Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: current principles, expanding indications and opportunities for multidisciplinary care

The management of brain metastases is challenging and should ideally be coordinated through a multidisciplinary approach. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been the cornerstone of management for most patients with oligometastatic central nervous system involvement (one to four brain metastases), and several technological and therapeutic advances over the past decade have broadened the indications for SRS to include polymetastatic central nervous system involvement (>4 brain metastases), preoperative application and fractionated SRS, as well as combinatorial approaches with targeted therapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. For example, improved imaging and frameless head-immobilization technologies have facilitated fractionated SRS for large brain metastases or postsurgical cavities, or lesions in proximity to organs at risk. However, these opportunities come with new challenges and questions, including the implications of tumour histology as well as the role and sequencing of concurrent systemic treatments. In this Review, we discuss these advances and associated challenges in the context of ongoing clinical trials, with insights from a global group of experts, including recommendations for current clinical practice and future investigations. The updates provided herein are meaningful for all practitioners in clinical oncology.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy for intracranial metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Brain metastasis has a negative influence on the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. Conventionally, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was favored as the standard treatment for brain metastases. However, it has been linked to a significant decline in neuro-cognitive function and poor quality of life. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently gained prominence as an alternative modality, considering that it provides targeted high-dose radiation while minimizing adverse effects. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of SRS versus WBRT in patients with intracranial metastases.

Methods

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, through July 2024, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles comparing WBRT and SRS in patients with intracranial metastases. Outcomes included local and distant recurrence, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and survival. We also used a random-effect model to perform a meta-analysis.

Results

The findings revealed no significant differences in local (risk ratio [RR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.46, 1.06]) or distant recurrence rates (RR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.54, 1.28], P = 0.41) between WBRT and SRS. However, SRS was associated with a greater risk of post-radiation LMD (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.09, 95% CI [1.47, 6.49], P = 0.003). Survival rates at 1 year (RR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.83, 1.29], P = 0.76) and 5 years (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.39, 2.04], P = 0.78) demonstrated no significant differences.

Conclusion

SRS and WBRT exhibited similar recurrence rates and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 5 years, with WBRT being more effective in managing post-radiation LMD. SRS patients, on the other hand, had longer OS when measured in months.

Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review

The mechanisms underlying breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) development are complex, and its clinical presentation varies depending on the number, location, and size of brain metastases. Common symptoms include headache, neurologic deficits, and seizures. Diagnosis of BCBM typically relies on neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. Local therapies, such as surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, can be used to control tumor growth and relieve symptoms. Whole-brain radiotherapy has been a mainstay of treatment for BCBM, but its use has been associated with cognitive decline. Systemic therapy with chemotherapy and targeted agents plays an increasingly important role in the management of BCBM. Novel agents, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have shown promising results in improving survival for patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative BCBM. This comprehensive review synthesizes current knowledge, clinical insights, and evolving paradigms to provide a robust understanding and roadmap for optimizing the diagnosis and management of BCBM.

Safety and Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with 15 or more Brain Metastases

Background

Current standard of care treatment for patients with ≥15 brain metastases (BM) is whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), despite poor neurocognitive outcomes. We analyzed our institutional experience of treating these patients with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), with the aim of evaluating safety, cognitive outcomes, and survival metrics.

Methods

Patients who received SRS for ≥15 BMs in 1 to 5 fractions from 2014 to 2022 were included. Cognitive outcomes were objectively evaluated using serial Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and log-rank test for intergroup comparisons.

Results

Overall, 118 patients underwent 124 courses of LINAC-based SRS. The median number of lesions treated per course was 20 (range, 15-94). Most patients received fractionated SRS to a dose of 24 Gy in 3 fractions (81.5%). At the time of SRS, 19.4% patients had received prior WBRT, and 24.2% had received prior SRS. The rate of any grade radiation necrosis (RN) and grade ≥3 RN were 15.3% and 3.2%, respectively. When evaluating longitudinal PROMIS score trends, 25 of 31 patients had a stable/improved PROMIS score. Patients who did not receive prior brain RT had a longer median survival (7.4 months vs 4.6 months, P = .034). The 12m local control was 97.6%, and the cumulative incidence of distant intracranial failure, with death as a competing event, was 46% (95% CI, 36%, 55%). One year freedom from neurologic death, leptomeningeal disease, and salvage WBRT were 89%, 94.6%, and 84%, respectively.

