population.

Presentation of case

A case of type 2 odontoid fracture. The fracture was fixed initially with a halo vest temporarily. The patient was later treated operatively with anterior odontoid screw fixation. Reduction of the fracture was achieved using a bivector traction over a halo ring. The patient achieved an anatomical reduction and a rigid fixation.

Discussion

Type 2 odontoid fracture is very controversial to treat. Several methods of fracture reduction have been described in the literature including Gardner-Wells Tongs and Mayfield head clamp. To our knowledge, fracture reduction with biverctor traction over a halo frame hasn’t been described before in the literature.

Conclusion

Bivector traction over a halo ring can be used for intraoperative reduction of odontoid fracture.

Postoperative intracranial migration of a C2 odontoid screw: A case report and literature review

Background:

Intracranial migration of odontoid screws is a rare but serious complication of anterior odontoid screw fixation not often reported in literature by neurosurgeons. Here, we describe the second case in literature of intracranial migration of an odontoid screw.

Case Description:

A 64-year-old neurologically intact patient with a type II odontoid fracture secondary to trauma underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation without any intraoperative complications. He tolerated the procedure well, and postoperative imaging demonstrated near anatomic correction of the fracture with satisfactory placement of the lag screw. Unfortunately, the patient was subsequently lost to follow up and he presented 7 months later for a routine outpatient computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine, which demonstrated upward migration of the screw into the intracranial cavity abutting the medulla, with CT angiography of the neck also confirming the screw lying between the two vertebral arteries. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine also demonstrated the odontoid screw lying within close proximity to the ventral cervicomedullary junction, marginating the left vertebral artery. Subsequently, the patient was managed with removal of the odontoid screw and posterior cervical arthrodesis and instrumented fusion.

Conclusion:

Our case demonstrates the rare but serious complication of intracranial odontoid screw migration, which we bring to the attention of the neurosurgical community. The recognition of risk factors for this complication and optimized management of this rare occurrence is important for surgeons to recognize.

Posterior occiput-cervical fixation for metastasis to upper cervical spine

Background:

Metastasis to craniocervical area may result in instability manifesting as disabling pain, cranial nerve dysfunction, paralysis, or even death. Stabilization is required to prevent complications. Nonoperative treatment modalities are ineffective in providing stability and adequate pain relief. We present our experience of diagnosis, presentation, and surgical management for metastatic tumors to the upper cervical spine (UCS).

Methods:

Single-center single-surgeon database of consecutively operated posterior occiput-cervical fusion for metastasis to UCS was reviewed from 2007 to 2016. Demographics, clinical, and surgical data were collected through chart review. Pain scores based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and other radiological data were noted. Kaplan–Meier curve was used for survival analysis. Clinical outcomes and complications were recorded.

Results:

A total of 29 patients (17 females/12 males) had the mean age of 56.7 ± 13.5 (24–82). Predominant metastasis included from the breast in 9 (31.03%) cases, followed by renal in 5, melanoma in 4, and 3 each from lung and colon. Axis was involved in 24 cases (C2 body in 21, pedicle in 8 cases). Atlas was involved in 9 cases (lateral mass in 8 cases and arch in 3 cases) and occiput was involved in three cases. Average Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score was 10 ± 2.3 (7–14). Mild cord compression was seen in 7 cases. Fusion extended from occiput to C4 fusion (n = 23), C5 (n = 5), and C6 (n = 1). Average blood loss was 364.8 ± 252.1 ml and operative time was 235 ± 51.9 min. Average length of stay was 7 ± 2.8 days (3–15). VAS improved from 8.3 ± 1.5 to 1 ± 1.1 (P < 0.001). C2 angulation corrected from 2.1° ±5.3° (0°–17°) to 0.5° ±1.2° (P = 0.045). Three patients each developed cardiopulmonary complications and deep infection. The average survival was 14.5 ± 15.1 (0.15–50) months.

Conclusion:

C2 body is the most common site of metastasis. Occiput-cervical fusion for unstable upper cervical metastasis offers a good palliative treatment for pain relief and improved quality of life.

Nonoperative management of C-2 dens fractures: Single center experience and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

The demographic change in the population leads to a rising number of patients presenting with fractures of the cervical spine, especially C-2, due to falls. With an increase of co-morbidities in these elder patients, the risk for intra- and postoperative complications is increased likewise. Thus, an alternative strategy instead of operative management of these fractures should be taken into account whenever possible. Conservative management of dens fractures in the elderly is still a subject of great controversy despite numerous studies on this topic. The aim of this study was to analyze the rate of successful osseous consolidation of C-2 fractures with conservative treatment by wearing a semi-rigid collar or halo thoracic vest without further surgical intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the medical records and CT-scan of the cervical spine of 254 patients with C-2 fractures retrospectively, who were admitted to our department between January 1990 and September 2015. Fractures were diagnosed by CT-scan of the cervical spine and classified according to the Anderson - D`Alonzo classification. 183 patients were submitted to surgery as treatment of choice. In 71 patients a conservative management with external immobilization was chosen. The latter group was subjected to study analysis.

RESULTS

71 patients (mean age 74.08 years ± 16.06 years) were diagnosed with C-2 fractures (Typ I: 4; Typ II 36; Typ III: 31) and treated conservatively using a Philadelphia collar (n = 57), or a halo-thoracic vest (n = 14), respectively. 12 patients were lost to follow up and excluded from further analysis. Conservative treatment of the fractures was deemed successful when a bony consolidation of the fracture in follow-up CT scans was seen (45 of 59 patients; 76.3%). 20 patients with a Type II fracture (20/28, 71.4%) showed a successful ossification. In 14 patients (overall 23.7%; Typ I: 1 (7.14%), Typ II: 8 (57.14%), Typ III: 5 (35.71%)) external immobilization failed to achieve primary stability. These patients were submitted to consecutive surgery.

