1
|
Zhang LY, Guo W, Du HZ, Pan H, Sun YC, Zhu HJ, Song SH, Guo XY, Jiang Y, Sun QQ. Brachytherapy in craniopharyngiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term follow-up. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:637. [PMID: 38790011 PMCID: PMC11127349 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12397-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Brachytherapy has been indicated as an alternative option for treating cystic craniopharyngiomas (CPs). The potential benefits of brachytherapy for CPs have not yet been clarified. The purpose of this work was to conduct a meta-analysis to analyze the long-term efficacy and adverse reactions profile of brachytherapy for CPs. MATERIALS AND METHODS The relevant databases were searched to collect the clinical trials on brachytherapy in patients with CPs. Included studies were limited to publications in full manuscript form with at least 5-year median follow-up, and adequate reporting of treatment outcomes and adverse reactions data. Stata 12.0 was used for data analysis. RESULTS According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 6 clinical trials involving 266 patients with CPs were included in this meta-analysis. The minimum average follow-up was 5 years. The results of the meta-analysis showed that 1-year, 2-3 years and 5 years progression free survival rates (PFS) are 75% (95%CI: 66-84%), 62% (95%CI: 52-72%) and 57% (95%CI: 22-92%), respectively. At the last follow-up, less than 16% of patients with visual outcomes worser than baseline in all included studies. While, for endocrine outcomes, less than 32% of patients worser than baseline level. CONCLUSION In general, based on the above results, brachytherapy should be considered as a good choice for the treatment of CP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Yuan Zhang
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Province Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Cangzhou Hebei, Hebei, 061000, China
| | - Han-Ze Du
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Hui Pan
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Yun-Chuan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Province Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Cangzhou Hebei, Hebei, 061000, China.
| | - Hui-Juan Zhu
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Shuai-Hua Song
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiao-Yuan Guo
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yue Jiang
- Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Qian-Qian Sun
- Department of Endocrinology, The ninth Hospital of Xingtai, Xingtai, Hebei, 055250, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Razak NA, Ping PC, Kamarulzaman K, Hassan SZA. First Local Experience of Intra-Cavitary Yttrium-90 Citrate Colloid Irradiation via Ommaya Reservoir for Refractory Cystic Craniopharyngioma: a Case Report. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 58:129-139. [PMID: 38633287 PMCID: PMC11018573 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-024-00838-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Craniopharyngioma is uncommon benign intracranial tumour that can be cured by surgical resection followed by conventional radiotherapy. However, its anatomical localisation makes the treatment hazardous or impossible. This case report aims to discuss the first local experience of using beta-emitting Yttrium-90 radioisotope in treating a patient with refractory cystic craniopharyngioma. A 43-year-old male who has underlying refractory cystic craniopharyngioma complicated with visual impairment and panhypopituitarism was referred to our nuclear medicine department for intra-cavitary irradiation therapy. Initially, he was presented with blurring of vision and headache which he had two previous resection surgeries of cystic craniopharyngioma. However, due to persistent symptoms, he had Ommaya reservoir shunt inserted for regular aspiration. Despite regular aspiration, his symptoms worsen. He was unsuitable for radiotherapy thus was considered for intra-cystic irradiation with radioisotope. Prior to the therapy, he had pre-therapy assessment with Tc-99 m MAA. He subsequently received Ytrrium-90 citrate colloid of 300 Gy radiation dose to the inner surface of the tumour which complicated with post therapy inflammatory reaction. This first local experience highlights the role of radioisotope as the valuable minimally invasive adjuvant therapy in treating a patient with refractory cystic craniopharyngioma. Further follow-up is necessary to assess the outcome and possible late complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadiah Abd Razak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Pung Choon Ping
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen A, Ai M, Sun T. Advances in the treatment of Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma: How to balance tumor control and quality of life in the current environment: a narrative review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1326595. [PMID: 38188294 PMCID: PMC10771305 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1326595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) presents a significant challenge to neurosurgeons despite its benign histology due to its aggressive behavior and unique growth patterns. This narrative review explores the evolving landscape of ACP treatments and their efficacy, highlighting the continuous development in therapeutic approaches in recent years. Traditionally, complete resection was the primary treatment for ACP, but surgical -related morbidity have led to a shift. The invasive nature of the finger-like protrusions in the histological structure results in a higher recurrence rate for ACP compared to papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP), even after complete macroscopic resection. Given this, combining subtotal resection with adjuvant radiotherapy has shown potential for achieving similar tumor control rates and potentially positive endocrine effects. Simultaneously, adjuvant treatments (such as radiotherapy, intracystic treatment, and catheter implantation) following limited surgery offer alternative approaches for sustained disease control while minimizing morbidity and alleviating clinical symptoms. Additionally, advances in understanding the molecular pathways of ACP have paved the way for targeted drugs, showing promise for therapy. There is a diversity of treatment models for ACP, and determining the optimal approach remains a subject of ongoing debate in the present context. In order to achieve a good-term quality of life (QOL), the main goal of the cyst disappearance or reduction of surgical treatment is still the main. Additionally, there should be a greater emphasis on personalized treatment at this particular stage and the consideration of ACP as a potentially chronic neurosurgical condition. This review navigates the evolving landscape of ACP therapies, fostering ongoing discussions in this complex field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ao Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yueyang People’s Hospital, Yueyang, China
| | - MingDa Ai
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Apps JR, Muller HL, Hankinson TC, Yock TI, Martinez-Barbera JP. Contemporary Biological Insights and Clinical Management of Craniopharyngioma. Endocr Rev 2023; 44:518-538. [PMID: 36574377 DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnac035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are clinically aggressive tumors because of their invasive behavior and recalcitrant tendency to recur after therapy. There are 2 types based on their distinct histology and molecular features: the papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP), which is associated with BRAF-V600E mutations and the adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP), characterized by mutations in CTNNB1 (encoding β-catenin). Patients with craniopharyngioma show symptoms linked to the location of the tumor close to the optic pathways, hypothalamus, and pituitary gland, such as increased intracranial pressure, endocrine deficiencies, and visual defects. Treatment is not specific and mostly noncurative, and frequently includes surgery, which may achieve gross total or partial resection, followed by radiotherapy. In cystic tumors, frequent drainage is often required and intracystic instillation of drugs has been used to help manage cyst refilling. More recently targeted therapies have been used, particularly in PCP, but also now in ACP and clinical trials are underway or in development. Although patient survival is high, the consequences of the tumor and its treatment can lead to severe comorbidities resulting in poor quality of life, in particular for those patients who bear tumors with hypothalamic involvement. Accordingly, in these patients at risk for the development of a hypothalamic syndrome, hypothalamus-sparing treatment strategies such as limited resection followed by irradiation are recommended. In this review, we provide an update on various aspects of CP, with emphasis on recent advances in the understanding of tumor pathogenesis, clinical consequences, management, and therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Richard Apps
