Long-term observation of respiratory function after unilateral phrenic nerve and multiple intercostal nerve transfer for avulsed brachial plexus injury

Intercostal Nerve Transfer for Biceps Reinnervation in Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Individual Patient Data Systematic Review using Individualized Fusion and Comparison to Supraclavicular Exploration and Nerve Grafting

Introduction

The objective of this study was to search existing literature on nerve reconstruction surgery in patients with obstetric brachial plexus palsy to determine whether treatment with supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting produced better elbow flexion outcomes compared to intercostal nerve transfer.

Methods

This study was a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Individual Patient Data guidelines. A systematic search was conducted using multiple databases. An ordinal regression model was used to analyze the effect of using supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting or intercostal nerve on elbow flexion with the two scores measured: elbow flexion Medical Research Council scores and Toronto active movements scale scores for elbow flexion.

Results

A final patient database from 6 published articles consisted of 83 supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting patients (73 patients with Medical Research Council and 10 patients with Toronto score) and 7 published articles which consisted of 131 intercostal nerve patients (84 patients with Medical Research Council and 47 patients with Toronto scores). Patients who underwent supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting presented with an average Medical Research Council score of 3.9 ± 0.72 and an average Toronto score of 6.2 ± 2.2. Patients who underwent intercostal nerve transfer presented with an average Medical Research Council score of 3.9 ± 0.71 and an average Toronto score of 6.4 ± 1.2. There was no statistical difference between supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting and intercostal nerve transfer when utilizing Medical Research Council elbow flexion scores (ordinal regression: 0.3821, standard error: 0.4590, p = 0.2551) or Toronto Active Movement Scale score for elbow flexion (ordinal regression: 0.7154, standard error: 0.8487, p = 0.2188).

Conclusion

Regardless of surgical intervention utilized (supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting or intercostal nerve transfers), patients had excellent outcomes for elbow flexion following obstetric brachial plexus palsy when utilizing Medical Research Council or Toronto scores for elbow flexion. The difference between these scores was not statistically significant.

Type of study/Level of evidence

Therapeutic Study: Investigating the Result of Treatment/level III.

Phrenic Nerve Transfer to Musculocutaneous Nerve: An Anatomical and Histological Study

BACKGROUND

To restore elbow flexor muscle function in case of traumatic brachial plexus avulsion, the phrenic nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve has become part of clinical practice. The nerve transfer can be done by means of video-assisted thoracic surgery without nerve graft or via supraclavicular approach in combination with an autograft. This study focuses on a detailed microscopic and macroscopic examination of the phrenic nerve. It will allow a better interpretation of existing clinical results and, thus, serve as a basis for future clinical studies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An anatomical study was conducted on 28 body donors of Caucasian origin (female n = 14, male n = 14). A sliding caliper and measuring tape were used to measure the diameter and length of the nerves. Sudan black staining was performed on 15 µm thick cryostat sections mounted on glass slides and the number of axons was determined by the ImageJ counting tool. In 23 individuals, the phrenic nerve could be examined on both sides. In 5 individuals, however, only one side was examined. Thus, a total of 51 nerves were examined.

RESULTS

The mean length of the left phrenic nerves (33 cm (29-38 cm)) was significantly longer compared to the mean length of the right phrenic nerves (30 cm (24-33 cm)) (p < 0.001). Accessory phrenic nerves were present in 9 of 51 (18%) phrenic nerves. The mean number of phrenic nerves axons at the level of the first intercostal space in body donors with a right accessory phrenic nerve was significantly greater compared to the mean number of phrenic nerves axons at the same level in body donors without a right accessory phrenic nerve (3145 (range, 2688-3877) vs. 2278 (range, 1558-3276)), p = 0.034. A negative correlation was registered between age and the nerve number of axons in left (0.742, p < 0.001) and right (-0.273, p = 0.197) phrenic nerves. The mean distance from the upper edge of the ventral ramus of the fourth cervical spinal nerve to the point of entrance of the musculocutaneous nerve between the two parts of the coracobrachialis muscle was 19 cm (range, 15-24 cm) for the right and 20 cm (range, 15-25 cm) for the left arm.