CONCLUSION

From our data it can be concluded that elderly patients, presenting with non-dislocated Type II fractures of the axis without accompaining neurological deficits, will have a more than 70% chance for a bony consolidation by conservative management. Consolidation rates may be estimated even higher in Type I and III fractures. Therefore, we suggest that external immobilization might be a valuable option to treat elderly patients with these fractures under certain circumstances.

The magnitude of angular and translational displacement of dens fractures is dependent on the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine rather than the force of injury

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although it is generally believed that the magnitude of dens fracture displacement is proportional to the amount of force applied to the cervical spine during injury, the factors responsible for displacement have not been studied.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to determine factors that contribute to horizontal and angular displacement of dens fractures.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients who were admitted to our level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2013.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Angular and horizontal displacements of the fractured dens in 57 patients were measured. Subjects were grouped based on mechanism of fracture: motor vehicle accident, ground level fall, and higher falls.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cervical lordosis was measured between C2 and T1. C3-C4, C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 disc inclination angles were measured. Anteroposterior sagittal balance was assessed by comparing the sagittal position of the C2 body with the C7 body.

METHODS

Data were analyzed using Pearson correlations, independent t tests, and support vector regression to construct predictive models that determine factors contributing to the angular and horizontal displacements.

RESULTS

The mean horizontal displacement of the fractured dens was not significantly different among groups. However, the dens in those with ground level falls had a significantly greater mean fracture angle compared with the higher energy trauma groups (p=.01). There were positive correlations between angular displacement and C5-C6 disc space inclination angle (r=0.67, p<.01) and C6-C7 disc space inclination angle (r=0.61, p<.01). There were positive correlations between horizontal displacement and C6-C7 inclination angle (r=0.40, p<.01) and sagittal alignment (r=0.32, p<.01). The predictive model using all variables demonstrated that angular fracture displacement was only dependent on C5-C6 disc space inclination angle. Horizontal displacement was only dependent on C6-C7 inclination angle and anteroposterior sagittal balance.

CONCLUSIONS

Disc space inclination angles of the lower cervical spine and the cervical sagittal balance most contribute to the magnitude of angular and horizontal displacement of the dens after fracture.

Treatment of Axis Body Fractures: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Evidence-based systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To define the optimal treatment of fractures involving the C2 body, including those with concomitant injuries, based upon a systematic review of the literature.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Axis body fractures have customarily been treated nonoperatively, but there are some injuries that may require operative intervention. High-quality literature is sparse and there are few class I or class II studies to guide treatment decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus (EMBASE, MEDLINE, COMPENDEX). The quality of literature was rated according to a grading tool developed by the Center for Evidence-based Medicine. Operative and nonoperative treatment of axis body fractures were compared using fracture bony union as the primary outcome measure. As risk factors for nonunion were not consistently reported, cases were analyzed individually.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 62 studies, of which 10 were case reports which were excluded from the analysis. A total of 920 patients from 52 studies were included. The overall bony union rate for all axis body fractures was 91%. Although the majority of fractures were treated nonoperatively, there has been an increasing trend toward operative intervention for Benzel type III (transverse) axis body fractures. Nearly 76% of axis body fractures were classified as type III fractures, of which 88% united successfully. Nearly all Benzel type I and type II axis body fractures were successfully treated nonoperatively. The risk factors for nonunion included: a higher degree of subluxation, fracture displacement, comminution, concurrent injuries, delay in treatment, and older age.

CONCLUSIONS

High rates for fracture union are reported in the literature for axis body fractures with nonoperative treatment. High-quality prospective studies are required to develop consensus as to which C2 body fractures require operative fixation.

Management of Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly: A Review of the Literature and an Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithm

Odontoid fractures are the most common fracture of the axis and the most common cervical spine fracture in patients over 65. Despite their frequency, there is considerable ambiguity regarding optimal management strategies for these fractures in the elderly. Poor bone health and medical comorbidities contribute to increased surgical risk in this population; however, nonoperative management is associated with a risk of nonunion or fibrous union. We provide a review of the existing literature and discuss the classification and evaluation of odontoid fractures. The merits of operative vs nonoperative management, fibrous union, and the choice of operative approach in elderly patients are discussed. A treatment algorithm is presented based on the available literature. We believe that type I and type III odontoid fractures can be managed in a collar in most cases. Type II fractures with any additonal risk factors for nonunion (displacement, comminution, etc) should be considered for surgical management. However, the risks of surgery in an elderly population must be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis. In a frail elderly patient, a fibrous nonunion with close follow-up is an acceptable outcome. If operative management is chosen, a posterior approach is should be chosen when fracture- or patient-related factors make an anterior approach challenging. The high levels of morbidity and mortality associated with odontoid fractures should encourage all providers to pursue medical co-management and optimization of bone health following diagnosis.

Predisposing Factors of Fracture Nonunion After Posterior C1 Lateral Mass Screws Combined with C2 Pedicle/Laminar Screw Fixation for Type II Odontoid Fracture