- Institute of Cancer and Genomics Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Developmental Biology and Cancer, Birth Defects Research Centre, GOS Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
- Oncology Department, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK
| | - Hermann Lothar Muller
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, 26133 Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Todd Cameron Hankinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Program, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Torunn Ingrid Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Juan Pedro Martinez-Barbera
- Developmental Biology and Cancer, Birth Defects Research Centre, GOS Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Piloni M, Gagliardi F, Bailo M, Losa M, Boari N, Spina A, Mortini P. Craniopharyngioma in Pediatrics and Adults. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2023; 1405:299-329. [PMID: 37452943 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23705-8_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas are rare malignancies of dysembryogenic origin, involving the sellar and parasellar areas. These low-grade, epithelial tumors account for two main histological patterns (adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma and papillary craniopharyngioma), which differ in epidemiology, pathogenesis, and histomorphological appearance. Adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas typically show a bimodal age distribution (5-15 years and 45-60 years), while papillary craniopharyngiomas are limited to adult patients, especially in the fifth and sixth decades of life. Recently, craniopharyngioma histological subtypes have been demonstrated to harbor distinct biomolecular signatures. Somatic mutations in CTNNB1 gene encoding β-catenin have been exclusively detected in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas, which predominantly manifest as cystic lesions, while papillary craniopharyngiomas are driven by BRAF V600E mutations in up to 95% of cases and are typically solid masses. Despite the benign histological nature (grade I according to the World Health Organization classification), craniopharyngiomas may heavily affect long-term survival and quality of life, due to their growth pattern in a critical region for the presence of eloquent neurovascular structures and possible neurological sequelae following their treatment. Clinical manifestations are mostly related to the involvement of hypothalamic-pituitary axis, optic pathways, ventricular system, and major blood vessels of the circle of Willis. Symptoms and signs referable to intracranial hypertension, visual disturbance, and endocrine deficiencies should promptly raise the clinical suspicion for sellar and suprasellar pathologies, advocating further neuroimaging investigations, especially brain MRI. The optimal therapeutic management of craniopharyngiomas is still a matter of debate. Over the last decades, the surgical strategy for craniopharyngiomas, especially in younger patients, has shifted from the aggressive attempt of radical resection to a more conservative and individualized approach via a planned subtotal resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, aimed at preserving functional outcomes and minimizing surgery-related morbidity. Whenever gross total removal is not safely feasible, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have gained an increasingly important role to manage tumor residual or recurrence. The role of intracavitary therapies, including antineoplastic drugs or sealed radioactive sources, is predominantly limited to monocystic craniopharyngiomas as secondary therapeutic option. Novel findings in genetic profiling of craniopharyngiomas have unfold new scenarios in the development of targeted therapies based on brand-new biomolecular markers, advancing the hypothesis of introducing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in order to reduce tumor burden prior to resection. Indeed, the rarity of these neoplasms requires a multispecialty approach involving an expert team of endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-ophthalmologists, neuroradiologists, radiotherapists, and neuro-oncologists, in order to pursue a significant impact on postoperative outcomes and long-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Piloni
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Gagliardi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Bailo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Losa
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Boari
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfio Spina
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hong CS, Omay SB. The Role of Surgical Approaches in the Multi-Modal Management of Adult Craniopharyngiomas. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:1408-1421. [PMID: 35323318 PMCID: PMC8947636 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas are rare, benign primary brain tumors that arise from remnants of the craniopharyngeal duct epithelium within the sellar and suprasellar region. Despite their benign biology, they may cause significant morbidity, secondary to involvement of nearby eloquent neural structures, such as the pituitary gland, hypothalamus, and optic apparatus. Historically, aggressive surgical resection was the treatment goal to minimize risk of tumor recurrence via open transcranial midline, anterolateral, and lateral approaches, but could lead to clinical sequela of visual, endocrine, and hypothalamic dysfunction. However, recent advances in the endoscopic endonasal approach over the last decade have mostly supplanted transcranial surgery as the optimal surgical approach for these tumors. With viable options for adjuvant radiation therapy, targeted medical treatment, and alternative minimally invasive surgical approaches, the management paradigm for craniopharyngiomas has shifted from aggressive open resection to more minimally invasive but maximally safe resection, emphasizing quality of life issues, particularly in regards to visual, endocrine, and hypothalamic function. This review provides an update on current multi-modal approaches for craniopharyngiomas, highlighting the modern surgical treatment paradigm for this disease entity.
Collapse
|
7
|
Brachytherapy in paediatric craniopharyngiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2022; 38:253-262. [PMID: 34618201 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05378-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSES Brachytherapy has been indicated as an alternative option for treating cystic craniopharyngiomas. Despite the difficulties regarding the complex nuclear infrastructure and consequent small number of brachytherapy studies, recent discoveries relating tumour characteristics to sensitivity to brachytherapy have stimulated this extensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the recent results aiming to summarise its efficacy and complications. METHODS The systematic review was structured using PRISMA statements. The MEDLINE database was systematically reviewed from March 2010 to February 2021 to identify qualified trials dealing with radioisotope brachytherapy in cystic craniopharyngiomas in the paediatric population, emphasising tumour control rates and complications. RESULTS A total of 228 individuals were analysed, of which 66 were children. The minimum average follow-up was 5 years. Considering the paediatric trials, partial and complete responses were achieved in 89% of patients with exclusively cystic lesions, compared to 58% in non-exclusively cystic lesions. The former observed progression in 3% of patients, while in the latter, 35% was reported. Visual and endocrine improvement reached 64% and 20%, respectively, in the first group, in contrast to 48% and 7% in the second group, respectively. There were similar results considering the non-exclusive paediatric series, but with less expressive numbers. CONCLUSION These results reinforce the positive impact of radioisotope brachytherapy in the treatment of predominant monocystic or multicystic craniopharyngiomas, especially in the paediatric population, grounded by impressive tumour control rates, lower morbidities and single application in the majority of the cases. In the future, specific morphological tumour characteristics might be considered for a more assertive patient selection.