Conclusion

We present here one of the largest studies evaluating SRS for patients with ≥15 BMs. SRS was safe, had favorable cognitive outcomes, and had comparable survival outcomes to contemporary studies evaluating WBRT in this population. Treatment-naïve patients had a median survival of >6 months, long enough to benefit from cognitive sparing with SRS. Our study supports randomized studies comparing SRS and hippocampal avoidance WBRT approaches for these patients.

Improved outcomes for triple negative breast cancer brain metastases patients after stereotactic radiosurgery and new systemic approaches

PURPOSE

Although ongoing studies are assessing the efficacy of new systemic therapies for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the overwhelming majority have excluded patients with brain metastases (BM). Therefore, we aim to characterize systemic therapies and outcomes in a cohort of patients with TNBC and BM managed with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and delineate predictors of increased survival.

METHODS

We used our prospective patient registry to evaluate data from 2012 to 2023. We included patients who received SRS for TNBC-BM. A competing risk analysis was conducted to assess local and distant control.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with 262 tumors were included. The median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% CI 13-19 months). Predictors of increased OS after initial SRS include Breast GPA score > 1 (p < 0.001) and use of immunotherapy such as pembrolizumab (p = 0.011). The median time on immunotherapy was 8 months (IQR 4.4, 11.2). The median time to new CNS lesions after the first SRS treatment was 17 months (95% CI 12-22). The cumulative rate for development of new CNS metastases after initial SRS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 23%, 40%, and 70%, respectively. Thirty patients (70%) underwent multiple SRS treatments, with a median time of 5 months (95% CI 0.59-9.4 months) for the appearance of new CNS metastases after second SRS treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

TNBC patients with BM can achieve longer survival than might have been previously anticipated with median survival now surpassing one year. The use of immunotherapy is associated with increased median OS of 23 months.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison of survival between <5 and ≥5 metastases

Background

Current evidence‐based guidelines support stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with up to four brain metastases (BMs). However, debate continues about how many tumors may be treated by SRS alone.

Methods

This retrospective study included non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with BMs treated with gamma knife as the initial treatment for cerebral lesions. The patients were followed up to obtain their survival information. The outcomes were statistically analyzed to compare the differences in survival between the <5 BMs and ≥5 BMs groups and to identify prognostic factors.

Results

A total of 77 patients were divided into two groups (54 patients with <5 BMs and 23 patients with ≥5 BMs). The median overall survival (OS) was 18.3 months in the <5 BMs group and 17.7 months in the ≥5 BMs group. The median intracranial progression‐free survival (IPFS) was 9.0 months in the <5 BMs group and 9.9 months in the ≥5 BMs group. There was no significant difference in OS and IPFS between the two groups. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that adenocarcinoma, controlled primary cancer, higher Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and salvage treatment were independent prognostic factors favoring longer OS.

Conclusion

SRS alone as the initial treatment for NSCLC patients with more than four BMs was non‐inferior to SRS for those with one to four BMs in terms of OS and IPFS.

Survival in patients with carcinomas presenting with bone metastasis at diagnosis: a SEER population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Carcinoma metastasis to bone is a common reason for consultation to orthopedic surgeons. The presence of bone metastases (BM) is usually associated with poor prognosis which is worsened in the presence of synchronous metastases. The purpose of this study was to: (1) identify the most common carcinomas presenting with BM at diagnosis, to (2) analyze their survival, and (3) compare this against the survival of patients with additional synchronous metastasis based on a large population analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with carcinoma between January 2010 and December 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The most common carcinomas presenting with BM at diagnosis were identified. Survival based on the presence of BM and synchronous metastases (lung, brain, liver, lymph nodes) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Five-year survival (%) stratified by carcinoma type was calculated. Hazard ratio (HR) for mortality comparing isolated BM to other synchronous metastases was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 4.85% of patients (98,606/2,035,204) with carcinoma presented with BM at diagnosis, most commonly from a lung primary. Five-year survival with isolated BM was lowest in patients with pancreatic carcinoma (5.8%, 95% CI 3.0-9.9%), and highest in patients with breast carcinoma (41.1%, 95% CI 38.6-43.5%). Synchronous metastases increased significantly the risk of mortality within the majority of carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

