1
|
Warnecke M, Simmons JA, Simmons AM. Population registration of echo flow in the big brown bat's auditory midbrain. J Neurophysiol 2021; 126:1314-1325. [PMID: 34495767 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00013.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Echolocating big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) perceive their surroundings by broadcasting frequency-modulated (FM) ultrasonic pulses and processing returning echoes. Bats echolocate in acoustically cluttered environments containing multiple objects, where each broadcast is followed by multiple echoes at varying time delays. The bat must decipher this complex echo cascade to form a coherent picture of the entire acoustic scene. Neurons in the bat's inferior colliculus (IC) are selective for specific acoustic features of echoes and time delays between broadcasts and echoes. Because of this selectivity, different subpopulations of neurons are activated as the bat flies through its environment, while the physical scene itself remains unchanging. We asked how a neural representation based on variable single-neuron responses could underlie a cohesive perceptual representation of a complex scene. We recorded local field potentials from the IC of big brown bats to examine population coding of echo cascades similar to what the bat might encounter when flying alongside vegetation. We found that the temporal patterning of a simulated broadcast followed by an echo cascade is faithfully reproduced in the population response at multiple stimulus amplitudes and echo delays. Local field potentials to broadcasts and echo cascades undergo amplitude-latency trading consistent with single-neuron data but rarely show paradoxical latency shifts. Population responses to the entire echo cascade move as a unit coherently in time as broadcast-echo cascade delay changes, suggesting that these responses serve as an index for the formation of a cohesive perceptual representation of an acoustic scene.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Echolocating bats navigate through cluttered environments that return cascades of echoes in response to the bat's broadcasts. We show that local field potentials from the big brown bat's auditory midbrain have consistent responses to a simulated echo cascade varying across echo delays and stimulus amplitudes, despite different underlying individual neuronal selectivities. These results suggest that population activity in the midbrain can build a cohesive percept of an auditory scene by aggregating activity over neuronal subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James A Simmons
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.,Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Andrea Megela Simmons
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.,Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Segregating signal from noise through movement in echolocating bats. Sci Rep 2020; 10:382. [PMID: 31942008 PMCID: PMC6962340 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57346-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Segregating signal from noise is one of the most fundamental problems shared by all biological and human-engineered sensory systems. In echolocating bats that search for small objects such as tiny insects in the presence of large obstacles (e.g., vegetation), this task can pose serious challenges as the echoes reflected from the background might be several times louder than the desired signal. Bats’ ability to adjust their sensing, specifically their echolocation signal and sequence design has been deeply studied. In this study, we show that in addition to adjusting their sensing, bats also use movement in order to segregate desired echoes from background noise. Bats responded to an acoustically echoic background by adjusting their angle of attack. Specifically, the bats in our experiment used movement and not adaptation of sensory acquisition in order to overcome a sensory challenge. They approached the target at a smaller angle of attack, which results in weaker echoes from the background as was also confirmed by measuring the echoes of the setup from the bat’s point of view. Our study demonstrates the importance of movement in active sensing.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kugler K, Luksch H, Peremans H, Vanderelst D, Wiegrebe L, Firzlaff U. Echo-acoustic and optic flow interact in bats. J Exp Biol 2019; 222:jeb.195404. [DOI: 10.1242/jeb.195404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Echolocating bats are known to fly and forage in complete darkness using the echoes of their actively emitted calls to navigate and to detect prey. However, under dim light conditions many bats can also rely on vision. Many flying animals have been shown to navigate by optic flow information, and recently, bats were shown to exploit echo-acoustic flow to navigate through dark habitats. Here we show for the bat Phyllostomus discolor that in lighted habitats where self-motion induced optic flow is strong, optic and echo-acoustic flow interact in their efficiency to guide navigation. Echo-acoustic flow showed a surprisingly strong effect compared to optic flow. We thus demonstrate multimodal interaction between two far-ranging spatial senses, vision and echolocation, available in this combination almost exclusively for bats and toothed whales. Our results highlight the importance of merging information from different sensory systems in a sensory-specialist animal to successfully navigate and hunt under difficult conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Kugler
- Division of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, LMU Munich, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
- German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (IFB), Grosshadern Medical Centre, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harald Luksch
- Chair of Zoology, Department of Animal Sciences, TU Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany
| | - Herbert Peremans
- Department of Engineering Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dieter Vanderelst
- College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati OH, USA
| | - Lutz Wiegrebe
- Division of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, LMU Munich, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Uwe Firzlaff
- Chair of Zoology, Department of Animal Sciences, TU Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Warnecke M, Macías S, Falk B, Moss CF. Echo interval and not echo intensity drives bat flight behavior in structured corridors. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 221:jeb.191155. [PMID: 30355612 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.191155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