CONCLUSIONS

If an accessory phrenic nerve is available, it presumably should be spared. Thus, in that case, a supraclavicular approach in combination with a nerve graft would probably be of advantage.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) aided full-length phrenic nerve transfer for restoration of elbow flexion

BACKGROUND

In complete brachial plexus injury, phrenic nerve (PN) is frequently used in neurotization for elbow flexion restoration. The advancement in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) allows full-length PN dissection intrathoracically for direct coaptation to recipient without nerve graft.

PURPOSE

We report our experience in improving the surgical technique and its outcome.

METHODS

Seven patients underwent PN dissection via VATS and full-length transfer to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) or motor branch of biceps (MBB) from June 2015 to June 2018. Comparisons were made with similar group of patients who underwent conventional PN transfer.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 21.9 years. All were males involved in motorcycle accidents who sustained complete brachial plexus injury. We found the elbow flexion recovery were earlier in full-length PN transfer. However, there was no statistically significant difference in elbow flexion strength at 3 years post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

We propose full-length PN transfer for restoration of elbow flexion in patients with delayed presentation.

What is the Elbow Flexion Strength After Free Functional Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Adult Traumatic Complete Brachial Plexus Injuries?

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) in the nerve roots of C5 to T1 lead to the devastating loss of motor and sensory function in the upper extremity. Free functional gracilis muscle transfer (FFMT) is used to reconstruct elbow and shoulder function in adults with traumatic complete BPIs. The question is whether the gains in ROM and functionality for the patient outweigh the risks of such a large intervention to justify this surgery in these patients.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) After FFMT for adult traumatic complete BPI, what is the functional recovery in terms of elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and wrist extension (ROM and muscle grade)? (2) Does the choice of distal insertion affect the functional recovery of the elbow, shoulder, and wrist? (3) Does the choice of nerve source affect elbow flexion and shoulder abduction recovery? (4) What factors are associated with less residual disability? (5) What proportion of flaps have necrosis and do not reinnervate?

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia. A total of 180 patients with traumatic BPIs were treated with FFMT between 2010 and 2020, performed by a senior orthopaedic hand surgeon with 14 years of experience in FFMT. We included patients with traumatic complete C5 to T1 BPIs who underwent a gracilis FFMT procedure. Indications were total avulsion injuries and delayed presentation (>6 months after trauma) or after failed primary nerve transfers (>12 months). Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up were excluded, leaving 130 patients eligible for this study. The median postoperative follow-up period was 47 months (interquartile range [IQR] 33 to 66 months). Most were men (86%; 112 of 130) who had motorcycle collisions (96%; 125 patients) and a median age of 23 years (IQR 19 to 34 years). Orthopaedic surgeons and residents measured joint function at the elbow (flexion), shoulder (abduction), and wrist (extension) in terms of British Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength scores and active ROM. A univariate analysis of variance test was used to evaluate these outcomes in terms of differences in distal attachment to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), extensor digitorum communis and extensor pollicis longus (EDC/EPL), the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus (FDP/FPL), and the choice of a phrenic, accessory, or intercostal nerve source. We measured postoperative function with the DASH score and pain at rest with the VAS score. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to investigate what patient and injury factors were associated with less disability. Complications such as flap necrosis, innervation problems, infections, and reoperations were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median elbow flexion muscle strength was 3 (IQR 3 to 4) and active ROM was 88° ± 46°. The median shoulder abduction grade was 3 (IQR 2 to 4) and active ROM was 62° ± 42°. However, the choice of distal insertion was not associated with differences in the median wrist extension strength (ECRB: 2 [IQR 0 to 3], EDC/EPL: 2 [IQR 0 to 3], FDP/FPL: 1 [IQR 0 to 2]; p = 0.44) or in ROM (ECRB: 21° ± 19°, EDC/EPL: 21° ± 14°, FDP/FPL: 13° ± 15°; p = 0.69). Furthermore, the choice of nerve source did not affect the mean ROM for elbow flexion (phrenic nerve: 87° ± 46°; accessory nerve: 106° ± 49°; intercostal nerves: 103° ± 50°; p = 0.55). No associations were found with less disability (lower DASH scores): young age (coefficient = 0.28; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.79; p = 0.27), being a woman (coefficient = -9.4; 95% CI -24 to 5.3; p = 0.20), and more postoperative months (coefficient = 0.02; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.05]; p = 0.13). The mean postoperative VAS score for pain at rest was 3 ± 2. Flap necrosis occurred in 5% (seven of 130) of all patients, and failed innervation of the gracilis muscle occurred in 4% (five patients).

