Cerebrovascular Pressure Reactivity Measures: Index Comparison and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Treated According to an Intracranial Pressure-Focused Management: Rejection of the Null Hypothesis

The aim was to investigate whether the pressure reactivity indices PRx, long-PRx (L-PRx), and pressure reactivity (PR) are interchangeable as measures of vascular reactivity, and whether they correlate with clinical outcome when an intracranial pressure (ICP)-targeted treatment regimen is applied in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Patients with TBI (n = 29) that arrived at the hospital within 24 h of injury were included. PRx and L-PRx were derived from Pearson correlations between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP over a short- and long-time interval. PR was the regression coefficient between the hourly mean values of ICP and MAP. Indices were compared to each other, parameters at admission, and outcome assessed by the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) at 6 and 12 months. PRx and L-PRx had the strongest correlation with each other (R = 0.536, p < 0.01). A correlation was also noted between L-PRx and PR (R = 0.475, p < 0.01), but not between PRx and PR. A correlation was found between age and PRx (R = 0.482, p = 0.01). No association with outcome for any of the indices was found. PRx/L-PRx and L-PRx/PR were moderately correlated with each other. Age was associated with PRx. None of the indices correlated with outcome when our ICP treatment regime was applied. Part of our null hypothesis, that the three indices are associated with outcome, must be rejected. There was, however, an association between some of the indices. To further understand the relation of treatment regimes and pressure reactivity indices, a larger, randomized study is warranted.

Autoregulatory Management in Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Absolute Pressure Reactivity Index Values and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Curve Shape

The aim of this study was to investigate if the absolute pressure reactivity index (PRx) value influenced the association between cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and outcome and if the optimal CPP (CPPopt) curve shape influenced the association between deviation from CPPopt and outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI). We included 383 TBI patients treated at the neurointensive care in Uppsala between 2008 and 2018 with at least 24 h of CPP data. To determine the influence of absolute PRx values on the association between absolute CPP and outcome, the percentage of monitoring time for combinations of CPP and PRx were correlated with outcome (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS-E]) in a heatmap. To determine the association between CPP and the relatively best PRx (CPPopt), the percentage of monitoring time of ΔCPPopt (actual CPP-CPPopt) ±5 mm Hg was analyzed in relation to GOS-E. To determine the association between CPP and the relatively best PRx within a certain absolute PRx range (curve shape), both the percentage of ΔCPPopt within the absolute limits of reactivity (PRx <0.00, < 0.15, etc.) and within certain confidence intervals of PRx-deterioration (+0.025, +0.05 etc.) from CPPopt were analyzed in relation to GOS-E. The heatmap of PRx and absolute CPP versus outcome indicated that the CPP range (55-75 mm Hg) associated with favorable outcome was wider when PRx was below 0, whereas the upper CPP-threshold decreased as PRx increased. CPPopt could be calculated during 53% of the monitoring time. Higher percentage of monitoring time with ΔCPPopt ±5 mm Hg, ΔCPPopt within the reactivity-thresholds (PRx <0.30), and ΔCPPopt within the PRx-confidence interval +0.025 were all independently associated with favorable outcome in separate logistic regressions. These regressions had similar area under receiver operating curve and were not superior to a similar regression when the CPPopt-target was replaced by the percentage of monitoring time within the traditional fixed CPP-targets 60 to 70 mm Hg. Individualized CPPopt-targets exhibited a comparable outcome association as traditional CPP targets and different definitions of the best CPPopt range based on the PRx value had a limited effect on the association between deviation from CPPopt and outcome. Since CPPopt could only be calculated during half of the time, an alternative approach would be to assess the absolute PRx to anticipate a safe CPP range.

Cerebral Autoregulation-guided Management of Adult and Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury

Cerebral autoregulation (CA) plays a vital role in maintaining cerebral blood flow in response to changes in systemic blood pressure. Impairment of CA following traumatic brain injury (TBI) may exacerbate the injury, potentially impacting patient outcomes. This focused review addresses 4 key questions regarding the measurement, natural history of CA after TBI, and potential clinical implications of CA status and CA-guided management in adults and children with TBI. We examine the feasibility and safety of CA assessment, its association with clinical outcomes, and the potential for reversing deranged CA following TBI. Finally, we discuss how the knowledge of CA status may affect TBI management and outcomes.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms in vascular repair after traumatic brain injury: a narrative review

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) disrupts normal brain function and is associated with high morbidity and fatality rates. TBI is characterized as mild, moderate or severe depending on its severity. The damage may be transient and limited to the dura matter, with only subtle changes in cerebral parenchyma, or life-threatening with obvious focal contusions, hematomas and edema. Blood vessels are often injured in TBI. Even in mild TBI, dysfunctional cerebral vascular repair may result in prolonged symptoms and poor outcomes. Various distinct types of cells participate in vascular repair after TBI. A better understanding of the cellular response and function in vascular repair can facilitate the development of new therapeutic strategies. In this review, we analyzed the mechanism of cerebrovascular impairment and the repercussions following various forms of TBI. We then discussed the role of distinct cell types in the repair of meningeal and parenchyma vasculature following TBI, including endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells, pericytes, glial cells (astrocytes and microglia), neurons, myeloid cells (macrophages and monocytes) and meningeal lymphatic endothelial cells. Finally, possible treatment techniques targeting these unique cell types for vascular repair after TBI are discussed.