Collapse
|
8
|
Aridgides P, Janssens GO, Braunstein S, Campbell S, Poppe M, Murphy E, MacDonald S, Ladra M, Alapetite C, Haas-Kogan D. Gliomas, germ cell tumors, and craniopharyngioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28401. [PMID: 32960496 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2000] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
This report summarizes the current multimodality treatment approaches for children with low- and high-grade gliomas, germinoma, and nongerminomatous germ cell tumors, and craniopharyngiomas used in the Children's Oncology Group (COG) and the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP). Treatment recommendations are provided in the context of historical approaches regarding the roles of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Future research strategies for these tumors in both COG and SIOP are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Aridgides
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13210
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, GA, 3508, The Netherlands
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Ron Conway Family Gateway Medical Building, 1825 Fourth St. 1st floor M1215, San Francisco, CA, 94115
| | - Shauna Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue / CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195
| | - Matthew Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, 1950 Circle of Hope, Radiation Oncology, 1570, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112
| | - Erin Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Mail Code CA5, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Francis H Burr Proton Therapy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114
| | - Matthew Ladra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, 401 N. Broadway, Weinberg Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21231
| | | | - Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, D1622, 450 Brookline Ave, Brookline, MA, 02215
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang EW, Zanation AM, Gardner PA, Schwartz TH, Eloy JA, Adappa ND, Bettag M, Bleier BS, Cappabianca P, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Cavallo LM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Evans JJ, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Folbe AJ, Froelich S, Gentili F, Harvey RJ, Hwang PH, Jane JA, Kelly DF, Kennedy D, Knosp E, Lal D, Lee JYK, Liu JK, Lund VJ, Palmer JN, Prevedello DM, Schlosser RJ, Sindwani R, Solares CA, Tabaee A, Teo C, Thirumala PD, Thorp BD, de Arnaldo Silva Vellutini E, Witterick I, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Snyderman CH. ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020; 9:S145-S365. [PMID: 31329374 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic skull-base surgery (ESBS) is employed in the management of diverse skull-base pathologies. Paralleling the increased utilization of ESBS, the literature in this field has expanded rapidly. However, the rarity of these diseases, the inherent challenges of surgical studies, and the continued learning curve in ESBS have resulted in significant variability in the quality of the literature. To consolidate and critically appraise the available literature, experts in skull-base surgery have produced the International Consensus Statement on Endoscopic Skull-Base Surgery (ICAR:ESBS). METHODS Using previously described methodology, topics spanning the breadth of ESBS were identified and assigned a literature review, evidence-based review or evidence-based review with recommendations format. Subsequently, each topic was written and then reviewed by skull-base surgeons in both neurosurgery and otolaryngology. Following this iterative review process, the ICAR:ESBS document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS The ICAR:ESBS document addresses the role of ESBS in primary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, intradural tumors, benign skull-base and orbital pathology, sinonasal malignancies, and clival lesions. Additionally, specific challenges in ESBS including endoscopic reconstruction and complication management were evaluated. CONCLUSION A critical review of the literature in ESBS demonstrates at least the equivalency of ESBS with alternative approaches in pathologies such as CSF rhinorrhea and pituitary adenoma as well as improved reconstructive techniques in reducing CSF leaks. Evidence-based recommendations are limited in other pathologies and these significant knowledge gaps call upon the skull-base community to embrace these opportunities and collaboratively address these shortcomings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adam J Folbe
- Michigan Sinus and Skull Base Institute, Royal Oak, MI
| | | | | | - Richard J Harvey
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Charles Teo
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rachinger W, Oehlschlaegel F, Kunz M, Fuetsch M, Schichor C, Thurau S, Schopohl J, Seelos K, Tonn JC, Kreth FW. Cystic Craniopharyngiomas: Microsurgical or Stereotactic Treatment? Neurosurgery 2018; 80:733-743. [PMID: 27973392 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognosis and treatment of cystic craniopharyngiomas are poorly defined. OBJECTIVE To analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and safety profile of cystic craniopharyngiomas undergoing resection or minimally invasive drainage procedures. We compared further outcome measurements for cystic and solid tumors undergoing resection to elucidate the impact of the initial tumor composition on both PFS and the toxicity profile. METHODS All patients with craniopharyngiomas consecutively treated between 1999 and 2014 were included. A treatment decision in favor of microsurgery or stereotactic treatment was made interdisciplinarily. For stereotactic drainage, a catheter was implanted, allowing both permanent upstream (into ventricular spaces) and downstream (into prepontine cistern) drainage. Study endpoints were tumor progression, functional outcome, and treatment toxicity. Functional endocrinological and visual outcome analyses referred to data obtained preoperatively and 6 weeks after treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Prognostic factors were obtained from proportional hazard models. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients were included. The distribution of clinical and tumor-related data was well balanced among patients with solid (n = 35) and cystic (n = 44) tumors and those undergoing microsurgical or stereotactic treatment. Cystic tumors had shorter PFS (5-year PFS: 53.6% vs 66.8%, P = .10) and needed significantly more therapeutic interventions, which was independent of the initial treatment mode. The endocrinological deterioration rate was high for both solid and cystic tumors after microsurgery (59.4% and 85.7%, respectively), whereas it was significantly lower for cystic tumors undergoing stereotactic treatment (23.1%, P < .001). CONCLUSION Stereotactic bidirectional drainage of cystic craniopharyngiomas is effective and provides a better endocrinological outcome than conventional microsurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Rachinger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univer-sity, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Oehlschlaegel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univer-sity, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Kunz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univer-sity, Munich, Germany
| | - Manuel Fuetsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univer-sity, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schichor
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univer-sity, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Thurau
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Schopohl
- Medi-zinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Mu-nich, Germany
| | - Klaus Seelos
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univer-sity, Munich, Germany
| | - Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univer-sity, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Intracavitary Irradiation as a Safe Alternative for Cystic Craniopharyngiomas: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Med 2016; 2016:3601395. [PMID: 27366151 PMCID: PMC4912999 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3601395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2016] [Revised: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Craniopharyngioma treatment remains a challenge for clinicians and patients. There are many treatment alternatives; however one of them (intracavitary irradiation) seeks to control this type of benign brain tumor using minimally invasive techniques, with the specific aim of avoiding causing significant damage to important structures surrounding the sellar/suprasellar region. We present the case of a 3-year-old patient with a predominantly cystic craniopharyngioma who underwent intracavitary irradiation by stereotactic placement. Using this approach, the patient showed a successful response with remission of headaches and hydrocephalus. A reduction in the size of the cyst was achieved, without deterioration of visual fields, with no hormonal supplementation being needed, and with no evidence of focal neurological signs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ansari SF, Moore RJ, Boaz JC, Fulkerson DH. Efficacy of phosphorus-32 brachytherapy without external-beam radiation for long-term tumor control in patients with craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016; 17:439-45. [PMID: 26684761 DOI: 10.3171/2015.8.peds15317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Radioactive phosphorus-32 (P32) has been used as brachytherapy for craniopharyngiomas with the hope of providing local control of enlarging tumor cysts. Brachytherapy has commonly been used as an adjunct to the standard treatment of surgery and external-beam radiation (EBR). Historically, multimodal treatment, including EBR, has shown tumor control rates as high as 70% at 10 years after treatment. However, EBR is associated with significant long-term risks, including visual deficits, endocrine dysfunction, and cognitive decline. Theoretically, brachytherapy may provide focused local radiation that controls or shrinks a symptomatic cyst without exposing the patient to the risks of EBR. For this study, the authors reviewed their experiences with craniopharyngioma patients treated with P32 brachytherapy as the primary treatment without EBR. The authors reviewed these patients' records to evaluate whether this strategy effectively controls tumor growth, thus avoiding the need for further surgery or EBR. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of pediatric patients treated for craniopharyngioma between 1997 and 2004. This was the time period during which the authors' institution had a relatively high use of P32 for treatment of cystic craniopharyngioma. All patients who had surgery and injection of P32 without EBR were identified. The patient records were analyzed for complications, cyst control, need for further surgery, and need for future EBR. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were treated for craniopharyngioma during the study period. Nine patients (23.7%) were identified who had surgery (resection or biopsy) with P32 brachytherapy but without initial EBR. These 9 patients represented the study group. For 1 patient (11.1%), there was a complication with the brachytherapy procedure. Five patients (55.5%) required subsequent surgery. Seven patients (77.7%) required subsequent EBR for tumor growth. The mean time between the injection of P32 and subsequent treatment was 1.67 ± 1.50 years (mean ± SD). CONCLUSIONS In this small but focused population, P32 treatment provided limited local control for cyst growth. Brachytherapy alone did not reliably avert the need for subsequent surgery or EBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joel C Boaz
