FGF5 Regulates Schwann Cell Migration and Adhesion

The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family polypeptides play key roles in promoting tissue regeneration and repair. FGF5 is strongly up-regulated in Schwann cells of the peripheral nervous system following injury; however, a role for FGF5 in peripheral nerve regeneration has not been shown up to now. In this report, we examined the expression of FGF5 and its receptors FGFR1-4 in Schwann cells of the mouse sciatic nerve following injury, and then measured the effects of FGF5 treatment upon cultured primary rat Schwann cells. By microarray and mRNA sequencing data analysis, RT-PCR, qPCR, western blotting and immunostaining, we show that FGF5 is highly up-regulated in Schwann cells of the mouse distal sciatic nerve following injury, and FGFR1 and FGFR2 are highly expressed in Schwann cells of the peripheral nerve both before and following injury. Using cultured primary rat Schwann cells, we show that FGF5 inhibits ERK1/2 MAP kinase activity but promotes rapid Schwann cell migration and adhesion via the upregulation of N-cadherin. Thus, FGF5 is an autocrine regulator of Schwann cells to regulate Schwann cell migration and adhesion.

Evaluation of two methods to isolate Schwann cells from murine sciatic nerve

BACKGROUND

Schwann cells (SC) and macrophages play key roles in the response to peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Accurate isolation of such cells is essential for further analyses that can lead to better understanding of the repair process after PNI. Separation of live SC from the injury site without culture enrichment is necessary for targeted gene expression analysis.

NEW METHODS

Two flow cytometric techniques are presented for rapid enrichment of live SC and macrophages from injured murine peripheral nerve without the need for culture.

RESULTS

SC were isolated by fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) using transgenic expression of eGFP in SC, or by exclusion of other cell types collected from the injury site.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S)

Gene expression analyses of peripheral nerve repair have commonly used whole nerve lysates. Isolating SC allows more accurate understanding of their specific role in repair. SC are commonly enriched from nerve by culture, however this changes gene expression patterns and limits the utility for transcriptomic analysis. The surface marker p75-NTR has variable expression in different SC phenotypes and during the course of injury and repair. Using p75-NTR for SC isolation might enrich only a subset of SC. More stably expressed lineage markers for SC are intracellular and not suitable for sorting for gene expression. The methods used here avoid the requirement for surface marker labeling of SC.

CONCLUSION

Gene expression analysis of sorted cells from both methods showed successful enrichment of SC. Lineage markers such as Map1b, p75-NTR and S100b were enriched in the sorted SC population. SC sorting by eGFP expression showed improved enrichment, particularly of mature myelinating genes, although this could represent sampling of a subset of SC.