Autoregulatory or Fixed Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Targets in Traumatic Brain Injury: Determining Which Is Better in an Energy Metabolic Perspective

Current guidelines in traumatic brain injury (TBI) recommend a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) within the fixed interval of 60-70 mm Hg. However, the autoregulatory, optimal CPP target (CPPopt) might yield better cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulation. In this study, we investigated fixed versus autoregulatory CPP targets in relation to cerebral energy metabolism and clinical outcome after TBI. Ninety-eight non-craniectomized patients with severe TBI treated in the neurointensive care unit, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, 2008-2018, were included. Data from cerebral microdialysis (MD), intracranial pressure (ICP), pressure autoregulation, CPP and CPPopt55-15 (a variant of CPPopt based on filtered slow waves from 15-55 sec range) were analyzed the first 10 days. The good monitoring time (GMT %) below/within/above the fixed and autoregulatory CPP targets were calculated. CPPopt55-15 was >70 mm Hg 74% of the time the first 10 days. Higher GMT (%) ΔCPPopt55-15 ± 10 mm Hg correlated with lower lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR) on day 1 and lower cerebral glycerol on days 6-10, and predicted favorable clinical outcome. Higher GMT (%) CPP within 60-70 mm Hg correlated with lower cerebral glucose on days 2-10 and higher LPR on days 6-10, but predicted favorable clinical outcome. Higher GMT (%) CPP >70 mm Hg had the opposite associations; that is, with higher cerebral glucose and lower LPR, but unfavorable clinical outcome. Autoregulatory CPP targets may be beneficial, because patients with CPP values close to the optimal CPP had both better cerebral energy metabolism and better clinical outcome, but this needs to be evaluated in randomized trials.

ICU Management of Trauma Patients

OBJECTIVES

To describe the current state of the art regarding management of the critically ill trauma patient with an emphasis on initial management in the ICU.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

A PubMed literature review was performed for relevant articles in English related to the management of adult humans with severe trauma. Specific topics included airway management, hemorrhagic shock, resuscitation, and specific injuries to the chest, abdomen, brain, and spinal cord.

DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS

The basic principles of initial management of the critically ill trauma patients include rapid identification and management of life-threatening injuries with the goal of restoring tissue oxygenation and controlling hemorrhage as rapidly as possible. The initial assessment of the patient is often truncated for procedures to manage life-threatening injuries. Major, open surgical procedures have often been replaced by nonoperative or less-invasive approaches, even for critically ill patients. Consequently, much of the early management has been shifted to the ICU, where the goal is to continue resuscitation to restore homeostasis while completing the initial assessment of the patient and watching closely for failure of nonoperative management, complications of procedures, and missed injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial management of critically ill trauma patients is complex. Multiple, sometimes competing, priorities need to be considered. Close collaboration between the intensivist and the surgical teams is critical for optimizing patient outcomes.

Continuous Assessment of "Optimal" Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study of Feasibility, Reliability, and Relation to Outcome

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) between 60 and 70 mmHg in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but acknowledge that optimal CPP may vary depending on cerebral blood flow autoregulation. Previous retrospective studies suggest that targeting CPP where the pressure reactivity index (PRx) is optimized (CPP_opt) may be associated with improved recovery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study involving TBI patients who underwent PRx monitoring to assess issues of feasibility relevant to future interventional studies: (1) the proportion of time that CPP_opt could be detected; (2) inter-observer variability in CPP_opt determination; and (3) agreement between manual and automated CPP_opt estimates. CPP_opt was determined for consecutive 6-h epochs during the first week following TBI. Sixty PRx-CPP tracings were randomly selected and independently reviewed by six critical care professionals. We also assessed whether greater deviation between actual CPP and CPP_opt (ΔCPP) was associated with poor outcomes using multivariable models.