BM at diagnosis has a poor prognosis which is worsened if synchronous metastases are present; a fact to consider when planning orthopedic interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Tumor Primary Site and Histology Subtypes Role in Radiotherapeutic Management of Brain Metastases

Randomized controlled trials have failed to report any survival advantage for WBRT combined with SRS in the management of brain metastases, despite the enhanced local and distant control in comparison to each treatment alone. Literature review have revealed important role of primary histology of the tumor when dealing with brain metastases. NSCLC responds better to combined approach even when there was only single brain metastasis present while breast cancer has registered better survival with SRS alone probably due to better response of primary tumor to advancement in surgical and chemotherapeutic agents. Furthermore, mutation status (EGFR/ALK) in lung cancer and receptor status (ER/PR/HER2) in breast cancer also exhibit diversity in their response to radiotherapy. Radioresistant tumors like renal cell carcinoma and melanoma brain metastases have achieved better results when treated with SRS alone. Secondly, single brain metastasis may benefit from local and distant brain control achieved with combined treatment. These diverse outcomes suggest a primary histology-based analysis of the radiotherapy regimens (WBRT, SRS, or their combination) would more ideally establish the role of radiotherapy in the management of brain metastases. Molecularly targeted therapeutic and immunotherapeutic agents have revealed synergism with radiation therapy particularly SRS in treating cancer patients with brain metastases. Clinical updates in this regard have also been reviewed.

Astrocytic IGFBP2 and CHI3L1 in cerebrospinal fluid drive cortical metastasis of HER2+breast cancer

The brain is often reported as the first site of recurrence among breast cancer patients overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Although most HER2+tumors metastasize to the subcortical region of the brain, a subset develops in the cortical region. We hypothesize that factors in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) play a critical role in the adaptation, proliferation, and establishment of cortical metastases. We established novel cell lines using patient biopsies to model breast cancer cortical and subcortical metastases. We assessed the localization and growth of these cells in vivo and proliferation and apoptosis in vitro under various conditions. Proteomic analysis of human CSF identified astrocyte-derived factors that support the proliferation of cortical metastases, and we used neutralizing antibodies to test the effects of inhibiting these factors both in vivo and in vitro. The cortical breast cancer brain metastatic cells exhibited greater proliferation than subcortical breast cancer brain metastatic cells in CSF containing several growth factors that nourish both the CNS and tumor cells. Specifically, the astrocytic paracrine factors IGFBP2 and CHI3LI promoted the proliferation of cortical metastatic cells and the formation of metastatic lesions. Disruption of these factors suppressed astrocyte-tumor cell interactions in vitro and the growth of cortical tumors in vivo. Our findings suggest that inhibition of IGFBP2 and CHI3LI signaling, in addition to existing treatment modalities, may be an effective therapeutic strategy targeting breast cancer cortical metastasis.

A purely functional Imaging based approach for transcortical resection of lesion involving the dominant atrium: Towards safer, imaging-guided, tailored cortico-leucotomies

BACKGROUND AND STUDY OBJECT

The Dominant Atrium (DA) is a crossroad of eloquent white matter bundles difficult to preserve with a standard "anatomical" approach. The aim of this work is to evaluate the results of a cohort of patients who underwent surgery with the aid of a purely functional MRI and DTI-based approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

43 patients suffering from lesions involving the DA have been included in the final cohort and studied in regards to quality of life (KPS); a special attention was lent on the incidence of new or worsening of preexisting neurological deficits, with a focus on motor, visual and speech disturbances after the surgical treatment. Patient, surgery and lesion-related data were recorded to identify the relationships with outcome. Eloquent areas fMRI and the course of Arcuate Fasciculus (AF), Inferior frontooccipital fasciculus (IFOF), Optic radiation (OR) and corticospinal tract (CST) have been investigated with preoperative MRI sequences and DTI reconstruction.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 43 patients, 19 males and 24 females; average age was 56.8 years. We recorded 9 transient and 3 permanent postoperative deficits, only one of those was caused by an edema interference with DTI reconstruction. Preoperative functional status, histology and volume of the lesion proved to be independent factors affecting results.

CONCLUSIONS

A purely functional surgical approach to the DA provided promising preliminary results. A direct DTI-fMRI visualization of the eloquent structures proximal to DA allows surgeon to conceive an ultra-precise and "tailored" cortico-leucotomy for an optimal exposure of the lesion.

