Sensitized by a sea slug: site-specific short-term and general long-term sensitization in Aplysia following Navanax attack.
Neurobiol Learn Mem 2021;
187:107542. [PMID:
34748927 DOI:
10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107542]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Neurobiological studies of the model species, Aplysia californica (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Euopisthobranchia), have helped advance our knowledge of the neural bases of different forms of learning, including sensitization, a non-associative increase in withdrawal behaviors in response to mild innocuous stimuli However, our understanding of the natural context for this learning has lagged behind the mechanistic studies. Because previous studies of sensitization used electric shock, or other artificial stimulus to produce sensitization, they left unaddressed the question of what stimuli in nature might cause sensitization, until our laboratory demonstrated short and long-term sensitization after predatory attack by spiny lobsters. In the present study, we tested for sensitization after attack by a very different predator, the predacious sea-slug, Navanax inermis (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Euopisthobranchia). Unlike the biting and prodding action of lobster attack, Navanax uses a rapid strike that sucks and squeezes its prey in an attempt to swallow it whole. We found that Navanax attack to the head of Aplysia caused strong immediate sensitization of head withdrawal, and weaker, delayed, sensitization of tail-mantle withdrawal. By contrast, attack to the tail of Aplysia resulted in no sensitization of either reflex. We also developed an artificial attack stimulus that allowed us to mimick a more consistently strong attack. This artificial attack produced stronger but qualitatively similar sensitization: Strong immediate sensitization of head withdrawal and weaker sensitization of tail-mantle withdrawal after head attack, immediate sensitization in tail-mantle withdrawal, but no sensitization of head withdrawal after tail attack. We conclude that Navanax attack causes robust site-specific sensitization (enhanced sensitization near the site of attack), and weaker general sensitization (sensitization of responses to stimuli distal to the attack site). We also tested for long-term sensitization (lasting longer than 24 hours) after temporally-spaced delivery of four natural Navanax attacks to the head of subject Aplysia. Surprisingly, these head attacks, any one of which strongly sensitizes head withdrawal in the short term, failed to sensitize head-withdrawal in the long term. Paradoxically, these repeated head attacks produced long-term sensitization in tail-mantle withdrawal. These experiments and observations confirm that Navanax attack causes short, and long-term sensitization of withdrawal reflexes of Aplysia. Together with the observation of sensitization after lobster attack, they strongly support the premise that sensitization in Aplysia is an adaptive response to sub-lethal predator attack. They also add site-specific sensitization to the list of naturally induced learning phenotypes, as well as paradoxical long-term sensitization of tail-mantle withdrawal (but not head withdrawal) after multiple head attacks.
Collapse