RESULTS

In 71 patients, CPP_opt could be manually determined in 985 of 1173 (84%) epochs. Inter-observer agreement for detectability was moderate (kappa 0.46, 0.23-0.68). In cases where there was consensus that it could be determined, agreement for the specific CPP_opt value was excellent (weighted kappa 0.96, 0.91-1.00). Automated CPP_opt was within 5 mmHg of manually determined CPP_opt in 93% of epochs. Lower PRx was predictive of better recovery, but there was no association between ΔCPP and outcome. Percentage time spent below CPP_opt increased over time among patients with poor outcomes (p = 0.03). This effect was magnified in patients with impaired autoregulation (defined as PRx > 0.2; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Prospective interventional clinical trials with regular determination of CPP_opt and corresponding adjustment of CPP goals are feasible, but measures to maximize consistency in CPP_opt determination are necessary. Although we could not confirm a clear association between ΔCPP and outcome, time spent below CPP_opt may be particularly harmful, especially when autoregulation is impaired.

[Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in severe diffuse axonal brain injury: the role of neuroanatomical factors]

Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow (ACBF) is a system of mechanisms for maintaining stable adequate perfusion of the brain despite changes in systemic arterial pressure. In recent years, new data on the numerous metabolic and systemic mechanisms of cerebral blood flow regulation have been obtained, but the role of neurogenic regulation has not yet been fully understood and, therefore, not considered in clinical practice.

AIM

The study aim was to assess the effect of anatomical injuries to deep brain structures on the extent and duration of ACBF abnormalities in a model of severe diffuse axonal injury (DAI).

RESULTS

The study demonstrated that brain injury in the projection of a dopaminergic structure (substantia nigra) and a cholinergic structure (nucleus basalis of Meynert region) was more common in patients with impaired ACBF and was associated with a longer duration of the impairment.

CONCLUSION

The obtained data may indicate the presence of central (neurogenic) pathways of cerebral vessel tone regulation; traumatic injury of the pathways leads to a more severe and prolonged period of impaired ACBF. Probably, injury to these regulatory structures in some patients has an indirect effect on the course of intracranial hypertension. Further experimental and clinical studies in this direction are needed to elucidate all elements of neurogenic regulation of cerebral vessel tone and ACBF mechanisms.

Management of severe traumatic brain injury (first 24hours)

The latest French Guidelines for the management in the first 24hours of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) were published in 1998. Due to recent changes (intracerebral monitoring, cerebral perfusion pressure management, treatment of raised intracranial pressure), an update was required. Our objective has been to specify the significant developments since 1998. These guidelines were conducted by a group of experts for the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société francaise d'anesthésie et de réanimation [SFAR]) in partnership with the Association de neuro-anesthésie-réanimation de langue française (ANARLF), The French Society of Emergency Medicine (Société française de médecine d'urgence (SFMU), the Société française de neurochirurgie (SFN), the Groupe francophone de réanimation et d'urgences pédiatriques (GFRUP) and the Association des anesthésistes-réanimateurs pédiatriques d'expression française (ADARPEF). The method used to elaborate these guidelines was the Grade^® method. After two Delphi rounds, 32 recommendations were formally developed by the experts focusing on the evaluation the initial severity of traumatic brain injury, the modalities of prehospital management, imaging strategies, indications for neurosurgical interventions, sedation and analgesia, indications and modalities of cerebral monitoring, medical management of raised intracranial pressure, management of multiple trauma with severe traumatic brain injury, detection and prevention of post-traumatic epilepsia, biological homeostasis (osmolarity, glycaemia, adrenal axis) and paediatric specificities.

Medical Management of the Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patient

Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a major contributor to long-term disability and a leading cause of death worldwide. Medical management of the sTBI patient, beginning with prehospital triage, is aimed at preventing secondary brain injury. This review discusses prehospital and emergency department management of sTBI, as well as aspects of TBI management in the intensive care unit where advances have been made in the past decade. Areas of emphasis include intracranial pressure management, neuromonitoring, management of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, neuroprotective strategies, prognostication, and communication with families about goals of care. Where appropriate, differences between the third and fourth editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury are highlighted.

Critical Evaluation of the Lund Concept for Treatment of Severe Traumatic Head Injury, 25 Years after Its Introduction

When introduced in 1992, the Lund concept (LC) was the first complete guideline for treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (s-TBI). It was a theoretical approach, based mainly on general physiological principles-i.e., of brain volume control and optimization of brain perfusion and oxygenation of the penumbra zone. The concept gave relatively strict outlines for cerebral perfusion pressure, fluid therapy, ventilation, sedation, nutrition, the use of vasopressors, and osmotherapy. The LC strives for treatment of the pathophysiological mechanisms behind symptoms rather than just treating the symptoms. The treatment is standardized, with less need for individualization. Alternative guidelines published a few years later (e.g., the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and European guidelines) were mainly based on meta-analytic approaches from clinical outcome studies and to some extent from systematic reviews. When introduced, they differed extensively from the LC. We still lack any large randomized outcome study comparing the whole concept of BTF guidelines with other guidelines including the LC. From that point of view, there is limited clinical evidence favoring any of the s-TBI guidelines used today. In principle, the LC has not been changed since its introduction. Some components of the alternative guidelines have approached those in the LC. In this review, I discuss some important principles of brain hemodynamics that have been lodestars during formulation of the LC. Aspects of ventilation, nutrition, and temperature control are also discussed. I critically evaluate the most important components of the LC 25 years after its introduction, based on hemodynamic principles and on the results of own an others experimental and human studies that have been published since then.