CONCLUSION

FFMT achieves ROM with fair-to-good muscle power of elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and overall function for the patient, but does not achieve good wrist function. Meticulous microsurgical skills and extensive rehabilitation training are needed to maximize the result of FFMT. Further technical developments in distal attachment and additional nerve procedures will pave the way for reconstructing a functional limb in patients with a flail upper extremity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Ventilation asymmetry, diaphragmatic mobility and exercise capacity in men with traumatic brachial plexus injury

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the repercussions of traumatic brachial plexus injury (TBPI) on diaphragmatic mobility and exercise capacity, compartmental volume changes, as well as volume contribution of each hemithorax and ventilation asymmetry during different respiratory maneuvers, and compare with healthy individuals. The velocity of shortening of the diaphragm, inspiratory, and expiratory muscles were also assessed.

PARTICIPANTS

The cross-sectional study was conducted with 40 male individuals (20 with TBPI who have not undergone nerve transfer surgery [mean age 30.1 ± 5.3] and 20 healthy paired by age and body mass index). Only patients with C8-T1 root avulsion were studied.

MAIN OUTCOME

Compartmental and hemithoracic volumes, as well as asymmetry between the affected and unaffected sides were assessed using optoelectronic plethysmography. The 6 minute walking test was performed to evaluate exercise capacity, while diaphragm mobility was assessed during quiet breathing (QB) using an ultrasound device.

RESULTS

TBPI patients with mean lesion time of 174 ± 45.24 days showed a decreased pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, and diaphragm mobility (all p < .001) compared with healthy. The pulmonary ribcage compartment of the affected side was the main contributor to the reduction in volume during inspiratory capacity, vital capacity, and inspiratory load imposition (all p < .05). This compartment also exhibited a higher ventilation asymmetry with reduced shortening velocity of the inspiratory ribcage muscles.

CONCLUSION

Compared with healthy, TBPI patients who have not undergone nerve transfer surgery present low exercise capacity and diaphragmatic mobility, as well as reduced volume of the upper ribcage compartment on the affected side that leads to reduced shortening velocity and ventilation asymmetry.

Pearls and Pitfalls of Phrenic Nerve Transfer for Shoulder Reconstruction in Brachial Plexus Injury

Objectives  The purpose of this study was to report the functional outcomes of phrenic nerve transfer (PNT) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) for shoulder reconstruction in brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients with total and C5–8 palsies, and its pulmonary complications.

Methods  Forty-four out of 127 BPI patients with total and C5–8 palsies who underwent PNT to SSN for shoulder reconstruction were evaluated for functional outcomes in comparison with other types of nerve transfers. Their pulmonary function was analyzed using vital capacity in the percentage of predicted value and Hugh-Jones (HJ) breathless classification. The predisposing factors to develop pulmonary complications in those patients were examined as well.

Results  PNT to SSN provided a better shoulder range of motion significantly as compared with nerve transfer from C5 root and contralateral C7. The results between PNT and spinal accessory nerve transfer to SSN were comparable in all directions of shoulder motions. There were no significant respiratory symptoms in majority of the patients including six patients who were classified into grade 2 HJ breathlessness grading. Two predisposing factors for poorer pulmonary performance were identified, which were age and body mass index, with cut-off values of younger than 32 years old and less than 23, respectively.

Conclusions  PNT to SSN can be a reliable reconstructive procedure in restoration of shoulder function in BPI patients with total or C5–8 palsy. The postoperative pulmonary complications can be prevented with vigilant patient selection.