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore the predisposing factors for fracture nonunion after a lateral screw was combined with C2 pedicle/laminar screw for a type II odontoid fracture and hopefully provide references in decision making and surgical planning for spinal surgeons.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. By retrieving the medical records from January 2010 to July 2015 in our hospital, 117 type II odontoid fracture patients were reviewed. According to the occurrence of fracture union at the final follow-up, patients were divided into 2 groups: union and nonunion. To investigate the predisposing factors for fracture nonunion, 3 categorized factors were analyzed statistically: patient characteristics-age, sex, body mass index, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, duration, comorbidity, and complicated injuries; surgical variables-surgery time, blood loss, C2 fixation manner, vertebral artery injury, bone source for fusion between the posterior arch of C1 and the laminae and spinous process of C2; radiographic parameters-preoperative and immediate postoperative data of C_0-2 curvature, C_2-7 curvature, C_2-7 sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, fracture classification, congenital hypoplastic vertebral artery, and the separation and displacement of the odontoid fracture. Other variables including JOA and visual analog scale scores for neck pain, neck stiffness, and patient satisfaction at final follow-up were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Postoperative fracture nonunion was detected in 76 of 117 patients (65%) at final follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in patient characteristics of sex, body mass index, JOA score, comorbidity, and complicated injuries. The mean age at operation was younger in the union group than in the nonunion group, and the mean duration was shorter in the union group than in the nonunion group. There was no difference in surgical variables of surgery time, blood loss, C2 fixation manner, vertebral artery injury, bone source for fusion between the posterior arch of C1 and the laminae and spinous process of C2. There was no difference in radiographic parameters of fracture classification, congenital hypoplastic vertebral artery, preoperative and immediate postoperative C_0-2 curvature, C_2-7 curvature, C_2-7 SVA, and C7 slope. No difference was found in preoperative and immediate postoperative displacement of the odontoid fracture or immediate postoperative separation of the odontoid fracture, while the preoperative separation of the odontoid fracture was shorter in the union group than in the nonunion group. The logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age (>45 years), long duration (>2 months), and preoperative separation of the odontoid fracture (>4 mm) were independently associated with the postoperative fracture nonunion. There were no differences between the 2 groups in JOA, neck pain, neck stiffness, and patient satisfaction at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age, long duration, and preoperative separation of odontoid fracture >4 mm are predisposing factors for fracture nonunion after posterior C1 lateral screw combined with C2 pedicle/laminar screw fixation for type II odontoid fracture. Our findings did not demonstrate any evidence of lower functional outcome and patients satisfaction for those patients who had odontoid nonunion.

Anterior single lag screw fixation in Type II Dens fracture – Indian experience

Increased rate of non-union of Type II Odontoid fractures with rigid external orthosis have been reported. Recently technique of direct anterior screw fixation of the odontoid fracture is being advocated. Here we report the results of 13 cases of Type II dens fracture treated by the above method with an age group ranging from 17 to 73 years. An approach identical to the anterior cervical discectomy was used. Guide tube system devised by Synthes®, single image intensifier and Langenberg retractors was used to place a single cannulated screw through the fracture from C2 body into the dens. Among the 13 cases operated, in 11 cases we were successful. In one case while dissecting the fracture site CSF leak occurred and in another case the guide wire broke leading to abandoning to screw placement. There was no other complication due to the surgical procedure. The follow up period ranged between 2 months to 3 1/2 years. There were no neurological complications or screw fracture. In 9 of the 11 cases (82%) either bony union or fibrous unions have occurred. These results indicate that direct anterior single screw fixation has proved to be a very successful treatment.

C2 Fracture Subtypes, Incidence, and Treatment Allocation Change with Age: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 233 Consecutive Cases

The currently available data on the distribution of C2 fracture subtypes is sparse. This study was designed to identify the proportions of the second cervical vertebra (C2) fracture subtypes and to present age and gender specific incidences of subgroups. A dataset of all patients treated between 2002 and 2014 for C2 fractures was extracted from the regional hospital information system. C2 fractures were classified into odontoid fractures types 1, 2, and 3, Hangman's fractures types 1, 2, and 3, and atypical C2 fractures. 233 patients (female 51%, age 72 ± 19 years) were treated for a C2 fracture. Odontoid fractures were found in 183 patients, of which 2 were type 1, 127 type 2, and 54 type 3, while 26 of C2 fractures were Hangman's fractures and 24 were atypical C2 fractures. In the geriatric subgroup 89% of all C2 fractures were odontoid, of which 71% were type 2 and 29% type 3. There was an increasing incidence of odontoid fractures types 2 and 3 from 2002 to 2014. 40% of C2 fractures were treated surgically. This study presents reliable subset proportions of C2 fractures in a prospectively collected regional cohort. Knowledge of these proportions facilitates future epidemiological studies of C2 fractures.

Deadly falls: operative versus nonoperative management of Type II odontoid process fracture in octogenarians

OBJECTIVE

Type II odontoid fracture is a common injury among elderly patients, particularly given their predisposition toward low-energy falls. Previous studies have demonstrated a survival advantage following early surgery among patients older than 65 years, yet octogenarians represent a medically distinct and rapidly growing population. The authors compared operative and nonoperative management in patients older than 79 years.

METHODS

A single-center prospectively maintained trauma database was reviewed using ICD-9 codes to identify octogenarians with C-2 cervical fractures between 1998 and 2014. Cervical CT images were independently reviewed by blinded neurosurgeons to confirm a Type II fracture pattern. Prospectively recorded outcomes included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, Injury Severity Score (ISS), additional cervical fracture, and cord injury. Primary end points were mortality at 30 days and at 1 year. Statistical tests included the Student t-test, chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier test, and Cox proportional hazard.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients met inclusion criteria (94 nonoperative and 17 operative [15 posterior and 2 anterior]). Mortality data were available for 100% of patients. The mean age was 87 years (range 80–104 years). Additional cervical fracture, spinal cord injury, GCS score, AIS score, and ISS were not associated with either management strategy at the time of presentation. The mean time to death or last follow-up was 22 months (range 0–129 months) and was nonsignificant between operative and nonoperative groups (p = 0.3). Overall mortality was 13% in-hospital, 26% at 30 days, and 41% at 1 year. Nonoperative and operative mortality rates were not significant at any time point (12% vs 18%, p = 0.5 [in-hospital]; 27% vs 24%, p = 0.8 [30-day]; and 41% vs 41%, p = 1.0 [1-year]). Kaplan-Meier analysis did not demonstrate a survival advantage for either management strategy. Spinal cord injury, GCS score, AIS score, and ISS were significantly associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality; however, Cox modeling was not significant for any variable. Additional cervical fracture was not associated with increased mortality. The rate of nonhome disposition was not significant between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Type II odontoid fracture is associated with high morbidity among octogenarians, with 41% 1-year mortality independent of intervention—a dramatic decrease from actuarial survival rates for all 80-, 90-, and 100-year-old Americans. Poor outcome is associated with spinal cord injury, GCS score, AIS score, and ISS.