Predictors of Outcome With Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare cerebral autoregulation indices as predictors of patient outcome and their dependence on duration of monitoring.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic literature search and meta-analysis using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to October 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

We chose articles that assessed the association between cerebral autoregulation indices and dichotomized or continuous outcomes reported as standardized mean differences or correlation coefficients (R), respectively. Animal and validation studies were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors collected and assessed the data independently. The studies were grouped into two sets according to the type of analysis used to assess the relationship between cerebral autoregulation indices and predictors of outcome (standardized mean differences or R).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-three studies compared cerebral autoregulation indices and patient outcomes using standardized mean differences, and 20 used Rs. The only data available for meta-analysis were from patients with traumatic brain injury or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Based on z score analysis, the best three cerebral autoregulation index predictors of mortality or Glasgow Outcome Scale for patients with traumatic brain injury were the pressure reactivity index, transcranial Doppler-derived mean velocity index based on cerebral perfusion pressure, and autoregulation reactivity index (z scores: 8.97, 6.01, 3.94, respectively). Mean velocity index based on arterial blood pressure did not reach statistical significance for predicting outcome measured as a continuous variable (p = 0.07) for patients with traumatic brain injury. For patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, autoregulation reactivity index was the only cerebral autoregulation index that predicted patient outcome measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale as a continuous outcome (R = 0.82; p = 0.001; z score, 3.39). We found a significant correlation between the duration of monitoring and predictive value for mortality (R = 0.78; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Three cerebral autoregulation indices, pressure reactivity index, mean velocity index based on cerebral perfusion pressure, and autoregulation reactivity index were the best outcome predictors for patients with traumatic brain injury. For patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, autoregulation reactivity index was the only cerebral autoregulation index predictor of Glasgow Outcome Scale. Continuous assessment of cerebral autoregulation predicted outcome better than intermittent monitoring.

Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition

The scope and purpose of this work is 2-fold: to synthesize the available evidence and to translate it into recommendations. This document provides recommendations only when there is evidence to support them. As such, they do not constitute a complete protocol for clinical use. Our intention is that these recommendations be used by others to develop treatment protocols, which necessarily need to incorporate consensus and clinical judgment in areas where current evidence is lacking or insufficient. We think it is important to have evidence-based recommendations to clarify what aspects of practice currently can and cannot be supported by evidence, to encourage use of evidence-based treatments that exist, and to encourage creativity in treatment and research in areas where evidence does not exist. The communities of neurosurgery and neuro-intensive care have been early pioneers and supporters of evidence-based medicine and plan to continue in this endeavor. The complete guideline document, which summarizes and evaluates the literature for each topic, and supplemental appendices (A-I) are available online at https://www.braintrauma.org/coma/guidelines.

Traumatic brain injury-induced autoregulatory dysfunction and spreading depression-related neurovascular uncoupling: Pathomechanisms, perspectives, and therapeutic implications

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health problem worldwide. In addition to its high mortality (35-40%), survivors are left with cognitive, behavioral, and communicative disabilities. While little can be done to reverse initial primary brain damage caused by trauma, the secondary injury of cerebral tissue due to cerebromicrovascular alterations and dysregulation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is potentially preventable. This review focuses on functional, cellular, and molecular changes of autoregulatory function of CBF (with special focus on cerebrovascular myogenic response) that occur in cerebral circulation after TBI and explores the links between autoregulatory dysfunction, impaired myogenic response, microvascular impairment, and the development of secondary brain damage. We further provide a synthesized translational view of molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in cortical spreading depolarization-related neurovascular dysfunction, which could be targeted for the prevention or amelioration of TBI-induced secondary brain damage.

Superior Sagittal Sinus Obstruction by Giant Meningiomas: Is Total Removal Feasible?

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with microsurgical technique for patients with giant meningiomas (maximum diameter ≥7 cm) that obstruct the superior sagittal sinus (SSS).