Long-Term Outcome of Phrenic Nerve Transfer in Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injuries

INTRODUCTION

In brachial plexus injuries, useful recovery of arm function has been documented in most patients after phrenic nerve transfer after variable follow-up durations, but there is not much information about long-term functional outcomes. In addition, there is still some concern that respiratory complications might become manifest with aging. The aim of this study was to report the outcome of phrenic nerve transfer after a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients were reviewed and evaluated clinically. Age at surgery averaged 25.2 years and follow-up averaged 9.15 years.

RESULTS

Shoulder abduction and external rotation achieved by transfer of phrenic to axillary nerve (or posterior division of upper trunk), combined with spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer, were better than that achieved by transfer of phrenic to suprascapular nerve, combined with grafting the posterior division of upper trunk from C5, 52.3 and 45.5 degrees versus 47.5 and 39.4 degrees, respectively. There was no difference in abduction when the phrenic nerve was transferred directly to the posterior division of upper trunk or to the axillary nerve using nerve graft. Elbow flexion (≥M3 MRC) was achieved in 5 (83.3%) of 6 cases. Elbow extension M4 MRC or greater was achieved in 4 (66.6%) of 6 cases. All patients, including those who exceeded the age of 45 years and those who had concomitant intercostal nerve transfer, continued to have no respiratory symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term follow-up confirms the safety and effectiveness and of phrenic nerve transfer for functional restoration of shoulder and elbow functions in brachial plexus avulsion injuries.

Comparison Between Supraclavicular Versus Video-Assisted Intrathoracic Phrenic Nerve Section for Transfer in Patients With Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries: Case Series

BACKGROUND

The phrenic nerve has been extensively reported to be a very powerful source of transferable axons in brachial plexus injuries. The most used technique used is supraclavicular sectioning of this nerve. More recently, video-assisted thoracoscopic techniques have been reported as a good alternative, since harvesting a longer phrenic nerve avoids the need of an interposed graft.

OBJECTIVE

To compare grafting vs phrenic nerve transfer via thoracoscopy with respect to mean elbow strength at final follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted among patients who underwent phrenic nerve transfer for elbow flexion at 2 centers from 2008 to 2017. All data analysis was performed in order to determine statistical significance among the analyzed variables.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients underwent supraclavicular phrenic nerve transfer, while 28 underwent phrenic nerve transfer via video-assisted thoracoscopy. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. A statistically significant difference in elbow flexion strength recovery was observed, favoring the supraclavicular phrenic nerve section group against the intrathoracic group (P = .036). A moderate though nonsignificant difference was observed favoring the same group in mean elbow flexion strength. Also, statistical differences included patient age (P = .01) and earlier time from trauma to surgery (P = .069).

CONCLUSION

Comparing supraclavicular sectioning of the nerve vs video-assisted, intrathoracic nerve sectioning to restore elbow flexion showed that the former yielded statistically better results than the latter, in terms of the percentage of patients who achieve at least level 3 MRC strength at final follow-up. Furthermore, larger scale prospective studies assessing the long-term effects of phrenic nerve transfers remain necessary.

Intercostal nerve transfer for restoration of the diaphragm muscle function after phrenic nerve transfer in total brachial plexus avulsion

OBJECT

To determine the possibility of innervation of the diaphragm muscle using intercostal nerve after ipsilateral phrenic nerve transfer in total brachial plexus avulsion.

METHODS

Bilateral phrenic nerves and the 9th intercostal nerves were observed inside the thorax. The point where the phrenic nerve entered the diaphragm muscle (point A), the point where the 9th intercostal nerve gave rise to the cutaneous branch (point B) and crossed the posterior axillary line (point C) and the point where the posterior axillary line met the insertion of the diaphragm muscle (point D) were identified. The distances between points B and C, points A and C and from points A through D to C were recorded respectively. The 9th intercostal nerve was transferred to the distal stump of the phrenic nerve in one patient after phrenic nerve transfer to avulsed brachial plexus.

RESULTS

The mean distances between points B and C, points A and C and from points A through D to C were 12.20 ± 1.04 cm, 10.32 ± 1.02 cm and 16.43 ± 0.91 cm on the right side respectively, 11.78 ± 1.21 cm, 7.77 ± 0.85 cm and 11.74 ± 1.00 cm on the left side respectively. The 9th intercostal nerve was used to innervate the distal stump of the phrenic nerve in one patient after the phrenic nerve transfer to the avulsed brachial plexus. The diaphragm muscle function partially recovered one year after the operation.