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Daniel H Fulkerson
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reddy GD, Hansen D, Patel A, Lin Y, Jea A, Lam S. Treatment options for pediatric craniopharyngioma. Surg Neurol Int 2016; 7:S174-8. [PMID: 27057397 PMCID: PMC4804398 DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.178570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gaddum D Reddy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Daniel Hansen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Achal Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yimo Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Andrew Jea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sandi Lam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Maarouf M, Majdoub FE, Fuetsch M, Hoevels M, Lehrke R, Berthold F, Voges J, Sturm V. Stereotactic intracavitary brachytherapy with P-32 for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children. Strahlenther Onkol 2015; 192:157-65. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0910-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
15
|
Varlotto J, DiMaio C, Grassberger C, Tangel M, Mackley H, Pavelic M, Specht C, Sogge S, Nguyen D, Glantz M, Saw C, Upadhyay U, Moser R, Yunus S, Rava P, Fitzgerald T, Glanzman J, Sheehan J. Multi-modality management of craniopharyngioma: a review of various treatments and their outcomes. Neurooncol Pract 2015; 3:173-187. [PMID: 31386091 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npv029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Craniopharyngioma is a rare tumor that is expected to occur in ∼400 patients/year in the United States. While surgical resection is considered to be the primary treatment when a patient presents with a craniopharyngioma, only 30% of such tumors present in locations that permit complete resection. Radiotherapy has been used as both primary and adjuvant therapy in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas for over 50 years. Modern radiotherapeutic techniques, via the use of CT-based treatment planning and MRI fusion, have permitted tighter treatment volumes that allow for better tumor control while limiting complications. Modern radiotherapeutic series have shown high control rates with lower doses than traditionally used in the two-dimensional treatment era. Intracavitary radiotherapy with radio-isotopes and stereotactic radiosurgery may have a role in the treatment of recurrent cystic and solid recurrences, respectively. Recently, due to the exclusive expression of the Beta-catenin clonal mutations and the exclusive expression of BRAF V600E clonal mutations in the overwhelming majority of adamantinomatous and papillary tumors respectively, it is felt that inhibitors of each pathway may play a role in the future treatment of these rare tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Varlotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Christopher DiMaio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Matthew Tangel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Heath Mackley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Matt Pavelic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Charles Specht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Steven Sogge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Dan Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Michael Glantz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Cheng Saw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Urvashi Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Richard Moser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Shakeeb Yunus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Paul Rava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Thomas Fitzgerald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Jonathan Glanzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Jonas Sheehan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yu X, Zhang J, Liu R, Wang Y, Wang H, Wang P, Chen J, Liu S. Interstitial radiotherapy using phosphorus-32 for giant posterior fossa cystic craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015; 15:510-8. [PMID: 25679384 DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.peds14302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT The treatment for giant posterior fossa cystic craniopharyngiomas remains an important challenge in neurosurgery. The authors evaluated the effects of treating 20 patients with giant posterior fossa cystic craniopharyngiomas using phosphorus-32 (P-32) interstitial radiotherapy at their hospital. METHODS The patients included 11 boys and 9 girls with an age range of 3 to 168 months. Before treatment, the tumor volumes ranged from 65 to 215 ml. The intracranial pressure was increased in 16 patients, and optic nerve damage had occurred in 18. The patients received P-32 interstitial radiotherapy following stereotactic cyst-fluid aspiration or drainage and were followed up for 7-138 months. RESULTS The treatment immediately relieved the intracranial hypertension symptoms in all patients. At the end of follow-up, imaging examinations revealed that the cystic tumors had disappeared, but some residual calcification remained in 12 patients, and had decreased by more than 75% of the initial volume in 8 patients. The damaged optic nerve recovered in 3 cases, improved in 12 cases, remained unchanged in 1 case, and was aggravated in 2 cases. No other severe complications related to surgery or interstitial radiation occurred. During the follow-up period, 7 new cysts appeared in 5 patients who had received additional interstitial radiotherapies with a dose of P-32 that was calculated using the same formula as for the initial treatment. The new tumors then disappeared in 2 patients, significantly shrank in 2 patients, and progressed in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS For treating giant posterior fossa cystic craniopharyngiomas, P-32 interstitial radiation after stereotactic cyst-fluid aspiration or drainage can achieve a high tumor control rate and has relatively satisfactory clinical effects and quality of life outcomes with few complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Navy General Hospital, Beijing
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Treuer H, Hoevels M, Luyken K, Gierich A, Hellerbach A, Lachtermann B, Visser-Vandewalle V, Ruge M, Wirths J. Voxel-based dose calculation in radiocolloid therapy of cystic craniopharyngiomas. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60:1159-70. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/1159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
18
|
Bailey S, Parkes J. Intracystic interferon therapy in childhood craniopharyngioma: who, when and how? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2015; 82:29-34. [PMID: 25059106 DOI: 10.1111/cen.12568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2014] [Revised: 06/07/2014] [Accepted: 07/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A 13-year-old male presents with fluctuating visual disturbance and headaches. Imaging reveals a significant predominantly cystic suprasellar tumour, typical of a craniopharyngioma. The patient has growth hormone deficiency but the rest of the hypothalamic/pituitary axis is intact. What are the options for therapy in 2014? Specifically, is there a role for local treatment with interferon injected into the cyst cavity? The aim of management in children with craniopharyngiomas is to reduce the impact of the tumour as much as possible, while minimising the morbidity associated with treatment. There are a number of therapeutic options available: surgery, radiotherapy and the insertion of therapeutic agents directly into the tumour cyst. The role of intracystic therapy in the form of interferon is discussed; including when to use this therapeutic option and practical details of its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Bailey
- Great North Childrens Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee CC, Yang HC, Chen CJ, Hung YC, Wu HM, Shiau CY, Guo WY, Pan DHC, Chung WY, Liu KD. Gamma Knife surgery for craniopharyngioma: report on a 20-year experience. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 Suppl:167-78. [DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.gks141411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