METHODS

All patients who were preoperatively diagnosed (between 2010 and 2014) with giant meningiomas involving the SSS in Ward 10 at the Neurosurgery Department of Beijing Tiantan Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patient charts, imaging findings, and outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

The study included 6 male and 4 female patients with a mean age of 46.8 ± 10.7 years. The tumor sizes varied from 7 to 12 cm (mean, 8.8 ± 2.0 cm). All patients underwent customized craniotomies, and aggressive surgery for resection of the invaded SSS was performed. Simpson grade I removals were achieved in all cases. No cases of perioperative mortality occurred. Three patients required cranioplasty as a result of a decompressive craniectomy that was performed during the primary surgery. Histologic examinations showed 1 malignant and 9 benign meningiomas. During the follow-up period (mean, 29.0 ± 9.7 months), recurrence/progression occurred in 1 patient, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. The recent Karnofsky Performance Score was 80 ± 32.3 and was improved in 5 patients and stabilized in 3 patients. In addition, 7 patients lived independently.

CONCLUSIONS

The rigorous preservation of cortical veins, draining veins, and eloquent areas should be implemented during the resection of large tumors that obstruct the SSS. Suitable individualized approaches associated with full exposure and low cerebral perfusion pressure levels after surgery are critical for favorable results, and the reconstruction of the SSS may not be necessary.

Brain Multimodality Monitoring: Updated Perspectives

The challenges posed by acute brain injury (ABI) involve the management of the initial insult in addition to downstream inflammation, edema, and ischemia that can result in secondary brain injury (SBI). SBI is often subclinical, but can be detected through physiologic changes. These changes serve as a surrogate for tissue injury/cell death and are captured by parameters measured by various monitors that measure intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral blood flow (CBF), brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2), cerebral metabolism, and electrocortical activity. In the ideal setting, multimodality monitoring (MMM) integrates these neurological monitoring parameters with traditional hemodynamic monitoring and the physical exam, presenting the information needed to clinicians who can intervene before irreversible damage occurs. There are now consensus guidelines on the utilization of MMM, and there continue to be new advances and questions regarding its use. In this review, we examine these recommendations, recent evidence for MMM, and future directions for MMM.

Trending autoregulatory indices during treatment for traumatic brain injury

Our goal is to use automatic data monitoring for reliable prediction of episodes of intracranial hypertension in patients with traumatic brain injury. Here we test the validity of our method on retrospective patient data. We developed the Continuous Hemodynamic Autoregulatory Monitor (CHARM), that siphons and stores signals from existing monitors in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU), efficiently compresses them, and standardizes the search for statistical relationships between any proposed index and adverse events. CHARM uses an automated event detector to reliably locate episodes of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), while eliminating artifacts within retrospective patient data. A graphical user interface allowed data scanning, selection of criteria for events, and calculating indices. The pressure reactivity index (PRx), defined as the least square linear regression slope of intracranial pressure versus arterial BP, was calculated for a single case that spanned 259 h. CHARM collected continuous records of ABP, ICP, ECG, SpO2, and ventilation from 29 patients with TBI over an 18-month period. Analysis of a single patient showed that PRx data distribution in the single hours immediately prior to all 16 intracranial hypertensive events, significantly differed from that in the 243 h that did not precede such events (p < 0.0001). The PRx index, however, lacked sufficient resolution as a real-time predictor of IH in this patient. CHARM streamlines the search for reliable predictors of intracranial hypertension. We report statistical evidence supporting the predictive potential of the pressure reactivity index.

Should the neurointensive care management of traumatic brain injury patients be individualized according to autoregulation status and injury subtype?

INTRODUCTION

The status of autoregulation is an important prognostic factor in traumatic brain injury (TBI), and is important to consider in the management of TBI patients. Pressure reactivity index (PRx) is a measure of autoregulation that has been thoroughly studied, but little is known about its variation in different subtypes of TBI. In this study, we examined the impact of PRx and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) on outcome in different TBI subtypes.

METHODS

107 patients were retrospectively studied. Data on PRx, CPP, and outcome were collected from our database. The first CT scan was classified according to the Marshall classification system. Patients were assigned to "diffuse" (Marshall class: diffuse-1, diffuse-2, and diffuse-3) or "focal" (Marshall class: diffuse-4, evacuated mass lesion, and non-evacuated mass lesion) groups. 2 × 2 tables were constructed calculating the proportions of favorable/unfavorable outcome at different combinations of PRx and CPP.

RESULTS

Low PRx was significantly associated with favorable outcome in the combined group (p = 0.002) and the diffuse group (p = 0.04), but not in the focal group (p = 0.06). In the focal group higher CPP values were associated with worse outcome (p = 0.02). In diffuse injury patients with disturbed autoregulation (PRx >0.1), CPP >70 mmHg was associated with better outcome (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

TBI patients with diffuse injury may differ from those with mass lesions. In the latter higher levels of CPP may be harmful, possibly due to BBB disruption. In TBI patients with diffuse injury and disturbed autoregulation higher levels of CPP may be beneficial.