Management and Outcome of Dens Fracture Nonunions in Geriatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Dens fractures are known to have high rates of pseudarthrosis. The aim of this study was to define clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes, specifically in relation to osseous union, cervical spine movement, neurological sequelae, and quality of life, in a geriatric cohort (sixty-five years of age or older) treated operatively or nonoperatively for a dens fracture nonunion.

METHODS

Forty-four patients (twenty-eight women and sixteen men; average age, seventy-two years) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study. Sixteen patients (36%) underwent operative stabilization with posterior cervical arthrodesis, and twenty-eight (64%) were treated nonoperatively with a predefined protocol. All patients had a post-treatment follow-up period of at least five years.

RESULTS

Radiographic evaluation showed osseous union at the site of the C1-C2 arthrodesis in all sixteen patients who had undergone surgical treatment. Clinical follow-up revealed that fourteen had satisfactory results following postoperative rehabilitation. In contrast, radiographic evaluation of the twenty-eight nonoperatively treated patients showed persistence of the pseudarthrosis of the dens in twenty-six and osseous union of the dens in two. All twenty-eight patients (100%) had a satisfactory clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

C1-C2 arthrodesis was a reliable treatment option for dens fracture nonunions that were unstable, those associated with neurological symptoms, and those causing persistent pain. Clinical and radiographic monitoring was an acceptable nonoperative treatment option but was associated with a very low rate of osseous union of the dens.

C1-c2 pedicle screw fixation for treatment of old odontoid fractures

Nonunion and C1-C2 instability of odontoid fractures usually result from delayed diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. However, the available treatment options for odontoid fractures remain controversial. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of internal screw fixation via the C1 and C2 pedicle in cases of old odontoid fractures. This retrospective study included 21 patients with old odontoid fractures (13 men and 8 women; mean age, 46.5 years; range, 24-69 years). Internal screw fixation via the C1 and C2 pedicle was performed in all patients. Fracture reduction and C1-C2 fusion were assessed with imaging. The neck pain visual analog scale score and cervical spinal cord functional Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (for those who had cervical spinal cord injury) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. Postoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative imaging showed that the C1-C2 dislocation was satisfactorily repositioned in all patients. Bone fusion was observed 1 year after surgery in all patients. No loosening or breaking of internal fixation occurred. The preoperative neck pain visual analog scale score was 5.9±1.5 and improved significantly to 1.8±0.8 after surgery (P<.001). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in patients with cervical spinal injury (n=14) was 9.2±1.9 and also significantly improved to 13.8±1.9 at the last follow-up examination (P<.001), with an average improvement rate of 61.0%. No iatrogenic vertebral artery injury or severe spinal cord injury occurred. Screw fixation via the C1 and C2 pedicle was found to be an effective and safe surgical approach for the treatment of old odontoid fractures with C1-C2 dislocation or instability.

Odontoid balloon kyphoplasty associated with screw fixation for Type II fracture in 2 elderly patients

Anterior screw fixation is a well-recognized technique that is used to stabilize Type IIB fractures of the odontoid process in the elderly. However, advanced age and osteoporosis are 2 risk factors for pseudarthrosis. Kyphoplasty has been described in the treatment of lytic lesions in C-2. The authors decided to combine these 2 techniques in the treatment of unstable fractures of the odontoid. Two approximately 90-year-old patients were treated for this type of fracture. Instability was demonstrated on dynamic radiography in one patient, and the fracture was seen on static radiography in the other. Clinical parameters, pain, range of motion, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score (for the first patient), and radiological examinations (CT scans and dynamic radiographs) were studied both before and after surgery. After inflating the balloon both above and below the fracture line, the authors applied a high-viscosity polymethylmethacrylate cement. Some minor leakage of cement was noted in both cases but proved to be harmless. The screws were correctly positioned. The clinical result was excellent, both in terms of pain relief and in the fact that there was no reduction in the SF-36 score. The range of motion remained the same. A follow-up CT scan obtained 1 year later in one of the patients showed no evidence of change in the materials used, and the dynamic radiographs showed no instability. This combination of kyphoplasty and anterior screw fixation of the odontoid seems to be an interesting technique in osteoporotic Type IIB fractures of the odontoid process in the elderly, with good results both clinically and radiologically.

Systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly

Odontoid fractures type II according to Anderson and d'Alonzo are not uncommon in the elderly patients. Still, due to the paucity of evidence the published treatment guidelines are far from equivocal. This systematic review focuses on the published results of type II odontoid fracture treatment in the elderly with regard to survival, nonunion, and complications. After a systematic literature research 38 publications were included. A cumulative analysis of 1284 published cases found greater survival if elderly patients with odontoid fractures type II received surgical treatment (RR = 0.64). With regard to nonunion in 669 published cases primary posterior fusion had the best fusion results. The systematic literature review came to the following conclusions. (1) Surgical stabilisation of odontoid fractures type II improves survival in patients between 65 and 85 years of age compared to nonsurgical treatment. (2) Posterior atlantoaxial fusion for odontoid fractures type II in the elderly has the greatest bony union rate. (3) Odontoid nonunion is not associated with worse clinical or functional results in the elderly. (4) The complication rate of nonsurgical treatment is similar to the complication rate of surgical treatment of odontoid fractures type II in the elderly.