CONCLUSION

The 9th intercostal nerve can be transferred to the distal stump of the phrenic nerve to restore the diaphragm muscle function according to the anatomical study. The movement of the diaphragm muscle was partially restored in one clinical case.

Results of Phrenic Nerve Transfer to the Musculocutaneous Nerve Using Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy in Patients with Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury: Series of 28 Cases

BACKGROUND

The phrenic nerve can be transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve using video-assisted thoracoscopy, aiming at the recovery of elbow flexion in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries. There are few scientific papers in the literature that evaluate the results of this operative technique.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate biceps strength and pulmonary function after the transfer of the phrenic nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve using video-assisted thoracoscopy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out in a sample composed of 28 patients who were victims of traumatic injury to the brachial plexus from 2008 to 2013. Muscle strength was graded using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale and pulmonary function through spirometry. Statistical tests, with significance level of 5%, were used.

RESULTS

In total, 74.1% of the patients had biceps strength greater than or equal to M3. All patients had a decrease in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s, with no evidence of recovery over time.

CONCLUSION

Transferring the phrenic nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve using video-assisted thoracoscopy may lead to an increase in biceps strength to BMRC M3 or greater in most patients. Considering the deterioration in the parameters of spirometry observed in our patients and the future effects of aging in the respiratory system, it is not possible at the moment to guarantee the safety of this operative technique in the long term.

Simultaneous Phrenic and Intercostal Nerves Transfer for Elbow Flexion and Extension in Total Brachial Plexus Root Avulsion Injury

BACKGROUND

To report the results of restoring the elbow flexion and extension in patients with total brachial root avulsion injuries by simultaneous transfer of the phrenic nerve to the nerve to the biceps and three intercostal nerves to the nerve of the long head of the triceps.

METHODS

Ten patients with total brachial root avulsion injuries underwent the spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve for shoulder reconstruction. Simultaneous transfer of the phrenic nerve to the nerve to the biceps via the sural nerve graft and three intercostal nerves to the nerve of the long head of the triceps was done for restoration of the elbow flexion and extension. Trunk flexion exercise program was used for all patients postoperatively. The mean follow up period was 36 months.

RESULTS

For elbow flexion, there were two M4, seven M3, and one M1. For elbow extension, there were three M4, four M3, two M2, and one M1. No patient demonstrated a respiratory problem clinically postoperatively. The average FVC% decreased to 61% of the predicted value at 24 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The simultaneous nerve transfer using the phrenic nerve to the nerve to the biceps and 3 intercostal nerves to the nerve of the long head of the triceps with postoperative trunk flexion exercise provide a comparable result for restoration of elbow function in total brachial plexus root avulsion injury. The patients who appear to have a respiratory problem and are unable to comply with the post-operative respiratory muscles training should be contraindicated for this simultaneous transfer.

Rectus Abdominis Motor Nerves as Donor Option for Free Functional Muscle Transfer: A Cadaver Study and Case Series

BACKGROUND

Current management of brachial plexus injuries includes nerve grafts and nerve transfers. However, in cases of late presentation or pan plexus injuries, free functional muscle transfers are an option to restore function. The purpose of our study was to describe and evaluate the rectus abdominis motor nerves histomorphologically and functionally as a donor nerve option for free functional muscle transfer for the reconstruction of brachial plexus injuries.

METHODS

High intercostal, rectus abdominis, thoracodorsal, and medial pectoral nerves were harvested for histomorphometric analysis from 4 cadavers from levels T3-8. A retrospective chart review was performed of all free functional muscle transfers from 2001 to 2014 by a single surgeon.

RESULTS

Rectus abdominis nerve branches provide a significant quantity of motor axons compared with high intercostal nerves and are comparable to the anterior branch of the thoracodorsal nerve and medial pectoral nerve branches. Clinically, the average recovery of elbow flexion was comparable to conventional donors for 2-stage muscle transfer.