Cerebral microdialysis in traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage: state of the art

Cerebral microdialysis (CMD) is a laboratory tool that provides on-line analysis of brain biochemistry via a thin, fenestrated, double-lumen dialysis catheter that is inserted into the interstitium of the brain. A solute is slowly infused into the catheter at a constant velocity. The fenestrated membranes at the tip of the catheter permit free diffusion of molecules between the brain interstitium and the perfusate, which is subsequently collected for laboratory analysis. The major molecules studied using this method are glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate, and glycerol. The collected substances provide insight into the neurochemical features of secondary injury following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and valuable information about changes in brain metabolism within a short time frame. In this review, the authors detail the CMD technique and its associated markers and then describe pertinent findings from the literature about the clinical application of CMD in TBI and SAH.

Comparison of frequency and time domain methods of assessment of cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury

The impulse response (IR)-based autoregulation index (ARI) allows for continuous monitoring of cerebral autoregulation using spontaneous fluctuations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral flow velocity (FV). We compared three methods of autoregulation assessment in 288 traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients managed in the Neurocritical Care Unit: (1) IR-based ARI; (2) transfer function (TF) phase, gain, and coherence; and (3) mean flow index (Mx). Autoregulation index was calculated using the TF estimation (Welch method) and classified according to the original Tiecks' model. Mx was calculated as a correlation coefficient between 10-second averages of ABP and FV using a moving 300-second data window. Transfer function phase, gain, and coherence were extracted in the very low frequency (VLF, 0 to 0.05 Hz) and low frequency (LF, 0.05 to 0.15 Hz) bandwidths. We studied the relationship between these parameters and also compared them with patients' Glasgow outcome score. The calculations were performed using both cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP; suffix 'c') as input and ABP (suffix 'a'). The result showed a significant relationship between ARI and Mx when using either ABP (r=-0.38, P<0.001) or CPP (r=-0.404, P<0.001) as input. Transfer function phase and coherence_a were significantly correlated with ARI_a and ARI_c (P<0.05). Only ARI_a, ARI_c, Mx_a, Mx_c, and phase_c were significantly correlated with patients' outcome, with Mx_c showing the strongest association.

Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data

OBJECT

In severe traumatic brain injury, a universal target for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) has been abandoned. Attempts to identify a dynamic CPP target based on the patient's cerebrovascular autoregulatory capacity have been promising so far. Bedside monitoring of pressure autoregulatory capacity has become possible by a number of methods, Czosnyka's pressure reactivity index (PRx) being the most frequently used. The PRx is calculated as the moving correlation coefficient between 40 consecutive 5-second averages of intracranial pressure (ICP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) values. Plotting PRx against CPP produces a U-shaped curve in roughly two-thirds of monitoring time, with the bottom of this curve representing a CPP range corresponding with optimal autoregulatory capacity (CPPopt). In retrospective series, keeping CPP close to CPPopt corresponded with better outcomes. Monitoring of PRx requires high-frequency signal processing. The aim of the present study is to investigate how the processing of the information on cerebrovascular pressure reactivity that can be obtained from routine minute-by-minute ICP and MABP data can be enhanced to enable CPPopt recommendations that do not differ from those obtained by the PRx method, show the same associations with outcome, and can be generated in more than two-thirds of monitoring time.

METHODS

The low-frequency autoregulation index (LAx) was defined as the moving minute-by-minute ICP/MABP correlation coefficient calculated over time intervals varying from 3 to 120 minutes. The CPPopt calculation was based on LAx-CPP plots and done for time windows between 1 and 24 hours and for each LAx type. The resulting matrix of CPPopts were then averaged in a weighted manner, with the weight based on the goodness of fit of a U-shape and the lower value of the LAx corresponding to the U-bottom, to result in a final CPPopt recommendation. The association between actual CPP/CPPopt and outcome was assessed in the multicenter Brain Monitoring with Information Technology Research Group (BrainIT) database (n = 180). In the Leuven-Tübingen database (60-Hz waveform data, n = 21), LAx- and PRx-based CPPopts were compared.

RESULTS

In the BrainIT database, CPPopt recommendations were generated in 95% of monitoring time. Actual CPP being close to LAx-based CPPopt was associated with increased survival. In a multivariate model using the Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) model as covariates, the average absolute difference between actual CPP and CPPopt was independently associated with increased mortality. In the high-frequency data set no significant difference was observed between PRx-based and LAx-based CPPopts. The new method issued a CPPopt recommendation in 97% of monitoring time, as opposed to 44% for PRx-based CPPopt.