Fractures of the cervical spine

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to review the literature on cervical spine fractures.

METHODS

The literature on the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of lower and upper cervical fractures and dislocations was reviewed.

RESULTS

Fractures of the cervical spine may be present in polytraumatized patients and should be suspected in patients complaining of neck pain. These fractures are more common in men approximately 30 years of age and are most often caused by automobile accidents. The cervical spine is divided into the upper cervical spine (occiput-C2) and the lower cervical spine (C3-C7), according to anatomical differences. Fractures in the upper cervical spine include fractures of the occipital condyle and the atlas, atlanto-axial dislocations, fractures of the odontoid process, and hangman's fractures in the C2 segment. These fractures are characterized based on specific classifications. In the lower cervical spine, fractures follow the same pattern as in other segments of the spine; currently, the most widely used classification is the SLIC (Subaxial Injury Classification), which predicts the prognosis of an injury based on morphology, the integrity of the disc-ligamentous complex, and the patient's neurological status. It is important to correctly classify the fracture to ensure appropriate treatment. Nerve or spinal cord injuries, pseudarthrosis or malunion, and postoperative infection are the main complications of cervical spine fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractures of the cervical spine are potentially serious and devastating if not properly treated. Achieving the correct diagnosis and classification of a lesion is the first step toward identifying the most appropriate treatment, which can be either surgical or conservative.

Unstable odontoid fracture: surgical strategy in a 22-case series, and literature review

Surgical treatment of unstable odontoid fracture (type II OBAR or HTAL) has progressed, with a range of techniques, the specificities of which need to be known so as to determine their respective roles in the therapeutic arsenal now available. A retrospective study of 22 patients operated on in our center for odontoid fracture between 2005 and 2010 examined the operative techniques employed and analyzed results in the light of the literature, so as to construct an updated decision tree. Two populations could be distinguished: elderly victims of simple fall (mean age, 82.1 years), and younger victims of high-energy trauma (mean age, 42.6 years). Surgical techniques comprised: anterior odontoid screwing (n=14), transarticular C1-C2 screwing on the posterior Magerl (n=3) or anterior Vaccaro approach (n=1), Harms' posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis (n=3), and occipitocervical arthrodesis (n=3). The overall complications rate for the series was 28%, including one case of non-union, at a mean 11 months' follow-up. The risk/benefit ratio may be hard to assess in elderly patients. However, anterior screwing restores odontoid anatomy and is the technique of choice in first intention for reducible fracture. In second intention, transarticular C1-C2arthrodesis may be performed on an anterior or posterior approach, depending on local vertebral artery anatomy. Harms' posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis allows fixation of non-reduced fractures. Occipitocervical arthrodesis is a last resort, as the associated morbidity rate is higher.

Elderly patients are at increased risk for mortality undergoing surgical repair of dens fractures

OBJECTIVE

Dens fractures are common cervical injuries in advanced aged patients. The presented study was undertaken to analyze the clinical results and risks of surgically treated patients with dens fractures over 70 years.

METHODS

Data of 28 patients (17 female, 11 male) over 70 years treated from September 2004 to October 2009 were recorded. Clinical and radiological parameters were obtained including type of fracture, associated cervical and/or other injuries, comorbidities, symptoms, neurological condition, surgical strategy, postoperative course and complications.

RESULTS

89% were in a good neurological condition before surgery (ASIA E or D). In most cases, surgery was performed at an early stage after trauma (21 patients within 5 days). Ventral screw fixation was the preferred surgical strategy (64%). A slight worsening of neurological functions immediately after operation was only seen in one patient. Five patients died in the early and 2 in the late postoperative course which means a treatment mortality of 25%. Among the surviving patients two had general medical complications.

CONCLUSION

Type II dens fractures are a common fracture of elderly patients. Our results are good concerning the neurological functions. Surgical and general medical complications were acceptable. However, the study also underlines that mortality rate is high and therefore treatment options should be well-considered in this high risk group.

Biomechanical evaluation of 2 insertion points for ventral screw fixation of C-2 dens fractures

Object

For many Type II fractures of the dens (Anderson and D'Alonzo classification), a double anterior screw fixation is performed. If screw disruption occurs, the location is most often at the anterior caudal endplate and body of the axis and not directly at the fracture line. The authors' objective was to determine the differences in primary mechanical stability at 2 insertion points used in ventral screw fixation of Type II fractures of the C-2 dens.

Methods

Screw fixation was performed on 16 formalin-fixed human C-2 dens specimens. The specimens were divided into 2 groups. For Group 1, the screws were inserted directly at the anterior lower endplates; for Group 2, the screws were inserted 2 mm dorsal to the anterior wall of the vertebral body. After a Type II odontoid fracture was created with an oscillating saw, screw fixation was performed using two 3.5-mm partially threaded lag screws with washers. Subsequently, each vertebral body was continuously loaded. The criterion for breakage was reversal of the force vector.

Results

In Group 1, screw disruption occurred at the point of entry; the mean load failure was 290.5 ± 106 N. In Group 2, no screw disruption occurred; the mean load failure was 574.2 ± 170.5 N. These results were significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

For double screw fixation of Type II fractures of the dens (Anderson and D'Alonzo classification), placement of the screws as far dorsal to the anterior lower endplate as possible seems to favorably affect primary stability. In actual clinical practice, care should be taken to not damage the anterior wall of the vertebral body of the axis during screw insertion.