CONCLUSION

Rectus abdominis motor nerves have similar nerve counts to thoracodorsal, medial pectoral nerves, and significantly more than high intercostal nerves alone. The use of rectus abdominis motor nerve branches allows restoration of elbow flexion comparable to other standard donors. In cases where multiple high intercostal nerves are not available as donors (rib fractures, phrenic nerve injury), rectus abdominis nerves provide a potential option for motor reconstruction without adversely affecting respiration.

Phrenic and intercostal nerves with rhythmic discharge can promote early nerve regeneration after brachial plexus repair in rats

Exogenous discharge can positively promote nerve repair. We, therefore, hypothesized that endogenous discharges may have similar effects. The phrenic nerve and intercostal nerve, controlled by the respiratory center, can emit regular nerve impulses; therefore these endogenous automatically discharging nerves might promote nerve regeneration. Action potential discharge patterns were examined in the diaphragm, external intercostal and latissimus dorsi muscles of rats. The phrenic and intercostal nerves showed rhythmic clusters of discharge, which were consistent with breathing frequency. From the first to the third intercostal nerves, spontaneous discharge amplitude was gradually increased. There was no obvious rhythmic discharge in the thoracodorsal nerve. Four animal groups were performed in rats as the musculocutaneous nerve cut and repaired was bland control. The other three groups were followed by a side-to-side anastomosis with the phrenic nerve, intercostal nerve and thoracodorsal nerve. Compound muscle action potentials in the biceps muscle innervated by the musculocutaneous nerve were recorded with electrodes. The tetanic forces of ipsilateral and contralateral biceps muscles were detected by a force displacement transducer. Wet muscle weight recovery rate was measured and pathological changes were observed using hematoxylin-eosin staining. The number of nerve fibers was observed using toluidine blue staining and changes in nerve ultrastructure were observed using transmission electron microscopy. The compound muscle action potential amplitude was significantly higher at 1 month after surgery in phrenic and intercostal nerve groups compared with the thoracodorsal nerve and blank control groups. The recovery rate of tetanic tension and wet weight of the right biceps were significantly lower at 2 months after surgery in the phrenic nerve, intercostal nerve, and thoracodorsal nerve groups compared with the negative control group. The number of myelinated axons distal to the coaptation site of the musculocutaneous nerve at 1 month after surgery was significantly higher in phrenic and intercostal nerve groups than in thoracodorsal nerve and negative control groups. These results indicate that endogenous autonomic discharge from phrenic and intercostal nerves can promote nerve regeneration in early stages after brachial plexus injury.

Rehabilitation, Using Guided Cerebral Plasticity, of a Brachial Plexus Injury Treated with Intercostal and Phrenic Nerve Transfers

Recovery after surgical reconstruction of a brachial plexus injury using nerve grafting and nerve transfer procedures is a function of peripheral nerve regeneration and cerebral reorganization. A 15-year-old boy, with traumatic avulsion of nerve roots C5–C7 and a non-rupture of C8–T1, was operated 3 weeks after the injury with nerve transfers: (a) terminal part of the accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve, (b) the second and third intercostal nerves to the axillary nerve, and (c) the fourth to sixth intercostal nerves to the musculocutaneous nerve. A second operation—free contralateral gracilis muscle transfer directly innervated by the phrenic nerve—was done after 2 years due to insufficient recovery of the biceps muscle function. One year later, electromyography showed activation of the biceps muscle essentially with coughing through the intercostal nerves, and of the transferred gracilis muscle by deep breathing through the phrenic nerve. Voluntary flexion of the elbow elicited clear activity in the biceps/gracilis muscles with decreasing activity in intercostal muscles distal to the transferred intercostal nerves (i.e., corresponding to eighth intercostal), indicating cerebral plasticity, where neural control of elbow flexion is gradually separated from control of breathing. To restore voluntary elbow function after nerve transfers, the rehabilitation of patients operated with intercostal nerve transfers should concentrate on transferring coughing function, while patients with phrenic nerve transfers should focus on transferring deep breathing function.