CONCLUSIONS

Minute-by-minute ICP/MABP data contain relevant information for autoregulation monitoring. In this study, the authors' new method based on minute-by-minute data resolution allowed for CPPopt calculation in nearly the entire monitoring time. This will facilitate the use of pressure reactivity monitoring in all ICUs.

Specific intensive care management of patients with traumatic brain injury: Present and future

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global problem and affects approximately 10 million peoples annually; therefore has a substantial impact on the health-care system throughout the world. In this article, we have summarized various aspects of specific intensive care management in patients with TBI including the emerging evidence mainly after the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) 2007 and also highlighted the scope of the future therapies. This review has involved the relevant clinical trials and reviews (from 1 January 2007 to 31 March 2013), which specifically discussed about the topic. Though, BTF guideline based management strategies could provide standardized protocols for the management of patients with TBI and have some promising effects on mortality and morbidity; there is still need of inclusion of many suggestions based on various published after 2007. The main focus of majority of these trials remained to prevent or to treat the secondary brain injury. The future therapy will be directed to treat injured neurons and may benefit the outcome. There is also urgent need to develop some good prognostic indicators as well.

Age-specific cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds and survival in children and adolescents with severe traumatic brain injury*

OBJECTIVES

Evidence-based traumatic brain injury guidelines support cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds for adults at a class 2 level, but evidence is lacking in younger patients. The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of age-specific cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds on short-term survival among patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

DESIGN

Institutional review board-approved, prospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

Level I or II trauma centers in New York State.

PATIENTS

Data on all patients with a postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Score less than 9 were added in the Brain Trauma Foundation prospective New York State TBI-trac database.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We calculated the survival rates and relative risks of mortality for patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on predefined age-specific cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds. A higher threshold and a lower threshold were defined for each age group: 60 and 50 mm Hg for 12 years old or older, 50 and 35 mm Hg for 6-11 years, and 40 and 30 mm Hg for 0-5 years. Patients were stratified into age groups of 0-11, 12-17, and 18 years old or older. Three exclusive groups of CPP-L (events below low cerebral perfusion pressure threshold), CPP-B (events between high and low cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds), and CPP-H (events above high cerebral perfusion pressure threshold) were defined. As an internal control, we evaluated the associations between cerebral perfusion pressure events and events of hypotension and elevated intracranial pressure. Survival was significantly higher in 0-11 and 18 years old or older age groups for patients with CPP-H events compared with those with CPP-L events. There was a significant decrease in survival with prolonged exposure to CPP-B events for the 0-11 and 18 years old and older age groups when compared with the patients with CPP-H events (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.042, respectively). There was also a significant decrease in survival with prolonged exposure to CPP-L events in all age groups compared with the patients with CPP-H events (p< 0.0001 for 0- to 11-yr olds, p = 0.0240 for 12- to 17-yr olds, and p < 0.0001 for 18-yr old and older age groups). The 12- to 17-year olds had a significantly higher likelihood of survival compared with adults with prolonged exposure to CPP-L events (< 50 mm Hg). CPP-L events were significantly related to systemic hypotension for the 12- to 17-year-old group (p = 0.004) and the 18-year-old and older group (p < 0.0001). CPP-B events were significantly related to systemic hypotension in the 0- to 11-year-old group (p = 0.014). CPP-B and CPP-L events were significantly related to elevated intracranial pressure in all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide new evidence that cerebral perfusion pressure targets should be age specific. Furthermore, cerebral perfusion pressure goals above 50 or 60 mm Hg in adults, above 50 mm Hg in 6- to 17-year olds, and above 40 mm Hg in 0- to 5-year olds seem to be appropriate targets for treatment-based studies. Systemic hypotension had an inconsistent relationship to events of low cerebral perfusion pressure, whereas elevated intracranial pressure was significantly related to all low cerebral perfusion pressure events across all age groups. This may impart a clinically important difference in care, highlighting the necessity of controlling intracranial pressure at all times, while targeting systolic blood pressure in specific instances.