To navigate in the natural environment, animals must adapt their locomotion in response to environmental stimuli. The echolocating bat relies on auditory processing of echo returns to represent its surroundings. Recent studies have shown that echo flow patterns influence bat navigation, but the acoustic basis for flight path selection remains unknown. To investigate this problem, we released bats in a flight corridor with walls constructed of adjacent individual wooden poles, which returned cascades of echoes to the flying bat. We manipulated the spacing and echo strength of the poles comprising each corridor side, and predicted that bats would adapt their flight paths to deviate toward the corridor side returning weaker echo cascades. Our results show that the bat's trajectory through the corridor was not affected by the intensity of echo cascades. Instead, bats deviated toward the corridor wall with more sparsely spaced, highly reflective poles, suggesting that pole spacing, rather than echo intensity, influenced bat flight path selection. This result motivated investigation of the neural processing of echo cascades. We measured local evoked auditory responses in the bat inferior colliculus to echo playback recordings from corridor walls constructed of sparsely and densely spaced poles. We predicted that evoked neural responses would be discretely modulated by temporally distinct echoes recorded from the sparsely spaced pole corridor wall, but not by echoes from the more densely spaced corridor wall. The data confirm this prediction and suggest that the bat's temporal resolution of echo cascades may drive its flight behavior in the corridor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Warnecke
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Silvio Macías
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Benjamin Falk
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Cynthia F Moss
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Warnecke M, Falk B, Moss CF. Echolocation and flight behavior of the bat Hipposideros armiger terasensis in a structured corridor. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2018; 144:806. [PMID: 30180698 DOI: 10.1121/1.5050525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
In this study, the echolocation and flight behaviors of the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros armiger terasensis), which uses constant-frequency (CF) biosonar signals combined with a frequency-modulated (FM) sweep, are compared with those of the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), which uses FM signals alone. The CF-FM bat flew through a corridor bounded by vertical poles on either side, and the inter-pole spacing of the walls was manipulated to create different echo flow conditions. The bat's flight trajectories and echolocation behaviors across corridor conditions were analyzed. Like the big brown bat, the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat centered its flight trajectory within the corridor when the pole spacing was the same on the two walls. However, the two species showed different flight behaviors when the pole spacing differed on the two walls. While the big brown bat deviated from the corridor center towards the wall with sparse pole spacing, the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat did not. Further, in comparison to E. fuscus, H. a. terasensis utilized different echolocation patterns showing a prevalence of grouping sounds into clusters of three. These findings indicate that the two species' distinct sonar signal designs contribute to their differences in flight trajectories in a structured corridor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Warnecke
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
| | - Benjamin Falk
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
| | - Cynthia F Moss
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kugler K, Wiegrebe L. Echo-acoustic scanning with noseleaf and ears in phyllostomid bats. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 220:2816-2824. [PMID: 28768750 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.160309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The mammalian visual system is highly directional and mammals typically employ rapid eye movements to scan their environment. Both sound emission and hearing in echolocating bats are directional but not much is known about how bats use ear movements and possibly movements of the sound-emitting structures to scan space. Here, we investigated in a tightly controlled behavioural experiment how Phyllostomusdiscolor bats employ their echolocation system while being moved through differently structured environments: we monitored and reconstructed both a close-up of the facial structures in 3D, including the motile noseleaf and outer ears, and the sonar-beam of the bat while it was moved along reflectors. Despite the simple linear movement of the bats in the setup, the bats pointed their beam quite variably in azimuth with a standard deviation of about ±20 deg. This variation arises from yaw-type head rotations. Video analyses show that the bat's noseleaf twitches with every echolocation call. Second, we show that the bat's ears are raised to a rather stereotypical head-centred position with every echolocation call. Surprisingly, P. discolor can adjust the timing and the magnitude of these ear movements to the distance of the reflectors with millisecond precision. Our findings reveal echolocation-specific specialisations as well as general principles of scanning and stabilisation of a directional remote sense. The call-correlated movements of the facial structures may lead to a higher directionality of the echolocation system and may enable the bats to adjust their echo-acoustic gaze to dynamic environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Kugler
- Division of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, LMU Munich, Großhaderner Str. 2, Planegg-Martinsried 82152, Germany
| | - Lutz Wiegrebe