Retrospective study of 229 surgically treated patients with brain metastases: Prognostic factors, outcome and comparison of recursive partitioning analysis and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment

Background:

Metastases are the most frequent tumors in the brain. Most often used scoring systems to predict the outcome are the RPA (Recursive Partitioning Analysis) classification and the DS-GPA (Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment) score. The goal of our study was to determine prognostic factors which influence outcome in patients who undergo surgery for brain metastases and to compare different outcome scores.

Methods:

Two hundred and twenty-nine patients who underwent surgery for brain metastases in our institution between January 2005 and December 2014 were included in the study. Patient data were evaluated retrospectively.

Results:

The mean survival time was 19.2 months (median survival time, MST: 8 months), for patients with a single metastasis (n = 149) 17.6 months (MST: 8 months), and for patients with multiple metastases (n = 80) 17.9 months (MST: 6 months). Significant influence on MST had age <65 years (9 vs. 5 months, P = 0.002), female sex (10 vs. 6 months, P < 0.001), RPA Class I and II (11 vs. 4 months, P < 0.001), Karnofsky score >70% (11 vs. 4 months, P < 0.001), and postoperative radiotherapy (8 vs. 5 months, P < 0.002). To evaluate the diagnostic power of DS-GPA and RPA score in respect of survival, two Cox regressions were modeled, where the RPA classification showed a better predictive power.

Conclusion:

Favorable factors for prolonged survival were KPS >70%, RPA Class I and II, age <65 years, female sex, a DS-GPA Score of 2.5–3 and 3.5–4, and adjuvant radiotherapy. The RPA Classification was more accurate in predicting the outcome than the DS-GPA score.

Astrocyte-induced Reelin expression drives proliferation of Her2+ breast cancer metastases

Breast cancer metastasis to the brain develops after a clinical latency of years to even decades, suggesting that colonization of the brain is the most challenging step of the metastatic cascade. However, the underlying mechanisms used by breast cancer cells to successfully colonize the brain's microenvironment remain elusive. Reelin is an archetypal extracellular glycoprotein that regulates migration, proliferation, and lamination of neurons. It is epigenetically silenced in various cancers, and its expression in multiple myelomas is linked to poor patient survival. We found that Reelin expression was low in primary breast cancer tissue. However, its expression was significantly higher in Her2⁺ breast cancers metastasizing to the brain. In particular, Reelin was highly expressed in the tumor periphery adjacent to surrounding astrocytes. This augmented Reelin expression was seen in Her2⁺ metastases, but not in triple negative (TN) primary tumors or in TN breast to brain metastasis cells co-cultured with astrocytes. Furthermore, the elevated expression was sustained in Her2⁺ cells grown in the presence of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine, indicating epigenetic regulation of Reelin expression. The relative growth and rate of spheroids formation derived from Her2⁺ primary and BBM cells co-cultured with astrocytes were higher than those of TN primary and BBM cells, and knockdown of both Reelin and Her2 suppressed the astrocyte-induced growth and spheroid forming ability of Her2⁺ cells. Collectively, our results indicate that within the neural niche, astrocytes epigenetically regulate Reelin expression and its interaction with Her2 leading to increased proliferation and survival fitness.

Incidence of seizure in adult patients with intracranial metastatic disease

Seizures have considerable impact on a patient's quality of life. While guidelines have been articulated to direct clinicians in their management of patients with IMD who suffer from seizure, there have been few attempts to identify the seizure rate in IMD and to determine which primary cancers may be associated with an increased seizure incidence. To determine the incidence of seizure in patients with IMD. A systematic review on seizure incidence in patients with IMD from the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) era was performed. Articles published between January 2000 and July 2014 with thirty or more consecutive adult patients were included in this study. Seizure rate was calculated using a pooled data analysis. Differences between observed and expected seizure rates between primary tumour sites were examined using the Chi square statistic and adjusted standardized residuals. The systematic search produced 18 relevant studies, with a total study population of 2012 patients. 14.6% (n = 294) had seizures. There was a significant association between primary tumour site and seizure rates. The seizure rate in patients with primary melanoma tumours was significantly greater than expected (z = 2.7; p = .006). The seizure rate in patients with primary prostate tumours was significantly lower than expected (z = -2.6; p = .008). Patients with intracranial metastasis are at significant risk for developing seizure, though at a significantly lower incidence than was estimated by studies performed during the CT era. Seizure rates appear to be greater in certain primary tumours, such as melanoma.