Low Force Fracture of the Odontoid, with Discussion of High Force Cervical Fracture

Cervical fracture may occur with a high force mechanism of injury such as a motor vehicle crash, or with a low force mechanism of injury such as a ground level fall. To better characterize and understand low force cervical fractures and their significance, case files from the Travis County Medical Examiner's office covering a 5-year time period were retrospectively reviewed for fatal cervical fracture occurring with an accidental ground level fall. Thirty such fatal cervical fractures were identified, all occurring in elderly individuals (>65 years of age), with odontoid type 2 fracture of the C2 vertebra identified as the most frequent type of fracture. Odontoid fracture should be included in the list of craniocervical injury that may result from not only motor vehicle crashes and other high force mechanisms of injury, but also low force mechanisms of injury such as a ground level fall with head impact in an elderly individual.

Open reduction and internal fixation for angulated, unstable odontoid synchondrosis fractures in children: a safe alternative to halo fixation?

External orthosis is the accepted and historical management of odontoid synchondrosis fractures; however, this conservative therapy carries a significant complication and fracture nonunion rate among young children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the authors' own experience in the context of the literature, to explore surgical fixation as a primary treatment for unstable fractures. The authors retrospectively reviewed 2 cases of unstable odontoid synchondrosis fractures treated at their institution; both showed radiographic progression of deformity and subsequently underwent an open surgical reduction and fusion. A literature review was conducted to compare the authors' management strategy with those in published data. External orthosis for treatment of odontoid synchondrosis fractures has a strong history of success. However, in the literature, patients treated with a halo orthosis had a 43.3% rate of complications and an 11.4% risk of nonunion. There are radiographic findings that suggest instability, such as severe angulation and displacement of the odontoid process. Both patients in the present report underwent successful fusion without complication, as documented on CT scans obtained 3 months after surgery. Given the high rate of fusion attained with conservative therapy, it is recommended for most synchondrosis fractures. However, there is a recognized subgroup of synchondrosis fractures with severe angulation (> 30°) and displacement suggestive of significant ligamentous injury. In these patients, surgical fixation may be a safe and efficacious alternative to halo orthosis as the primary treatment.

Anterior screw fixation of type IIB odontoid fractures in octogenarians

PURPOSE

Type IIB odontoid fractures (OF) in elderly patients are life-threatening conditions. Optimal treatment of these fractures is still controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcome of surgically treated type IIB OF by anterior screw fixation in octogenarians.

METHODS

Eleven octogenarians with type IIB OF were operated using anterior screw fixation. Follow-up assessment included operative mortality and morbidity rates, long-term functional outcome and fracture union and stability.

RESULTS

There was neither operative mortality nor morbidity. Five patients had excellent clinical outcome, two good outcome, one fair and three poor. Two patients died of unrelated causes 2 months after surgery. Radiographs showed stable bone union in four patients and stable fibrous union in five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the results in this short series, we suggest that anterior screw fixation of Type IIB OF may be offered as primary treatment in octogenarians.

Radiographic analysis of type II odontoid fractures in a geriatric patient population: description and pathomechanism of the "Geier"-deformity

INTRODUCTION

Type II odontoid fractures are one among the most common cervical spine fractures in the elders. We reviewed a consecutive series of patients, aged 65 years and older, presenting to our institution with type II odontoid fractures. Our analysis focused on the radiographic outcome, union rate and the development of cervical spine postural deformity.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Indications for surgical treatment (OP) included displaced or unstable injuries. Stable, non-displaced injuries or patients with significant co-morbidities were treated nonoperatively (non-op).

RESULTS

Ninety patients (50 f, 40 m) with an average age of 83 years (65-101) were identified. 31 (34.4%) patients were received OP and 57 (63.3%) were received non-op treatments. The hospital length of stay was significantly longer after OP (mean 10 days vs. 6 days non-op) treatment (p = 0.007). At follow-up, higher union rates were noted in the OP (76.2%) than in the non-op group (58.3%).

CONCLUSION

We observed a characteristic cervical spine deformity in geriatric patients with type II odontoid fractures, and have termed this the "Geier-deformity". Clinical findings of the deformity include sagittal imbalance and kyphosis of the lower cervical spine.

Efficacy of anterior odontoid screw fixation in the elderly patient: a CT-based biometrical analysis of odontoid fractures

In the elderly population, reported union rates with anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) for odontoid fracture (OF) treatment vary between 23 and 93% when using plain radiographs. However, recent research revealed poor interobserver reliability for fusion assessment using plain radiographs compared to CT scans. Therefore, union rates in patients aged ≥60 years treated with AOSF have to be revisited using CT scans and factors for non-union to be analysed. Prospectively gathered consecutively treated patients using AOSF for odontoid fracture with age ≥60 years were reviewed. Medical charts were assessed for demographics, clinical outcomes and complications. Patients' preoperative radiographs and CT scans were analysed to characterize fracture morphology and type, fracture displacement, presence of atlanto-dental osteoarthritis as well as a detailed morphometric assessment of fracture surfaces (in mm(2)). CT scans performed after a minimum of 3 months postoperatively were analysed for fracture union. Those patients not showing CT-based evidence of completely fused odontoid fracture were invited for radiographic follow-up at a minimum of 6 months follow-up. Follow-up CT-scan were studied for odontoid union as well as the number of screws used and the square surface of screws used for AOSF and the related corticocancellous osseous healing surface of the odontoid fragment (in %) were calculated. Patients were stratified whether they achieved osseous union or fibrous non-union. Patients with a non-union were subjected to flexion-extension lateral radiographs and the non-union defined as stable if no motion was detected. The sample included 13 male (72%) and 5 female (18%) patients. The interval from injury to AOSF was 4.1 ± 5.3 days (0-16 days). Age at injury was 78.1 ± 7.6 years (60-87 years) and follow-up was 75.7 ± 50.8 months (4.2-150.2 months). 10 patients had dislocated fractures, 14 had Type II and 4 "shallow" Type III fractures according to the Anderson classification, 2 had stable C1-ring fractures, 8 had displayed atlanto-dental osteoarthritis. Fracture square surface was 127.1 ± 50.9 mm(2) (56.3-215.9 mm(2)) and osseous healing surface was 84.0 ± 6.8% (67.6-91.1%). CT-based analysis revealed osseous union in 9 (50%) and non-union in 9 patients (50%). Union rates correlated with increased fracture surface (P = 0.02). Statistical analysis revealed a trend that the usage of two screws with AOSF correlates with increased fusion rates (P = 0.06). Stability at C1-2 was achieved in 89% of patients. CT scans are accepted as the standard of reference to assess osseous union. The current study offers an objective insight into the union rates of odontoid fractures treated with AOSF using CT scans in consecutive series of 18 patients ≥60 years. Literature serves evidence that elderly patients with unstable OF benefit from early surgical stabilization. However, although using AOSF for unstable OF yields segmental stability at C1-2 in a high number of patients as echoed in the current study, our analysis stressed that using follow-up CT scans in comparison to biplanar radiographs dramatically reduces osseous union rates compared to those previously reported for AOSF.