Decompressive craniectomy and head injury: brain morphometry, ICP, cerebral hemodynamics, cerebral microvascular reactivity, and neurochemistry

There has been renewed interest in decompressive craniectomy as a surgical treatment for elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), although evidence-based clinical data are still lacking and some experimental results are conflicting. Ongoing clinical trials on the use of this operation after traumatic brain injury (TBI) may clarify the clinical application of this technique, however, some pathophysiological issues, such as the timing of this operation, its effect on brain edema formation, and its role for secondary brain damage, are still controversial. This review addresses recent clinical data on the influence of decompressive craniectomy on the brain pathophysiology in TBI. Decompressive craniectomy with dural augmentation enlarges intracranial space so that the swollen cerebral hemisphere could expand out of normal cranial limits, avoiding progression of brain herniation. The gain in intracranial volume results in both the improvement of cerebral compliance and a decrease in ICP; the latter favors a rise in both cerebral blood flow and cerebral microvascular perfusion, which can be accompanied by elevation in brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2) as well as the return of abnormal metabolic parameters to normal values in cases of cerebral ischemia. Enhancement of edema formation, impairment of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity, and non-restoration of brain aerobic metabolism due to metabolic crisis may occur after craniectomy and require further investigations. This review suggests that decompressive craniectomy as the sole treatment is likely to be insufficient; efforts must be made to maintain adequate brain hemodynamics, preferably coupled with brain metabolism, in addition to treating brain metabolic abnormalities, during postoperative stages.

Updates in the management of intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traumatic brain injury remains a common and often debilitating event across the world, producing significant burdens upon health and social care. Effective neurocritical care coupled with timely and appropriate neurosurgical intervention can produce significant improvements in patient outcome. There remains controversy about how best to manage intracranial pressure on the ICU; we review the recent literature addressing a number of key variables.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment of elevations in intracranial pressure can begin at the roadside and end on the ICU unit via a number of routes. Prehospital physician-led care may produce significant benefits in outcome which extend beyond airway management. Routine use of cooling worsens the respiratory outcomes without large improvement in neurological endpoints. The use of brain tissue oxygen monitoring is extending and increasingly used to guide management. Decompressive craniectomy in refractory intracranial hypertension has been associated with poor functional outcomes; a large multicentre trial is currently comparing it against barbiturate coma.

SUMMARY

The role of the neurointensivist in outcome for patients who suffer severe traumatic brain injury is key. Targeted therapies are allowing early detection and manipulation of brain ischaemia leading to more individualized treatment.

Cerebral hemodynamics: concepts of clinical importance

Cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism are frequently impaired in a wide range of neurological diseases, including traumatic brain injury and stroke, with several pathophysiological mechanisms of injury. The resultant uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and metabolism can trigger secondary brain lesions, particularly in early phases, consequently worsening the patient's outcome. Cerebral blood flow regulation is influenced by blood gas content, blood viscosity, body temperature, cardiac output, altitude, cerebrovascular autoregulation, and neurovascular coupling, mediated by chemical agents such as nitric oxide (NO), carbon monoxide (CO), eicosanoid products, oxygen-derived free radicals, endothelins, K+, H+, and adenosine. A better understanding of these factors is valuable for the management of neurocritical care patients. The assessment of both cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism in the acute phase of neurocritical care conditions may contribute to a more effective planning of therapeutic strategies for reducing secondary brain lesions. In this review, the authors have discussed concepts of cerebral hemodynamics, considering aspects of clinical importance.

Effects of hypothermia on cerebral autoregulatory vascular responses in two rodent models of traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can trigger disturbances of cerebral pressure autoregulation that can translate into the generation of secondary insults and increased morbidity/mortality. Few therapies have been developed to attenuate the damaging consequences of disturbed autoregulatory control, although some suggest that hypothermia may exert such protection. Here we reexamine this issue of traumatically induced autoregulatory disturbances and their modulation by hypothermic intervention, examining these phenomena in two different models of TBI. Adult rats were subjected to either impact acceleration injury (IAI) or lateral fluid percussion injury (LFPI) followed by the insertion of cranial windows to assess the pial arteriolar cerebral autoregulatory vascular response to the post-traumatic induction of sequential reductions of arterial blood pressure. The potential for continued pial vasodilation in response to declining blood pressure was directly measured post-injury and compared with that in injured groups subjected to 33° C of hypothermia of 1-2 h duration initiated 1 h post-injury. We observed that the TBI resulted in either impaired or abolished cerebral vascular dilation in response to the sequential declines in blood pressure. Following IAI there was a 50% reduction in the vasculature's ability to dilate in response to the induced hypotension. In contrast, following LFPI, the vascular response to hypotension was abolished both ipsilateral and contralateral to the LFPI. In animals sustaining IAI, the use of 1 h post-traumatic hypothermia preserved vascular dilation in response to declines in blood pressure in contrast to the LFPI in which the use of the same strategy afforded no improvement. However, with LFPI, the use of 2 h of hypothermia provided partial vascular protection. These results clearly illustrate that TBI can alter the cerebral autoregulatory vascular response to sequentially induced hypotensive insult, whereas the use of post-traumatic hypothermia provides benefit. Collectively, these studies also demonstrate that different animal models of TBI can evoke different biological responses to injury.