The evolving clinical management of cerebral metastases

Concepts in the management of brain metastases are evolving. Until recently, brain metastases have been considered as a homogenous condition, managed with whole brain radiotherapy, surgical resection for large lesions and stereotactic radiosurgery for smaller lesions. Increasingly, specific systemic medical therapies are being used to treat brain metastases based on the primary site of disease. This disease specific management is causing a change in perspective about brain metastases and has led to improved survival for patients with primary disease subtypes amenable to tailored medical therapies. We review the recent literature to present evidence for the use of subtype specific medical therapies, advances in surgical resection techniques and stereotactic radiosurgery as the primary treatment modalities. The decline in use of whole brain radiotherapy as first line treatment is also discussed. Based on the recent literature, we propose a new management algorithm to reflect the progress in available options for tailoring disease specific treatments and support the change in paradigm to consider brain metastases as separate disease states based on the primary site of cancer rather than as a homogenous entity.

Whole-brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases: what is the evidence?

The overall local treatment paradigm of brain metastases, which includes whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), continues to evolve. Local therapies play an important role in the management of brain metastases. The choice of local therapy depends on factors that involve the patient (performance status, expected survival, and age), the prior treatment history, and the tumor (type and subtype, number, size, location of metastases, and extracranial disease status). Multidisciplinary collaboration is required to facilitate an individualized plan to improve the outcome of disease in patients with this life-limiting complication. There has been concern about the neurocognitive effects of WBRT. A number of approaches that mitigate cognitive dysfunction, such as pharmacologic intervention (memantine) or a hippocampal-sparing strategy, have been studied in a prospective manner with WBRT. Although there has been an increase in the use of SRS in the management of brain metastases in recent years, WBRT retains an important therapeutic role.

Differential role of angiogenesis and tumour cell proliferation in brain metastases according to primary tumour type: analysis of 639 cases

AIM

We aimed to characterize angiogenesis and proliferation and their correlation with clinical characteristics in a large brain metastasis (BM) series.

METHODS

Ki67 proliferation index, microvascular density (MVD) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) index were determined by immunohistochemistry in BM and primary tumour specimens.

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty-nine BM specimens of 639 patients with lung cancer (344/639; 53.8%), breast cancer (105/639; 16.4%), melanoma (67/639; 10.5%), renal cell carcinoma (RCC; 52/639; 8.1%) or colorectal cancer (CRC; 71/639; 11.1%) were available. Specimens of the corresponding primary tumour were available in 113/639 (17.7%) cases. Median Ki67 index was highest in CRC BM and lowest in RCC BM (P < 0.001). MVD and HIF-1 alpha index were both highest in RCC BM and lowest in melanoma BM (P < 0.001). Significantly higher Ki67 indices, MVD and HIF-1 alpha indices in the BM than in matched primary tumours were observed for breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and CRC. Correlation of tissue-based parameters with overall survival in individual tumour types showed a favourable and independent prognostic impact of low Ki67 index [hazard ratio (HR) 1.015; P < 0.001] in NSCLC BM and of low Ki67 index (HR 1.027; P = 0.008) and high angiogenic activity (HR 1.877; P = 0.002) in RCC.

CONCLUSION

Our data argue for differential pathobiological and clinical relevance of Ki67 index, HIF1-alpha index and MVD between primary tumour types in BM patients. An independent prognostic impact of tissue-based characteristics was observed in patients with BM from NSCLC and RCC, supporting the incorporation of these tissue-based parameters into diagnosis-specific prognostic scores.

The future of targeted therapies for brain metastases

Brain metastases (BM) are an increasing challenge in the management of patients with advanced cancer. Treatment options for BM are limited and mainly focus on the application of local therapies. Systemic therapies including targeted therapies are only poorly investigated, as patients with BM were frequently excluded from clinical trials. Several targeted therapies have shown promising activity in patients with BM. In the present review we discuss existing and emerging targeted therapies for the most frequent BM primary tumor types. We focus on challenges in the conduction of clinical trials on targeted therapies in BM patients such as patient selection, combination with radiotherapy, the obstacles of the blood–brain barrier and the definition of study end points.

Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Treatment Options for Single Brain Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) occur in up to 30% of patients with cancer. Treatments include surgery, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), alone or in combination. Although guidelines exist, data to inform individualized approaches to therapy remain sparse. We sought to compare semiquantitatively the effectiveness of various modalities in the treatment of single brain metastasis.