The best surgical treatment for type II fractures of the dens is still controversial

BACKGROUND

Odontoid fractures are the most common odontoid injury and often cause atlantoaxial instability. Reports on postoperative status of patients who underwent surgery for such injuries are limited to small case series, and it is unclear whether any one technique produces better outcomes than another.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We assessed the quality of the available literature for management of Type II odontoid fractures and surgery-related parameters, including surgical indications, clinical failure rate, and survivorship, postoperative ROM and function, neurologic deficits, complication and death rates, and radiographic healing rates related to either anterior dens screw or posterior C1-C2 fusion.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Reviews, and Google Scholar databases. We used the methodology score proposed by Coleman et al. to rate study quality. Postoperative imaging bone union rates were extracted. Postoperative complications and neurologic impairment data were also collected.

RESULTS

Sixteen retrospective studies of overall low quality (average methodology score, 37.1) reporting a total of 518 patients were included. The methodology score and publication year were positively associated. The bone union rate approximated 83% (range, 33%-100%), with higher nonunion rates among patients older than 65 years. The death rate ranged widely (0%-28.6%) among different centers. Residual cervical pain was documented postoperatively from 10.5% to 26.7%, while survivorship ranged from 72% to 96.6%. No ROM data were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data on patients who had surgery for fracture of the dens did not allow us to establish superiority of one surgical approach over another.

Transoral reduction of irreducible posteriorly displaced odontoid fracture

A case of type II odontoid fracture with irreducible posterior dislocation is presented. Cervical traction was employed but reduction could not be achieved with up to 15 kg of traction. The patient was treated with intraoperative transoral open reduction combined with anterior-posterior fixation. Rigid fixation and bone union were obtained without any complication in the 12-month follow-up. The patient has restricted C-spine rotation but no neck pain with movement. Transoral open reduction may be considered in patients with irreducible posteriorly displaced odontoid fracture.

Optimal treatment for odontoid fractures in the elderly

STUDY DESIGN

Clinically based systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To define optimal clinical care for elderly patients with Type II and III odontoid fractures using a systematic review with expert opinion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Numerous manuscripts have been written about treatment strategies of odontoid fractures in the elderly. However, these articles are of low quality and optimal treatment algorithms do not exist.

METHODS

Focused questions on the treatment of elderly patients with Type II and III odontoid fractures were refined by a panel of spine traumologists surgeons, consisting of fellowship trained neurologic and orthopedic surgeons. MeSH keywords were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews, and pertinent abstracts and manuscripts obtained. The quality of literature was rated as high, moderate, low, or very low. Using the GRADE evidence-based review system, the proposed questions were answered using the literature review and expert opinion. These treatment recommendations were then rated as either strong or weak based on the quality of evidence and clinical expertise.

RESULTS

The literature searches revealed low and very low quality evidence with no prospective or randomized studies. The MEDLINE search engine returned 1759 articles, which were further limited to "all aged (65 and over)," human subjects and the English language. The subsequent search resulted in a return of 377 manuscripts. These abstracts where then reviewed in detail and 117 manuscripts were selected, which were obtained and supplemented with additional manuscripts to form an evidentiary table.

CONCLUSION

Odontoid fractures have a significant morbidity in the elderly (>65 years) population. Type II fractures in this population are recommended to be treated operatively with a weak recommendation, and if treated nonoperatively using a hard collar immobilization device. Type III odontoid fractures in the elderly optimal treatment with a strong recommendation is immobilization in a hard collar.

Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: an evidence-based narrative review of management

Considerable controversy exists regarding the optimal management of elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures. There is uncertainty regarding the consequences of non-union. The best treatment remains unclear because of the morbidity associated with prolonged cervical immobilisation versus the risks of surgical intervention. The objective of the study was to evaluate the published literature and determine the current evidence for the management of type II odontoid fractures in elderly. A search of the English language literature from January 1970 to date was performed using Medline and the following keywords: odontoid, fractures, cervical spine and elderly. The search was supplemented by cross-referencing between articles. Case reports and review articles were excluded although some were referred to in the discussion. Studies in patients aged 65 years with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were selected. One-hundred twenty-six articles were reviewed. No class I study was identified. There were two class II studies and the remaining were class III. Significant variability was found in the literature regarding mortality and morbidity rates in patients treated with and without halo vest immobilisation. In recent years several authors have claimed satisfactory results with anterior odontoid screw fixation while others have argued that this may lead to increased complications in this age group. Lately, the posterior cervical (Goel-Harms) construct has also gained popularity amongst surgeons. There is insufficient evidence to establish a standard or guideline for odontoid fracture management in elderly. While most authors agree that cervical immobilisation yields satisfactory results for type I and III fractures in the elderly, the optimal management for type II fractures remain unsolved. A prospective randomised controlled trial is recommended.