- Division of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, LMU Munich, Großhaderner Str. 2, Planegg-Martinsried 82152, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Budenz T, Denzinger A, Schnitzler HU. Reduction of emission level in approach signals of greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis): No evidence for a closed loop control system for intensity compensation. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0194600. [PMID: 29543882 PMCID: PMC5854437 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Bats lower the emission SPL when approaching a target. The SPL reduction has been explained by intensity compensation which implies that bats adjust the emission SPL to perceive the retuning echoes at the same level. For a better understanding of this control mechanism we recorded the echolocation signals of four Myotis myotis with an onboard microphone when foraging in the passive mode for rustling mealworms offered in two feeding dishes with different target strength, and determined the reduction rate for the emission SPL and the increase rate for the SPL of the returning echoes. When approaching the dish with higher target strength bats started the reduction of the emission SPL at a larger reaction distance (1.05 ± 0.21 m) and approached it with a lower reduction rate of 7.2 dB/halving of distance (hd), thus producing a change of echo rate at the ears of + 4 dB/hd. At the weaker target reaction distance was shorter (0.71 ± 0.24 m) and the reduction rate (9.1 dB/hd) was higher, producing a change of echo rate of—1.2 dB/hd. Independent of dish type, bats lowered the emission SPL by about 26 dB on average. In one bat where the echo SPL from both targets could be measured, the reduction of emission SPL was triggered when the echo SPL surpassed a similar threshold value around 41–42 dB. Echo SPL was not adjusted at a constant value indicating that Myotis myotis and most likely all other bats do not use a closed loop system for intensity compensation when approaching a target of interest. We propose that bats lower the emission SPL to adjust the SPL of the perceived pulse-echo-pairs to the optimal auditory range for the processing of range information and hypothesize that bats use flow field information not only to control the reduction of the approach speed to the target but also to control the reduction of emission SPL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Budenz
- Animal Physiology, Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Annette Denzinger
- Animal Physiology, Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
- Animal Physiology, Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corcoran AJ, Moss CF. Sensing in a noisy world: lessons from auditory specialists, echolocating bats. J Exp Biol 2017; 220:4554-4566. [DOI: 10.1242/jeb.163063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT
All animals face the essential task of extracting biologically meaningful sensory information from the ‘noisy’ backdrop of their environments. Here, we examine mechanisms used by echolocating bats to localize objects, track small prey and communicate in complex and noisy acoustic environments. Bats actively control and coordinate both the emission and reception of sound stimuli through integrated sensory and motor mechanisms that have evolved together over tens of millions of years. We discuss how bats behave in different ecological scenarios, including detecting and discriminating target echoes from background objects, minimizing acoustic interference from competing conspecifics and overcoming insect noise. Bats tackle these problems by deploying a remarkable array of auditory behaviors, sometimes in combination with the use of other senses. Behavioral strategies such as ceasing sonar call production and active jamming of the signals of competitors provide further insight into the capabilities and limitations of echolocation. We relate these findings to the broader topic of how animals extract relevant sensory information in noisy environments. While bats have highly refined abilities for operating under noisy conditions, they face the same challenges encountered by many other species. We propose that the specialized sensory mechanisms identified in bats are likely to occur in analogous systems across the animal kingdom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J. Corcoran
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Box 7325 Reynolda Station, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA
| | - Cynthia F. Moss
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bats Use Path Integration Rather Than Acoustic Flow to Assess Flight Distance along Flyways. Curr Biol 2017; 27:3650-3657.e3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
10
|
|
11
|
Greiter W, Firzlaff U. Echo-acoustic flow shapes object representation in spatially complex acoustic scenes. J Neurophysiol 2017; 117:2113-2124. [PMID: 28275060 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00860.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Revised: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Echolocating bats use echoes of their sonar emissions to determine the position and distance of objects or prey. Target distance is represented as a map of echo delay in the auditory cortex (AC) of bats. During a bat's flight through a natural complex environment, echo streams are reflected from multiple objects along its flight path. Separating such complex streams of echoes or other sounds is a challenge for the auditory system of bats as well as other animals. We investigated the representation of multiple echo streams in the AC of anesthetized bats (Phyllostomus discolor) and tested the hypothesis that neurons can lock on echoes from specific objects in a complex echo-acoustic pattern while the representation of surrounding objects is suppressed. We combined naturalistic pulse/echo sequences simulating a bat's flight through a virtual acoustic space with extracellular recordings. Neurons could selectively lock on echoes from one object in complex echo streams originating from two different objects along a virtual flight path. The objects were processed sequentially in the order in which they were approached. Object selection depended on sequential changes of echo delay and amplitude, but not on absolute values. Furthermore, the detailed representation of the object echo delays in the cortical target range map was not fixed but could be dynamically adapted depending on the temporal pattern of sonar emission during target approach within a simulated flight sequence.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Complex signal analysis is a challenging task in sensory processing for all animals, particularly for bats because they use echolocation for navigation in darkness. Recent studies proposed that the bat's perceptional system might organize complex echo-acoustic information into auditory streams, allowing it to track specific auditory objects during flight. We show that in the auditory cortex of bats, neurons can selectively respond to echo streams from specific objects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Greiter
- Chair of Zoology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Uwe Firzlaff
- Chair of Zoology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| |
Collapse
|