METHODS

We performed a comparative effectiveness analysis (CEA) that integrated efficacy, cost, and quality of life (QoL) data for alternate BM treatments. Efficacy data were obtained from a comprehensive review of current literature. Cost estimates were based on publicly available data. QoL data included the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and other questionnaires. Six treatment strategies using combinations of surgery, WBRT, and SRS were compared with decision tree software.

RESULTS

The clinical efficacy, cost, and QoL effects of each strategy were scored semiquantitatively. We constructed a model to integrate individual preferences regarding the relative importance of efficacy, QoL, and cost to provide personalized rankings of the effectiveness of each strategy.

CONCLUSION

The choice of strategy must be individualized for patients with a single BM. Our CEA and decision model combines empirical data with patient priorities to produce a ranking of alternate management strategies.

Targeted and immunotherapeutic approaches in brain metastases

Brain metastases are a common and devastating complication of cancer. The approach to the management of brain metastases is often multidisciplinary and includes surgery, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and systemic therapeutic agents. Until recently, systemic therapy has had a limited role in the management of brain metastases because of a lack of activity, challenges of blood-brain barrier penetration, the heterogeneous patient population, and a heavily pretreated patient population. Advances in the understanding of the biology of brain metastases and molecularly defined disease subsets have facilitated an emerging role of novel therapeutic agents, including targeted therapies and immunotherapy, in the management of brain metastases.

Defining the optimal planning target volume in image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: results of a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To identify an optimal margin about the gross target volume (GTV) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases, minimizing toxicity and local recurrence.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Adult patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases less than 4 cm in greatest dimension, no previous brain radiation therapy, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) above 70 were eligible for this institutional review board-approved trial. Individual lesions were randomized to 1- or 3- mm uniform expansion of the GTV defined on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The resulting planning target volume (PTV) was treated to 24, 18, or 15 Gy marginal dose for maximum PTV diameters less than 2, 2 to 2.9, and 3 to 3.9 cm, respectively, using a linear accelerator-based image-guided system. The primary endpoint was local recurrence (LR). Secondary endpoints included neurocognition Mini-Mental State Examination, Trail Making Test Parts A and B, quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain), radionecrosis (RN), need for salvage radiation therapy, distant failure (DF) in the brain, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between February 2010 and November 2012, 49 patients with 80 brain metastases were treated. The median age was 61 years, the median KPS was 90, and the predominant histologies were non-small cell lung cancer (25 patients) and melanoma (8). Fifty-five, 19, and 6 lesions were treated to 24, 18, and 15 Gy, respectively. The PTV/GTV ratio, volume receiving 12 Gy or more, and minimum dose to PTV were significantly higher in the 3-mm group (all P<.01), and GTV was similar (P=.76). At a median follow-up time of 32.2 months, 11 patients were alive, with median OS 10.6 months. LR was observed in only 3 lesions (2 in the 1 mm group, P=.51), with 6.7% LR 12 months after SRS. Biopsy-proven RN alone was observed in 6 lesions (5 in the 3-mm group, P=.10). The 12-month DF rate was 45.7%. Three months after SRS, no significant change in neurocognition or quality of life was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS was well tolerated, with low rates of LR and RN in both cohorts. However, given the higher potential risk of RN with a 3-mm margin, a 1-mm GTV expansion is more appropriate.

Role of the neural niche in brain metastatic cancer

Metastasis is the relentless pursuit of cancer to escape its primary site and colonize distant organs. This malignant evolutionary process is biologically heterogeneous, yet one unifying element is the critical role of the microenvironment for arriving metastatic cells. Historically, brain metastases were rarely investigated because patients with advanced cancer were considered terminal. Fortunately, advances in molecular therapies have led to patients living longer with metastatic cancer. However, one site remains recalcitrant to our treatment efforts, the brain. The central nervous system is the most complex biologic system, which poses unique obstacles but also harbors opportunities for discovery. Much of what we know about the brain microenvironment comes from neuroscience. We suggest that the interrelated cellular responses in traumatic brain injury may guide us toward new perspectives in understanding brain metastases. In this view, brain metastases may be conceptualized as progressive oncologic injury to the nervous system. This review discusses our evolving understanding of bidirectional interactions between the brain milieu and metastatic cancer.