ObjectAlthough craniopharyngiomas are benign intracranial tumors, their high recurrence rates and intimate associations with surrounding neurovascular structures make gross tumor resection challenging. Stereotactic radiosurgery has been introduced as a valuable adjuvant therapy for recurrent or residual craniopharyngiomas. However, studies with large patient populations documenting long-term survival and progression-free survival rates are rare in the literature. The current study aims to report the long-term radiosurgical results and to define the prognostic factors in a large cohort of patients with a craniopharyngioma.MethodsA total of 137 consecutive patients who underwent 162 sessions of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) treatments at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 1993 and 2012 were analyzed. The patients' median age was 30.1 years (range 1.5–84.9 years), and the median tumor volume was 5.5 ml (range 0.2–28.4 ml). There were 23 solid (16.8%), 23 cystic (16.8%), and 91 mixed solid and cystic (66.4%) craniopharyngiomas. GKS was indicated for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. The median radiation dose was 12 Gy (range 9.5–16.0 Gy) at a median isodose line of 55% (range 50%–78%).ResultsAt a median imaging follow-up of 45.7 months after GKS, the rates of tumor control were 72.7%, 73.9%, and 66.3% for the solid, cystic, and mixed tumors, respectively. The actuarial progression-free survival rates plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method were 70.0% and 43.8% at 5 and 10 years after radiosurgery, respectively. After repeated GKS, the actuarial progression-free survival rates were increased to 77.3% and 61.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The overall survival rates were 91.5% and 83.9% at the 5- and 10-year follow-ups, respectively. Successful GKS treatment can be predicted by tumor volume (p = 0.011). Among the 137 patients who had clinical follow-up, new-onset or worsened pituitary deficiencies were detected in 11 patients (8.0%). Two patients without tumor growth had a worsened visual field, and 1 patient had a new onset of third cranial nerve palsy.ConclusionsThe current study suggests that GKS is a relatively safe modality for the treatment of recurrent or residual craniopharyngiomas, and it is associated with improved tumor control and reduced in-field recurrence rates. Acceptable rates of complications occurred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Chia Lee
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 2Department of Surgery, Hsinchu Branch, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Hsinchu
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Ching-Jen Chen
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Hsiu-Mei Wu
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
- 4Department of Radiology and
| | - Cheng-Ying Shiau
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
- 5Cancer Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and
| | - Wan-Yuo Guo
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
- 4Department of Radiology and
| | - David Hung-Chi Pan
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Wen-Yuh Chung
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Kang-Du Liu
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Craniopharyngioma: How to deal with? ROMANIAN NEUROSURGERY 2014. [DOI: 10.2478/romneu-2014-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractCraniopharyngiomas are rare, highly complex tumors with bimodal incidence in the pediatric and adult age groups. In our opinion, depending on the means possible, total microscopic ablation offers the best chance of healing, or at least prolongs the time interval of recurrences.Objective : The purpose of this paper is to add our surgical experience to in the last 11 years, in the context of the large debate from literature regarding the best therapeutically option concerning craniopharyngioma treatments.Materials and Methods : We performed a retrospective analysis of 42 consecutive patients with craniopharyngioma who underwent surgical resection by one surgeon at the Neurosurgical Department of Cluj-Napoca County Emergency Hospital between January 2002 and December 2012. We perform a systematic review of the published review on goals and techniques associated with selected surgical strategies for the treatment of CPH.Results : During this period a total of 42 patients with craniopharyngioma were treated in our institution by a single neurosurgeon, representing 12% from all cases of sellar and parasellar tumors respectively operated in last 11 years. There is a significant male preponderance. Nine patients were less than 18 years of age at admission. The patient age distribution showed a peak incidence between 10 and 15 years and another between 45 and 50 years. Considering the pediatric and adult populations together, the most common presenting symptom was visual disturbances with 60% of patients presenting in this manner, followed by severe headache in more than 50% of cases. Obstructive hydrocephalus occurred in 31% of cases. Calcifications were seen in 45% of cases, more frequently in children. All our cases underwent surgery by transcranial approach; extended frontotemporal, as the first choice, in 57% of cases. Gross total removal was achieved in over half of cases and near total resection was achieved in 40% of cases. The most frequent postoperative complications: diabetes insipidus and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. No visual impairment was observed after surgery in the patients with normal visions at presentation. Only 3 of cases primarily operated by us recurred, in an interval of one to five years. The mortality rate in our cases treated by transcranial surgery was 2% in primary cases and 7% in cases of tumor recurrence.Conclusions : Radical surgery offers the best chance for cure. Radical surgery is also associated with a higher risk of postoperative morbidity, being the reason for why many neurosurgeons recommend a subtotal resection followed by radiotherapy. In our opinion radical surgery is possible in large majority of the cases, fronto-temporal approach offering the most appropriate way to reach this objective. Every case must be judged with maximal attention based on preoperative neuroimagistic data but decisively, on intraoperative findings.
Collapse
|
21
|
Rosenfeld A, Arrington D, Miller J, Olson M, Gieseking A, Etzl M, Harel B, Schembri A, Kaplan A. A review of childhood and adolescent craniopharyngiomas with particular attention to hypothalamic obesity. Pediatr Neurol 2014; 50:4-10. [PMID: 24188907 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2013] [Revised: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 09/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although craniopharyngiomas are considered "benign" neoplasms by the World Health Organization classification, these tumors may create significant morbidity and mortality in patients. Hypothalamic obesity is a frequent complication of craniopharyngiomas and is refractory to current management options. PATIENTS/METHODS We reviewed 24 cases of craniopharyngiomas treated from 1992 to 2010 in patients <18 years of age regarding clinical presentation, neuroimaging, recurrence, morbidity, and mortality, with particular attention to hypothalamic obesity. RESULTS Our cohort conformed to published data in regard to neuroimaging characteristics, and clinical findings in the areas of endocrine, visual, neurological, neurobehavioral, and hypothalamic domains. At last follow-up, 53% of our patients were overweight (8%) or obese (46%). Only 25% of our patients had a healthy body mass index. Contrasting these data with body mass indices at diagnosis, where 21% of patients were overweight and 17% were obese, we found that there was a significant trend towards obesity over time. A significant portion of our mortality appears to be related to complications of obesity. The Native American population in Arizona appears to have a statistically greater incidence of obesity in childhood. Despite our small sample size, 75% of our Native Americans were obese at last follow-up and accounted for 50% of the mortality. CONCLUSION Hypothalamic obesity is a significant complication of craniopharyngiomas associated with increased mortality. The development of hypothalamic obesity is influenced by premorbid obesity, genetics, and therapy received, specifically radiation. Because of the intractability of hypothalamic obesity, improved understanding of neuroendocrine mechanisms, genomics, and newer antiobesity medications will be necessary to curb this significant complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Rosenfeld
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
| | - Daniel Arrington
- Department of Neurology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Jeffrey Miller
- Division of Neuro-radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Micah Olson
- Division of Endocrinology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Annie Gieseking
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Michael Etzl
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Brian Harel
- Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Cogstate Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Allen Kaplan
- Division of Child Neurology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gerganov V, Metwali H, Samii A, Fahlbusch R, Samii M. Microsurgical resection of extensive craniopharyngiomas using a frontolateral approach: operative technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 2013; 120:559-70. [PMID: 24266540 DOI: 10.3171/2013.9.jns122133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT An extensive craniopharyngioma is a tumor that extends into multiple compartments (subarachnoid spaces) and attains a size larger than 4 cm. A wide spectrum of approaches and strategies has been used for resection of such craniopharyngiomas. In this report the authors focused on the feasibility and efficacy of microsurgical resection of extensive craniopharyngiomas using a frontolateral approach. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 16 patients with extensive craniopharyngiomas who underwent operations using a frontolateral approach at one institution. The preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiological data, as well as the operative videos, were reviewed. The main focus of the review was the extent of radical tumor removal, early postoperative outcome, and approach-related complications. RESULTS Gross-total resection of craniopharyngioma was achieved in 14 (87.5%) of 16 cases. Early after surgery (within 3 months), 1 patient showed improvement in hormonal status, while in the remaining 15 patients it worsened. No major neurological morbidity was observed. Two patients experienced temporary psychotic disorders. Visual function improved in 6 patients and remained unchanged in 9. One patient experienced a new bitemporal hemianopsia. Three patients with features of short-term memory disturbances at presentation did show improvement after surgery. There were no deaths or significant approach-related morbidity in this patient series. Only 1 patient required revision surgery for a CSF leak. CONCLUSIONS The safe and simple frontolateral approach provides adequate access even to extensive craniopharyngiomas and enables their complete removal with a reasonable morbidity and approach-related complication rate.