Axis fractures

BACKGROUND

Traumatic fractures of the second cervical vertebra are common, representing nearly 20% of all acute cervical spinal fracture-dislocation injuries. They are divided into 3 distinct injury patterns: odontoid fractures, hangman's fracture injuries, and fractures of the axis body, involving all other fracture injuries to the C2 vertebra.

OBJECTIVE

An evidence-based overview of the medical and surgical treatment strategies for each axis fracture injury sub-type.

RESULTS

Current medical and surgical management of traumatic fractures of the axis.

Anterior screw fixation for odontoid fracture: clinical results in 45 cases

Clinical results of anterior screw fixation in 45 patients with odontoid fractures were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were 36 males and 9 females, with fractures classified as 35 type II and 10 type III. There were 34 fresh and 11 old fractures. Neurological complications were present in 16 patients and 18 had associated injuries. All patients underwent single screw fixation. Postoperative immobilization, external support, and surgical trauma were minimal. In one patient a screw extruded from the dens and immediate posterior fusion was necessary. The overall rate of fracture union was 93% (41 out of 44 fractures). Fracture resolution averaged 5.2 months. There were two delayed unions and three nonunions, the causes of which were preoperatively established nonunion, severe osteoporosis, and inaccurate screw placement. Out of 11 old cases, 8 went on to union. Ninety-six percent of the patients recovered neurologically. The overall complication rate, including a misplaced screw, a retropharyngeal wall injury, and three nonunions, was 11%. Head rotation was preserved in 90% of the patients with fracture union according to clinical measurements. Anterior screw fixation is an excellent treatment for fresh type II and cephalad type III odontoid fractures, carrying a high union rate, preservation of the C1-2 motion segment, and minimal surgical trauma; it can be applied even to some old cases. Precise patient selection in regard to patient age, bone density, and time elapsed since injury as well as preoperative anatomical reduction and meticulous surgical technique with fine fluoroscopy are essential to avoid complications and nonunions.

Operative versus nonoperative management of acute odontoid Type II fractures: a meta-analysis

Object

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the criteria described in the literature as the indications for surgery for acute Type II odontoid fractures.

Methods

The authors searched the PubMed database for studies in which the fusion rate of acute Type II odontoid fractures following external immobilization (halo vest or collar) or surgery (posterior C1–2 fusion or anterior screw fixation) was reported. The only studies included reported the fusion rate for either 1) groups of patients whose age was either more or less than a certain age range (45–55 years); or 2) groups of patients with a fracture displacement of either more or less than a certain odontoid fracture displacement (4–6 mm) or the direction of displacement (see Methods section of text for more details). A meta-analysis in which the random effect model was used was conducted to analyze the data.

Results

There was a statistically significantly higher fusion rate for operative management compared with external immobilization (85 vs 60%, p = 0.01) for the patients > 45–55 years. However, the overall fusion rate was > 80% for the patients whose age was < 45–55 years, regardless of treatment modality, and no significant differences were observed between surgically and nonsurgically treated patients (89 and 81%, respectively; p = 0.29). The result of operation (overall fusion rate 89%) was superior to external immobilization (44%) when the fracture was posteriorly displaced (p < 0.001), but for anteriorly displaced fractures, the results of operative and nonoperative management were identical (p = 0.15). The overall fusion rate of operative management of both anteriorly and posteriorly displaced fractures proved to be > 85%, and no statistically significant difference was observed (p = 0.50). For all degrees of displacement (either > or < 4–6 mm) the operation proved to provide significantly better results than conservative treatment. The fusion rate of conservatively treated fractures with < 4–6 mm displacement was significantly better than in fractures with > 4–6 mm displacement (76 vs 41%, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Operative treatment (posterior C1–2 fixation or anterior screw fixation) provides a better fusion rate than external immobilization for acute odontoid Type II fractures, although in certain situations, such as anterior displacement of the fracture and for younger (< 45–55 years of age) patients, conservative management (halo vest or collar immobilization) can be as effective as surgery. Operative management is recommended in older patients, in cases of posterior displacement of the fracture, and when there is displacement of > 4–6 mm.

[Odontoid process fracture in elderly patients over 70 years: morbidity, handicap, and role of surgical treatment in a retrospective series of 27 cases]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Odontoid process fractures of the axis are frequent in elderly patients. However, the impact in terms of handicap and morbidity in this particular population are unknown. The role of surgical treatment remains controversial.

METHODS

We present a retrospective series of patients aged 70 years or older with odontoid fractures treated in our department between 1998 and 2006. Two cohorts were defined (surgery versus conservative) and compared. Morbidity, handicap, and radiographic fusion were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were treated. The mean age was 80.67 years. Five patients died early during hospitalization. Fractures were type II in 66.7% of the cases and type III in 33.3%. Orthopedic treatment was chosen in 44.4% of the cases. A non-union at the fracture site was found in 33% of the cases and morbidity in 41.7% of the cases was found after a 1-year follow-up. Surgery was performed in 40.7% of the cases. There was 18% non-union and no morbidity after 1-year of follow-up. Morbidity was statistically lower in the surgery group (p=0.037), particularly in cases of type II fracture (p=0.0063); no statistically significant difference was found for non-union at the fracture site (p=0.64) except for type II fractures (p=0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Odontoid fractures in the elderly are a very frequent problem. Immediate mortality is still high but appears correlated to associated lesions. Today's treatments must preserve autonomy for these patients. For elderly patients, the treatment must be chosen in relation to the fracture analysis. In our opinion, surgical management is the treatment of choice for unstable fractures (type II). Conservative management is indicated for stable fractures.