Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Asleep Single-Stage Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Operative Technique and Systematic Review

Microelectrode Recording During Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Consistently Represent Lead Trajectory

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Long-term outcomes in deep brain stimulation (DBS) depend on accuracy of lead placement. Microelectrode recording (MER) is a long-used adjunct to leverage neurophysiological information to confirm satisfactory trajectory of implanted electrodes. The goal of this study was to evaluate the consistency in which electrodes are placed in sampled microelectrode trajectories.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study using intraoperative computed tomography to measure final electrode deviation from MER probe placement during the DBS insertion targeting subthalamic nucleus. Fifteen patients had 29 DBS leads placed using MER assistance. Radial distance between the probe and the lead were measured for each patient using intraoperative imaging. In addition, the preoperative target to final lead error was measured in 14 patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus implants without the use of MER and compared with the 15 patients in which MER was used as an adjunct.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean radial target error (1.2 vs 1.0 mm, P = .156) when comparing the leads placed with or without MER assistance, respectively. The mean difference in final position of microelectrode compared with DBS lead was 0.9 ± 0.1 (range 0.4-2.0 mm). Of all MER-assisted electrodes placed, 44.8% (13) of electrode final positions radially deviated 1.0 mm or more from the MER probe.

CONCLUSION

Electrode placement may deviate significantly from MER trajectories. Given the concern that physiological data may not be representative of the final electrode trajectory, surgeons should consider using intraoperative imaging or other adjunctive techniques during DBS to confirm accuracy and satisfactory trajectory of DBS leads.

Prospective Connectomic-Based Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on accurate lead placement as well as optimization of the stimulation parameters. Although clinical software tools are now available, programming still largely relies on a monopolar review, a tedious process for both patients and programmers.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the safety and feasibility of prospective automated connectomic DBS programming (automated connectomic programming [ACP]), focusing on the recruitment of specific white matter pathways.

METHODS

After DBS implantation, a detailed connectomic DBS model in patient-specific space was developed for each study participant. A driving-force model was used to quantify pathway recruitment across 2400 different DBS settings. Optimization algorithms maximized recruitment of therapeutic pathways while minimizing recruitment of side-effect pathways. Thirteen subjects were enrolled in two study phases that compared DBS settings derived from ACP to standard clinical DBS settings.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent reprogramming with ACP (5 globus pallidus interna [GPi], 4 subthalamic nucleus [STN]). Four patients underwent initial programming with ACP (3 GPi, 1 STN). All patients tolerated ACP without persistent side effects. In the reprogramming cohort, 3 patients preferred their ACP program, and 1 patient felt it was comparable to their clinical program. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III, scores for the initial ACP cohort (3 GPi, 1 STN) improved by an average of 43.5% (40.4-52.6 ± 5.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

ACP appeared clinically safe and feasible. It provided reasonable motor improvement, which can be further optimized with subsequent clinical adjustment. Additional investigation is required to refine the optimization algorithm and to quantify the clinical benefit of ACP in a larger cohort. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Robotic-Assisted Navigation for Stereotactic Neurosurgery: A Cadaveric Investigation of Accuracy, Time, and Radiation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite frequent use, stereotactic head frames require manual coordinate calculations and manual frame settings that are associated with human error. This study examines freestanding robot-assisted navigation (RAN) as a means to reduce the drawbacks of traditional cranial stereotaxy and improve targeting accuracy.

METHODS

Seven cadaveric human torsos with heads were tested with 8 anatomic coordinates selected for lead placement mirrored in each hemisphere. Right and left hemispheres of the brain were randomly assigned to either the traditional stereotactic arc-based (ARC) group or the RAN group. Both target accuracy and trajectory accuracy were measured. Procedural time and the radiation required for registration were also measured.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the RAN group was significantly greater than that of the ARC group in both target (1.2 ± 0.5 mm vs 1.7 ± 1.2 mm, P = .005) and trajectory (0.9 ± 0.6 mm vs 1.3 ± 0.9 mm, P = .004) measurements. Total procedural time was also significantly faster for the RAN group than for the ARC group (44.6 ± 7.7 minutes vs 86.0 ± 12.5 minutes, P < .001). The RAN group had significantly reduced time per electrode placement (2.9 ± 0.9 minutes vs 5.8 ± 2.0 minutes, P < .001) and significantly reduced radiation during registration (1.9 ± 1.1 mGy vs 76.2 ± 5.0 mGy, P < .001) compared with the ARC group.

CONCLUSION

In this cadaveric study, cranial leads were placed faster and with greater accuracy using RAN than those placed with conventional stereotactic arc-based technique. RAN also required significantly less radiation to register the specimen's coordinate system to the planned trajectories. Clinical testing should be performed to further investigate RAN for stereotactic cranial surgery.