Collapse
|
23
|
Iannalfi A, Fragkandrea I, Brock J, Saran F. Radiotherapy in Craniopharyngiomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013; 25:654-67. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2012] [Revised: 04/29/2013] [Accepted: 05/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
24
|
Sabaté-Llobera A, Rojas-Camacho J, Mora Salvadó J, Acebes Martín J, Rodríguez-Gasén A, Ramal Leiva D, Martín-Comín J. Treatment of cystic craniopharyngioma with 90Y-Colloid. Four clinical cases. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2013.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
25
|
Abstract
Data collected over a 36-year period were used to assess the value of stereotactically applied intracystic colloidal yttrium-90 (YTx) for the treatment of recurrent cystic craniopharyngiomas (CRF's). The article compares data from 95 YTx procedures carried out on 78 patients during the years 1975 and 2011, using a cumulative beta dose of 270 Gy aimed at the inner surface of the cyst wall. After YTx, the initial cyst volumes decreased an average of 74.7 %. In 54 patients, the volume reduction exceeded 80 %. In 32 patients, the cyst disappeared completely within one year. The mean survival rate following YTx was 7.5 years (range 0.7-31 years). The survival rates at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 years were 56, 29, 15, 8, 3, and 1 %, respectively. Late complications of YTx were related to the anatomical location of the cyst, either presellar or retrosellar. A presellar, that is, prechiasmatic/suprasellar localization resulted in neuro-ophthalmological complications in 5.1 % of the cases, while internal carotid artery injury accounted for 1.4 % of the complications. The treatment of retrosellar (retrochiasmatic, suprasellar) tumors may cause hypothalamic, fornix, or pontomesencephalothalamic damage, from untoward radiation to the so-called perforating arteries. This complication occurred in 5.2 % of the cases. In the multimodality management of craniopharyngioma cysts, intracavity YTx irradiation is a valuable treatment alternative despite sporadic complications arising in some surgical cases. The formula for the calculation of the dynamics of reduction of CRF's following yttrium-90 colloid brachytherapy was supported by correlating the collected data. The focus was on our minimally invasive YTx following multiple surgeries of cystic CRFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenő Viktor Julow
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. John's Hospital, Diósárok út 1-3, 1125, Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
One of the most challenging parasellar tumors, the craniopharyngioma was first described by Friedrich Albert von Zenker in 1857. Following improved understanding of pituitary gland physiology and development, Jakob Erdheim became the first to accurately describe the histopathological characteristics of a craniopharyngioma. Babinski's described the clinical presentation of these patients, with "sexual infantilism and dystrophic adiposity." The first successful surgical resection of a craniopharyngioma was performed by A. E. Halstead of Chicago of July 21st, 1909. Harvey Cushing embraced the transsphenoidal approach for the majority of his pituitary operations, but favored the transcranial approach for craniopharyngiomas. The introduction of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and microscopy significantly improved surgical outcomes. As technology improved, trans-cranial and transsphenoidal approaches were implemented depending on tumor characteristics. Adjuvant therapy, such as stereotactic radiosurgery, radioisotope brachytherapy, and intracapsular chemotherapy have improved overall tumor control rates and decreased the incidence of complications. Building on over 100 years of surgery for "the most formidable of intracranial tumors," results continue to improve. Regardless, challenges continue to remain requiring surgical insight and innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garni Barkhoudarian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 15 Francis St. PBB3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sabaté-Llobera A, Rojas-Camacho JG, Mora Salvadó J, Acebes Martín JJ, Rodríguez-Gasén A, Ramal Leiva D, Martín-Comín J. Treatment of cystic craniopharyngioma with 90Y-Colloid. Four clinical cases. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2013; 32:321-3. [PMID: 23291161 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2012.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2012] [Revised: 11/09/2012] [Accepted: 11/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Craniopharyngioma is a histologically benign and frequently cystic intracranial tumor. It may present aggressive behavior due to compression from nearby structures. Its therapeutic management is complicated because although surgery is the usual treatment of choice, it is not exempt of high morbidity and mortality and frequent tumor recurrence. In craniopharyngiomas with a significant cystic component,internal irradiation with radioactive isotopes is a therapeutic alternative to conventional treatments. We present the cases of four patients with cystic craniopharyngiomas who were treated with intracystic administration of 90Y-colloid, and their evolution after the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sabaté-Llobera
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kickingereder P, Maarouf M, El Majdoub F, Fuetsch M, Lehrke R, Wirths J, Luyken K, Schomaecker K, Treuer H, Voges J, Sturm V. Intracavitary brachytherapy using stereotactically applied phosphorus-32 colloid for treatment of cystic craniopharyngiomas in 53 patients. J Neurooncol 2012; 109:365-74. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-012-0902-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2012] [Accepted: 05/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
29
|
Bartels U, Laperriere N, Bouffet E, Drake J. Intracystic therapies for cystic craniopharyngioma in childhood. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2012; 3:39. [PMID: 22654864 PMCID: PMC3356106 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2011] [Accepted: 02/24/2012] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Craniopharyngioma of childhood are commonly cystic in nature. An intracystic catheter insertion and subsequent instillation of substances inducing cyst shrinkage seems a beneficial strategy avoiding additional morbidity in a highly vulnerable brain location. METHODS A systematic review of the medical literature was performed to identify potentially relevant, all languages articles using Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to July 2011 and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to third quarter 2011. All references were examined for relevancy. RESULTS Of 142 unique references, 71 referred to substances used for intracystic craniopharyngioma treatment. General aspects of intracystic catheter insertion as well as response rates, risks, and outcomes of children treated with intracystic radioisotopes, bleomycin, and interferon (IFN) are critically reviewed and an outline for potential future endeavors provided. CONCLUSION IFN seems currently the intracystic substance with the best benefit risk ratio. The authors advocate for consensus on prospective data collection and standardized intracystic treatment strategies to allow reliable comparisons and herewith optimize treatment and outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ute Bartels
- Paediatric Brain Tumour Program, Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenToronto, ON, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret HospitalToronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Paediatric Brain Tumour Program, Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenToronto, ON, Canada
| | - James Drake
- Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenToronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hofmann BM, Höllig A, Strauss C, Buslei R, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Results after treatment of craniopharyngiomas: further experiences with 73 patients since 1997. J Neurosurg 2011; 116:373-84. [PMID: 21942724 DOI: 10.3171/2011.6.jns081451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT The authors report surgical and endocrinological results of a series of 73 cases of craniopharyngioma that they treated surgically since 1997 to demonstrate their change in treatment strategy and its effect on outcome compared with a previous series and results reported in the literature. METHODS A total of 73 patients underwent surgery for craniopharyngiomas between May 1997 and January 2005. In patients with poor clinical or neuropsychological condition, even following pretreatment, only stereotactic cyst aspiration took place (8 cases). In the remaining patients, gross-total resection (GTR) was intended and appeared to be possible. The most frequent approaches were subfrontal (27 cases) and transsphenoidal (26 cases); in some cases, a multistep approach was used. The rate of GTR, complications, and functional outcome (comparing pre- and postoperative endocrine and neuropsychological testing) were evaluated. The mean duration of follow-up was 25.2 months. RESULTS Gross-total resection was achieved in 88.5% of cases in which a transsphenoidal approach was used and 79.5% of those in which a transcranial approach was used (85.2% of those in which a subfrontal approach was used and 72.7% of those in which a frontolateral approach was used). In the total series, GTR was achieved in 83.1% of cases (vs 49.3% in the authors' former series). The complication rate was 13.8% without any mortality. New endocrine deficits were observed more frequently in patients treated with transcranial approaches over the years (16.3%-66.7% vs 2.6%-50.0%) but were less frequent after transsphenoidal approaches (5.2%-19.2% vs 2.9%-45.7%). CONCLUSIONS Open surgery with intended total resection remains the treatment of choice in most patients. Initial stereotactic cyst aspiration or medical pretreatment to improve the patients' condition and adequate choice of surgical approach(es) are essential to achieve that goal. Nevertheless, a moderate increase in endocrinological deficits has to be accepted. The authors recommend using radiotherapy only in cases in which there are tumor remnants or disease progression after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd M Hofmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Barriger RB, Chang A, Lo SS, Timmerman RD, DesRosiers C, Boaz JC, Fakiris AJ. Phosphorus-32 therapy for cystic craniopharyngiomas. Radiother Oncol 2011; 98:207-12. [PMID: 21269713 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2009] [Revised: 03/24/2010] [Accepted: 12/02/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To examine control rates for predominantly cystic craniopharyngiomas treated with intracavitary phosphorus-32 (P-32). MATERIAL AND METHODS 22 patients with predominantly cystic craniopharyngiomas were treated at Indiana