1
|
Li M, Yang X, Zhang D, Tian Y, Jia ZC, Liu WH, Hao RR, Chen YS, Chen MX, Liu YG. A story of two kingdoms: unravelling the intricacies of protein phase separation in plants and animals. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2024:1-21. [PMID: 39592156 DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2024.2425989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 08/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/20/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024]
Abstract
The biomolecular condensates (BCs) formed by proteins through phase separation provide the necessary space and raw materials for the orderly progression of cellular activities, and on this basis, various membraneless organelles (MLOs) are formed. The occurrence of eukaryotic phase separation is driven by multivalent interactions from intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) and/or specific protein/nucleic acid binding domains and is regulated by various environmental factors. In plant and animal cells, the MLOs involved in gene expression regulation, stress response, and mitotic control display similar functions and mechanisms. In contrast, the phase separation related to reproductive development and immune regulation differs significantly between the two kingdoms owing to their distinct cell structures and nutritional patterns. In addition, animals and plants each exhibit unique protein phase separation activities, such as neural regulation and light signal response. By comparing the similarities and differences in the formation mechanism and functional regulation of known protein phase separation, we elucidated its importance in the evolution, differentiation, and environmental adaptation of both animals and plants. The significance of studying protein phase separation for enhancing biological quality of life has been further emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Li
- State Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, College of Life Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China
| | - Xue Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, College of Life Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China
| | - Di Zhang
- Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, and State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Yuan Tian
- State Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, College of Life Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China
- State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Subtropical Forest Biodiversity Conservation, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zi-Chang Jia
- State Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, College of Life Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China
| | - Wen-Hui Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, College of Life Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China
| | - Rui-Rui Hao
- State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Subtropical Forest Biodiversity Conservation, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yun-Sheng Chen
- Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Mo-Xian Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Subtropical Forest Biodiversity Conservation, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ying-Gao Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, College of Life Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geisler MS, Kemp JP, Duronio RJ. Histone locus bodies: a paradigm for how nuclear biomolecular condensates control cell cycle regulated gene expression. Nucleus 2023; 14:2293604. [PMID: 38095604 PMCID: PMC10730174 DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2023.2293604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Histone locus bodies (HLBs) are biomolecular condensates that assemble at replication-dependent (RD) histone genes in animal cells. These genes produce unique mRNAs that are not polyadenylated and instead end in a conserved 3' stem loop critical for coordinated production of histone proteins during S phase of the cell cycle. Several evolutionarily conserved factors necessary for synthesis of RD histone mRNAs concentrate only in the HLB. Moreover, because HLBs are present throughout the cell cycle even though RD histone genes are only expressed during S phase, changes in HLB composition during cell cycle progression drive much of the cell cycle regulation of RD histone gene expression. Thus, HLBs provide a powerful opportunity to determine the cause-and-effect relationships between nuclear body formation and cell cycle regulated gene expression. In this review, we focus on progress during the last five years that has advanced our understanding of HLB biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S. Geisler
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - James P. Kemp
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Robert J. Duronio
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tognacca RS, Kubaczka MG, Servi L, Rodríguez FS, Godoy Herz MA, Petrillo E. Light in the transcription landscape: chromatin, RNA polymerase II and splicing throughout Arabidopsis thaliana's life cycle. Transcription 2020; 11:117-133. [PMID: 32748694 DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2020.1796473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Plants have a high level of developmental plasticity that allows them to respond and adapt to changes in the environment. Among the environmental cues, light controls almost every aspect of A. thaliana's life cycle, including seed maturation, seed germination, seedling de-etiolation and flowering time. Light signals induce massive reprogramming of gene expression, producing changes in RNA polymerase II transcription, alternative splicing, and chromatin state. Since splicing reactions occur mainly while transcription takes place, the regulation of RNAPII transcription has repercussions in the splicing outcomes. This cotranscriptional nature allows a functional coupling between transcription and splicing, in which properties of the splicing reactions are affected by the transcriptional process. Chromatin landscapes influence both transcription and splicing. In this review, we highlight, summarize and discuss recent progress in the field to gain a comprehensive insight on the cross-regulation between chromatin state, RNAPII transcription and splicing decisions in plants, with a special focus on light-triggered responses. We also introduce several examples of transcription and splicing factors that could be acting as coupling factors in plants. Unravelling how these connected regulatory networks operate, can help in the design of better crops with higher productivity and tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocío S Tognacca
- Departamento De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Celular, Facultad De Ciencias Exactas Y Naturales, Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Instituto De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), CONICET-Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Guillermina Kubaczka
- Departamento De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Celular, Facultad De Ciencias Exactas Y Naturales, Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Instituto De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), CONICET-Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lucas Servi
- Departamento De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Celular, Facultad De Ciencias Exactas Y Naturales, Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Instituto De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), CONICET-Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Florencia S Rodríguez
- Departamento De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Celular, Facultad De Ciencias Exactas Y Naturales, Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Instituto De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), CONICET-Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Departamento De Biodiversidad Y Biología Experimental, Facultad De Ciencias Exactas Y Naturales, Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Micaela A Godoy Herz
- Departamento De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Celular, Facultad De Ciencias Exactas Y Naturales, Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Instituto De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), CONICET-Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ezequiel Petrillo
- Departamento De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Celular, Facultad De Ciencias Exactas Y Naturales, Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Instituto De Fisiología, Biología Molecular Y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), CONICET-Universidad De Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|