Outcome following phrenic nerve transfer to musculocutaneous nerve in patients with traumatic brachial palsy: a qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND

The phrenic nerve can be transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve in patients with traumatic brachial plexus palsy in order to recover biceps strength, but the results are controversial. There is also a concern about pulmonary function after phrenic nerve transection. In this paper, we performed a qualitative systematic review, evaluating outcomes after this procedure.

METHOD

A systematic review of published studies was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Data were extracted from the selected papers and related to: publication, study design, outcome (biceps strength in accordance with BMRC and pulmonary function) and population. Study quality was assessed using the "strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology" (STROBE) standard or the CONSORT checklist, depending on the study design.

RESULTS

Seven studies were selected for this systematic review after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. One hundred twenty-four patients completed follow-up, and most of them were graded M3 or M4 (70.1 %) for biceps strength at the final evaluation. Pulmonary function was analyzed in five studies. It was not possible to perform a statistical comparison between studies because the authors used different parameters for evaluation. Most of the patients exhibited a decrease in pulmonary function tests immediately after surgery, with recovery in the following months. Study quality was determined using STROBE in six articles, and the global score varied from 8 to 21.

CONCLUSIONS

Phrenic nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve can recover biceps strength ≥M3 (BMRC) in most patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury. Early postoperative findings revealed that the development of pulmonary symptoms is rare, but it cannot be concluded that the procedure is safe because there is no study evaluating pulmonary function in old age.

The phrenic nerve as a donor for brachial plexus injuries: is it safe and effective? Case series and literature analysis

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists surrounding the use of the phrenic nerve for transfer in severe brachial plexus injuries. The objectives of this study are: (1) to present the experience of the authors using the phrenic nerve in a single institution; and (2) to thoroughly review the existing literature to date.

METHODS

Adult patients with C5-D1 and C5-C8 lesions and a phrenic nerve transfer were retrospectively included. Patients with follow-up shorter than 18 months were excluded. The MRC muscle strength grading system was used to rate the outcome. Clinical repercussions relating to sectioning of the phrenic nerve were studied. An intense rehabilitation program was started after surgery, and compliance to this program was monitored using a previously described scale. Statistical analysis was performed with the obtained data.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included. The mean time between trauma and surgery was 5.7 months. Three-quarters of the patients had C5-D1, with the remainder C5-C8. Mean post-operative follow-up was 32.5 months A MRC of M4 was achieved in 62.7% patients, M3 21.6%, M2 in 3.9%, and M1 in 11.8%. The only significant differences between the two groups were in graft length (9.8 vs. 15.1 cm, p = 0.01); and in the rehabilitation compliance score (2.86 vs. 2.00, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of phrenic nerve transfer are predictable and good, especially if the grafts are short and the rehabilitation is adequate. It may adversely affect respiratory function tests, but this rarely correlates clinically. Contraindications to the use of the phrenic nerve exist and should be respected.

Microsurgical outcome in posttraumatic brachial plexus injuries in children

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to analyze the surgical outcomes in children (≤18 years) with brachial plexus injury operated between April 2008 and March 2012 at our center.

METHODS

All children <18 years of age admitted to our center and surgically treated with a diagnosis of posttraumatic brachial plexus injury were included in the study. The demographic details of these patients were retrieved from the computerized database of our hospital. The results were analyzed in terms of the mode of injury, type of injury, surgical procedure performed, and motor recovery after the surgery (MRC Grading). Motor recovery with MRC >3/5 was termed as good outcome.

OBSERVATIONS

A total of 33 patients were surgically treated. The mean age at presentation was 15.1 (range 4-18) years. Boys constituted 79% (n = 26) of our patient population. High-velocity injury was the commonest mode of injury. Panbrachial injury was the commonest seen in 82% (n = 27) of patients. Mean duration between injury and surgical intervention was 6 (range 2-13, SD ± 2.6) months. Majority of patients underwent neurotization procedure. Mean follow-up was 32 (range 6-51) months.

CONCLUSIONS

High-velocity trauma is the most common mode on injury. Global palsy involving all the plexal elements was present in 82% of the children. Neurotization was the most commonly performed surgical procedure. Good motor outcome (MRC grade ≥3/5) was seen in 62% of patients.