University between October 1997 and December 2006. Nineteen patients with follow-up of at least 6 months were evaluated. The median patient age was 11 years, median cyst volume was 9 ml, a median dose of 300 Gy was prescribed to the cyst wall, and median follow-up was 62 months. RESULTS Overall cyst control rate after the initial P-32 treatment was 67%. Complete tumor control after P-32 was 42%. Kaplan-Meier 1-, 3-, and 5-year initial freedom-from-progression rates were 68%, 49%, and 31%, respectively. Following salvage therapy, the Kaplan-Meier 1-, 3-, and 5-year ultimate freedom-from-progression rates were 95%, 95%, and 86%, respectively. All patients were alive at the last follow-up. Visual function was stable or improved in 81% when compared prior to P-32 therapy. Pituitary function remained stable in 74% of patients following P-32 therapy. CONCLUSIONS Intracystic P-32 can be an effective and tolerable treatment for controlling cystic components of craniopharyngiomas as a primary treatment or after prior therapies, but frequently allows for progression of solid tumor components. Disease progression in the form of solid tumor progression, re-accumulation of cystic fluid, or development of new cysts may require further radiotherapy or surgical intervention for optimal long-term disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Bryan Barriger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas have an overall incidence of 0.5-2.0 new cases per million of the population per year, and ∼30-50% of all cases represent childhood craniopharyngioma. These partly cystic embryogenic malformations of the sellar region are presumably derived from Rathke cleft epithelium. Many of the typical manifestations at primary diagnosis are nonspecific and include headache, visual impairment, polyuria and/or polydypsia, growth retardation and weight gain. Total resection is the treatment of choice in patients with favorable tumor localization, with the intention to maintain hypothalamic-pituitary and optical nerve functions. When the tumor localization is unfavorable, a limited resection followed by local irradiation is recommended. The overall survival rates are high (91-98%). High recurrence rates after complete resection and high progression rates after incomplete resection have been observed, although the risk of recurrence or progression is less after complete resection than partial resection. Irradiation of the tumor is protective and the appropriate time point of irradiation after incomplete resection is currently under investigation in a randomized trial. Long-term sequelae substantially reduce the quality of life of ∼50% of long-term survivors, notably extreme obesity owing to hypothalamic involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann L Müller
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Klinikum Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Strasse 10, 26133 Oldenburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
OBJECT Prior work by the authors' group and reports of other authors suggest worse functional outcomes and decreased survival in children with larger craniopharyngiomas. The purpose of this study was to assess the oncological, endocrinological, and functional outcomes in children who underwent radical resection of giant craniopharyngiomas (defined as 5 cm or greater in largest diameter). METHODS Between 1986 and 2006, 26 children under the age of 18 (14 boys, 12 girls; mean age 10.5 years) underwent radical resection of giant craniopharyngiomas performed by the senior author. Data were retrospectively collected to assess the outcome of surgical treatment. RESULTS Twenty (77%) of 26 patients underwent gross-total resection (GTR) confirmed by intraoperative inspection and postoperative imaging. All primary tumors (17 of 17) and 3 (33%) of 9 recurrent tumors were treated with GTR. There was no operative mortality, and 18 of 26 patients (69%) were alive at a mean follow-up of 8.9 years (median 9.3 years). Disease control was achieved in 21 (84%) of the 25 patients followed up for more than 6 months and was more successful in patients who underwent GTR (95%) than in those who underwent STR (50%, p = 0.03). New-onset diabetes insipidus (DI) occurred in 63.2% of patients (73% of patients had DI postoperatively). New or worsened deficits in visual acuity and visual fields occurred in 16% and 28%, respectively, of the 25 patients for whom postoperative visual data were available. Five patients (19%) experienced significant, permanent neurological deficits, and 5 (19%) had mild to moderate deficits. New or worsened hypothalamic disturbance occurred in 35% and 22% of patients, respectively, but obesity developed in only 15%. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective series, radical resection of giant craniopharyngiomas in children was found to lead to excellent rates of disease control with acceptable or good functional outcomes but slightly higher rates of neurological complications compared with rates in patients with smaller tumors. Radical resection is less successful in recurrent tumors that reach very large sizes, especially previously irradiated tumors, with resultant diminished survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Elliott
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Veeravagu A, Lee M, Jiang B, Chang SD. The role of radiosurgery in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28:E11. [PMID: 20367355 DOI: 10.3171/2010.2.focus09311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of craniopharyngiomas is composed of an intricate balance of multiple modalities. Resection and radiotherapy have been combined to synergistically control tumor growth while preventing undue harm to crucial neurovascular structures. Although a craniopharyngioma is a benign lesion pathologically, it may induce severe neurological injury due to its location and rate of growth. More recently, the advent of targeted, fractionated radiotherapy has allowed for more aggressive tumor control while reducing the necessity for large resections. Initial studies have demonstrated significant tumor control in patients who are treated with resection combined with radiation therapy, versus surgery alone, with a lower rate of treatment-associated neurological deficits. In this review, a detailed account of the current studies evaluating the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of craniopharyngiomas is presented. The authors also provide a short account of their experience to aid in defining the role of CyberKnife radiosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Veeravagu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yang I, Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Kaur R, Ivan ME, Aranda D, Barani IJ, Parsa AT. Craniopharyngioma: a comparison of tumor control with various treatment strategies. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28:E5. [PMID: 20367362 DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.focus09307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Craniopharyngiomas have a propensity to recur after resection, potentially causing death through their aggressive local behavior in their critical site of origin. Recent data suggest that subtotal resection (STR) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (XRT) may be an appealing substitute for gross-total resection (GTR), providing similar rates of tumor control without the morbidity associated with aggressive resection. Here, the authors summarize the published literature regarding rates of tumor control with various treatment modalities for craniopharyngiomas. METHODS The authors performed a comprehensive search of the English language literature to identify studies publishing outcome data on patients undergoing surgery for craniopharyngioma. Rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined through Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS There were 442 patients who underwent tumor resection. Among these patients, GTR was achieved in 256 cases (58%), STR in 101 cases (23%), and STR+XRT in 85 cases (19%). The 2- and 5-year PFS rates for the GTR group versus the STR+XRT group were 88 versus 91%, and 67 versus 69%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS rates for the GTR group versus the STR+XRT group were 98 versus 99%, and 98 versus 95%, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS (log-rank test) or OS with GTR (log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS Given the relative rarity of craniopharyngioma, this study provides estimates of outcome for a variety of treatment combinations, as not all treatments are an option for all patients with these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Yang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Endocrinologic, neurologic, and visual morbidity after treatment for craniopharyngioma. J Neurooncol 2010; 101:463-76. [PMID: 20535527 PMCID: PMC3024496 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-010-0265-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2010] [Accepted: 05/30/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas are locally aggressive tumors which typically are focused in the sellar and suprasellar region near a number of critical neural and vascular structures mediating endocrinologic, behavioral, and visual functions. The present study aims to summarize and compare the published literature regarding morbidity resulting from treatment of craniopharyngioma. We performed a comprehensive search of the published English language literature to identify studies publishing outcome data of patients undergoing surgery for craniopharyngioma. Comparisons of the rates of endocrine, vascular, neurological, and visual complications were performed using Pearson’s chi-squared test, and covariates of interest were fitted into a multivariate logistic regression model. In our data set, 540 patients underwent surgical resection of their tumor. 138 patients received biopsy alone followed by some form of radiotherapy. Mean overall follow-up for all patients in these studies was 54 ± 1.8 months. The overall rate of new endocrinopathy for all patients undergoing surgical resection of their mass was 37% (95% CI = 33–41). Patients receiving GTR had over 2.5 times the rate of developing at least one endocrinopathy compared to patients receiving STR alone or STR + XRT (52 vs. 19 vs. 20%, χ2P < 0.00001). On multivariate analysis, GTR conferred a significant increase in the risk of endocrinopathy compared to STR + XRT (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 2.05–5.81, P < 0.00001), after controlling for study size and the presence of significant hypothalamic involvement. There was a statistical trend towards worse visual outcomes in patients receiving XRT after STR compared to GTR or STR alone (GTR = 3.5% vs. STR 2.1% vs. STR + XRT 6.4%, P = 0.11). Given the difficulty in obtaining class 1 data regarding the treatment of this tumor, this study can serve as an estimate of expected outcomes for these patients, and guide decision making until these data are available.
Collapse
|
37
|
Kawamata T, Amano K, Aihara Y, Kubo O, Hori T. Optimal treatment strategy for craniopharyngiomas based on long-term functional outcomes of recent and past treatment modalities. Neurosurg Rev 2010; 33:71-81. [PMID: 19669813 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-009-0220-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2008] [Revised: 04/06/2009] [Accepted: 06/21/2009] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Although many authors have described treatment strategies for craniopharyngiomas, the optimal treatment of craniopharyngiomas remains controversial. This study aimed to define an adequate surgical strategy for craniopharyngiomas by reviewing the long-term functional performance of patients treated by current and past treatment modalities. Fifty-five patients with longer than 5 years of follow-up were selected for the present long-term study. The duration of follow-up ranged from 5.5 to 33 years (median, 14.8 years). There were 28 adult patients (14 males; median age, 44.4 years) and 27 children younger than 16 years of age (15 males; median age, 8.1 years). The patients were divided into the following treatment groups: single surgery (group A; n=14 multiple surgeries (group B; n=8), surgery or surgeries followed by radiotherapy (group C; n=23), surgery or surgeries (partial removal) followed by radiotherapy + additional treatments (multiple surgeries and/or re-irradiation; group D; n=10). In addition to the routine assessments of neurological, endocrine, and visual outcomes, the level of daily functioning was analyzed using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Statistical analysis of relationship between KPS score and treatment mode demonstrated that group D had a significantly lower KPS score (F=5.82, p=0.0017). Furthermore, mortality, cognitive function, and visual function were significantly better in groups A, B, and C than in group D. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that cognitive dysfunction, visual disturbance, and treatment mode were independent covariates that significantly affected postoperative KPS score. Adequate primary treatment for craniopharyngiomas is important to avoid subsequent multiple treatments. Craniopharyngiomas should be removed surgically as far as possible but without further deteriorating cognitive and visual functions, either as total resection or subtotal resection with a small remnant that is controllable by radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takakazu Kawamata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-Cho, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Craniopharyngioma is a benign tumor histopathologically and in theory should be curable by radical resection. In practice, this tumor behaves like a chronic disease, with many issues related to the effect of the tumor itself and the various treatments on the adjacent structures, such as the pituitary stalk and gland, hypothalamus, visual apparatus, and suprasellar arteries. A multimodality approach to the management of these tumors may produce the optimal outcome, balancing disease control and quality of life. In this paper, the role of intracystic therapies is reviewed, with the major focus on intracystic bleomycin and interferon-α.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Steinbok
- 1Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery; and
| | - Juliette Hukin
- 2Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, and British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cystic craniopharyngioma: trans-sphenoidal surgery and intra-cystic apposition of "bleomycin wax". Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152:293-6. [PMID: 19390776 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-009-0320-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2008] [Accepted: 11/11/2008] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current therapeutic approach to craniopharyngioma is multidisciplinary. Sub-total removal, followed by adjuvant treatments, especially in large cystic tumours, is an accepted regime reported by many authors. CASE REPORT A young patient with an intra- and suprasellar cystic craniopharyngioma was operated on via a microsurgical trans-sphenoidal approach, achieving sub-total removal and bleomycin mixed with bone wax ("bleomycin wax") applied to the capsular remnant. RESULTS Pre-operative neurological and endocrinological deficit improved after surgery. There was no evidence of tumour recurrence after a follow-up period of 5.4 years. CONCLUSIONS The intra-operative use of "bleomycin-wax" should be limited to those patients in whom intra-operative CSF fistula does not occur.
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Apart from pituitary adenomas, a number of tumours may arise from within the sella presenting a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge at a multidisciplinary specialist level. This article focus on the most commonly diagnosed non-adenomatous pituitary tumours (craniopharyngiomas, Rathke's cleft cysts and meningiomas) and provides data on their pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niki Karavitaki
- Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Old Rd, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Radiotherapy has been used as primary or adjuvant treatment in a number of non-adenomatous masses arising from within the sella. It is particularly important in the therapeutic algorithm of craniopharyngiomas and meningiomas and has also been used in chordomas/chordosarcomas and less commonly, in other lesions. This review describes the place of irradiation in the management of these masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Karavitaki
- Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Old Rd, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Takita C, Hatoum GF. CNS Tumors in Children. Radiat Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77385-6_38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
43
|
Veeravagu A, Liu Z, Niu G, Chen K, Jia B, Cai W, Jin C, Hsu AR, Connolly AJ, Tse V, Wang F, Chen X. Integrin αvβ3-Targeted Radioimmunotherapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14:7330-9. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
44
|
Gopalan R, Dassoulas K, Rainey J, Sherman JH, Sheehan JP. Evaluation of the role of Gamma Knife surgery in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 24:E5. [DOI: 10.3171/foc/2008/24/5/e5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
✓ The management of craniopharyngioma involves balancing adequate reduction in tumor volume and prevention of recurrence while minimizing damage to delicate surrounding structures. Because of the lesion's proximity to the optic chiasm and its relationship to the hypothalamic–pituitary axis, morbidity rates following treatment can be high. Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) is now being considered as a viable method of providing tumor control while ensuring minimal side effects. The authors conducted a literature review of 10 studies in which GKS was used to treat craniopharyngioma; some lesions had been previously treated and some had not. The mean marginal dose ranged from 5 to 16.4 Gy (mean 12.3 Gy). Tumor control was achieved in 75% of cases overall and varied with tumor subtype (cystic, solid, mixed). Control was seen in 90% of solid, 80% of cystic, and 59% of mixed tumors. The overall morbidity rate resulting from radiosurgery was 4% and the overall mortality rate was 0.5%. These results suggest that GKS may provide a favorable benefit-to-risk profile for many patients with craniopharyngiomas.
Collapse
|